Palestine Election Guide-Eng

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Palestine Election Guide-Eng The Central Elections Commission (CEC) Palestine The Presidential Elections 2005 Guidebook 1 Copyright c 2005 The Central Elections Commission All Rights Reserved 2 Table of contents Welcome letter from the CEC Chairman Section I: Background on Palestine and elections 1. A brief history of Palestine 2. Palestinian political structure 3. The 1996 presidential and legislative elections 4. Issues on the Palestinian agenda Section II: The 2005 presidential elections 1. The call for elections 2. The Central Elections Commission 3. Legal framework and electoral system Section III: Electoral preparations and operations 1. The data entry center 2. Voter registration 3. Exhibition, challenges & additional registration 4. Civil registry voters 5. Candidate nominations, exhibition and challenges 6. Elections Appeals Court 7. Voter education campaigns 8. Observer accreditation 9. Polling centers, ballot boxes and election kits 10. Polling and counting procedures 11. Logistics: challenges and solutions Section IV: The 2005 presidential candidates 1. The candidates 2. Political parties and factions 3. Election campaigning codes of conduct Section V: International and domestic observers 3 A Welcome Letter from the CEC Chairman On behalf of the Central Elections Commission (CEC), it gives me great pride to welcome you to Palestine as we prepare for a critical event in the history of the Palestinian people. On Sunday, January 9th 2005, more than one million Palestinians are expected to head to polling stations in Jerusalem, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, to elect the new president of the Palestinian National Authority. It is the second time in recent history (the first being in 1996) that the Palestinians get the chance to practice their civil and democratic rights to select their leader, and thus to have a say in the shaping of their destiny. Given the political history of Palestine and the hardships Palestinians have lived under in the last half century, the importance of the present elections cannot be overstated. The present CEC was established in October 27, 2002 through a decree by the late President Arafat. It is an independent body that is responsible for the administration, conduct and supervision of Palestinian Presidential and Legislative elections. Thanks to the work of a team of dedicated and motivated staff, and the support of numerous international agencies, the CEC has already implemented a major drive to register eligible voters, conducted voter education campaigns, trained more than 17,500 supervisors and staff for polling and counting stations, coordinated the participation of thousands of local and international election observers, and secured that all logistical matters are in place and ready for Election Day. Despite the difficult circumstances of working within the reality and constraints of a military occupation, the CEC remains determined to conduct free, fair and transparent elections. We see the role of international observers and media representatives as a dual one: first to monitor our elections and to ensure that they are being held in 4 accordance with internationally accepted standards, and second to monitor the activities of the occupying power so that our elections could be held without any harassment or intimidation. The present booklet has been prepared by the CEC’s Public Relations department. It contains informative material to guide you as you witness and observe the forthcoming elections. We hope that it will enhance your understanding of the present election process, the challenges that face the CEC and the key issues of concern for Palestinian voters. If you need further information please do visit our website at www.elections.ps. Once again I welcome you to Palestine. Whether you are here as an international observer, a media representative or a guest, I extend to you my sincerest wishes for an exciting and rewarding experience, and hope that the present elections will herald a new era in the region, namely the establishment of a free Palestinian state – a state free from military occupation, a state based on democratic principles, but equally important a state that is based on respect for moral values and human dignity. Dr. Hanna Nasir Chairman, CEC 5 6 Section I: Background on Palestine and Elections 7 8 1- A Brief History of Palestine For thousands of years the geographical area known today as Palestine occupied a prominent place in human history and remained a site of special significance for different civilizations and religions. Throughout those years the indigenous people of the region endured empires and administrations imposed on them by outsiders, a situation that continues till today. In more recent history Palestine was administered as a group of regions that were part of the territories under the control of the Ottoman Empire. The region of Jerusalem, however, maintained a measure of autonomy. By the mid 19th century, the area’s population totaled around 500,000 Arab speakers, of which 60,000 were Christian, 20,000 Jewish and the rest Muslim. Around 50,000 Ottoman soldiers and administrators were also present in the area along with around 10,000 representatives of various European and American interests. While urban Palestine was more ‘modern’ and more closely integrated with Western societies, it remained tied to, and was the link with, a more traditional rural Palestine. Throughout Palestine, family and clan identities provided most people’s primary allegiances, and people of all religions and ethnic groups lived, for the most part, lives that were peacefully intertwined. This situation by and large continued until the unprecedented rupture in Palestinian society that occurred when Zionist militias used violence and intimidation to force most of the indigenous population from their homes and land in 1948. The following are key events in Palestinian modern history: a. The British Mandate (1917-1947) With the demise of the Ottoman Empire at the close of the First World War, Palestine was one of several former Ottoman Arab territories to be administered by Great Britain under the quasi-colonial Mandates System of the League of Nations. All but one of those Mandated Territories became fully independent States, as anticipated. Palestine was the exception. Despite the indigenous population’s aspirations for independence, in 1917 Great Britain adopted a proposal from Theodor Herzl’s World Zionist Organization, known as the Balfour Declaration, supporting the establishment of “a Jewish national home in Palestine”. The years 1922 to 1932 saw a growing tide of immigration to Palestine, with the Jewish population increasing from 83,970 to 192,137. Following Hitler’s rise to power in 1933 a further 100,000 predominantly German and Eastern European immigrants arrived in the area. Land acquisitions, expropriations and Jewish nationalist aspirations began to threaten local aspirations for a Palestinian state. Tension between the indigenous population and the new wave of colonialists 9 increased. Palestinian demands for sovereignty and resistance to Jewish immigration led to clashes in the 1920s, a General Strike in 1936, and a rebellion in 1937. Great Britain withdrew from Palestine in 1947, and passed responsibility for the problem to the United Nations. UN Resolution 181 advocated the partition of Palestine into two independent states. Although Jews owned less than 7% of the land and comprised only 30 percent of the population at that time, their state would be allocated 56.47% of Palestine, within which an estimated 407,000 Palestinians would continue to live. The Palestinians, who comprised 70% of the population, would be granted 43.53% of the land for their state. Jerusalem would be delegated the status of a corpus separatum and placed under the administration of the United Nations. The “Partition Plan” was rejected by the Palestinians, as well as other countries in the region, on the grounds that it condoned the displacement of a nation and violated the rights of the Palestinians to self-determination. The Jewish Agency accepted the resolution. b. The 1948 War and the Palestinian Refugee Crisis (1947-1967) The unilateral declaration of the State of Israel by the Jewish Agency on the 14th of May 1948, brought the armies of Egypt, Syria, Transjordan, Lebanon and Iraq into the areas allocated to the Palestinians in the Partition Plan, setting the scene for the 1948 war. By the end of the war, Israeli forces had defeated the Arab armies, gained control of 77.4% of Palestine, and created what would become one of the largest refugee populations in the world. Palestinians fled by force or in fear to the West Bank, Gaza Strip and neighboring Arab countries, following outrages such as that at Deir Yassin on 9th of April 1948, when Jewish forces invaded the Palestinian village and massacred 254 civilians. Approximately 914,000 Palestinians were displaced from their land, that which was to become Israel, leading to a major humanitarian crisis. The remaining parts of Palestine, the West Bank and Gaza, were placed under Jordanian and Egyptian administration respectively. UN Resolution 194 in the General Assembly stipulated the right of return for all displaced Palestinians. In 1964 the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) was established as the representative body in exile for the Palestinian people. The PLO evolved into an umbrella organization for different Palestinian factions, playing a critical role in mobilizing Palestinians and generating international support. By 1968, the PLO had been dominated by Fateh (the Palestinian Liberation Movement), which had been founded by Yasser Arafat and other members in 1959. c. The 1967 War and Israel’s Invasion of Lebanon (1967 – 1982) A second war broke out on the 5th of June 1967, between Israel on one side and Egypt, Syria and Jordan, on the other. By the end of the war Israel had captured the Sinai Peninsula, the Golan Heights, the Gaza Strip, the West Bank and East Jerusalem. East Jerusalem was annexed and the humanitarian refugee crisis intensified with the 10 displacement of an additional half a million Palestinians.
Recommended publications
  • The Palestinian Parliamentary Election and the Rise of Hamas
    RESEARCH PAPER 06/17 The Palestinian 15 MARCH 2006 Parliamentary Election and the rise of Hamas The militant Islamist movement Hamas won a surprise victory in the Palestinian parliamentary election of 25 January 2006 and is in the process of forming a government. This paper examines the background to the election and the various factors behind the Hamas victory, before considering the reaction to the result and the possible implications it may have. Background on the Arab-Israeli conflict and peace process can be found in Research Paper 05/29, The Middle East Peace Process: prospects after the Palestinian Presidential Elections, of 29 March 2005, while a chronology of key events can be found in Standard Note SN/IA/2693, Middle East Peace Process: a detailed chronology from 1990 to the present. Tim Youngs INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS & DEFENCE SECTION HOUSE OF COMMONS LIBRARY Recent Library Research Papers include: List of 15 most recent RPs 06/02 Social Indicators [includes article: New Year resolutions – how do 12.01.06 they figure?] 06/03 Unemployment by Constituency, December 2005 18.01.06 06/04 The Merchant Shipping (Pollution) Bill [Bill 68 of 2005-06] 23.01.06 06/05 Economic Indicators, February 2006 [includes article: 01.02.06 The 80% employment aspiration] 06/06 The Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill [Bill 111 of 2005-06] 06.02.06 06/07 The Children and Adoption Bill [Bill 96 of 2005-06] 07.02.06 06/08 Sudan: The Elusive Quest for Peace 08.02.06 06/09 Inflation: The value of the pound 1750-2005 13.02.06 06/10 Unemployment by Constituency,
    [Show full text]
  • April 2021 Volume XLIV, Bulletin No. 4 Contents Page I. UN Special
    April 2021 Volume XLIV, Bulletin No. 4 Contents Page I. UN Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process on Palestinian elections 1 II. UNRWA raises alarm on the situation of Palestine refugees in Lebanon 1 III. UN Women holds virtual ceremony to launch survivors of violence project 2 IV. UN Palestinian Rights Committee holds event on UNRWA assistance for Palestine refugees 4 V. UN Special Rapporteurs warn of rising levels of Israeli settler violence in a climate of impunity 8 VI. UN Special Coordinator briefs the Security Council on the situation in the Middle East 9 VII. Statement by Chair of the UN Palestinian Rights Committee at the Security Council open debate 13 VIII. UN Special Coordinator on recent escalation in Jerusalem and around Gaza 15 IX. Palestinian Rights Committee calls upon Security Council to ensure elections take place in OPT 16 Contents Page X. UN Special Coordinator on the postponement of Palestinian Legislative Council elections 16 XI. UNRWA responds to European Parliament resolution 17 The Bulletin can be found in the United Nations Information System on the Question of Palestine (UNISPAL) on the Internet at: https://www.un.org/unispal/data-collection/monthly-bulletin/ Disclaimer: The texts cited in this Monthly Bulletin have been reproduced in their original form. The Division for Palestinian Rights is consequently not responsible for the views, positions or discrepancies contained in these texts. http://www.facebook.com/UN.palestinianrights http://www.twitter.com/UNISPAL http://www.youtube.com/UNpalestinianrights https://www.instagram.com/unispal/ I. UN SPECIAL COORDINATOR FOR THE MIDDLE EAST PEACE PROCESS ON PALESTINIAN ELECTIONS On 1 April, the UN Special Coordinator for the Middle East Peace Process, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • War Starts Here!
    No 89, July 2011 Editorial As we get ready for another WRI get­together ­ with WRI's Council War Starts Here! meeting taking place in LuleÅ, as part of War Starts Here – here we have an issue of The Broken The militarisation of Sweden Rifle focusing on what we do best at WRI: mutual support and international solidarity. WRI is a network of groups committed to antimili­ tarism and nonviolence, the network depends on the work and support of its members ­ as many of you know WRI has avery small office run by two staff. Since its foundation WRI has been a natural source of solidarity on issues of antimili­ tarism and nonviolence. In many ways people have a sense of WRI being something like your political community, people from all parts of the world sharing common values, with whom you have contact from time to time and even in special occasions like a Council meeting you get to see them. In this newsletter we share a few examples of the importance of this mutual support. We kick off with two articles with background The global war machine kills each year we asked those we met, in which way they on the events planned in LuleÅ, directly and indirectly, millions of people, saw militarism around them, and it became where Ofog has been organising destroying entire communities, and destroys clear that militarism and Sweden's war policy a peace camp for several years. nature. Contrary to the popular image of is something that is rarely discussed. This is For 2011 Ofog decided to make Sweden, both at home and abroad, Sweden while an extensive militarization of Sweden is this an international event, so plays a major role in the war industry.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social, Economic, Political and Geo-Strategic Situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territories
    DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES OF THE UNION DIRECTORATE B POLICY DEPARTMENT BRIEFING AD HOC THE SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, POLITICAL AND GEO-STRATEGIC SITUATION IN THE OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORIES Abstract The Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) is an exceptional case study in that the Palestinians inhabit an occupied territory and the project of state-building is still in the making1. One cannot appreciate the extent of the dire situation in the OPT without bearing this in mind. Since the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948 and the Arab-Israeli war of 1967, Palestinians have undergone massively destabilising and profound uncertainties about their political identities.2 The Palestinian dilemma goes back to 1945 when Zionist leaders initiated a campaign for a homeland of their own, demanding all of historic Palestine. Ignoring Arab protests, Washington and Moscow backed a UN resolution calling for Palestine to be divided between Palestinians and Israelis. A war ensured between Israeli and Arab forces (the Arab League threw its support behind the Palestinian resistance). As a nation-in-the-making, Palestine was erased from the map and Israel was created. Many Palestinians were forced out of their homes to make way for the new state of Israel. The six-day war of 1967 drove another wave of Palestinian refugees from their land. These lost lands of Palestine fuelled Palestinian nationalism.3 The Palestinian struggle against the occupation has been considered as a key explanatory factor behind the emergence of the Islamist- secularist dialectic in the Occupied Territory.4 The two most significant political factions in the Palestinian arena are Fatah (meaning ‘Opening’ or ‘Conquest’ and a reverse acronym from the Arabic name Harakat al-Tahrir al-Watani al-Filastini, literally: Palestinian National Liberation Movement), a secular movement and Hamas (Harakat al-Muqawama al-Islamiyya, meaning ‘zeal’), the Islamic Resistance Movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestine Before the Elections
    Poll No. 97 | April 2021 Poll No. 97 April 2021 Palestine before the elections 1 Poll No. 97 | April 2021 Barghouthi ahead of Abu Mazen in presidential race while Fatah ahead of Hamas in PLC race Ramallah – Results of the most recent public opinion poll conducted by the Jerusalem Media and Communication Center (JMCC) in cooperation with Friedrich Ebert Stiftung showed imprisoned Marwan Barghouthi holds an advantage over President Abu Mazen if presidential elections are held as long as runners in the elections are limited to these two candidates, alongside Ismail Haniyeh. The results of the poll, which was held between April 3 and 13, showed that 33.5% of respondents would vote for Marwan Barghouthi while 24.5% would vote for Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen), 10.5% would vote for Ismail Haniyeh and 31.5% said they still had no answer. Meanwhile, 60.2% said they supported the idea of Marwan Barghouthi running for president, while 19.3% said they did not support the idea. Importance of holding elections The majority of respondents, 79.2%, said it was important to hold legislative elections in Palestine as opposed to 14.3% who said it was not important. Nonetheless, the biggest majority, 44.4% said they believed the declared elections would be postponed, as opposed to 38.6% who said they expected them to be held on time. Regarding the integrity of the upcoming elections, 28.4% responded they believed they would be fair while 35.2% said they would be somewhat fair and 27.1% said they did not think they would be fair at all.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2011 2
    PCPD ANNUAL REPORT 2011 Palestinian Centre for Peace and Democracy Sabat Building – 2nd floor, Edward Saed St., Ramallah, P.O. Box 2290 Phone: +9722965981 Fax: +97222965983 Email: [email protected] www.pcpd.org [email protected] YouTube: PCPDpalestinian CONTENTS LETTER FROM THE DIRECTOR GENERAL | 3 2011 BY NUMBERS | 4 2011 HIGHLIGHTS | 5 POLITICAL ANALYSIS: CHANGE, YOUTH AND THE UN PLAN | 6 WHO WE ARE, WHAT WE AIM FOR AND WHAT WE BELIEVE IN | 8 WHAT MAKES US DIFFERENT | 10 WHO WE WORK WITH | 11 OUR PROGRAMMES | 12 LIBERATION AND INDEPENDENCE | 14 DEMOCRACY AND THE PURSUIT OF RIGHTS, RESPONSIBILITIES AND EQUALITY | 16 YOUTH PARTICIPATION IN DECISION MAKING | 18 WOMEN EMPOWERMENT | 20 CAPACITY BUILDING | 22 COMMUNICATIONS | 22 SUCCESS STORIES | 23 CHALLENGES AND LESSONS LEARNED | 25 LOOKING AHEAD: 2012 AND BEYOND | 26 LEADERSHIP | 27 PCPD Annual Report 2011 2 LETTER FROM THE DIRECTOR GENERAL Dear friends and family, 2011 has been a momentous year, for the Arab World, Palestine, and PCPD. The Arab Spring left our organisation incredibly optimistic, as we saw PCPD’s values and mission affirmed by people all over the Middle East. The principles of democracy and human rights, which we hold at the center of our work, were boosted and exemplified by ordinary people and the media alike. Our main target groups – the youth, marginalised, poor and middle classes – rose up peacefully and made their voices heard around the globe. This success has made PCPD’s work that much more crucial. We are responsible for our people, and in supporting them to be active citizens. Despite the difficulties of economic crisis and Israeli occupation, PCPD implemented all of our projects successfully in 2011, and continues to serve every area of the West Bank.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2019 Dr
    Annual Report 2019 Dr. Taleb Awad, the Head of Board of Directors of the PCPD is always present at PCPD activities and is one of the prominent fgures who conducts lectures and sessions to the PCPD youth on a voluntary basis. At the start of 2019, Dr. Taleb Awad gave a political session entitled: the Palestinian Elections within the Constitutional Court’s decision. It is worth mentioning that Dr. Awad is an international expert in the issues of elections. PCPD is proud to have Dr. Awad heading the organization. The theme of the work for 2019 was “Gender Equality”, and the slogan that PCPD used in its activities was: Girls Equal Boys PCPD board of directors escorted PCPD staf in its feld activities. Ms. Tagreed Kishik, the deputy of the Head of Board along with Ms. Hilda Issa, the executive director hold a portrait that was distributed on the occasion of the 8th March; the International Woman’s Day. Annual Report 2019 1 An Overview of the Political events were given the utmost attraction of all the world. The Arab Summit was conducted Situation on the 31st of March 2019 where the Arab leaders put their priorities. The frst priority Since the beginning of the project activities, was the situation of Iran as the main enemy the political situation was difcult for the for the Arabs; then the issue of terrorism and Palestinian; the Americans and the Israelis fnally the Palestinian question; which was not were preparing themselves for the opening any more on the top of the Arabs’ agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Khaled Rajab-Final
    Strategic Planning under Fragility PlanningunderFragility Strategic Strategic Planning under Fragility The Role of Leadership in the Strategic Planning of Municipalities in Palestine Khaled Walid Rajab Khaled Walid Khaled Walid Rajab 204 UNU-MERIT UNU-MERIT MGSoG Khaled Walid Rajab-cover-240418.pu... woensdag 16 mei 2018 10:36 pagina 1 Strategic Planning under Fragility The Role of Leadership in the Strategic Planning of Municipalities in Palestine © 2018, Khaled Rajab ISBN 978-90-8666-455-9 Cover illustration: SDIP Policy Paper, published by the Ministry of Local Government (MoLG) in 2009 Publisher: Boekenplan, Maastricht www.boekenplan.nl All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission in writing, from the author. Strategic Planning under Fragility The Role of Leadership in the Strategic Planning of Municipalities in Palestine DISSERTATION to obtain the degree of Doctor at the Maastrich University, on the authority of the Rector Magnificus Prof. Dr. Rianne M. Letschert in accordance with the decision of the Board of Deans, to be defended in public on Tuesday 19th of June 2018 at 10.00 hours by Khaled Walid Rajab Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Adam Szirmai , Maastricht University. Co-supervisors: Dr. Paul Rabé, Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS), Erasmus University. Forbes Davidson, Associate, Institute for Housing and Urban Development Studies (IHS), Erasmus University. Assessment Committee: Prof. Dr. Mark Bevir (Chairperson) Dr. Dr. Michal Natorski, Maastricht University Prof. Dr. Jurian Edelenbos, Erasmus University Dr. Khaled Abdelhalim, the American University in Cairo Acknowledgments The journey to complete this dissertation has been a challenging but rewarding endeavour.
    [Show full text]
  • Dictionary of Palestinian Political Terms
    Dictionary of Palestinian Political Terms PASSIA Palestinian Academic Society for the Study of International Affairs, Jerusalem PASSIA, the Palestinian Academic Society for the Study of International Affairs, is an Arab, non-profit Palestinian institution with a financially and legally indepen- dent status. It is not affiliated with any government, political party or organization. PASSIA seeks to present the Question of Palestine in its national, Arab and interna- tional contexts through academic research, dialogue and publication. PASSIA endeavors that research undertaken under its auspices be specialized, scientific and objective and that its symposia and workshops, whether interna- tional or intra-Palestinian, be open, self-critical and conducted in a spirit of har- mony and cooperation. Copyright PASSIA 3rd updated and revised edition, December 2019 ISBN: 978-9950-305-52-6 PASSIA Publication 2019 Tel.: 02-6264426 | Fax: 02-6282819 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.passia.org PO Box 19545, Jerusalem Contents Abbreviations ……………………………………………………………………………………………. i Foreword …………………………………………………………………….….…………..……………. iii Dictionary A-Z ………………………………………………………………………….………………. 1 Main References Cited…………………………………………..……………………………… 199 Abbreviations ACRI Association for Civil Rights in PCBS Palestinian Central Bureau of Israel Statistics AD Anno Domini PFLP Popular Front for the Liberation AIPAC American Israel Public Affairs of Palestine Committee PFLP-GC Popular Front for the Liberation ALF Arab Liberation Front of Palestine – General ANM
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy in Palestine and the Middle East Peace Process
    PUBLIC OPINION, PUBLIC DIPLOMACY AND PEACE MAKING 35 share experiences of new peace polls under- can’t recall when such a small grant (£7,071) 3. These include Alexandros Lordos and Erol Kaymak taken in all these key conflicts this year, at the has achieved and led to so much. A little from Cyprus, Nader Said-Foqahaa from Palestine, Mina Zemach from Israel, Yashwant Deshmukh WAPOR Annual Conference in Lausanne, money in the right place at the right time can from India, and Pradeep Peiris from Sri Lanka. Switzerland (11 –13 September 2009). sometimes accomplish very great things. 4. See Marianne Elliott, ‘The Good Friday Agree- It has taken ten years to implement the Belfast ment, Ten Years On’, British Academy Review , issue Notes 12, January 2009. Agreemen t4 and it also seems to have taken the same ten years to learn and apply some of 1. For a review of the political impact of these polls, see Colin Irwin, The People’s Peace Process in the most important lessons of that peace Northern Ireland (Basingstoke and New York: Dr Colin Irwin is Senior Research Fellow in the process to other conflicts around the world. In Palgrave MacMillan, 2002). Institute of Irish Studies at the University of this I must extend my thanks to the British 2. Colin Irwin, ‘Research Ethics and Peacemaking’, in Liverpool. More on Peace Polls can be found at Academy who supported me when others The Handbook of Social Research Ethics , ed. D. Mertens www.peacepolls.org would not. During all my years of research I and P.
    [Show full text]
  • Jmccpalestinian Council.Pdf
    COPYRIGHT © Jerusalem Media & Communication Centre January 1998 Information in this publication may be quoted providing the JMCC is fully credited. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in any retrieval system of any nature, without the prior express written permission of the JMCc. DESIGN JMCC PRINT National Computers Printer Jl-i¥L •• ~¥1 V"~L~)A JMCC POB 25047, East Jerusalem Tel 02-5819777 Fax 02-5829534 email [email protected] webpage: www.jmcc.org IIounoO Introduction Structure of the Palestinian Legislative Council Chronology Presidential decrees International Observers Number of voters distributed according to constituencies Number ofPLC Candidates distributed according to constituencies PLC candidates list and PLC Members results of elections distributed according to constituencies Presidential Elections Results 49 PLC results according to affiliations (WB & Gaza) 51 PLC results according to affiliations (WB) 52 PLC results according to affiliations (Gaza) 52 Women participation in PLC elections 53 Standing Orders 55 PLC Committees 79 PLC Resolutions/decisions 81 PLC Corruption Report 133 PLC Economic Committee Report 171 Organizational Structure of the Council's Presidency 177 Profile of PLC Members 179 PLC Charts Figure 1- Basic Statistics about PLC Members 223 Figure 2- Council Members' Political Affiliation 224 Figure 3- A- Distribution of Council Members according to 225 the Constituencies. B- Residency of Council Members Figure 4- A- Council Members by Profession. B- Council Members and the PLO. Figure 5- Struggle History of the Council Members 227 Figure 6- Gender of Council Members 228 Palestinian Ministerial Cabinet 229 The presence of an elected Palestinian Council is seen as an important development in the political life ofthe Palestinian people who regard it as one ofthe major achievements emanating from the current peace process.
    [Show full text]
  • N° 459 October 2006
    n° 459 October 2006 Report International Fact-finding Mission Failing the Palestinian State, Punishing its People: the Impact of the Economic Strangulation on Human Rights within the Occupied Palestinian Territory I. Introduction II. The Background of the Missiont III. The Deterioration of the Socio-economic Situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory IV. The Promises and the Shortcomings of the Temporary International Mechanism (TIM) V. Conclusions I. Introduction FIDH/1 The current report is the outcome of an extensive research over the period from June to October 2006. A mission of the International Federation for Human Rights visited Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) between 25 June and 2 July 2006. The mission was in close coordination with Médecins du Monde (Doctors of the World), which in parallel conducted an evaluation of the evolution of the health situation in the Gaza Strip on the basis of a large inquiry among the medical and health care personnel of hospitals and clinics. The mission was set up in order to examine the situation of economic and social rights in Gaza and the West Bank1 almost a year after Israel ‘disengaged’ from the Gaza strip and three months after Israel and the international community decided to suspend all contact with the Palestinian Authority government and to interrupt all aid channelled to and via that government. This was because a Hamas-led government had come to power on 29 March 2006 following elections held on 25 January 2006. The mission’s goal was to determine how the conditions under which the ‘disengagement’ from the Gaza Strip took place impacted the economic and social rights of the inhabitants of the Gaza Strip.
    [Show full text]