Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons Faculty Scholarship Winter 2018 Sanctions and the Blurred Boundaries of International Economic Law Perry Bechky Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/faculty Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Perry Bechky, Sanctions and the Blurred Boundaries of International Economic Law, 83 Mo. L. Rev. 1 (2018). https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/faculty/790 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. MISSOURI LAW REVIEW VOLUME 83 WINTER 2018 NUMBER 1 Sanctions and the Blurred Boundaries of International Economic Law PerryS. Bechky I. INTRODUCTION Economic sanctions are often said to occupy a middle space between communiqu6s and combat.' As this description makes clear, sanctions are a political tool - but a political tool that operates through economic regulation. 2 They are simultaneously economic and political. Their dual nature seems to place sanctions in a twilight zone, neither tru- ly in nor out of the academic discipline of international economic law ("IEL"). Sanctions tend to be marginalized in IEL scholarship, generally taking little space in the IEL literature and at the podiums of IEL conferences and courses. While economic sanctions loom large today in headline news and the practice of international trade law, they are not proportionately repre- sented in recent JEL literature. Rather, IEL scholarship seems content to leave sanctions to other disciplines like public international law, economics, and international relations.