DOCSLIB.ORG

Shoshone County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazards

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shoshone County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazards Shoshone County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazards Mitigation Plan Shoshone County, with the Cities of Kellogg, Mullan, Osburn, Pinehurst, Smelterville, Wallace & Wardner August 31, 2009 City of Smelterville Elevation 2,234 ft This effort developed with the Shoshone County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazards Mitigation Planning Committee and environmental and regional planning services provided by: TerraGraphics Environmental Engineering, Inc. 108 West Idaho Ave. Kellogg, Idaho 83837 Table of Contents 1. Adoptions, Promulgations, and Acceptance ..........................................................................1 1.1. FEMA Region X Letter of Approval ...............................................................................1 1.2. Authorship and Conveyance .........................................................................................2 1.3. Shoshone Board of County Commissioners Adoption ..................................................3 1.4. Kellogg City Council Adoption.......................................................................................4 1.5. Mullan City Council Adoption ........................................................................................5 1.6. Osburn City Council Adoption .......................................................................................6 1.7. Pinehurst City Council Adoption....................................................................................7 1.8. Smelterville City Council Adoption ................................................................................8 1.9. Wallace City Council Adoption ......................................................................................9 1.10. Wardner City Council Adoption ...................................................................................10 1.11. Representatives of Shoshone County Government....................................................11 1.12. Representatives of City Governments ........................................................................12 1.13. Structural Fire Protection Services Representatives...................................................13 1.14. Representatives of Federal and State Agencies, Communities and Companies........14 2. Planning Environment..........................................................................................................16 2.1. Development and Approval Process...........................................................................16 2.1.1. Mission Statement...............................................................................................16 2.1.2. Vision Statement .................................................................................................17 2.1.3. Goals ...................................................................................................................17 2.1.3.1. Objectives to Meet Goals ................................................................................17 2.2. FEMA Disaster Mitigation Planning.............................................................................18 2.3. Linkage to the Idaho State Mitigation Plan..................................................................19 2.4. Guidance and Integration with County Planning Activities..........................................19 2.5. Municipality Planning Guidance ..................................................................................20 2.6. Agency Planning Guidance.........................................................................................24 2.7. Organizational Planning Guidance..............................................................................25 2.8. Membership on Planning Committee Summary..........................................................25 2.9. Planning Process Summary........................................................................................27 2.10. Public Involvement Summary......................................................................................33 2.10.1. Press Releases ...................................................................................................42 2.10.1.1. Public Meetings Media Coverage....................................................................42 2.10.1.2. Public Review Period Announced ...................................................................43 2.10.2. Public Mail Survey...............................................................................................44 2.10.3. Public Review Process........................................................................................49 Shoshone County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazards Mitigation Plan: August 31, 2009 - i - 3. Shoshone County and Local Municipalities .........................................................................51 3.1. Demographics .............................................................................................................51 3.2. Population Density and Development .........................................................................52 3.3. Resource Economics ..................................................................................................53 3.4. Land Areas and Cover ................................................................................................54 3.5. Land Ownership ..........................................................................................................56 3.6. Climatic Conditions .....................................................................................................56 3.6.1. Kellogg ................................................................................................................57 3.6.2. Wallace – Woodland Park ...................................................................................57 3.6.3. Mullan..................................................................................................................57 3.6.4. Avery ...................................................................................................................58 3.6.5. Clarkia .................................................................................................................58 3.7. USGS Annual Peak Streamflow..................................................................................58 3.7.1. Main Fork Coeur d’Alene River System ..............................................................59 3.7.2. South Fork Coeur d’Alene River System.............................................................59 3.7.3. St. Joe River System...........................................................................................61 3.8. Municipal Water Supply Systems in Shoshone County ..............................................62 3.9. Summary of Superfund Status in the Silver Valley .....................................................64 3.9.1. CERCLA Remedies in the Context of Flooding...................................................65 3.9.2. Flooding and Drainage Under CERCLA Actions.................................................66 3.9.3. Municipal Drainage and Flood Control ................................................................66 3.9.4. Milo Creek Flooding in May 1997........................................................................67 3.9.5. Sediment Deposition in Spring 2008 ...................................................................67 3.9.6. Contaminant Management Rule..........................................................................69 3.10. Valuation of Real Property ..........................................................................................69 3.10.1. Private Property...................................................................................................70 3.10.2. Public Buildings ...................................................................................................72 3.10.3. Other Improvement Values .................................................................................74 4. Shoshone County Natural Hazard Assessments.................................................................77 4.1. Phase I Hazard Profile ................................................................................................86 4.2. Flood ...........................................................................................................................87 4.2.1. Weather...............................................................................................................89 4.2.2. Topography and Geographic Influences .............................................................90 4.2.2.1. Understanding Stream Order as an Analysis Tool ..........................................90 4.2.3. History .................................................................................................................91 4.2.4. Development .......................................................................................................93 Shoshone County Multi-Jurisdictional Hazards Mitigation Plan: August 31, 2009 - ii - 4.2.5. Shoshone County Flood Profile...........................................................................93 4.2.6. Resources at Risk ...............................................................................................94 4.2.6.1. Private Property Improvement Values.............................................................94 4.2.6.2. Government Resource Improvement Values ..................................................96 4.2.6.3. Replacement Cost of Superfund Site Remediation .........................................98
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Silver Valley Idaho 2010–2011 Community Resource & Relocation Guide
    EDUCATION economic overvieW housinG RECREATION medical silver valley idaho 2010–2011 community resource & relocation Guide www.nygaardpromotions.com The Mouse Pad Hello, neighbor! 208.682.3669 509.723.2293 You are the center of our business • Computer Services WardwellWardwell InsuranceInsurance AgcyAgcy Inc Please stop by and say, “Hi!” • Home and Small Office Networking AnitaAnita Wardwell,Wardwell, Agent Kellogg, ID 83837 I’m looking forward to serving • Information Technology Sales 416Bus: W 208-784-1388 Cameron Ave Kellogg, ID 83837 your needs for insurance and www.anitawardwell.comBus: 208-784-1388 • Onsite Services www.anitawardwell.com financial services. Like a good neighbor, State Farm is there.® CALL ME TODAY. 2 locations to serve you better 606 N Division St Pinehurst ID | 208.682.3669 17813 E Appleway Suite B Spokane Valley WA | 509.723.2293 1001013 State Farm, Bloomington, IL BUILDING MAINTENANCE AND SUPPLY INC. Serving the Silver Valley for Over 38 Years! • Lumber & Building Materials • Hardware • Paint Center • Plumbing & Electrical • Carpet & Appliances • Hunting & Fishing Supplies • Camping Supplies • Gold Panning Supplies WALLACE START RIGHT. START HERE.® 716 Bank Street Wallace, Idaho 208-556-1164 WELCOME TO SILVER VALLEY . he Silver Valley, heart of Shoshone County, is cradled between the Coeur d’Alene Mountains and the Bitterroot Range Tamong the pristine wilderness of Northern Idaho. Surrounded by lush green mountains, rugged canyons, rushing streams and crystal clear alpine lakes, this valley overflows with natural resources. The Silver Valley is one of the first frontiers of the Pacific Northwest and has a history as rich as its wealth from the silver, gold, lead and zinc mines.
    [Show full text]
  • HMC 125 Year Book Narrative 042816.Indd
    Celebrating 125 Years PERSISTENCE PERSPECTIVE POSITION Hecla’s management team, Burke, Idaho, ca. 1901. Left to right: Fremont Rowe, Doc Evans, Ed Torkelson, Chet Lawrence, Charles Foreman, Pete Ratoni, Ed “Spud” Murphy, Bert Sloan. Burke was the location of the original Hecla mine (as well as the Hercules and the Star); at its height, as many as 1,400 people lived along its single street at the bottom of Burke Canyon. On the cover, a 1927 photograph of workers from the Hecla mine is juxtaposed with a 2015 photo of miners at Hecla’s newest operating property: the Casa Berardi gold mine in Quebec. TABLE OF CONTENTS 02 05 11 19 34 36 40 Foreword Persistence: Perspective: Position: Mining in the Responsibility Milestones The First 100 Years The Last 25 Years The Future 21st Century Hecla’s management team, Burke, Idaho, ca. 1901. Left to right: Fremont Rowe, Doc Evans, Ed Torkelson, Chet Lawrence, Charles Foreman, Pete Ratoni, Ed “Spud” Murphy, Bert Sloan. Burke was the location of the original Hecla mine (as well as the Hercules and the Star); at its height, as many as 1,400 people lived along its single street at the bottom of Burke Canyon. On the cover, a 1927 photograph of workers from the Hecla mine is juxtaposed with a 2015 photo of miners at Hecla’s newest operating property: the Casa Berardi gold mine in Quebec. CAPITALIZED FOR HALF A MILLION DOLLARS AND INCORPORATED ON OCTOBER 14, 1891, HECLA MINING COMPANY STANDS TODAY AS THE LAST OF THE PIONEER MINING COMPANIES OF NORTH IDAHO’S FABLED SILVER VALLEY — THE OLDEST U.S.-BASED PRECIOUS METALS MINING COMPANY AND THE LARGEST PRIMARY SILVER PRODUCER IN THE UNITED STATES.
    [Show full text]
  • Hecla Mining Company Annual Report
    Hecla Mining Company Annual Report Silver Production Highlights (Ounces) Dollars in thousands except per share and per ounce amounts 2000 7,998,677 2001 7,434,290 2002 8,681,293 Financial Data and Ratios 2002 2001 Sales of products $ 105,700 $ 85,247 Gross profit 23,715 4,719 Silver Reserves, Jan. 1, 2003 Income (loss) from discontinued operations (2,224) 11,922 Proven & Probable Net income 8,639 2,340 (Contained Ounces) Loss applicable to common shareholders (14,614)1 (5,710) Greens Creek* 31,252,609 1 San Sebastian 8,761,109 Basic and diluted loss per common share (0.18) (0.08) Total 40,013,718 Cash and cash equivalents at end of year 19,542 7,560 *Hecla’s Interest (29.73%) Best performer on the NYSE Capital expenditures 15,251 18,035 Total assets 160,141 153,116 Financial ratios: Gold Production Current ratio 1.39:1 0.99:1 (Ounces) Hecla: The best bet on silver and gold Total liabilities to equity 1.23:1 1.64:1 2000 146,038 Year-End Data 2001 194,742 Common shares outstanding (in thousands) 86,179 73,007 2002 239,633 2002 Annual Report Common shareholders of record 8,584 8,926 Preferred shares outstanding (in thousands) 753 2,300 Preferred shareholders of record 77 146 Gold Reserves, Jan. 1, 2003 Proven & Probable Record gold and silver production Employees 720 701 (Contained Ounces) Operational Data La Camorra 412,332 Silver production (oz) 8,681,293 7,434,290 Greens Creek* 268,603 Gold production (oz) 239,633 194,742 San Sebastian 88,269 Total cash cost per ounce: Total 769,204 *Hecla’s Interest (29.73%) One hundred and twelve years of discovering, acquiring, Silver 2 $ 2.16 $ 3.52 developing and producing precious metals and mineral resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Hecla Mining Company 2017 Annual Report
    CREATING VALUE THROUGH INNOVATIVE MINING 2017 ANNUAL REPORT Greens Creek Admiralty Island, Alaska Kinskuch Alice Arm, BC Opinaca / Wildcat Rock Creek James Bay, Quebec Silver Valley Noxon, Montana Wallace, Idaho Casa Berardi Vancouver, BC Montanore Val d’Or, Quebec Libby, Montana Val d’Or, Quebec Coeur d’Alene, Idaho Fayolle Val d’Or, Quebec Heva–Hosco Lucky Friday Val d’Or, Quebec Mullan, Idaho Monte Cristo Esmeralda County, Nevada San Juan Silver Creede, Colorado operating mine pre-development project San Sebastian Durango, Mexico exploration project corporate office Innovations such as the tele-remote load-haul-dump at Greens Creek and the automated shaft at Casa Berardi can increase productivity and safety, generating significant returns on investment. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (Dollars in thousands except in per-share and per-ounce amounts. As of December 31.) FINANCIAL DATA 2017 2016 Sales of products $ 577,775 $ 645,957 Gross profit 156,986 191,506 Cash flow provided by operating activities 115,878 225,328 Net income (loss) (23,519) 69,547 Net income (loss) applicable to common shareholders (24,071) 68,995 Basic income (loss) per common share (0.06) 0.18 Cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments 219,865 198,894 Capital expenditures 105,393 163,128 YEAR-END DATA Common shares outstanding (in thousands) 399,176 395,287 Weighted average number of shares outstanding for the year – basic (in thousands) 397,394 386,416 Employees 1,431 1,396 OPERATIONAL DATA Silver production (oz) 12,484,844 17,177,317 Gold production (oz) 232,684
    [Show full text]
  • Play Stay Dine
    Wallace Play Stay Shop Dine Explore Unwind 2021-22 Visitor Guide wallaceid.fun Free! Take One W HERCULES2 Wallace 2021-22 Visitor Guide INN Wallace 2021-22 Visitor Guide 3 Overnight or Extended Stay allace offers a storybook kind HERCULESOvernight or Extended INN Stay ofW travel experience. Overnight or Extended Stay It’s entirely listed on the National Register of Historic Places, nestled among “Hands-down, this is the best tumbling mountain lodging in Wallace...” streams, deep wooded canyons and abundant Tripadvisor.com wildlife... Luxurious Suites FourUnbeatable spacious housekeeping Rates suites, each LAT CREEN S sleeps• F up S to four,TV with kingsized beds, Autumn on Pine Street with Mine Tour Trolley and Northern Pacific Depot Museum. flat• screenKING & Q UEENTV’s, BEDS Wi-Fi, covered parking Lizzie Keitel Image Four• L AZYspacious BOYS housekeeping suites, each • FandULLY S IZEDa hot AND tub for relaxation. A storied place, Wallace STOCKED KITCHENS sleeps up to four, with kingsized beds, ...its place in the Plus there are special events Within• COIN O walkingP LAUNDRY distance to town, the heart of one of the and festivals all year world’s richest silver flat• J ACUZZIscreen HOT TTV’s,UB Wi-Fi, covered parking long. And the Hercules Inn is located on Front and 2nd districts, 1.25 billion Probable Center of • COVEREDand, LaIGHTED hot tub for relaxation. ounces mined and the Universe. St., andPARKING just two blocks from exit 61 off I-90 counting, is a big Add in a reputa- reason it’s a na- tion for hospitality Each of our four suites sleeps up to four guests tional landmark.
    [Show full text]
  • Repellant Beauty: a Rational Inquiry Into 21St Century
    REPELLANT BEAUTY: A RATIONAL INQUIRY INTO 21ST CENTURY PATENTED LODE MINE USE by John Gaeddert A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Public Policy and Administration Boise State University May 2018 © 2018 John Gaeddert ALL RIGHTS RESERVED BOISE STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE COLLEGE DEFENSE COMMITTEE AND FINAL READING APPROVALS of the dissertation submitted by John Gaeddert Dissertation Title: Repellant Beauty: A Rational Inquiry into 21st Century Patented Lode Mine Use Date of Final Oral Examination: 28 February 2018 The following individuals read and discussed the dissertation submitted by student John Gaeddert, and they evaluated his presentation and response to questions during the final oral examination. They found that the student passed the final oral examination. Gregory Hill, Ph.D. Co-Chair, Supervisory Committee Nicholas (Luke) Fowler, Ph.D. Co-Chair, Supervisory Committee Monica L. Hubbard, Ph.D. Member, Supervisory Committee The final reading approval of the dissertation was granted by Luke Fowler, Ph.D., and Greg Hill, Ph.D., Co-Chairs of the Supervisory Committee. The dissertation was approved by the Graduate College. DEDICATION This work is dedicated to my parents, girls and wife who I have with me- always. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In titling this dissertation Repellant Beauty, I acknowledge a passage by Dr. Francaviglia (1991) in Hard Places: Reading the Landscape of America’s Historic Mining Districts, which stayed with me as a recurring theme while writing. The text reads, “The creators of mining landscapes have provided us settings that are difficult to view with neutrality, for these landscapes appeal and repel simultaneously.
    [Show full text]
  • LIVING with LEAD: an ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY of IDAHO's COEUR D'alenes, 1885-2011 by Bradley Dean Snow a Dissertation Submitte
    LIVING WITH LEAD: AN ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY OF IDAHO’S COEUR D’ALENES, 1885-2011 by Bradley Dean Snow A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana April, 2012 ©COPYRIGHT by Bradley Dean Snow 2012 All Rights Reserved ii APPROVAL of a dissertation submitted by Bradley Dean Snow This dissertation has been read by each member of the dissertation committee and has been found to be satisfactory regarding content, English usage, format, citation, bibliographic style, and consistency and is ready for submission to The Graduate School. Dr. Mary Murphy Approved for the Department of History, Philosophy and Religious Studies Dr. David Cherry Approved for The Graduate School Dr. Carl A. Fox iii STATEMENT OF PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a doctoral degree at Montana State University, I agree that the Library shall make it available to borrowers under rules of the Library. I further agree that copying of this dissertation is allowable only for scholarly purposes, consistent with “fair use” as prescribed in the U.S. Copyright Law. Requests for extensive copying or reproduction of this dissertation should be referred to ProQuest Information and Learning, 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106, to whom I have granted “the exclusive right to reproduce and distribute my abstract in any format whole or in part.” Bradley Dean Snow April, 2012 iv DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this work to my amazing, wonderful children: Nathan, Francesca, Grant, and Willa.
    [Show full text]
  • HMC Fact Sheet 04012017.Indd
    April 2017 Investor Fact Sheet www.hecla-mining.com Hecla Mining Company is not only the largest and one of the lowest-cost U.S. silver producers, and the third largest U.S. producer of both zinc and lead, but also a growing gold producer. Hecla owns and operates four mines on district-sized land packages in mining-friendly North American jurisdictions: Greens Creek in Alaska, one of the largest and highest-margin primary silver mines in the world; the newly revitalized Lucky Friday silver mine in North Idaho; the San Sebastian silver-gold mine near Durango, Mexico; and the Casa Berardi gold mine in Quebec. In addition to its diversified silver and Share Performance NYSE: HL gold operating and cash-flow generating base, Hecla has a number of exploration properties and pre- (1) end of Q4: 12/31/16, as of 03/21/17 development projects in seven world-class silver and gold mining districts in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. Share Price: $ 5.14(1) 52-Week Range: $ 2.57 – $7.64(1) 2016 saw record silver production of 17.2 million ounces with 233,929 ounces of gold production, with Basic Shares: 395.3 million silver production exceeding the Company’s expectations for 2016. 2017 company-wide production is Fully Diluted: 399.2 million Market Capitalization: $ 2.03B (1) estimated to be 14 to 15.5 million ounces of silver and 230,000 to 250,000 ounces of gold. Multiple Secure Revenue Streams Strong Cash Flow Flexibility Low Political Risk Jurisdictions Strong Healthy Cash Margins Investment Established Work Force Fundamentals Strong Financial Position Commitment to Safety Four High-Quality Operations Operating Mines Greens Creek – Admiralty Island, Alaska ■ One of the world’s largest and lowest-cost primary silver mines.
    [Show full text]
  • Hecla Mining Company 2016 Annual Report
    A STRATEGY THAT WORKS 2016 Annual Report 299 million ounces of silver reserves added over the past 10 years alone. Record production three years straight. Strong financial and share performance leading to increased value on a per-share basis. And a clear road map for further value and growth creation. Greens Creek Lucky Friday 40% of consolidated revenue 15% of consolidated revenue 26% zinc 15% zinc 46%4 silver 53%5 silver 32% lead 9% lead 19% gold Casa Berardi San Sebastian 27% of consolidated revenue 18% of consolidated revenue 0.3%0 silver 664% silver 36% gold 99.7% gold Greens Creek Admiralty Island, Alaska Kinskuch Alice Arm, BC Rock Creek Opinaca / Wildcat Noxon, Montana James Bay, Quebec Montanore Vancouver, BC Libby, Montana Casa Berardi Val d’Or, Quebec Coeur d’Alene, Idaho Val d’Or, Quebec Lucky Friday Fayolle Silver Valley Mullan, Idaho Val d’Or, Quebec Heva–Hosco Wallace, Idaho Val d’Or, Quebec Monte Cristo Esmeralda County, Nevada San Juan Silver Creede, Colorado San Sebastian operating mine Durango, Mexico pre-development project exploration project corporate office Financial Highlights (Dollars in thousands except in per-share and per-ounce amounts / as of December 31) FINANCIAL DATA 2016 2015 Sales of products $ 645,957 $ 443,567 Gross profit 191,506 38,511 Cash flow provided by operating activities 225,328 106,445 Net income (loss) 69,547 (86,968) Net income (loss) applicable to common shareholders 68,995 (87,520) Basic income (loss) per common share 0.18 (0.23) Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments 198,894
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Historical Mining in the Coeur D'alene River Basin
    Pathways of Metal Transfer from Mineralized Sources to Bioreceptors: A Synthesis of the Mineral Resources Program’s Past Environmental Studies in the Western United States and Future Research Directions Chapter 6—Impacts of historical mining in the Coeur d’Alene River Basin By Laurie S. Balistrieri1, Stephen E. Box1, Arthur A. Bookstrom1, Robert L. Hooper2, and J. Brian Mahoney2 CONTENTS BACKGROUND ore shoots in Precambrian rocks of the Background 1 Mining began in the late 1880s in the Belt Supergroup (Fryklund, 1964; Discussion of mining impacts 3 Coeur d’Alene mining district in north- Hobbs and others, 1965; Zartman and What is known about the distributions, con- ern Idaho (fig. 1). Although only two Stacey, 1971; Bennett and centrations, and speciation of Pb and Zn in the Coeur d’Alene River basin? 3 mines, the Galena and Lucky Friday, Venkatakrishnan, 1982; Leach and Particulate lead. 3 currently are operating, more than 90 others, 1988; Criss and Fleck, 1990). Dissolved zinc 4 historical mines exist in this region The veins are separated into two major Solid-phase speciation 5 (Bennett and others, 1989). Most of the types by ore mineralogy: (1) lead- and What is known about the processes that mobi- mines are along the South Fork of the zinc-rich veins having argentiferous lize Pb and Zn from their sources and Coeur d’Alene River and its major galena (PbS) and sphalerite (ZnS) and then act to physically and biogeochemically redistribute them? 7 tributaries (Bennett and others, 1989). (2) silver-rich veins having argentifer- Physical processes 7 Total production records indicate that ous tetrahedrite [(Cu, Ag)10(Fe, Biogeochemical processes 8 this district ranks among supergiants Zn)2(As, Sb)4S13] and minor galena and Modeling of coupled physical and bio- (top 1 percent of world producers) for sphalerite.
    [Show full text]
  • HMC Fact Sheet 05102017.Indd
    May 2017 Investor Fact Sheet www.hecla-mining.com Hecla Mining Company is not only the largest and one of the lowest-cost U.S. silver producers, and the third largest U.S. producer of both zinc and lead, but also a growing gold producer. Hecla owns and operates four mines on district-sized land packages in mining-friendly North American jurisdictions: Greens Creek in Alaska, one of the largest and highest-margin primary silver mines in the world; the newly revitalized Lucky Friday silver mine in North Idaho; the San Sebastian silver-gold mine near Durango, Mexico; and the Casa Berardi gold mine in Quebec. In addition to its diversified silver and Share Performance NYSE: HL gold operating and cash-flow generating base, Hecla has a number of exploration properties and pre- end of Q1: 03/31/17, (1) as of 04/27/17 development projects in seven world-class silver and gold mining districts in the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. Share Price: $ 5.33(1) 52-Week Range: $ 3.83 – $7.64(1) 2016 saw record silver production of 17.2 million ounces with 233,929 ounces of gold production, with Basic Shares: 395.8 million silver production exceeding the Company’s expectations for 2016. The Company is suspending Lucky Fully Diluted: 399.8 million Friday and Company-wide 2017 silver production estimates, because it is unable to predict when the Market Capitalization: $ 2.11B (1) ongoing strike at the Lucky Friday mine will be resolved. Multiple Secure Revenue Streams Strong Cash Flow Flexibility Low Political Risk Jurisdictions Strong Healthy Cash Margins Investment Established Work Force Fundamentals Strong Financial Position Commitment to Safety Four High-Quality Operations Operating Mines Greens Creek – Admiralty Island, Alaska ■ One of the world’s largest and lowest-cost primary silver mines.
    [Show full text]