Expansion Patterns and Parallaxes for Planetary Nebulae? D

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Expansion Patterns and Parallaxes for Planetary Nebulae? D A&A 609, A126 (2018) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731788 & c ESO 2018 Astrophysics Expansion patterns and parallaxes for planetary nebulae? D. Schönberner1, B. Balick2, and R. Jacob1 1 Leibniz-Institut für Astrophysik Potsdam (AIP), An der Sternwarte 16, 14482 Potsdam, Germany e-mail: [email protected] 2 Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA e-mail: [email protected] Received 17 August 2017 / Accepted 25 September 2017 ABSTRACT Aims. We aim to determine individual distances to a small number of rather round, quite regularly shaped planetary nebulae by combining their angular expansion in the plane of the sky with a spectroscopically measured expansion along the line of sight. Methods. We combined up to three epochs of Hubble Space Telescope imaging data and determined the angular proper motions of rim and shell edges and of other features. These results are combined with measured expansion speeds to determine individual distances by assuming that line of sight and sky-plane expansions are equal. We employed 1D radiation-hydrodynamics simulations of nebular evolution to correct for the difference between the spectroscopically measured expansion velocities of rim and shell and of their respective shock fronts. Results. Rim and shell are two independently expanding entities, driven by different physical mechanisms, although their model- based expansion timescales are quite similar. We derive good individual distances for 15 objects, and the main results are as follows: (i) distances derived from rim and shell agree well; (ii) comparison with the statistical distances in the literature gives reasonable agreement; (iii) our distances disagree with those derived by spectroscopic methods; (iv) central-star “plateau” luminosities range from about 2000 L to well below 10 000 L , with a mean value at about 5000 L , in excellent agreement with other samples of known distance (Galactic bulge, Magellanic Clouds, and K648 in the globular cluster M 15); (v) the central-star mass range is rather restricted: from about 0.53 to about 0.56 M , with a mean value of 0.55 M . Conclusions. The expansion measurements of nebular rim and shell edges confirm the predictions of radiation-hydrodynamics simu- lations and offer a reliable method for the evaluation of distances to suited objects. Key words. planetary nebulae: general – stars: fundamental parameters – techniques: image processing – techniques: spectroscopic 1. Introduction A comprehensive discussion of commonly used methods to obtain individual distances for PNe can be found in Frew (2008). For many years long-slit Doppler studies of planetary nebulae Based on individual distances of about 120 calibrating sources, a (PNe) have shown that structures in PNe expand at mildly su- −1 new distance scale was devised which is based on the Hα-surface personic speeds of order 10−30 km s or more (see compila- brightness evolution with nebular radius. The reliability of this tions by Hajian et al. 2007; López et al. 2012; Schönberner et al. distance calibration has been supported recently by Jacob et al. 2014). Their speeds and sharp leading edges argue that the ex- (2013) by employing radiation-hydrodynamics models. An up- pansions are actually pressure-driven. In general, these veloc- 00 00 date of Frew’s 2008 calibration is given in Frew et al.(2016). ities correspond to proper motions of 0:02 to over 0:06 in a Individual distances of higher accuracy are urgently needed decade at a distance of 1 kpc. Therefore the expansion patterns of since they enable estimates of masses via the (core) mass- PNe with simple, sharp-edged features can discerned in repeated luminosity relation for post-asymptotic-giant-branch (post- high-spatial-resolution images that span a decade using geomet- AGB) stars. This mass can be compared with the mass that rically stable cameras (Liller 1965; Liller et al. 1966; Osterbrock follows from distance-independent methods, for example, from 1966; Hajian et al. 1995). As these papers highlight, the Doppler detailed spectroscopic determinations of the photospheric pa- expansion speeds divided by the corresponding angular expan- rameters by non-LTE model atmospheres and comparison with sion rates can, in principle, be combined to derive distances evolutionary tracks in the log g-Teff plane or from sophisticated to PNe using the “expansion parallax method”. Once their dis- radiation-hydrodynamical wind models which provide stellar tances are known, many intrinsic properties of the PNe and their mass, radius, and luminosity without referring to any stellar central stars (mass, luminosity, death rates, Galactic distribution) model calculations. are derivable. For the bulk of objects one has, however, to rely on statistical distance scales that depend on poorly justified as- However, radiation-hydrodynamical models of Pauldrach sumptions. Accordingly, objects with known parallax serve as et al. (2004) argued that (i) the dependence of stellar luminos- excellent calibrators. ity with mass is smaller than expected and (ii) the central stars of some well-studied PN had luminosities 4:2 < log(L=L ) < 4:5 ? Results of this paper are based on observations made with the and masses right at the Chandrasaekhar limit. The reliability of NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope in Cycle 16 (GO11122) and older their wind models have been reinforced by Kaschinski et al. data obtained from the Data Archive at the Space Telescope Science (2012) and Hoffmann et al.(2016). Because of this quite disturb- Institute, which is operated by the Association of Universities for Re- ing finding any independent determination of the distance to the search in Astronomy, Inc., under NASA contract NAS 5-26555. objects in question would be of utmost relevance not only for Article published by EDP Sciences A126, page 1 of 24 A&A 609, A126 (2018) accurate determinations of stellar properties but also for check- and 2002 with the same camera, the F658N and F502N filters, ing the complicated physics underlying stellar wind models. and similar exposure times. Table1 contains the archive log of The Hubble Space Telescope (HST) and large radio inter- all observations. ferometers with subarcsecond resolution have revolutionized ex- Only one orbit was allocated to each target. Owing to the pansion studies. Expansions and proper motions are best de- likely secular drifts of guide stars we did not endeavor to match rived from geometrically simple PNe with bright, sharp-edged the pointing direction and orientation of the telescope in both features with angular diameters of 3000 or less. Systematic ra- epochs. No dithering was used to save time. After pipeline data dial expansion patterns have been monitored from multi-epoch calibration, there are no epoch-to-epoch changes of the fluxes of HST images for NGC 6543 (Reed et al. 1999; Balick & Hajian bright field stars, and their displacements in the two epochs were 2004), BD + 30◦3639 (Akras & Steffen 2012; Li et al. 2002) and consistent with normal random proper motions. a few other PNe (Palen et al. 2002; Hajian et al. 1995). Similar Geometric corrections of both epochs are extremely impor- expansions have also been found from radio images using the tant to suppress false positive results. We applied the best avail- Very Large Array (VLA) for NGC 7027 (Zijlstra et al. 2008), able corrections appropriate for each epoch. The geometric dis- M2-42 Guzmán et al.(2006), IC 418 (Guzmán et al. 2009), and tortion of each of the cameras within WFPC2 is correctable to NGC 6881 (Guzmán-Ramírez et al. 2011). much less than a pixel except at the corners of the field of view.1 In this paper, we present HST/WFPC2 images of a dozen Most targets fitted comfortably within the PC camera. additional bright PNe with simple geometries in the emission IC 4593, NGC 3132, and NGC 7009 were too large to fit well lines of Hα, [O iii], and [N iii] to: (1) more generally characterize in the PC and, so were observed in one of the wide-field cam- the rates and patterns of the expansions of PNe, and (2) extend eras (000:10 pixel−1). NGC 3242, which marginally overfills the the measurements of expansion distances to another dozen bright PC, was reobserved in the PC since that camera was the only targets with relatively simple shapes and sharp-edged features. one available for earlier images. We did not observe IC 4593; in- The application of radiation-hydrodynamical models to stead, we used archival images from April 1999 and February high-quality multi-epoch HST images for the derivation of ac- 2007. The earlier data came from the WF camera whereas the curate distances is the primary contribution of this paper. As we PC was used for the newer images. These cameras have differ- shall see, the outer edge of a smooth shell is the simplest means ent point-spread functions (PSF). Although this complicates our to measure expansion distances. However, it is much fainter then analysis, the final results for IC 4593 (i.e. no discernible change the bright rim of the cavity inside, so its position is more poorly in size or shape) appear to be robust. defined. On the other hand, the bright rim is generally a bubble- The F502N and F658N HST images of the objects used for driven shock, a pattern that moves through the gas at a speed that our studies have all been published previously (mostly in Hajian may not represent that of the gas inside it. Where possible we et al. 2007) along with long-slit échelle observations along sev- measure the expansion rates of both features and use our models eral cuts through the nebula and simple models of their shapes. to convert the shock pattern motions into true gas motions. The images are also found in AppendixB. This paper is organised as follows: in Sect.
Recommended publications
  • Planetary Nebulae
    Planetary Nebulae A planetary nebula is a kind of emission nebula consisting of an expanding, glowing shell of ionized gas ejected from old red giant stars late in their lives. The term "planetary nebula" is a misnomer that originated in the 1780s with astronomer William Herschel because when viewed through his telescope, these objects appeared to him to resemble the rounded shapes of planets. Herschel's name for these objects was popularly adopted and has not been changed. They are a relatively short-lived phenomenon, lasting a few tens of thousands of years, compared to a typical stellar lifetime of several billion years. The mechanism for formation of most planetary nebulae is thought to be the following: at the end of the star's life, during the red giant phase, the outer layers of the star are expelled by strong stellar winds. Eventually, after most of the red giant's atmosphere is dissipated, the exposed hot, luminous core emits ultraviolet radiation to ionize the ejected outer layers of the star. Absorbed ultraviolet light energizes the shell of nebulous gas around the central star, appearing as a bright colored planetary nebula at several discrete visible wavelengths. Planetary nebulae may play a crucial role in the chemical evolution of the Milky Way, returning material to the interstellar medium from stars where elements, the products of nucleosynthesis (such as carbon, nitrogen, oxygen and neon), have been created. Planetary nebulae are also observed in more distant galaxies, yielding useful information about their chemical abundances. In recent years, Hubble Space Telescope images have revealed many planetary nebulae to have extremely complex and varied morphologies.
    [Show full text]
  • A Basic Requirement for Studying the Heavens Is Determining Where In
    Abasic requirement for studying the heavens is determining where in the sky things are. To specify sky positions, astronomers have developed several coordinate systems. Each uses a coordinate grid projected on to the celestial sphere, in analogy to the geographic coordinate system used on the surface of the Earth. The coordinate systems differ only in their choice of the fundamental plane, which divides the sky into two equal hemispheres along a great circle (the fundamental plane of the geographic system is the Earth's equator) . Each coordinate system is named for its choice of fundamental plane. The equatorial coordinate system is probably the most widely used celestial coordinate system. It is also the one most closely related to the geographic coordinate system, because they use the same fun­ damental plane and the same poles. The projection of the Earth's equator onto the celestial sphere is called the celestial equator. Similarly, projecting the geographic poles on to the celest ial sphere defines the north and south celestial poles. However, there is an important difference between the equatorial and geographic coordinate systems: the geographic system is fixed to the Earth; it rotates as the Earth does . The equatorial system is fixed to the stars, so it appears to rotate across the sky with the stars, but of course it's really the Earth rotating under the fixed sky. The latitudinal (latitude-like) angle of the equatorial system is called declination (Dec for short) . It measures the angle of an object above or below the celestial equator. The longitud inal angle is called the right ascension (RA for short).
    [Show full text]
  • Gravity Distances of Planetary Nebulae Ii. Application to a Sample of Galactic Objects
    GRAVITY DISTANCES OF PLANETARY NEBULAE II. APPLICATION TO A SAMPLE OF GALACTIC OBJECTS J. O. CAZETTA and W. J. MACIEL Instituto Astronômico e Geofísico da USP, Av. Miguel Stefano 4200, 04301-904 São Paulo SP, Brazil (Received 7 April 1999; accepted 28 October 1999) 1. Introduction The main results on the difficult problem of distance determination for planetary nebulae in the last few years derive from the application of trigonometric parallaxes (Harris et al. 1997), radio expansion method (Hajian et al., 1993, 1995) and Hippar- cos distances (Pottasch and Acker 1998, see also Terzian, 1993, 1997). However, these methods are necessarily restricted to a few objects, which remain a small fraction of the known population of galactic PN, estimated as around 1800 true and possible PN (Acker 1997). Therefore, there is still a need for the development of statistical methods, which may be applicable to a larger number of objects, even though at the cost of a lower accuracy. One such method is the so-called gravity distance method, proposed by Maciel and Cazetta (1997, hereafter referred to as Paper I). According to this method, an approximate range of progenitor masses can be attributed to the different PN types of the Peimbert classification scheme (Peimbert 1978, Peimbert and Torres- Peimbert 1983). Using theoretical initial mass-final mass relationships, the central star mass can be obtained. On the other hand, relations involving the surface gravity as a function of the central star temperature can also be derived for a given stellar mass, so that the luminosities of the central stars are obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of Excitation Classes P for 750 Galactic Planetary Nebulae
    Catalogue of Excitation Classes p for 750 Galactic Planetary Nebulae Name p Name p Name p Name p NeC 40 1 Nee 6072 9 NeC 6881 10 IC 4663 11 NeC 246 12+ Nee 6153 3 NeC 6884 7 IC 4673 10 NeC 650-1 10 Nee 6210 4 NeC 6886 9 IC 4699 9 NeC 1360 12 Nee 6302 10 Nee 6891 4 IC 4732 5 NeC 1501 10 Nee 6309 10 NeC 6894 10 IC 4776 2 NeC 1514 8 NeC 6326 9 Nee 6905 11 IC 4846 3 NeC 1535 8 Nee 6337 11 Nee 7008 11 IC 4997 8 NeC 2022 12 Nee 6369 4 NeC 7009 7 IC 5117 6 NeC 2242 12+ NeC 6439 8 NeC 7026 9 IC 5148-50 6 NeC 2346 9 NeC 6445 10 Nee 7027 11 IC 5217 6 NeC 2371-2 12 Nee 6537 11 Nee 7048 11 Al 1 NeC 2392 10 NeC 6543 5 Nee 7094 12 A2 10 NeC 2438 10 NeC 6563 8 NeC 7139 9 A4 10 NeC 2440 10 NeC 6565 7 NeC 7293 7 A 12 4 NeC 2452 10 NeC 6567 4 Nee 7354 10 A 15 12+ NeC 2610 12 NeC 6572 7 NeC 7662 10 A 20 12+ NeC 2792 11 NeC 6578 2 Ie 289 12 A 21 1 NeC 2818 11 NeC 6620 8 IC 351 10 A 23 4 NeC 2867 9 NeC 6629 5 Ie 418 1 A 24 1 NeC 2899 10 Nee 6644 7 IC 972 10 A 30 12+ NeC 3132 9 NeC 6720 10 IC 1295 10 A 33 11 NeC 3195 9 NeC 6741 9 IC 1297 9 A 35 1 NeC 3211 10 NeC 6751 9 Ie 1454 10 A 36 12+ NeC 3242 9 Nee 6765 10 IC1747 9 A 40 2 NeC 3587 8 NeC 6772 9 IC 2003 10 A 41 1 NeC 3699 9 NeC 6778 9 IC 2149 2 A 43 2 NeC 3918 9 NeC 6781 8 IC 2165 10 A 46 2 NeC 4071 11 NeC 6790 4 IC 2448 9 A 49 4 NeC 4361 12+ NeC 6803 5 IC 2501 3 A 50 10 NeC 5189 10 NeC 6804 12 IC 2553 8 A 51 12 NeC 5307 9 NeC 6807 4 IC 2621 9 A 54 12 NeC 5315 2 NeC 6818 10 Ie 3568 3 A 55 4 NeC 5873 10 NeC 6826 11 Ie 4191 6 A 57 3 NeC 5882 6 NeC 6833 2 Ie 4406 4 A 60 2 NeC 5879 12 NeC 6842 2 IC 4593 6 A
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of the Masses of Planetary Nebula Nuclei Derived from Different Methods
    ACTA ASTRONOMICA Vol. 43 (1993) pp. 371±380 Comparison of the Masses of Planetary Nebula Nuclei Derived from Different Methods by ; S.K. G o r n y 1;2 , R. Tylenda1 2 , and G.Stasi nska 2 1 Copernicus Astronomical Center, Chopina 12/18, PL-87100 ToruÂn, Poland 2 DAEC, Observatoire de Paris-Meudon, F-92195 Meudon CÂedex, France ABSTRACT We present some results of an extensive and uniform analysis of the planetary nebula nuclei from samples examined by Mendez et al. and Gathier and Pottasch. The present study uses distance independent diagrams. The theoretical tracks have been modi®ed so that they can be directly compared in the diagrams to the observed central star positions. From this comparison the central star masses have been derived. Our results are in contradiction with those from the above cited studies. Possible explanations of the differences are presented. 1. Introduction During recent years numerous studies of the masses of planetary nebula nuclei (PNN) have been undertaken. Most of the authors have come to more or less the same general conclusion, i.e. thatthe PNNmasses are concentrated around0.60M and have a strong cutoff at 0.55 M (SchonbernerÈ 1981, Kaler 1983, Heap and Augensen 1987, Szczerba 1987, 1990, Weidemann 1989, Tylenda and Stasinska 1989, Stasinska and Tylenda 1990, Kaler et al. 1990, Kaler and Jacoby 1990, 1991, Dopita and Meathernigham 1991, Tylenda et al. 1991, Zhang and Kwok 1993). The principal controversy concerns the proportion of massive PNN. Some authors ®nd that the number of PNN above 0.7 M is negligible (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Electron Density in Planetary Nebulae
    A&A 382, 282–290 (2002) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20011621 & c ESO 2002 Astrophysics Study of electron density in planetary nebulae A comparison of different density indicators M. V. F. Copetti1,2 and B. C. Writzl1 1 Laborat´orio de An´alise Num´erica e Astrof´ısica, Departamento de Matem´atica, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, 97119-900 Santa Maria, RS, Brazil 2 Physics Department, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati OH 45221-0011, USA Received 29 August 2001 / Accepted 7 November 2001 Abstract. We present a comparison of electron density estimates for planetary nebulae based on different emission- line ratios. We have considered the density indicators [O ii]λ3729/λ3726, [S ii]λ6716/λ6731, [Cl iii]λ5517/λ5537, [Ar iv]λ4711/λ4740, C iii]λ1906/λ1909 and [N i]λ5202/λ5199. The observational data were extracted from the literature. We have found systematic deviations from the density homogeneous models, in the sense that: Ne(N i) ∼< Ne(O ii) <Ne(S ii, C iii, Cl iii or Ar iv)andNe(S ii) ≈ Ne(C iii) ≈ Ne(Cl iii) ≈ Ne(Ar iv). We argue that the lower [O ii] density estimates are likely due to errors in the atomic parameters used. Key words. ISM: planetary nebulae 1. Introduction have found the opposite, i.e., [O ii] densities systemati- cally higher than [S ii] ones. More recently, Keenan et al. The electron density, Ne, is one of the key physical pa- (1996, 1997, 1999), based on data from the series of high rameters needed to characterise a planetary nebula. Some spectral resolution observations of planetary nebulae by density assessment is necessary to confidently derive the Hyung, Aller and collaborators (see references in Sect.
    [Show full text]
  • 7.5 X 11.5.Threelines.P65
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-19267-5 - Observing and Cataloguing Nebulae and Star Clusters: From Herschel to Dreyer’s New General Catalogue Wolfgang Steinicke Index More information Name index The dates of birth and death, if available, for all 545 people (astronomers, telescope makers etc.) listed here are given. The data are mainly taken from the standard work Biographischer Index der Astronomie (Dick, Brüggenthies 2005). Some information has been added by the author (this especially concerns living twentieth-century astronomers). Members of the families of Dreyer, Lord Rosse and other astronomers (as mentioned in the text) are not listed. For obituaries see the references; compare also the compilations presented by Newcomb–Engelmann (Kempf 1911), Mädler (1873), Bode (1813) and Rudolf Wolf (1890). Markings: bold = portrait; underline = short biography. Abbe, Cleveland (1838–1916), 222–23, As-Sufi, Abd-al-Rahman (903–986), 164, 183, 229, 256, 271, 295, 338–42, 466 15–16, 167, 441–42, 446, 449–50, 455, 344, 346, 348, 360, 364, 367, 369, 393, Abell, George Ogden (1927–1983), 47, 475, 516 395, 395, 396–404, 406, 410, 415, 248 Austin, Edward P. (1843–1906), 6, 82, 423–24, 436, 441, 446, 448, 450, 455, Abbott, Francis Preserved (1799–1883), 335, 337, 446, 450 458–59, 461–63, 470, 477, 481, 483, 517–19 Auwers, Georg Friedrich Julius Arthur v. 505–11, 513–14, 517, 520, 526, 533, Abney, William (1843–1920), 360 (1838–1915), 7, 10, 12, 14–15, 26–27, 540–42, 548–61 Adams, John Couch (1819–1892), 122, 47, 50–51, 61, 65, 68–69, 88, 92–93,
    [Show full text]
  • Binocular Challenges
    This page intentionally left blank Cosmic Challenge Listing more than 500 sky targets, both near and far, in 187 challenges, this observing guide will test novice astronomers and advanced veterans alike. Its unique mix of Solar System and deep-sky targets will have observers hunting for the Apollo lunar landing sites, searching for satellites orbiting the outermost planets, and exploring hundreds of star clusters, nebulae, distant galaxies, and quasars. Each target object is accompanied by a rating indicating how difficult the object is to find, an in-depth visual description, an illustration showing how the object realistically looks, and a detailed finder chart to help you find each challenge quickly and effectively. The guide introduces objects often overlooked in other observing guides and features targets visible in a variety of conditions, from the inner city to the dark countryside. Challenges are provided for viewing by the naked eye, through binoculars, to the largest backyard telescopes. Philip S. Harrington is the author of eight previous books for the amateur astronomer, including Touring the Universe through Binoculars, Star Ware, and Star Watch. He is also a contributing editor for Astronomy magazine, where he has authored the magazine’s monthly “Binocular Universe” column and “Phil Harrington’s Challenge Objects,” a quarterly online column on Astronomy.com. He is an Adjunct Professor at Dowling College and Suffolk County Community College, New York, where he teaches courses in stellar and planetary astronomy. Cosmic Challenge The Ultimate Observing List for Amateurs PHILIP S. HARRINGTON CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, Sao˜ Paulo, Delhi, Dubai, Tokyo, Mexico City Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 8RU, UK Published in the United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521899369 C P.
    [Show full text]
  • Making a Sky Atlas
    Appendix A Making a Sky Atlas Although a number of very advanced sky atlases are now available in print, none is likely to be ideal for any given task. Published atlases will probably have too few or too many guide stars, too few or too many deep-sky objects plotted in them, wrong- size charts, etc. I found that with MegaStar I could design and make, specifically for my survey, a “just right” personalized atlas. My atlas consists of 108 charts, each about twenty square degrees in size, with guide stars down to magnitude 8.9. I used only the northernmost 78 charts, since I observed the sky only down to –35°. On the charts I plotted only the objects I wanted to observe. In addition I made enlargements of small, overcrowded areas (“quad charts”) as well as separate large-scale charts for the Virgo Galaxy Cluster, the latter with guide stars down to magnitude 11.4. I put the charts in plastic sheet protectors in a three-ring binder, taking them out and plac- ing them on my telescope mount’s clipboard as needed. To find an object I would use the 35 mm finder (except in the Virgo Cluster, where I used the 60 mm as the finder) to point the ensemble of telescopes at the indicated spot among the guide stars. If the object was not seen in the 35 mm, as it usually was not, I would then look in the larger telescopes. If the object was not immediately visible even in the primary telescope – a not uncommon occur- rence due to inexact initial pointing – I would then scan around for it.
    [Show full text]
  • The 3-D Ionization Structure of the Planetary Nebula NGC6565
    1 Abstract. A detailed study of the planetary nebula NGC 6565 has been carried out on long-slit echellograms (λ/∆λ=60000, spectral range=λλ3900–7750A)˚ at six, equally spaced position angles. The expansion velocity field, the c(Hβ) distribution and the radial profile of the physical conditions (electron temperature and density) are obtained. The distance, radius, mass and filling factor of the nebula and the temperature and luminosity of the cen- tral star are derived. The radial ionization structure is analyzed using both the classical method and the photo- ionization code CLOUDY. Moreover, we present the spa- tial structure in a series of images from different directions, allowing the reader to “see” the nebula in 3-D. NGC 6565 results to be a young (2000–2500 years), patchy, optically thick triaxial ellipsoid (a=10.1 arcsec, a/b=1.4, a/c=1.7) projected almost pole-on. The matter close to major axis was swept-up by some accelerating agent (fast wind? ion- ization? magnetic fields?), forming two faint and asym- metric polar cups. A large cocoon of almost neutral gas completely embeds the ionized nebula. NGC 6565 is in a recombination phase, because of the luminosity drop of the massive powering star, which is reaching the white dwarf domain (logT∗ ≃5.08 K; logL∗/L⊙ ≃2.0). The stel- lar decline started about 1000 years ago, but the main nebula remained optically thin for other 600 years before the recombination phase occurred. In the near future the ionization front will re-grow, since the dilution factor due to the expansion will prevail on the slower and slower stel- lar decline.
    [Show full text]
  • Angular Dimensions of Planetary Nebulae?
    A&A 405, 627–637 (2003) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20030645 & c ESO 2003 Astrophysics Angular dimensions of planetary nebulae? R. Tylenda1,N.Si´odmiak1,S.K.G´orny1,R.L.M.Corradi2, and H. E. Schwarz3 1 N. Copernicus Astronomical Center, Department for Astrophysics, Rabia´nska 8, 87–100 Toru´n, Poland 2 Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes, Apartado de Correos 321, 38700 Sta. Cruz de La Palma, Spain 3 CTIO/NOAO, Casilla 603, La Serena, Chile Received 28 May 2002 / Accepted 23 April 2003 Abstract. We have measured angular dimensions of 312 planetary nebulae from their images obtained in Hα (or Hα + [NII]). We have applied three methods of measurements: direct measurements at the 10% level of the peak surface brightness, Gaussian deconvolution and second-moment deconvolution. The results from the three methods are compared and analysed. We propose a simple deconvolution of the 10% level measurements which significantly improves the reliability of these measurements for compact and partially resolved nebulae. Gaussian deconvolution gives consistent but somewhat underestimated diameters compared to the 10% measurements. Second-moment deconvolution gives results in poor agreement with those from the other two methods, especially for poorly resolved nebulae. From the results of measurements and using the conclusions of our analysis we derive the final nebular diameters which should be free from systematic differences between small (partially resolved) and extended (well resolved) objects in our sample. Key words. planetary nebulae: general 1. Introduction different results for many PNe. In the case of well resolved and fairly symmetric nebulae with a well defined outer rim the The angular dimensions belong to the most fundamental obser- problem is simple and different methods give consistent results.
    [Show full text]
  • 100 Brightest Planetary Nebulae
    100 BRIGHTEST PLANETARY NEBULAE 100 BRIGHTEST PLANETARY NEBULAE 1 100 BRIGHTEST PLANETARY NEBULAE Visual Magnitude (brightest to least bright) Name Common Name Visual Magnitude Stellar Magnitude Angular Size Constellation NGC 7293 Helix Nebula 7 13.5 900 Aquarius NGC 6853 Dumbbell Nebula (M27) 7.5 13.9 330 Vulpecula NGC 3918 Blue Planetary 8 ? 16 Centaurus NGC 7009 Saturn Nebula 8 12.8 28 Aquarius NGC 3132 Eight‐Burst Planetary 8.5 10.1 45 Vela NGC 6543 Cat's Eye Nebula 8.5 11.1 20 Draco NGC 246 Skull Nebula 8.5 12 225 Cetus NGC 6572 Blue Raquetball Nebula 8.5 13.6 14 Ophiuchus NGC 6210 Turtle Nebula 9 12.7 16 Hercules NGC 6720 Ring Nebula (M57) 9 15.3 70 Lyra NGC 7027 Magic Carpet Nebula 9 16.3 14 Cygnus NGC 7662 Blue Snowball Nebula 9 13.2 20 Andromeda NGC 1360 Robin's Egg Nebula 9.5 11.4 380 Fornax NGC 1535 Cleopatra's Eye Nebula 9.5 12.2 18 Eridanus NGC 2392 Eskimo/Clown Face Nebula 9.5 10.5 45 Gemini NGC 2867 Royal Aqua Nebula 9.5 16.6 15 Carina NGC 3242 Ghost of Jupiter Nebula 9.5 12.3 40 Hydra NGC 6826 Blinking Planetary Nebula 9.5 10.4 25 Cygnus IC 418 Spirograph Nebula 10 10.2 12 Lepus NGC 5189 Spiral Planetary Nebula 10 14.9 140 Musca NGC 5882 Green Snowball Nebula 10 13.4 14 Lupus NGC 6818 Little Gem Nebula 10 16.9 18 Sagittarius NGC 40 Bow Tie Nebula 10.5 11.6 36 Cepheus NGC 1514 Crystal Ball Nebula 10.5 9.4 120 Taurus NGC 2346 Butterfly Nebula 10.5 11.5 55 Monoceros NGC 2438 Smoke Ring in M46 10.5 17.7 70 Puppis NGC 2440 Peanut Nebula 10.5 17.7 30 Puppis NGC 4361 Raven's Eye Nebula 10.5 13.2 100 Corvus IC 4406 Retina Nebula
    [Show full text]