Elections Bill
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Elections Bill Explanatory Notes
ELECTIONS BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES What these notes do These Explanatory Notes relate to the Elections Bill as introduced in the House of Commons on 5 July 2021 (Bill 138). ● These Explanatory Notes have been provided by the Cabinet Office in order to assist the reader of the Bill. They do not form part of the Bill and have not been endorsed by Parliament. ● These Explanatory Notes explain what each part of the Bill will mean in practice; provide background information on the development of policy; and provide additional information on how the Bill will affect existing legislation in this area. ● These Explanatory Notes might best be read alongside the Bill. They are not, and are not intended to be, a comprehensive description of the Bill. Bill 138–EN 58/2 Table of Contents Subject Page of these Notes Overview of the Bill 3 Policy Background 5 Legal background 19 Territorial Extent and Application 22 Commentary on Provisions of Bill 25 Part 1: Administration and Conduct of Elections 25 Voter Identification 25 Postal and Proxy Voting 35 Undue Influence 46 Assistance with voting for persons with disabilities 51 Northern Ireland elections 52 Part 2: Overseas Electors and EU Citizens 62 Overseas Electors 62 Clause 10: Extension of franchise for parliamentary elections: British citizens overseas 62 Voting and Candidacy Rights of EU citizens 69 Clause 11: Voting and Candidacy Rights of EU citizens 69 Part 3: The Electoral Commission 84 The Electoral Commission 84 Criminal Proceedings 87 Part 4: Regulation of Expenditure 88 Notional expenditure -
4.3 Presidential Government
11 MM VENKATESHWARA COMPARATIVE POLITICAL OPEN UNIVERSITY SYSTEMS www.vou.ac.in COMPARATIVE POLITICAL SYSTEMS POLITICAL COMPARATIVE COMPARATIVE POLITICAL SYSTEMS MA [POLITICAL SCIENCE] [MAPS-105] VENKATESHWARA OPEN UNIVERSITYwww.vou.ac.in COMPARATIVE POLITICAL SYSTEMS MA [Political Science] MAPS 105 BOARD OF STUDIES Prof Lalit Kumar Sagar Vice Chancellor Dr. S. Raman Iyer Director Directorate of Distance Education SUBJECT EXPERT Ms. Puppy Gyadi Assistant Professor CO-ORDINATOR Mr. Tauha Khan Registrar Authors Dr Biswaranjan Mohanty: Units (3.3, 6.2, 7.2-7.3) © Dr Biswaranjan Mohanty, 2019 Vikas Publishing House: Units (1, 2, 3.0-3.2, 3.4-3.10, 4, 5, 6.0-6.1, 6.3-6.9, 7.0-7.1, 7.4-7.9, 8, 9, 10) © Reserved, 2019 All rights reserved. No part of this publication which is material protected by this copyright notice may be reproduced or transmitted or utilized or stored in any form or by any means now known or hereinafter invented, electronic, digital or mechanical, including photocopying, scanning, recording or by any information storage or retrieval system, without prior written permission from the Publisher. Information contained in this book has been published by VIKAS® Publishing House Pvt. Ltd. and has been obtained by its Authors from sources believed to be reliable and are correct to the best of their knowledge. However, the Publisher and its Authors shall in no event be liable for any errors, omissions or damages arising out of use of this information and specifically disclaim any implied warranties or merchantability or fitness for any particular use. Vikas® is the registered trademark of Vikas® Publishing House Pvt. -
The Local Authorities (Conduct of Referendums) (Wales) Regulations 2008
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE LOCAL AUTHORITIES (CONDUCT OF REFERENDUMS) (WALES) REGULATIONS 2008 This Explanatory Memorandum has been prepared by the Local Government Policy Division and is laid before the National Assembly for Wales. PART 1 1. Description 1.1 This Instrument provides for the organisation of the holding of a referendum in a local authority in Wales to decide whether that authority should adopt a political structure involving (amongst others) a directly elected mayor. The Instrument provides for the questions to be put to the electorate, the publicity for a referendum, limits on expenditure, the conduct of the local authority concerned, plus the manner of voting, counting and matters connected with the register. 2. Matters of special interest to the Subordinate Legislation Committee 2.1 None. 3. Legislative Background 3.1 The powers enabling this Instrument to be made are contained in sections 45, 105 and 106 of the Local Government Act 2000. The functions of the National Assembly for Wales under these provisions have been transferred to the Welsh Ministers by virtue of section 162 of, and paragraph 30 of, Schedule 11 to the Government of Wales Act 2006. The Instrument is being made using the affirmative resolution procedure. 4. Purpose and intended effect of the legislation 4.1 This Instrument will revoke and replace, with appropriate amendments, The Local Authorities (Conduct of Referendums) (Wales) Regulations 2004 (SI No 870 (W.85)) (the 2004 Regulations). The principal changes made in these draft Regulations are to implement the changes made by the Electoral Administration Act 2006, which, inter alia, introduces measures to prevent electoral fraud. -
Electoral Law an Interim Report
Electoral Law An Interim Report 4 February 2016 Law Commission Scottish Law Commission Northern Ireland Law Commission ELECTORAL LAW A Joint Interim Report © Crown copyright 2016 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence: visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3; or write to Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU; or email [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information, you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/electoral-law/ www.scotlawcom.gov.uk ii THE LAW COMMISSIONS The Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission were set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965. The Northern Ireland Law Commission was set up by section 50 of the Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002. Each Commission has the purpose of promoting reform of the law. The Law Commissioners for England and Wales are: The Right Honourable Lord Justice Bean, Chairman Professor Nick Hopkins Stephen Lewis Professor David Ormerod QC Nicholas Paines QC The Chief Executive is Elaine Lorimer The Scottish Law Commissioners are: The Honourable Lord Pentland, Chairman Caroline Drummond David Johnston QC Professor Hector L MacQueen Dr Andrew J M Steven The Chief Executive is Malcolm McMillan The Chairman of the Northern Ireland Law Commission is: The Honourable Mr Justice Maguire The terms of -
Environment Bill Explanatory Notes
ENVIRONMENT BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES What these notes do These Explanatory Notes relate to the Environment Bill as brought from the House of Commons on 26 May 2021 (HL Bill 16). • These Explanatory Notes have been prepared by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) in order to assist the reader of the Bill and to help inform debate on it. They do not form part of the Bill and have not been endorsed by Parliament. • These Explanatory Notes explain what each part of the Bill will mean in practice; provide background information on the development of policy; and provide additional information on how the Bill will affect existing legislation in this area. • These Explanatory Notes might best be read alongside the Bill. They are not, and are not intended to be, a comprehensive description of the Bill. HL Bill 16–EN 58/2 Table of Contents Subject Page of these Notes Overview of the Bill 9 Policy background 13 Exiting the European Union (EU) 13 Part 1: Environmental Governance 13 Part 2: Environmental Governance: Northern Ireland 14 Part 3: Waste and Resource Efficiency 15 Part 4: Air Quality and Environmental Recall 16 Part 5: Water 17 Part 6: Nature and Biodiversity 18 Part 7: Conservation Covenants 19 Part 8: Miscellaneous and General Provisions 20 Legal background 20 Territorial extent and application 21 Commentary on provisions of Bill 23 Part 1: Environmental Governance 23 Chapter 1: Improving the natural environment 23 Clause 1: Environmental targets 23 Clause 2: Environmental targets: particulate matter 24 Clause -
The State of the Right to Vote After the 2012 Election
S. HRG. 112–794 THE STATE OF THE RIGHT TO VOTE AFTER THE 2012 ELECTION HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION DECEMBER 19, 2012 Serial No. J–112–96 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 81–713 PDF WASHINGTON : 2013 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont, Chairman HERB KOHL, Wisconsin CHUCK GRASSLEY, Iowa DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah CHUCK SCHUMER, New York JON KYL, Arizona DICK DURBIN, Illinois JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, Rhode Island LINDSEY GRAHAM, South Carolina AMY KLOBUCHAR, Minnesota JOHN CORNYN, Texas AL FRANKEN, Minnesota MICHAEL S. LEE, Utah CHRISTOPHER A. COONS, Delaware TOM COBURN, Oklahoma RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, Connecticut BRUCE A. COHEN, Chief Counsel and Staff Director KOLAN DAVIS, Republican Chief Counsel and Staff Director (II) C O N T E N T S STATEMENTS OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS Page Coons, Hon. Christopher A., a U.S. Senator from the State of Delaware ........... 6 Durbin, Hon. Dick, a U.S. Senator from the State of Illinois .............................. 4 Grassley, Hon. Chuck, a U.S. Senator from the State of Iowa ............................ 3 Leahy, Hon. Patrick J., a U.S. Senator from the State of Vermont .................... 1 prepared statement .......................................................................................... 178 Whitehouse, Hon. Sheldon, a U.S. Senator from the State of Rhode Island ..... -
Legislation (Wales) Act 2019, Section 3
Changes to legislation: There are currently no known outstanding effects for the Legislation (Wales) Act 2019, Section 3. (See end of Document for details) Legislation (Wales) Act 2019 2019 anaw 4 PART 2 INTERPRETATION AND OPERATION OF WELSH LEGISLATION Application and effect of Part 3 Legislation to which this Part applies (1) This Part applies to— (a) this Act; (b) [F1Acts of Senedd Cymru] that receive Royal Assent on or after [F21 January 2020]; (c) Welsh subordinate instruments that are made on or after [F31 January 2020]. (2) “Welsh subordinate instrument” means an instrument (whether or not that instrument is a statutory instrument) containing only one or both of the following— (a) subordinate legislation that is made under an [F4Act of Senedd Cymru] or an Assembly Measure, whether by the Welsh Ministers or by any other person; (b) subordinate legislation that— (i) is made under an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom or retained direct EU legislation, (ii) is made only by the Welsh Ministers or any other devolved Welsh authority (within the meaning given by section 157A of the Government of Wales Act 2006 (c. 32)), and (iii) applies only in relation to Wales. (3) References in the rest of this Part to an [F4Act of Senedd Cymru] or a Welsh subordinate instrument are (unless otherwise provided) references to an [F4Act of Senedd Cymru] or Welsh subordinate instrument to which this Part applies by virtue of subsection (1). [F5(4) In relation to subordinate legislation that relates to fishing, fisheries or fish health and is made after section 45 of the Fisheries Act 2020 (c. -
Electoral Law an Interim Report
Electoral Law An Interim Report 4 February 2016 Law Commission Scottish Law Commission Northern Ireland Law Commission ELECTORAL LAW A Joint Interim Report © Crown copyright 2016 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence: visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3; or write to Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU; or email [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information, you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.lawcom.gov.uk/project/electoral-law/ www.scotlawcom.gov.uk ii THE LAW COMMISSIONS The Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission were set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965. The Northern Ireland Law Commission was set up by section 50 of the Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002. Each Commission has the purpose of promoting reform of the law. The Law Commissioners for England and Wales are: The Right Honourable Lord Justice Bean, Chairman Professor Nick Hopkins Stephen Lewis Professor David Ormerod QC Nicholas Paines QC The Chief Executive is Elaine Lorimer The Scottish Law Commissioners are: The Honourable Lord Pentland, Chairman Caroline Drummond David Johnston QC Professor Hector L MacQueen Dr Andrew J M Steven The Chief Executive is Malcolm McMillan The Chairman of the Northern Ireland Law Commission is: The Honourable Mr Justice Maguire The terms of -
Procedural Fairness in Election Contests
University of Kentucky UKnowledge Law Faculty Scholarly Articles Law Faculty Publications 2013 Procedural Fairness in Election Contests Joshua A. Douglas University of Kentucky College of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/law_facpub Part of the Election Law Commons Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Joshua A. Douglas, Procedural Fairness in Election Contests, 88 Ind. L.J. 1 (2013). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Faculty Publications at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law Faculty Scholarly Articles by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Procedural Fairness in Election Contests Notes/Citation Information Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 88, No. 1 (2013), pp. 1-81 This article is available at UKnowledge: https://uknowledge.uky.edu/law_facpub/278 Procedural Fairness in Election Contests JOSHUA A. DOUGLAS* INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 I. ELECTION CONTESTS BY TYPE OF ELECTION .............................................................. 5 A. ELECTION CONTESTS INVOLVING STATE LEGISLATIVE OFFICES ...................... 5 B. ELECTION CONTESTS INVOLVING GOVERNOR AND LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR ................................................................................. 9 C. ELECTION CONTESTS INVOLVING -
Election Contests and the Electoral Vote
Volume 65 Issue 4 Dickinson Law Review - Volume 65, 1960-1961 6-1-1961 Election Contests and the Electoral Vote L. Kinvin Wroth Follow this and additional works at: https://ideas.dickinsonlaw.psu.edu/dlra Recommended Citation L. K. Wroth, Election Contests and the Electoral Vote, 65 DICK. L. REV. 321 (1961). Available at: https://ideas.dickinsonlaw.psu.edu/dlra/vol65/iss4/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews at Dickinson Law IDEAS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dickinson Law Review by an authorized editor of Dickinson Law IDEAS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ELECTION CONTESTS AND THE ELECTORAL VOTE BY L. KINVIN WROTH* The extremely close presidential election of 1960 stirred a problem that has long lain dormant. As the result of a recount of the popular vote in Hawaii, Congress, in its joint meeting to count the electoral vote, was presented with conflicting returns from a state for the first time since the Hayes-Tilden controversy of 1877. Since the outcome of the election was not affected, the joint meeting accepted the result of the recount proceeding, and the votes given by Hawaii's Democratic electors were counted.' The once fiercely agitated question of the location and nature of the power to decide controversies concerning the electoral vote was thus avoided. This question, arising from an ambiguity in the Constitution, has long been deemed settled by the statutory provisions for the count of the electoral vote made in the aftermath of the Hayes-Tilden controversy.2 The system for resolving electoral disputes which this legislation embodies has never been tested, however. -
Emergency Employment Proxy Vote Application Form
Application to vote by emergency proxy based on occupation, service or employment Voting by proxy Proxy voting means that if you aren’t able to cast your vote in person, you can have someone you trust cast your vote for you. If you are not able to attend the polling station in person for reasons relating to your occupation, service or employment, and you only become aware of this after 5pm, on the sixth working day before the poll, you can apply to vote by emergency proxy (someone else voting on your behalf). You can apply up until 5pm on the day of the poll. This form should not be used if you have been detained in a hospital under Section 145 of the Mental Health Act 1983 in England and Wales or Section 329 of the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003 in Scotland. Both you and your proxy must be registered and eligible to vote. A person can only be a proxy for close relatives and up to two other people at an election or referendum. Close relatives are the spouse, civil partner, parent, grandparent, brother, sister, child or grandchild of the applicant. How do I apply to vote by proxy? You must ask someone who is willing and capable to be your proxy and vote on your behalf. Unless you are registered to vote as a service voter or anonymous elector, you must get an appropriate person to sign your application. See notes below for information on who can support your application. Make sure all sections of the form are complete and supply your date of birth and signature. -
(Anonymous Electors) Regulations 2008 No.2869
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE POLITICAL DONATIONS AND REGULATED TRANSACTIONS (ANONYMOUS ELECTORS) REGULATIONS 2008 2008 No. 2869 1. This explanatory memorandum has been prepared by the Ministry of Justice and is laid before Parliament by Command of Her Majesty. 2. Purpose of the instrument 2.1 The Regulations prescribe the form of evidence required from an elector who is registered anonymously in an electoral register who wishes to make a loan or donation to a political party. 3. Matters of special interest to the Select Committee on Statutory Instruments 3.1 None 4. Legislative Context 4.1 Political parties may only accept donations and loans from an individual if that person is registered in an electoral register. The Electoral Administration Act 2006 (c.22) established a framework for anonymous registration, allowing a registration officer to create an anonymous entry on the electoral register for a person whose safety, or that of people they live with, would be at risk if the register contained their name and address. The Representation of the People (England and Wales) Regulations 2001 (S.I.2001/341) and the Representation of the People (Scotland) Regulations 2001 (S.I.2001/497) provide that when a person has been entered on the register as an anonymous elector they are issued with a certificate of anonymous registration. The Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (c.41) provides that when reporting a donation or loan from an anonymously registered elector to the Electoral Commission a political party must state that it has seen evidence that the elector has an anonymous entry in the electoral register and provide a copy of that evidence.