30 Strong 2007
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Enhanced Oil Recovery Using CO2 in Alaska
geosciences Review Enhanced Oil Recovery Using CO2 in Alaska Banabas Dogah *, Vahid Atashbari , Mohabbat Ahmadi and Brent Sheets Department of Petroleum Engineering, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 1764 Tanana Loop, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA; [email protected] (V.A.); [email protected] (M.A.); [email protected] (B.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Alaska holds more than 68 billion barrels of proved oil reserves and more than 36.7 trillion cubic feet of proved natural gas reserves with some special conditions such as proximity to permafrost, making Alaskan petroleum reserves unique. The low temperature in shallow reservoirs prohibited hydrocarbons’ ideal maturation, thereby generating several heavy and viscous oil accumulations in this state. This also limits the enhanced oil recovery (EOR) options, leaving the thermal methods off the table to avoid permafrost thawing, which can cause wellbore collapse. Several solutions have been attempted for improving oil production from heavy and viscous oil in Alaska; however, they have not yielded the desired recovery, and ultimate recovery factors are still less than the global average. One solution identified as a better alternative is using CO2 as an injecting fluid, alternated by water or mixed with other injectants. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of all studies on using CO2 for enhanced oil recovery purposes in Alaska and highlights common and unique challenges this approach may face. The suitability of CO2-EOR methods in the Alaskan oil pools is examined, and a ranking of the oil pools with publicly available data is provided. Keywords: CO ; carbon dioxide; enhanced oil recovery; Alaska; heavy oil; viscous oil; North Slope Citation: Dogah, B.; Atashbari, V.; 2 Ahmadi, M.; Sheets, B. -
ALASKA GAS HYDRATE PLANNING WORKSHOP PROCEEDINGS: Anchorage, Alaska August 17-18, 2005
Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION 135 ALASKA GAS HYDRATE PLANNING WORKSHOP PROCEEDINGS: Anchorage, Alaska August 17-18, 2005 by Timothy Collett (USGS), Robert F. Swenson (DGGS), and Brenda Pierce (USGS) December 2005 THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED FOR TECHNICAL CONTENT (EXCEPT AS NOTED IN TEXT) OR FOR CONFORMITY TO THE EDITORIAL STANDARDS OF DGGS. Released by STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys 3354 College Rd. Fairbanks, Alaska 99709-3707 $4.00 ALASKA GAS HYDRATE PLANNING WORKSHOP -WORKSHOP PROCEEDINGS- Anchorage, Alaska August 17-18, 2005 Sponsored by Alaska Department of Natural Resources United States Geological Survey -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ALASKA GAS HYDRATE PLANNING WORKSHOP -WORKSHOP PROCEEDINGS- --------------------- TABLE OF CONTENTS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Executive Summary 1 II. Recommendations 3 III. Introduction 5 IV. Breakout Group 1 - Geological and Engineering Data and Acquisition Evaluation 11 V. Breakout Group 2 – Gas Hydrate Reservoir Modeling and Production Testing 19 VI. Breakout Group 3 – Industry Synergies and Opportunities 28 VII. List of Attendees 36 VIII. List of Electronic Presentations 38 Note: Although every effort was made to incorporate all viewpoints put forth in the workshop, the authors acknowledge this summary document of workshop proceedings does not necessarily represent -
Kuparuk 25Th 2007
Page 2 Celebrating 25 years of production at the Kuparuk River oil field Celebrating 25 years of production at the Kuparuk River oil field Page 3 Page 4 Celebrating 25 years of production at the Kuparuk River oil field Congratulations to ConocoPhillips, BP, Chevron and ExxonMobil for 25 Years at Kuparuk Alaska Frontier Constructors, Inc. y PO Box 224889 y Anchorage AK 99522 y (907) 562-5303 Phone y (907) 562-5309 Fax Celebrating 25 years of production at the Kuparuk River oil field Page 5 A message from Jim Bowles JUDY PATRICK JUDY President, ConocoPhillips Alaska lease join me in congratulating Kuparuk went on to receive the Kuparuk on the occasion of its 25th Interstate Oil and Gas Compact P anniversary. The first production from Commission Environmental Stewardship the Kuparuk Oil Field took place on award, and become a proud member of the December 13, 1981.Though it was once Alaska Green Star program. These national thought to be a marginal field, Kuparuk and local recognitions are all symbols of the went on to surpass its 2 billion barrels pro- outstanding efforts by our employees and duced milestone and is still going strong. contractors who have made environmental Kuparuk’s history and cur- consciousness part of daily rent operations are distin- routine at Kuparuk. This guished by technology,envi- grassroots effort has grown ronmental stewardship and and evolved to include the dedicated people who ConocoPhillips’ support of work in the field. conservation and access pro- After the investment of grams supporting key fish 25 years of technology and and wildlife habitats in Agency Award for Pollution Prevention. -
A GLOBAL OUTLOOK on METHANE GAS HYDRATES VOLUME TWO Beaudoin, Y
FROZEN HEAT A GLOBAL OUTLOOK ON METHANE GAS HYDRATES VOLUME TWO Beaudoin, Y. C., Dallimore, S. R., and Boswell, R. (eds), 2014. Frozen Heat: A UNEP Global Outlook on Methane Gas Hydrates. Volume 2. United Nations Environment Programme, GRID-Arendal. © United Nations Environment Programme, 2014 ISBN: 978-92-807-3319-8 Job No: DEW/1633/NO This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. Applications for such permission, with a statement of purpose and intent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Division of Communications and Public Information (DCPI), UNEP, P.O. Box 30552, Nairobi 00100, Kenya. The use of information from this publication concerning proprietary products for publicity or advertising is not permitted. DISCLAIMERS The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP or contributory organizations and neither do they imply any endorsement. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP concerning the legal status of any country, territory or city or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. -
Alpine Satellite Development Plan Supplemental
BLM DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT for the Alpine Satellite Development Plan for the Proposed Greater Mooses Tooth One Alaska Development Project Volume 1: Chapters 1-7 Cooperating Agencies: U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alaska District • State of Alaska •North Slope Borough • Native Village of Nuiqsut The Bureau of Land Management Today Our Vision To enhance the quality of life for all citizens through the balanced stewardship of America’s public lands and resources. Our Mission To sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. BLM/AK/PL-14/002+5101+AK9300 Cover Photos: 1. Aerial of Blackfish Creek downstream from GMT1 1 Drilling pad, National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska. 2. Caribou, North Slope, Alaska 2 3 4 3. Ice road construction, National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska. 4. Aerial of production pad, North Slope, Alaska. © ConocoPhillips. Alpine Satellite Development Plan GMT1 Development Project DRAFT Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1: Chapters 1-7 Prepared by: U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Anchorage, Alaska In cooperation with: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. DOI Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. DOI Bureau of Ocean Energy Management State of Alaska Native Village of Nuiqsut North Slope Borough February 2014 Alpine Satellite Development Plan GMT1 Development Project DRAFT Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Lead Agency U.S. Department of the Interior (USDOI), Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Proposed Action: To provide ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. -
Crude Intentions: Evaluating the Growing Risks of Arctic Alaskan Oil Production
SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad SIT Digital Collections Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection SIT Study Abroad Spring 2020 Crude Intentions: Evaluating the Growing Risks of Arctic Alaskan Oil Production Eliot Stein SIT Study Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection Part of the Climate Commons, Energy Policy Commons, Environmental Health and Protection Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Oil, Gas, and Energy Commons, and the Place and Environment Commons Recommended Citation Stein, Eliot, "Crude Intentions: Evaluating the Growing Risks of Arctic Alaskan Oil Production" (2020). Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection. 3285. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/3285 This Unpublished Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the SIT Study Abroad at SIT Digital Collections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection by an authorized administrator of SIT Digital Collections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Crude Intentions: Evaluating the Growing Risks of Arctic Alaskan Oil Production Eliot Stein SIT Iceland: Climate Change and the Arctic Spring 2020 1 Acknowledgements First, I would like to thank Dan Govoni and Alex Tyas for their support both in Iceland and the United States. They ensured my abbreviated time in Iceland and Finland was incredibly worthwhile and their continued virtual guidance made this project possible. Next, I want to thank my fellow classmates for engaging in thought-provoking conversations, making my experience abroad so much fun, and remaining positive in light of a global pandemic. To my family, thank you for keeping me motivated once I returned home. -
Resource Characterization and Quantification of Natural Gas
Resource Characterization and Quantification of Natural Gas-Hydrate and Associated Free-Gas Accumulations in the Prudhoe Bay – Kuparuk River Area on the North Slope of Alaska June 2006 Quarterly Technical Report Fifteenth Technical Quarterly Report: inclusive of January 2005 – June 2006 (Technical Quarterly Reports Ten through Fourteen Waived) Cooperative Agreement Award Number DE-FC-01NT41332 Submitted to the United States Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory ADD Document Control by BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc. Robert Hunter (Principal Investigator) P.O. Box 196612 Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6612 Email: [email protected] [email protected] Tel: (907)-339-6377 with University of Alaska Fairbanks Shirish Patil (Principal Investigator) 425 Duckering Building P.O. Box 755880 Fairbanks, Alaska 99775-5880 and Arizona Board of Regents University of Arizona, Tucson Robert Casavant (Principal Investigator) Dept. Mining and Geological Engineering Rm. 245, Mines and Metallurgy Bldg. #12 1235 E. North Campus Dr., POB 210012 Tucson, AZ 85721-0012 in collaboration with United States Geological Survey Tim Collett (Principal Investigator) Denver Federal Center Box 25046, MS939 Denver, CO 80225 July 31, 2006 DE-FC-01NT41332 Quarterly Report 15 (inclusive of 10-15), June 2006 Page i DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.