30 Strong 2007

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

30 Strong 2007 Prudhoe discovery, 1967 30 Strong is a special publication from Petroleum News $1.95 2 30 Strong: Celebrating three decades of oil production from Alaska’s North Slope 30 Strong: Celebrating three decades of oil production from Alaska’s North Slope 3 4 30 Strong: Celebrating three decades of oil production from Alaska’s North Slope 30 Strong: Celebrating three decades of oil production from Alaska’s North Slope 5 CONTENTS 8 Mega-line drives industry technology 28 Reducing development footprint 30-year old trans-Alaska pipeline adopts best new Directional drilling, technical innovations technology for safe, reliable operation dramatically reduce environmental impact 14 32 Computer tech revolutionizes seismic Better data resolution, high-tech processing create collaborative approach to subsurface 30 Strong Celebrating three decades of oil production from Alaska’s North Slope Released October 2007 PETROLEUM NEWS PO Box 231647 Anchorage, AK 99523-1647 32 Phone: (907) 522-9469 Fax: (907) 522-9583 14 TAPS: Young after 30 years www.petroleumnews.com Over past 10 years Alyeska achieved 99.5% 36 Can seismic detect oil and gas? Petroleum News magazine staff pipeline mechanical reliability rate Direct hydrocarbon identification has progressed; KAY CASHMAN • Publisher & Executive Editor still possible to drill a duster 20 Seismic moves into 21st century MARY MACK • Chief Financial Officer ROSE RAGSDALE • Contract editor Technical progress enables assembly 38 Gravel use has technical challenges ALAN BAILEY • Staff writer of increasingly detailed subsurface information Oil industry, regulators join forces on slope, SUSAN CRANE • Advertising Director convert mines into fish, waterfowl habitat STEVEN MERRITT • Production Director 24 Extending the drilling envelope TOM KEARNEY • Advertising Design Evolving technologies enable extraction of more 42 The drilling waste dilemma TIM KIKTA • Copy Editor and more oil from Alaska’s North Slope Hardrock mining technology adapted for modern CLINT LASLEY • Circulation Director grind-and-inject disposal SHANE LASLEY • IT Director - À} ÃÕÀv>Vi vÌ«ÀÌ] iÝ«>`} ÃÕLÃÕÀv>Vi VÌ>VÌ Main cover photo by Judy Patrick. Other 45 With DRA pipeline less of a drag photos courtesy of Alan Bailey, Alyeska £Çä £nä £nx £*ÀiÃiÌ ÓäÊ>VÀià Pipeline Service Co. and Gill Mull £ÈÊ>VÀià £ÓÊ>VÀià >VÀià ÀÃÌi ÈÊ Chemical additive -âi Cover design by Steven Merritt £ä]äää¿ enables Alyeska xäÓ >VÀià Ó]ä£ä >VÀià £n]äÈ >VÀià ÎÓ]£Çä >VÀià Printed by Camai Printing, ­°än õ iî ­Î°£ õ iî ­Ón°Î õ iî ­xä°Î õ iî Pipeline Service Co. -ÕLÃÕÀv>Vi Anchorage, Alaska À>Li to achieve huge MILE MILES MILES MILES Ài> cost savings «ÀÛiiÌà `À} ÌiV }Þ Ì i ÀÌ -«i ÛiÀ Ì i «>ÃÌ Îä Þi>Àà >Ûi Ã}vV>ÌÞ Ài`ÕVi` Ì i ÃÕÀv>Vi vÌ«ÀÌ Ü i iÝ«>`} Ì i ÃÕLÃÕÀv>Vi `À>Li >Ài>] >Ã Ã Ü Ì iÃi ÕÃÌÀ>Ìð28 6 30 Strong: Celebrating three decades of oil production from Alaska’s North Slope 50 92 47 Seeking systems for all seasons 68 Pipeline pigs dig the dirty work After 30 years of upgrades, Alyeska brings Instruments used by Alyeska to monitor, maintain telecommunications, computer systems to peak 30-year-old infrastructure have improved 50 Better mousetraps for inland spills 72 Prevention fuels best practices hunt Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. scored big with recent SERVS, terminal benefit from Alyeska’s commitment advances in emergency preparedness to doing it right, best technology 54 A tale of two leaks 75 Corrosion battle began on Day 1 Emergency response quicker, more effective Ongoing campaign slows aging in trans-Alaska in 23 years between oil spills at Alyeska oil pipeline, yields technology dividends 58 UERD for offshore development 78 VMT gets vapor control technology Ultra extended reach drilling enables Liberty Air quality improves after Alyeska installs vapor offshore development without gravel island control system at Valdez terminal 60 Airtight seal skins 80 Engineering ingenuity pays off inspire rolligons EOR techniques developed over three decades Traditional Alaska Native succeed beyond developers’ wildest dreams knowledge yields secret of technology to California inventor 86 Meeting Northstar’s challenges Technology helps island development succeed in 63 A vanishing footprint sensitive environment with leak detection, smart wells Use of ice-based infrastructure minimizes impact of winter exploration activity 90 Exploration rigs more mobile 66 Insulated ice pads extend season 92 The quest for happy caribou Innovation minimizes environmental impact, shrinks After 30 years of study, much learned about Central exploration footprint, cuts costs Arctic herd as industry continues to accommodate 30 Strong: Celebrating three decades of oil production from Alaska’s North Slope 7 8 30 Strong: Celebrating three decades of oil production from Alaska’s North Slope JUDY PATRICK JUDY The 800-mile trans-Alaska pipeline system starts at Prudhoe Bay and terminates at the Port of Valdez. Mega-line drives industry technology 30-year old trans-Alaska pipeline adopts best new technology for safe, reliable operation By ROSE RAGSDALE ogy did not exist for pro- the North Slope has mushroomed n the 30 years since operators moved duction in such an environ- from just Prudhoe Bay,still North the first barrel of Prudhoe Bay oil down ment. Normal steel pilings America’s largest oil discovery. I the trans-Alaska pipeline in 1977, would crumble like soda Today,the slope is home to an improvements in technology have illumi- straws when driving into industrial complex that stretches nated the path forward on Alaska’s North the permafrost.” from the 1 billion-barrel Alpine Slope. More than 20 years field near the National Petroleum Beginning in the exploration years lead- later,Yergin marveled at the Reserve-Alaska in the west some 60 ing to the 1968 discovery of the giant changes wrought by the miles to the east where the Badami Prudhoe Bay field, explorers and their con- industry with the aid of field produces oil just 23 miles tractors faced unprecedented challenges in technology.“This industry from the border of the Arctic coping with the fragile tundra with its shal- … can, at $15 or $16 a bar- National Wildlife Refuge. low overburden and deep layer of per- rel, do things that it For oil companies operating in mafrost and the other effects of frigid tem- thought it couldn’t do at $30 a barrel a Alaska’s Arctic, getting from 1977 to 2007 is peratures that dipped as low as minus 70 decade ago. It’s an industry that’s being an untold story of ingenuity and technolog- degrees Fahrenheit. transformed by technology and computers. ical advancements. Operators and their “It was a place unlike any other from It’s an industry that can do much better at contractors pursued development of oil which oil had yet been recovered,”wrote lower prices. It’s an industry that’s sur- fields on the North Slope with vigor and Pulitzer Prize-winning author Daniel Yergin prised itself.” optimism. First, they pulled out the stops to in commenting on the times.“The technol- Over three decades, industry activity on ramp up crude production to a peak of 30 Strong: Celebrating three decades of oil production from Alaska’s North Slope 9 2.15 million barrels per day in the late 1980s and then to adopt and create new technologies in the aftermath of the cata- GIL MULL strophic Exxon Valdez oil spill and to cope with declining ANS production and the effects of exploration and production activ- ities on the fragile tundra. Between 1985 and 1989, for example, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. worked jointly to restore the habitat along the 10-mile-long Endicott road. Researchers transplanted native grasses and successfully re-vegetated disturbed aquatic sites. Innovation poorly documented Each new problem spawned a solution, often involving new or improved technolo- gy.Increasingly innovative, the industry developed better and better ways to con- duct economic, efficient and environmen- tally benign operations in the sensitive Drill stem test No. 5 on Feb. 18, 1968, recovered both gas and oil and clearly showed that oil could be produced from Prudhoe Bay State No. 1 Arctic. “There are just thousands of things. 1980s when he worked as general manager and they would say,‘If you don’t want to We’ve not well-documented the innova- of ARCO Alaska-operated Kuparuk, North have your job cut, you should stay close to tions up there,”longtime Alaska oil industry America’s second-largest oil field. the coil.’” executive Jim Weeks said of the history of At one point, recalled Weeks,“I was sign- New technologies were developed or technological advancements on the North ing patent applications at a rate of two a acquired and applied as the need arose in Slope. Today,Weeks is co-owner of two of month for the guys in ARCO’s coiled tubing every discipline: exploration, development Alaska’s few oil independents,Winstar LLC group. “I got a kick out of those guys.We and production. Some technologies, such as and Ultrastar LLC, but he remembers the were doing some downsizing at the time, see TAPS page 10 Pipeline Partnership Providing oil field drilling and production support has been our mission on the North Slope for over twenty years. Whether it’s building ice roads or pads, moving rigs or equipment or providing field maintenance services, Peak has been a partner in atrick Photography keeping oil safely flowing off the Slope and down the Pipeline. We’re the Photo by Judy P team you can depend on. peakalaska.com 10 30 Strong: Celebrating three decades of oil production from Alaska’s North Slope continued from page 9 and gas separating facilities A big hurdle, for example, at the Alpine would take up half the field, which was built in the late 1990s, was TAPS space they currently occu- the need to build oil and gas transmission the use of ice roads and py.Today’s fields also are pipelines across the Colville River, an eco- ice pads for exploration constructed more quickly, logically important tributary that drains wells and the Arctic 30 Strong at less cost and with less about 60 percent of the North Slope into surface disturbance.
Recommended publications
  • Enhanced Oil Recovery Using CO2 in Alaska
    geosciences Review Enhanced Oil Recovery Using CO2 in Alaska Banabas Dogah *, Vahid Atashbari , Mohabbat Ahmadi and Brent Sheets Department of Petroleum Engineering, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 1764 Tanana Loop, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA; [email protected] (V.A.); [email protected] (M.A.); [email protected] (B.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Alaska holds more than 68 billion barrels of proved oil reserves and more than 36.7 trillion cubic feet of proved natural gas reserves with some special conditions such as proximity to permafrost, making Alaskan petroleum reserves unique. The low temperature in shallow reservoirs prohibited hydrocarbons’ ideal maturation, thereby generating several heavy and viscous oil accumulations in this state. This also limits the enhanced oil recovery (EOR) options, leaving the thermal methods off the table to avoid permafrost thawing, which can cause wellbore collapse. Several solutions have been attempted for improving oil production from heavy and viscous oil in Alaska; however, they have not yielded the desired recovery, and ultimate recovery factors are still less than the global average. One solution identified as a better alternative is using CO2 as an injecting fluid, alternated by water or mixed with other injectants. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of all studies on using CO2 for enhanced oil recovery purposes in Alaska and highlights common and unique challenges this approach may face. The suitability of CO2-EOR methods in the Alaskan oil pools is examined, and a ranking of the oil pools with publicly available data is provided. Keywords: CO ; carbon dioxide; enhanced oil recovery; Alaska; heavy oil; viscous oil; North Slope Citation: Dogah, B.; Atashbari, V.; 2 Ahmadi, M.; Sheets, B.
    [Show full text]
  • ALASKA GAS HYDRATE PLANNING WORKSHOP PROCEEDINGS: Anchorage, Alaska August 17-18, 2005
    Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION 135 ALASKA GAS HYDRATE PLANNING WORKSHOP PROCEEDINGS: Anchorage, Alaska August 17-18, 2005 by Timothy Collett (USGS), Robert F. Swenson (DGGS), and Brenda Pierce (USGS) December 2005 THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED FOR TECHNICAL CONTENT (EXCEPT AS NOTED IN TEXT) OR FOR CONFORMITY TO THE EDITORIAL STANDARDS OF DGGS. Released by STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Division of Geological & Geophysical Surveys 3354 College Rd. Fairbanks, Alaska 99709-3707 $4.00 ALASKA GAS HYDRATE PLANNING WORKSHOP -WORKSHOP PROCEEDINGS- Anchorage, Alaska August 17-18, 2005 Sponsored by Alaska Department of Natural Resources United States Geological Survey -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ALASKA GAS HYDRATE PLANNING WORKSHOP -WORKSHOP PROCEEDINGS- --------------------- TABLE OF CONTENTS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. Executive Summary 1 II. Recommendations 3 III. Introduction 5 IV. Breakout Group 1 - Geological and Engineering Data and Acquisition Evaluation 11 V. Breakout Group 2 – Gas Hydrate Reservoir Modeling and Production Testing 19 VI. Breakout Group 3 – Industry Synergies and Opportunities 28 VII. List of Attendees 36 VIII. List of Electronic Presentations 38 Note: Although every effort was made to incorporate all viewpoints put forth in the workshop, the authors acknowledge this summary document of workshop proceedings does not necessarily represent
    [Show full text]
  • Kuparuk 25Th 2007
    Page 2 Celebrating 25 years of production at the Kuparuk River oil field Celebrating 25 years of production at the Kuparuk River oil field Page 3 Page 4 Celebrating 25 years of production at the Kuparuk River oil field Congratulations to ConocoPhillips, BP, Chevron and ExxonMobil for 25 Years at Kuparuk Alaska Frontier Constructors, Inc. y PO Box 224889 y Anchorage AK 99522 y (907) 562-5303 Phone y (907) 562-5309 Fax Celebrating 25 years of production at the Kuparuk River oil field Page 5 A message from Jim Bowles JUDY PATRICK JUDY President, ConocoPhillips Alaska lease join me in congratulating Kuparuk went on to receive the Kuparuk on the occasion of its 25th Interstate Oil and Gas Compact P anniversary. The first production from Commission Environmental Stewardship the Kuparuk Oil Field took place on award, and become a proud member of the December 13, 1981.Though it was once Alaska Green Star program. These national thought to be a marginal field, Kuparuk and local recognitions are all symbols of the went on to surpass its 2 billion barrels pro- outstanding efforts by our employees and duced milestone and is still going strong. contractors who have made environmental Kuparuk’s history and cur- consciousness part of daily rent operations are distin- routine at Kuparuk. This guished by technology,envi- grassroots effort has grown ronmental stewardship and and evolved to include the dedicated people who ConocoPhillips’ support of work in the field. conservation and access pro- After the investment of grams supporting key fish 25 years of technology and and wildlife habitats in Agency Award for Pollution Prevention.
    [Show full text]
  • A GLOBAL OUTLOOK on METHANE GAS HYDRATES VOLUME TWO Beaudoin, Y
    FROZEN HEAT A GLOBAL OUTLOOK ON METHANE GAS HYDRATES VOLUME TWO Beaudoin, Y. C., Dallimore, S. R., and Boswell, R. (eds), 2014. Frozen Heat: A UNEP Global Outlook on Methane Gas Hydrates. Volume 2. United Nations Environment Programme, GRID-Arendal. © United Nations Environment Programme, 2014 ISBN: 978-92-807-3319-8 Job No: DEW/1633/NO This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. Applications for such permission, with a statement of purpose and intent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Division of Communications and Public Information (DCPI), UNEP, P.O. Box 30552, Nairobi 00100, Kenya. The use of information from this publication concerning proprietary products for publicity or advertising is not permitted. DISCLAIMERS The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNEP or contributory organizations and neither do they imply any endorsement. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP concerning the legal status of any country, territory or city or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpine Satellite Development Plan Supplemental
    BLM DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT for the Alpine Satellite Development Plan for the Proposed Greater Mooses Tooth One Alaska Development Project Volume 1: Chapters 1-7 Cooperating Agencies: U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alaska District • State of Alaska •North Slope Borough • Native Village of Nuiqsut The Bureau of Land Management Today Our Vision To enhance the quality of life for all citizens through the balanced stewardship of America’s public lands and resources. Our Mission To sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. BLM/AK/PL-14/002+5101+AK9300 Cover Photos: 1. Aerial of Blackfish Creek downstream from GMT1 1 Drilling pad, National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska. 2. Caribou, North Slope, Alaska 2 3 4 3. Ice road construction, National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska. 4. Aerial of production pad, North Slope, Alaska. © ConocoPhillips. Alpine Satellite Development Plan GMT1 Development Project DRAFT Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1: Chapters 1-7 Prepared by: U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Anchorage, Alaska In cooperation with: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. DOI Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. DOI Bureau of Ocean Energy Management State of Alaska Native Village of Nuiqsut North Slope Borough February 2014 Alpine Satellite Development Plan GMT1 Development Project DRAFT Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Lead Agency U.S. Department of the Interior (USDOI), Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Proposed Action: To provide ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Crude Intentions: Evaluating the Growing Risks of Arctic Alaskan Oil Production
    SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad SIT Digital Collections Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection SIT Study Abroad Spring 2020 Crude Intentions: Evaluating the Growing Risks of Arctic Alaskan Oil Production Eliot Stein SIT Study Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection Part of the Climate Commons, Energy Policy Commons, Environmental Health and Protection Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Oil, Gas, and Energy Commons, and the Place and Environment Commons Recommended Citation Stein, Eliot, "Crude Intentions: Evaluating the Growing Risks of Arctic Alaskan Oil Production" (2020). Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection. 3285. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/3285 This Unpublished Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the SIT Study Abroad at SIT Digital Collections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection by an authorized administrator of SIT Digital Collections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Crude Intentions: Evaluating the Growing Risks of Arctic Alaskan Oil Production Eliot Stein SIT Iceland: Climate Change and the Arctic Spring 2020 1 Acknowledgements First, I would like to thank Dan Govoni and Alex Tyas for their support both in Iceland and the United States. They ensured my abbreviated time in Iceland and Finland was incredibly worthwhile and their continued virtual guidance made this project possible. Next, I want to thank my fellow classmates for engaging in thought-provoking conversations, making my experience abroad so much fun, and remaining positive in light of a global pandemic. To my family, thank you for keeping me motivated once I returned home.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Characterization and Quantification of Natural Gas
    Resource Characterization and Quantification of Natural Gas-Hydrate and Associated Free-Gas Accumulations in the Prudhoe Bay – Kuparuk River Area on the North Slope of Alaska June 2006 Quarterly Technical Report Fifteenth Technical Quarterly Report: inclusive of January 2005 – June 2006 (Technical Quarterly Reports Ten through Fourteen Waived) Cooperative Agreement Award Number DE-FC-01NT41332 Submitted to the United States Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory ADD Document Control by BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc. Robert Hunter (Principal Investigator) P.O. Box 196612 Anchorage, Alaska 99519-6612 Email: [email protected] [email protected] Tel: (907)-339-6377 with University of Alaska Fairbanks Shirish Patil (Principal Investigator) 425 Duckering Building P.O. Box 755880 Fairbanks, Alaska 99775-5880 and Arizona Board of Regents University of Arizona, Tucson Robert Casavant (Principal Investigator) Dept. Mining and Geological Engineering Rm. 245, Mines and Metallurgy Bldg. #12 1235 E. North Campus Dr., POB 210012 Tucson, AZ 85721-0012 in collaboration with United States Geological Survey Tim Collett (Principal Investigator) Denver Federal Center Box 25046, MS939 Denver, CO 80225 July 31, 2006 DE-FC-01NT41332 Quarterly Report 15 (inclusive of 10-15), June 2006 Page i DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
    [Show full text]