DOCSLIB.ORG

Alpine Satellite Development Plan Supplemental

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alpine Satellite Development Plan Supplemental BLM DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT for the Alpine Satellite Development Plan for the Proposed Greater Mooses Tooth One Alaska Development Project Volume 1: Chapters 1-7 Cooperating Agencies: U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alaska District • State of Alaska •North Slope Borough • Native Village of Nuiqsut The Bureau of Land Management Today Our Vision To enhance the quality of life for all citizens through the balanced stewardship of America’s public lands and resources. Our Mission To sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. BLM/AK/PL-14/002+5101+AK9300 Cover Photos: 1. Aerial of Blackfish Creek downstream from GMT1 1 Drilling pad, National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska. 2. Caribou, North Slope, Alaska 2 3 4 3. Ice road construction, National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska. 4. Aerial of production pad, North Slope, Alaska. © ConocoPhillips. Alpine Satellite Development Plan GMT1 Development Project DRAFT Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1: Chapters 1-7 Prepared by: U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Anchorage, Alaska In cooperation with: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. DOI Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. DOI Bureau of Ocean Energy Management State of Alaska Native Village of Nuiqsut North Slope Borough February 2014 Alpine Satellite Development Plan GMT1 Development Project DRAFT Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement Lead Agency U.S. Department of the Interior (USDOI), Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Proposed Action: To provide ConocoPhillips Alaska, Inc. (CPAI) with legal access across public land managed by the BLM, and authorizations to construct, operate, and maintain a drill site, pipelines, an access road, and ancillary facilities to develop and produce petroleum resources on BLM- managed lands within the Greater Mooses Tooth Unit (GMTU) of the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska (NPR-A). Abstract: CPAI is proposing to produce hydrocarbon resources from a surface location on federal oil and gas lease AA-081798 in the NPR-A. The proposed GMT1 project includes a drill site in the GMTU, a pipeline and road corridor to CPAI facilities at Colville Delta 5 (CD5), an ancillary water pipeline between CD1 and CD4, and a new gravel source. CD1, CD2, CD3 and CD4 are existing facilities. CD5 is currently authorized and expected to be in operation by late 2015. Development of the GMT1 project is dependent upon construction of CD5. This Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (SEIS) is being prepared to evaluate relevant new circumstances and information which have arisen since the Alpine Satellite Development Plan (ASDP) Final EIS was issued in September 2004, to provide opportunities for public participation, as well as to address changes to CPAI’s proposed development plan for GMT1 (referred to as CD6 in the ASDP EIS). GMT1 is part of the ASDP, for which a Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was prepared by the BLM, with a Record of Decision (ROD) approving issuance of the BLM authorizations needed for development of the Alpine Field. The currently proposed GMT1 Development Project is very similar to the CD6 development approved for permitting in the 2004 ASDP ROD, with changes which reduce the overall impact. These changes include moving the drill site location out of the Fish Creek setback; reducing the road and pipeline length, thereby reducing amount of fill required and impacts to wetlands; and increasing the length of the Tiŋmiaqsiġvik (Ublutuoch) River bridge. The BLM has lead responsibility for preparation of this Draft SEIS. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. DOI Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. DOI Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, State of Alaska, Native Village of Nuiqsut, and the North Slope Borough are participating in the analysis as Cooperating Agencies. The Draft SEIS documents the potential effects to: Physiography, Geology, Soils and Permafrost, Sand and Gravel, Paleontological Resources, Water Resources, Surface Water Quality, Climate and Meteorology, Air Quality, Noise, Terrestrial Vegetation and Wetlands, Fish, Birds, Terrestrial Mammals, Marine Mammals, Threatened and Endangered Species, Socio-cultural Environment, State and Local Economy, Subsistence Harvest and Uses, Environmental Justice, Cultural Resources, Land Use, Recreation, Visual Resources, and Transportation. The potential effects of spilled crude oil produced fluids, seawater, and other chemicals have also been evaluated. This Draft SEIS provides documentation of the analysis of the proposed action and alternatives, based upon issues and concerns identified through the scoping process and meetings of the cooperating agencies. Further Contact Bridget Psarianos of the Bureau of Land Management, at (907- Information: 271-4208) or visit the SEIS website at www.blm.gov/ak. Comments Comments on issues related to the GMT1 Draft SEIS may be submitted by: Email: [email protected] Fax: 907–271–3933 Mail: GMT1 Draft SEIS Comments 222 West 7th Avenue, Stop #13 Anchorage, AK 99513. Contents of Volume 1 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Location and Land Status ................................................................................. 1 1.2 History of Operations in the Area ................................................................................. 2 1.3 Purpose and Need for the Project .................................................................................. 3 1.4 Purpose and Need for Federal Action ............................................................................ 4 1.4.1 Support for Federal Decisions .................................................................................. 5 1.4.2 Laws, Regulations, and Permits .............................................................................. 5 1.4.3 Related NEPA Analyses ......................................................................................... 11 1.4.4 Scope of SEIS ......................................................................................................... 13 1.4.5 Changes and New Information .............................................................................. 13 1.5 Public Involvement ...................................................................................................... 16 1.5.1 Scoping ................................................................................................................... 16 1.5.2 Other Stakeholder opportunities ........................................................................... 17 CHAPTER 2: PROPOSED PROJECT AND ALTERNATIVES ................................ 19 2.1 Project as Proposed in 2004 ASDP Record of Decision ............................................... 19 2.2 Summary of Proposed Project Changes from 2004 ..................................................... 20 2.3 Alternatives to the Proposed Project ........................................................................... 20 2.3.1 Alternatives Selection Process ............................................................................... 21 2.3.2 Alternatives Considered But Not Carried Forward .............................................. 22 2.3.3 Alternatives Carried Forward in the SEIS............................................................ 22 2.4 Alternative A: CPAI Proposed Project ......................................................................... 23 2.4.1 Location .................................................................................................................. 24 2.4.2 Drill Site Design and Facilities .............................................................................. 24 2.4.3 Pipelines ................................................................................................................. 25 2.4.4 Gravel Road ............................................................................................................ 27 2.4.5 Bridges and Culverts ............................................................................................. 27 2.4.6 Gravel supply options ............................................................................................ 28 2.4.7 Construction Activities........................................................................................... 30 2.4.8 Drilling and Operations ......................................................................................... 39 2.5 Alternative B ................................................................................................................ 42 2.6 Alternative C ................................................................................................................ 43 2.7 Alternative D ................................................................................................................ 45 2.8 Alternative E ................................................................................................................ 49 CHAPTER 3: AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ............................................................ 51 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 51 3.1.1 Project Study Area ................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Roy Staab Four Seasons / Four Corners
    ROY STAAB FOUR SEASONS / CORNERS ROY STAAB FOUR SEASONS / CORNERS Institute of Visual Arts University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee July 10-September 27, 2009 with contributions by Suzaan Boettger Nicholas Frank John K. Grande Amy Lipton Institute of Visual Arts University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee July 10-September 27, 2009 Inova is grateful for the support of the Greater Milwaukee Foundation’s Mary L. Nohl Fund. Published by the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Peck School of the Arts on the occasion of the exhibition ROY STAAB: FOUR SEASONS/FOUR CORNERS Organized by the Institute of Visual Arts (Inova) P.O. Box 413 Milwaukee, WI 53201 Phone: (414) 229-4762 Fax: (414) 229-6154 arts.uwm.edu © 2009 by the Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System. All rights reserved. No part of the contents of this book may be produced without the written permission of the publisher. ISBN: 9780981930114 Printed in the United States of America All photographs of installations by Roy Staab except: Michel Goday, figs. 2, 9 Gregg Schmidts, fig. 17 Leonard Freed, fig. 23 Nicholas Frank, fig. 33 Alan Magayne-Roshak, fig. 34 Additional credits: cover: Pyramid Space 7 - August 24, 1988 fig. 16: Digital Image © The Museum of Modern Art/Licensed by SCALA/Art Resource, NY fig. 18: Collection of the Gemeente Museum Den Haag. 1 (opposite) Fluke, 2008, Marbaek Beach near Esbjerg, Denmark 2 Port-Vendres, France, 1979 5 X MARKS THE STAAB Anyone who knows Roy Staab has experienced the discrepancy between 3 Dennis Oppenheim his personality and his artwork. His temporary environmental site installations Cancelled Crop, 1969 are the embodiment of calm, humility and silence.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Annual Wildlife and Botanical Report and 2013 Work Plan
    20130423-5130 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 4/23/2013 2:31:26 PM Via Electronic Filing April 23, 2013 Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 1st Street N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426 Subject: Wells Hydroelectric Project – FERC Project No. 2149 2012 Annual Wildlife and Botanical Report and 2013 Work Plan Dear Secretary Bose: Public Utility District No. 1 of Douglas County, Washington (Douglas PUD), licensee for the Wells Hydroelectric Project No. 2149 (Wells Project) respectfully submits the enclosed annual report titled: 2012 Wildlife and Botanical Report and 2013 Work Plan. This report describes the implementation of activities conducted during calendar year 2012 in compliance with Article 409 of the license for the Wells Project, and the terms of the Wildlife and Botanical Management Plan (WBMP), Avian Protection Plan (APP) and Off-License Settlement Agreement. The enclosed report also includes a description of the measures to be implemented during calendar year 2013 in association with these same resource protection plans and agreement. Article 409 of the new license for the Wells Project requires Douglas PUD to implement the WBMP filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) on May 27, 2010 as Appendix E-3 of Exhibit E of the Final License Application. Article 409 also requires the development of an annual report that documents the results of the prior year’s measures and describes the upcoming year’s proposed measures pursuant to the WBMP. Article 409 further requires Douglas PUD to annually update the list of sensitive plant species found in the WBMP based upon an annual review of the Washington Natural Heritage Program rare plant list, and it requires Douglas PUD to develop the WBMP annual report and work plan in consultation with specific federal and state agencies and the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation.1 Douglas PUD is required to submit the annual report and work plan to the FERC by May 31st of each year following license issuance.
    [Show full text]
  • “A People Who Have Not the Pride to Record Their History Will Not Long
    STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE i “A people who have not the pride to record their History will not long have virtues to make History worth recording; and Introduction no people who At the rear of Old Main at Bethany College, the sun shines through are indifferent an arcade. This passageway is filled with students today, just as it was more than a hundred years ago, as shown in a c.1885 photograph. to their past During my several visits to this college, I have lingered here enjoying the light and the student activity. It reminds me that we are part of the past need hope to as well as today. People can connect to historic resources through their make their character and setting as well as the stories they tell and the memories they make. future great.” The National Register of Historic Places recognizes historic re- sources such as Old Main. In 2000, the State Historic Preservation Office Virgil A. Lewis, first published Historic West Virginia which provided brief descriptions noted historian of our state’s National Register listings. This second edition adds approx- Mason County, imately 265 new listings, including the Huntington home of Civil Rights West Virginia activist Memphis Tennessee Garrison, the New River Gorge Bridge, Camp Caesar in Webster County, Fort Mill Ridge in Hampshire County, the Ananias Pitsenbarger Farm in Pendleton County and the Nuttallburg Coal Mining Complex in Fayette County. Each reveals the richness of our past and celebrates the stories and accomplishments of our citizens. I hope you enjoy and learn from Historic West Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Brett R. Lenz
    COLONIZER GEOARCHAEOLOGY OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION A Dissertation DR. BRETT R. LENZ COLONIZER GEOARCHAEOLOGY OF THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION, NORTH AMERICA Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Leicester By Brett Reinhold Lenz Department of Archaeology and Ancient History University of Leicester June 2011 1 DEDICATION This work is dedicated to Garreck, Haydn and Carver. And to Hank, for teaching me how rivers form. 2 Abstract This dissertation involves the development of a geologic framework applied to upper Pleistocene and earliest Holocene archaeological site discovery. It is argued that efforts to identify colonizer archaeological sites require knowledge of geologic processes, Quaternary stratigraphic detail and an understanding of basic soil science principles. An overview of Quaternary geologic deposits based on previous work in the region is presented. This is augmented by original research which presents a new, proposed regional pedostratigraphic framework, a new source of lithic raw material, the Beezley chalcedony, and details of a new cache of lithic tools with Paleoindian affinities made from this previously undescribed stone source. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The list of people who deserve my thanks and appreciation is large. First, to my parents and family, I give the greatest thanks for providing encouragement and support across many years. Without your steady support it would not be possible. Thanks Mom and Dad, Steph, Jen and Mellissa. To Dani and my sons, I appreciate your patience and support and for your love and encouragement that is always there. Due to a variety of factors, but mostly my own foibles, the research leading to this dissertation has taken place over a protracted period of time, and as a result, different stages of my personal development are likely reflected in it.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Strategy for Multi-Species at Risk in Vernal Pools and Other Ephemeral Wet Areas Associated with Garry Oak Ecosystems in Canada
    Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series Recovery Strategy for Multi-Species at Risk in Vernal Pools and other Ephemeral Wet Areas Associated with Garry Oak Ecosystems in Canada Bog birds-foot trefoil Tall woolly-heads (Pacific population) Water plantain buttercup Kellogg’s rush Rosy owl clover Dwarf sandwort July 2006 About the Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series What is the Species at Risk Act (SARA)? SARA is the Act developed by the federal government as a key contribution to the common national effort to protect and conserve species at risk in Canada. SARA came into force in 2003 and one of its purposes is “to provide for the recovery of wildlife species that are extirpated, endangered or threatened as a result of human activity.” What is recovery? In the context of species at risk conservation, recovery is the process by which the decline of an endangered, threatened or extirpated species is arrested or reversed, and threats are removed or reduced to improve the likelihood of the species’ persistence in the wild. A species will be considered recovered when its long-term persistence in the wild has been secured. What is a recovery strategy? A recovery strategy is a planning document that identifies what needs to be done to arrest or reverse the decline of a species. It sets goals and objectives and identifies the main areas of activities to be undertaken. Detailed planning is done at the action plan stage. Recovery strategy development is a commitment of all provinces and territories and of three federal agencies — Environment Canada, Parks Canada Agency and Fisheries and Oceans Canada — under the Accord for the Protection of Species at Risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Together to Preserve the Past
    CUOURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT information for Parks, Federal Agencies, Trtoian Tribes, States, Local Governments, and %he Privale Sector <yt CRM TotLUME 18 NO. 7 1995 Working Together to Preserve the Past U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR National Park Service Cultural Resources PUBLISHED BY THE VOLUME 18 NO. 7 1995 NATIONAL PARK SERVICE Contents ISSN 1068-4999 To promote and maintain high standards for preserving and managing cultural resources Working Together DIRECTOR to Preserve the Past Roger G. Kennedy ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR Katherine H. Stevenson The Historic Contact in the Northeast EDITOR National Historic Landmark Theme Study Ronald M. Greenberg An Overview 3 PRODUCTION MANAGER Robert S. Grumet Karlota M. Koester A National Perspective 4 GUEST EDITOR Carol D. Shull Robert S. Grumet ADVISORS The Most Important Things We Can Do 5 David Andrews Lloyd N. Chapman Editor, NPS Joan Bacharach Museum Registrar, NPS The NHL Archeological Initiative 7 Randall J. Biallas Veletta Canouts Historical Architect, NPS John A. Bums Architect, NPS Harry A. Butowsky Shantok: A Tale of Two Sites 8 Historian, NPS Melissa Jayne Fawcett Pratt Cassity Executive Director, National Alliance of Preservation Commissions Pemaquid National Historic Landmark 11 Muriel Crespi Cultural Anthropologist, NPS Robert L. Bradley Craig W. Davis Archeologist, NPS Mark R. Edwards The Fort Orange and Schuyler Flatts NHL 15 Director, Historic Preservation Division, Paul R. Huey State Historic Preservation Officer, Georgia Bruce W Fry Chief of Research Publications National Historic Sites, Parks Canada The Rescue of Fort Massapeag 20 John Hnedak Ralph S. Solecki Architectural Historian, NPS Roger E. Kelly Archeologist, NPS Historic Contact at Camden NHL 25 Antoinette J.
    [Show full text]
  • Archeology Inventory Table of Contents
    National Historic Landmarks--Archaeology Inventory Theresa E. Solury, 1999 Updated and Revised, 2003 Caridad de la Vega National Historic Landmarks-Archeology Inventory Table of Contents Review Methods and Processes Property Name ..........................................................1 Cultural Affiliation .......................................................1 Time Period .......................................................... 1-2 Property Type ...........................................................2 Significance .......................................................... 2-3 Theme ................................................................3 Restricted Address .......................................................3 Format Explanation .................................................... 3-4 Key to the Data Table ........................................................ 4-6 Data Set Alabama ...............................................................7 Alaska .............................................................. 7-9 Arizona ............................................................. 9-10 Arkansas ..............................................................10 California .............................................................11 Colorado ..............................................................11 Connecticut ........................................................ 11-12 District of Columbia ....................................................12 Florida ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bone Flutes and Whistles from Archaeological Sites in Eastern North America
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-1976 Bone Flutes and Whistles from Archaeological Sites in Eastern North America Katherine Lee Hall Martin University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Martin, Katherine Lee Hall, "Bone Flutes and Whistles from Archaeological Sites in Eastern North America. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1976. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/1226 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Katherine Lee Hall Martin entitled "Bone Flutes and Whistles from Archaeological Sites in Eastern North America." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Charles H. Faulkner, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Major C. R. McCollough, Paul W . Parmalee Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Katherine Lee Hall Mar tin entitled "Bone Flutes and Wh istles from Archaeological Sites in Eastern North America." I recormnend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a maj or in Anthropology.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Wildlife and Botanical Annual Report
    20190523-5023 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 5/22/2019 6:42:20 PM Via Electronic Filing May 22, 2019 Honorable Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 1st Street N.E. Washington, D.C. 20426 Subject: Wells Hydroelectric Project – FERC Project No. 2149 2018 Annual Wildlife and Botanical Report and 2019 Work Plan Dear Secretary Bose: Public Utility District No. 1 of Douglas County, Washington (Douglas PUD), licensee for the Wells Hydroelectric Project No. 2149 (Wells Project) respectfully submits the enclosed annual report titled: 2018 Annual Wildlife and Botanical Report and 2019 Work Plan. This report describes the implementation of activities conducted during calendar year 2018 in compliance with Article 409 of the license for the Wells Project, and the terms of the Wildlife and Botanical Management Plan (WBMP), Avian Protection Plan (APP) and Off-License Settlement Agreement. The enclosed report also includes a description of the measures to be implemented during calendar year 2019 in association with the same resource protection plans and agreements. Article 409 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) license for the Wells Project requires Douglas PUD to implement the WBMP filed with the FERC on May 27, 2010 as Appendix E-3 of Exhibit E of the Final License Application. Article 409 also requires the development of an annual report that documents the results of the prior year’s measures and describes the upcoming year’s proposed measures pursuant to the WBMP. Article 409 further requires Douglas PUD to annually update the list of sensitive plant species found in the WBMP based upon an annual review of the Washington Natural Heritage Program rare plant list, and it requires Douglas PUD to develop the WBMP annual repor t and work plan in consultation with specific federal and state agencies and the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation.1 Douglas PUD is required to submit the annual report and work plan to the FERC by May 31st of each year following license issuance.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the Proposal
    4.13: Archaeological and historical 4.13.1: Existing conditions Archaic – 10,500-4,400 BC consisting of highly Archaeological and historical resources may be mobile small groups subsisting on marine, categorized into 3 major types: shoreline, and terrestrial resources with stone, bone, antler, and perishable technological Archaeological - resources that represent materials illustrated by Olcott points. important evidence of past human behavior, including portable artifacts such as arrowheads Early Pacific – 4,400-1,800 BC consisting of or tin cans; non-portable features such as increased sedentism in seasonal villages cooking hearths, foundations, and privies; or subsisting on shoreline resources, expanded residues such as food remains and charcoal. marine resources harvesting camas and Archaeological remains can be virtually any age, shellfish with an increase in ground stone, bone, from yesterday's trash to prehistoric deposits antler, and perishable technological materials thousands of years old. illustrated by Cascade points. Ethnographic - sites, areas, and materials Middle Pacific – 1,800 BC - 500 AD consisting of important to Native Americans for religious, winter villages of plank houses and seasonal spiritual, or traditional uses that can encompass camps subsisting on marine and riverine the sacred character of physical locations (e.g., resources with food storage technologies with a mountain peaks, springs, and burial sites) or decrease in stone tools, diversification of tools particular native plants, animals, or minerals of bone, antler, perishable technological that are gathered for use in traditional ritual materials and canoes. activities. Also included are villages, burials, rock art, rock features, and traditional hunting, Late Pacific – 500 – 1775 AD consisting of large gathering, and fishing sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resources Management Plan Context
    Exhibit E: Cultural Resources Management Plan Context Redmond’s Cultural Resources Management Plan Context Prepared for the City of Redmond Prepared by DOWL, May 2018 Refinements by the City of Redmond, June 2019 Advisement and Contributions by Steven Mullen-Moses, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, Snoqualmie Tribe Kerry Lyste, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians Laura Murphy, Archaeologist, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Richard Young, Cultural Resources Manager, Tulalip Tribes Table of Contents 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Cultural Resources: An Overview .................................................................................................................. 2 2. Regulatory Context ........................................................................................................................................................ 4 3. Cultural Resources in Redmond .............................................................................................................................. 6 3.1 Setting and Environment .................................................................................................................................. 6 3.1.1 Geology and Climate ................................................................................................................................... 6 3.1.2 Fauna ................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Indians in the Kanawha-New River Valley, 1500-1755 Isaac J
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2015 Maopewa iati bi: Takai Tonqyayun Monyton "To abandon so beautiful a Dwelling": Indians in the Kanawha-New River Valley, 1500-1755 Isaac J. Emrick Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Recommended Citation Emrick, Isaac J., "Maopewa iati bi: Takai Tonqyayun Monyton "To abandon so beautiful a Dwelling": Indians in the Kanawha-New River Valley, 1500-1755" (2015). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 5543. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/5543 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by The Research Repository @ WVU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maopewa iati bi: Takai Toñqyayuñ Monyton “To abandon so beautiful a Dwelling”: Indians in the Kanawha-New River Valley, 1500-1755 Isaac J. Emrick Dissertation submitted to the Eberly College of Arts and Sciences at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Tyler Boulware, Ph.D., Chair Kenneth Fones-Wolf, Ph.D. Joseph Hodge, Ph.D. Michele Stephens, Ph.D. Department of History & Amy Hirshman, Ph.D. Department of Sociology and Anthropology Morgantown, West Virginia 2015 Keywords: Native Americans, Indian History, West Virginia History, Colonial North America, Diaspora, Environmental History, Archaeology Copyright 2015 Isaac J. Emrick ABSTRACT Maopewa iati bi: Takai Toñqyayuñ Monyton “To abandon so beautiful a Dwelling”: Indians in the Kanawha-New River Valley, 1500-1755 Isaac J.
    [Show full text]