DOCSLIB.ORG

Download an Application Form from Our Website

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download an Application Form from Our Website CUTCUT BOTHBOTH WAYSWAYS Lichfield & Hatherton Canals Restoration Trust LHCRT director Peter Buck, kitted out as a Victorian engineer, and his wife Jeanne, in traditional boatwomen’s dress, with Rose Willow, a floral recreation of a 70ft narrowboat, waiting for the judges to arrive (26th July 2018) Issue No. 97 Autumn 2018 ay Wha eeth rf L tr Lichfield td S Heart of the Coventry Canal . TEL:01543 414808 MOBILE:0782 4848444 FAX:01543 414770 www.streethaywharf.co.uk 7-DAY CALL OUT SERVICE GEN SETS FITTED DIESEL AND SOLID FUEL STOVES FITTED BOTTOM BLACKING REPAINTING AND SIGNWRITING NEW BOATS FULL & PART FIT-OUT SUPPLIED ALL MECHANICAL / ELECTRICAL WORK FULL CHANDLERY STRETCHING AND REBOTTOMING GAS SAFE. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE ALL STEEL WORK AND TANKS Support the boat yard on the “Lichfield Ring” Boat Transport, England, Europe Cranage Arranged Site Surveys Complete Service for DIY Repairs Boat Hire Boat Fitting Diesel Pump Out Mooring Boat Sales Laundry Trent & Mersey Canal V.A.T No. 133609427 Chairman’s Column What a summer! The heat wave continued, but our intrepid volunteers continued to change the landscape at Fosseway, and how! It is now clear where the restored ay Wha canal will be and where the three walking, jogging and cycling routes will be and eth rf Hugh’s Huge Hill, aka Millington’s Mound is nearing completion. All these stupendous re L achievements have been aided by visiting volunteers from companies, IWA’s t td Waterway Recovery Group, National Citizen Service, our D of E volunteers and S Scout Groups. Maybe we should have a competition “Guess how many sandbags . in Millington’s Mound”! We are delighted to welcome back, now for a third year, our valuable Queen’s Croft High School youngsters and to welcome a second Scout Group (7th Lichfield) to holding occasional sessions with us, as Foresters Scouts have done for a several years. The Trust’s contribution to Lichfield’s entry into Heart of England in Bloom has contributed greatly to the recent news of a second Gold Award, and has also considerably raised our profile with the very visible mock-up narrow boat on Tamworth Road. We now have the worry of what we can do next year to maintain the standard set by the boat and Gallows Wharf Garden of Reflection! All that profile raising is vitally important, and our superb website and social media significantly contribute to it. But fund raising is an ever present pressure, especially as Spring 2019 and “See It Through” target date for that £1m is fast approaching. Our regular Marketing and Events people have been out at Canwell Show and a Craft Fair at Grasmere Garden Centre and there have been various walks and our own events as reported elsewhere in this edition. In addition to the PR value of these events they facilitate sales of our promotional material, bric a brac and raffle tickets (especially when Chris Aston’s got them!). Coinciding with our BBQ at Gallows Wharf was the Lichfield 10K: huge thanks to the guys who ran for us and raised over £1000. Behind the scenes work by Officers and Directors keeps us all scratching our heads and occasionally despairing of the bureaucratic obstacles we have to deal with ....... but the Trust has come so far in its 30 years that optimism returns, we grit our teeth and plough on. In so doing we are reassured by the overwhelming praise we receive for our work to create wonderful green spaces for residents, visitors and wildlife. Chris Bull, (Chairperson) Our Vision To reinstate the historic Lichfield Canal and Hatherton Canal for the benefit of the community. The natural wildlife corridor from Huddlesford to Hatherton will provide a valuable amenity for walkers, cyclists, boaters and visitors to use and will bring prosperity to the area. This project will also provide an opportunity for young people to learn about our history, our heritage and our environment. Autumn 2018 Page 3 Donations to the Trust Donations to the Trust: 1st July to 30th September 2018 Donations during this period from individuals and groups, plus ancillary items, totalled £36,580 including those to the Tunnel Vision Appeal plus Gift Aid tax claims for UK taxpayers who completed the required formalities. Other assistance • Amey (by SCC Highways) visiting volunteer team work at Fosseway Heath. • Jaguar Land Rover, multiple visiting volunteer teams at Fosseway Heath. • Lang Murphy visiting volunteer teams at Fosseway Heath. • National Citizens Service youth volunteer teams. • Queens’ Croft School, Lichfield, regular volunteer teams. • TSB, Lichfield Branch, staff fund-raising activities. • Waterway Recovery Group, summer camp volunteer team. • Norton Canes Boatbuilders for the repair of our digger bucket. All such donations, however large or small, are most gratefully received by the Trust to help us with our restoration work. We recognise that all our supporters give what they are able, reflecting the value they put on our work for the community. Because of this, and the wish of some to remain anonymous, we no longer publish names of individual donors and amounts. Our sincere thanks to all. ANNOUNCEMENT We regret to announce the loss of the following members:- Mr W. H. Cole, Sutton Coldfield, died 20th July 2018, aged c.90. “Bill Cole” was one of the earliest members of the Trust, frequently joining work parties over many years and still kept up his boating into old age. Mr Brian W Davis, Great Barr, Birmingham, died 6th August 2018, aged 83 As a professional bricklayer and able draughtsman, Brian added a new dimension in managing reconstruction of the Lichfield Canal around Lock 25 by Tamworth Road between 2005 – 2010. Mr K A Richmond, Lichfield, died September 2018. Mr A H Cross, Coventry, died September 2018. Autumn 2018 Page 4 Membership Matters Thanks Once again we would like to thank all those members who add an extra donation to their membership fee when they renew. We regard this as a better solution than increasing membership fees, which would take no account of individual members’ ability to pay and furthermore would involve around 600 members being asked to change their bank standing orders. Thank you again for your generosity. In short – we need you. Please stay with the Trust and please pay when you receive your reminder. Unfortunately our Membership Secretary has resigned for personal reasons, so if there is any member who would like to volunteer to take up the post please contact Christine Bull (details on page 30). In the short term all membership matters should be referred to Bob Williams (details on page 30). Welcome to New Members – 1st July to 30th September 2018 Mr G Pearson, Stockton on Tees Mr N Holland, Lichfield Mr D Jones, Lichfield Ms F Reeves, Lichfield Ms J Bremner, Bristol Mr G Glover, Kings Bromley Mr & Mrs D Edwards, Stratford upon Avon Marina, Lichfield Mr & Mrs R Mobberley, Lichfield Mrs G Glover, Kings Bromley Mr A Littleton, Penkridge Marina, Lichfield The Hon Mrs J Perceval, Freeford, Lichfield Mr P Clark, Hopwas, Tamworth Mr R Smith, Lichfield Mr & Mrs G J Arblaster, Lichfield Mr P Pagett, Hednesford, Cannock Mrs S Elliott, Whittington, Lichfield Mr C Harris, Burntwood Mr S Haywood, Lichfield Mrs J H Roberts, Burntwood Mr O Hannaford-Day, Lichfield Mr I L Faultless, Heath Hayes, Cannock Mr A H Brown, Lichfield Mrs E Tyler, Chorley, Lichfield Mr N Cowley, Lichfield Mr C J Fozard, Lichfield Mr & Mrs M C Babb, Cheslyn Mr P Booth, Lichfield Hay,Walsall Dr S Lewis, Guildford Mr C Line, Lichfield Mr M Murphy, Walsall Membership Total at 30th September :- 1849 (Comprising 320 Adult, 932 Family, 206 Life, 386 Retired, 5 Other) Membership rates are: Adult £10; Family £15; Junior (under 18), Student, Retired or Unemployed £6; Group (Clubs & Societies) £25; Small Business £100, Large Corporate £200; Life Membership £200, Family Life Membership £300 (includes children up to age 18). To join, please contact the Membership Secretary (see above), view our website www.lhcrt.org.uk or email [email protected] Autumn 2018 Page 5 Our 500 Club gives members a chance to win prizes of up to £400 every three months! 50% of the 500 Club income will be retained for capital expenditure essential for restoration of our two canals… and 50% paid in prizes to its members. The number of subscriptions eligible for the September draw was 239. A rise in numbers will mean an increase in the contribution to the Capital Fund and the amount of prize money to be won. Anyone can subscribe, you don’t have to be a LHCRT member. During 2017 the ‘500 Club’ has paid out a total of £1,443 in prize money. This means that £1,443 has also been added to our Capital Fund. The Trust would like to thank all the subscribers for their continuing support. So please spread the word. The winners of the September 2018 draw are: First prize £ 187.98 No 200 Mr J Buckley, Nottinghamshire Second prize £ 122.91 No 267 Mr D Shipman, Cheshire Third prize £ 50.61 No 151 Mr K Major, Sussex The “500 Club” Capital Fund has been established to raise funds for capital expenditure on land purchase and rebuilding structures on the Lichfield and Hatherton Canals. For an annual subscription of £12 Club Members are allocated 1 chance in each of 4 successive quarterly draws. Based on a membership of 500, the maximum prizes will be: 1st Prize £400 approximately 26% income 2nd Prize £250 approximately 17% income 3rd Prize £100 approximately 7% income If there are more or less than 500 members, the prizes will be proportionally increased or decreased.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download an Application Form from Our Website Or Write to Mavis Moore, 88 Spring Lane, Whittington, Lichfield WS14 9NA
    The Magazine of the Lichfield & Hatherton Canals Restoration Trust Issue No. 82 - Winter 2014/15 BREAKING NEWS! - SEE INSIDE Peering out through the vegetation, a glimpse of the David Suchet Aqueduct; our ultimate goal on the Summerhill Section, 1-Jan-15 (see pages 14-17) HAY WHAR EET F L TR LICHFIELD TD S Heart of the Coventry Canal . TEL:01543 414808 MOBILE:0782 4848444 FAX:01543 414770 www.streethaywharf.co.uk 7-DAY CALL OUT SERVICE GEN SETS FITTED DIESEL AND SOLID FUEL STOVES FITTED BOTTOM BLACKING REPAINTING AND SIGNWRITING NEW BOATS FULL & PART FIT-OUT SUPPLIED ALL MECHANICAL / ELECTRICAL WORK FULL CHANDLERY STRETCHING AND REBOTTOMING GAS SAFE. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE ALL STEEL WORK AND TANKS Support the boat yard on the “Lichfield Ring” Boat Transport, England, Europe Cranage Arranged Site Surveys Complete Service for DIY Repairs Boat Hire Boat Fitting Diesel Pump Out Mooring Boat Sales Laundry Trent & Mersey Canal V.A.T No. 133609427 CHAIRMAN’S COLUMN BREAKING NEWS! AY WHA There is a great deal happening at the moment. The pace of progress is ratcheting ETH RF up with some dramatic activity about to happen. As ever, everything depends on E LT finding funding for specific projects and we have had many disappointments over the TR D years. Yet another occurred last summer when the prospect of an SIB Community . Group grant for work on the towpath trail was dashed (see Money Matters in this S issue). Then, last October this suddenly became active again and the same funding, of £336,000 was made available. This is a wonderful opportunity but it came with several stings in the tail.
    [Show full text]
  • Norton Aluminium Residents Liaison Committee- Meeting Minutes Norton Canes Community Centre, Brownhills Road, Norton Canes 16Th June 2016 1800-2030
    Norton Aluminium Residents Liaison Committee- Meeting Minutes Norton Canes Community Centre, Brownhills Road, Norton Canes 16th June 2016 1800-2030 List of Attendees Cllr John Bernard- Chairman of Liaison Committee & Norton Canes Parish Councilor. CCDC Mike Walker, Environmental Protection Manager Chris Richardson, Scientific Officer Norton Aluminium Trevor Bird Foundry Manager, Andrew Street, Environmental Manager, Wayne Harrison Production Manager Paul Clews, Maintenance Manager. Residents Rodney Brown- Vice Chairman Lenard Sharratt Robert Oddy Stephen Hawkins Paul Sanders Meeting opened Cllr Bernard opened the meeting and introduced himself as Chairman of the Norton Aluminum Liaison Committee. Confirmed Mr Rodney Brown was still Vice Chairman. Introductions All parties introduced themselves. Terms of reference- Purpose of meeting Cllr Bernard advised purpose of meeting was to continue to provide a forum at which issues relating to the operation of the site and any concerns of local residents, Councillors and Council Officers can be addressed. It was agreed by the committee that three meetings per year will continue to be held. Option to hold extraordinary meeting if required. Terms of reference agreed by all parties. Presentation by Norton Aluminium Presentation by Mr Wayne Harrison Foundry Manager providing overview of the process at Norton Aluminium. Detailed types of material the company melts (dross, engine blocks, pucks, coppers silicon, aluminium wheels etc) Provided an overview of the furnaces (rotaries & holding furnaces), extraction, launders and finished products. An example charge card passed around the group detailing how product information is required. Questions RO asked what happens as regards fumes & extraction within the plant. TB provided an overview of the DISA plant bag filtration system and how it operates.
    [Show full text]
  • 8. Cannock Project Area
    8. Cannock project area This product includes mapping licensed from Ordnance Survey with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Office © Crown copyright and/or database right 2009. All rights reserved. Licence number 100019422. Map 5: Cannock historic environment character zones (CHECZs) 21 8.1 CHECZ 1 – West of Pye Green 8.1.1 Summary on the historic environment The zone comprises a very large field, as depicted on map 6, which was created during the late 20th century through the removal of earlier internal boundaries. The field system was originally created as planned enclosure following an Act of Parliament to enclose (1868). Prior to this period the landscape had been dominated by heath land which had formed part of Cannock Chase. The nursery and its surrounding boundary also post date the Second World War. This product includes mapping data licensed from Ordnance Survey © Crown copyright and / or database right (2009). Licence no. 100019422 Map 6: The known heritage assets (sites referred to in the text are labelled). Of particular significance is the remains of a bank which follows the western boundary of the zone38. This feature is contiguous with the parish boundary between Huntington and Cannock. It is therefore possible that this bank was constructed in 38 Staffordshire HER: PRN 01039 22 the medieval or post medieval period to physically demarcate the parish bounds or the extent of the medieval manor of Cannock. 8.1.2 Heritage Assets Summary Table Survival The zone has seen moderate disturbance 2 from agricultural practices, although the earthwork bank was surviving in 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources Report for Staffordshire
    BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY TECHNICAL REPORT WF/95/5/ Mineral Resources Series Mineral Resource Information for Development Plans Staffordshire: Resources and Constraints D E Highley and D G Cameron Contributors: D P Piper, D J Harrison and S Holloway Planning Consultant: J F Cowley Mineral & Resource Planning Associates This report accompanies the 1:100 000 scale maps: Staffordshire Mineral resources (other than sand and gravel) and Staffordshire Sand and Gravel Resources Cover Photograph Cauldon limestone quarry at Waterhouses, 1977.(Blue Circle Industries) British Geological Survey Photographs. No. L2006. This report is prepared for the Department of the Environment. (Contract PECD7/1/443) Bibliographic Reference Highley, D E, and Cameron, D G. 1995. Mineral Resource Information for Development Plans Staffordshire: Resources and Constraints. British Geological Survey Technical Report WF/95/5/ © Crown copyright Keyworth, Nottingham British Geological Survey 1995 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of Survey publications is available from the BGS British Geological Survey Offices Sales Desk at the Survey headquarters, Keyworth, Nottingham. The more popular maps and books may be purchased from BGS- Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG approved stockists and agents and over the counter at the 0115–936 3100 Fax 0115–936 3200 Bookshop, Gallery 37, Natural History Museum (Earth Galleries), e-mail: sales @bgs.ac.uk www.bgs.ac.uk Cromwell Road, London. Sales desks are also located at the BGS BGS Internet Shop: London Information Office, and at Murchison House, Edinburgh. www.british-geological-survey.co.uk The London Information Office maintains a reference collection of BGS publications including maps for consultation. Some BGS Murchison House, West Mains Road, books and reports may also be obtained from the Stationery Office Edinburgh EH9 3LA Publications Centre or from the Stationery Office bookshops and 0131–667 1000 Fax 0131–668 2683 agents.
    [Show full text]
  • A5 Strategy 2018-2031
    A5 Strategy Supporting Growth and Movement in the Midlands 2018-2031 Foreword In response to the pressures and opportunities faced along the A5 corridor, the A5 Transport Partnership was formed in 2009/10. It includes representation from 17 local authorities, including local highway authorities, local planning authorities, as well as Local Enterprise Partnerships (LEPs). The A5 Partnership produced its first strategy for the corridor in 2011, providing an evidence base to inform the development of Local Plans, Local Transport Plans and policy, negotiations with developers and to support bids for infrastructure funding. Despite much progress being made, the increasing importance of the A5 as a strategic route, combined with the unprecedented level of housing and employment growth that will come forward along the corridor between now and 2031, means there is still much more to be delivered. Investment is required to ensure the A5 continues to fulfil its role as a key artery of movement that facilitates economic growth and provides network resilience for the wider Strategic Road Network. As a result the A5 Partnership felt that now was the right time to review the strategy, with a focus on the following key themes: Delivering Growth Supporting Network Resilience Delivering a safe and secure A5 Managing the impact of freight Delivering a sustainable A5 The Strategy covers the 77 mile section of the A5 from Gailey in Staffordshire to Stoney Stratford near Milton Keynes, and sets out the vision for the A5 by providing a framework for maintaining and improving the corridor for the next 13 years. There is significant support for the work of the A5 Partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • OPENING PANDORA's BOX David Cameron's Referendum Gamble On
    OPENING PANDORA’S BOX David Cameron’s Referendum Gamble on EU Membership Credit: The Economist. By Christina Hull Yale University Department of Political Science Adviser: Jolyon Howorth April 21, 2014 Abstract This essay examines the driving factors behind UK Prime Minister David Cameron’s decision to call a referendum if the Conservative Party is re-elected in 2015. It addresses the persistence of Euroskepticism in the United Kingdom and the tendency of Euroskeptics to generate intra-party conflict that often has dire consequences for Prime Ministers. Through an analysis of the relative impact of political strategy, the power of the media, and British public opinion, the essay argues that addressing party management and electoral concerns has been the primary influence on David Cameron’s decision and contends that Cameron has unwittingly unleashed a Pandora’s box that could pave the way for a British exit from the European Union. Acknowledgments First, I would like to thank the Bates Summer Research Fellowship, without which I would not have had the opportunity to complete my research in London. To Professor Peter Swenson and the members of The Senior Colloquium, Gabe Botelho, Josh Kalla, Gabe Levine, Mary Shi, and Joel Sircus, who provided excellent advice and criticism. To Professor David Cameron, without whom I never would have discovered my interest in European politics. To David Fayngor, who flew halfway across the world to keep me company during my summer research. To my mom for her unwavering support and my dad for his careful proofreading. And finally, to my adviser Professor Jolyon Howorth, who worked with me on this project for over a year and a half.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LONDON GAZETTE, Isr MARCH 1994
    3190 THE LONDON GAZETTE, Isr MARCH 1994 the special road, the construction and improvement of other Part of Fuel Oil Depot and part of Ogley Hay Road, all north of highways and the execution of other works mentioned above; Brownhills (owned by Charringtons Fuel Oils Limited) (30/443, (vi) use by the Secretary of State in connection with the 30/443a, 30/443b). construction and improvement of highways and the execution Part of the garden of SA Watling Street and half width of Chase of other works mentioned above; and Road, all north of Brownhills (owned by J, Wilkin and Mrs. J. (vii) mitigation of adverse effects which the existence or use of Wilkin) (30/2025). certain of the highways proposed to be constructed or improved by him as mentioned above will have on the surroundings. Land within the Parishes of Hammerwich, Wall, Shenstone or Weeford in the district of Lichfield in the county of Staffordshire (b) the land and rights described in Schedule 2 hereto for the provision of a maintenance compound in connection with the Half width of Hanney Hay Road; the right to backfill part of special road at Weeford, in the district of Lichfield, in the county of Crane Brook and to construct a box culvert in railway land; railway Staffordshire. land forming part of the Walsall to lichfield Line, all north-east of (c) the land described in Schedule 3 hereto for the purpose of Brownhills and Newton; railway line forming part of the Sutton being given in exchange for land which forms part of an open space.
    [Show full text]
  • Neighbourhood Plan
    HAMMERWICH NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN 2018-2040 August 2020 CONTENTS: PAGE 1 Background to Plan 3 2 Hammerwich’s History and Context 6 3 Planning Framework 9 4 Consultation 15 5 Issues and Vision 16 THE POLICIES 6 Parish and Community Facilities 19 7 Housing 23 8 Traffic and Transport 31 9 The Local Environment 39 10 The Local Economy 49 11 Education 50 12 Monitoring and Reviewing the Neighbourhood Plan 51 13 The Next Steps 52 Appendix 1. Projects Identified as Important to the Parish, to be Pursued by the Parish Council, Through Various Funding Sources Including Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) 53 2 1 Background to the Plan 1.1 The Localism Act 2011 promoted neighbourhood engagement in the planning process. It introduced a new kind of Plan, called a Neighbourhood Development Plan (or Neighbourhood Plan, for short), that could be prepared by Parish Councils. One of the key aims of the legislation is to enable people to contribute to the long term development of their own community. A Neighbourhood Plan can make a real difference to how development is carried out in the Parish, because once it has been through all the stages of preparation and been “made” (adopted) by Lichfield District Council (LDC), it becomes part of the District’s Development Plan, alongside the LDC Local Plan. Its planning policies will therefore be used in the decision-making process when planning applications within the Parish are considered by the Local Planning Authority. This Neighbourhood Plan supports the delivery of strategic policies contained in the Lichfield District Local Plan in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework 2019 para 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Cannock Chase District Housing Development Capacity Study 2018–38 March 2021
    CANNOCK CHASE DISTRICT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY STUDY 2018–38 MARCH 2021 Planning Policy Team Cannock Chase District Council V7 10/03/21 0 CANNOCK CHASE DISTRICT – DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY STUDY (HOUSING) CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. NATIONAL POLICY CONTEXT 3. REQUIRED CAPACITY OF LAND FOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT (2018-38) 3.1 Assessed Housing Need (2018-38) 3.2 Provision for the Needs of Neighbouring Areas under Duty to Co-operate 4. CONFIRMED HOUSING LAND SUPPLY CAPACITY (2018-38) 4.1 SHLAA Housing Completions (2018-20) 4.2 SHLAA Deliverable Sites 4.3 SHLAA Developable Sites (Adopted Local Plan Period to 2028) 4.4 Total Confirmed Housing Land Supply Capacity (2018-38) 5. POTENTIAL HOUSING LAND SUPPLY CAPACITY (2018-38) 5.1 SHLAA Developable Sites (Post Adopted Local Plan Period to 2028) 5.2 SHLAA ‘Restricted and Excluded’ Sites 5.3 Employment Land Availability Assessment ‘Restricted and Excluded’ Sites 5.4 Total Potential Housing Supply Capacity (2018-38) 6. OTHER POTENTIAL HOUSING LAND SUPPLY OPTIONS 6.1 SHLAA Green Belt and/or Green Space Network 6.2 ELAA Green Belt and Green Space Network 6.3 Restricted and Excluded Sites in Alternative Uses 6.4 Neighbourhood Plans 6.5 Cannock Chase Open Space Review 6.6 Housing Estates and Redevelopment 6.7 Public Sector Surplus Land 6.8 Reallocation of Existing Employment Land 6.9 Review of Brownfield Land Register and the National Land Use Database 6.10 Regeneration Sites Promoted for Residential Development 6.11 Sites where Planning Applications were Refused or Withdrawn (2018-20) 6.12 Contributions from Self Build Housing 6.13 Potential Contributions from new Permitted Development Rights 6.14 Contributions from Exception Sites 6.15 Reviewing Density Assumptions 6.16 Additional Potential Sites Identified During Study Process 7.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • Hednesford Neighbourhood Plan | 2018 1
    Neighbourhood Plan 2017-2028 Contents 1 The Neighbourhood Plan: Our story so far - Page 1 2 Why have a Neighbourhood Plan for Hednesford? - Pages 2-3 3 Hednesford time-line - Page 4 4 Statutory requirements relating to content of the plan - Page 5 5 Characteristics of the population of Hednesford - Pages 6-8 6 Vision for Hednesford - Page 9 7 Key issues and opportunities - Pages 10-13 8 Policies and proposals - Page 14 9 Hednesford Town Centre Policies - Pages 15-25 10 Public Rights Of Way Policies - Pages 26-27 11 Open Spaces Policies - Pages 28-29 12 Built Environment Policies - Pages 30-39 13 Housing Development Policies - Pages 40-45 14 Industrial/Business Parks Policies - Pages 46-48 15 Appendices - Pages 49-80 16 References/Sources - Pages 81-95 Hednesford Neighbourhood Plan | 2018 1 The Neighbourhood Plan: Our story so far Hednesford Neighbourhood Plan | 2018 1 - The Neighbourhood Plan: Our story so far Because we know our residents care about their town, they relished the opportunity to have a say in its future. We asked for views on: where public money how it is what features should be invested developed should be to make it a better preserved place for those who live and work here This was thanks to a new type of planning document, introduced by The Localism Act 2011, which can be used by town and parish councils to involve the community in decisions to help shape the future of their area. A Neighbourhood Plan is adopted following: CONSULTATION A REFERENDUM RESULT Members of the Local people will vote in If the Neighbourhood community were asked a referendum to state Plan is supported, it to share their opinions whether they agree will become part of the on policies that affect with the proposals statutory Development the town.
    [Show full text]
  • Cannock Wood Character Description: Rural Village Located Within the AONB with Outlying Pockets of Development and Farms Beyond Main Village
    Cannock Wood Character Description: Rural village located within the AONB with outlying pockets of development and farms beyond main village. Mainly residential with community facilities, including a village hall, church, school, pub and local shop, scattered around village. Key features are: Key Local Design Principles or ‘New developments should’: • Probable 17 th century origins with growth in the 19 th • Preserve and enhance locally distinctive and historic century associated with agriculture and nearby coal features including building lines along historic routes to mining. Developed in ‘linear’ pattern along main roads retain traditional settlement form. with later infill development. Church and school at eastern • Recognise scope for variety of good quality design/ end of village within Lichfield District (Gentleshaw). materials through area whilst respecting scale and layout of • Village dominated by post-war residential development, existing development, particularly in terms of density/plot with some surviving 19 th century and mid-20 th century size, allow space for safeguarding existing trees and property e.g. Wesleyan chapel built in 1836 in Chapel hedges, appropriate new planting to enhance character. Lane. Main street layout likely to be original. Other key • Respect variation between different residential styles in surviving features are historic farmsteads though adapted area, particularly promoting retention of locally distinctive to modern farming practices. historic features/detailing, typically ‘cottage’ style. • Post-war development varied in character, predominantly • Promote retention and enhancement of existing hedgerows low-medium density with detached 2 storey properties on and grass verges along highways. medium/large plots, but including bungalows. Incremental • Support buffer planting around urban edge which development has created variety in the style/design and complements wider AONB heathland/woodland landscape materials.
    [Show full text]