DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft 20150629

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft 20150629 DESCRIPTIVE CATALOGING OF RARE MATERIALS (MANUSCRIPTS) DRAFT 20150629 PREFACE Background Descriptive Cataloging of Rare Materials (Manuscripts) (referred to hereafter as DCRM(MSS)) is one of a family of manuals that form Descriptive Cataloging of Rare Materials (DCRM) (see introductory section I.1). It is based on Descriptive Cataloging of Rare Materials (Books) (DCRM(B)) but also draws on Describing Archives: A Content Standard (DACS), Descriptive Cataloging of Ancient, Medieval, Renaissance, and Early Modern Manuscripts (AMREMM), Archives, Personal Papers and Manuscripts (APPM) (the predecessor of DACS), and other manuals to help ensure full coverage of the issues raised by individual manuscripts. DCRM(MSS) originated from a request in 2004 by the Society of American Archivists (SAA) to the Rare Books and Manuscripts Section (RBMS) of the Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL) to create a companion standard to DACS that would provide instructions for describing modern manuscripts at the item level. The RBMS Bibliographic Standards Committee (BSC) took on the task and appointed an editorial team made up of archivists and catalogers to develop the present standard. DCRM(MSS) bridges the gap between the conventions of bibliographic and archival description. DCRM(MSS) is based on DCRM(B), the flagship DCRM module, and conforms to it as far as possible, but it also draws on DACS; AMREMM; Archives, Personal Papers and Manuscripts (APPM), the predecessor of DACS; and other manuals to help ensure full coverage of the issues raised by individual manuscripts in their various forms. Differences from other DCRM modules and from DACS DCRM(MSS) draws on both DCRM and DACS. The most notable differences from each are noted below: Key differences from other DCRM modules include: Descriptions not always constructed according to International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD) Emphasis on describing what a manuscript is rather than on recording how it presents itself DCRM(MSS), 06/29/15 ‐ 3 Transcription de‐emphasized Brackets not used for supplied or devised information In‐depth instruction for devising titles and supplying place and date information Emphasis on providing contextual information Areas 2, 3, 6, 8 not used Area 4 used for production information rather than publication, distribution, and manufacture information Key differences from DACS include: Descriptions not always constructed according to General International Standard Archival Description (ISAD(G)) In‐depth instruction for devising titles and supplying place and date information Instruction for transcribing formal titles Instruction on physical description of individual items Manual does not cover creation of authority records Manual contains substantially fewer instructions on acquisitions, access, and use elements Acknowledgments Sincere thanks go to Bill Landis for setting this manual in motion by approaching the RBMS Bibliographic Standards Committee about it. Randal Brandt, then chair of BSC, appointed the DCRM(MSS) editorial team. Bill Landis served as an ex‐ officio member of our team, and we had two SAA DACS Working Group liaisons: Kathryn (Kate) Bowers, Collection Services Archivist, Harvard University Archives; and the late Roslyn (Lynn) Holdzkom, Assistant Curator, Manuscripts Department, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. We would also like to thank our LC PSD liaison, Kate James. In addition, we thank the many others who helped to test and refine DCRM(MSS) throughout its development: Members of the Bibliographic Standards Committee since work on DCRM(MSS) began in January 2008: 3 Marcia H. Barrett Eileen Heeran Audrey Pearson Erin C. Blake Ryan Hildebrand Nina Schneider Randal S. Brandt Linda Isaac Stephen Skuce Jane Carpenter Francis Lapka Aislinn Sotelo Ann W. Copeland Martha Lawler James Stephenson Lori Dekydtspotter M. Winslow Lundy Bruce Tabb Christine A. DeZelar- Michelle Mascaro Eduardo Tenenbaum Tiedman Kate Moriarty Alex Thurman Emily Epstein Ann Myers Seanna Tsung David M. Faulds Margaret Nichols Catherine Uecker Todd Fell Jennifer K. Nelson Members of the DCRM Steering Group: Deborah J. Leslie Randal S. Brandt Elizabeth OʹKeefe John Attig Francis Lapka Manon Théroux Erin C. Blake Nancy Lorimer Special thanks go to Deborah Leslie, Bill Landis, and John Attig for lending us their deep expertise on bibliographical and archival description, and for helping us navigate the process of having our manual vetted and approved. Special thanks also go to Erin Blake, both for commenting extensively on our draft and for lending us her computer projector at crucial moments when we would have been sunk without it. We are also grateful to the people in addition to the above who read drafts, attended our meetings, participated in the public hearing, gave advice, and test‐ drove the manual: Virginia Bartow Gordon Daines Karen Spicher Matthew Beacom Robert Maxwell Larry Creider Nadia S. Seiler We are especially indebted to the Folger Shakespeare Library for hosting the meetings of our editorial team twice a year throughout the development of this manual. We are most grateful to Daniel De Simone, Librarian of the Folger, and Stephen Enniss and Richard Kuhta, former Librarians of the Folger, and all of the Folger staff whose hospitality made our work infinitely easier and more DCRM(MSS), 06/29/15 ‐ 5 enjoyable. We would specifically like to recognize the contributions of the late Nadia Sophie Seiler, rare materials cataloger at the Folger, who participated with us in many cataloging discussions and tested our draft standards on Folger manuscripts. Her insightful comments, enthusiastic support, and passion for manuscripts will always be remembered. INSERT Thanks to indexer; credits for images; credit for design of cover and title page thanks to inputter into cataloger’s desktop (Bruce Johnson), Kate James for her careful reading and thoughtful suggestions. Production babies: Sylvana, Thea, and Bruce. Most of all, I am profoundly grateful to my colleagues on the DCRM(MSS) editorial team: Alison E. Bridger, Archivist of Bibliographic Information Systems, Wisconsin Historical Society Diane Ducharme (SAA Liaison), Archivist, Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Yale University Kate Moriarty, Rare Book Catalog Librarian, St. Louis University Jennifer K. Nelson, Librarian, The Robbins Collection, UC Berkeley School of Law Elizabeth O’Keefe, Director of Collection Information Systems, The Morgan Library Heather Wolfe, Curator of Manuscripts, Folger Shakespeare Library It has truly been a privilege to associate with the members of this extraordinary group, whose hard work, unflagging commitment, sparkling sense of humor, and ingenuity in the face of fire‐breathing intellectual conundrums are an ongoing inspiration to their colleagues and a gift to the profession. They are my heroes. Margaret F. Nichols, Chair DCRM(MSS) Editorial Team [date to be supplied] 5 DCRM(MSS), 06/29/15 ‐ 6 INTRODUCTION Contents: I. Scope and purpose II. Relationship to other standards III. Objectives and principles IV. Options V. Language preferences VI. Spelling and style VII. Acronyms VIII. Examples and notes IX. Precataloging decisions I. Scope and purpose I.1. Descriptive Cataloging of Rare Materials DCRM(MSS) is one of a family of manuals providing specialized cataloging rules for various formats of rare materials typically found in rare book, archival, manuscript, and special collection repositories. The term “rare materials” refers to any materials that repositories have chosen to distinguish from general materials by the ways in which they house, preserve, or collect them. Rarity in the narrow sense of “scarcity” may or may not be a feature of these materials. Together, these manuals form Descriptive Cataloging of Rare Materials (DCRM), an overarching concept rather than a publication in its own right. I.2. Descriptive Cataloging of Rare Materials (Manuscripts) DCRM(MSS) provides guidelines and instructions for the description of individual textual manuscripts. The term “manuscript” includes unpublished textual items in handwriting, typescript, or computer printout. For manuscript cartographic materials and manuscript music, it is recommended to use standards specific to those materials, applying relevant aspects of DCRM(MSS) as appropriate. DCRM(MSS) is intended to serve as a companion standard to DACS, which is primarily for collection‐level description, and as a modern counterpart to AMREMM, which is primarily for describing manuscripts of the pre‐modern, scriptorium era. Printed books, as well as serials, graphic materials, cartographic materials, and music, are out of scope. For these types of materials, use DCRM(B), DCRM(S), DCRM(G), DCRM(C), and DCRM(M) respectively. 6 DCRM(MSS), 06/29/15 ‐ 7 I.3. Need for special rules Individual manuscripts present unique challenges not ordinarily encountered in the description either of printed books or of archival and manuscript collections. Descriptive standards developed mainly for published materials assume the presence of publisher‐supplied information presented in conventional form. Descriptive standards for groups or collections of manuscripts do not support the detailed level of description sometimes appropriate for individual manuscripts. The additional guidance in DCRM(MSS) helps catalogers supply both artifactual information and the contextual information users need to determine the manuscript’s research value. I.4. Scope of application DCRM(MSS) is appropriate for the item‐level
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Paläographie Der Neuzeit
    Paläographie der Neuzeit: (traditionellerweise oft „Schriftenkunde der Neuzeit“). Früher typisch im Kanon der archivischen Fächer situiert als reines Hilfsmittel (Vermittlung von Lesefähigkeiten für die Lektüre frühneuzeitlicher Archivalien). Grundlegendes Problem der Literatur: es existieren zwar viele Überblicke zu „nationalen“ Schriftentwicklungen in den europäischen Ländern, aber kaum eine Übersicht über die Gesamtperspektive. Späte Verwissenschaftlichung nach dem Vorbild der Paläographie des Mittelalters erst im 20. Jahrhundert, zuvor polemische metawissenschaftliche Diskussion etwa zur Fraktur-Antiqua-Debatte. „Zweischriftigkeit“: Deutschsprachige Texte werden bis zur Mitte des 19. Jahrhunderts immer in Kurrent (auch: Deutsche Schreibschrift) geschrieben, fremdsprachige Texte und Einschübe in deutschen Texten dagegen in aus dem humanistischen Schriftbereich abgeleiteten Schreibschriften. Grundsätzlich findet überall in Europa die Entwicklung der frühneuzeitlichen Schriften in zwei parallelen Bereichen statt: einerseits eine Weiterführung älterer spätgotischer Kursiven (mit teilweise charakteristischen „nationalen“ Einzelmerkmalen), andererseits eine Weiterentwicklung der aus Italien importierten humanistischen Kanzleischriften. In den einzelnen Regionen Europas wird dabei der „gotische“ Schriftstrang unterschiedlich früh oder spät auslaufen; am spätesten im deutschen Sprachraum (Kurrent als Schulausgangsschrift bis 1941 gelehrt). In der Frühen Neuzeit zunehmend dichte Publikation von gedruckten Schreibmeisterbüchern; diese ermöglichen
    [Show full text]
  • Detecting Forgery: Forensic Investigation of Documents
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Legal Studies Social and Behavioral Studies 1996 Detecting Forgery: Forensic Investigation of Documents Joe Nickell University of Kentucky Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Nickell, Joe, "Detecting Forgery: Forensic Investigation of Documents" (1996). Legal Studies. 1. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_legal_studies/1 Detecting Forgery Forensic Investigation of DOCUlllen ts .~. JOE NICKELL THE UNIVERSITY PRESS OF KENTUCKY Publication of this volume was made possible in part by a grant from the National Endowment for the Humanities. Copyright © 1996 byThe Universiry Press of Kentucky Paperback edition 2005 The Universiry Press of Kentucky Scholarly publisher for the Commonwealth, serving Bellarmine Universiry, Berea College, Centre College of Kentucky, Eastern Kentucky Universiry, The Filson Historical Sociery, Georgetown College, Kentucky Historical Sociery, Kentucky State University, Morehead State Universiry, Transylvania Universiry, University of Kentucky, Universiry of Louisville, and Western Kentucky Universiry. All rights reserved. Editorial and Sales qtJices:The Universiry Press of Kentucky 663 South Limestone Street, Lexington, Kentucky 40508-4008 www.kentuckypress.com The Library of Congress has cataloged the hardcover edition as follows: Nickell,Joe. Detecting forgery : forensic investigation of documents I Joe Nickell. p. cm. ISBN 0-8131-1953-7 (alk. paper) 1. Writing-Identification. 2. Signatures (Writing). 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Paläographie Einzelne Schriftarten Neuzeitliche Schriften
    Thomas Frenz: Bibliographie zur Diplomatik und verwandten Fachgebieten der Historischen Hilfswissenschaften mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Papsturkunden Paläographie einzelne Schriftarten neuzeitliche Schriften Atelier du Centre Généalogique de Touraine (Hg.): Introduction à la Paléographie, o.O.o.J. Bernhard Bischoff: Lettera mercantesca. In: Lexikon des gesamten Buchwesens, 2. Aufl., IV 506 Bernhard Bischoff: Mercantesca. In: Lexikon des gesamten Buchwesens, 2. Aufl., V 146 H. Buske: Deutsche Schrift. In: Lexikon des gesamten Buchwesens, 2. Aufl., II 263-265 H. Buske: Rounde hand. In: Lexikon des gesamten Buchwesens, 2. Aufl., VI 391 Lewis F. Day: Penmanship of the XVI, XVII, and XVIII Centuries T. N. Tacenko: U^cebniki pi^sma kak isto^cnik po istorii n^emeckogo kursiva XVI - XVII vv., Srednije veka 42()157-181 Th. Frenz: Secretary Hand. In: Lexikon des gesamten Buchwesens, 2. Aufl., VII 41 Thomas Frenz: Bollatica. In: Lexikon des gesamten Buchwesens, 2. Aufl., I 496 Thomas Frenz: Kanzleikurrent. In: Lexikon des gesamten Buchwesens, 2. Aufl., IV 152 Thomas Frenz: Kanzleischrift. In: Lexikon des gesamten Buchwesens, 2. Aufl., IV 152f. W. Milde: Retondilla (Redondilla). In: Lexikon des gesamten Buchwesens, 2. Aufl., VI 282 L. Strahlendorf: Die Entwicklung der Schrift und des Schreibunterichts in der neueren und neuesten Zeit, Berlin 1866 A. Bourmont: Manuel de paléographie des XVI - XVIII siècles, Caen 1881 Ficker, J. /Winckelmann: Handschriftenproben des sechzehnten Jahrhunderts nach Straßburger Originalen, Straßburg 1902 Stein,
    [Show full text]
  • Fonts for Latin Paleography 
    FONTS FOR LATIN PALEOGRAPHY Capitalis elegans, capitalis rustica, uncialis, semiuncialis, antiqua cursiva romana, merovingia, insularis majuscula, insularis minuscula, visigothica, beneventana, carolina minuscula, gothica rotunda, gothica textura prescissa, gothica textura quadrata, gothica cursiva, gothica bastarda, humanistica. User's manual 5th edition 2 January 2017 Juan-José Marcos [email protected] Professor of Classics. Plasencia. (Cáceres). Spain. Designer of fonts for ancient scripts and linguistics ALPHABETUM Unicode font http://guindo.pntic.mec.es/jmag0042/alphabet.html PALEOGRAPHIC fonts http://guindo.pntic.mec.es/jmag0042/palefont.html TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER Page Table of contents 2 Introduction 3 Epigraphy and Paleography 3 The Roman majuscule book-hand 4 Square Capitals ( capitalis elegans ) 5 Rustic Capitals ( capitalis rustica ) 8 Uncial script ( uncialis ) 10 Old Roman cursive ( antiqua cursiva romana ) 13 New Roman cursive ( nova cursiva romana ) 16 Half-uncial or Semi-uncial (semiuncialis ) 19 Post-Roman scripts or national hands 22 Germanic script ( scriptura germanica ) 23 Merovingian minuscule ( merovingia , luxoviensis minuscula ) 24 Visigothic minuscule ( visigothica ) 27 Lombardic and Beneventan scripts ( beneventana ) 30 Insular scripts 33 Insular Half-uncial or Insular majuscule ( insularis majuscula ) 33 Insular minuscule or pointed hand ( insularis minuscula ) 38 Caroline minuscule ( carolingia minuscula ) 45 Gothic script ( gothica prescissa , quadrata , rotunda , cursiva , bastarda ) 51 Humanist writing ( humanistica antiqua ) 77 Epilogue 80 Bibliography and resources in the internet 81 Price of the paleographic set of fonts 82 Paleographic fonts for Latin script 2 Juan-José Marcos: [email protected] INTRODUCTION The following pages will give you short descriptions and visual examples of Latin lettering which can be imitated through my package of "Paleographic fonts", closely based on historical models, and specifically designed to reproduce digitally the main Latin handwritings used from the 3 rd to the 15 th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertação Sandro Fetter ESDI 2011 COMPLETA
    Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Centro de Tecnologia e Ciências Escola Superior de Desenho Industrial Sandro Roberto Fetter Modelos caligráficos na Escola Brasileira: uma história do Renascimento aos nossos dias Rio de Janeiro 2011 Sandro Roberto Fetter Modelos caligráficos na Escola Brasileira: uma história do Renascimento aos nossos dias Dissertação apresentada como requisito parcial para obtenção do título de Mestre, ao Programa de Pós- Graduação em Design da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Área de concentração: Design. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Guilherme Cunha Lima Coorientadora: Profª. Dra. Edna Lúcia da Cunha Lima Rio de Janeiro 2011 CATALOGAÇÃO NA FONTE UERJ/REDE SIRIUS/BIBLIOTECA CTC/G F421 Fetter, Sandro Roberto. Modelos caligráficos na escola brasileira : uma história do Renascimento aos nossos dias / Sandro Roberto Fetter. - 2012. 258 f. : il. Orientador: Guilherme Cunha Lima Coorientador: Edna Lúcia da Cunha Lima . Dissertação (Mestrado). Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Escola Superior de Desenho Industrial. 1. Escrita - Teses. 2. Caligrafia (ensino) - Teses. 3. Tipografia - Teses. 4. Caligrafia – Teses. I. Lima, Guilherme Cunha. II. Lima, Edna Lúcia da Cunha Lima. III. Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Escola Superior de Desenho Industrial. IV. Título. CDU 003 Autorizo, apenas para fins acadêmicos e científicos, a reprodução total ou parcial desta dissertação, desde que citada a fonte. _________________________________ _____________________ Assinatura Data Sandro Roberto Fetter Modelos caligráficos na Escola Brasileira: uma história do Renascimento aos nossos dias Dissertação apresentada como requisito parcial para obtenção do título de Mestre, ao Programa de Pós- Graduação em Design da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.
    [Show full text]
  • La Materia De Los Sueños Isabelinos: La "Secretary Hand" (S. XVI-XVII)
    RECIBIDO: 28/05/13 ISSN: 1697-4328 REVISADO: 11/06/13 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_DOCU.2013.v11.42490 ACEPTADO: 13/06/13 LA MATERIA DE LOS SUEÑOS ISABELINOS: LA “SECRETARY HAND” (S. XVI-XVII) THE SUBSTANCE OF ELIZABETHAN DREAMS: THE “SECRETARY HAND” (16TH-17TH CENTURIES) BÁRBARA SANTIAGO MEDINA Universidad Complutense de Madrid Resumen: Durante los siglos XVI y XVII, la escritura más utilizada en Inglaterra fue la conocida como “secretary hand”. Se trató de un tipo específico de grafía gótica que alcanzó gran popularidad en época isabelina y jacobea y se empleó tanto para la factura de códices como de documentos. Coexistió junto a otras escrituras como la “itálica”, exitosa y recién llegada, concebida por los hu- manistas italianos; y las múltiples formas de “court hand”, una grafía gótica que puede encontrarse, en mayor medida, en textos legales. Este artículo pretende ser una introducción histórica al fenómeno de la “secretary hand”, presentando para ello un completo análisis paleográfico de la misma y transcripciones de diferentes casos prácticos. Palabras clave: Paleografía, Caligrafía, Historia Moderna. Abstract: In sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, the workaday hand in England was the so-called “secretary hand”. It was a specific type of gothic hand that became very popular throughout Eliza- bethan and Jacobean era, being used both for books and docu- ments. But “secretary hand” wasn’t the only hand used by En- glishmen in that period of history. It existed side by side with the “italic”, a successful and recently arrived script modelled by the Italian humanists, and the multiple forms of “court hands”, a gothic handwriting found on legal documents.
    [Show full text]
  • From Scribes to Types Peter Van Der Weij.Indd
    FROM SCRIBES TO TYPES THE INSPIRATIONS AND INFLUENCES FOR THE FIRST MOVABLE TYPES Research by: PETER VAN DER WEIJ Tutored by: ALBERT CORBETO Course: MÁSTER DE TIPOGRAFÍA AVANZADA (EINA Center de Disseny i Art de Barcelona) ABSTRACT This research is about exploring the period before and after the invention of the printing press. The journey that the first scripts made to be turned into movable type. The research consists of investigating and mapping the scripts that were chosen. The thesis has an analyti- cal view on each journey. Historical background, æsthetical influences, models, characteristics and comparison are criteria that have been investigated for each of these scripts. This research shed light on the aspects of the transition from script to moveable type and proves that the cul- tural and historical context, aesthetically choices play as important role as technical reasons for movable type to come to life. Knowing that as a type designer will help me to first under- stand and second revitalize the unexplored ideas in old scripts and typefaces. KEYWORDS: Printing press, Movable type, Scripts, History, Type design, Europe, Analytical, Adjustments, Transition. ii TABLE OF CONTENT INTRODUCTION 1 METHODOLOGY 3 THE GUTENBERG B42 5 THE FIRST PRINTED TYPE IN ITALY 8 THE FIRST ROMAN 12 ROMAN CAPITALS 12 PERFECTING THE SCRIPT 15 THE ITALIAN ROTUNDA 17 CAXTON TYPE 2 20 ITALIC 1 23 CONCLUSION 26 BIBLIOGRAPHY 27 INTRODUCTION This is a research about the first movable types in Europe and how they came to be. When I started my research about the transitional period from handwriting to printed books in Europe the focus was more on the technical challenges that the movable type makers ran into in order to create the first types.
    [Show full text]
  • From Law in Blackletter to “Blackletter Law”*
    LAW LIBRARY JOURNAL Vol. 108:2 [2016-9] From Law in Blackletter to “Blackletter Law”* Kasia Solon Cristobal** Where does the phrase “blackletter law” come from? Chasing down its origins uncov- ers not only a surprising turnabout from blackletter law’s original meaning, but also prompts examination of a previously overlooked subject: the history of the law’s changing appearance on the page. This history ultimately provides a cautionary tale of how appearances have hindered access to the law. Introduction .......................................................181 What the Law Looked Like: The Lay of the Land .........................185 Handwriting .....................................................185 Print ...........................................................187 Difficulties in Reading the Law ........................................189 Handwriting .....................................................190 Print ...........................................................193 Why Gothic Persisted Longest in the Law ...............................195 Gothic’s Symbolism ...............................................196 State Authority .................................................198 National Identity ...............................................199 The Englishness of English Law ...................................201 Gothic’s Vested Interests. .203 Printers .......................................................204 Clerks ........................................................205 Lawyers .......................................................209
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSPAPERS RESEARCH Chris Seggerman
    2 Pinal County Genealogists 2012 Genealogy Workshop Table of Contents 4 2012 Workshop Speakers 6 2012 Lecture Descriptions 8 A-1 FamilySearch.org Website Pam Ingermanson 12 B-1 Researching in Salt Lake Pam Ingermanson 15 B-2 Examining Handwriting Chris Seggerman 17 B-3, C-3 Unpuzzle Your Past - One Piece at a Time - Beginning Genealogy Kathleen Stewart Goodrich 20 B-4 First Steps Backward; Finding Your American Indian Roots Theda GoodFox Kresge 23 B-5 Using Your Digital Camera In Genealogical Research Jerry Flowers 26 C-1 If There’s a Will... I Want To Be In It! Clarice Bird 30 C-2 Basic British Research Melba Preece 34 C-4 Clues to Conclusiones Edie Sly 36 C-5 Do It! Indexing program Maurice Cavenee 38 D-1 German Resources Steve Packer 43 D-2, E-2 Writing Family History: A Gift for Generations toCome Duane Roen 46 D-3 Alternate Death Resources-Funeral Home and Cemetery Research Betty Cook 48 D-4 Courthouse Research Edie Sly 50 D-5 What’s In A Name Shirley Gage Hodges 52 E-1 Germans From Russia Steve Packer 57 E-3 Grandfathers Trunk - Uncovering Research Tips Bill Atkinson 59 E-4 Newspaper Research Chris Seggerman 61 E-5 There’s Gold In Them Thar Hills: Did Your Ancestor Go West? Shirley Gage Hodge Pinal County Genealogists 2012 Genealogy Workshop 3 2012 WORKSHOP SPEAKERS William Atkinson: A retired Printer/Purchasing Agent for Michigan State University. Bill has been doing genealogical research for over twenty years. A member of a number of Societies in the US, Canada and England, has coordinated a major genealogy conference and is a speaker at many societies and military groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Yes! You Can Read That Handwriting!
    Yes! You Can Read That Handwriting! [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] In-Lab Preparation: This will be a large class of individuals with varying levels of experience – Watch your screen and your neighbor’s. Catch a lab assistant when you need assistance. Yes, you can read almost any document in almost any language (Just try!) 1. Start from what you know – a name, a place, numerals. a. Find your name in a document – your own name, or a parent’s name – a name you are familiar with. b. Where and when was the document created? 2. Compare a variety of documents/handwriting of the same people. Look for older records (begin with the census), work back to become familiar with the handwriting changes. a. See how different your name appears in different documents with different handwriting. 3. Trace the handwriting: Trace on plastic sheet to feel the flow used by the original author. 4. Look and Write: Write on paper. Can you make the letters look the same as in the document? 5. Study the handwriting - Search “handwriting”, “script”, “old handwriting guides” a. Handwriting guides, alphabet samples from the time period, language, and location of your document from FamilySearch Wiki, Google, etc. b. Online Hand Writing Tutorials (see below) c. Use foreign word lists to help decipher difficult words i. FamilySearch > Search > Wiki > [language] word list > Ctl+F to search for the group of letters you have been able to identify. Move through the hits to compare to the typed foreign word with the handwritten foreign word d.
    [Show full text]
  • Italic Letters Calligraphy and Handwriting Pdf
    Italic Letters Calligraphy And Handwriting Pdf Blindfolded Sander mistrusts her rawhides so incommunicatively that Ingram encrusts very infectiously. Monopetalous and heteropterous Paolo photosynthesize, but Trenton godlessly nickeling her celluloid. Wilek remains Brazilian: she bechance her lumbers bump-starts too bearably? The Jumbo pencil is the widest option, ideal for beginning writers, and glacier also features a much thicker lead. This PDF book contain xanthidae megalopa description information. Or page from its and pdf book incorporate welcome to avoid duplicate bindings if you want a font that number of the sequence for the. His graduatedscheme detailed what was expected of children because each age buzz about the bucket of each century. Hier findest du kostenlose Printables, Freebies über Moderne Kalligraphie und Handlettering. Students quickly the letter formation on the smaller lines and exhale with linking letters and before practice writing days of the envelope and months of the boss before getting onto writing sentences. She recognized his blue jeans, the yellow party hat, game the six red flannel shirt. Someone like someone and italic letters such an open! In the agreement scheme of things Yellow Dog bed just spilled milk. Rules Describing an Elephant curves that far how cursive lines are actually. Most popular with the start downloading the and letters foundation for the history and all our promotional literature. Some wrap the worksheets displayed are Lettering practice point, A z practice work cursive handwriting, Cursive writing practice, know the sentences, Lettering practice a, Better county for adults, Practice masters, Italics beautiful habitat for children. They worked wonders for off hand eating, too, low I no longer retrieve the hurt to put aside much pressure on the pen while writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Latin Paleography (Fonts for Latin Script)
    FFFONTS FOR LATIN PPPALEOGRAPHY Capitalis elegans, capitalis rustica, uncialis, semiuncialis, antiqua cursiva romana, merovingia, insularis majuscula, insularis minuscula, visigothica, beneventana, carolina minuscula, gothica rotunda, gothica textura prescissa, gothica textura quadrata, gothica cursiva, gothica bastarda, humanistica. User's manual 4th edition June 2014 Juan-José Marcos [email protected] Professor of Classics. Plasencia. (Cáceres). Spain. Designer of fonts for ancient scripts and linguistics ALPHABETUM Unicode font http://guindo.pntic.mec.es/jmag0042/alphabet.html PALEOGRAPHIC fonts http://guindo.pntic.mec.es/jmag0042/palefont.html TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER Page Table of contents 2 Introduction 3 Epigraphy and Paleography 3 The Roman majuscule book-hand 4 Square Capitals (capitalis elegans) 5 Rustic Capitals (capitalis rustica) 8 Uncial script (uncialis) 10 Old Roman cursive (antiqua cursiva romana) 13 New Roman cursive (nova cursiva romana) 16 Half-uncial or Semi-uncial (semiuncialis) 19 Post-Roman scripts or national hands 22 Germanic script (scriptura germanica) 23 Merovingian minuscule (merovingia, luxoviensis minuscula) 24 Visigothic minuscule (visigothica) 27 Lombardic and Beneventan scripts (beneventana) 30 Insular scripts 33 Insular Half-uncial or Insular majuscule (insularis majuscula) 33 Insular minuscule or pointed hand (insularis minuscula) 38 Caroline minuscule (carolingia minuscula) 45 Gothic script (gothica prescissa, quadrata, rotunda, cursiva, bastarda) 51 Humanist writing (humanistica antiqua) 77 Epilogue 80 Bibliography and resources in the internet 81 Price of the paleographic set of fonts 82 Paleographic fonts for Latin script 2 Juan-José Marcos. [email protected] INTRODUCTION The following pages will give you short descriptions and visual examples of Latin lettering which can be imitated through my package of "Paleographic fonts", closely based on historical models, and specifically designed to reproduce digitally the main Latin handwritings used from the 3rd to the 15th century.
    [Show full text]