DOCSLIB.ORG

Ideas of Martyrdom in Early Stuart Public Debates, 1603 - 1649

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Ideas of Martyrdom in Early Stuart Public Debates, 1603 - 1649 Johannes Huhtinen Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Florence, 12 December 2017 European University Institute Department of History and Civilization Ideas of Martyrdom in Early Stuart Public Debates, 1603 - 1649 Johannes Huhtinen Thesis submitted for assessment with a view to obtaining the degree of Doctor of History and Civilization of the European University Institute Examining Board Professor Martin van Gelderen (Lichtenberg-Kolleg, University of Göttingen) Professor Luca Molà (EUI) Professor Peter Lake (Vanderbilt University) Professor Markku Peltonen (University of Helsinki) © Johannes Huhtinen, 2017 No part of this thesis may be copied, reproduced or transmitted without prior permission of the author Researcher declaration to accompany the submission of written work Department of History and Civilization - Doctoral Programme I Johannes Kristian Huhtinen certify that I am the author of the work Ideas of Martyrdom in Early Stuart Public Debates, 1603 - 1649 I have presented for examination for the Ph.D. at the European University Institute. I also certify that this is solely my own original work, other than where I have clearly indicated, in this declaration and in the thesis, that it is the work of others. I warrant that I have obtained all the permissions required for using any material from other copyrighted publications. I certify that this work complies with the Code of Ethics in Academic Research issued by the European University Institute (IUE 332/2/10 (CA 297). The copyright of this work rests with its author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This work may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. This authorisation does not, to the best of my knowledge, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that this work consists of 102631 words. Statement of language correction: This thesis has been corrected for linguistic and stylistic errors. I certify that I have checked and approved all language corrections, and that these have not affected the content of this work. Signature and date: October 13, 2017 vi vii ABSTRACT The first Protestant martyrology was printed at London during the spring of 1563. This vernacular work by the humanist John Foxe, entitled Acts and Monuments, was the largest account of martyrs produced by the Reformation movement, being dedicated to the memory of hundreds of recently executed contemporaries. It was also an innovative ecclesiastical history, aiming to supersede many traditional frames of reference, notably by situating martyrs and other theological concepts within the context of Reformation history and doctrine. Even after the number of martyrs executed at the scaffold had diminished, educated elites, theologians, divines, and the common people still grew up surrounded by Foxe’s stories. While historians have rightly situated Acts and Monuments within the urgent debates of the martyrologist’s own time, relatively few scholars have explored the subsequent development of ideas of martyrdom in the context of the longer reformation. This doctoral thesis studies Foxe as a reformer and writer whose intellectual impact went beyond the sixteenth century. In this regard, it is important to acknowledge that his works left many traces on post-Reformation literary culture, and that the Foxeian martyrs continued to exercise a strong hold over the popular imagination during the Stuart period. This study is essentially an attempt to establish exactly how martyrs figured in historical understanding, and in what ways their example and authority determined patterns of reasoning. Focusing on a variety of literary sources written during the most famous disputes of the seventeenth century, I seek to demonstrate the crucial position that recently executed martyrs occupied within the language of historical argument. My aim is also to show that Foxe’s work provided a structure for much thinking during the early modern period, and that the examples of reformed martyrs were important in shaping public opinion throughout the Stuart dynasty. In short, this is a study of martyrs, their admirers, and the uses to which their stories were put in print. On a broader level, it is a study of ideas of martyrdom in the aftermath of the sixteenth-century British Reformations. viii ix Contents 1 Introduction: The English culture of martyrdom 1 1.1 The Foxeian reformation 2 1.2 Bringing martyrs into the Stuart public sphere 15 1.3 The key-concept and the scope of the work 19 2 The Jesuit mission and the martyrs of Jacobean England 31 2.1 Introduction 31 2.2 The Status of Catholic subjects under James 34 2.3 Martyred Romanists challenge the legitimacy of the government 41 2.4 Martyrdom after the Powder Plot 51 2.5 Catholic martyrs in reformed culture 60 2.6 Conclusion 70 3 Martyrdom during the Carolinian controversies of the 1620s 73 3.1 Introduction 73 3.2 The rise of the Arminian party and the battle for English Protestantism 76 3.3 Invoking the testimony of martyrs against the innovations of anti-Calvinists 86 x 3.4 Conservative reactions: parliamentary appeals to Reformation legacies 91 3.5 Resistance against ceremonialists 103 3.6 Defending the royal church against populist libellers 108 3.7 Conclusion 114 4 Remembering Marian martyrs during the Personal Rule of Charles I 117 4.1 Introduction 117 4.2 Laudian ritualism and its opponents 119 4.3 Foxeian themes in Caroline church reform 123 4.4 Puritans, Laudians and the electrifying appropriation of Foxeian martyrs 134 4.5 Puritan trials polarize the consensus in religion 147 4.6 Conclusion 155 5 Church government and bishop-martyrs during the Bishops’ Wars 159 5.1 Introduction 159 5.2 Scottish troubles in England: the fury against episcopacy 161 5.3 Martyrdom in the debate over church governance 166 5.4 The testimony of dead bishops 169 5.5 Radical reformation and the heritage of bishop-martyrs 178 5.6 Conclusion 190 6 The Culture of Martyrdom during the English Civil Wars: From persecution to toleration 193 6.1 Introduction 193 xi 6.2 Martyrs’ passivity and military aggression: Confronting the martyrological rhetoric of non-resistance 198 6.3 The founding of the Westminster Assembly and the reconsideration of the boundaries of toleration 207 6.4 Employing martyrs against heresiographers 216 6.5 Martyrdom, persecution, and the making of a royalist hagiography 225 6.6 Conclusion 235 Conclusion: The afterlife of the Foxeian worldview 237 Bibliography 245 xii xiii Acknowledgements Completion of this study would not have been possible without the help of many people. My greatest debt is to Martin van Gelderen, who guided and supported this project from its inception. I have been especially fortunate in having Martin as my supervisor. His wit, wisdom, and patience has been invaluable, as well as his intellectual and personal support. I would also like to express my deep gratitude to Peter Lake for his indispensable advice and genuine warmth. Peter has been particularly generous in discussing at length the matters addressed in this work. I am very grateful to him for his immense generosity in reading and discussing my work in Florence, Nashville, Göttingen, and London. I also wish to express my gratitude to Luca Molà, who has always offered his help when needed. I must also express gratitude to Markku Peltonen and Auvo Kostiainen, who helped me to begin this project. I would also like to thank the staff of the Department of European and World History, University of Turku. I have had the good fortune to have Leila Koivunen, Taina Syrjämaa, Pertti Grönholm, Janne Tunturi, Raita Merivirta, Heli Paalumäki, Tuomas Räsänen, and Eero Kuparinen as teachers. They have encouraged me in so many ways. Special thanks to Antti-Jussi Nygård for his technical assistance. I gratefully acknowledge the financial support that many institutions have offered to my doctoral studies. I was able to study for several years thanks to the generosity of the Finnish Academy. The material assistance of the Finnish Cultural Foundation and TOP- säätiö have likewise facilitated my research. I benefited greatly from a visit to the Department of History, Vanderbilt University, and I particularly wish to thank Sandy Solomon, who welcomed me with a warmth that one rarely experiences. Thus, it is a true pleasure to thank Sandy for her hospitality during my stay in Nashville. I am also most thankful to Matthew, Nitin, and Jacob for making my visits to Vanderbilt such an enjoyable experience. xiv Over the last few years I have been fortunate enough to be part of a vibrant community of intellectual historians at the European University Institute. I would like to thank Kaarlo Havu, Jonas Gerlings, Brian Olesen, Matti La Mela, Giovanni Lista, and Tommaso Giordani for academic support and constructive criticism. They have shared their knowledge with me, given me new ideas, and will always remain inspiring friends. I owe far more than the usual debt to Alex Jordan. He has been a good friend, colleague, and an outstanding guide to London. He is also a sensitive and informed reader, and I would like to offer my special thanks to Alex for his thoughtful editing. The company of the researchers at the EUI has been a great support. A special note of gratitude goes to Haakon Ikonomou, Pernille Hansen, Lauri Tähtinen, Diana Natermann, Laura Almagor, David Freis, Florian Wagner, Julia Wambach, Diederik Boertien, Nicolás Castillo, Tim Bruyninckx, Johann Leiß, Per Tiedtke, Petri Koikkalainen, Jakob Lehne, Vedran Duancic, Pablo Abascal, Andrea Warnecke, Justiina Dahl, David Kleimann, and Kalle Kananoja. And, despite years of absence, I still have friends back home. Thanks too to many friends, especially Jarmo, Juho, Elli, Johannes, Anna-Riina, Jaakko, Krista, Veera, Mika, Heikki, Elisa, Henri, Laura, Sanna, Petra, Mikko, Ruut, and Eero.
Recommended publications
  • 2017 SPSA Conference Program

    2017 SPSA Conference Program

    DETAILED PROGRAM JANUARY 12–14, 2017 NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA Sponsored by The University of Chicago Press, publishers of the Journal of Politics 1 www.spsa.net 2 Southern Political Science Association • 88th Annual Conference • January 12–14, 2017 • New Orleans Table of Contents Plenary Events and Sessions 7 – 11 Hotel Maps 12 – 15 Things To Do In The Central Business District 16 – 17 Committees 2015 – 2016 18 – 19 Award Winners 25 – 27 Professional Development 28 Authors Meet Critics 28 Round Tables 29 Mini-Conferences 30 – 35 2016 Program Committee 36 – 37 Conference Overview 38 – 55 Panels Listings 56 – 235 Thursday 56 – 112 Friday 113 – 158 Saturday 159 – 213 Participant Index 214 – 225 2017 Program Committee 226 – 227 3 88th Annual Conference Officers and Staff 2016-2017 President William G. Jacoby, Michigan State University President Elect Judith Baer, Texas A&M University Vice President Jeff Gill, Washington University in St.Louis Vice President Elect Saundra Schneider, Michigan State University 2019 President David Lewis, Vanderbilt University Executive Director Robert Howard, Georgia State University Secretary Lee Walker, University of North Texas Treasurer Sue Tolleson-Rinehart, University of North Carolina Past President Ann Bowman, Texas A&M University Executive Council Jasmine Farrier, University of Louisville Pearl Ford Dowe, University of Arkansas Susan Haire, University of Georgia D. Sunshine Hillygus, Duke University Cherie Maestas, Florida State University Seth McKee, Texas Tech University D’Andra Orey, Jackson State University Kirk Randazzo, University of South Carolina Mary Stegmaier, University of Missouri Journal of Politics Editors Jeffery A. Jenkins, University of Virginia, Editor-in Chief Elisabeth Ellis, University of Otago Sean Gailmard, University of California, Berkeley Lanny Martin, Rice University Jennifer L.
  • Title Page R.J. Pederson

    Title Page R.J. Pederson

    Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/22159 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation Author: Pederson, Randall James Title: Unity in diversity : English puritans and the puritan reformation, 1603-1689 Issue Date: 2013-11-07 Chapter 3 John Downame (1571-1652) 3.1 Introduction John Downame (or Downham) was one of the greatest exponents of the precisianist strain within Puritanism during the pre-revolutionary years of the seventeenth century, a prominent member of London Puritanism, and renowned casuist.1 His fame rests chiefly in his nineteen published works, most of which were works of practical divinity, such as his four-part magnum opus, The Christian Warfare (1604-18), and his A Guide to Godlynesse (1622), a shorter, though still copious, manual for Christian living. Downame was also known for his role in publishing two of the most popular theological manuals: Sir Henry Finch’s The Summe of Sacred Divinitie (1620), which consisted of a much more expanded version of Finch’s earlier Sacred Doctrine (1613), and Archbishop James Ussher’s A Body of Divinitie (1645), which was published from rough manuscripts and without Ussher’s consent, having been intended for private use.2 Downame also had a role in codifying the Westminster annotations on the Bible, being one of a few city ministers to work on the project, though he never sat at the Westminster Assembly.3 Downame’s older brother, 1 Various historians from the seventeenth century to the present have spelled Downame’s name differently (either Downame or Downham). The majority of seventeenth century printed works, however, use “Downame.” I here follow that practice.
  • DISSERTATION-Submission Reformatted

    DISSERTATION-Submission Reformatted

    The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 By Robert Lee Harkins A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair Professor Jonathan Sheehan Professor David Bates Fall 2013 © Robert Lee Harkins 2013 All Rights Reserved 1 Abstract The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 by Robert Lee Harkins Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair This study examines the problem of religious and political obedience in early modern England. Drawing upon extensive manuscript research, it focuses on the reign of Mary I (1553-1558), when the official return to Roman Catholicism was accompanied by the prosecution of Protestants for heresy, and the reign of Elizabeth I (1558-1603), when the state religion again shifted to Protestantism. I argue that the cognitive dissonance created by these seesaw changes of official doctrine necessitated a society in which religious mutability became standard operating procedure. For most early modern men and women it was impossible to navigate between the competing and contradictory dictates of Tudor religion and politics without conforming, dissimulating, or changing important points of conscience and belief. Although early modern theologians and polemicists widely declared religious conformists to be shameless apostates, when we examine specific cases in context it becomes apparent that most individuals found ways to positively rationalize and justify their respective actions. This fraught history continued to have long-term effects on England’s religious, political, and intellectual culture.
  • The Driving Forces Behind Foxe's Book of Martyrs

    The Driving Forces Behind Foxe's Book of Martyrs

    The Driving Forces Behind Foxe’s Book of Martyrs Thesis We assert that Foxe’s Book of Martyrs was published for these purposes: personal reasons, a tribute to Queen Elizabeth, and to gain support for the Protestant faith and belief. A Tribute to Queen Elizabeth In 1553, Foxe and his wife fled to Europe when Queen Mary took the throne of England.2 Some of Foxe’s friends that stayed in England were arrested and eventually burned. While in Europe, he became friends with other scholars who encouraged him to continue with his Book of Martyrs. Foxe returned to England in 1559 after Queen Elizabeth came to the throne because she seemed to be a more tolerant monarch than Queen Mary.2 Foxe published Foxe’s Book of Martyrs in Latin 1559 and was based largely off of history books and the deaths that could be found in them—in 1563 he published his first English edition. Foxe travelled John Foxe’s Background around England freely under the reign of Queen Elizabeth, gathering witness accounts, letters, and official records John Foxe was born in 1517 in Boston, Lincolnshire, England. In the year of of martyrs. He dedicated his first English edition to the “most Christian and renowned princess, Queen 1534, he began his college career at Brasenose College. Foxe was raised a Catholic, but when he Elizabeth”2. A second edition is published in 1570 and his book is placed in many churches around England next to entered Oxford University he quickly became a supporter of the ideas of Martin Luther and Luther’s the bible, to further help the Protestant religion gain support and followers.
  • Popular Literature and Social Protest, 1485-1558. Francis Edward Abernethy Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College

    Popular Literature and Social Protest, 1485-1558. Francis Edward Abernethy Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College

    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1956 Popular Literature and Social Protest, 1485-1558. Francis Edward Abernethy Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Abernethy, Francis Edward, "Popular Literature and Social Protest, 1485-1558." (1956). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 137. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/137 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. POPULAR LITERATURE AND SOCIAL PROTEST, 1 AS5-1558 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of English by Francis Edward Abernethy B. A., Stephen F* Austin State College, 1949 M. A., Louisiana State University, 1951 June, 1956 ACKNOWLEDGMENT I wish to express my deepest appreciation to my advisor, Dr. Waldo F. McNeir, for his generous assistance and helpful criticism during the writing of this dissertation and to Dr. Walter Richardson, whose excellent course in Tudor history provided background and inspira­ tion for this work. I would also like to thank Drs. John E. Uhler, Robert B. Holtman, Joan C. Miller, and John H. Wildman for their critic­ ism of this paper. For material aid, thanks to beneficent relatives, the appointments committee of the English department, and the Wild Life and Fisheries Commission, especially Messrs.
  • Romanism and the Reformation

    Romanism and the Reformation

    ROMANISM AND THE REFORMATION. ROMANISM AND THE REFORMATION FROM THE STANDPOINT OF PROPHECY. r,Y H. GRATTAN GUINNESS, F.R.G.S., ' ' " A uthor of Lightfor tke Last Days" The Approaching End of the Age" etc. TORONTO: S. R. BRIGGS, TORONTO WILLARD TRACT DEPOSITORY AND BIBLE DEPOT, CORNER OF YONGE AND TEMPERANCE STREETS. BUTLER & TANNER, THE SELWOOD PRINTING WORKS, FROME, AND LONDON. PREFACE. r I "'HE following lectures were delivered, by re- quest, under the auspices of the Protestant Educational Institute, at Exeter Hall, in the spring of this year. That Institute exists to do a much needed work to keep alive, especially in the hearts of the rising generation, some measure of intelligent sympathy with the Protestant traditions of our country. England's Protestantism has long been Eng- land's glory, and the direct cause of her unrivalled prosperity and peculiar pre-eminence among the nations of Europe. That Protestantism is now sustaining a double attack, from without and from within. Yet few seem fully alive to the danger. The late Lord Beaconsfield saw it clearly enough " however. Your empire and your liberties are " more in danger at this moment," he said, than when Napoleon's army of observation was en- viii Preface. camped at Boulogne." What would he have said had he lived to see the present position of affairs ! The Reformation of the sixteenth century, which gave birth to Protestantism, was based on Scrip- ture. It gave back to the world the Bible. It the it the errors and taught Scriptures ; exposed corruptions of Rome by the use of the sword of the Spirit.
  • Theology of the Westminster Confession, the Larger Catechism, and The

    Theology of the Westminster Confession, the Larger Catechism, and The

    or centuries, countless Christians have turned to the Westminster Standards for insights into the Christian faith. These renowned documents—first published in the middle of the 17th century—are widely regarded as some of the most beautifully written summaries of the F STANDARDS WESTMINSTER Bible’s teaching ever produced. Church historian John Fesko walks readers through the background and T he theology of the Westminster Confession, the Larger Catechism, and the THEOLOGY The Shorter Catechism, helpfully situating them within their original context. HISTORICAL Organized according to the major categories of systematic theology, this book utilizes quotations from other key works from the same time period CONTEXT to shed light on the history and significance of these influential documents. THEOLOGY & THEOLOGICAL of the INSIGHTS “I picked up this book expecting to find a resource to be consulted, but of the found myself reading the whole work through with rapt attention. There is gold in these hills!” MICHAEL HORTON, J. Gresham Machen Professor of Systematic Theology and Apologetics, Westminster Seminary California; author, Calvin on the Christian Life WESTMINSTER “This book is a sourcebook par excellence. Fesko helps us understand the Westminster Confession and catechisms not only in their theological context, but also in their relevance for today.” HERMAN SELDERHUIS, Professor of Church History, Theological University of Apeldoorn; FESKO STANDARDS Director, Refo500, The Netherlands “This is an essential volume. It will be a standard work for decades to come.” JAMES M. RENIHAN, Dean and Professor of Historical Theology, Institute of Reformed Baptist Studies J. V. FESKO (PhD, University of Aberdeen) is academic dean and professor of systematic and historical theology at Westminster Seminary California.
  • Calvinism in America

    Calvinism in America

    Nebula7.4, December 2010 Participation, Democracy, and the Split in Revolutionary Calvinism, 1641 – 1646. By Tod Moore & Graham Maddox Abstract During the early phase of the revolutionary period in Britain (1641-46) an ideological divergence took place between fractions labelled Independent and Presbyterian. Our study of printed sources for this period uses debates over the meaning and relevance of the Greek term „democracy‟ to attempt a mapping of these emergent ideologies within revolutionary Calvinism. We find a contested social terrain with the Presbyterians supporting the revolutions from a socially conservative position and the Independents favouring radical social change. The years 1641 to 1646 saw “a transformation of the political nation, the beginning of mass politics, and a rapid and revolutionary expansion of what is sometimes called the „public sphere‟ [which] brought “men that do not rule” (and sometimes women too) into active engagement with public affairs” (Cressy 2003: 68). In particular there were a great number of books and pamphlets written by the leading Calvinists and these reveal a surprising amount of interest in democracy. A modern consensus that democracy did not come into fashion as an idea until the mid-nineteenth century is questioned by the prominence given to democracy in the controversy over the reconstruction of the church between the Presbyterians and the Independents in the 1640s. We know that “democracy” survived from ancient times within the “mixed constitution,” where it was blended with monarchy and aristocracy. We ask whether the strains of conflict, especially the attitudes and practises of the Independents, loosened the internal bonds of the mixed constitution, undermining claims of kingship and challenging elites.
  • The Theology of Grace in the Thought of Jacobus Arminius and Philip Van Limborch: a Study in the Development of Seventeenth Century Dutch Arminianism

    The Theology of Grace in the Thought of Jacobus Arminius and Philip Van Limborch: a Study in the Development of Seventeenth Century Dutch Arminianism

    The Theology of Grace in the Thought of Jacobus Arminius and Philip van Limborch: A Study in the Development of Seventeenth Century Dutch Arminianism By John Mark Hicks A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Westminster Theological Seminary In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy 1985 Faculty Advisor: Dr. Richard C. Gamble Second Faculty Reader: Mr. David W. Clowney Chairman, Field Committee: Dr. D. Claire Davis External Reader: Dr. Carl W. Bangs 2 Dissertation Abstract The Theology of Grace in the Thought of Jacobus Arminius and Philip van Limborch: A Study in the Development of Seventeenth Century Dutch Arminianism By John Mark Hicks The dissertation addresses the problem of the theological relationship between the theology of Jacobus Arminius (1560-1609) and the theology of Philip van Limborch (1633-1712). Arminius is taken as a representative of original Arminianism and Limborch is viewed as a representative of developed Remonstrantism. The problem of the dissertation is the nature of the relationship between Arminianism and Remonstrantism. Some argue that the two systems are the fundamentally the same, others argue that Arminianism logically entails Remonstrantism and others argue that they ought to be radically distinguished. The thesis of the dissertation is that the presuppositions of Arminianism and Remonstrantism are radically different. The thesis is limited to the doctrine of grace. There is no discussion of predestination. Rather, the thesis is based upon four categories of grace: (1) its need; (2) its nature; (3) its ground; and (4) its appropriation. The method of the dissertation is a careful, separate analysis of the two theologians.
  • The Great Tew Circle, 1630-1639

    The Great Tew Circle, 1630-1639

    Athens Journal of History XY The Great Tew Circle, 1630-1639 By Michael J. Langford The Great Tew Circle comprised a group of theologians, philosophers and poets who met regularly in Lord Falkland's house at Great Tew, near Oxford, from the early 1630s until around 1639. Although strongly royalist and Anglican, on many matters, especially that of toleration, they defended views that would later be classed as liberal.1 This article introduces the reader to the Great Tew Circle, and explores its relationship with the better- known Cambridge Platonists, most of whom flourished a few decades later. Common ground included the influence of Plato and an appeal to 'reason', although exactly how reason should to be understood raises interesting issues. Introduction The Great Tew Circle comprised a collection of theologians, philosophers and poets who met together in Lord Falkland's house at Great Tew, about sixteen miles from Oxford, from the early 1630s until around 1639 when rumbles of the civil war – which broke out in 1642 -- summoned Falkland to matters of state, and the group discussions were discontinued. Thereafter, despite the deaths of Falkland and Chillingworth, the Circle maintained some influence and a degree of association between many of its members remained, in part through the continued patronage of Falkland's widow. At first sight, the Restoration of Charles II in 1660 might seem to mark a kind of success for the aspirations of the Circle, and particularly for the efforts of Henry Hammond during the Commonwealth period, but although the return to monarchy and state Anglicanism did represent some aspects of the Circle's agenda, the generally narrow and intolerant agenda of the new order certainly did not.
  • “Against Such Hellish Mischief Fit to Oppose”: a Grotian Reading of Milton’S War in Heaven

    “Against Such Hellish Mischief Fit to Oppose”: a Grotian Reading of Milton’S War in Heaven

    Elizabeth Oldman “Against such hellish mischief fit to oppose”: A Grotian Reading of Milton’s War in Heaven y the time the latter parts of Paradise Lost came to be written,” remarks Stevie Davies, “the revolution had failed and the new tyrant, Charles II, had been restored” (45). In Paradise Lost, this essay proposes, Milton “Bcalls upon Hugo Grotius’s version of natural law to distinguish evil from good at a time when evil seemed to prevail. He attempts to make natural law perform beyond the restoration of monarchy, to ultimately prove God’s just intention in allowing the unfortunate outcome of the English Civil War to take place. Demonstrating the poet’s Grotian belief that the parameters for legitimate military action must be circumscribed in accordance with the laws of nature, two models of warfare—criminal battle originated by Satan, and God’s justifiable defensive response—take place in the War in Heaven in Book 6 of the epic. This three-day conflict fought between God’s troops and Satan’s enables Milton to investigate “what kind of rebellion was justified and what not” (Hill 366). As explanation for why the angels agree to battle, I consider how the War in Heaven ensues in a Grotian manner as a necessary instrument, for there is no other way of obliging errant nations which are uncivil to conform to reason. In response to unjust war, that is, one must wage just war. In contrast to Satan, who reveals himself as a usurper who initiates his ‘‘foreign” or international campaign for conquest and plunder of land, commendable rulership is embodied in juxtaposition with the author’s depiction of God.
  • Ulster-Scots

    Ulster-Scots

    Ulster-Scots Biographies 2 Contents 1 Introduction The ‘founding fathers’ of the Ulster-Scots Sir Hugh Montgomery (1560-1636) 2 Sir James Hamilton (1559-1644) Major landowning families The Colvilles 3 The Stewarts The Blackwoods The Montgomerys Lady Elizabeth Montgomery 4 Hugh Montgomery, 2nd Viscount Sir James Montgomery of Rosemount Lady Jean Alexander/Montgomery William Montgomery of Rosemount Notable individuals and families Patrick Montgomery 5 The Shaws The Coopers James Traill David Boyd The Ross family Bishops and ministers Robert Blair 6 Robert Cunningham Robert Echlin James Hamilton Henry Leslie John Livingstone David McGill John MacLellan 7 Researching your Ulster-Scots roots www.northdowntourism.com www.visitstrangfordlough.co.uk This publication sets out biographies of some of the part. Anyone interested in researching their roots in 3 most prominent individuals in the early Ulster-Scots the region may refer to the short guide included at story of the Ards and north Down. It is not intended to section 7. The guide is also available to download at be a comprehensive record of all those who played a northdowntourism.com and visitstrangfordlough.co.uk Contents Montgomery A2 Estate boundaries McLellan Anderson approximate. Austin Dunlop Kyle Blackwood McDowell Kyle Kennedy Hamilton Wilson McMillin Hamilton Stevenson Murray Aicken A2 Belfast Road Adams Ross Pollock Hamilton Cunningham Nesbit Reynolds Stevenson Stennors Allen Harper Bayly Kennedy HAMILTON Hamilton WatsonBangor to A21 Boyd Montgomery Frazer Gibson Moore Cunningham