DOCSLIB.ORG

College and University Rankings

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
College and University Rankings College and university rankings From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia College and university rankings are rankings of institutions in higher education ordered by various combinations of various factors. Rankings have most often been conducted by magazines, newspapers, websites, governments, or academics. In addition to ranking entire institutions, organizations perform rankings of specific programs, departments, and schools. Various rankings consider combinations of measures of wealth, research excellence and/or influence, selectivity, student options, eventual success, demographics, and other criteria. There are no known college rankings of student academic quality. Some rankings evaluate institutions within a single country, while others assess institutions worldwide. The subject has produced much debate about rankings' usefulness and accuracy. The expanding diversity in rating methodologies and accompanying criticisms of each indicate the lack of consensus in the field. Contents [hide] 1 Global rankings o 1.1 Academic Ranking of World Universities o 1.2 Center for World University Rankings o 1.3 G-factor o 1.4 Global University Ranking o 1.5 HEEACT—Ranking of Scientific Papers o 1.6 High Impact Universities: Research Performance Index o 1.7 Human Resources & Labor Review o 1.8 Leiden Ranking o 1.9 Newsweek o 1.10 Professional Ranking of World Universities o 1.11 QS World University Rankings o 1.12 QS Asian University Rankings . 1.12.1 QS Latin American University Rankings o 1.13 SCImago Institutions Rankings o 1.14 Times Higher Education World University Rankings . 1.14.1 Times Higher Education World Reputation Rankings o 1.15 U-Multirank o 1.16 University Ranking by Academic Performance o 1.17 U.S. News & World Report's Best Global Universities Rankings o 1.18 Webometrics o 1.19 Wuhan University 2 Regional and national rankings o 2.1 Asia . 2.1.1 China . 2.1.2 India . 2.1.3 Japan . 2.1.4 Pakistan . 2.1.5 Philippines . 2.1.6 South Korea o 2.2 Europe . 2.2.1 European Union . 2.2.2 Austria . 2.2.3 Bulgaria . 2.2.4 Denmark . 2.2.5 France . 2.2.6 Germany . 2.2.7 Greece . 2.2.8 Ireland . 2.2.9 Italy . 2.2.10 Macedonia . 2.2.11 Netherlands . 2.2.12 Romania . 2.2.13 Russian Federation . 2.2.14 Sweden . 2.2.15 Switzerland . 2.2.16 Ukraine . 2.2.17 United Kingdom o 2.3 North America . 2.3.1 Canada . 2.3.2 Mexico . 2.3.3 United States . 2.3.4 Money's Best Colleges . 2.3.5 Social Mobility Index (SMI) rankings o 2.4 Oceania . 2.4.1 Australia o 2.5 South America . 2.5.1 Argentina . 2.5.2 Brazil . 2.5.3 Chile 3 See also 4 Notes and references 5 External links Global rankings[edit] For rankings of United States universities in particular, see Rankings of universities in the United States. Several organizations produce worldwide university rankings, including: Academic Ranking of World Universities[edit] Main article: Academic Ranking of World Universities The Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) compiled by the Shanghai Jiao Tong University and now maintained by the Shanghai Ranking Consultancy, has provided annual global rankings of universities since 2003, making it the earliest of its kind. The ranking is funded by the Chinese government and its initial purpose was to measure the gap between Chinese and "world class" universities. 2014 Academic Ranking of World Universities, has been published; there are no Chinese Universities in the first 100 of 500 places.[1] ARWU rankings have been cited by The Economist magazine.[2] It has been lauded for being "consistent and transparent" based on an article. [3] The education ministers of France, Norway and Denmark traveled to China to discuss and find ways to improve their rankings.[4] ARWU does not rely on surveys and school submissions. Among other criteria, ARWU includes the number of articles published by Nature or Science and the number of Nobel Prize winners and Fields Medalists (mathematics).[5] Harvard has topped the ranking for years.[6] One of the primary criticisms of ARWU's methodology is that it is biased towards the natural sciences and English language science journals over other subjects.[5] Moreover, the ARWU is known for "relying solely on research indicators", and "the ranking is heavily weighted toward institutions whose faculty or alumni have won Nobel Prizes": it does not measure "the quality of teaching or the quality of humanities."[7] Center for World University Rankings[edit] This Saudi Arabia-based consulting organization has published yearly rankings of world universities since 2012. Rankings are based on quality of education, alumni employment, quality of faculty, number of publications, number of publications in high-quality journals, citations, scientific impact and number of patents.[8][9] G-factor[edit] G-factor ranks university and college web presence by counting the number of links only from other university websites, using Google search engine data. G-factor is an indicator of the popularity or importance of each university's website from the combined perspectives of other institutions. It claims to be an objective peer review of a university through its website—in social network theory terminology, G-factor measures the centrality of each university's website in the network of university websites.[10] Global University Ranking[edit] Global University Ranking measures over 400 universities using the RatER, an autonomous, non- commercial, Russian rating agency supported by Russia's academic society.[11][12] The methodology pools universities from ARWU, HEEACT, Times-QS and Webometrics and a pool of experts formed by project officials and managers to determine the rating scales for indicators in seven areas. It considers academic performance, research performance, faculty expertise, resource availability, socially significant activities of graduates, international activities, and international opinion. Each expert independently evaluates these performance indicators for candidate universities. The rating is the average of the expert evaluations.[13] This ranking raised questions when it placed RussianMoscow State University in fifth place, ahead of Harvard and Cambridge.[14] HEEACT—Ranking of Scientific Papers[edit] Main article: HEEACT – Performance Ranking of Scientific Papers for World Universities This article needs attention from an expert on the subject. Please add a reason or a talk parameter to this template to explain the issue with the article. Consider associating this request with aWikiProject. (January 2011) The Performance Ranking of Scientific Papers for World Universities was produced until 2012 by the Higher Education Evaluation and Accreditation Council of Taiwan (HEEACT).[15] The indicators were designed to measure both long-term and short-term research performance of research universities. This project employed bibliometrics to analyze and rank the performance of the 500 top universities and the top 300 universities in six fields. HEEACT further provides subject rankings in science and technology fields. It also ranked the top 300 universities across ten science and technology fields. [16] The ranking included eight indicators. They were: articles published over prior 11 years; citations of those articles, "current" articles, current citations, average citations, "H-index", number of "highly– cited papers" and high impact journal articles. They representedx three criteria of scientific papers performance: research productivity, research impact, and research excellence. The 2007 ranking methodology was alleged to have favored universities with medical schools, and in response, HEEACT added assessment criteria.[17] The six field–based rankings are based on the subject categorization of WOS, including Agriculture & Environment Sciences (AGE), Clinical Medicine (MED), Engineering, Computing & Technology (ENG), Life Sciences (LIFE), Natural Sciences (SCI) and Social Sciences (SOC). The ten subjects include Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics, Geosciences, Electrical Engineering, Computer Science, Mechanical Engineering, Chemical Engineering (including Energy & Fuels), Materials Sciences, and Civil Engineering (including Environmental Engineering).[16] High Impact Universities: Research Performance Index[edit] The High Impact Universities Research Performance Index (RPI) is a 2010 Australian initiative[18] that studies university research performance. The pilot project involved a trial of over 1,000 universities or institutions and 5,000 constituent faculties (in various disciplines) worldwide. The top 500 results for universities and faculties were reported at the project website.[18] The project promotes simplicity, transparency and fairness. The assessment analyzes research performance as measured by publications and citations. Publication and citation data is drawn from Scopus. The project uses standard bibliometric indicators, namely the 10-year g-index and h-index. RPI equally weighs contributions from the five faculties. The five faculty scores are normalized to place them onto a common scale. The normalized scores are then averaged to arrive at a final RPI. Human Resources & Labor Review[edit] The Human Resources & Labor Review (HRLR) publishes a human competitiveness index & analysis annually in Chasecareer Network (ChaseCareer.Net). This system is based on Human Resources & Labour Review Indexes (HRI and LRI), which measure the performance of top 300 universities' graduates.[19] In 2004, a couple of educational institutions voiced concerns at several events in regard to the accuracy and effectiveness of ranking bodies
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IREG Inventory of International University Rankings
    IREG Inventory of International University Rankings 2021 The purpose of IREG Observatory on Academic Ranking and Excellence is to strengthen public awareness and understanding of university rankings and their role in reflecting quality of higher education and academic excellence. from the IREG Observatory Statute IREG Observatory on Academic Ranking and Excellence (IREG stands for International Ranking Expert Group) www.ireg-observatory.org IREG Inventory of International University Rankings 2021 Brussels-Warsaw 2021 www.ireg-observatory.org/en/inventory-international-rankings The „IREG Inventory of International University Rankings” was prepared by the Perspektywy Education Foundation at the request of the IREG Observatory on Academic Ranking and Excellence whose aim is the improvement of the quality of academic rankings and quality of higher education. IREG Observatory on Academic Ranking and Excellence rue Washington 40 1050 Brussels, Belgium www.ireg-observatory.org PERSPEKTYWY Education Foundation 31 Nowogrodzka Str., 00-511 Warsaw, Poland www.perspektywy.org © IREG Observatory on Academic Ranking and Excellence This publication is based on information made available by ranking organizations. The publisher has made every effort to ensure the accuracy and completeness of the information contained in this publication, however, it takes no responsibility for any errors or omissions. The information listed is subject to change. Edited by Waldemar Siwinski, Richard Holmes, Justyna Kopanska DTP: Artur Zebrowski, Karolina Sitnicka This publication is available at www.ireg-observatory.org/en/inventory-international-rankings Warsaw 2021 ISBN: 978-83-61239-61-1 3 Executive summary IREG Observatory on Academic Ranking and Excellence initiated a project called “IREG Inventory of International University Rankings (Global and Regional)” as a part of its statutory mission.
    [Show full text]
  • The College Hopes & Worries Survey 2020
    The College Hopes & Worries Survey 2020 Findings ________________________________________________________________________ About the Survey The Princeton Review®, one of the nation's best-known education services companies, has conducted the College Hopes & Worries Survey annually since 2003. Approximately 177,000 people have participated in the survey since its inception. (See end* of this report for numbers of respondents year-over-year.) About 80% have been students applying to colleges; 20% have been parents of applicants. Survey participants have primarily been users of the company's website and readers of its annual Best Colleges book in which the survey questionnaire is published every year. The survey has 15–20 questions, the majority of which have been asked annually or for several years. The questions have multiple-choice answers with the exception of one question, "What is your 'dream' college?" that invites a fill-in-the-blank answer. The 2020 survey findings are based on responses from 12,845 people: 80% (10,276) were students applying to colleges, and 20% (2,569) were parents of applicants. Respondents completed the survey between August 2019 and early March 2020. They hailed from all 50 states and DC. The majority of respondents completed the survey online via outreaches The Princeton Review conducted. Some respondents submitted a paper version of the survey that was published in The Princeton Review book, The Best 385 Colleges / 2020 Edition (Penguin Random House, August 2019). The company awards a $2,000 college scholarship to one survey participant and a Princeton Review book to 25 other participants (all chosen at random). Participants chosen to receive a Princeton Review book were offered their choice of either The Best Value Colleges, Colleges That Create Futures, or Paying for College.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Ranking of Scientific Papers for World Universities
    Performance Ranking of Scientific Papers for World Universities Sito: http://nturanking.lis.ntu.edu.tw/ Nazione: Taiwan Il ranking viene pubblicato dalla National Taiwan University Ranking dal 2007. La classifica è basata su una serie di indicatori bibliometrici (8 raggruppati in 3 aree) ricavabili dalla banca dati Clarivate Analitics. Le aree riguardano Produttività, Impatto ed Eccellenza della ricerca scientifica, con peso rispettivamente 25%, 35%, 40%. 7 indicatori su 8 dipendono dalla dimensione degli atenei, pertanto questo ranking è molto influenzato dal fattore dimensionale. Numero Posizione Numero Posizione di Atenei di Bari di Atenei di Bari italiani tra gli in nel in Atenei Primo ateneo in Ranking Anno classifica Mondo classifica italiani Italia Performance Ranking of 2020 500 360 26 15 Padova Scientific Papers for World Universities 2019 500 374 28 15 Padova 2018 500 372 28 14 Padova CWTS Leiden Ranking Sito: https://www.leidenranking.com/ Nazione: Paesi Bassi La classifica della CWTS Leiden è un ranking internazionale basato su dati e analisi bibliometrici e curato dal Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS) della Leiden University dal 2007. Il Direzione Generale – Staff Sviluppo Organizzativo, Programmazione, Controllo e Valutazione – U.O. Statistiche di Ateneo Palazzo Ateneo P.zza Umberto I, 70121 Bari (Italia) – tel. 080-5714001 - [email protected] - www.uniba.it 1 database usato per ricavare i dati bibliometrici è quello di Clarivate Analytics (Web of Science). Al contrario di altri ranking della ricerca, ad esempio Taiwan ranking e URAP, gli indicatori prodotti da Leiden ranking non vengono aggregati per ottenere un unico valore di sintesi; per ciascuno viene presentato un ranking che considera o meno il grado di proprietà (fraction counting vs full counting).
    [Show full text]
  • College Admissions Process Can Often Be a Top Source of Stress and Anxiety for Students
    October 2018 A “FIT” OVER RANKINGS Why College Engagement Matters More Than Selectivity EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Based on the Challenge Success survey data of more than 100,000 high school students across the country, we know that the college admissions process can often be a top source of stress and anxiety for students. While many schools, counselors, and parents encourage students to focus on finding the “right fit” college, this advice can be difficult to follow without a better understanding of what “fit” means and what matters most — both for learning and engagement in college — and for life outcomes beyond college. This paper reviews and synthesizes key research in order to address many of the important questions and concerns we hear from students, parents, and schools about the college admissions process: What do college rankings really measure? Are students who attend more selective colleges better off later in life? What is “fit” and why does it matter? What the research shows: RANKINGS ARE PROBLEMATIC. Many students and families rely on college rankings published by well-known organizations to define quality. The higher the ranking, the logic goes, the better the college must be and vice versa. We find that many of the metrics used in these rankings are weighted arbitrarily and are not accurate indicators of a college’s quality or positive outcomes for students. COLLEGE SELECTIVITY IS NOT A RELIABLE PREDICTOR OF STUDENT LEARNING, JOB SATISFACTION, OR WELL-BEING. We explore the research on whether attending a selective college predicts important life outcomes and find no significant relationship between a school’s selectivity and student learning, future job satisfaction, or well-being.
    [Show full text]
  • European Journal of American Studies, 14-2 | 2019, “Summer 2019” [Online], Online Since 06 July 2019, Connection on 08 July 2021
    European journal of American studies 14-2 | 2019 Summer 2019 Electronic version URL: https://journals.openedition.org/ejas/14551 DOI: 10.4000/ejas.14551 ISSN: 1991-9336 Publisher European Association for American Studies Electronic reference European journal of American studies, 14-2 | 2019, “Summer 2019” [Online], Online since 06 July 2019, connection on 08 July 2021. URL: https://journals.openedition.org/ejas/14551; DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.4000/ejas.14551 This text was automatically generated on 8 July 2021. European Journal of American studies 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS “A More Permanent Familiarity”: Value and the Paternal Image on United States Currency Heinz Tschachler Papa’s Baby, Mama’s Maybe: Reading the Black Paternal Palimpsest and White Maternal Present Absence in Nella Larsen’s Quicksand Yolanda M. Manora “His cramped and claustrophobic brain”: Confinement and Freedom in John Wray’s Lowboy Pascale Antolin Remembering, History, and Identity: The Sculpted Life of Benjamin Franklin Mert Deniz Truth, Truth-telling and Gender in Politics: The ”Hillary” Experience C. Akça Ataç US Conservative and Libertarian Experts and Solar Geoengineering: An Assessment Jean-Daniel Collomb Close to Home, One at a Time, Not in My Backyard: Individualism and the Mantras of Depoliticization in US Reform Discourses Olga Thierbach-McLean The Conspiracist Strategy: Lessons from American Alternative Health Promotions Gad Yair Black Elitism and Cultural Entrepreneurship in 1920’s Boston, Massachusetts: The League of Women for Community Service Craig Doughty American Studies Against Itself Michael Barton European journal of American studies, 14-2 | 2019 2 “A More Permanent Familiarity”: Value and the Paternal Image on United States Currency Heinz Tschachler 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathias Risse Curriculum Vitae
    Mathias Risse Curriculum Vitae John F. Kennedy School of Government Office: (617) 495 9811 Harvard University Fax: (617) 495 4297 79 JFK St / Rubenstein 209 Cambridge, MA 02138 [email protected] USA https://www.hks.harvard.edu/about/faculty-staff-directory/mathias-risse Citizenship: German and American Employment Since 2018: Lucius N. Littauer Professor of Philosophy and Public Administration; Director of the Carr Center for Human Rights Policy; Affiliated Faculty in the Department of Philosophy 2000-2005: Assistant Professor, 2005 – 2010: Associate Professor, 2010-2018 Professor of Philosophy and Public Policy, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University 2000 - 2002: Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Department of Philosophy, Yale University Areas of Teaching and Research Areas of Specialization: Social and Political Philosophy, Ethics (Systematic, Applied) Areas of Competence: 19th Century German Philosophy, especially Nietzsche; Decision Theory (Individual and Group), Philosophy of Science (General); Logic Education 1995- 2000: Princeton University, Department of Philosophy Ph.D., Summer 2000; M.A., 1997 1990-1995: University of Bielefeld (Germany), Departments of Philosophy and Mathematics and Institute for Mathematical Economics M.S. (Diplom), 1996, Mathematics, supervisor Robert Aumann, Hebrew University; exam areas probability/measure theory, game theory, logic, algebraic topology; grade sehr gut (very good) B.S. (Vordiplom), 1992, Mathematics and Mathematical Economics, grade sehr gut B.A. (Zwischenprüfung),
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing the Activities of Visitors of the Leiden Ranking Website
    STI 2018 Conference Proceedings Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators All papers published in this conference proceedings have been peer reviewed through a peer review process administered by the proceedings Editors. Reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a conference proceedings. Chair of the Conference Paul Wouters Scientific Editors Rodrigo Costas Thomas Franssen Alfredo Yegros-Yegros Layout Andrea Reyes Elizondo Suze van der Luijt-Jansen The articles of this collection can be accessed at https://hdl.handle.net/1887/64521 ISBN: 978-90-9031204-0 © of the text: the authors © 2018 Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University, The Netherlands This ARTICLE is licensed under a Creative Commons Atribution-NonCommercial-NonDetivates 4.0 International Licensed Analyzing the activities of visitors of the Leiden Ranking website Nees Jan van Eck and Ludo Waltman [email protected]; [email protected] Centre for Science and Technology Studies, Leiden University, PO box 905, 2300 AX Leiden (The Netherlands) Introduction In the scientometric literature, university rankings are discussed primarily from a methodological point of view (e.g., Waltman et al., 2012). In this paper, we take a different perspective. In our view, constructing a high-quality university ranking requires not only an advanced understanding of methodological issues but also a sufficient level of knowledge of the way in which university rankings are used. The use of university rankings has been studied using questionnaires and interviews (e.g., Hazelkorn, 2015). We take an alternative approach by analyzing the activities of visitors of a university ranking website.
    [Show full text]
  • Committed to Internship, Co-Op, & Career Education
    Committed to Internship, Co-op, & Career Education endicott.edu The Endicott Internship | 1 Endicott students CAREER READY FROM DAY ONE achieve so much through Endicott College graduates boast a degree in one hand their three-internship and an impressive resume in the other. sequence—not only are The Internship & Career Center at Endicott is a resource to help students they able to connect understand the relationship between academic experiences, internship classroom learning to opportunities, and career choices. We provide individual career advising, “the professional world, training seminars, employer events, on campus recruiting, an alumni mentor program, and career assessments to help students and alumni prepare for and vice versa, but they their future. also develop professional competencies and THE networks that propel them NATIONAL U.S. NEWS into successful careers." SOCIETY FOR PRINCETON & WORLD EXPERIENTIAL REVIEW Dale McLennan, REPORT EDUCATION Dean Internship & Career Center Best Colleges 2021 Endicott College is the recipient The Princeton Review has of the 2020 Outstanding selected Endicott College for Endicott College was ranked Experiential Education Program inclusion in their Guide to No. 23 out of 176 Northern of the Year Award. Green Colleges: 2021 Edition Regional Universities. Included among: • Best Colleges for Veterans • Best Value Schools • A+ Schools for B Students • Best Undergraduate Teaching • Most Students in THE 2020 Great Colleges University Housing CHRONICLE to Work For OF HIGHER Endicott College received honors Best Colleges 2021 in five of the 12 categories and No. 15 for Internships/Co-Ops EDUCATION was again named to the Honor Nationally Roll for the eleventh time. 2 | The Endicott Internship OUR TIME-TESTED MODEL How the Program Works Pre-Internship Sessions Instruction provided first Short-Term Internship semester during year one prepares students to search and complete their first and Winter or Summer Intersession second internships.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Necessity of Multiple University Rankings
    COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management ISSN : 0973 – 7766 (Print) 2168 – 930X (Online) DOI : 10.1080/09737766.2018.1550043 On the necessity of multiple university rankings Lefteris Angelis Nick Bassiliades Yannis Manolopoulos Nowadays university rankings are ubiquitous commodities; a plethora of them is published every year by private enterprises, state authorities and universities. University rankings are very popular to governments, journalists, university administrations and families as well. At the same time, they are heavily criticized as being very subjective and contradic- tory to each other. University rankings have been studied with respect to political, educational and data management aspects. In this paper, we Lefteris Angelis* focus on a specific research question regarding the alignment of some School of Informatics well-known such rankings, ultimately targeting to investigate the use- Aristotle University of fulness of the variety of all these rankings. First, we describe in detail Thessaloniki the methodology to collect and homogenize the data and, second, we Thessaloniki 54124 statistically analyze these data to examine the correlation among the dif- Greece ferent rankings. The results show that despite their statistically signifi- [email protected] cant correlation, there are many cases of high divergence and instability, which can be reduced by ordered categorization. Our conclusion is that Nick Bassiliades if, in principle, someone accepts the reliability of university rankings, School of Informatics the necessity and the usefulness, of all of them is questionable since Aristotle University of only few of them could be sufficient representatives of the whole set. Thessaloniki The overabundance of university rankings is especially conspicuous for Thessaloniki 54124 the top universities.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. University Success
    2015 in partnership with Your first step to U.S. university success 02 Welcome to ONCAMPUS TEXAS 04 The University of North Texas ONCAMPUS TEXAS 06 Everything’s bigger in Texas is your pathway to accomplishment 08 The perfect campus 10 University Transfer Program ONCAMPUS Texas, located at the University of North Texas 12 Progression to UNT (UNT), is specially designed to provide you with skills for success - academically, socially and professionally. As a full ON 14 Why choose CAMPUS TEXAS time student, you will earn college credit towards your future 16 Academic Entry Requirements degree while also gaining a deeper understanding of Texas, the U.S. and its education system. 18 Program Details UNT is a large public, student-centered research university located in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex. It is committed to advancing educational excellence and preparing students to become thoughtful, engaged citizens of the world. Founded in 1890 it is now the 25th largest university in the U.S. enrolling 36,000 students across 99 bachelors, 83 masters and 36 doctoral degree programs. ONCAMPUS Texas provides you with the tools needed to successfully start, and succeed, in your chosen degree program. ONCAMPUS TEXAS is proud to work in partnership with University of North Texas to offer a high- quality university transfer program for international students on a Eva I Turkey I MS I Radio and Television university campus. “My learning about the U.S. went far beyond the one class[room] at UNT, I want to work for the United Nations and contribute to Find out more: education and peace in any way that I can.” www.oncampususa.com/texas Facebook: www.facebook.com/oncampustexas Named Outstanding Foreign Student in North Texas for 2014 Preparation for your future WHY STUDY IN THE U.S.? • ONCAMPUS Texas helps international students succeed – academically, socially, and professionally Choices – no other country comes close to offering as many – with a one-year support program delivered at the learning options University of North Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association
    January 2008 Volume 81, Issue 3 Proceedings and Addresses of The American Philosophical Association apa The AmericAn PhilosoPhicAl Association Pacific Division Program University of Delaware Newark, DE 19716 www.apaonline.org The American Philosophical Association Pacific Division Eighty-Second Annual Meeting Hilton Pasadena Pasadena, CA March 18 - 23, 2008 Proceedings and Addresses of The American Philosophical Association Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association (ISSN 0065-972X) is published five times each year and is distributed to members of the APA as a benefit of membership and to libraries, departments, and institutions for $75 per year. It is published by The American Philosophical Association, 31 Amstel Ave., University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716. Periodicals Postage Paid at Newark, DE and additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Proceedings and Addresses, The American Philosophical Association, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716. Editor: David E. Schrader Phone: (302) 831-1112 Publications Coordinator: Erin Shepherd Fax: (302) 831-8690 Associate Editor: Anita Silvers Web: www.apaonline.org Meeting Coordinator: Linda Smallbrook Proceedings and Addresses of The American Philosophical Association, the major publication of The American Philosophical Association, is published five times each academic year in the months of September, November, January, February, and May. Each annual volume contains the programs for the meetings of the three Divisions; the membership list; Presidential Addresses; news of the Association, its Divisions and Committees, and announcements of interest to philosophers. Other items of interest to the community of philosophers may be included by decision of the Editor or the APA Board of Officers. Microfilm copies are available through National Archive Publishing Company, Periodicals/Acquisitions Dept., P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Princeton Review
    4/3/14 Common Data Set A: General Information Common Data Set A: General Information (2013-2014) Instructions and Help Glossary of Terms Respondent Information (Not for Publication) A0 Name: Jane Kimble Title: Assistant Director of Institutional Research Office: Office of Institutional Research Mailing Address: Middlebury College Forest 132 City/State/Zip: Middlebury VT 05753 Country: United States Phone: 802-443-5351 Fax: Email Address [email protected] Are your responses to the CDS posted for references on your institution's Yes No Web site? If yes, please provide the URL of the corresponding Web page: http://www.middlebury.edu/offices/administration/planning/mdata/history/cds We invite you to indicate if there are items on the CDS for which you cannot use the requested analytic convention, or cannot provide data for the cohort requested, whose methodology is unclear, or about which you have questions or comments in general. This information will not be published but will help the publishers further refine CDS items. Address Information A1 Name of College/University: Middlebury College Mailing Address: City/State/Zip: Middlebury VT 05753 Country: United States Street Address (if different): Main Phone Number: (802)443-5000 WWW Home Page Address: www.middlebury.edu Admissions Phone Number 802-443-3000 Admissions Toll-Free Phone Number: Admissions Office Mailing Address: The Emma Willard House https://survey.review.com/ss/wsb.dll/5/CommonDataSetA.htm?paction=resume&index=0 1/3 4/3/14 Common Data Set A: General Information Admissions
    [Show full text]