DOCSLIB.ORG

Selected Research and Development Papers Presented at the Annual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

thannual Proceedings Selected Research and Development Papers Presented at The Annual Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology - Volume 1 Sponsored by the Research and Theory Division And The Division of Instructional Design 37 Jacksonville, FL Editor: Michael Simonson Nova Southeastern University, North Miami Beach, Florida 2014 Annual Proceedings - Jacksonville: Volumes 1 & 2 Volume 1: Selected Research and Development Papers And Volume 2: Selected Papers On the Practice of Educational Communications and Technology Presented at The Annual Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology Sponsored by the Research and Theory Division And The Division of Instructional Design Jacksonville, FL 2014 Editor Michael Simonson Professor Instructional Technology and Distance Education Nova Southeastern University Fischler School of Education and Human Services North Miami Beach, FL Preface Since 1979, the Research and Division of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT) has sponsored or co-sponsored the publication of these Proceedings. Papers published in this year's 37th Annual Proceedings were presented at the 2014 AECT Convention in Jacksonville, FL.A limited quantity of these Proceedings were printed and sold in both hardcopy and electronic versions. Volumes 1 and 2 are available through the Educational Resources Clearinghouse (ERIC) System. Proceedings volumes are available to members at AECT.ORG. The Proceedings of AECT’s Convention are published in two volumes. Volume #1 contains papers dealing primarily with research and development topics. Papers dealing with the practice of instructional technology including instruction and training issues are contained in Volume #2. This year, both volumes are included in one document. REFEREEING PROCESS: Papers selected for presentation at the AECT Convention and included in these Proceedings were subjected to a reviewing process. All references to authorship were removed from proposals before they were submitted to referees for review. Approximately sixty percent of the manuscripts submitted for consideration were selected for presentation at the convention and for publication in these Proceedings. The papers contained in this document represent some of the most current thinking in educational communications and technology. Michael R. Simonson Editor ii 2014 AECT Conference RTD Reviewers Tonya Amankwatia Krista Glazewski Al P. Mizell Gerald Burgess Michael Grant Gary Morrison M. J. Bishop Janette Hill Zane Olina Marcie Bober Brad Hokansen Gamze Ogozul Jonathan Brinkerhoff Ann Igoe Andrea Peach Abbie Brown Kethleeen Ingram Robert Reiser Shirley Campbell Paul Kirschner Willi Savenye Susan Colaric James Klein Rebecca Scheckler Marcy Driscoll Dave Knowlton Michael Simonson Jared Danielson Theodore Kopcha Andrew Smith Peg Ertmer Tiffany Koszalka Michael Spector Deniz Eseryl Kathryn Ley Howard Sullivan Branda Friedan Nancy Maushak Ellen Taricani Xun Ge Trey Martindale Lucinda Willis Andrew Gibbons Joan Mazur iii Previous Proceedings Published in ERIC Year Location ED Number 1979 New Orleans 171329 1980 Denver 194061 1981 Philadelphia 207487 1982 Dallas 223191 – 223326 1983 New Orleans 231337 1984 Dallas 243411 1985 Anaheim 256301 1986 Las Vegas 267753 1987 Atlanta 285518 1988 New Orleans 295621 1989 Dallas 308805 1990 Anaheim 323912 1991 Orlando 334969 1992 Washington, D.C. 347970 – 348041 1993 New Orleans 362144 1994 Nashville 373774 1995 Anaheim 383284 1996 Indianapolis 397772 1997 Albuquerque 409832 1998 St. Louis 423819 1999 Houston 436128 1999 Long Beach 444595 2000 Denver 455756 2001 Atlanta 470066 2002 Dallas 496300 2003 Anaheim 496305 & 496303 2004 Chicago 499961 & 499962 2005 Orlando 499958 & 499963 2006 Dallas 499964 & 499959 2007 Anaheim 499889 & 499896 2008 Orlando 504371 2009 Louisville 511355 & 511356 2011 Anaheim 514646 & 514647 2012 Louisville 546875 & 546876 2013 Anaheim 546877 & 546878 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 - SELECTED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PAPERS INFORMATION VISUALIZATION IN STUDENTS EYE: AN EYE TRACKING STUDY OF RISING SEA LEVELS .........................................................................................................1 Dalia Alyahya, Suzan Alyahya INTERACTIVE EBOOKS AS A TOOL OF MOBILE LEARNING FOR DIGITAL-NATIVES IN HIGHER EDUCATION: INTERACTIVITY, PREFERENCES AND OWNERSHIP .....................................................................................................7 Aadil Askar RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING OCCURRING IN ONLINE INFORMAL AND NON-FORMAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS: THE CASE OF HIGHER EDUCATION IN TURKEY....................................................................................................................14 Mesut Aydemir OPEN DIALOGUE: A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF THE #OPENEDUCATION TWITTER HASHTAG ...........................................................................................................................20 Fredrick W. Baker ENHANCING ONLINE COURSES WITH DIGITAL STORYTELLING ......................................30 Sally Baldwin, Yu-Hui Ching VISUALIZING LEARNING FOR THE NEXT GENERATION: VISUAL AND MEDIA LITERACY RESEARCH, 2000-2014 .....................................................................................37 Danilo M. Baylen, Kendal Lucas EXAMINING THE ROLE OF EMOTION IN PUBLIC HEALTH EDUCATION USING MULTIMEDIA...........................................................................................................................48 Sungwon Chung, Kwangwoo Lee, Jongpil Cheon STUDENTS’ ONLINE LEARNING EXPERIENCES IN COLLECTIVIST CULTURES ..............................................................................................................................................53 Ana-Paula Correia EMPHASIS ON STANDARDS: WHAT DO THE INTERNS REPORT? .......................................59 Lana Kaye B. Dotson A COMPARISON OF LEARNER SELF-REGULATION IN ONLINE AND FACE- TO-FACE PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING COURSES ...................................................................63 Christopher Andrew Glenn v EXPLORING THE INFLUENCE OF ACADEMIC TECHNOLOGY PROFESSIONALS IN HIGHER EDUCATION ..................................................................................75 Stephanie Glick EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES WORKING IN TODAY’S CLASSROOMS: TECH TOOLS AND APPS FOR TEACHING IN THE REAL WORLD .........................................84 V. Paige Hale MODELING THE PROCESSES OF DIAGRAMMING ARGUMENTS THAT SUPPORT AND INHIBIT STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING OF COMPLEX ARGUMENTS..........................................................................................................................................87 Allan Jeong, Haeyoung Kim A REVIEW OF RESEARCH ON COLLABORATION VIA BLOGS IN ONLINE LEARNING ..............................................................................................................................................96 Habibah Khan, Trey Martindale COMPETENCY OF TEACHERS IN USING TECHNOLOGY BASED ON ISTE NETS.T IN TATWEER SCHOOLS- SAUDI ARABIA .....................................................................104 Abdulrahman A Kamal MIDDLE SCHOOL TEACHERS’ PERSPECTIVE: THE BENEFITS, CHALLENGES, AND SUGGESTION WHEN USING THE IPAD ................................................109 Jeungah Kim CONCEPT CENTRALITY: A USEFUL AND USABLE ANALYSIS METHOD TO REVEAL MENTAL REPRESENTATION OF BILINGUAL READERS ......................................117 Kyung Kim, Roy B. Clariana ADOLESCENTS’ INTERNET USE AND USAGE IN A FAMILY CONTEXT: IMPLICATIONS FOR FAMILY LEARNING ..................................................................................125 Wilfred W. F. Lau, Allan H. K. Yuen LEVERAGING TECHNOLOGY: FACILITATING PRESERVICE TEACHERS TPACK THROUGH VIDEO SELF ANALYSIS ...............................................................................133 James E. Jang, Jing Lei USE OF THE FLIPPED INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL IN HIGHER EDUCATION: INSTRUCTORS’ PERSPECTIVES ....................................................................................................142 Taotao Long, John Cummins, Michael Waugh EVALUATION OF THE “LET'S TALK: FINDING RELIABLE MENTAL HEALTH INFORMATION AND RESOURCES” PILOT PROGRAM FOR GRADES 7 AND 8 STUDENTS IN THREE ONTARIAN SCHOOL BOARDS AND ONE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL IN QUEBEC .................................................................................152 Cameron Montgomery, Natalie Montgomery, Christine Potra vi TOUCHING OUR WAY TO BETTER CONVERSATIONS: HOW TABLETS IMPACT COGNITIVE LOAD AND COLLABORATIVE LEARNING DISCOURSES .................................................................................................................159 Christopher Ostrowski THE EFFECT OF SELF-ASSESSMENT ON ACHIEVEMENT IN AN ONLINE COURSE ................................................................................................................................168 Yasin Özarslan, Ozlem Ozan PERCEPTIONS OF THE ROLE AND VALUE OF INTERACTIVE VIDEOCONFERENCING AND CHAT ROOMS IN SUPPORTING GOALS OF CROSS-CULTURAL UNDERSTANDING AMONG THREE EDUCATIONAL NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS ......................................................................................................172 Shilpa Sahay, Pavlo Antonenko PRE-SERVICE ENGLISH TEACHERS’ ACHIEVEMENT GOAL ORIENTATIONS: A STUDY OF A DISTANCE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHER EDUCATION PROGRAM ..............................................................................................181 Hasan Uçar, Müjgan Bozkaya PERCEPTIONS OF ONLINE PROGRAM GRADUATES:
Recommended publications
  • Network Science

    Network Science

    This is a preprint of Katy Börner, Soma Sanyal and Alessandro Vespignani (2007) Network Science. In Blaise Cronin (Ed) Annual Review of Information Science & Technology, Volume 41. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc./American Society for Information Science and Technology, chapter 12, pp. 537-607. Network Science Katy Börner School of Library and Information Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA [email protected] Soma Sanyal School of Library and Information Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA [email protected] Alessandro Vespignani School of Informatics, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47406, USA [email protected] 1. Introduction.............................................................................................................................................2 2. Notions and Notations.............................................................................................................................4 2.1 Graphs and Subgraphs .........................................................................................................................5 2.2 Graph Connectivity..............................................................................................................................7 3. Network Sampling ..................................................................................................................................9 4. Network Measurements........................................................................................................................11
  • Vic Mignogna: Allegations and Supporting Or Relevant Information to Those Allegations * ​

    Vic Mignogna: Allegations and Supporting Or Relevant Information to Those Allegations * ​

    Vic Mignogna: Allegations and Supporting or Relevant Information to Those Allegations * ​ * recent updates in red Table of Contents 1. Allegation of Sexual Advances on a Student and Minor (1989) ​ ​ 2. Allegation of Job Termination Due to Sexually Inappropriate Behavior with Students (1987) ​ ​ 3. Allegation of Sexually Inappropriate Behavior with Cosplayer Jessie Pridemore (c. 2009) ​ ​ 4. Voice Actors or Industry Professionals Who Allege to Having Personally Experienced Harassment or Sexually ​ ​ ​ Inappropriate Behavior from Vic Mignogna 5. Voice Actors or Industry Professionals Who Allege to Having Personally Witnessed Harassment or Sexually ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Inappropriate Behavior from Vic Mignogna 6. Voice Actors or Industry Professionals Who Allege to Having Personally Witnessed Rude Behavior Toward ​ ​ ​ Convention Staffers or Colleagues from Vic Mignogna 7. Voice Actors or Industry Professionals Who Support #KickVic or Believe the Accusations ​ 8. A Statement from Vic Mignogna’s Ex-Fiancee, Actor and Voice Actor Michele Specht ​ ​ 9. Private Individuals Who Allege to Having Personally Experienced Harassment or Sexually Inappropriate ​ ​ ​ Behavior from Vic Mignogna 10. Private Individuals Who Allege to Having Personally Witnessed Harassment or Sexually Inappropriate Behavior ​ ​ ​ from Vic Mignogna 11. Private Individuals Who Allege to Having Personally Witnessed Rude Behavior Toward Convention Staffers, ​ ​ ​ Colleagues, or Fans from Vic Mignogna 12. Industry Professionals or Private Individuals Who Allege That Vic Mignogna Was Banned or Removed from ​ Specific Conventions for Sexually Inappropriate Behavior or Rude Behavior Toward Convention Staffers ​ 13. Voice Actors or Industry Professionals Who Allege that Vic Mignogna Was Previously Cautioned or Warned ​ About His Sexually Inappropriate Behavior 14. Industry Professionals or Private Individuals Who Allege to Having Personally Witnessed Homophobic Behavior ​ or Evidence of Homophobia at Conventions from Vic Mignogna 15.
  • A Comparison of Self-Organizing Maps and Pathfinder Networks for the Mapping of Co-Cited Authors Jan William Buzydlowski Howard D

    A Comparison of Self-Organizing Maps and Pathfinder Networks for the Mapping of Co-Cited Authors Jan William Buzydlowski Howard D

    A Comparison of Self-Organizing Maps and Pathfinder Networks for the Mapping of Co-Cited Authors A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Drexel University by Jan William Buzydlowski in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2002 © Copyright 2003 Jan William Buzydlowski. All Rights Reserved ii Dedications To my father. iii Acknowledgements Howard D. White, PhD, thesis advisor, who never treated me as a student, but from whom I learned more than any other teacher. The distinguished members of my committee: · Xia Lin, PhD, who treated me as a colleague and friend. · Katherine W. McCain, PhD, who always knew what to do. · Richard Heiberger, PhD, who showed me fascinating new worlds. · Stephen Kimbrough, PhD, for his invaluable contribution. J. Jeffery Hand, Linda Marion, Joan Lussky for their camaraderie. All of the experts involved with this study who were more than generous with their time and expertise. Cheryl L. Berringer for her emotional support, without which none of this would have been possible. iv Table of Contents List of Tables ......................................................................................................... vii List of Figures ........................................................................................................viii Abstract ....................................................................................................................x 1. INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT OF PROBLEM ...................................1 1.1. Goal of the Research.............................................................................1
  • Cognitively Plausible Information Visualization

    Cognitively Plausible Information Visualization

    Exploring Geovisualization J. Dykes, A.M. MacEachren, M.-J. Kraak (Editors) q 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Chapter 35 Cognitively Plausible Information Visualization Sara Irina Fabrikant, Department of Geography, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA Andre´ Skupin, Department of Geography, University of New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70148, USA Keywords: Information Visualization, spatialization, Cartography, spatial cognition, human–computer interaction Abstract Information Visualization is concerned with the art and technology of designing and implementing highly interactive, computer supported tools for knowledge discovery in large non-spatial databases. Information Visualization displays, also known as information spaces or graphic spatializations, differ from ordinary data visualization and geovisualization in that they may be explored as if they represented spatial information. Information spaces are very often based on spatial metaphors such as location, distance, region, scale, etc., thus potentially affording spatial analysis techniques and geovisualization approaches for data exploration and knowledge discovery. Two major concerns in spatialization can be identified from a GIScience/ geovisualization perspective: the use of space as a data generalization strategy, and the use of spatial representations or maps to depict these data abstractions. A range of theoretical and technical research questions needs to be addressed to assure the construction of cognitively adequate spatializations. In the first part of this chapter we propose a framework for the construction of cognitively plausible semantic information spaces. This theoretical scaffold is based on geographic information theory and includes principles of ontological modeling such as semantic generalization (spatial primitives), geometric generalization (visual variables), association (source–target domain mapping through spatial metaphors), and aggregation (hierarchical organization).
  • Visual Analytics of Dynamic Networks

    Visual Analytics of Dynamic Networks

    Visual Analytics of Dynamic Networks Paolo Federico Dissertation Faculty of Informatics, TU Wien, May 31, 2017 Visual Analytics of Dynamic Networks DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doktor/in der technischen Wissenschaften by Paolo Federico Registration Number 0928613 to the Faculty of Informatics at the Vienna University of Technology Advisor: Univ.Prof.in Dr.in rer.soc.oec. Silvia Miksch The dissertation has been reviewed by: (Ao.Univ.Prof.in Dr.in phil. (Univ.Prof. Dr.rer.nat. Margit Pohl) Dr.techn.h.c. Dr.-Ing.E.h. Thomas Ertl) Wien, 25.04.2017 (Paolo Federico) Technische Universität Wien A-1040 Wien ⇧ Karlsplatz 13 ⇧ Tel. +43-1-58801-0 ⇧ www.tuwien.ac.at Acknowledgements I would like to thank my advisor Silvia Miksch for supporting me during the course of my doc- toral study with scientific rigour, friendly communication, and relentless enthusiasm into visual analytic research. Thanks to her and to all my present and past colleagues in the ieg/CVAST group, I could work on my research in an enjoyable, inspiring, and supportive work environ- ment. In addition, I would like to thank the researchers who collaborated to the projects in whose context I conducted my PhD, namely Wolfgang Aigner, Albert Amor-Amorós, Jürgen Pfeffer, Michael Smuc, Florian Windhager, and Lukas Zenk. Special thanks go to Wolfgang Aigner who provided fruitful suggestions and feedback in the first phases of my PhD. Christian Bors and Markus Bögl helped me with the German abstract. The research leading to this thesis has received funding from the Austrian Research Pro- motion Agency (FFG) through ViENA (Visual Enteprise Network Analytics, project number 820928) and Expand (EXploratory visualization of PAtent Network Dynamics, project number 835937) as well as from the Austrian Federal Ministry of Science, Research, and Economy (for- merly known as Austrian Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth) through the Laura Bassi Centre for Visual Analytics Science and Technology (CVAST), project number: 822746 (Phase 1).
  • Anime Fan Culture As Narrative in North American Media

    Anime Fan Culture As Narrative in North American Media

    The Fan-Oriented Work: Anime Fan Culture as Narrative in North American Media Victoria Berndt A Thesis in The Mel Hoppenheim School of Cinema Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts (Film Studies) at Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada January 2021 ©Victoria Berndt, 2021 CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY School of Graduate Studies This is to certify that this thesis prepared By: Victoria Berndt Entitled: The Fan-Oriented Work: Anime Fan Culture as Narrative in North American Media and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Arts (Film Studies) complies with the regulations of the University and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality. Signed by the final Examining Committee: Chair Examiner Dr. Sandra Annett Examiner Dr. Joshua Neves Supervisor Dr. Marc Steinberg Approved by: Dr. Marc Steinberg, Graduate Program Director 2021 Annie Gérin, Dean of Faculty iii ABSTRACT The Fan-Oriented Work: Anime Fan Culture as Narrative in North American Media Victoria Berndt Japanese animation, popularly referred to as ‘anime’, has recently experienced a shift in North American consumer contexts from its initial scarcity in overseas markets to its overwhelming presence online and in physical spaces. With streaming services such as Crunchyroll (an anime-specific streaming service) and Netflix’s selection of anime increasing its availability outside of Japan over the past decade, North American viewers are now able to interact with anime through heavily connected digital landscapes (Annett 6). As a result of this globalized viewership, an emergent subgenre of anime has formed, which I term “anime fan- oriented works.” In such works, North American anime fans become the target audience of North American-created material catering to anime fan cultures and experiences.
  • No Brand Con 2018 Program Guide

    No Brand Con 2018 Program Guide

    1 Table of Contents Welcome 04 Convention Rules 06 Guests 09 Artist Alley 18 Vendor Room 20 Merchandise 22 Schedule 24 Main Events 30 Panels 34 No Mercy Room 40 Anime Room 44 Video Game Room 48 Tabletop Gaming Room 50 Puzzle Hunt 52 Food Near the Chula Vista 54 FAQs 55 Convention Maps 56 Registration Table Friday: 10am - 9pm Saturday: 9am - 9pm Sunday: 9am - 1pm For off-hour registration, lost badges, or questions regarding registration, you can visit the Staff Room (Sierra Vista). Location is on our floor map in the back of this book. Special thanks to Cassafrass (fb.com/CassafrassCosplay) for our amazing Cover Art! 3 Welcome to No Brand Con 2018 Letter From The Directors! Hello and welcome to No Brand Con 17! Not only is it our 17th consecutive year, but our third here at the Chula Vista Resort. We have worked tirelessly to ensure this year will be our best yet- but we couldn’t have done it alone! We have an amazing staff to thank that has put in countless hours, fantastic hotel staff to help us out, our most gracious spon- sors, and let’s not forget the most important people of all- YOU! From our fans who have been here from the beginning to those of you joining us for the first time and everyone in between, thank you for supporting No Brand Con through the years. This year we are fortunate enough to welcome back staff that have been with No Brand since day one, and we couldn’t be more excited to merge the old and the new.
  • As Viewed Through the Pages of the New York Times in 2012 & 2013

    As Viewed Through the Pages of the New York Times in 2012 & 2013

    THE KOREAN THE KOREAN WAVE AS VIEWED THROUGHWAVE THE PAGES OF THE NEW YORK TIMES IN 2012 & 2013 THE KOREAN WAVE AS As Viewed Through the Pages of The New York Times in 2012 & 2013 THE KOREAN THE KOREAN WAVE AS VIEWED THROUGH THE PAGES OF THE NEW YORK TIMES IN 2012 & 2013 THE KOREAN WTHE KOREAN WAVE AS VIEWED THROUGHWAVE THE PAGES OF THE NEW YORK TIMES IN 2012 & 2013 THE KOREAN WAVE AS As Viewed Through the Pages of The New York Times in 2012 & 2013 This booklet is a collection of 44 articles selected by Korean Cultural Service New York from articles on Korean culture by The New York Times in 2012 & 2013. THE KOREAN THE KOREAN WAVE AS VIEWED THROUGHWAVE THE PAGES OF THE NEW YORK TIMES IN 2012 & 2013 THE KOREAN WAVE AS As Viewed Through the Pages of The New York Times First edition, December 2013 in 2012 & 2013 Edited & Published by Korean Cultural Service New York 460 Park Avenue, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10022 Tel: 212 759 9550 Fax: 212 688 8640 Website: http://www.koreanculture.org E-mail: [email protected] Copyright © 2013 by Korean Cultural Service New York All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recovering, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. From The New York Times, 2012 – 2013© 2012 – 2013 The New York Times. All rights reserved. Used by permission and protected by the Copyright Laws of the United States.
  • FINDING PATHS OR GETTING LOST? – Examining the Mental Model Construct and Mental Model Methodology

    FINDING PATHS OR GETTING LOST? – Examining the Mental Model Construct and Mental Model Methodology

    Linköping University | Department of Computer Science Master’s thesis, 30 credits | Cognitive Science Spring 2017 | ISRN LIU-IDA/KOGVET-A--17/009--SE FINDING PATHS OR GETTING LOST? – Examining the mental model construct and mental model methodology Jimmy Hammarbäck Supervisor: Rita Kovordányi External supervisor: Jonas Hallberg Examiner: Arne Jönsson Linköping University SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden +46 013 28 10 00, www.liu.se Upphovsrätt Detta dokument hålls tillgängligt på Internet – eller dess framtida ersättare – under 25 år från publiceringsdatum under förutsättning att inga extraordinära omständigheter uppstår. Tillgång till dokumentet innebär tillstånd för var och en att läsa, ladda ner, skriva ut enstaka kopior för enskilt bruk och att använda det oförändrat för ickekommersiell forskning och för undervisning. Överföring av upphovsrätten vid en senare tidpunkt kan inte upphäva detta tillstånd. All annan användning av dokumentet kräver upphovsmannens medgivande. För att garantera äktheten, säkerheten och tillgängligheten finns lösningar av teknisk och administrativ art. Upphovsmannens ideella rätt innefattar rätt att bli nämnd som upphovsman i den omfattning som god sed kräver vid användning av dokumentet på ovan beskrivna sätt samt skydd mot att dokumentet ändras eller presenteras i sådan form eller i sådant sammanhang som är kränkande för upphovsmannens litterära eller konstnärliga anseende eller egenart. För ytterligare information om Linköping University Electronic Press se förlagets hemsida http://www.ep.liu.se/. Copyright The publishers will keep this document online on the Internet – or its possible replacement – for a period of 25 years starting from the date of publication barring exceptional circumstances. The online availability of the document implies permanent permission for anyone to read, to download, or to print out single copies for his/hers own use and to use it unchanged for non- commercial research and educational purpose.
  • Visualizing Knowledge Domains1

    Visualizing Knowledge Domains1

    This is a preprint of Katy Börner, Chaomei Chen, & Kevin Boyack: Visualizing Knowledge Domains. In Blaise Cronin (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science & Technology, Volume 37, 1 Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc./American Visualizing Knowledge Domains Society for Information Science and Technology, chapter 5, pp. 179-255, 2003. Katy Börner School of Library and Information Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA [email protected] Chaomei Chen College of Information Science and Technology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA [email protected] Kevin W. Boyack Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185, USA [email protected] "The purpose of computing is insight – not numbers." R. W. Hamming (1962) 1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................................................2 2 HISTORY.............................................................................................................................................................4 2.1 SCIENTOMETRICS, BIBLIOMETRICS, AND CITATION ANALYSIS ......................................................................4 2.2 MAP GENERATION AND VISUALIZATION ........................................................................................................7 3 PROCESS FLOW OF VISUALIZING KNOWLEDGE DOMAINS .............................................................8 3.1 UNITS OF ANALYSIS .....................................................................................................................................10