DOCSLIB.ORG

Leeds Site Allocations Plan on Behalf of Network Space

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Leeds Site Allocations Plan on Behalf of Network Space Hearing Statement – Matter 7 Leeds Site Allocations Plan On behalf of Network Space August 2017 Hearing Statement: Matter 7 – Leeds SAP Network Space, August 2017 1. Introduction 1.1. This is a Hearing Statement prepared by Spawforths on behalf of Network Space in respect of: • Matter 7: Selection of sites allocated for development 1.2. Network Space has significant land interests in the area and has made representations to earlier stages of the emerging Site Allocations Plan and is specifically interested in securing an employment allocation for their land at Warren Farm, Micklefield (Site 1269). 1.3. The Inspector’s Issues and Questions are included in bold for ease of reference. The following responses should be read in conjunction with Network Space’s comments upon the previous version of the Leeds Site Allocations Plan, dated September 2015 and March 2017. 1.4. Network Space has also expressed a desire to attend and participate in Matter 7 of the Examination in Public. 2 Hearing Statement: Matter 7 – Leeds SAP Network Space, August 2017 2. Matter 6 – Selection of sites allocated for development 2.1. In addition to the general matters raised by Network Space in respect of Matter 2, the following individual sites are not considered “sound”: • over 17ha of land in Garforth (Sites EG1-35 and EG1-36) which has significant ground condition issues, is constrained by the now safeguarded route of HS2 and the landowner is seeking residential uses on the site; • 36.23ha of land at Leeds Bradford Airport (Site EG3) which is part of the long term plans for the airport; • 5 hectares of employment land at the proposed new settlement at Parlington (MX2- 39) which is the subject of major objection; and • 17.51ha at Thorp Arch Trading Estate which is the subject of a residential planning application. 2.2. These are now considered in more detail. Sites EG1-35 and EG1-36 (Hawks Park North) 2.3. Network Space objected to the identification of these employment sites within the Site Allocation Plan. These sites form part of an existing UDPR employment allocation (E4:13) that has not come forward. Network Space is encouraged that these sites have been reduced to take into account some aspects of HS2 but do not consider that these changes are sufficient given the technical constraints to delivery, HS2 implications and the landowners own aspirations for the site. 2.4. In accordance with the Framework existing UDPR allocations “should be regularly reviewed” and should not be identified for employment use “where there is no reasonable prospect of a site being used for that purpose” (para 22). Whilst the area of land affected by HS2 has been removed from these allocations, the potential for additional land to be sterilized and the impact on viability or deliverability of the land to the north of HS2 which is landlocked between the HS2 railway and the M1 Motorway has not been taken into account. The affect being that following implementation of HS2 there is only feasibly circa 11ha of land that 3 Hearing Statement: Matter 7 – Leeds SAP Network Space, August 2017 could possibly accommodate employment development, which is a circa 12.8ha reduction from the original proposed allocation. 2.5. However, in addition to HS2 the site suffers from significant ground condition issues and the landowners own aspirations that the site should be developed for residential use. In response to the Publication Draft consultation the landowner states that the “employment scheme is not viable or deliverable”; that “the Council need to plan for the fact that Hawks Park may not come forward for its intended use”; that “the proposed construction of the HS2 Phase 2 line through the centre of the site further detracts from its deliverability for large floorplate employment development”; and that the Council should “consider the allocation of this site for a residential-led mixed-use scheme”. Given that the landowner states that the sites are unviable and will not come forward for employment purposes, the sites do not accord with the Framework and are not available, suitable or achievable. The sites (EG1-35 and EG1-36) should therefore not be allocated for employment and the Site Allocations Plan should be modified accordingly. EG3: Land at Carlton Moor / Leeds Bradford Airport 2.6. Network Space considers that the allocation of 36.2ha of general employment land at Leeds Bradford Airport will not meet the short to medium term employment need in the area. The land is allocated for the future long term expansion of Leeds Bradford Airport and the creation of an employment hub. However, the scheme is dependent on the preparation of a Supplementary Planning Document and the delivery of strategic infrastructure which will guide how development will progress. The success of the allocation is dependent upon future transport infrastructure including new and improved links to the airport. The allocation is therefore for the long term and will not satisfy employment needs of the district in the short to medium term, especially those along the A1 / M1 corridor. MX2-39: Parlington Estate 2.7. Network Space strongly objects to the draft allocation MX2-39 (Parlington estate) which identifies 5 ha of general employment land at the proposed new settlement at Parlington. 2.8. The Core Strategy sets a framework for identifying allocations. Policy SP1 states that development will be focused towards the Main Urban Area, Major Settlements and Smaller Settlements. Policy SP1 also states that the identification of land should be towards previously developed sites within the settlement, followed by other suitable infill sites and 4 Hearing Statement: Matter 7 – Leeds SAP Network Space, August 2017 sustainable extensions to settlements. Furthermore, the policy states that a selective Green Belt review will occur to “direct development consistent with the overall strategy”. 2.9. The Core Strategy through Policies SP8 and SP9 identifies the priorities and level of employment growth required, including providing employment land in accordance with the settlement hierarchy. Policy SP8 also specifically supports employment development in existing locations / sites for general industry and warehousing to take advantage of existing services, accessibility and infrastructure (including rail infrastructure). Furthermore, Policy SP10 indicates the priority order for the review of the Green Belt, which is first the Main Urban Area, followed by the Major Settlements and Smaller Settlements. Only exceptionally will sites be considered outside of the settlement hierarchy, where they will be in sustainable locations and are able to provide a full range of services and facilities and are more appropriate in meeting the spatial objectives of the Plan than the alternatives within the settlement hierarchy. Within this context, “sustainability” is of paramount importance given Spatial Objective 7 to “deliver economic development which makes the best use of land and premises across the district in sustainable locations, accessible to the community and wider labour market”. 2.10. In relation to locating development, the national policy through the Framework is specific in stating that planning should “actively manage patterns of growth to make the fullest possible use of public transport, walking and cycling and focus significant development in locations which are or can be made sustainable” (para 17). 2.11. In order to be “sound” the Site Allocations Plan must follow the principles of the Framework and the Spatial Approach established through the Core Strategy. For the Parlington Estate Mixed Use allocation to be found “sound” in employment terms it must be more appropriate than the alternatives within the settlement hierarchy to accord with Policy SP10. It is clear that the Warren Farm, Micklefield site is an extension to an existing modern employment site (Peckfield Business Park) within walking distance to a train station (in accord with SP8) which forms an extension to a “Smaller settlement” (in accord with SP1 and SP10). The Parlington Estate Mixed Use proposal is a free standing new settlement that does not extend an existing employment site (contrary to SP8); does not lie adjacent to an existing public transport node (contrary to SP8) and does not form an extension to an existing settlement within the Settlement Hierarchy (contrary to SP10). In accordance with the Framework and Core Strategy, sites that are located within or adjacent to the settlement hierarchy (i.e 5 Hearing Statement: Matter 7 – Leeds SAP Network Space, August 2017 Micklefield) should be allocated before a greenfield new settlement that is poorly related to the settlement hierarchy and with poor accessibility credentials. As such, the Parlington Estate site should have been sieved out and should be removed from the Site Allocations Plan. 2.12. The creation of a new settlement in this location is not in accordance with the Core Strategy and would significantly harm the openness and purposes of the Green Belt in this location. It is apparent that there are significant environmental, heritage and technical constraints to the delivery of the Partington site and that detailed assessments should be undertaken and made available to demonstrate that the site is deliverable in accordance with the Framework. Furthermore, the site assessment notes that the site “fails all accessibility criteria” and scores 1 out of 5 for accessibility. Exceptional circumstances have therefore not been demonstrated and the site should be sieved out. The site therefore fails to accord with the principles of the Framework and should be deleted. Thorpe Arch 2.13. Approx. 17.5ha of current employment land at the Thorp Arch Trading Estate in the Outer North East area is the subject of a residential planning application and now an appeal against non-determination. Whilst the Council has previously been supportive of the principle of housing on the site, the City Plans Panel Report (20th July 2017) confirms that the Council do not support the planning application and will be contesting the appeal.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aberford and Parlington Estate 2
    ABERFORD, BECCA BANKS and PARLINGTON ESTATE A fairly easy going 3.5 mile walk involving 2 short hills and 2 stiles (can be muddy around Leyfield Farm). Start point: Cock Beck Bridge, Aberford. LS25 3AA A map for this walk can be obtained by using the following link:- http://www.walk4life.info/walk/harrys-walks-aberford-becca-banks-parlington See NOTE 1 for detailed history Walk: From Cock Beck Bridge, walk away from the beck passing the Arabian Horse public house on your right to take the first lane on your left, opposite a public bridleway sign. Continue along the lane passing cottages on your left and then Becca Bank Villas. 200 yards further on, turn left into a wood along a ‘permissive footpath’. Carry along this distinctive path as it winds its way through the wood eventually arriving below Becca Bank Crag on your right. See NOTE 2 Continue following the path, through the wood to eventually emerge on to the lane that you left a while back. At this point, turn left continuing to walk along the road for about ½ a mile where Becca Hall eventually comes into view. See NOTE3. Before you reach the hall, turn left at a post which says ‘no public right of way’ and within 100 yards on reaching a footpath sign by a wood, turn left through a gate to follow the sign to Parlington. Now continue down a wide track through the wood and at the bottom, on reaching a field, bear slight right along the top of a field with a row of trees on your right.
    [Show full text]
  • Worship Next Sunday, 15 September 2.00Pm, £12 Per Car, Includes Afternoon Tea in the Church Hall THIRTEENTH SUNDAY AFTER Afterwards
    BENEFICES of SHERBURN in ELMET with BARKSTON ASH & SAXTON, and ABERFORD & MICKLEFIELD www.sherburninelmetgroup.org.uk Vicar: The Revd Canon Chris Wilton 01977 682122 Associate Priest: The Revd Nick Plant 0113 287 6064 ~ Permanent ('Distinctive') Deacon: The Revd Wendy Plant 0113 287 6064 Readers: Mr John Taylor 0113 287 2535 ~ Mr Norman Sutcliffe 0113 281 3460 8 September 2019 – TWELFTH SUNDAY AFTER TRINITY (Proper 18) please remember to keep the last five minutes before the services, and especially the time during the administration of Holy Communion, for quiet prayer and reflection (a bell will be rung before the main service at Sherburn) A special welcome today to brothers Kayden Lee Sawdon and Day by Day Book (Sherburn): 14 September - wedding of Tyler Geoffrey Sawdon being baptised at Sherburn, and to all their Kenneth George Fraser & Muriel Mildred Fraser (1940) by Carole family and friends. Temprell (née Fraser). Application forms available in church. START course – a five-week introduction to the Christian faith, Your prayers are asked for those who are ill: Saxton with Towton: starts on Wednesday 25 September at 8.00pm in Sherburn church. June Pick. Aberford: Margaret Taylor, Eileen Whitfield. Micklefield: No meeting on 2 October, then 9, 16, 23 and 30 October. Allen Walker, Michael Needham, Jennifer Hudson, Finley Black, Abbie Flynn, Maggie Moss, Gail Clark. Sherburn & Barkston Ash: Jean Sunday School (Sherburn): starting next week, 15 September, Keeling, Karen Smith, Dorothy Mills, Greta Wilkinson, Hilary Bower, 10.45am in the Church Hall and joining the service in church in Emily Barrie, Sandra Jackson, Vicky Loughnane, Stuart Cram, Hannah time for communion.
    [Show full text]
  • PNW00193 Outer North East No Agree with Proposed Use? HMCA
    Ref: PNW00193 HMCA\Topic: Outer North East Subject: New site suggestion Address: Agree with proposed use? No Soundness Consider the plan sound? No Test of soundness addressed: Positively prepared Effective Justified Consistent with NPPF Comments on soundness: There is too little consideration of other projects in adjoining areas, as well as developments not covered by LCC. Specifically in the Garforth area, the developments in adjoining Parishes as well as Network Rail and HS2/3 planned developments do not seem to link together - in fact it stuns me that STILL we see maps coming out with potential sites for house building that appear to conflict with other plans from other agencies. Changes required to make sound: I have no issues with Garforth and the surrounding area being expanded but Garforth is at the centre for all such developments PLUS Garforth is the nearest town centre, has the closest railway station which serves fast trains as well as stopping services, PLUS it provides the significant connectivity between the M62/M1/A1/A64. Micklefield, Aberford, Kippax and other PCs may expand but if Garforth is the closest town with the closest amenities then the infrastructure needs significant investment and the abstraction of treating Aberford and Barwick as totally separate to Garforth and Kippax does not help. Suggestions: Create a new zone "Leeds East" consisting of Kippax & Methley, Garforth & Swillington, and Harewood ward south of the A64 such that Garforth is the central conurbation (see https://ukelect.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/leeds-v2.png) for illustration. At present Garforth is dependent on the M1 (2 junctions) and three other roads forming a triangle: Aberford/Wakefield Road, Ridge Road and the A63.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnesian Limestone) of Yorkshire
    The building limestones of the Upper Permian, Cadeby Formation (Magnesian Limestone) of Yorkshire Internal Report IR/05/048 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY INTERNAL REPORT IR/05/048 The building limestones of the Upper Permian, Cadeby Formation (Magnesian Limestone) of Yorkshire The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data are used with the permission of the G.K. Lott & A.H. Cooper Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Ordnance Survey licence number Licence No:100017897/5. Keywords Permian, building stones, Magnesian Limestone. Front cover Imbricated, laminated, rip-up clasts. Bibliographical reference LOTT, G.K. & COOPER, A.H. 2005. The building limestones of the Upper Permian, Cadeby Formation (Magnesian Limestone) of Yorkshire. British Geological Survey Internal Report, IR/05/048. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected] You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. © NERC 2005. All rights reserved Keyworth, Nottingham British Geological Survey 2005 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of Survey publications is available from the BGS Sales Desks at Nottingham, Edinburgh and London; see contact details below or shop online at www.geologyshop.com The London Information Office also maintains a reference collection of BGS publications including maps for consultation. The Survey publishes an annual catalogue of its maps and other publications; this catalogue is available from any of the BGS Sales Desks.
    [Show full text]
  • Illustrative Option Schemes in CP5 HLOS
    Illustrative Option schemes in CP5 HLOS The Department worked with Network Rail, the train operators and the transport authorities in the major cities to build up shared information on current rail usage. As far as practicable a shared view was also agreed on forecast demand, using standard rail industry models but adjusting these where there was evidence of likely stronger growth. This forecast growth is stated as a peak demand to be met in the HLOS. The forecast growth was assessed against current plans for train service provision in 2019. Illustrative train service enhancements that provided the capacity to meet this demand were identified and modelled for the morning peak services in London, Birmingham, Manchester and Leeds. In many cases these were directly based on the work undertaken by recent rail industry Route Utilisation Strategies (RUS). In some cases, notably in Leeds and Manchester, recent Government commitments to funding electrification and capacity enhancements had happened after the RUS and so the Department worked with key stakeholders to determine the most likely train service patterns the infrastructure changes might produce. The illustrative peak train services are not what will happen; that will be guided both by the rail industry’s response to the HLOS in the Strategic Business Plan for CP5 where the industry will set out how it proposes to meet the HLOS, and by the outcome of future train operator franchise competitions. But the illustrative train services are needed for the Department to confirm that a value for money solution can be provided to meet peak demand. It is likely the rail industry will produce a more detailed and efficient solution, and in this context the illustrative option can be viewed as the simple answer that should be bettered.
    [Show full text]
  • Garden Village, Micklefield, Leeds, LS25 4AD
    Garden Village, Micklefield, Leeds, LS25 4AD Garden Village, Micklefield, Leeds, LS25 4AD Asking Price: £132,500 A well presented three bedroom mid terrace which has been renovated by the current owner and set in the village of Micklefield. Micklefield continues to grow as a popular village with local amenities and great commuter links for those who work in Leeds or York due to the proximity to the railway station and also the A1 link roads. Entering into the property a spacious lounge to the front of the property and to the rear a fitted kitchen dining area with a patio door leading out into the garden. To the first floor there are three bedrooms and a house bathroom. To the rear is an enclosed garden with a paved patio and gate access to a driveway which provides off street parking. A viewing is a must to appreciate the accommodation that is on offer. ENERGY PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATE The energy efficiency rating is a measure of the overall efficiency of a home. The higher the rating the more energy efficient the home is and the lower the fuel bills will be. Hunters 5A Market Place, Wetherby, West Yorkshire, LS22 6LQ | 01937 588228 [email protected] | www.hunters.com VAT Reg. No 358 6765 43 | Registered No: 12691503 | Registered Office: 23 North Park Road, Harrogate, North Yorkshire, HG1 5PD A Hunters Franchise owned and operated under licence by Xscapade Property Group Ltd T/a Hunters Wetherby LOCATION BEDROOM THREE Micklefield is a village that is placed in between 2.57m (8' 5") X 2.54m (8' 4") Leeds and York and boasts many local amenities Window to the rear aspect.
    [Show full text]
  • WEST YORKSHIRE Extracted from the Database of the Milestone Society a Photograph Exists for Milestones Listed Below but Would Benefit from Updating!
    WEST YORKSHIRE Extracted from the database of the Milestone Society A photograph exists for milestones listed below but would benefit from updating! National ID Grid Reference Road No. Parish Location Position YW_ADBL01 SE 0600 4933 A6034 ADDINGHAM Silsden Rd, S of Addingham above EP149, just below small single storey barn at bus stop nr entrance to Cringles Park Home YW_ADBL02 SE 0494 4830 A6034 SILSDEN Bolton Rd; N of Silsden Estate YW_ADBL03 SE 0455 4680 A6034 SILSDEN Bolton Rd; Silsden just below 7% steep hill sign YW_ADBL04 SE 0388 4538 A6034 SILSDEN Keighley Rd; S of Silsden on pavement, 100m south of town sign YW_BAIK03 SE 0811 5010 B6160 ADDINGHAM Addingham opp. Bark La in narrow verge, under hedge on brow of hill in wall by Princefield Nurseries opp St Michaels YW_BFHA04 SE 1310 2905 A6036 SHELF Carr House Rd;Buttershaw Church YW_BFHA05 SE 1195 2795 A6036 BRIGHOUSE Halifax Rd, just north of jct with A644 at Stone Chair on pavement at little layby, just before 30 sign YW_BFHA06 SE 1145 2650 A6036 NORTHOWRAM Bradford Rd, Northowram in very high stone wall behind LP39 YW_BFHG01 SE 1708 3434 A658 BRADFORD Otley Rd; nr Peel Park, opp. Cliffe Rd nr bus stop, on bend in Rd YW_BFHG02 SE 1815 3519 A658 BRADFORD Harrogate Rd, nr Silwood Drive on verge opp parade of shops Harrogate Rd; north of Park Rd, nr wall round playing YW_BFHG03 SE 1889 3650 A658 BRADFORD field near bus stop & pedestrian controlled crossing YW_BFHG06 SE 212 403 B6152 RAWDON Harrogate Rd, Rawdon about 200m NE of Stone Trough Inn Victoria Avenue; TI north of tunnel
    [Show full text]
  • Temple Newsham Leeds 1 1405 M1 North At
    LOC LOC STREET LOC TOWN STREET 1/ (NORTH BOUND) TEMPLE NEWSHAM LEEDS 1 1405 M1 NORTH AT TEMPLE NEWSAM 1 1650 A1 (M) NORTH PARRLINGTON 1 2055 DENBY DALE ROAD WAKEFIELD 1 A 1 SELBY FORK SELBY 1 A1 PONTEFRACT 1 SELBY FORK 1 A1 (M) DARRINGTON PONTEFRACT 1 A1 (M) DARRINGTON N/B TURN GATE PONTEFRACT 1 A1 (M) FERRYBRIDGE PONTEFRACT 2 A1 (M) FERRYBRIDGE N/B PONTEFRACT 1 A1 (M) FERRYBRIDGE WEST BOUND PONTEFRACT 1 A1 (m) HOLMFIELD INTERCHANGE PONTEFRACT 2 A1 (M) NBC ABERFORD LEEDS 1 A1 (M) NORTH FERRYBRIDGE 1 A1 (M) NORTH AT BRAMHAM LEEDS 1 A1 (M) NORTH AT FERRYBRIDGE PONTEFRACT 2 A1 (M) NORTH AT PARRINGTON PONTEFRACT 1 A1 (M) NORTH AT PARRLINGTON PONTEFRACT 1 A1 (M) NORTH BOUND DARRINGTON PONTEFRACT 1 A1 (M) NORTH BOUND FERRYBRIDGE PONTEFRACT 2 A1 (M) NORTH FERRYBRIDGE PONTEFRACT 2 A1 (M) NORTH HOLMFIELD KNOTTINGLEY 1 A1 (M) NORTH HOOK MOOR LEEDS 1 A1 (M) NORTH, DARRINGTON PONTEFRACT 1 A1 (m) NORTHBOUND HOLMFIELD, KNOTTINGLEY 1 A1 (m) S/B HOOK MOOR 2 A1 (M) SOURTH AT SELBY FORK SELBY 1 A1 (M) SOUTH ABERFORD 1 A1 (M) SOUTH AT DARRINGTON PONTEFRACT 1 A1 (M) SOUTH AT MICKLEFIELD SELBY 1 A1 (M) SOUTH BOUND FERRYBRIDGE PONTEFRACT 1 A1 (M) SOUTH FERRYBRIDGE PONTEFRACT 1 A1 (M) SOUTH MICKLEFIELD SELBY 1 A1 (M) SOUTH PARRLINGTON 1 A1 (M) SOUTHBOUND HOOKMOOR 1 LEEDS 1 A1 (M) SOUTHBOUND LEDSHAM LEEDS 1 A1 AT HILME PONTEFRACT 1 A1 BRAMHAM WETHERBY 1 A1 FERRYBRIDGE PONTEFRACT 1 A1 FRYSTON PARK PONTEFRACT 1 A1 M LEEDS 1 PONTEFRACT 1 A1 M SOUTH FERRY BRIDGE WAKEFIELD 1 A1 M DARRINGTON PONTEFRACT 1 A1 M FERRYBRIDGE PONTEFRACT 1 A1 M FERRYBRIDGE NORTH PONTEFRACT
    [Show full text]
  • Moxon Way, Moor Lane Trading Estate, Sherburn in Elmet, Leeds Ls25 6Es
    MOXON WAY, MOOR LANE TRADING ESTATE, SHERBURN IN ELMET, LEEDS LS25 6ES LONG LET INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT WITH FIXED RENTAL UPLIFTS MOXON WAY, MOOR LANE TRADING ESTATE SHERBURN IN ELMET, LEEDS LS25 6ES A1(M) 3.5 MILES MOXON WAY, MOOR LANE TRADING ESTATE SHERBURN IN ELMET, LEEDS LS25 6ES INVESTMENT SUMMARY Sherburn in Elmet is strategically located close to Current rent passing of £695,000 per annum Junction 42 of the A1(M) offering excellent access to Fixed Rental Uplifts every five years with rent rising to the national motorway network £805,695 per annum in 2020 and £934,021 per annum Moor Lane Trading Estate is a traditional industrial in 2025 estate to the east of Leeds and it is one of Yorkshire’s Freehold most prominent distribution parks with notable occupiers including Sainsbury’s, Eddie Stobart, Offers sought in excess of £9,650,000 (Nine Million Debenhams and Legal & General (Modular Homes) Six Hundred and Fifty Thousand Pounds) reflecting an attractive net initial yield of 6.75% and the following Detached distribution hub extending to a gross running yield profile assuming purchaser’s costs at 6.69%: internal area of 253,352 sq ft (23,537.1 sq m) 2020 - 7.83% The site comprises 12.15 acres (4.91 hectares) 2025 - 9.07% Let entirely to Esterform Packaging Limited for a A purchase at this level reflects alow capital value of further 12 years £38 psf. MOXON WAY, MOOR LANE TRADING ESTATE SHERBURN IN ELMET, LEEDS LS25 6ES A162 LOCATION Sherburn-in-Elmet 1222 B MOORE LANE B1222 BISH OPDYKE ROAD LOCATION SHERBURN-IN-ELMET 22 2 SHERBURN 1 B INDUSTRIAL Micklefield AREA 62 1 A eeds is Yorkshire’s principal financial centre A1(M) SHERBURN AERO CLUB benefiting from a catchment population of approximately 1.3 million people.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda, Council, 2020 07 02
    MICKLEFIELD PARISH COUNCIL Official Notice of a Meeting of Micklefield Parish Council to be Held on: Thursday 2nd July 2020, at Zoom.us to commence at 7.15pm. Members of the Council are summoned to attend this meeting. Meetings are open to press and public (please contact the Clerk for joining details). The press and public may only speak during the public forum. Signed: Clerk Date: 26th June 2020 AGENDA 20/01 REMOTE MEETINGS STANDING ORDERS /1 To receive for consideration the draft Remote Meetings Standing Orders and agree any amendments (document attached) /2 To approve the adoption of Remote Meetings Standing Orders as an addendum to the Parish Council’s Standing orders 20/02 To receive questions and comments from members of the public (PUBLIC FORUM) 20/03 To disclose or draw attention to any disclosable pecuniary interests and any other significant interests that the member wishes to declare in the public interest, for the purposes of the Localism Act 2011, s31 and the Members’ Code of Conduct paras 10-14 20/04 APOLOGIES /1 To receive apologies for absence /2 To approve reasons for absence 20/05 To consider dispensation requests received by the Clerk prior to the meeting 20/06 To identify any items requiring the exclusion of the public, in accordance with the provisions of the Public Bodies (Admission to Meetings) Act 1960, s2, and the reason for exclusion 20/07 To approve the minutes of the meeting held on Thursday 5 March 2020 (circulated in April) 20/08 To note matters arising from the minutes of the meeting held on Thursday 5
    [Show full text]
  • 24 March 2016 Subject: Planning Application 15/01973/FU
    Originator: Andrew Crates Tel: 0113 222 4409 Report of the Chief Planning Officer CITY PLANS PANEL Date: 24th March 2016 Subject: Planning Application 15/01973/FU – Development of 291 residential dwellings with open space and associated infrastructure on land east of Great North Road, Micklefield. APPLICANT DATE VALID TARGET DATE Barratt Homes and 18th June 2015 28th March 2016 Persimmon Homes Electoral Wards Affected: Specific Implications For: Kippax and Methley Equality and Diversity Community Cohesion Yes Ward Members consulted Narrowing the Gap (referred to in report) RECOMMENDATION: DEFER AND DELEGATE approval to the Chief Planning Officer in order to finalise the conditions and S106 agreement to cover the following matters: 1. Affordable Housing – 15% (with a 60% social rent and 40% submarket split). 2. Public open space provisions on-site and off-site commuted sum. 3. Travel Plan including a monitoring fee of £3,455. 4. Cycle facilities at Micklefield Station - £8,000. 5. Sustainable travel fund at a cost of £605 per dwelling. 4. Employment and training initiatives (applies to the construction of the development). In the circumstances where the S106 agreement has not been completed within 3 months of the Panel resolution, the final determination of the application shall be delegated to the Chief Planning Officer Conditions 1. Time limit 2. Plans to be approved 3. Materials 4. Details of fences and walls to be provided. 5. Statement of construction practice. 6. Restriction on hours of construction to 0800-1800 hours on weekdays and 0800-1300 hours on Saturdays, with no operations on Sundays and Bank Holidays. 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Micklefield Parish Council
    MICKLEFIELD PARISH COUNCIL Official Notice of a Meeting of Micklefield Parish Council to be held on: Thursday 1 December 2016, in the I.T. Suite of Micklefield Youth and Adult Centre (The Old Fire Station), Great North Road, to commence at 7.15pm. Members of the Council are summoned to attend this meeting. Meetings are open to press and public. The press and public may only speak during the public forum. Signed: Clerk Date: 25th November 2016 AGENDA 16/204 To receive questions and comments from members of the public (PUBLIC FORUM) 16/205 To disclose or draw attention to any disclosable pecuniary interests and any other significant interests that the member wishes to declare in the public interest, for the purposes of the Localism Act 2011, s31 and the Members’ Code of Conduct paras 10-14 16/206 APOLOGIES /1To receive apologies for absence /2 To approve reasons for absence 16/207 To consider dispensation requests received by the Clerk prior to the meeting 16/208 To identify any items requiring the exclusion of the public, in accordance with the provisions of the Public Bodies (Admission to Meetings) Act 1960, s2, and the reason for exclusion 16/209 To approve the minutes of the meeting held on Thursday 3 November 2016 (attached) 16/210 To note matters arising from the minutes of the meeting held on Thursday 3 November 2016 16/211 To note crime figures for November (supplied by Garforth NPT) 16/212 To note correspondence received (list attached) 16/213 To review working group membership (current list attached) 16/214 FINANCE /1 To approve
    [Show full text]