The Fate of Lipids in Archaeological Burial Soils
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The fate of lipids in archaeological burial soils Kimberley Ann Green PhD University of York Chemistry July 2013 The fate of lipids in archaeological burial soils Abstract Geochemical techniques have been developed in order to systematically analyse soils collected from several burial sites. Through the extraction and GC analysis of burial soils organic signatures that inform an understanding of the burial environment, including aspects relating to the individual or culture in which they lived, have been obtained. GC analysis revealed that the profiles of several lipid signatures found in the burial soil samples, including n-alkanes, n-alkanals, n-alkanols, fatty acids and steroids, have shown similarities to signatures relating to degraded human adipose tissue and bacterial signatures. The abundance of lipid signatures increases around the skeletal remains, particularly the gut region, which suggests that these components are present because of the remains. Fatty acids and steroids have been typically found in the analysis of tissues from mummies and bog bodies and are also present in adipocere, although the oxidative degradation products (hydroxy fatty acid and diacids) that have also been observed in these tissues have been absent during this study. However fatty acid reduction products such as n-alkanes, n-alkanals and n-alkanols have been observed in several of the graves suggesting that the remains can undergo microbial reduction in the soil. In addition several specific signatures that are exclusive to only a few samples from the remains have provided information on the nature of the burial. The presence of coprostanol in the burial samples has the potential to infer on the individuals last meal, while the presence of specific resin acids within the soil provides information on the materials used to construct a coffin. The presence of pine diterpenoids observed in a burial from Iceland has suggested that materials, such as pine, were imported at the time as pine trees are not native to Iceland. Another specific plant signature, Hopenone b, has further revealed information about the nature of the burial inferring that the plant Cypress Spurge (also known as grave yard weed) was present within close proximity to the grave. i The fate of lipids in archaeological burial soils Table of contents Abstract.....................................................................................................................i Table of contents......................................................................................................ii List of tables.............................................................................................................x List of figures..........................................................................................................xi Acknowledgements...............................................................................................xxi Author’s declaration.............................................................................................xxii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 The study of archaeological human remains 2 1.2 Organic matter from human remains 3 1.2.1 Biomarker concept 5 1.2.2 Transformation of biological molecules 6 1.2.3 Effects of burial environment on the degradation of biological material 11 1.3 Chemical analysis 13 1.3.1 Mummies 14 1.3.2 Bog bodies 16 1.3.3 Forensic Studies 18 1.4 Soil organic matter (SOM) 20 1.4.1 Mobility of lipids in soils 22 1.5 Analytical Techniques 24 1.5.1 Extraction 24 1.5.2 GC analysis 25 1.5.2.1 FID detection 26 1.5.3 Mass spectrometry 26 1.5.3.1 Electron ionisation 26 ii The fate of lipids in archaeological burial soils 1.6 InterArChive 28 1.6.1 Sampling strategy 28 1.6.2 Aims 30 CHAPTER 2: EVALUATION OF ANALYTICAL METHODS 32 2.1 Introduction 33 2.1.1 Sample storage 33 2.1.2 Accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) 33 2.1.3 Fractionation 35 2.1.4 GC 36 2.1.4.1 GC preparation 36 2.1.4.2 GC-FID 36 2.1.4.3 Fast GC 37 2.2 Results and discussion 38 2.2.1 Sample storage 38 2.2.2 ASE 39 2.2.3 Fractionation 40 2.2.4 GC analysis 46 2.2.4.1 Derivatisation 46 2.2.4.2 GC-FID 47 2.2.4.3 Fast GC 48 2.3 Conclusions 49 iii The fate of lipids in archaeological burial soils CHAPTER 3: COMPOSITION AND DISPLACEMENT OF LIPIDS IN SOILS FROM IRON AGE AND ROMAN BURIALS 51 3.1 Introduction 52 3.2 Heslington East (HE09) 52 3.2.1 Site description and sampling 52 3.2.2 Results and Discussion 55 3.2.2.1 Bulk soil analysis 55 3.2.2.2 Total extracts 59 3.2.2.3 Hydrocarbon and aromatic fractions 59 3.2.2.4 Medium polar fractions 61 3.2.2.5 High polar fractions 63 3.2.3 Conclusion 68 3.3 Basly (LCB) 69 3.3.1 Site description and sampling 69 3.3.2 Results and Discussion 73 3.3.2.1 Bulk soil analysis 73 3.3.2.2 Total extracts 76 3.3.3 Conclusion 79 3.4 Thessaloniki (NSS) 80 3.4.1 Site description and sampling 80 3.4.2 Results and Discussion 84 iv The fate of lipids in archaeological burial soils 3.4.2.1 Bulk soil analysis 84 3.4.2.2 Total extracts 87 3.4.2.3 Hydrocarbon and aromatic fractions 87 3.4.2.4 Medium polar fractions 90 3.4.2.5 High polar fractions 90 3.4.3 Conclusion 93 3.5 Conclusions 94 CHAPTER 4: DISTRIBUTIONS AND FATE OF LIPIDS IN MEDIEVAL AND 16TH CENTURY BURIALS 97 4.1 Introduction 98 4.2 Syningthwaite (CGS09) 98 4.2.1 Site description and sampling 98 4.2.2 Results and Discussion 102 4.2.2.1 Bulk soil analysis 102 4.2.2.2 Total extracts 104 4.2.2.3 Hydrocarbon and aromatic fractions 106 4.2.2.4 Medium polar fractions 108 4.2.2.5 High polar fractions 108 4.2.3 Conclusion 109 4.3 Edinburgh (ETS08) 110 4.3.1 Site description and sampling 110 v The fate of lipids in archaeological burial soils 4.3.2 Results and Discussion 114 4.3.2.1 Bulk soil analysis 114 4.3.2.2 Total extracts 117 4.3.2.3 Hydrocarbon and aromatic fractions 117 4.3.2.4 Medium polar fractions 120 4.3.2.5 High polar fractions 124 4.3.3 Conclusion 127 4.4 Mechelen (G422) 128 4.4.1 Site description and sampling 128 4.4.2 Results and Discussion 133 4.4.2.1 Bulk soil analysis 133 4.4.2.2 Hydrocarbon and aromatic fractions 136 4.4.2.3 Medium polar fractions 138 4.4.2.4 High polar fractions 139 4.4.3 Conclusion 144 4.5 Conclusions 146 CHAPTER 5: COFFIN BURIALS FROM NORTHERN EUROPE 150 5.1 Introduction 151 5.2 Iceland (HST-11) 151 5.2.1 Site description and sampling 151 5.2.2 Results and Discussion 154 vi The fate of lipids in archaeological burial soils 5.2.2.1 Bulk soil analysis 154 5.2.2.2 Hydrocarbon fractions 156 5.2.2.3 Aromatic fractions 157 5.2.2.4 Medium polar fractions 158 5.2.2.5 High polar fractions 159 5.2.3 Conclusion 162 5.3 Sala (RAA) 163 5.3.1 Site description and sampling 163 5.3.2 Results and Discussion 166 5.3.2.1 Bulk soil analysis 166 5.3.2.2 Total extracts 168 5.3.2.3 Hydrocarbon and aromatic fractions 169 5.3.2.4 Medium polar fractions 170 5.3.2.5 High polar fractions 171 5.3.3 Conclusion 174 5.4 Thaon (TESP) 176 5.4.1 Site description and sampling 176 5.4.2 Results and Discussion 179 5.4.2.1 Bulk soil analysis 179 5.4.2.2 Total Extracts 183 5.4.2.3 Hydrocarbon fractions 184 5.4.2.4 Aromatic fractions 184 vii The fate of lipids in archaeological burial soils 5.4.2.5 Medium polar fractions 189 5.4.2.6 High polar fractions 192 5.4.3 Conclusion 193 5.5 Conclusions 194 CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK 198 6.1 Conclusions 199 6.1.1 Analytical strategy 199 6.1.2 GC amenable components 200 6.1.2.1 Lipids associated with the remains and their origins 200 6.1.2.2 Degradation pathways inferred from the analysis of grave soils 204 6.1.3 Variability of molecular signatures with anatomical position 207 6.1.4 Transportation of lipid signatures 208 6.1.5 Specific molecular signatures associated with archaeological human remains 210 6.2 Overall conclusions 212 6.3 Future work 213 CHAPTER 7: EXPERIMENTAL 215 7.1 General procedures 216 viii The fate of lipids in archaeological burial soils 7.2 Glassware 216 7.3 Sample collection 216 7.4 Drying, grinding and sieving 217 7.5 Elemental analysis 217 7.5.1 Carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen and sulfur (CHNS) 218 7.5.2 Total organic carbon (TOC) 218 7.6 Extraction of grave soils 219 7.7 Sample fractionation and derivatisation 219 7.7.1 Fractionation 219 7.7.2 GC sample preparation 220 7.8 GC analysis 220 7.8.1 GC-FID 220 7.8.2 Fast GC 221 7.8.3 GC-MS 221 Abbreviations 222 References 224 ix The fate of lipids in archaeological burial soils List of Tables Chapter 2 Table 2.1: Classification of Rapid GC (Matisova and Domotorova, 2003) .......38 Table 2.2: List of parameters for the ASE method................................................39 Chapter 3 Table 3.1: Samples collected from grave HE09 713 726, including sample numbers and the locations from which they were collected .................................55 Table 3.2: Samples collected from grave LCB 2121, including sample numbers and the locations from which they were collected.................................................72 Table 3.3: Samples collected from grave NSS Tφ182 including sample numbers and the locations from which they were collected.................................................83 Chapter 4 Table 4.1: Samples collected from grave CSG09 G2, including sample numbers and the locations from which they were collected...............................................101 Table 4.2: Samples collected from grave ETCS08 6B, including sample numbers and the locations from which they were collected...............................................113 Table 4.3: Samples collected from grave G422, including sample numbers and the locations from which they were collected............................................................132