DOCSLIB.ORG

Mesopotamia (The Tigris & Euphrates) Egypt (The Nile River

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mesopotamia (The Tigris & Euphrates) Egypt (The Nile River Mesopotamia (The Tigris & Euphrates) Egypt (The Nile River Valley) India (The Indus River) China (The Yellow River) 1 Even Odd Left Side Items Page # Right Side Items Page # Agriculture & Domestication Rdg- Agriculture and Animals 26 27 Mesopotamia Map 28 Geography & HEI Notes 29 5W’s of Religion 30 Social Structure Notes 31 Hammurabi Situations 32 Code of Hammurabi Notes 33 Cuneiform Q & A 34 Cultural & Scientific Notes 35 Civilization Compare 36 Traits of Civilization 37 2 Advanced Social Studies Even Odd Left Side Items Page # Right Side Items Page # PBL Task #3 PBL Summative 30 31 Mesopotamia Map 32 Geography & HEI Notes 33 5W’s of Religion 34 Social Structure Notes 35 Hammurabi Situations 36 Code of Hammurabi Notes 37 Cuneiform Q & A 38 Cultural & Scientific Notes 39 Civilization Compare 40 Traits of Civilization 41 3 Ancient Mesopotamia Learning Goal Students will be able to describe the geography, government, religion, culture and scientific contributions of ancient Mesopotamia and its influences on the development of later civilizations. Strand 2: Concept 2: PO 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 9 4 Learning Goal Scale for CSA Students will be able to describe the geography, government, religion, culture and scientific contributions of ancient Mesopotamia and its influences on the development of later civilizations. 4: Exceeds Proficiency 2: Approaching Proficiency 1: Not Yet 0 3: Proficient Students will be able to Students will be able Students will be able to Students will be able to No Evidence analyze the geography, to describe the describe FOUR of the describe TWO of the government, religion, geography, following: geography, following: geography, government, religion, culture government, religion, culture and scientific government, religion, contributions of ancient and scientific contributions of culture and scientific culture and scientific Mesopotamia and locate ancient Mesopotamia and/or contributions of ancient its influence based on contributions of its influences on the Mesopotamia and/or its evidence from other ancient Mesopotamia development of later influences on the civilizations. development of later civilizations. and its influences on the development of civilizations. later civilizations. 5 IF TIME- Introduction to the Civilization of Ancient Mesopotamia: https://youtu.be/AlVNDHwyHeE 6 ANCIENT MESOPOTAMIA 3600 BCE Nickname: “Cradle of Civilization” Mesopotamia means “The Land Between Two Rivers” The Tigris River & The Euphrates River 7 Essential Question: Why is Mesopotamia’s name significant? Mesopotamia means “the land between two rivers.” It is referred to the “cradle of civilization” because it was the birthplace of a well-organized, developed society or culture. Label the following bodies of water & rivers, landforms, regions and cities. Bodies of Water Landforms Regions Cities & Rivers ▪ Mediterranean Zagros Mesopotamia 1. Agade Sea Mountains 2. Babylon ▪ Persian Gulf 3. Kish ▪ Dead Sea 4. Nippur ▪ Tigris River 5. Umma ▪ Euphrates River ▪ Jordan River 6. Lagash 7. Uruk Textbook p. 79 8. Ur 8 9 Mesopotamia Map ISN p. 28 10 11 Using your Map to Answer Questions about The Fertile Crescent & Mesopotamia As● a classWhat orcapital with city a partner is shown discuss on the the map? following Agade questions while you refer to ●yourWhich map. city is located the farthest from a river? Lagash 1. What● What capital body ofcity water is shown do both on thethe Tigris map? and Euphrates rivers empty into? The Persian Gulf 2. Which city is located the farthest from a river? ● Which empire on the map is more recent? The Babylonian Empire 3. What● What body is the of area water between do both the the Euphrates Tigris and and Euphrates Tigris rivers rivers called? empty into? 4. WhichMesopotamia empire on the map is more recent? ● Imagine you are traveling from Umma to Agade using only river transport. 5. What is the area between the Euphrates and Tigris rivers called? Describe your route. South along the Tigris River towards Ur, then 6. Imaginenorthwest you onare the traveling Euphrates from River Umma towards to Agade Uruk followed using only by Babylon,river transport. and Describefinally arriving your route. in Agade. 7. What● What direction direction is is Ur Ur from from Babylon? Babylon? South and east or southeast 8. Why● Why might might all all of of these these cities cities bebe locatedlocated soso close close to to rivers? rivers? The rivers provide good transportation, irrigation, and food. 12 Cornell Notes Set-Up ISN p. 29 Topic: Topic: Geography & Human Environmental Interaction of Ancient Mesopotamia (Textbook p. 82-86) Essential Question: How did the land between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers support agriculture? Notes: THINK & SEARCH strategy- The answers are present in the text but you have to think and search for them. Cue Questions: 1. What does Mesopotamia mean (p.83)? 2. What are the benefits of living near water (p.83)? 3. Name TWO rivers that empty into the Persian Gulf (p.83). 4. Describe how the farmers were supported or helped by the flooding of the rivers (p.84). 5. Describe how the flooding hurt the farmers (p.85). 13 Geography & Human Environmental Interaction of Ancient Mesopotamia ● EU-phrates River Rap: http://youtu.be/84y2q4giihY 14 5W’s of Religion (ISN p.30) WHO? Priests worked to satisfy the gods and claimed to have influence on them. People accepted them as leaders. -Theocracy WHAT? WHEN? They were polytheistic meaning Sumerian When you died, they believed the they believed in many gods or RELIGION dead went to the land of no return goddess. called the underworld. Hardships & (Complex unhappiness of life continued in Institution) death. WHERE? WHY? The largest and most important structure was They believed the gods controlled the floods, the Ziggurat (temple). People made offerings droughts, and invasions from others. to the gods with surplus grain. It was the center of the city and functioned as a city hall run by the priests. 15 16 Mesopotamian Ziggurat (Temple) Religion- WHERE? The largest and most important structure was the Ziggurat (temple). People made offerings to the gods with surplus grain. It was the center of the city and functioned as a city hall run by the priests. 17 How to prepare for the Geography and Religion QUIZ To prepare for the section covering Geography- study and quiz yourself using your Cornell Notes - Cues Questions and Note-taking section. To prepare for the section covering Religion- Combine the parts of the graphic organizer into a paragraph that summarizes the key information. Make connections between the Who?, What?, When?, Where?, and Why? Try to see the BIG picture of their religion. 18.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Babylonian Populations, Servility, and Cuneiform Records
    Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 60 (2017) 715-787 brill.com/jesh Babylonian Populations, Servility, and Cuneiform Records Jonathan S. Tenney Cornell University [email protected] Abstract To date, servility and servile systems in Babylonia have been explored with the tradi- tional lexical approach of Assyriology. If one examines servility as an aggregate phe- nomenon, these subjects can be investigated on a much larger scale with quantitative approaches. Using servile populations as a point of departure, this paper applies both quantitative and qualitative methods to explore Babylonian population dynamics in general; especially morbidity, mortality, and ages at which Babylonians experienced important life events. As such, it can be added to the handful of publications that have sought basic demographic data in the cuneiform record, and therefore has value to those scholars who are also interested in migration and settlement. It suggests that the origins of servile systems in Babylonia can be explained with the Nieboer-Domar hy- pothesis, which proposes that large-scale systems of bondage will arise in regions with * This was written in honor, thanks, and recognition of McGuire Gibson’s efforts to impart a sense of the influence of aggregate population behavior on Mesopotamian development, notably in his 1973 article “Population Shift and the Rise of Mesopotamian Civilization”. As an Assyriology student who was searching texts for answers to similar questions, I have occasionally found myself in uncharted waters. Mac’s encouragement helped me get past my discomfort, find the data, and put words on the page. The necessity of assembling Mesopotamian “demographic” measures was something made clear to me by the M.A.S.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Possibilities of Restoring the Iraqi Marshes Known As the Garden of Eden
    Water and Climate Change in the MENA-Region Adaptation, Mitigation,and Best Practices International Conference April 28-29, 2011 in Berlin, Germany POSSIBILITIES OF RESTORING THE IRAQI MARSHES KNOWN AS THE GARDEN OF EDEN N. Al-Ansari and S. Knutsson Dept. Civil, Mining and Environmental Engineering, Lulea University, Sweden Abstract The Iraqi marsh lands, which are known as the Garden of Eden, cover an area about 15000- 20000 sq. km in the lower part of the Mesopotamian basin where the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers flow. The marshes lie on a gently sloping plan which causes the two rivers to meander and split in branches forming the marshes and lakes. The marshes had developed after series of transgression and regression of the Gulf sea water. The marshes lie on the thick fluvial sediments carried by the rivers in the area. The area had played a prominent part in the history of man kind and was inhabited since the dawn of civilization by the Summarian more than 6000 BP. The area was considered among the largest wetlands in the world and the greatest in west Asia where it supports a diverse range of flora and fauna and human population of more than 500000 persons and is a major stopping point for migratory birds. The area was inhabited since the dawn of civilization by the Sumerians about 6000 years BP. It had been estimated that 60% of the fish consumed in Iraq comes from the marshes. In addition oil reserves had been discovered in and near the marshlands. The climate of the area is considered continental to subtropical.
    [Show full text]
  • Neo-Assyrian Period 934–612 BC the Black Obelisk
    Map of the Assyrian empire up to the reign of Sargon II (721–705 BC) Neo-Assyrian period 934–612 BC The history of the ancient Middle East during the first millennium BC is dominated by the expansion of the Assyrian state and its rivalry with Babylonia. At its height in the seventh century BC, the Assyrian empire was the largest and most powerful that the world had ever known; it included all of Mesopotamia, Syria, Palestine, and Egypt, as well as parts of Anatolia and Iran. Ceramics with very thin, pale fabric, referred to as Palace Ware, were the luxury ware of the Assyrians. Glazed ceramics are also characteristically Neo-Assyrian in form and decoration. The Black Obelisk Excavated by Austin Henry Lanyard in 1845 at Nimrud (ancient Kalhu), the black limestone sculpture known as the Black Obelisk commemorates the achievements of the Assyrian king Shalmaneser III (858–824 BC); a cast of the monument stands today in the Dr. Norman Solhkhah Family Assyrian Empire Gallery (C224–227) at the OI Museum. Twenty relief panels, distributed in five rows on the four sides of the obelisk, show the delivery of tribute from subject peoples and vassal kings (a king that owes loyalty to another ruler). A line of cuneiform script below each identifies the tribute and source. The Assyrian king is shown in two panels at the top, first depicted as a warrior with a bow and arrow, receiving Sua, king of Gilzanu (northwestern Iran); and second, as a worshiper with a libation bowl in hand, receiving Jehu, king of the House of Omri (ancient northern Israel).
    [Show full text]
  • The First Record of Eriocheir Sinensis H. Milne Edwards, 1853 (Crustacea: Brachyura: Varunidae) from the Basrah Area of Southern Iraq
    Aquatic Invasions (2006) Volume 1, Issue 2: 51-54 DOI 10.3391/ai.2006.1.2.1 © 2006 The Author(s) Journal compilation © 2006 REABIC (http://www.reabic.net) This is an Open Access article Research article The first record of Eriocheir sinensis H. Milne Edwards, 1853 (Crustacea: Brachyura: Varunidae) from the Basrah Area of Southern Iraq Paul F. Clark1, Ibtsam M. Abdul-Sahib2 and Muhamed S. Al-Asadi2 1Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, England E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Biology, Marine Science Centre, University of Basrah, Basrah, Iraq E-mails: [email protected] ; [email protected] Received 26 February 2006; accepted in revised form 26 April 2006 Abstract The capture of Eriocheir sinensis H. Milne Edwards, 1853, the Chinese mitten crab is reported for the first time from Southern Iraq, in the Shatt Al Basrah Canal, 20 June 2005, south of the Euphrates and Tigris Rivers (Iraq, Syria and Turkey) and west of the Karun River (Iran). Key words: Eriocheir sinensis, Shatt Al- Basrah Canal, Iraq Introduction records of Eriocheir sinensis were first reported from Germany, Poland, Lithuania, Estonia, Recently Robbins et al. (2006) reported the first Sweden and Finland by Boettger (1934), Chinese mitten crab from Central Asia. The Linnaniemi (1933) and Panning (1938). specimen was a male collected from the River The purpose of this paper is to record a second Tazeh Bekandeh, 37º26’54"N. 49º25’07"E., less mitten crab from Central Asia that was captured than 6 km from Caspian Sea, 5.20 km from ca.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Desertification of the Mesopotamian Plain
    Journal of Earth Sciences and Geotechnical Engineering, Vol.10, No.4, 2020, 125-142 ISSN: 1792-9040 (print version), 1792-9660 (online) Scientific Press International Limited Desertification and Salinization of the Mesopotamian Plain: A Critical Review Varoujan K. Sissakian1,2, Nadhir Al-Ansari3, Nasrat Adamo4, Mukhalad Abdullah5 and Jan Laue6 Abstract Most of the Mesopotamian Plain is covered by Quaternary sediments among which the flood plain sediments of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers are the most dominant parts. Aeolian sediments; however, also cover considerable areas at different parts of the plain in forms of sand dunes, sand sheets and Nebkhas. The dunes are the most common form and they are creeping as well as sand sheets in vast areas causing desertification. The main reasons causing this is climate change, abandoning of agricultural areas. Salinization is another significant problem in the plain whereby the affected areas are growing in size and the concentration of the salt in the soil, as well as the groundwater is increasing rapidly. The increase in salinization is due to miss- management of water resources, and the increasing salinity of the surface and ground water which due to the use of irrigation water supplied from Al-Tharthar Depression (lake) and the Main Outfall Drain. Keywords: Desertification, Sand dunes, Groundwater, Salinization, Solonization. 1 Lecturer, University of Kurdistan Hewler. 2 Private Consultant Geologist, Erbil. 3 Professor, Water Resource Engineering, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden. 4 Consultant Dam Engineer, Sweden. 5 Private Engineer, Baghdad, Iraq. 6 Professor, Water Resource Engineering, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden. Article Info: Received: March 10, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • The Environment and the Tigris- Euphrates River System, 1988-2005
    Still the Fertile Crescent? The Environment and the Tigris- Euphrates River System, 1988-2005 ROBERT B AUER In January 1990, engineers in southeastern Turkey observed one of the most incredible events ever seen in that region of the world. The Euphrates River, a 1,900-mile unstoppable force of nature, ran up against an immovable object, the towering walls of Atatürk Dam. For an entire month, the dam stopped the flow of the Euphrates in its tracks while its waters filled a 817 square kilometer reservoir. Atatürk Dam formed the centerpiece of Turkey’s Guneydogu Anadolu Projesi (also known as the GAP Project or the Southeastern Anatolia Project), which was designed to bring irrigation water and hydroelectric power to its citizens living in the southeast. After spending $1.25 billion on the dam, the Turkish government was ready to see the returns.1 Turkey’s downstream neighbors, Syria and Iraq, were less than elated by the impoundment of so much water. The Syrians depended on the Tigris and Euphrates; they are the only major rivers within Syr- ian borders. While Turkey claimed to have fulfilled its water obligations to Syria (guaranteed unilaterally by Turkey in 1987), this was small con- solation to the Syrian farmers already dealing with drought conditions. For Iraq, whose water supply also depended in part on the Euphrates, Syria’s own Tabqa Dam compounded the problem. This structure, along with the GAP Project, combined to decrease the volume of wa- ter reaching Iraq from the Euphrates by 25 percent.2 1 John Cooley, “Middle East Water: Power and Peace” Middle East Policy 1 (no.
    [Show full text]
  • Euphrates-Tigris
    0 [Type here] Irrigation in Africa in figures - AQUASTAT Survey - 2016 Transboundary River Basin Overview – Euphrates-Tigris Version 2009 Recommended citation: FAO. 2009. AQUASTAT Transboundary River Basins – Euphrates-Tigris River Basin. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome, Italy The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licencerequest or addressed to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • The Intentional Destruction of Cultural Heritage in Iraq As a Violation Of
    The Intentional Destruction of Cultural Heritage in Iraq as a Violation of Human Rights Submission for the United Nations Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights About us RASHID International e.V. is a worldwide network of archaeologists, cultural heritage experts and professionals dedicated to safeguarding and promoting the cultural heritage of Iraq. We are committed to de eloping the histor! and archaeology of ancient "esopotamian cultures, for we belie e that knowledge of the past is ke! to understanding the present and to building a prosperous future. "uch of Iraq#s heritage is in danger of being lost fore er. "ilitant groups are ra$ing mosques and churches, smashing artifacts, bulldozing archaeological sites and illegall! trafficking antiquities at a rate rarel! seen in histor!. Iraqi cultural heritage is suffering grie ous and in man! cases irre ersible harm. To pre ent this from happening, we collect and share information, research and expert knowledge, work to raise public awareness and both de elop and execute strategies to protect heritage sites and other cultural propert! through international cooperation, advocac! and technical assistance. R&SHID International e.). Postfach ++, Institute for &ncient Near -astern &rcheology Ludwig-Maximilians/Uni ersit! of "unich 0eschwister-Scholl/*lat$ + (/,1234 "unich 0erman! https566www.rashid-international.org [email protected] Copyright This document is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution .! International license. 8ou are free to copy and redistribute the material in an! medium or format, remix, transform, and build upon the material for an! purpose, e en commerciall!. R&SHI( International e.). cannot re oke these freedoms as long as !ou follow the license terms.
    [Show full text]
  • The Waters of Euphrates and Tigris: an International Law Perspective
    The Waters of Euphrates and Tigris: An International Law Perspective A Study by Adele J. Kirschner and Katrin Tiroch* A. von Bogdandy and R. Wolfrum, (eds.), Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, Volume 16, 2012, p. 329-394. © 2012 Koninklijke Brill N.V. * This Study was written as part of the MPIL Global Knowledge Transfer project on “Water Conflicts in International Law” financed by the German Ministry of Foreign Affairs, see <www.mpil.de/red/water>. The authors would like to thank Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Rüdiger Wolfrum, Prof. Dr. Ulrich Beyerlin and Dr. Tilmann Röder for their invaluable comments on the article. Special thanks also go to Nicolas Bremer, Jie-Yoon Kim and David Reichwein for their kind assistance. 330 Max Planck UNYB 16 (2012) I. Introduction II. Geography, Climate and Hydrological Setting 1. Geography a. The Euphrates b. The Tigris 2. Climate 3. Hydrological Setting III. Utilization of the Rivers and Development Plans 1. Iraq 2. Syria 3. Turkey 4. Conclusion IV. Historical Overview on Water Politics in the Euphrates and Tigris Region 1. Developments before World War II 2. Developments after World War II V. International Law in the Euphrates and Tigris Region 1. International Water Law a. Introduction b. Equitable and Reasonable Utilization of an International Water- course c. Obligation not to Cause Harm d. Procedural Obligations e. Environmental Protection f. Groundwater g. Vital Human Needs h. Water Principles in Islamic Law 2. Bilateral Agreements a. Water Sharing Agreements before the 1990s aa. Turkey and Iraq bb. Syria and Turkey cc. Iraq and Syria b.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Sumerian City-States
    Name and Date: _________________________ Text: HISTORY ALIVE! The Ancient World 4.1 Introduction In Chapter 3, you learned how people began farming and living in small villages during Neolithic times. In this chapter, you’ll discover how some small villages grew into large, complex cities. These villages were located in a land of rolling hills and low plains called Mesopotamia (modern-day Iraq). Mesopotamia is a Greek word that means “the land between the rivers.” The two rivers are the Tigris River and the Euphrates River. Cities first appeared in the southern part of this land, an area called Sumer. The earliest cities in Sumer date back to about 3500 B.C.E. These first cities were like small, independent countries. They each had their own ruler and their own farmland to provide food. For this reason, they are called city-states. These ruins in the Syrian Desert reveal an ancient Sumerian walled city. Imagine that you are visiting one of these early cities. You see a walled settlement surrounded by farmland that supplies food for the city. The strong city walls are built of sunbaked bricks. Moats, or ditches filled with water, surround the walls. The moats help to keep out enemies. During an attack, people living outside the city walls fled inside for protection. As you gaze on the city, you may wonder how it came to be built. Why didn’t people in Mesopotamia go on living in small villages, as their ancestors had done for thousands of years? Why did large city-states grow up here, in the “Land Between the Rivers”? In this chapter, you’ll find out.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecocide and Renewal in Iraq's Marshlands
    Ending the Silence BY TOVA FLEMING & DR. MICHELLE ST EVEN S Photo of wild hogs in foreground and reed dwellings in the distance by Nik Wheeler Photo of wild hogs in foreground and reed dwellings the distance by Nik Ecocide and Renewal in Iraq’s Mashlands oisy fans carve paths of relief through the hot dominate the majority of images, women in black wail thick midsummer air of a classroom at the in grief, men scream into cameras, and children stare University of Barcelona. Small paper make- with eyes that appear much older than their years. shift fans flutter like migrating butterflies The intellectual blackout imposed by the Baathist re- Nacross the rows of tables as thirteen Iraqi scientists from gime, in combination with the Western media’s portray- the Basra Marine Science Center, University of Basra, al of the Middle East, obscures a vibrant and passionate Iraq, prepare to present their research on the Mesopota- people with a rich cultural and ecological history as well mian Marshes, Shatt al Arab River, and Gulf to a group as an ecological crisis of tragic proportions occurring of international peers who have convened at the World throughout the Tigris and Euphrates watersheds. The Congress for Middle Eastern Studies, July, 2010. media distortion also conceals the people trying to save This is the first time these scientists have had a chance the Tigris, Euphrates, and Mesopotamian Marshes. to present their research to an international audience. Surrounded by desert to the west and south, the Tigris “Scientists in Iraq have been living in a blackout for thir- and Euphrates Rivers bring life to the Mesopotamian re- ty years because of the gion, and an abundance dictatorship.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Scarcity and Conflict in the Euphrates-Tigris River Basin Samantha Glass SIT Study Abroad
    SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad SIT Digital Collections Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection SIT Study Abroad Spring 2017 Twisting the Tap: Water Scarcity and Conflict in the Euphrates-Tigris River Basin Samantha Glass SIT Study Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection Part of the International Relations Commons, Near and Middle Eastern Studies Commons, and the Other Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Glass, Samantha, "Twisting the Tap: Water Scarcity and Conflict in the Euphrates-Tigris River Basin" (2017). Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection. 2594. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/2594 This Unpublished Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the SIT Study Abroad at SIT Digital Collections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection by an authorized administrator of SIT Digital Collections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Twisting the Tap: Water Scarcity and Conflict in the Euphrates-Tigris River Basin Samantha Taylor Glass Spring 2017 SIT Study Abroad: International Studies and Multilateral Diplomacy Dr. Heikki S. Mattila Dr. Gyula Csurgai Yale University Global Affairs GLASS, Spring 2017 1 ABSTRACT Is water a target or an instrument of violence? Is it an amplifier of conflict or a means for cooperation, a source of growth or a force of destruction? The purpose of this report is to determine how threats of water shortage and the lack of a trans-boundary management plan has prompted states in the Euphrates-Tigris River Basin to leverage the shared resource as a political weapon to preserve national interests and ascertain regional authority.
    [Show full text]