Elected Officials 2016
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012
Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012 Jennifer E. Manning Information Research Specialist Colleen J. Shogan Deputy Director and Senior Specialist November 26, 2012 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL30261 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Women in the United States Congress: 1917-2012 Summary Ninety-four women currently serve in the 112th Congress: 77 in the House (53 Democrats and 24 Republicans) and 17 in the Senate (12 Democrats and 5 Republicans). Ninety-two women were initially sworn in to the 112th Congress, two women Democratic House Members have since resigned, and four others have been elected. This number (94) is lower than the record number of 95 women who were initially elected to the 111th Congress. The first woman elected to Congress was Representative Jeannette Rankin (R-MT, 1917-1919, 1941-1943). The first woman to serve in the Senate was Rebecca Latimer Felton (D-GA). She was appointed in 1922 and served for only one day. A total of 278 women have served in Congress, 178 Democrats and 100 Republicans. Of these women, 239 (153 Democrats, 86 Republicans) have served only in the House of Representatives; 31 (19 Democrats, 12 Republicans) have served only in the Senate; and 8 (6 Democrats, 2 Republicans) have served in both houses. These figures include one non-voting Delegate each from Guam, Hawaii, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Currently serving Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) holds the record for length of service by a woman in Congress with 35 years (10 of which were spent in the House). -
PPIC Statewide Survey: Californians and Their Government
PPICPPIC STATEWIDESTATEWIDE SURVEYSURVEY FEBRU ARY 2004 Californians and Their Government ○○○○○ Mark Baldassare Research Director & Survey Director Public Policy Institute of California The Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) is a private operating foundation established in 1994 with an endowment from William R. Hewlett. The Institute is dedicated to improving public policy in California through independent, objective, nonpartisan research. PPIC’s research agenda focuses on three program areas: population, economy, and governance and public finance. Studies within these programs are examining the underlying forces shaping California’s future, cutting across a wide range of public policy concerns, including education, health care, immigration, income distribution, welfare, urban growth, and state and local finance. PPIC was created because three concerned citizens – William R. Hewlett, Roger W. Heyns, and Arjay Miller – recognized the need for linking objective research to the realities of California public policy. Their goal was to help the state’s leaders better understand the intricacies and implications of contemporary issues and make informed public policy decisions when confronted with challenges in the future. PPIC does not take or support positions on any ballot measure or on any local, state, or federal legislation, nor does it endorse, support, or oppose any political parties or candidates for public office. David W. Lyon is founding President and Chief Executive Officer of PPIC. Raymond L. Watson is Chairman of the Board of Directors. 500 Washington Street, Suite 800 • San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 291-4400 • Fax: (415) 291-4401 [email protected] • www.ppic.org Preface The PPIC Statewide Survey series provides policymakers, the media, and the general public with objective, advocacy-free information on the perceptions, opinions, and public policy preferences of California residents. -
Congressional Record—Senate S7020
S7020 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE December 9, 2016 While BARBARA’s departure leaves diction, helping Congress to pass the term limit pledge he had made to his the Senate without one of its strongest Comprehensive Addiction and Recov- Hoosier constituents and did not run champions for the environment, col- ery Act, CARA, to improve prevention for reelection to the Senate. lege affordability, and reproductive and treatment, support those in recov- For many people, 18 years in Con- rights, we will continue to fight for ery, and ensure first responders have gress might be enough, but Senator these core priorities as she would have the tools they need. She helped to pass COATS was just getting started. After done. legislation to reauthorize the Violence he left the Senate, he joined the pres- It has been a privilege to serve along- Against Women Act, crack down on tigious law firm of Verner, Liipfert, side a steadfast champion like BAR- sexual assault in the military, make Bernhard, McPherson and Hand. In BARA. college campuses safer, and improve 2001, then-President Bush nominated She has served Maryland with utter mental health first aid training and Senator COATS to be Ambassador to the conviction, and I know she will con- suicide prevention programs. Federal Republic of Germany. He ar- tinue to be a progressive force in this Senator AYOTTE has followed in the rived in Germany just 3 days before the new chapter of her life. footsteps of other Republican Senators September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Aloha, BARBARA, and a hui hou, from New England, such as Robert In the aftermath of 9/11, Ambassador ‘‘until we meet again.’’ Stafford of Vermont and John Chafee Coats established excellent relations f of Rhode Island, who are true conserv- with then-opposition leader and future TRIBUTES TO DEPARTING atives when it comes to the environ- German Chancellor Angela Merkel—a SENATORS ment. -
View the Report Here
How California’s Congressional Delegation Voted on Immigration Reform ca. 1986 As the comprehensive immigration reform effort moves forward in Congress, how did California’s congressional delegation vote on the last major reform legislation – the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986? Forward Observer reviewed the Congressional Record and media reports from the summer and fall of 1986. The final bill, known as Simpson-Mazzoli, passed the Senate by a vote of 63 to 24 and passed the House by a vote of 238 to 173. It was signed into law by President Reagan on November 6, 1986. Of the 47 members of the California delegation, 33 voted in favor of the final bill and 13 voted against it (and one member did not vote): Democrats voted in favor 19-9. Republicans voted in favor 14-4 with Rep. Badham not voting. Twice as many Democrats (9) as Republicans (4) voted against the final bill, but majorities of both parties supported the comprehensive package (68% of Democrats; 78% of Republicans). Only three members who served in Congress at the time remain in office. Two voted for the bill – Rep. George Miller (D-11) and Rep. Henry Waxman (D-33). Sen. Barbara Boxer, then representing the state’s 6th district as a Representative, voted against. The key elements of Simpson-Mazzoli required employers to attest to their employee’s immigration status, made it illegal to hire unauthorized immigrants, legalized certain agricultural illegal immigrants, and legalized illegal immigrants who entered the United States before January 1, 1982, after paying a fine and back taxes. -
Congressional Directory CALIFORNIA
18 Congressional Directory CALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA (Population 1998, 32,667,000) SENATORS DIANNE FEINSTEIN, Democrat, of San Francisco, CA; born June 22, 1933 in San Fran- cisco; B.A., Stanford University, 1955; elected to San Francisco Board of Supervisors, 1970± 78; president of Board of Supervisors: 1970±71, 1974±75, 1978; mayor of San Francisco, 1978± 88; candidate for governor of California, 1990. Recipient: Distinguished Woman Award, San Francisco Examiner; Achievement Award, Business and Professional Women's Club, 1970; Golden Gate University, California, LL.D. (hon.), 1979; SCOPUS Award for Outstanding Public Service, American Friends of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem; University of Santa Clara, D.P.S. (hon.); University of Manila, D.P.A. (hon.), 1981; Antioch University, LL.D. (hon.), 1983; Los Angeles Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith's Distinguished Service Award, 1984; French Legion d'Honneur from President Mitterand, 1984; Mills College, LL.D. (hon.), 1985; U.S. Army's Commander's Award for Public Service, 1986; Brotherhood/Sisterhood Award, National Conference of Christians and Jews, 1986; Paulist Fathers Award, 1987; Epis- copal Church Award for Service, 1987; U.S. Navy Distinguished Civilian Award, 1987; Silver Spur Award for Outstanding Public Service, San Francisco Planning and Urban Renewal Asso- ciation, 1987; ``All Pro Management Team Award'' for No. 1 Mayor, City and State Magazine, 1987; Community Service Award Honoree for Public Service, 1987; American Jewish Congress, 1987; President's Award, St. Ignatius High School, San Francisco, 1988; Coro Investment in Leadership Award, 1988; President's Medal, University of California at San Francisco, 1988; University of San Francisco, D.H.L. -
Level of Activity
2013 and 2014 ELECTION CYCLE – COMMITTEES QUALIFIED FOR RANDOM DRAW First Round of Random Draws includes both Candidate Committees and Primarily Formed Committees Supporting / Opposing a Candidate A B C CANDIDATE COMMITTEE Treasurer ID # $10,000- $50,000- $100,000 or $49,999 $99,999 more Myrtle Cole for City Council 2013 Rita Copeland 1354342 X Cate for Council 2014 C. April Boling 1356881 X Lorie Zapf for City Council 2014 C. April Boling 1357726 X Carol Kim for City Council 2014 Nancy R. Haley 1359070 X Sarah Boot for City Council 2014 Gary Crummitt 1359642 X Fletcher for Mayor 2013 Nancy R. Haley 1359831 X Faulconer for Mayor 2013/2014 C. April Boling 1360150 X David Alvarez for Mayor 2013 Rita Copeland 1360332 X San Diegans to Protect Jobs & the X Economy, Supporting Kevin Faulconer C. April Boling 1360473 for Mayor 2013 Restoring Trust in San Diego- A X Committee to Support Nathan Fletcher Shaunda Peane 1360475 for Mayor 2013 Neighborhoods For Nathan Fletcher- A committee to Support Nathan Fletcher David Gould 1361479 X for Mayor Working Families for a Better San Diego X to Support David Alvarez for Mayor 2013, Sponsored by the San Diego & Richard Barrera 1360499 Imperial Counties Labor Council, AFL- CIO Working Together for Neighborhood X Fairness, in opposition to David Alvarez C. April Boling 1362467 for Mayor 2014, Sponsored by the Lincoln Club of San Diego County Coalition of Coastal Communities for X C. April Boling 1365567 Lorie Zapf for Council 2014 Neighborhood Coalition Supporting Chris X Cate for Council 2014 sponsored by the C. -
Draft Environmental Assessment and Land Protection Plan Proposed South San Diego Bay Unit, San Diego National Wildlife Refuge U.S
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Draft Environmental Assessment and Land Protection Plan Proposed South San Diego Bay Unit, San Diego National Wildlife Refuge U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Draft Environmental Assessment and Land Protection Plan Proposed South San Diego Bay Unit, San Diego National Wildlife Refuge Prepared by U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 911 N.E. 11th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97232-4181 January 1998 This is the legacy I would like to leave behind: I would like to have stopped the ridicule about the conservation of snails, lichens, and fungi, and instead move the debate to which ecosystems are the most recoverable and how we can save them, making room for them and ourselves. Mollie H. Beattie, Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1993-1996 Cover: California least terns, Kendal Morris TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1. PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR ACTION ..............................1 1.1 Introduction .......................................................1 1.2 Proposed Action ...................................................3 1.3 Need for the Proposed Action .........................................4 1.4 Purpose of the Proposed Action .......................................4 1.5 Background .......................................................4 1.6 Project Area ......................................................6 1.7 Decisions To Be Made ...............................................7 1.8 Issue Identification ..................................................7 1.8.1 Issue Identification Process ....................................7 -
Qualcomm Incorporated
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED DISCLOSURES UNDER POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND EXPENDITURES POLICY FISCAL YEAR 2012 (SEPTEMBER 26, 2011 - SEPTEMBER 30, 2012) (AMOUNTS PAID IN FISCAL YEAR 2012) STATE AND LOCAL POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS CALIFORNIA AMOUNT BILL BERRYHILL FOR SENATE 2012 $ 1,000 BOB BLUMENFIELD FOR ASSEMBLY 2012 $ 1,000 BOB WIECKOWSKI FOR ASSEMBLY 2012 $ 1,000 BRIAN JONES FOR ASSEMBLY 2012 $ 1,000 BUCHANAN FOR ASSEMBLY 2012 $ 1,000 CALIFORNIANS FOR JOBS AND A STRONG ECONOMY $ 5,000 CANELLA FOR SENATE 2014 $ 2,000 CAROL LIU FOR SENATE 2012 $ 1,000 COMPREHENSIVE PENSION REFORM FOR SAN DIEGO $ 30,000 CONNIE CONWAY FOR ASSEMBLY 2012 $ 2,000 DE SAULNIER FOR SENATE 2012 $ 1,000 DR. ED HERNANDEZ, O.D. DEMOCRAT FOR SENATE 2014 $ 1,000 HARKEY FOR ASSEMBLY 2012 $ 1,000 JEAN FULLER FOR SENATE 2014 $ 1,000 JOHN A. PEREZ FOR ASSEMBLY 2012 $ 3,000 KEVIN DE LEON FOR SENATE 2014 $ 1,000 MANUEL PEREZ FOR ASSEMBLY 2012 $ 1,000 MARTY BLOCK FOR STATE SENATE 2012 $ 2,000 NESTANDE FOR ASSEMBLY 2012 $ 1,000 PEREA FOR ASSEMBLY 2012 $ 1,000 PLESCIA FOR SENATE 2012 $ 2,000 REELECT BILL EMMERSON FOR SENATE 2012 $ 1,000 RUBIO FOR STATE SENATE 2014 $ 1,000 STEINBERG FOR LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR 2018 $ 3,000 TAX FIGHTERS FOR ANDERSON SENATE 2014 $ 1,000 TAXPAYERS FOR BOB HUFF FOR SENATE 2012 $ 1,000 TECHAMERICA PAC $ 5,000 TOM HARMAN FOR BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 2014 $ 1,000 TONI ATKINS FOR STATE ASSEMBLY 2012 $ 2,000 VALADAO FOR ASSEMBLY 2012 $ 1,000 WAGNER FOR ASSEMBLY 2012 $ 1,000 WOLK FOR SENATE 2012 $ 1,000 $ 78,000 OTHER STATES AMOUNT NONE $ - FEDERAL PAC CONTRIBUTIONS (QPAC) AMOUNT ALLYSON SCHWARTZ FOR CONGRESS $ 1,000 ANNA ESHOO FOR CONGRESS $ 1,000 ANNA ESHOO FOR CONGRESS $ 1,000 ANNA ESHOO FOR CONGRESS $ 1,000 ANNA ESHOO FOR CONGRESS $ 1,000 ANNA ESHOO FOR CONGRESS $ 1,000 BASS VICTORY COMMITTEE $ 1,000 BECERRA FOR CONGRESS $ 1,000 BILL NELSON FOR US SENATE $ 1,000 BOB CASEY FOR SENATE INC. -
Vital Statistics on Congress 2001-2002
Vital Statistics on Congress 2001-2002 Vital Statistics on Congress 2001-2002 NormanJ. Ornstein American Enterprise Institute Thomas E. Mann Brookings Institution Michael J. Malbin State University of New York at Albany The AEI Press Publisher for the American Enterprise Institute WASHINGTON, D.C. 2002 Distributed to the Trade by National Book Network, 152.00 NBN Way, Blue Ridge Summit, PA 172.14. To order call toll free 1-800-462.-642.0 or 1-717-794-3800. For all other inquiries please contact the AEI Press, 1150 Seventeenth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 2.0036 or call 1-800-862.-5801. Available in the United States from the AEI Press, do Publisher Resources Inc., 1224 Heil Quaker Blvd., P O. Box 7001, La Vergne, TN 37086-7001. To order, call toll free: 1-800-937-5557. Distributed outside the United States by arrangement with Eurospan, 3 Henrietta Street, London WC2E 8LU, England. ISBN 0-8447-4167-1 (cloth: alk. paper) ISBN 0-8447-4168-X (pbk.: alk. paper) 13579108642 © 2002 by the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, D.C. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be used or reproduced in any manner whatsoever without permission in writing from the American Enterprise Institute except in the case of brief quotations embodied in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. The views expressed in the publications of the American Enterprise Institute are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff, advisory panels, officers, or trustees of AEI. Printed in the United States ofAmerica Contents List of Figures and Tables vii Preface ............................................ -
List by State 2-27
2012 Political Contributions Report March 2013 A Message from Rich Bagger, Chairman, Celgene PAC I am pleased to share Celgene’s first political contributions report, which includes a listing of candidates and political committees supported by either the Celgene Corporation Political Action Committee (Celgene PAC) or Celgene Corporation during 2012. Beginning this year, we will issue political contribution reports twice a year, during the quarter following the end of each half of the year. Celgene established the Celgene PAC in March 2012. The Celgene PAC is a volunteer, nonpartisan, employee-run organization that provides opportunities for eligible employees to participate in the American political process. The Celgene PAC supports and contributes to candidates from both political parties who share our commitment to these core principles of access and innovation in health care: • Expanding access to medicines through a competitive marketplace and a regulatory environment in which innovation can flourish • Protecting the patient-physician relationship and ensuring patient access to innovative treatments • Recognizing the important role of biopharmaceutical companies and their employees in the ecosystem of innovation in health care The Celgene PAC Board of Directors, which is comprised of Celgene employees, meets monthly to consider recommendations for PAC support and approve all contributions to candidates and political committees. The Celgene PAC Board also reviews and approves any political contributions made by Celgene Corporation in states and to entities where contributions with corporate funds are permitted. During 2012, we supported 34 candidates from both political parties at the Federal and State levels. I hope you will take a few moments to review this report and see which candidates the Celgene PAC supported in your state. -
Most Influential: Kevin Faulconer ... and the Rest of the List
» Newsletter SignUp About Advertising Contact Enter your email... Subscribe Most Influential: Kevin Faulconer ... And the rest of the list Our City is ending our list of San Diego's 20 Most Influential people with new Mayor Kevin Faulconer. He has become San Diego's Most Influential person. When we began compiling this list back at the end of 2013, the race to replace disgraced former Mayor Bob Filner was ongoing and it was unknown who would be leading the city. Now, of course, we know. Faulconer won easily over his opponent, freshman Council member David Alvarez. Faulconer won, but the honor brings its share of hurdles. First is continuing the work that interim Mayor Todd Gloria started, which is to bring stability and honor back to the office. Secondly, it is to lead the nation's eighth largest city at a time when many challenges face it, such as infrastructure woes, homelessness, a shortage of affordable housing, income inequality … Faulconer has stepped quickly into his new role. He's already spearheaded a number of initiatives to improve San Diego's neighborhoods, increase library and rec center hours and beef up public safety. He named Shelley Zimmerman as police chief, the first women in San Diego to hold that post. When the recent wildfires hit, he offered a calm and measured presence. His influence may well go beyond San Diego as well. He's the only Republican mayor of a major U.S. city. Other Republican politicians may look to his rise as a blueprint to achieve similar success. Recent Highlights He did so by taking a moderate approach on social issues. -
1 Redistricting and Congressional Control Following the 2012 Election
Redistricting and Congressional Control Following the 2012 Election By Sundeep Iyer On Election Day, Republicans maintained control of the House of Representatives. While two Congressional races remain undecided as of November 20, it appears that Democrats may have picked up about eight seats during the 2012 election,1 falling well short of the 25 seats Democrats needed to take back control of the House. Before the election, the Brennan Center estimated that redistricting would allow Republicans to maintain long-term control of 11 more seats in the House than they would have under the previous district lines.2 Now that the election is complete, it is worth re-examining the influence of redistricting on the results of the 2012 election. This brief assesses how the new district lines affected the partisan balance of power in the House. The report is the prologue to more extensive analyses, which will examine other aspects of redistricting, including the fairness of the process and its effect on minority representation, among others. Based on our initial analysis of the 2012 election, several important trends emerge: • Redistricting may have changed which party won the election in at least 25 House districts. Because of redistricting, it is likely that the GOP won about six more seats overall in 2012 than they would have under the old district lines. • Where Republicans controlled redistricting, the GOP likely won 11 more seats than they would have under the old district lines, including five seats previously held by Democrats. Democrats also used redistricting to their advantage, but Republicans redrew the lines for four times as many districts as Democrats.