Solar Two Demonstrates Clean Power for the Future

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Solar Two Demonstrates Clean Power for the Future SunsLab SnapShot Solar Two Demonstrates Clean Power for the Future The 10-megawatt Solar Two power tower pilot plant near Barstow, California, successfully completed operations in April 1999, having met essentially all of its objectives. It demon- strated the ability to collect and store solar energy efficiently and to generate electricity when needed by the utility and its customers. Based on the success of Solar Two, U.S. industry is actively planning the first commercial implementation of this technology. Solar Two represents a new generation of the initial high cost and risk of commer- solar energy technology, capable of producing cializing a new technology. The proposed clean, cost-effective, dispatchable electric Spanish project, ÒSolar Tres,Ó would use all power on a very large scale, without harmful the proven molten-salt technology of Solar pollutants or carbon emissions. Solar Two was Two, scaled up by a factor of three. Boeing, conceived and built on the site of its predeces- Bechtel, and their Spanish partners are currently sor, Solar One, by a consortium of U.S. investigating design options, preparing cost utilities and industry and the Department of estimates, and negotiating contract opportunities Energy (DOE). Over its three years of for a project start in 2000. operation, Solar Two achieved its overall goal While Solar Two was a demonstration of demonstrating advanced molten-salt power project, Solar Tres will be financed and built by tower technology developed over the past industry (with no DOE cost-share) as a money- decade at a scale sufficient to allow follow-on making venture. U.S. industry views this commercialization of the technology. Plant project as a springboard to near-term opportuni- operations successfully proved that solar energy ties for numerous full-scale (greater than 50 could be collected efficiently over a broad megawatts) commercial power tower plants in range of operating conditions and that the low- Spain, in other worldwide markets, and eventu- cost energy storage system operated reliably and ally in the U.S. Southwest. This dispatchable, efficiently. This unique storage capability utility-scale solar power could be a major allowed solar energy to be collected when the source of clean energy worldwide, offsetting as sun was shining and high-value, dispatchable much as 4 million metric tonnes of carbon electric power to be generated at night or when- equivalent (MMTCE) over the next 10 years. ever demanded by the utility, even when the sun was not shining. Still, much remains to be done. The risks of a large, capital-intensive plant demonstrating The next step... new technology remain high. With all the In addition to validating the design and lessons learned from Solar Two, DOEÕs technical characteristics of molten-salt receiver Concentrating Solar Power Program can play a and storage technology, Solar Two has also vital role in providing the solar experience and been successful in fostering commercial expertise of SunsLab (Sandia National interest in power towers. Two of the projectÕs Laboratories and the National Renewable key industry partners, the Boeing Company Energy Laboratory working together) to the and Bechtel Corporation, are currently pur- Solar Tres consortium. An active partnership suing commercial solar power tower plant with U.S. industry will be critically important opportunities in Spain. Solar energy premiums in assuring the success of this exciting renew- and other incentives under review in Spain able energy option. Among other things, Solar Concentrating create an attractive market opportunity, provid- Two demonstrated the success that such a Solar Power ing the economic incentives needed to mitigate DOE/industry partnership can bring. Program In the beginning... The major challenges facing researchers in making the The Solar Two story really began when the United concept work were first to develop very large mirrors that States became interested in alternatives to imported oil in could accurately focus sunlight on the receiver as the sun the late 1970s as the global political situation threatened moves across the sky. The receiver had to be able to han- our energy supply. At that time, the DOE asked its national dle the high solar fluxes (up to 1000 times the intensity of laboratories to explore sources of renewable energy, normal sunlight) and temperatures up to 565¼C. The heat including innovative ideas for harvesting the power of the then had to be stored to generate steam when power was sun, the wind, and the heat of the earth. In the area of needed. Testing at the NSTTF proved the concept was solar energy, the power tower concept was developed. possible. For Solar One, water was chosen as the heat-transport Solar One is Born medium. The idea was to pump water up to the Engineers at Sandia National Laboratories in receiver to make steam, which was then brought Albuquerque, New Mexico, and Livermore, California, down to the base of the tower to generate studied this power tower concept and determined that the electricity or to thermally charge an enormous system held promise to generate electricity on a scale holding tank containing oil, rock, and sand. large enough to power entire cities. They proposed a test facility to investigate the concept and qualify components By 1982, Solar One was ready to go into oper- and systems for larger-scale evaluation at a pilot plant. As ationÑwith its field of 1,818 heliostats encircling a result, the National Solar Thermal Test Facility (NSTTF) and facing a tower rising 90 meters into the air and was built at Sandia in Albuquerque in 1976, followed soon rated to produce 10 megawatts of power. The plant after by the 10-megawatt Solar One pilot plant near operated successfully until 1988, as planned, proving Barstow, California. that power towers can produce electricity efficiently and reliably, operating with 96% availability during its final year. It generated more than 38,000 megawatt-hours during its lifetime and consistently ran at its 10-megawatt rating. Solar One did have deficiencies, however, including inefficiencies in its storage system and difficulties operating under intermittent cloud cover. Solar One Begets Solar Two Like the legendary phoenix, the idea for Solar Two (tower and receiver at right) arose from Solar One. This time, it was a matter of making improvements to a known and proven conceptÑ and retrofitting the original plant to incorporate the Storage is the key to molten-salt power towers. These two improvements. Although the water/steam receiver tanks provide three full hours of storage at Solar Two. concept worked, researchers knew that certain salts when melted could store the heat much more efficiently and cost-effectively. Thus, use of a large storage system would not only increase the value of The National Solar Thermal Test Facility produced power, but would actually decrease the At the NSTTF, built at Sandia National Laboratories overall cost as well. Much of the equipment at in Albuquerque in 1976, the 63-meter tall tower has Solar One, including the large heliostat field, tower, 222 computer-controlled heliostats that can direct the and turbine, was reused, but a new receiver, storage sun into any of four test bays to produce a total system, control system, and connecting piping were thermal capacity of 5 megawatts. The facility has been required. The DOE and a consortium of utility and used for six major industry partners (see back page) shared the costs power tower of the Solar Two effort. development The engineering, manufacturing, and construction programs, including of Solar Two lasted from 1992 into 1995, with development and initial startup and testing beginning in 1996. Solar qualification testing Two operated from April 1996 to April 1999, of the molten-salt when operations were completed, after having technology used at proven the promise of the concept. Solar Two. Solar Two Performance... Molten-Salt Power Tower The Bottom Line Technology Solar TwoÕs overall goal was to demonstrate advanced In a molten-salt power tower, sun-tracking heliostats can molten-salt power tower technology. To this end, its concentrate solar energy up to 1000 times onto a central, design objectives, developed early in the project, were to: tower-mounted receiver. Molten nitrate salt, which is a ¥ Simulate the design, construction, and operation of the clear liquid with properties like water at temperatures above its 240¡C melting point, is pumped from a large storage first commercial plants. tank to the receiver, where it is heated in tubes to temper- ¥ Validate the technical characteristics of a molten-salt atures of 565¡C. The salt is then returned to a second large plant. storage tank, where it remains until needed by the utility for ¥ Improve the accuracy of economic projections for com- power generation. At that time, the salt is pumped through mercial projects by increasing the database of system per- a steam generator to produce the steam to power a conven- tional, high-efficiency steam turbine to produce electricity. formance, and capital, operating, and maintenance The salt at 285¡C then returns to the first storage tank to be costs. used in the cycle again. ¥ Collect, evaluate, and distribute information to foster interest in commercialization of power towers. ¥ Stimulate interest in forming a commercial consortium. All of these objectives were successfully met during the project. Over its three-year operating lifetime, daily operation of Solar Two became relatively routine, with various performance records broken on a fairly regular basis. Key attributes of solar power tower plants, including efficient collection and storage of the sunÕs energy and dispatch of electricity as needed by the utility grid, were confirmed. Specific technical accomplishments included demonstra- The Dispatchability Advantage tion of: The major advantage of Solar Two is that the plant can produce power when the local utility needs it mostÑ ¥ Dispatchability: Using its unique and extremely during peak demand periods in the afternoon and early efficient thermal storage system, Solar Two delivered evening, for example.
Recommended publications
  • Loddon Mallee Renewable Energy Roadmap
    Loddon Mallee Region Renewable Energy Roadmap Loddon Mallee Renewable Energy Roadmap Foreword On behalf of the Victorian Government, I am pleased to present the Victorian Regional Renewable Energy Roadmaps. As we transition to cleaner energy with new opportunities for jobs and greater security of supply, we are looking to empower communities, accelerate renewable energy and build a more sustainable and prosperous state. Victoria is leading the way to meet the challenges of climate change by enshrining our Victorian Renewable Energy Targets (VRET) into law: 25 per cent by 2020, rising to 40 per cent by 2025 and 50 per cent by 2030. Achieving the 2030 target is expected to boost the Victorian economy by $5.8 billion - driving metro, regional and rural industry and supply chain development. It will create around 4,000 full time jobs a year and cut power costs. It will also give the renewable energy sector the confidence it needs to invest in renewable projects and help Victorians take control of their energy needs. Communities across Barwon South West, Gippsland, Grampians and Loddon Mallee have been involved in discussions to help define how Victoria transitions to a renewable energy economy. These Roadmaps articulate our regional communities’ vision for a renewable energy future, identify opportunities to attract investment and better understand their community’s engagement and capacity to transition to renewable energy. Each Roadmap has developed individual regional renewable energy strategies to provide intelligence to business, industry and communities seeking to establish or expand new energy technology development, manufacturing or renewable energy generation in Victoria. The scale of change will be significant, but so will the opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Concentrating Solar Power: Energy from Mirrors
    DOE/GO-102001-1147 FS 128 March 2001 Concentrating Solar Power: Energy from Mirrors Mirror mirror on the wall, what's the The southwestern United States is focus- greatest energy source of all? The sun. ing on concentrating solar energy because Enough energy from the sun falls on the it's one of the world's best areas for sun- Earth everyday to power our homes and light. The Southwest receives up to twice businesses for almost 30 years. Yet we've the sunlight as other regions in the coun- only just begun to tap its potential. You try. This abundance of solar energy makes may have heard about solar electric power concentrating solar power plants an attrac- to light homes or solar thermal power tive alternative to traditional power plants, used to heat water, but did you know there which burn polluting fossil fuels such as is such a thing as solar thermal-electric oil and coal. Fossil fuels also must be power? Electric utility companies are continually purchased and refined to use. using mirrors to concentrate heat from the sun to produce environmentally friendly Unlike traditional power plants, concen- electricity for cities, especially in the trating solar power systems provide an southwestern United States. environmentally benign source of energy, produce virtually no emissions, and con- Photo by Hugh Reilly, Sandia National Laboratories/PIX02186 Photo by Hugh Reilly, This concentrating solar power tower system — known as Solar Two — near Barstow, California, is the world’s largest central receiver plant. This document was produced for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), a DOE national laboratory.
    [Show full text]
  • Abengoa Solar Develops and Applies Solar Energy Technologies in Order
    Solar Abengoa Solar develops and applies solar energy technologies in order to combat climate change and ensure sustainability through the use of its own Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) and photovoltaic technologies. www.abengoasolar.com Solar International Presence Spain China U.S.A. Morocco Algeria 34 Activity Report 08 Solar Our business Abengoa is convinced that solar energy combines the characteristics needed to resolve, to a significant extent, our society’s need for clean and efficient energy sources. Each year, the sun casts down on the earth an amount of energy that surpasses the energy needs of our planet many times over, and there are proven commercial technologies available today with the capability of harnessing this energy in an efficient way. Abengoa Solar’s mission is to contribute to meeting an increasingly higher percentage of our society’s energy needs through solar- based energy. To this end, Abengoa Solar works with the two chief solar technologies in existence today. First, it employs Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) technology in capturing the direct radiation from the sun to generate steam and drive a conventional turbine or to use this energy directly in industrial processes, usually in major electrical power grid-connected plants. Secondly, Abengoa Solar works with photovoltaic technologies that employ the sun’s energy for direct electrical power generation, thanks to the use of materials based on the so-called photovoltaic effect. Abengoa Solar works with these technologies in four basic lines of activity. The first encompasses promotion, construction and operation of CSP plants, Abengoa Solar currently designs, builds and operates efficient and reliable central receiver systems (tower and heliostats) and storage or non-storage-equipped parabolic trough collectors, as well as customized industrial installations for producing heat and electricity.
    [Show full text]
  • A Heliostat Field Control System
    A Heliostat Field Control System by Karel Johan Malan Dissertation presented for the degree of Master of Engineering in the Faculty of Engineering at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Mr Paul Gauché Co-supervisor: Mr Johann Treurnicht April 2014 Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the owner of the copyright thereof (unless to the extent explicitly otherwise stated) and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Date: ……………………………. Copyright © 2014 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved i Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract The ability of concentrating solar power (CSP) to efficiently store large amounts of energy sets it apart from other renewable energy technologies. However, cost reduction and improved efficiency is required for it to become more economically viable. Significant cost reduction opportunities exist, especially for central receiver system (CRS) technology where the heliostat field makes up 40 to 50 per cent of the total capital expenditure. CRS plants use heliostats to reflect sunlight onto a central receiver. Heliostats with high tracking accuracy are required to realize high solar concentration ratios. This enables high working temperatures for efficient energy conversion. Tracking errors occur mainly due to heliostat manufacturing-, installation- and alignment tolerances, but high tolerance requirements generally increase cost. A way is therefore needed to improve tracking accuracy without increasing tolerance requirements. The primary objective of this project is to develop a heliostat field control system within the context of a 5MWe CRS pilot plant.
    [Show full text]
  • Concentrating Solar Power Tower: Latest Status 3 Report and Survey of Development Trends
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 17 November 2017 doi:10.20944/preprints201710.0027.v2 1 Review 2 Concentrating Solar Power Tower: Latest Status 3 Report and Survey of Development Trends 4 Albert Boretti 1,*, Stefania Castelletto 2 and Sarim Al-Zubaidy 3 5 1 Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (MAE), Benjamin M. Statler College of 6 Engineering and Mineral Resources, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, United States, 7 [email protected]; [email protected] 8 2 School of Engineering, RMIT University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia; [email protected] 9 3 The University of Trinidad and Tobago, Trinidad and Tobago; [email protected] 10 * Correspondence: [email protected]; [email protected] 11 Abstract: The paper examines design and operating data of current concentrated solar power (CSP) 12 solar tower (ST) plants. The study includes CSP with or without boost by combustion of natural gas 13 (NG), and with or without thermal energy storage (TES). The latest, actual specific costs per 14 installed capacity are very high, 6085 $/kW for Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System (ISEGS) 15 with no TES, and 9227 $/kW for Crescent Dunes with TES. The actual production of electricity is 16 very low and much less than the expected. The actual capacity factors are 22% for ISEGS, despite 17 combustion of a significant amount of NG largely exceeding the planned values, and 13% for 18 Crescent Dunes. The design values were 33% and 52%. The study then reviews the proposed 19 technology updates to produce better ratio of solar field power to electric power, better capacity 20 factor, better matching of production and demand, lower plant’s cost, improved reliability and 21 increased life span of plant’s components.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Power Tower Technology: Large Scale Storable & Dispatchable Solar Energy Michael Mcdowell Rocketdyne Program Manager
    Solar Power Tower Technology: Large Scale Storable & Dispatchable Solar Energy Michael McDowell Rocketdyne Program Manager – Solar Power Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne Our Solar Vision HS SL&S Rocketdyne Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) Opportunity October 10, 2005 Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne We Combine Rocket Science: 50 Years of Rocketdyne Engines 2 4 15 30 668 Astronauts Saturn Saturn Space Delta Delta Redstone Navaho Jupiter Thor Atlas I/1B V Shuttle I/II/III IV 85 11 46 380 576 19 13 113 305 3 Active Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne And,And, EnergyEnergy HeritageHeritage Fast Flux Nuclear Test Facility r ea l c SRE New Production Nu Clinch River Sodium Advanced Reactor Gen IV - Molten Salt / Breeder Fast Reactor Liquid Metal Systems Reactor r a Solar 1 Solar 2 Power Towers 10 MW 10 MW 15-100 MW Sol Solar Dish Engine Dynamic System 25 KW 25 kW Fossil Coal Combustion Gasification Methane Coal Gas & Hydrogen Technologies Pilot Plant Combustion Generation Technologies 1950’s 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s 2000’s 2010’s North American Rockwell International Boeing UTC Atomics International Energy Systems Rocketdyne Propulsion & Power PWR Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne Solar Power Tower Technology: Large Scale Storable & Dispatchable Solar Energy Collect: • Sunlight concentrated on tower receiver • Molten salt heated to 1050F Store: • Large scale molten salt thermal storage Dispense: • Plant sizes 15 to 100+ MWe • Long-term electricity cost ~5 ¢/kWh Stand Alone ~3 ¢/kWh Hybrid • Dispatchable or 24 hour solar power Rocketdyne Focus – Solar • Plant capacity
    [Show full text]
  • Optimal Design and Control of Heliostat for Solar Power Generation
    IACSIT International Journal of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 4, No. 4, August 2012 Optimal Design and Control of Heliostat for Solar Power Generation Dong Il Lee, Woo Jin Jeon, Seung Wook Baek, and Nazar T. Ali transfer is changed by distance or angle between two surfaces. Abstract—The purpose of this research is to optimal design Consider two surfaces, 1 and 2, of an enclosure. Radiation and control of heliostat for solar power generation in real time. from A1 to A2 can be described by Eq. 1. B1A1 is the total Tracking the sun and calculating the position of the sun are possible by using illuminance sensor (CdS) and Simulink energy leaving the surface A1 as a constant and F1→2 indicates program. As heat transfer from heliostat to receiver is delivered its fraction arriving at A2. So, radiation flux reaching the by solar radiation, configuration factor commonly utilized in radiation is applied to control heliostat. Algorithms for surface A2 is maximized when F1→2 is maximal. Eq. 2 is the maximizing configuration factor between sun, heliostat and definition of the configuration factor. Fig. 1(a) represents the receiver in real time are programmed by Simulink. By applying fraction of total energy leaving surface 1 that is intercepted the optimized algorithms, the efficiency of the solar absorption by surface 2. in receiver can be maximized. Simulation was performed how to control azimuthal and elevation angles during the daytime with = respect to diverse distances. qBAF12→→ 1112. (1) Index Terms—Configuration factor, heliostat, CdS, simulink, solar tracking device. θθ 1 cos12 cos (2) Fd− = AdA.
    [Show full text]
  • LCOE Analysis of Tower Concentrating Solar Power Plants Using Different Molten-Salts for Thermal Energy Storage in China
    energies Article LCOE Analysis of Tower Concentrating Solar Power Plants Using Different Molten-Salts for Thermal Energy Storage in China Xiaoru Zhuang, Xinhai Xu * , Wenrui Liu and Wenfu Xu School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China; [email protected] (X.Z.); [email protected] (W.L.); [email protected] (W.X.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 11 March 2019; Accepted: 8 April 2019; Published: 11 April 2019 Abstract: In recent years, the Chinese government has vigorously promoted the development of concentrating solar power (CSP) technology. For the commercialization of CSP technology, economically competitive costs of electricity generation is one of the major obstacles. However, studies of electricity generation cost analysis for CSP systems in China, particularly for the tower systems, are quite limited. This paper conducts an economic analysis by applying a levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) model for 100 MW tower CSP plants in five locations in China with four different molten-salts for thermal energy storage (TES). The results show that it is inappropriate to build a tower CSP plant nearby Shenzhen and Shanghai. The solar salt (NaNO3-KNO3, 60-40 wt.%) has lower LCOE than the other three new molten-salts. In order to calculate the time when the grid parity would be reached, four scenarios for CSP development roadmap proposed by International Energy Agency (IEA) were considered in this study. It was found that the LCOE of tower CSP would reach the grid parity in the years of 2038–2041 in the case of no future penalties for the CO2 emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Science Can I Believe My Eyes?
    Student Edition I WST Physical Science Can I Believe My Eyes? Second Edition CAN I BELIEVE MY EYES? Light Waves, Their Role in Sight, and Interaction with Matter IQWST LEADERSHIP AND DEVELOPMENT TEAM Joseph S. Krajcik, Ph.D., Michigan State University Brian J. Reiser, Ph.D., Northwestern University LeeAnn M. Sutherland, Ph.D., University of Michigan David Fortus, Ph.D., Weizmann Institute of Science Unit Leaders Strand Leader: David Fortus, Ph.D., Weizmann Institute of Science David Grueber, Ph.D., Wayne State University Jeffrey Nordine, Ph.D., Trinity University Jeffrey Rozelle, Ph.D., Syracuse University Christina V. Schwarz, Ph.D., Michigan State University Dana Vedder Weiss, Weizmann Institute of Science Ayelet Weizman, Ph.D., Weizmann Institute of Science Unit Contributor LeeAnn M. Sutherland, Ph.D., University of Michigan Unit Pilot Teachers Dan Keith, Williamston, MI Kalonda Colson McDonald, Bates Academy, Detroit Public Schools, MI Christy Wonderly, Martin Middle School, MI Unit Reviewers Vincent Lunetta, Ph.D., Penn State University Sofia Kesidou, Ph.D., Project 2061, American Association for the Advancement of Science Investigating and Questioning Our World through Science and Technology (IQWST) CAN I BELIEVE MY EYES? Light Waves, Their Role in Sight, and Interaction with Matter Student Edition Physical Science 1 (PS1) PS1 Eyes SE 2.0.3 ISBN-13: 978- 1- 937846- 47 - 3 Physical Science 1 (PS1) Can I Believe My Eyes? Light Waves, Their Role in Sight, and Interaction with Matter ISBN- 13: 978- 1- 937846- 47- 3 Copyright © 2013 by SASC LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, by any means, without permission from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Map for the Installation of Concentrated Solar Power Towers in Chile
    energies Article Potential Map for the Installation of Concentrated Solar Power Towers in Chile Catalina Hernández 1,2, Rodrigo Barraza 1,*, Alejandro Saez 1, Mercedes Ibarra 2 and Danilo Estay 1 1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Av. Vicuña Mackenna 3939, Santiago 8320000, Chile; [email protected] (C.H.); [email protected] (A.S.); [email protected] (D.E.) 2 Fraunhofer Chile Research Foundation, General del Canto 421, of. 402, Providencia Santiago 7500588, Chile; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +56-22-303-7251 Received: 18 March 2020; Accepted: 23 April 2020; Published: 28 April 2020 Abstract: This study aims to build a potential map for the installation of a central receiver concentrated solar power plant in Chile under the terms of the average net present cost of electricity generation during its lifetime. This is also called the levelized cost of electricity, which is a function of electricity production, capital costs, operational costs and financial parameters. The electricity production, capital and operational costs were defined as a function of the location through the Chilean territory. Solar resources and atmospheric conditions for each site were determined. A 130 MWe concentrated solar power plant was modeled to estimate annual electricity production for each site. The capital and operational costs were identified as a function of location. The electricity supplied by the power plant was tested, quantifying the potential of the solar resources, as well as technical and economic variables. The results reveal areas with great potential for the development of large-scale central receiver concentrated solar power plants, therefore accomplishing a low levelized cost of energy.
    [Show full text]
  • California Desert Conservation Area Plan Amendment / Final Environmental Impact Statement for Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System
    CALIFORNIA DESERT CONSERVATION AREA PLAN AMENDMENT / FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR IVANPAH SOLAR ELECTRIC GENERATING SYSTEM FEIS-10-31 JULY 2010 BLM/CA/ES-2010-010+1793 In Reply Refer To: In reply refer to: 1610-5.G.1.4 2800lCACA-48668 Dear Reader: Enclosed is the proposed California Desert Conservation Area Plan Amendment and Final Environmental Impact Statement (CDCA Plan Amendment/FEIS) for the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System (ISEGS) project. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) prepared the CDCA Plan Amendment/FEIS for the ISEGS project in consultation with cooperating agencies and California State agencies, taking into account public comments received during the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process. The proposed plan amendment adds the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System project site to those identified in the current California Desert Conservation Area Plan, as amended, for solar energy production. The decision on the ISEGS project will be to approve, approve with modification, or deny issuance of the rights-of-way grants applied for by Solar Partners I, 11, IV, and VIII. This CDCA Plan Amendment/FEIS for the ISEGS project has been developed in accordance with NEPA and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976. The CDCA Plan Amendment is based on the Mitigated Ivanpah 3 Alternative which was identified as the Agency Preferred Alternative in the Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement for ISEGS, which was released on April 16,2010. The CDCA Plan Amendment/FEIS contains the proposed plan amendment, a summary of changes made between the DEIS, SDEIS and FEIS for ISEGS, an analysis of the impacts of the proposed decisions, and a summary of the written and oral comments received during the public review periods for the DEIS and for the SDEIS, and responses to comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of the Spot Shape on the Target for Flat Heliostats
    energies Article Evaluation of the Spot Shape on the Target for Flat Heliostats David Jafrancesco, Daniela Fontani ID , Franco Francini and Paola Sansoni * CNR-INO National Institute of Optics, Largo E. Fermi, 6-50125-Firenze, Italy; [email protected] (D.J.); [email protected] (D.F.); [email protected] (F.F.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-055-23081 Received: 23 May 2018; Accepted: 18 June 2018; Published: 21 June 2018 Abstract: The aim of this study is to evaluate the changes of the spot shape on the target in dependence of the variations of size and faceting of a flat heliostat or an array of heliostats. The flat heliostat, or a flat heliostat array, is a layout common for Concentation Solar Power (CSP) plants. The spot shape is evaluated by means of a numerical integration of an appropriate function; in order to confirm the results, both an analysis based on the Lagrange invariance and some simulations are performed. The first one validates the power density value in the central part of the spot, while the simulations assess the spot shape, which in its central part differs less than 3% from the calculated result. The utilized numerical method does not require specialized software or complex calculation models; it determines an accurate spot shape but cannot take into account shading and blocking phenomena. Keywords: optical design; heliostat; solar; concentration 1. Introduction During the last years, many theoretical and experimental researches were carried out in order to increase the efficiency and the ratio benefits/costs of solar plants.
    [Show full text]