DOCSLIB.ORG

Open PDF 446KB

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Open PDF 446KB Home Affairs Committee Oral evidence: Online harms, HC 342 Wednesday 20 January 2021 Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 20 January 2021. Watch the meeting Members present: Yvette Cooper (Chair); Ms Diane Abbott; Dehenna Davison; Ruth Edwards; Laura Farris; Simon Fell; Tim Loughton; Stuart C McDonald. Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee member present: Julian Knight. Questions 1 - 168 Witnesses I: Theo Bertram, Director of Government Relations and Public Policy for Europe, TikTok; Nick Pickles, Global Head of Public Policy Strategy and Development, Twitter; Derek Slater, Global Director of Information Policy, Google; and Henry Turnbull, Head of Public Policy UK & Nordics, Snap Inc. II: Monika Bickert, Vice President, Global Policy Management, Facebook; and Niamh Sweeney, Director of Public Policy EMEA, WhatsApp. Examination of Witnesses Witnesses: Theo Bertram, Nick Pickles, Derek Slater and Henry Turnbull. Q1 Chair: Welcome to this Home Affairs Select Committee evidence session on online harms. We have with us today Theo Bertram from TikTok, Nick Pickles from Twitter, Derek Slater from Google and covering YouTube, and Henry Turnbull from Snap Inc, covering Snapchat. Thank you very much to our witnesses for joining us today. We are very grateful for your time. The inauguration of President Biden and Vice President Harris is now under way, and there are 25,000 national guard guarding the Capitol and the ceremony. We are very clear that there could be more violence today, and we all have in our minds those terrible scenes of a violent mob storming the Capitol and assaulting an open democracy. Four years ago when this Committee first took evidence on online harms, we raised the issues around people escalating hatred or organising violence on social media, but we would not have imagined that we would ever see the scenes we saw this month. Given some of the anger and extremism that we have seen, how far do you feel that each of your platforms have made this possible? Derek Slater: Thank you, Chair, both for the question and for the opportunity to come before you today to continue this conversation about online harms. Certainly what happened this month was a terrible event, and we take very seriously our responsibility both with respect to that situation and, more broadly, with respect to providing high-quality, relevant information and addressing user safety, online harms and low-quality information. Over the years we have deployed multiple different levers to address that challenge, raising up authoritative, quality information, rewarding creators who create that sort of information, while removing illegal content or content that violates our content policies; in other words, reducing or not recommending content that is borderline. Q2 Chair: Sure, I know that you have policies. I am just asking you to reflect. How far do you think that your platform has enabled the kind of extremism that we have seen? Not what are your processes but, realistically, how far do you think your platforms have enabled this? Derek Slater: I approach that with pride and humility in the sense that I think we have continued to improve over time, but there is always more to do. There are always new challenges, new bad actors, new threat vectors. I look at the improvements we made a couple of years ago on our hate speech policy and the way that dealt with— Q3 Chair: Sure, and those are the things that you have done. I am asking you to have a bit of humility and tell us how much you think some of the groups that organised the assault on the Capitol were communicating, were using YouTube to radicalise each other, to publish their videos and so on. How far do you think that was happening? Derek Slater: We took action against groups that were violating our policies. Certainly, we are looking closely at what we need to do in the future to make sure we continue to pursue it. To give one example, late last year we improved our policies around harmful conspiracy theories connected to real-world harm and aimed at individuals or key groups, such as QAnon— Q4 Chair: Sure, but you are still telling me the measures that you are taking. I am interested, first, in how bad the problem has been. How much of this has been on your channels? Derek Slater: We have continued to make progress in removing and reducing this sort of harmful behaviour— Q5 Chair: You are still not answering my question. I am not asking you about the measures that you have taken. I am asking you about how much of this has been happening on your channel. Derek Slater: Chair, I am trying to answer the question. I understand. When we saw content that was violative, we did take action. I think we always have to continue to evaluate, and we are still taking stock of what happened and what we can do better, so I am happy to follow up and to continue as we evaluate the situation at hand. Q6 Chair: You basically think you have done everything you could and you have taken it all down? Derek Slater: No. I think we have to continue to improve over time. We get up every day thinking about, “How can we do better?” We are not resting on our laurels in any way. We will continue to evaluate how we did, how we are doing and what we need to do going forward. Q7 Chair: Have you removed white supremacist material from YouTube? Derek Slater: Yes, we remove material that expresses superiority based on race, religion or other characteristics of that sort. We do remove it from YouTube. Q8 Chair: How come I could find it just 10 minutes ago? How come I can find videos from Red Ice TV? I think you have banned the channel, but I could still find their material and their videos promoting white supremacist theories. They were being posted by other people just 10 minutes ago. Derek Slater: I am not familiar with the exact example you are talking about, but we use a combination of automated mechanisms to identify violative content. Those systems are getting better and better over time at identifying that content and ensuring it is removed before it is viewed at all, or certainly before it is widely viewed. I think last quarter 80% of the violative videos were removed before 10 views. We also rely on and are grateful for co-operation from users and trusted flaggers like the CTIRU, and for references from folks like yourself, to make sure that we are reactively responding where automated systems are not able to detect those things. I would be happy if you sent along that information. We will be able to take a further look at it. Q9 Chair: Do you think that none of the people who were storming the Capitol would have been radicalised on YouTube? Derek Slater: You know what, I think we have to look very carefully at this situation and make sure that we are continuing to address that challenge. The challenge of making sure we are not only removing violative content, but reducing and not recommending content that may not cross that line but borders it, is something that we need to continue to invest heavily in. Q10 Chair: Let me turn to Twitter. Mr Pickles, welcome. Can you reflect for me how much you think this kind of problem has been enabled by Twitter or the fact of Twitter’s existence over the last few years? Nick Pickles: Thank you, Chair, for the opportunity to appear and discuss this issue. Certainly, my colleagues and I were shocked watching the events unfold in the Capitol, and I think it is impossible for anyone who works in the technology sector to look at those events and not ask, “Did we play a part in this?” I think the answer has to be yes. The link between offline harm and online content is demonstrably real. Four years ago, you may have heard a different answer to that question. Looking at it, did we move fast enough on some of the conspiracy theories? One of the challenges is that there has not been an obvious tipping point where you would say, “This was the point where we should have taken action.” Last year we looked at QAnon, for example, and de- amplified it, made it harder to find and did not recommend it, but we allowed the speech to continue. This year we changed our approach and aggressively removed 70,000 accounts related to that. Now, if we were to reflect on our actions, should we have taken more aggressive enforcement action earlier? I think we have to say yes. The challenge right now is to look at our services and say, are the policies that we have now the ones we had in 2016? They are not. We have strengthened them significantly. Have we enforced them rigorously and consistently enough? Again, I think we have to say we have more work to do to enforce our policies consistently. Ultimately, are we willing to take the hard decisions when needed? Looking at our actions around the Capitol riots, ultimately suspending the personal account of the President of the United States was an unprecedented moment, but it was also a reflection of our service’s role in offline events. We saw how those tweets were being interpreted, and we took the decision to remove that account. We definitely have more to do and more to learn, but I also think we have made progress since 2016.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Changing Face of American White Supremacy Our Mission: to Stop the Defamation of the Jewish People and to Secure Justice and Fair Treatment for All
    A report from the Center on Extremism 09 18 New Hate and Old: The Changing Face of American White Supremacy Our Mission: To stop the defamation of the Jewish people and to secure justice and fair treatment for all. ABOUT T H E CENTER ON EXTREMISM The ADL Center on Extremism (COE) is one of the world’s foremost authorities ADL (Anti-Defamation on extremism, terrorism, anti-Semitism and all forms of hate. For decades, League) fights anti-Semitism COE’s staff of seasoned investigators, analysts and researchers have tracked and promotes justice for all. extremist activity and hate in the U.S. and abroad – online and on the ground. The staff, which represent a combined total of substantially more than 100 Join ADL to give a voice to years of experience in this arena, routinely assist law enforcement with those without one and to extremist-related investigations, provide tech companies with critical data protect our civil rights. and expertise, and respond to wide-ranging media requests. Learn more: adl.org As ADL’s research and investigative arm, COE is a clearinghouse of real-time information about extremism and hate of all types. COE staff regularly serve as expert witnesses, provide congressional testimony and speak to national and international conference audiences about the threats posed by extremism and anti-Semitism. You can find the full complement of COE’s research and publications at ADL.org. Cover: White supremacists exchange insults with counter-protesters as they attempt to guard the entrance to Emancipation Park during the ‘Unite the Right’ rally August 12, 2017 in Charlottesville, Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda, Tuesday 3Rd March 2020
    Bishop Auckland Town Council The Four Clocks Centre, 154a Newgate Street, Bishop Auckland, Co. Durham DL14 7EH Tel: 01388 609852 Email: [email protected] Website: www.bishopauckland-tc.gov.uk Town Clerk: David Anderson TO: ALL MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL 26th February 2020 Dear Councillor, I hereby give you notice that the next meeting of Bishop Auckland Town Council will be held in the Wesley Room at The Four Clocks Centre on Tuesday, 3rd March 2020 at 6.00 p.m. Yours sincerely David Anderson Clerk to the Council AGENDA 1. Apologies for absence 2. Declarations of Interest To invite members to declare any interest they may have. 3. Public Participation (Subject to Public Participation Policy) Presentations Time Allocation* *The Mayor will be flexible with the amount of time allocated where it is helpful to the debate. 4. Town Team 1. Core Team (Chairman, Nigel Bryson) 10 mins presentation 2. Events Team (Chairman, Clive Auld) 5 mins questions 5. Minutes To approve the Minutes of the following meetings:- Town Council 21st January 2020 Planning Committee 21st January 2020 Human Resources Committee 11th February 2020 Town Council 18th February 2020 Finance Committee 25th February 2020 6. Matters Arising To receive any matters arising from the above Minutes which are not included elsewhere on the agenda (for information only). 1 - 39 7. Report of Mayor To receive a report from the Mayor detailing activities attended to represent the Council since the Annual Meeting. 8. Report of Town Clerk 1. Bishop Auckland Town Team, Request to Draw Down Funds 2. Bishop Auckland Town Team, Request for Funding 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Members of the House of Commons December 2019 Diane ABBOTT MP
    Members of the House of Commons December 2019 A Labour Conservative Diane ABBOTT MP Adam AFRIYIE MP Hackney North and Stoke Windsor Newington Labour Conservative Debbie ABRAHAMS MP Imran AHMAD-KHAN Oldham East and MP Saddleworth Wakefield Conservative Conservative Nigel ADAMS MP Nickie AIKEN MP Selby and Ainsty Cities of London and Westminster Conservative Conservative Bim AFOLAMI MP Peter ALDOUS MP Hitchin and Harpenden Waveney A Labour Labour Rushanara ALI MP Mike AMESBURY MP Bethnal Green and Bow Weaver Vale Labour Conservative Tahir ALI MP Sir David AMESS MP Birmingham, Hall Green Southend West Conservative Labour Lucy ALLAN MP Fleur ANDERSON MP Telford Putney Labour Conservative Dr Rosena ALLIN-KHAN Lee ANDERSON MP MP Ashfield Tooting Members of the House of Commons December 2019 A Conservative Conservative Stuart ANDERSON MP Edward ARGAR MP Wolverhampton South Charnwood West Conservative Labour Stuart ANDREW MP Jonathan ASHWORTH Pudsey MP Leicester South Conservative Conservative Caroline ANSELL MP Sarah ATHERTON MP Eastbourne Wrexham Labour Conservative Tonia ANTONIAZZI MP Victoria ATKINS MP Gower Louth and Horncastle B Conservative Conservative Gareth BACON MP Siobhan BAILLIE MP Orpington Stroud Conservative Conservative Richard BACON MP Duncan BAKER MP South Norfolk North Norfolk Conservative Conservative Kemi BADENOCH MP Steve BAKER MP Saffron Walden Wycombe Conservative Conservative Shaun BAILEY MP Harriett BALDWIN MP West Bromwich West West Worcestershire Members of the House of Commons December 2019 B Conservative Conservative
    [Show full text]
  • Is the Intellectual Momentum All with the Left?
    Conservative Party Conference Fringe Event Tuesday 3rd October 2017 Is the Intellectual Momentum all with the Left? Is the Intellectual Momentum all with the Left? Introduction: Dean Godson (Director, Policy Exchange) Ladies & Gentlemen, any Lords in the House? So egalitarian, sign of modernisation that there’s nobody from the peerage present! So the huge attendance, the queues snaking around here, are a sign that this is one of the most important, if not the most important, fringe of conference, and all of you know that this issue has been foregrounded, put front and centre of British politics today, the extraordinary set of developments whereby one of the most peripheral members of the Parliamentary Labour Party of the last thirty years now looks as though he’s a serious contender for No. 10 Downing Street. The rise in the broader world of academic writing and general more popular writing of work such as Thomas Piketty’s, and the feeling that the Right is generally on the back foot and that some of the most retrograde and backward-looking members of the Hard Left are now setting the tone of public policy with the theme of the seventies, of the idea of capitalism in crisis. And the common view has been expressed in much of the media that the Right generally is on the back foot, that we’re back to that famous conversation between Bernard Donoghue, Jim Callaghan’s Chief of the Policy Unit at No. 10 Downing Street and Jim Callaghan saying… Donoghue saying during the ’79 Election, ‘I think we might win,’ and Callaghan saying, ‘No, there is a fundamental zeitgeist shift and it is in Mrs Thatcher’s direction.’ And that is the question which is before us here today.
    [Show full text]
  • Seyward Darby
    Techtopia with Chitra Ragavan Episode 5: Seyward Darby Chitra Ragavan: I was struck by the number of women taking part in the rioting at the US Capitol on January 6, by violent supporters of former President Donald Trump. Who are these women, I wondered? How have they exploited technology to expand their reach and influence in the alt-right movement? And have technology companies done enough to counter and combat their disinformation campaigns and hate messaging. Chitra Ragavan: Hello, everyone. I'm Chitra Ragavan, and this is Techtopia. Here to answer those questions and more is Seyward Darby. She is the author of Sisters in Hate: American Women on the Front Lines of White Nationalism. Darby is the editor in chief of The Atavist Magazine, a forum for great long-form journalism. Darby previously served as the deputy editor of Foreign Policy, and the online editor and assistant managing editor of The New Republic. As a writer, she has contributed to The Atlantic, The Washington Post, Elle, and Vanity Fair, among other publications. Chitra Ragavan: Seyward, welcome to Techtopia. Seyward Darby: Thank you so much for having me. Chitra Ragavan: What led you to start researching the role of women in white nationalism and to write Sisters in Hate? Seyward Darby: I began this project immediately after the election that preceded this one. So I guess four years prior, so in 2016. Just like January 6th of this year and the aftermath of the election in 2020 has led a lot of people to ask questions about the state of the country and to ask questions certainly about women's complicity in the far right in this country.
    [Show full text]
  • SPG Annual Weekend Conference Programme (PDF)
    STUDY OF PARLIAMENT GROUP Registered Charity No. 251208 Annual Conference Zoom (online) - 8-9 January 2021 https://studyofparliamentgroup.org/spg-annual-weekend-2021/ Friday 8 January - overview Session Time Panellists – Speakers, Respondents and Chairs General welcome 10:15-10:20 Professor Cristina Leston-Bandeira Annual General Meeting & launch of new 10:20-11:00 SPG Executive Committee SPG website Refreshments break 11:00-11:15 A chance to catch up with group members or take some time away from the screen Regulating MPs 11:15-12:15 Marcial Boo, Oonagh Gay OBE & Professor Mark Philp Chair: Dr Hannah White OBE Lunch break 12:15-13:00 A chance to catch up with group members or take some time away from the screen The Governance of Parliament: managing 13:00-14:15 Prof Diana Stirbu, Dr Mark Bennister, Sir legislatures from a comparative perspective Paul Grice, Lesley Hogg, Diane Bevan & Rt Hon Andrea Leadsom MP Chair: Dr Ben Yong Refreshments break 14:15-14:30 A chance to catch up with group members or take some time away from the screen The Palace of Westminster Restoration & 14:30-15:30 Liz Peace CBE & Jennifer Garett Renewal Programme: How might Dr Alexandra Meakin ‘restoration’ and ‘renewal’ take shape? Chair: Tom Healey Page 1 of 4 Parliament(s) Quiz 15:30-16:30 Participation by members in pre- arranged teams Comfort break 16:30-18:00 A chance to catch up with group members or take some time away from the screen Wheeler-Booth Memorial Lecture 18:00-19:00 Leader of the House, Rt Hon Jacob Rees- Mogg MP Prof Philip Lord Norton of Louth
    [Show full text]
  • Hate Beyond Borders: the Internationalization of White Supremacy
    Hate Beyond Borders: The Internationalization of White Supremacy Sections 1 Executive Summary 7 Conferences and Events 2 Introduction 8 Connections to Far-Right Political Parties 3 Summary of Country-Specific Ties Between 9 Additional White Supremacist Interaction European and American White Supremacists 10 Conclusion 4 European Influencers 11 Policy Recommendations 5 American Influencers 12 Footnotes 6 Canadian Influencers 13 Partner and Donor Recognition EXECUTIVE SUMMARY We are witnessing the internationalization of the white supremacist movement. Over the past decade, we have seen surging violence in the United States, Europe and beyond motivated by elements of white supremacy from Anders Breivik in Norway to Brenton Tarrant in New Zealand to Patrick Crusius in El Paso, Texas. These killers influence and inspire one another. European and American adherents are learning from each other, supporting each other and reaching new audiences. They feel empowered and emboldened because they perceive that they are influencing the political climate and reaching disaffected whites. 1 / 75 Global access to white supremacist ideology, and its easy dissemination across borders via various social media platforms, means many of the ideas promoted by the white supremacist movement — curtailing of non-white immigration, attacks on globalization and the accompanying conspiracies about elitist globalists — are increasingly part of mainstream political and social rhetoric. Exposing and understanding the connections among white supremacists and the paths by which they spread their hate are the first steps toward countering them. This report lays that groundwork, but continued vigilance and urgent action are necessary. Political leaders, law enforcement, social media companies, and educators have important roles to play and responsibilities to uphold.
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Eye Fall 2020 1.Pdf
    FALL 2020 The Public Eye Book Review: Spectres of Fascism • Could Anti-Government Militias Become Pro-State Paramilitaries? No Sanctuary: Anti-Abortion “Abolitionists” Go to City Hall • Conservative, Christian, Corporate: COVID-19 Opportunism and Betsy DeVos’s Education Agenda FALL 2020 Total Life Reform: The Real Consequences of the Far Right’s Self-Help Grift editor’s letter We’re closing this issue of The Public Eye on the eve of Election Day. Whatever this week THE PUBLIC EYE will bring, Political Research Associates will continue to bring sharp, relevant analysis and QUARTERLY insight to the trends shaping our country and world. PUBLISHER In our book review (pg. 3) this issue, Matthew N. Lyons reads Spectres of Fascism, a Tarso Luís Ramos collection of essays considering the rise of right-wing authoritarian and populist move- EDITOR ments across the world, from the U.S. and Hungary to India and the Philippines. “One Kathryn Joyce of the challenges in trying to understand fascism is that it touches on so many different COVER ART aspects of human experience,” writes Lyons, “from the brutality of mass imprisonment Shea Justice and killing to the pageantry of a political rally; from the calculations of geopolitics to the PRINTING intimacies of family life.” Park Press Printers In a piece encompassing original data research, “Could Anti-Government Militias Become Pro-State Paramilitaries?” (pg. 5), Jaclyn Fox and Carolyn Gallaher look at the The Public Eye is published by concerning possibility of overlap and collaboration between various sectors on the far- Political Research Associates right and the Trump administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard
    Thursday Volume 685 10 December 2020 No. 150 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 10 December 2020 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2020 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 969 10 DECEMBER 2020 970 right across every sector—over £100 billion for the House of Commons furloughing scheme, the self-employed income support scheme, grants, loans, VAT deferrals—and for freelancers Thursday 10 December 2020 we know the best thing we can do is get our sectors back up and running. That is what the culture recovery fund The House met at half-past Nine o’clock is all about. PRAYERS Tracy Brabin (Batley and Spen) (Lab/Co-op): Today, research from the Creative Industries Policy and Evidence Centre has shown that in the last six months there have [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] been 55,000 job losses in music and the performing and Virtual participation in proceedings commenced visual arts—all that talent, dedication and diversity of (Order, 4 June). voices lost. Our creative workers are desperate to get [NB: [V] denotes a Member participating virtually.] back to doing what they do best, and we know the simplest way to get money to freelancers is to make BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS shows, but to do that producers need a safety net. Germany has just announced an indemnity fund so INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF MATERNITY event organisers can plan for the second half of 2021 SERVICES without the financial risk posed by a potential covid Resolved, outbreak.
    [Show full text]
  • Nearly out of Lockdown, Light at the End of the Tunnel, Special
    Nearly out of lockdown, light at the end of the tunnel, special Inside: Two more pubs under threat, putting the C back in CAMRA, meeting the MPs, listening to the brewers, counting the County’s historical GBG entries, another lost brewery, and a quiz Hello and welcome to another limited edition, online only, advert-free, paperless issue of Durham Drinker. Perhaps the last in this format, but you never know…. To say it’s been a trying time for the hospitality industry over the last year is an understatement of gargantuan proportions, but at last there appears to be a glimmer of hope for it to come back to life. After lockdowns being imposed and partially lifted, before being imposed again, the industry appears to have been made the scapegoat for all sorts in the last twelve months, with restrictions based on no sci- entific evidence whatsoever. At least now some dates have been set for pubs and clubs to reopen—April12th for outdoor spaces (weather permitting) and May 17th for indoor, with a proposed return to whatever passes for normal social interaction on June 21st. This is, of course, all dependent on infection rates continuing to fall and the population “getting the jab”, amongst other things. Since Christmas, CAMRA Durham has begun a series of Zoom meetings with our local MPs in an attempt to pressure them into getting as much help for pubs, clubs, and breweries as they possibly can—there are more details on this elsewhere in this DD. One outcome of this is a regular newsletter, produced by CAMRA Durham, which is sent to all the local MPs so that they all know what each other is achieving.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration
    House of Commons Home Affairs Committee Appointment of the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration Sixth Report of Session 2019–21 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 14 January 2021 HC 1024 Published on 19 January 2021 by authority of the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee The Home Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Home Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Yvette Cooper MP (Labour, Normanton, Pontefract and Castleford) Chair Rt Hon Diane Abbott MP (Labour, Hackney North and Stoke Newington) Dehenna Davison MP (Conservative, Bishop Auckland) Ruth Edwards MP (Conservative, Rushcliffe) Laura Farris MP (Conservative, Newbury) Simon Fell MP (Conservative, Barrow and Furness) Andrew Gwynne MP (Labour, Denton and Reddish) Adam Holloway MP (Conservative, Gravesham) Dame Diana Johnson MP (Kingston upon Hull North) Tim Loughton MP (Conservative, East Worthing and Shoreham) Stuart C. McDonald MP (Scottish National Party, Cumbernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East) The following Members were also Members of the Committee during this Parliament: Janet Daby MP (Labour, Lewisham East); Stephen Doughty MP (Labour (Co-op) Cardiff South and Penarth); Holly Lynch MP (Labour, Halifax) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publications © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2021. This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament Licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Whole Day Download the Hansard
    Monday Volume 687 18 January 2021 No. 161 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Monday 18 January 2021 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2021 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 601 18 JANUARY 2021 602 David Linden [V]: Under the Horizon 2020 programme, House of Commons the UK consistently received more money out than it put in. Under the terms of this agreement, the UK is set to receive no more than it contributes. While universities Monday 18 January 2021 in Scotland were relieved to see a commitment to Horizon Europe in the joint agreement, what additional funding The House met at half-past Two o’clock will the Secretary of State make available to ensure that our overall level of research funding is maintained? PRAYERS Gavin Williamson: As the hon. Gentleman will be aware, the Government have been very clear in our [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] commitment to research. The Prime Minister has stated Virtual participation in proceedings commenced time and time again that our investment in research is (Orders, 4 June and 30 December 2020). absolutely there, ensuring that we deliver Britain as a [NB: [V] denotes a Member participating virtually.] global scientific superpower. That is why more money has been going into research, and universities will continue to play an incredibly important role in that, but as he Oral Answers to Questions will be aware, the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy manages the research element that goes into the funding of universities.
    [Show full text]