DOCSLIB.ORG

Part II: MEASURES, DECISIONS and RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED 48 at XXVI ATCM

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Final Report of XXVI ATCM FINAL REPORT 16/07/2003 1 Final Report of XXVI ATCM CONTENTS SUBJECT PAGE Acronyms and Abbreviations 4 PART I: FINAL REPORT OF XXVI ATCM 6 Appendix 1: Procedure for the Appointment of the Executive 40 Secretary of the Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty Appendix 2: Indicative estimates of the costs of the Secretariat of 45 The Antarctic Treaty. Part II: MEASURES, DECISIONS AND RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED 48 AT XXVI ATCM Annex A: Measures 49 Measure 1 (2003) Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty 50 Measure 2 (2003) Antarctic protected area system: 62 management plans for antarctic specially protected areas. ASPA No 105, Beaufort Island, Ross Sea; 63 ASPA No 114, Northern Coronation Island, South 82 Orkney Islands; ASPA No 118, Cryptogam Ridge, Mt Melbourne, 95 North Victoria Land and summit of Mt Melbourne, North Victoria Land; ASPA No 135, North-East Bailey Peninsula, Budd 106 Coast, Wilkes Land ASPA No 143, Marine Plain, Mule Peninsula, Vestfold 134 Hills, Princess Elizabeth Land; ASPA No 152, Western Bransfield Strait, Antarctic 155 Peninsula; ASPA No 153, Eastern Dallmann Bay, Antarctic 167 Peninsula; ASPA No 154, Botany Bay, Cape Geology, Victoria 180 Land; ASPA No 156, Lewis Bay, Mount Erebus, Ross Island, 193 Ross Sea; ASPA No 160, Frazier Islands, Wilkes Land; 201 ASPA No 161, Terra Nova Bay, Ross Sea. 221 Measure 3 (2003): Antarctic Protected Areas System: 240 Revised List of Historic Sites and Monuments Annex B: Decisions 256 Decision 1 (2003) Apportioning Contributions to the 257 Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty Decision 2 (2003) Provisional application of Measure 1 260 (2003) Decision 3 (2003) Staff Regulations for the Secretariat 264 of the Antarctic Treaty 2 Final Report of XXVI ATCM Decision 4 (2003) Financial Regulations for the 276 Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty Decision 5 (2003) Meeting of Experts on Tourism and 285 Non–Governmental Activities. Annex C: Resolutions 286 Resolution 1 (2003) 287 Resolution 2 (2003) Support of the ATCM for the 288 International Polar Year 2007/8 Resolution 3 (2003) Co-operation in Hydrographic 289 Survey and Charting of Antarctic Waters Resolution 4 (2003) Support for the Conservation of 291 Albatrosses and Petrels Part III: OPENING AND CLOSING ADDRESSES AND REPORTS 292 FROM XXVI ATCM Annex D: Opening and Closing Addresses 293 Annex E: Report of the Committee for Environmental Protection 301 (CEP V) Annex F: Reports under Recommendation XIII-2 (ATS 5a) 343 United States 344 Australia 356 United Kingdom 357 CCAMLR 361 SCAR 371 COMNAP 384 Annex G: Reports in relation to article III (2) (ATS 5b) 389 ASOC 390 IUCN 395 IAATO 405 IHO 424 PART IV: ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FROM XXVI ATCM 431 Annex H: Letter of Commitment of the Argentine Republic to 432 apply provisionally the Headquarters Agreement Annex I: Message from the XXVI Consultative Meeting to Stations 434 in the Antarctic Annex J: List of documents from ATCM XXVI 436 Annex K: List of participants 451 Annex L: National Contact Points 459 Annex M: Preliminary Agenda for ATCM XXVII 463 3 Final Report of XXVI ATCM ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ASOC Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition ASMA Antarctic Specially Managed Areas ASPA Antarctic Specially Protected Areas ATS Antarctic Treaty System ATCM Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting CCAMLR Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources CCAS Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Seals CEE Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation CEP Committee for Environmental Protection COMNAP Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programmes EIA Environmental Impact Assessment IAATO International Association of Antarctic Tour Operators ICG Intersessional Contact Group ICSU International Council for Science IEE Initial Environmental Evaluation IHO International Hydrographical Organisation IMO International Maritime Organization IOC Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission IP Information Paper IUCN World conservation Union SATCM Special Antarctic treaty Consultative Meeting SCAR Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research SPA Specially Protected Areas SSSI Site of Special Scientific Interest UNEP United Nations Environmental Programme 4 Final Report of XXVI ATCM WG Working Group WMO World Meteorological Organisation WP Working Paper WTO World Tourism Organisation WWF World Wildlife Fund 5 Final Report of XXVI ATCM PART I FINAL REPORT 6 Final Report of XXVI ATCM FINAL REPORT OF THE XXVI ANTARCTIC TREATY CONSULTATIVE MEETING MADRID, SPAIN, 9-20 JUNE, 2003. (1) Pursuant to article IX of the Antarctic Treaty, Representatives of the Consultative Parties (Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, China, Ecuador, Finland, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Peru, Poland, the Russian Federation, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States of America and Uruguay) met in Madrid from 9-20 June, 2003, for the purpose of exchanging information, holding consultations, and considering and recommending to their governments measures in furtherance of the principles and objectives of the Treaty. (2) The Meeting was also attended by Delegations of the following Contracting Parties to the Antarctic Treaty which are not Consultative Parties: Austria, Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Greece, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia, Switzerland and Ukraine. A representative of Malaysia was present by invitation of the XXVI ATCM to observe the Meeting. (3) In accordance with articles 2 and 30 of the Rules of Procedure (RP), Observers from the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR), the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR), and the Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programs (COMNAP) attended the Meeting. (4) In accordance with article 38 of the RP, Experts from the following International Organizations and Non-Governmental Organizations attended the Meeting by the invitation of the XXV ATCM: The Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition (ASOC), the International Association of Antarctica Tourist Operators (IAATO), the International Hydrographic Organization (IHO), the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP). The Chairman of the Artic Council was also invited to attend the Meeting for the purpose of item 9 of the Agenda. (5) The information requirements of the Host Country towards the Contracting Parties, Observers and Experts were fulfilled by Secretariat Circular Notes, letters and through a website with an open as well as a password protected area. (6) Informal working meetings of the Heads of Delegations of the Consultative Parties were held in Madrid on 8 and 18 June. 7 Final Report of XXVI ATCM Item 1: Opening of the Meeting (7) In accordance with articles 5 and 6 of the RP, Ambassador Fernando de la Serna, Head of the Spanish Delegation, opened the Meeting and proposed Ambassador José Antonio de Yturriaga as Chairman of the XXVI ATCM, proposal which was accepted. The Chairman welcomed the delegations of Contracting Parties, Observers and Experts, and called for a minute of silence in memory of Mr. Esteban de Salas, former Secretary of CCAMLR, and Major José Ripollés, Head of the Spanish Base “Gabriel de Castilla” in 2001-2002, who had recently died. (8) The XXVI ATCM was officially inaugurated by the Prince of Asturias, HRH Don Felipe de Borbón. After some introductory words by the Chairman, Mrs. María Elvira Rodriguez Herrer, Spanish Minister for the Environment, welcomed the delegates to Madrid, recalled the previous Meeting in Madrid in 1991 when the Protocol on Environmental Protection was signed, and underlined the importance of the Antarctic for the global ecosystem. (9) HRH the Prince emphasized the special nature of the Antarctic Treaty System, a unique case of collective administration. HRH analyzed the political, scientific and environmental aspects of the Antarctic regime. HRH mentioned that SCAR had received the Principe de Asturias Prize for international cooperation. HRH also encouraged that an agreement be reached on the establishment of the Permanent Secretariat in Buenos Aires during the course of this XXVI ATCM. (10) The opening statements are included in this Report at Annex D. Item 2: Election of Officers. (11) Mr. Chris Badenhorst, Head of the Delegation of South Africa (Host Country of the XXVII ATCM) was elected Vice-Chairman, and Ambassador Luis García Cerezo was appointed Secretary of the Meeting. (12) Four Working Groups were established: Secretariat WG, Liability WG, Institutional Matters WG and Operational WG. It was agreed that the Institutional WG would deal with the issue of tourism and that an “ad hoc” Chairman would be chosen at a later stage to preside over the discussion on such issue. The following Chairmen of the WG were elected: i) Secretariat WG: Prof. Francesco Francioni of Italy. ii) Institutional Matters WG: Mr. Jan Huber of The Netherlands. iii) Operational Matters WG: Ambassador José Manuel Ovalle of Chile. iv) Liability WG: Ambassador Don MacKay of New Zealand v) Institutional Matters-Tourism WG: Mr. Michel Brumeaux. 8 Final Report of XXVI ATCM Item 3: Adoption of the Agenda (13) The following Agenda, included in document RCTA/SEC.1 was adopted: 1) Opening of the Meeting. 2) Election of Officers. 3) Adoption of the Agenda. 4) Operation of the Antarctic Treaty System: a) General matters b) Antarctic Treaty Secretariat 5) Operation of the Antarctic Treaty System:
Recommended publications
  • Office of Polar Programs

    Office of Polar Programs

    DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SURFACE TRAVERSE CAPABILITIES IN ANTARCTICA COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION DRAFT (15 January 2004) FINAL (30 August 2004) National Science Foundation 4201 Wilson Boulevard Arlington, Virginia 22230 DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SURFACE TRAVERSE CAPABILITIES IN ANTARCTICA FINAL COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Purpose.......................................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation (CEE) Process .......................................................1-1 1.3 Document Organization .............................................................................................................1-2 2.0 BACKGROUND OF SURFACE TRAVERSES IN ANTARCTICA..................................2-1 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Re-supply Traverses...................................................................................................................2-1 2.3 Scientific Traverses and Surface-Based Surveys .......................................................................2-5 3.0 ALTERNATIVES ....................................................................................................................3-1
  • Potential Regime Shift in Decreased Sea Ice Production After the Mertz Glacier Calving

    Potential Regime Shift in Decreased Sea Ice Production After the Mertz Glacier Calving

    ARTICLE Received 27 Jan 2012 | Accepted 3 Apr 2012 | Published 8 May 2012 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1820 Potential regime shift in decreased sea ice production after the Mertz Glacier calving T. Tamura1,2,*, G.D. Williams2,*, A.D. Fraser2 & K.I. Ohshima3 Variability in dense shelf water formation can potentially impact Antarctic Bottom Water (AABW) production, a vital component of the global climate system. In East Antarctica, the George V Land polynya system (142–150°E) is structured by the local ‘icescape’, promoting sea ice formation that is driven by the offshore wind regime. Here we present the first observations of this region after the repositioning of a large iceberg (B9B) precipitated the calving of the Mertz Glacier Tongue in 2010. Using satellite data, we find that the total sea ice production for the region in 2010 and 2011 was 144 and 134 km3, respectively, representing a 14–20% decrease from a value of 168 km3 averaged from 2000–2009. This abrupt change to the regional icescape could result in decreased polynya activity, sea ice production, and ultimately the dense shelf water export and AABW production from this region for the coming decades. 1 National Institute of Polar Research, Tachikawa, Japan. 2 Antarctic Climate & Ecosystem Cooperative Research Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia. 3 Institute of Low Temperature of Science, Sapporo, Japan. *These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to T.T. (email: [email protected]) or to G.D.W. (email: [email protected]). NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 3:826 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1820 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications © 2012 Macmillan Publishers Limited.
  • Antarctic Peninsula

    Antarctic Peninsula

    Hucke-Gaete, R, Torres, D. & Vallejos, V. 1997c. Entanglement of Antarctic fur seals, Arctocephalus gazella, by marine debris at Cape Shirreff and San Telmo Islets, Livingston Island, Antarctica: 1998-1997. Serie Científica Instituto Antártico Chileno 47: 123-135. Hucke-Gaete, R., Osman, L.P., Moreno, C.A. & Torres, D. 2004. Examining natural population growth from near extinction: the case of the Antarctic fur seal at the South Shetlands, Antarctica. Polar Biology 27 (5): 304–311 Huckstadt, L., Costa, D. P., McDonald, B. I., Tremblay, Y., Crocker, D. E., Goebel, M. E. & Fedak, M. E. 2006. Habitat Selection and Foraging Behavior of Southern Elephant Seals in the Western Antarctic Peninsula. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2006, abstract #OS33A-1684. INACH (Instituto Antártico Chileno) 2010. Chilean Antarctic Program of Scientific Research 2009-2010. Chilean Antarctic Institute Research Projects Department. Santiago, Chile. Kawaguchi, S., Nicol, S., Taki, K. & Naganobu, M. 2006. Fishing ground selection in the Antarctic krill fishery: Trends in patterns across years, seasons and nations. CCAMLR Science, 13: 117–141. Krause, D. J., Goebel, M. E., Marshall, G. J., & Abernathy, K. (2015). Novel foraging strategies observed in a growing leopard seal (Hydrurga leptonyx) population at Livingston Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Animal Biotelemetry, 3:24. Krause, D.J., Goebel, M.E., Marshall. G.J. & Abernathy, K. In Press. Summer diving and haul-out behavior of leopard seals (Hydrurga leptonyx) near mesopredator breeding colonies at Livingston Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Marine Mammal Science.Leppe, M., Fernandoy, F., Palma-Heldt, S. & Moisan, P 2004. Flora mesozoica en los depósitos morrénicos de cabo Shirreff, isla Livingston, Shetland del Sur, Península Antártica, in Actas del 10º Congreso Geológico Chileno.
  • Haswell Island (Haswell Island and Adjacent Emperor Penguin Rookery on Fast Ice)

    Haswell Island (Haswell Island and Adjacent Emperor Penguin Rookery on Fast Ice)

    Measure 5 (2016) Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area No. 127 Haswell Island (Haswell Island and Adjacent Emperor Penguin Rookery on Fast Ice) 1. Description of values to be protected The area includes Haswell Island with its littoral zone and adjacent fast ice when present. Haswell Island was discovered in 1912 by the Australian Antarctic Expedition led by D. Mawson. It was named after William Haswell, professor of biology who rendered assistance to the expedition. Haswell is the biggest island of the same-name archipelago, with a height of 93 meters and 0,82 sq.meters in area. The island is at 2,5 km distance from the Russian Mirny Station operational from 1956. At East and South-East of the island, there is a large colony of Emperor penguins (Aptenodytes forsteri) on fast ice. The Haswell Island is a unique breeding site for almost all breeding bird species in East Antarctica including the: Antarctic petrel (Talassoica antarctica), Antarctic fulmar (Fulmarus glacioloides), Cape petrel (Daption capense), Snow petrel (Pagodroma nivea), Wilson’s storm petrel (Oceanites oceanicus), South polar skua (Catharacta maccormicki), Lonnberg skua Catharacta antarctica lonnbergi and Adelie penguin (Pygoscelis adeliae). The Area supports five species of pinnipeds, including the Ross seal (Ommatophoca rossii) which falls in the protected species category. ATCM VIII (Oslo, 1975) approved its designation as SSSI 7 on the aforementioned grounds after a proposal by the USSR. Map 1 shows the location of the Haswell Islands (except Vkhodnoy Island), Mirny Station, and logistic activity sites. It was renamed and renumbered as ASPA No. 127 by Decision 1 (2002).
  • The Antarctic Treaty

    The Antarctic Treaty

    The Antarctic Treaty Measures adopted at the Thirty-ninth Consultative Meeting held at Santiago, Chile 23 May – 1 June 2016 Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs by Command of Her Majesty November 2017 Cm 9542 © Crown copyright 2017 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at Treaty Section, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, King Charles Street, London, SW1A 2AH ISBN 978-1-5286-0126-9 CCS1117441642 11/17 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majestyʼs Stationery Office MEASURES ADOPTED AT THE THIRTY-NINTH ANTARCTIC TREATY CONSULTATIVE MEETING Santiago, Chile 23 May – 1 June 2016 The Measures1 adopted at the Thirty-ninth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting are reproduced below from the Final Report of the Meeting. In accordance with Article IX, paragraph 4, of the Antarctic Treaty, the Measures adopted at Consultative Meetings become effective upon approval by all Contracting Parties whose representatives were entitled to participate in the meeting at which they were adopted (i.e. all the Consultative Parties). The full text of the Final Report of the Meeting, including the Decisions and Resolutions adopted at that Meeting and colour copies of the maps found in this command paper, is available on the website of the Antarctic Treaty Secretariat at www.ats.aq/documents.
  • Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 78/Tuesday, April 23, 2019/Rules

    Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 78/Tuesday, April 23, 2019/Rules

    Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 23, 2019 / Rules and Regulations 16791 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require Agricultural commodities, Pesticides SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The any special considerations under and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978, as Executive Order 12898, entitled requirements. amended (‘‘ACA’’) (16 U.S.C. 2401, et ‘‘Federal Actions to Address Dated: April 12, 2019. seq.) implements the Protocol on Environmental Justice in Minority Environmental Protection to the Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., Populations and Low-Income Antarctic Treaty (‘‘the Protocol’’). Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, Director, Office of Pesticide Programs. Annex V contains provisions for the 1994). Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is protection of specially designated areas Since tolerances and exemptions that amended as follows: specially managed areas and historic are established on the basis of a petition sites and monuments. Section 2405 of under FFDCA section 408(d), such as PART 180—[AMENDED] title 16 of the ACA directs the Director the tolerance exemption in this action, of the National Science Foundation to ■ do not require the issuance of a 1. The authority citation for part 180 issue such regulations as are necessary proposed rule, the requirements of the continues to read as follows: and appropriate to implement Annex V Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. to the Protocol. et seq.) do not apply. ■ 2. Add § 180.1365 to subpart D to read The Antarctic Treaty Parties, which This action directly regulates growers, as follows: includes the United States, periodically food processors, food handlers, and food adopt measures to establish, consolidate retailers, not States or tribes.
  • Antarctic Treaty Handbook

    Antarctic Treaty Handbook

    Annex Proposed Renumbering of Antarctic Protected Areas Existing SPA’s Existing Site Proposed Year Annex V No. New Site Management Plan No. Adopted ‘Taylor Rookery 1 101 1992 Rookery Islands 2 102 1992 Ardery Island and Odbert Island 3 103 1992 Sabrina Island 4 104 Beaufort Island 5 105 Cape Crozier [redesignated as SSSI no.4] - - Cape Hallet 7 106 Dion Islands 8 107 Green Island 9 108 Byers Peninsula [redesignated as SSSI no. 6] - - Cape Shireff [redesignated as SSSI no. 32] - - Fildes Peninsula [redesignated as SSSI no.5] - - Moe Island 13 109 1995 Lynch Island 14 110 Southern Powell Island 15 111 1995 Coppermine Peninsula 16 112 Litchfield Island 17 113 North Coronation Island 18 114 Lagotellerie Island 19 115 New College Valley 20 116 1992 Avian Island (was SSSI no. 30) 21 117 ‘Cryptogram Ridge’ 22 118 Forlidas and Davis Valley Ponds 23 119 Pointe-Geologic Archipelago 24 120 1995 Cape Royds 1 121 Arrival Heights 2 122 Barwick Valley 3 123 Cape Crozier (was SPA no. 6) 4 124 Fildes Peninsula (was SPA no. 12) 5 125 Byers Peninsula (was SPA no. 10) 6 126 Haswell Island 7 127 Western Shore of Admiralty Bay 8 128 Rothera Point 9 129 Caughley Beach 10 116 1995 ‘Tramway Ridge’ 11 130 Canada Glacier 12 131 Potter Peninsula 13 132 Existing SPA’s Existing Site Proposed Year Annex V No. New Site Management Plan No. Adopted Harmony Point 14 133 Cierva Point 15 134 North-east Bailey Peninsula 16 135 Clark Peninsula 17 136 North-west White Island 18 137 Linnaeus Terrace 19 138 Biscoe Point 20 139 Parts of Deception Island 21 140 ‘Yukidori Valley’ 22 141 Svarthmaren 23 142 Summit of Mount Melbourne 24 118 ‘Marine Plain’ 25 143 Chile Bay 26 144 Port Foster 27 145 South Bay 28 146 Ablation Point 29 147 Avian Island [redesignated as SPA no.
  • The Antarctic Treaty Cm 8841

    The Antarctic Treaty Cm 8841

    The Antarctic Treaty Measures adopted at the Thirty-sixth Consultative Meeting held at Brussels, 20 – 29 May 2013 Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs by Command of Her Majesty March 2014 Cm 8841 © Crown copyright 2014 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence v.2. To view this licence visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/2/ or email [email protected] This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at Treaty Section, Foreign and Commo nwealth Office, King Charles Street, London, SW1A 2AH Print ISBN 9781474101134 Web ISBN 9781474101141 Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID P002631486 03/14 Printed on paper containing 30% recycled fibre content minimum MEASURES ADOPTED AT THE THIRTY-SIXTH ANTARCTIC TREATY CONSULTATIVE MEETING Brussels, Belgium, 20-29 May 2013 The Measures1 adopted at the Thirty-sixth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting are reproduced below from the Final Report of the Meeting. In accordance with Article IX, paragraph 4, of the Antarctic Treaty, the Measures adopted at Consultative Meetings become effective upon approval by all Contracting Parties whose representatives were entitled to participate in the meeting at which they were adopted (i.e. all the Consultative Parties). The full text of the Final Report of the Meeting, including the Decisions and Resolutions adopted at that Meeting and colour copies of the maps found in this command paper, is available on the website of the Antarctic Treaty Secretariat at www.ats.aq/documents.
  • United States Antarctic Program S Nm 5 Helicopter Landing Facilities 22 2010-11 Ms 180 N Manuela (! USAP Helo Sites (! ANZ Helo Sites This Page: 1

    United States Antarctic Program S Nm 5 Helicopter Landing Facilities 22 2010-11 Ms 180 N Manuela (! USAP Helo Sites (! ANZ Helo Sites This Page: 1

    160°E 165°E ALL170°E FACILITIES Terra Nova Bay s United States Antarctic Program nm 5 22 Helicopter Landing Facilities ms 180 n Manuela 2010-11 (! (! This page: USAP Helo Sites ANZ Helo Sites 75°S 1. All facilities 75°S 2. Ross Island Maps by Brad Herried Facilities provided by 3. Koettlitz Glacier Area ANTARCTIC GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION CENTER United States Antarctic Program Next page: 4. Dry Valleys August 2010 Basemap data from ADD / LIMA ROSS ISLAND Peak Brimstone P Cape Bird (ASPA 116) (! (! Mt Bird Franklin Is 76°S Island 76°S 90 nms Lewis Bay (A ! ay (ASPA 156) Mt Erebus (Fang Camp)(! ( (! Tripp Island Fang Glacier ror vasse Lower Erebus Hut Ter rth Cre (!(! Mt No Hoopers Shoulder (!M (! (! (! (! Pony Lake (! Mt Erebus (!(! Cape Cape Royds Cones (AWS Site 114) Crozier (ASPA 124) o y Convoy Range Beaufort Island (AS Battleship Promontory C SPA 105) Granite Harbour Cape Roberts Mt Seuss (! Cotton Glacier Cape Evans rk 77°S T s ad (! Turks Head ! (!(! ( 77°S AWS 101 - Tent Island Big Razorback Island CH Surv ey Site 4 McMurdo Station CH Su (! (! rvey Sit s CH te 3 Survey (! Scott Base m y Site 2 n McMurdo Station CH W Wint - ules Island ! 5 5 t 3 Ju ( er Stora AWS 113 - J l AWS 108 3 ge - Biesia Site (! da Crevasse 1 F AWS Ferrell (! 108 - Bies (! (! siada Cr (! revasse Cape Chocolate (! AWS 113 - Jules Island 78°S AWS 109 Hobbs Glacier 9 - White Is la 78°S nd Salmon Valley L (! Lorne AWS AWS 111 - Cape s (! Spencer Range m Garwood Valley (main camp) Bratina I Warren n (! (!na Island 45 Marshall Vall (! Valley Ross I Miers Valley (main
  • Federal Register/Vol. 70, No. 218/Monday, November 14, 2005

    Federal Register/Vol. 70, No. 218/Monday, November 14, 2005

    69098 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 218 / Monday, November 14, 2005 / Rules and Regulations * * * * * unless authorized by permit as well as hereby designated as Antarctic Specially [FR Doc. 05–22466 Filed 11–10–05; 8:45 am] the ACA’s blanket prohibition on Protected Areas (ASPA). The Antarctic BILLING CODE 6560–50–P damaging, removing or destroying a Conservation Act of 1978, as amended, Historic Site or Monument. No public prohibits, unless authorized by a permit, comment is needed the addition of these any person from entering or engaging in NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION areas or sites merely implements activities within an ASPA. Detailed measures adopted by the Treaty Parties maps and descriptions of the sites and 45 CFR Part 670 at various ATCM meetings. complete management plans can be Finally, these amendments correct obtained from the National Science Conservation of Antarctic Animals and typographical errors in the names and Foundation, Office of Polar Programs, Plants numerical listings of several specially National Science Foundation, Room protected areas previously published in AGENCY: National Science Foundation. 755, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, § 670.29. Virginia 22230. ACTION: Direct final rule. Determinations ASPA 101 Taylor Rookery, Mac. SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Antarctic NSF has determined, under the Robertson Land, East Antarctica Conservation Act of 1978, The National ASPA 102 Rookery Islands, Holme criteria set forth in Executive Order Science Foundation (NSF) is amending Bay, Mac. Robertson Land, East 12866, that this rule is not a significant its regulations to designate additional Antarctica regulatory action requiring review by Antarctic Specially Protected Areas ASPA 103 Ardery Island and Odbert the Office of Management and Budget.
  • JAHRBUCH DER GEOLOGISCHEN BUNDESANSTALT Jb

    JAHRBUCH DER GEOLOGISCHEN BUNDESANSTALT Jb

    JAHRBUCH DER GEOLOGISCHEN BUNDESANSTALT Jb. Geol. B.-A. ISSN 0016–7800 Band 149 Heft 1 S. 61–109 Wien, Juli 2009 A Revision of the Tonnoidea (Caenogastropoda, Gastropoda) from the Miocene Paratethys and their Palaeobiogeographic Implications BERNARD LANDAU*), MATHIAS HARZHAUSER**) & ALAN G. BEU***) 2 Text-Figures, 10 Plates Paratethys Miozän Gastropoda Caenogastropoda Tonnoidea Österreichische Karte 1 : 50.000 Biogeographie Blatt 96 Taxonomie Contents 1. Zusammenfassung . 161 1. Abstract . 162 1. Introduction . 162 2. Geography and Stratigraphy . 162 3. Material . 163 4. Systematics . 163 1. 4.1. Family Tonnidae SUTER, 1913 (1825) . 163 1. 4.2. Family Cassidae LATREILLE, 1825 . 164 1. 4.3. Family Ranellidae J.E. GRAY, 1854 . 170 1. 4.4. Family Bursidae THIELE, 1925 . 175 1. 4.5. Family Personidae J.E. GRAY, 1854 . 179 5. Distribution of Species in Paratethyan Localities . 180 1. 5.1. Diversity versus Stratigraphy . 180 1. 5.2. The North–South Gradient . 181 1. 5.3. Comparison with the Pliocene Tonnoidean Fauna . 181 6. Conclusions . 182 3. Acknowledgements . 182 3. Plates 1–10 . 184 3. References . 104 Revision der Tonnoidea (Caenogastropoda, Gastropoda) aus dem Miozän der Paratethys und paläobiogeographische Folgerungen Zusammenfassung Die im Miozän der Paratethys vertretenen Gastropoden der Überfamilie Tonnoidea werden beschrieben und diskutiert. Insgesamt können 24 Arten nachgewiesen werden. Tonnoidea weisen generell eine ungewöhnliche weite geographische und stratigraphische Verbreitung auf, wie sie bei anderen Gastropoden unbekannt ist. Dementsprechend sind die paratethyalen Arten meist auch in der mediterranen und der atlantischen Bioprovinz vertreten. Einige Arten treten zuerst im mittleren Miozän der Paratethys auf. Insgesamt dokumentiert die Verteilung der tonnoiden Gastropoden in der Parate- thys einen starken klimatischen Einfluss.
  • UC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works

    UC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works

    UC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works Title Molluscan marginalia: Serration at the lip edge in gastropods Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2mx5c6w9 Journal Journal of Molluscan Studies, 80(3) ISSN 0260-1230 Author Vermeij, GJ Publication Date 2014 DOI 10.1093/mollus/eyu020 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Journal of The Malacological Society of London Molluscan Studies Journal of Molluscan Studies (2014) 80: 326–336. doi:10.1093/mollus/eyu020 Advance Access publication date: 16 April 2014 Molluscan marginalia: serration at the lip edge in gastropods Geerat J. Vermeij Geology Department, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA Correspondence: G.J. Vermeij; e-mail: [email protected] Downloaded from (Received 5 September 2013; accepted 10 February 2014) ABSTRACT The shells of many marine gastropods have ventrally directed serrations (serial projections) at the edge http://mollus.oxfordjournals.org/ of the adult outer lip. These poorly studied projections arise as extensions either of external spiral cords or of interspaces between cords. This paper describes taxonomic, phylogenetic, architectural and func- tional aspects of serrations. Cord-associated serrations occur in cerithiids, strombids, the personid Distorsio anus, ocenebrine muricids and some cancellariids. Interspace-associated serrations are phylo- genetically much more widespread, and occur in at least 16 family-level groups. The nature of serration may be taxonomically informative in some fissurellids, littorinids, strombids and costellariids, among other groups. Serrated outer lips occur only in gastropods in which the apex points more backward than upward, but the presence of serrations is not a necessary byproduct of the formation of spiral sculp- tural elements.