DOCSLIB.ORG

(L'nui Menikuk First Nation): Community Summaries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(L'nui Menikuk First Nation): Community Summaries CA PDF Page 1 of 4 Energy East Pipeline Ltd. Energy East Project Consolidated Application Volume 10: Aboriginal Engagement Appendix 10-143A Indian Island First Nation (L’nui Menikuk First Nation): Community Summaries May 2016 CA PDF Page 2 of 4 Energy East Pipeline Ltd. Appendix 10-143A Consolidated Application Indian Island First Nation (L’nui Menikuk First Nation): Volume 10: Aboriginal Engagement Community Summaries 1.0 COMMUNITY SUMMARY – INDIAN ISLAND FIRST NATION (L’NUI MENIKUK FIRST NATION) Indian Island First Nation, as a member community of the Assembly of First Nations’ Chiefs in New Brunswick (AFNCNB), was represented by the AFNCNB for engagement on the Project since April 2013. For details on this collective and engagement activities to date, see the AFNCNB community summaries Appendix 10-136A. 1.1 April 1, 2013 to April 18, 2014 Indian Island First Nation is a Mi’kmaq Nation nestled at the mouth of the Richibucto River in Kent County, New Brunswick. The total registered membership of this community is 182 persons.1 Indian Island First Nation was identified as potentially affected by the Project and Energy East has been sharing information on the Project with the community in April 2013. In July 2013, the Energy East Aboriginal engagement team contacted the Chief of Indian Island First Nation to request a meeting regarding the Project with Chief and Council. Energy East also sent the Chief a draft letter of agreement (LOA) that set out the conditions for initial engagement between Energy East and Indian Island First Nation. In August 2013, several representatives from the Energy East Aboriginal engagement team met with the Chief of Indian Island First Nation to discuss the Project. The Chief expressed the desire to be engaged and supported a collective approach through the AFNCNB. The Chief also expressed the need for there to be an economic development and job strategy associated with the engagement process. In August 2013, the Energy East Aboriginal engagement team received an email from the AFNCNB Consultation Coordinator to reconfirm the verbal direction of the Chiefs to work under a collective engagement strategy led by the AFNCNB. Included in the email were 14 Band Council Resolutions (BCRs) delegating authority from the individual First Nations to the AFNCNB (BCR – Delegation) to engage with Energy East on their behalf from the following First Nation communities: Madawaska Maliseet First Nation Tobique First Nation Woodstock First Nation Kingsclear First Nation Oromocto First Nation 1 Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada website, accessed July 2014. May 2016 Page 1 of 3 CA PDF Page 3 of 4 Appendix 10-143A Energy East Pipeline Ltd. Indian Island First Nation (L’nui Menikuk First Nation): Consolidated Application Community Summaries Volume 10: Aboriginal Engagement Eel Ground First Nation Metepenagiag Mi’kmaq Nation Buctouche First Nation Fort Folly First Nation Elsipogtog First Nation Esgenoôpetitj First Nation Indian Island First Nation Pabineau First Nation Eel River Bar First Nation Also included was a copy of their Interim Consultation Protocol Agreement to guide Crown consultation in New Brunswick as it relates to First Nations communities. While engagement with these communities continues through the AFNCNB based on this collective approach, Energy East continues to share available information with these individual communities as requested. For details on this collective engagement process and engagement activities to date, see the AFNCNB community summary Appendix 10-136A. As of April 18, 2014, Energy East continues to engage Indian Island First Nation through the AFNCNB. 1.2 Direct Engagement – April 1, 2015 to June 30, 2015 In April 2015, the Chief of Indian Island First Nation contacted Energy East to discuss possible impacts on potential First Nation vendors and contractors in light of recent Project scope changes in Québec. Energy East confirmed that there would be no resulting negative impact on contracts or employment associated with the Project and that the delay in completion would provide extra time for First Nation vendors and contractors to build capacity and capability in its bid to obtain a contract with the Project. In June 2015, Energy East met with the Chief of Indian Island First Nation to discuss the Project’s geotechnical and geophysical field program. The Chief advised that some concern was expressed at an AFNCNB Chiefs’ meeting regarding the timely provision of information regarding the geophysical and geotechnical field program. Energy East informed the Chief that a description of the work to be conducted was provided in May 2015 to the AFNCNB but that timing and locations of the work had not been determined at that time. In June, once locations and timing of the work was confirmed by the Project, Energy East shared the information with all First Nations communities in New Brunswick engaged on the Project. Page 2 of 3 May 2016 CA PDF Page 4 of 4 Energy East Pipeline Ltd. Appendix 10-143A Consolidated Application Indian Island First Nation (L’nui Menikuk First Nation): Volume 10: Aboriginal Engagement Community Summaries 1.3 Direct Engagement – July 1, 2015 to September 30, 2015 In July 2015, Energy East and Aboriginal Contracting and Employment delivered a presentation to the North Shore Mi’kmaq District Council, at which Indian Island First Nation was in attendance. Energy East provided information on the Project’s Aboriginal Contracting and Employment Program. Energy East stated that it is gathering more information from First Nations regarding workforce capacity, availability, and qualified contractors before beginning discussions about potential opportunities. Energy East further advised the participants that it is awaiting the completion of a workforce assessment conducted by the JEDI to better understand the available training opportunities for First Nations in the province. During the meeting, Energy East responded to the following Project-specific concerns: safety valves and potential effects on the environment emergency response management in the event of a spill environmental monitors economic benefits Later in the month, Energy East and the Aboriginal Contracting and Employment team met with Indian Island First Nation and two local suppliers to discuss contracting and employment and the various opportunities available within the Aboriginal Contracting and Employment team. Energy East responded to questions from the community regarding contracting and employment and procurement processes. Subsequently, Energy East and the Aboriginal Contracting and Employment team met with Indian Island First Nation and Esgenoôpetitj First Nation to discuss engagement activities on the Project. The community requested more information regarding contracting and employment and Energy East agreed to host a follow-up meeting to provide a Project update and to discuss contracting and employment opportunities. 1.4 Direct Engagement – October 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 In November 2015, Energy East emailed all communities engaged on the Project in New Brunswick to provide notification that an amendment to the Energy East NEB Application will be filed in December 2015. Included in the email was a hyperlink to the Energy East and TransCanada’s news release advising of the upcoming filing. May 2016 Page 3 of 3 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Eldergatheringfinalreport
    HONOURING OUR ELDERS: a traditional gathering to share knowledge Final Report 2013 1.0 Background The Atlantic Policy Congress of First Nations Chiefs Secretariat in cooperation with the Atlantic Elder Care Working Group presented a two day regional gathering to share knowledge and discuss ways to improve the health and well-being of our First Nations. Best practices and lessons learned for working alongside Elders, plus current AAEDIRP research was shared. There were Elder lead workshops, panels and sharing circles. The event took place on June 20-21, 2013 at the Crowne Plaza in Fredericton, New Brunswick. The theme of the gathering was Honouring Our Elders: A Traditional Gathering to Share Knowledge. The intent was to share knowledge and gain important insight from our Elders to support their health and well-being. The Gathering included workshops on issues such as mental health, chronic disease management, wills and estates etc.; plenary sessions; and small group discussions to facilitate garnering the views of our Elders. There was also a banquet and cultural showcase on the evening of June 20, 2013. Elders from almost all of our Atlantic First Nations communities attended this historic event. 2.0 Objectives The objectives of this event were: • To share knowledge among Elders across Atlantic Canada • To discuss health issues related to First Nations and Elders • To develop action items that would improve the health and well-being of First Nations • To create a dialogue across the Atlantic provinces regarding Elder health Carey Romeo 1 3.0 The Gathering Thursday, June 20th - Day 1 Opening Ceremony EMCEE Allan Polchies Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Director Report 2006 -2007
    Executive Director Report 2006 -2007 General: Mi’kmaq, Maliseet, Passamaquoddy, Over the past year our organization has and Innu Chiefs. It also provides conducted 4 All Chiefs Forums, 5 Chiefs Health Canada (HC) DIAND officials an Executive meetings, including the Annual opportunity to address all Councils on General Assembly as well as the Annual the work/efforts of the DIAND/HC to All Chiefs and Councils Assembly held on support communities’ efforts. September 26th and 27th, 2006. In addition to an overview of work, the In October 2006, the APC Chiefs elected a Forum provides an opportunity to focus new Co-Chair, Chief Noah Augustine, and re- and get impact on strategies or issues elected Co-Chair Chief Lawrence Paul. The which continue to impact communities in current members of the APC Executive for the key areas of housing/water, residential next two years include Chief Shirley Clarke, schools, and prescription drug issues. Chief Deborah Robinson, Chief Terry Paul, Through the dialogue and discussion Chief Candace Paul, Chief Ben Peter-Paul, with all representatives any gaps Chief Jeff Tomah, Chief Darlene Bernard, and or additions to work being done is Chief Mi’sel Joe. identified for each staff person and the files assigned based on directions The Chiefs adopted a total of 20 resolutions. received from the All Chiefs Forums. Nation issues and a legislative agenda. The The issues covered ranged from the Water first area of focus was the water issue and regulatory proposal, education, legal defense The Chiefs in the region continue to focus the appointment of a First Nation Expert fund, founding APC members, Mi’kmaq on five key priorities of the communities Water Panel to seek input over the summer Maliseet Youth Council (MMYC), FN Fisheries which are: Housing and Infrastructure, on how to address the water quality crisis in Knowledge Network (FNFKN), Residential Health, Economic Development, Education, First Nation communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Government of New Brunswick Duty to Consult Policy
    Government of New Brunswick Duty to Consult Policy Aboriginal Affairs Secretariat Province of New Brunswick November 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Introduction .........................................................................................................p. 1 B. Duty to Consult Policy ........................................................................................p. 2 1. Policy Statement 2. Policy Goal 3. Objectives 4. Guiding Principles C. Duty to Consult .....................................................................................................p. 3 1. Policy Application 2. Matters Subject to the Duty to Consult Policy 3. Triggers 4. Roles and Responsibilities.................................................................................p. 4 D. Conclusion...............................................................................................................p. 5 E. Appendix A – First Nations in New Brunswick...................................................p. 6 F. Appendix B – Glossary...........................................................................................p. 7 A. Introduction Section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 “recognizes and affirms" the "existing" Aboriginal and treaty rights in Canada. Aboriginal rights derive from the long-standing use and occupancy of Canada by Aboriginals prior to European settlement. In order for an aboriginal custom, practice or tradition to be considered an aboriginal right, it must be integral to the distinctive culture of an aboriginal society. These
    [Show full text]
  • 8.13 Current Use of Land and Resources for Traditional Purposes by Aboriginal Persons
    SISSON PROJECT: FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) REPORT 8.13 CURRENT USE OF LAND AND RESOURCES FOR TRADITIONAL PURPOSES BY ABORIGINAL PERSONS The Current Use of Land and Resources for Traditional Purposes by Aboriginal Persons has been selected as a valued environmental component (VEC) in recognition of the current use the land and resources for traditional purposes by Aboriginal persons, and to assess the potential environmental effects of the Project as required by the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA) and the Final Guidelines (NBENV 2009). The lands of central New Brunswick have been, and are being, used by Aboriginal persons for traditional hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, subsistence and related purposes. An Indigenous Knowledge Study (IKS) was prepared by Moccasin Flower Consulting Inc., on behalf of the St. Mary’s First Nation, Woodstock First Nation, and Madawaska Maliseet First Nation (Moccasin Flower Consulting 2013). This Northcliff-sponsored study reports that land and resources near the Project area have been, and are being, used for traditional purposes by Maliseet First Nations. The Project will result in the loss of access to, or use of, land and resources in the Project Development Area (PDA) and Local Assessment Area (LAA) (both terms are defined in Section 8.13.1.4 below) due to the physical presence of the Project facilities and associated exclusion zones. These potential interactions of the Project with the Current Use of Land and Resources for Traditional Purposes by Aboriginal Persons are of concern to Aboriginal communities in New Brunswick because they could result in a loss of access to, or use of, areas currently used for traditional purposes by Aboriginal persons.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX I Aboriginal Fishing Licences Information
    SCOTIAN BASIN EXPLORATION DRILLING PROJECT – ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Appendix I – Aboriginal Fishing Licences Information APPENDIX I Aboriginal Fishing Licences Information Scotia-Fundy Communal Commercial Licences by Aboriginal Organization (2015-2016) Aboriginal Organization Licence Id Species Description Licence Type Description Licence Area Description Licence Subtype Description ACADIA FIRST NATION 300209 ALEWIVES/GASPEREAU CC NON-VESSEL BASED LIMITED TUSKET RIVER ACADIA FIRST NATION 120769 CLAMS, UNSPECIFIED CC NON-VESSEL BASED LIMITED CLAM HARVEST AREA - 3 ACADIA FIRST NATION 120846 CLAMS, UNSPECIFIED CC NON-VESSEL BASED LIMITED CLAM HARVEST AREA - 3 ACADIA FIRST NATION 120981 CLAMS, UNSPECIFIED CC NON-VESSEL BASED LIMITED CLAM HARVEST AREA - 3 ACADIA FIRST NATION 121964 CLAMS, UNSPECIFIED CC NON-VESSEL BASED LIMITED CLAM HARVEST AREA - 3 ACADIA FIRST NATION 122000 CLAMS, UNSPECIFIED CC NON-VESSEL BASED LIMITED CLAM HARVEST AREA - 3 ACADIA FIRST NATION 122046 CLAMS, UNSPECIFIED CC NON-VESSEL BASED LIMITED CLAM HARVEST AREA - 3 ACADIA FIRST NATION 122096 CLAMS, UNSPECIFIED CC NON-VESSEL BASED LIMITED CLAM HARVEST AREA - 4 ACADIA FIRST NATION 122141 CLAMS, UNSPECIFIED CC NON-VESSEL BASED LIMITED CLAM HARVEST AREA - 2 ACADIA FIRST NATION 122184 CLAMS, UNSPECIFIED CC NON-VESSEL BASED LIMITED CLAM HARVEST AREA - 3 ACADIA FIRST NATION 122251 CLAMS, UNSPECIFIED CC NON-VESSEL BASED LIMITED CLAM HARVEST AREA - 4 ACADIA FIRST NATION 338316 CRAB, GREEN CC NON-VESSEL BASED LIMITED ACADIA FIRST NATION 338316 CRAB, GREEN CC NON-VESSEL
    [Show full text]
  • New Brunswick Directory of English-Language Literacy Programs
    Literacy Coalition of New Brunswick Ltd. 2 New Brunswick Directory of English‐Language Literacy Programs Literacy Coalition of New Brunswick Ltd. Tel: 506‐457‐1227 921 College Hill Road Toll Free:1‐800‐563‐2211 Fredericton, NB Fax: 506‐458‐1352 E3B 6Z9 Email: [email protected] Executive Director: Natasha Bozek Project Coordinator: Maureen Hughes Researchers: Maureen Hughes & Nicki Jewett Research Assistant & Editor: Madeline West July, 2011 Funded by the Province of New Brunswick, Department of Education Acknowledgements The Literacy Coalition of New Brunswick Ltd. wishes to express sincere appreciation to the literacy practitioners and organizations who generously volunteered their time to participate in this survey. Thanks also to the volunteer Board of Directors of the Literacy Coalition of New Brunswick for their valued contribution to this project. The Literacy Coalition of New Brunswick gratefully acknowledges the New Brunswick Department of Education for initiating and funding this project. Copyright © 2011 All Rights Reserved No reproduction, copy, or transmission of the document may be made without written permission. Literacy Coalition of New Brunswick Ltd. 3 New Brunswick Directory of English‐Language Literacy Programs TABLE OF CONTENTS PROVINCIAL PROGRAMS Aboriginal Skills & Training Strategic Investment Fund Born to Read / Le Goût de Lire Community Action Plan for Children (CAPC) Family Resource Centres Community Adult Learning Program (CALP) First Nations Education Initiative Laubach Literacy Learning Disabilities Association
    [Show full text]
  • 8.13 Current Use of Lands and Resources for Traditional Purposes
    SISSON PROJECT: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA) REPORT 8.13 CURRENT USE OF LAND AND RESOURCES FOR TRADITIONAL PURPOSES BY ABORIGINAL PERSONS The Current Use of Land and Resources for Traditional Purposes by Aboriginal Persons has been selected as a valued environmental component (VEC) in recognition of the current use the land and resources for traditional purposes by Aboriginal persons, and to assess the potential environmental effects of the Project as required by the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA) and the Final Guidelines (NBENV 2009). The lands of central New Brunswick have been, and are being, used by Aboriginal persons for traditional hunting, fishing, trapping, gathering, subsistence and related purposes. An Indigenous Knowledge Study (IKS) was prepared by Moccasin Flower Consulting Inc., on behalf of the St. Mary’s First Nation, Woodstock First Nation, and Madawaska Maliseet First Nation (Moccasin Flower Consulting 2013). This Northcliff-sponsored study reports that land and resources near the Project area have been, and are being, used for traditional purposes by Maliseet First Nations. The Project will result in the loss of access to, or use of, land and resources in the Project Development Area (PDA) and Local Assessment Area (LAA) (both terms are defined in Section 8.13.1.4 below) due to the physical presence of the Project facilities and associated exclusion zones. These potential interactions of the Project with the Current Use of Land and Resources for Traditional Purposes by Aboriginal Persons are of concern to Aboriginal communities in New Brunswick because they could result in a loss of access to, or use of, areas currently used for traditional purposes by Aboriginal persons.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Traditional Land and Resource Use
    CA PDF Page 1 of 70 Energy East Project Part E: New Brunswick Volume 16: Socio-Economic Effects Assessment Section 5: Traditional Land and Resource Use This section was not updated in 2015. Figures referencing the Project description have been updated to reflect the removal of a marine terminal in Québec. However, the analysis of effects is still valid. This TLRU assessment is supported by Volume 25, which contains information gathered through TLRU studies completed by participating Aboriginal groups, oral traditional evidence and TLRU-specific results of Energy East’s aboriginal engagement program from April 19, 2014 to December 31, 2015. The list of First Nation and Métis communities and organizations engaged and reported on is undergoing constant revision throughout the discussions between Energy East and potentially affected Aboriginal groups. Information provided through these means relates to Project effects and cumulative effects on traditional land and resource use, and recommendations for mitigating effects, as identified by participating Aboriginal groups. The most relevant information for this section is Volume 25 for Woodlands ecoregion, which reviews additional TRLU information identifies proposed measures to mitigate potential effects of the Project on TRLU features, activities, or sites identified, as appropriate. The TLRU information provided in Volume 25 reflects Project design changes that occurred in 2015. 5 TRADITIONAL LAND AND RESOURCE USE Traditional land and resource use (TLRU)1 was selected as a valued component (VC) due to the potential for the Project to affect traditional activities, sites and resources identified by Aboriginal communities. Project Aboriginal engagement activities and the review of existing literature (see Appendix 5A.2) confirmed the potential for Project effects on TLRU.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Public and First Nations Participation Environmental Impact Assessment Proposal by Sisson Mines Ltd to Construct
    SUMMARY OF PUBLIC AND FIRST NATIONS PARTICIPATION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT PROPOSAL BY SISSON MINES LTD TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE AN OPEN PIT TUNGSTEN AND MOLYBDENUM MINE NEAR NAPADOGAN, NEW BRUNSWICK Prepared by the Department of Environment and Local Government January 2016 Table of Contents Background ii EIA Conclusion and Decision iv Final Steps in the EIA Process Steps Following the EIA Process v Federal Environmental Assessment (EA) Process v Independent EIA Panel Review Table of Contents 1 List of Tables 5 List of Figures 5 1.0 Introduction 7 2.0 Terms of Reference 8 3.0 Process and Meetings Held 10 4.0 Methodology 11 5.0 Issues raised and Panel Opinions – Introduction 11 6.0 First Nations 12 7.0 Socioeconomic 93 8.0 Tailings Storage, Seepage and Baseline Hydrology Concerns 95 9.0 Bonding 138 10.0 Health Issues 143 11.0 List of Recommendations 188 12.0 Appendices 199 Background In the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report to the Minister of Environment and Local Government, Sisson Mines Ltd., or the proponent, has proposed to construct and operate an open pit tungsten and molybdenum mine west of Napadogan, approximately 60 kilometres northwest of Fredericton, New Brunswick. Following a two year construction period, the open pit mine would operate for an estimated 27 years and the project development area (PDA) would cover 1,253 hectares (3,096 acres) of Crown lands. Approximately 30,000 tonnes of ore would be mined and processed on-site per day. The resulting mineral products would be trucked to nearby rail facilities for transportation to customers.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Engagement Guide Finalized Dra� – March 2021
    OCEAN FRONTIER INSTITUTE Indigenous Engagement Guide Finalized Dra� – March 2021 Disclaimer The Ocean Frontier Institute Indigenous Engagement Guide was developed in collaboration with our Indigenous Engagement Steering Committee and from feedback generously provided by Indigenous groups and the OFI research community. The Guide is intended to be evergreen and will grow and adapt as we move forward with our Indigenous engagement efforts and continue to receive feedback from Indigenous groups and our research community. It is important to understand that this guide is intended for information purposes only and offers perspectives and guidance for working toward meaningful and respectful engagement with Indigenous communities, organizations, and groups. The Guide was developed as a guiding document to better inform our OFI research community regarding Indigenous engagement in Atlantic Canada and should not be considered final or authoritative in nature. Any questions or concerns about this Guide can be directed to Catherine Blewett, Chief Strategic Engagement Officer OFI, at (902) 497-2387 or email at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Ocean Frontier Institute, Dillon Consulting. (2021). Ocean Frontier Institute’s Indigenous Engagement Guide. Retrieved from https://oceanfrontierinstitute.com/uploads/pdfs/indigenous-guide-march-2021.pdf. Accessed on: Month Day, Year Table of Contents i Table of Contents 1.0 Acknowledgements 1 1.1 Territorial Acknowledgement ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • In the Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick Cour Du
    Cause No.: IN THE COURT OF QUEEN’S BENCH OF NEW COUR DU BANC DE LA REINE DU BRUNSWICK NOUVEAU-BRUNSWICK TRIAL DIVISION DIVISION DE PREMIÈRE INSTANCE JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF MIRAMICHI CIRCONSCRIPTION JUDICIAIRE DE B E T W E E N: E N T R E: CHIEF ANN MARY STEELE ON BEHALF OF HERSELF AND THE MEMBERS OF THE BUCTOUCHE FIRST NATION, CHIEF GEORGE GINNISH ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND THE MEMBERS OF THE EEL GROUND FIRST NATION, CHIEF LYNN LABILLOIS ON BEHALF OF HERSELF AND THE MEMBERS OF THE EEL RIVER BAR FIRST NATION, CHIEF REBECCA KNOCKWOOD ON BEHALF OF HERSELF AND THE MEMBERS OF THE FORT FOLLY FIRST NATION, CHIEF KENNETH BARLOW ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND THE MEMBERS OF THE INDIAN ISLAND FIRST NATION, CHIEF BILL WARD ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND THE MEMBERS OF THE METEPENAGIAG MI’KMAQ NATION, CHIEF DAVID PETER-PAUL ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND THE MEMBERS OF THE PABINEAU FIRST NATION Plaintiffs -and- THE PROVINCE OF NEW BRUNSWICK, Demandeur Defendant - et- Défendeur NOTICE OF ACTION WITH STATEMENT OF AVIS DE POURSUITE ACCOMPAGNÉ CLAIM ATTACHED D'UN EXPOSÉ DE LA DEMANDE (Form 16A) (FORMULE 16A) TO: The Defendant, Province of New Brunswick 673 King George Highway Miramichi NB E1V 1N6 LEGAL PROCEEDINGS HAVE BEEN PAR LE DÉPOT DU PRÉSENT AVIS DE COMMENCED AGAINST YOU BY FILING POURSUITE ACCOMPAGNÉ D'UN EXPOSÉ THIS NOTICE OF ACTION WITH STATEMENT DE LA DEMANDE, UNE PURSUITE OF CLAIM ATTACHED. JUDICIAIRE A ÉTÉ ENGAGE CONTRE VOUS. If you wish to defend these proceedings, either you Si vous désirez présenter une défense dans cette or a New Brunswick lawyer acting on
    [Show full text]
  • People of the First Light
    1 Changes in the Dawnland Web URL: http://arcg.is/1W6QM0k Tap the play button to animate the map. Beginning of animation: End of animation: For thousands of generations, Wabanaki people have lived across what is now northern New England, the Canadian Maritimes, and Quebec. The arrival of Europeans more than 500 years ago began a process of dramatic and destructive loss that continues today. Much of the Wabanaki homeland was taken through a series of treaties, negotiated between various Wabanaki groups and the French, English, Massachusetts, Maine, and United States governments. Wabanaki and non-Native signatories often had very different ideas and interpretations of what they had agreed to. Wabanaki communities today are working to protect what remains, and to assert their sovereign rights in their homeland, for future generations. For photos and information about Wabanaki communities today, tap here: WABANAKI TODAY 2 Wabanaki Today Web URL: http://arcg.is/1QGlJ7O The Wabanaki Nations – Abenaki, Maliseet, Mi’kmaq, Passamaquoddy, and Penobscot – are thriving and growing in Maine and beyond. We invite you to visit, at least virtually, the many contemporary Wabanaki communities across Ckuwaponahkik, “the land of the dawn.” Click on a community name on a TAB above to learn more about the people and places of the Penobscot, Passamaquoddy, Mi'kmaq, Maliseet, and Abenaki Nations. Tap on the map markers to see details about tribal communities and land holdings. Photos courtesy of (clockwise from top left) Grace Jia, Bangor Daily News, Abbe Museum, and Donald Soctomah 3 Tribal lands include reservations and reserves where many members live and work, and where tribal governments serve their communities.
    [Show full text]