California Plant Information Systems

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

California Plant Information Systems CAPIS california plant information systems by Brenna Castro University of California, Davis Landscape Architecture A Senior Project, Spring 2012 project approval ________________________________ Steve Greco Associate Professor of Enviornmental Design ________________________________ Truman Young Professor of Plant Sciences ________________________________ Glenda Drew Associate Professor of Design ________________________________ Heath Schenker Senior Project Instructor abstract The landscape architect’s plant selection process is complex, considering many factors from site and climate requirements to design and aesthetic qualities; but a comprehensive searchable listing of all such relevant informa- tion is not available, so the plant selection process is complicated by cross- referencing of many different sources. This is especially true for California native plants – where there is a growing trend to design with natives, there is not a comparable improvement in resources to make information about these plants accessible to landscape architects. This project analyzes the plant selection process, identifying goals of plant selection and how California na- tives meet these goals, and applying these goals to understand where exist- ing resources fall short. This analysis is applied to create a new database en- titled CAPIS: California Plant Information Systems, which is accessed through a dynamic website to improve accessibility of information about California native plants by landscape architects. CAPIS is intended as a tool to aid in plant selection, compiling relevant information into one resource; it facilitates the landscape architect’s plant selection process and the use of California na- tives in the landscape. dedication For: My parents and my sister, whose love and support are always there when I need it and even when I don’t. My friends, classmates, and peers, who told me to go for it, and whose com- pany late at night kept me inspired and sane. My studio family. And Anna. ii acknowledgements My committee members: Glenda Drew, Steve Greco, and Truman Young, for their encouragement, insight, and expertise. Gayle Totton, for always being a voice of reason, for being a wonderfully available sounding board, and for lending me her beautiful and inspiring per- sonal database. Brian Morgan, for his help in database management and design. Laurie Gates and Stewart Winchester, for their help in understanding the challenges of categorizing plant maintenance. Eric Lin, for being endlessly full of solutions to my PHP problems. iii 17 Review of Existing Resources 18 Botanical databases 20 Horticultural databases 22 Commercial databases table of contents 23 Print: lists and recommendations 25 Methods 25 Data collection 25 Pant list 27 Plant data 29 Building the database 29 Software and coding: MySQL with SQL Abstract 30 Data modeling ii Dedication 33 Website management iii Acknowledgements 33 Web standards v List of Images 33 Coding languages vii Preface 36 Parts of the information system 1 Introduction 39 Discussion 2 Project Goals 39 Meeting project goals 3 Definitions 40 Meeting personal goals 42 Direction for the future 5 Understanding Plant Selection 44 Project Significance 5 Planting design philosophy 7 Goals of plant selection 45 References 7 Aesthetics 47 Appendix A: Glossary 9 Ecology 48 Appendix B: Plant List 10 Characteristics of Interest 14 How California natives meet plant selection goals 14 Aesthetics 15 Site ecology 15 Local ecology iv 10 1.10 Vine form. Clematis pauciflora. Neal Kramer (2010). 11 1.11 Plant forms. Brenna Castro (2012). list of images 12 1.12 Fine texture, Festuca californica. Ken Gilliand (2009). 12 1.13 Medium texture, Salvia apiana. Stanley Spencer 12 1.14 Coarse texture, Umbellularia californica. Barry Breckling (2009). 12 1.15 Epilobium canum. Keir Morse (2008). 6 1.1 The wide, low-ceilinged space under a Blue Oak 12 1.16 Eschscholzia californica. George Jackson (2011). (Quercus douglasii). Keir Morse (2009). 12 1.17 Parkinsonia florida. Ken Gilliand (2008). 7 1.2 Harmonious color scheme. 12 1.18 Rhamnus californica. Steve Matson (2006). 7 1.3 Complementary color scheme. 12 1.19 Ceanothus ‘Concha’. Ken Gilliand (2008). 8 1.4 Combining forms - plumes, spires, umbels, and daisy-like flowers. 12 1.20 Iris douglasiana. Gary A. Monroe (1994). 10 1.5 Tree, Quercus lobata. Gary A. Monroe (2005). 12 1.21 Ribes malvaceum. Gerald and Buff Corsi at Califonia Academy of Sciences (2007). 10 1.6 Shrub, Salvia clevelandii. Curtis Croulet (2009). 12 1.22 Achillea millefolium. Keir Morse (2008). 10 1.7 Herbaceous perennial, Heuchera maxima. Jean Pawek (2010). 13 1.23 Arbutus menziesii. Julie Wakelin (2006). 10 1.8 Herbaceous annual, Eschscholzia californica. 13 1.24 Calocedrus decurrens. Steve Perkins (2005). Gerald and Buff Corsi at California Academy of Sci- 13 1.25 Platanus racemosa. Bon Terra Consulting ences (2008). (2003). 10 1.9 Groundcover form. Juniperus communis. Barry 14 1.26 Jepson Bioregions in California. Regents of the Breckling (2009). University of California (n.d.). v 15 1.27 Route of introduction for California’s invasive 35 3.5 The CAPIS Plant Search page. plants. Di Tomaso (2011). 36 3.6 The Query Results page, showing sample results 15 1.28 Purple loosestrife invading riparian wildlands. from a query for plants with a perennial herbaceous Louis-M. Landry (2006). habit. 18 2.1 CalFlora. (2009). 37 3.7 The Plant Page for California Fuchsia. 18 2.2 Jepson Online Interchange. Regents of the Uni- 37 3.8 The List by Name page, sorted by common versity of California (n.d.). name. 18 2.3 USDA PLANTS Database. USDA, 2012. 38 3.9 The CAPIS home page. 20 2.4 Theodore Payne Foundation California Natives Wiki. Theodore Payne Foundation (2012). 21 2.5 UC Davis Arboretum All-Stars. University of California, Davis (n.d.) 21 2.6 The New Sunset Western Garden Book. Sunset. (2012). 22 2.7 Las Pilitas Nursery. (2012). 22 2.8 Monrovia Nursery. (2012). 22 2.9 Moosa Creek Nursery. (2010). 22 2.10 Annie’s Annuals at Annie’s Amazing Nursery. Annie’s Annuals. (n.d.). 28 3.1 CAPIS data fields. 31 3.2 MySQL user interface for data entry and editing. 32 3.3 CAPIS data types and descriptions. 34 3.4 HTML and CSS code samples showing the out- put as it appears on the CAPIS website. vi preface This project was conceived out of frustration. As a land- but when the time came to put together a plant palette, the scape architecture student, I have created plant palettes for right plant never came to mind. A searchable database, full many projects including design development projects and of information important to me as a landscape architecture construction documents, but found myself unsure of the student and future professional, would put all this infor- best way to go about doing so. Studies of horticulture and mation at my fingertips. Having taught myself basic web plant biology familiarize students with the range of plants design during my preteen years, I felt comfortable build- available for use in the built landscape, but few resources ing a simple website to serve as the platform for accessing are available to students to aid in the plant selection pro- the database, making the information accessible not only cess. I became very familiar with what resources I did have for myself but also for landscape architecture students, access to, including botanical databases and horticultural professionals, and anyone hoping to learn more about the plant lists, but a fair amount of cross-referencing and plants of California. searching made it obvious that a more refined plant selec- tion tool was needed. My own personal studies of plant bi- -Brenna Castro ology, California floristics, and horticulture have taught me that the California flora is broad, diverse, and beautiful, vii introduction The CAPIS project, short for California Plant Information CAPIS website, www.california-plant.com, creates an Systems, is a searchable online database of California information network by linking users to other databases, native plants, intended for use by landscape architects and plant images, care information, and commercial availability. landscape architecture students to aid in plant selection. CAPIS is a tool for designers intended to aid in the plant In order to meet the needs of this profession, the database selection process and encourage use of native plants in the is searchable by both site-specific and design-specific landscape. criteria. In addition to providing database access, the 1 Goals architect as well as images and links to plant listings on other websites. Next, to make the database publicly available, a This project first necessitates a thorough understanding of the dynamic website, www.california-plant.com, was built to plant selection process, both to help understand how our current serve as a simple access platform, allowing users to query the resources fall short, and also to help build a tool optimized for database, returning lists of plants and data for each listed use by the landscape architect, providing as much information entry. The website also links to other resources to build a as possible without including unnecessary or unhelpful network of information – the information system – that directs information. The project analyzes plant selection as a part of the users to other websites pertaining to California native plants, landscape architect’s design process and identifies a set of plant including other databases, care and maintenance guides, and selection goals, then further analyzing how California native nursery availability listings. The project draws on a wide range plants meet these goals. This analysis of plant selection goals of resources with the aim of making this information more is applied in a review of existing resources to identify gaps in easily accessible to landscape architects, students, and related the available databases and lists, categorizing these resources professionals, improving the way we learn about California into several main groups by their primary use.
Recommended publications
  • Redalyc.Géneros De Lamiaceae De México, Diversidad Y Endemismo
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad ISSN: 1870-3453 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México Martínez-Gordillo, Martha; Fragoso-Martínez, Itzi; García-Peña, María del Rosario; Montiel, Oscar Géneros de Lamiaceae de México, diversidad y endemismo Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, vol. 84, núm. 1, marzo, 2013, pp. 30-86 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Distrito Federal, México Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=42526150034 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 84: 30-86, 2013 DOI: 10.7550/rmb.30158 Géneros de Lamiaceae de México, diversidad y endemismo Genera of Lamiaceae from Mexico, diversity and endemism Martha Martínez-Gordillo1, Itzi Fragoso-Martínez1, María del Rosario García-Peña2 y Oscar Montiel1 1Herbario de la Facultad de Ciencias, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. partado postal 70-399, 04510 México, D.F., México. 2Herbario Nacional de México, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Apartado postal 70-367, 04510 México, D.F., México. [email protected] Resumen. La familia Lamiaceae es muy diversa en México y se distribuye con preferencia en las zonas templadas, aunque es posible encontrar géneros como Hyptis y Asterohyptis, que habitan en zonas secas y calientes; es una de las familias más diversas en el país, de la cual no se tenían datos actualizados sobre su diversidad y endemismo.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunbow Ii, Phase 3 Project Fire Protection Plan
    Appendix H3 Fire Protection Plan SUNBOW II, PHASE 3 PROJECT FIRE PROTECTION PLAN Prepared for: Lennar Homes of California, Inc. 16465 Via Esprillo, Suite 150 San Diego, California 92127 Contact: David Shepherd Project Applicant ACI Sunbow, LLC 2356 Moore Street San Diego, California 92110 Contact: Bill Hamlin Prepared by: 605 Third Street Encinitas, California 92024 MARCH 2021 Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. Table of Contents SECTION PAGE NO. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................................................. V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................................................................. VII 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Applicable Codes and Existing Regulations .......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Proposed Project Summary ................................................................................................................... 2 1.2.1 Location ..................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2.2 Proposed Project Description ................................................................................................... 2 2 PROPOSED PROJECT SITE RISK ANALYSIS...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FINAL Programmatic Environmental Assessment Wildfire Hazard Mitigation Projects in the State of Montana
    FINAL Programmatic Environmental Assessment Wildfire Hazard Mitigation Projects in the State of Montana September 2019 Federal Emergency Management Agency Region VIII Department of Homeland Security Denver Federal Center Building 710, Box 25267 Denver, CO 80225-0267 This document was prepared by Contract No.: HSFE60‐15‐D‐0015 Task Order: HSFE60‐17-J-0026 Cover Photo Credit: Nicky Ouellet, Montana Public Radio Table of Contents SECTION 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Wildfire Hazard Mitigation .......................................................................................... 1-2 1.2 Background ................................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Area of Study ................................................................................................................ 1-2 1.4 Process for the Use of This PEA .................................................................................. 1-4 SECTION 2. Purpose and Need .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Project Purpose ............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Project Need .................................................................................................................. 2-1 SECTION 3. Alternatives ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Heuchera/X Heucherella/Tiarella
    Heuchera/x Heucherella/Tiarella Mark Begick The family Saxifragaceae comprises chiefly north temperate plants and includes many alpine and arctic species of xerophytic habit. This makes them adaptable and able to survive under different conditions, which is the reason why saxifrages, in particular) are so often used for dry rockery plantings. The Saxifragaceae is a large family and includes many easily recognizable genera (e.g., Astilbe, Bergenia, Heuchera, Heucherella, Rogersia, Saxifraga, and Tiarella, just to name a few). Species and cultivars of Bergenia and Heuchera are tough and persistent, so make good border plants for cool climates. Heuchera – The Coral Bells The genus Heuchera is named after Johann Heinrich von Heucher, who was a German professor of medicine. Fifty to seventy species are native to North America but only H. sanguinea, coral bells, and hybrids have gained popularity in North American gardens. These plants are either evergreen or semi- evergreen. Most of the improved cultivars are hybrids between H. sanguinea, H. americana, and H. micrantha. Many of these hybridized plants are ornamentally chosen for their colorful foliage. A few do have ornamental flowers of white, pink, or red . Heucheras do best in rich, moist well-drained soils in partial shade. They are better adapted to cooler climates, and sometimes this can enhance leaf color, especially in fall. x Heucherella – The Foamy Bells Many examples of hybrids between species of a genus occur but there are a few between genera. x Heucherella (the x denotes an intergeneric cross but is not sounded) was produced in 1912 at Nancy in France between a Heuchera hybrid and Tiarella cordifolia.
    [Show full text]
  • Weed Risk Assessment for Delairea Odorata Lem. (Asteraceae) – Cape
    Weed Risk Assessment for Delairea United States odorata Lem. (Asteraceae) – Cape ivy Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service September 24, 2013 Version 1 Left: Smothering habit of D. odorata (photographers: Forest and Kim Starr; Starr and Starr, 2013). Right: Leaves and flowers of D. odorata (photographer: Jonathan Boow; Anonymous, 2013). Agency Contact: Plant Epidemiology and Risk Analysis Laboratory Center for Plant Health Science and Technology Plant Protection and Quarantine Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service United States Department of Agriculture 1730 Varsity Drive, Suite 300 Raleigh, NC 27606 Weed Risk Assessment for Delairea odorata Introduction Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ) regulates noxious weeds under the authority of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. § 7701-7786, 2000) and the Federal Seed Act (7 U.S.C. § 1581-1610, 1939). A noxious weed is defined as “any plant or plant product that can directly or indirectly injure or cause damage to crops (including nursery stock or plant products), livestock, poultry, or other interests of agriculture, irrigation, navigation, the natural resources of the United States, the public health, or the environment” (7 U.S.C. § 7701-7786, 2000). We use weed risk assessment (WRA)—specifically, the PPQ WRA model (Koop et al., 2012)—to evaluate the risk potential of plants, including those newly detected in the United States, those proposed for import, and those emerging as weeds elsewhere in the world. Because the PPQ WRA model is geographically and climatically neutral, it can be used to evaluate the baseline invasive/weed potential of any plant species for the entire United States or for any area within it.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Covers for Georgia Landscapes
    Ground Covers for Georgia Landscapes Gary L. Wade, Extension Horticulturist Center: Japanese Spurge. Outside: Dwarf Mondograss Junipers planted on a bank. round covers are spreading, low-growing plants Ground covers are also valued for aesthetic reasons. used in landscapes to cover an area of ground. They soften harsh architectural lines of buildings and TheyG may be woody plants, like junipers, or herba- paved areas. When skillfully interplanted with trees ceous perennial plants, like sedum or daylilies. Gener- and shrubs, ground covers impart a textural balance ally, ground cover plants are evergreen and spread by and unity to the landscape by bridging the gaps be- horizontal stems, stolons (above-ground stems that tween trees and shrubs. root along their nodes) or rhizomes (below-ground creeping stems that spread outward). For the purposes Selecting Ground Covers of this publication, plants that spread by seed or are One of the first considerations when selecting a taller than 3 feet in height are not considered ground ground cover is whether it is cold hardy for the area in covers. which it is to be grown. Georgia has five cold-hardi- ness zones, according the 1990 USDA cold-hardiness Ground covers have many practical uses. Some can zone map. The zones are based on the average mini- be used to control erosion when planted on slopes or mum temperatures of each region of the state. banks. Others are effective lawn substitutes in areas that are too shady to support the growth of grasses or areas that are difficult to mow. Densely growing ground covers also effectively control weeds by block- ing light from reaching the ground.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctostaphylos Hispidula, Gasquet Manzanita
    Conservation Assessment for Gasquet Manzanita (Arctostaphylos hispidula) Within the State of Oregon Photo by Clint Emerson March 2010 U.S.D.A. Forest Service Region 6 and U.S.D.I. Bureau of Land Management Interagency Special Status and Sensitive Species Program Author CLINT EMERSON is a botanist, USDA Forest Service, Rogue River-Siskiyou National Forest, Gold Beach and Powers Ranger District, Gold Beach, OR 97465 TABLE OF CONTENTS Disclaimer 3 Executive Summary 3 List of Tables and Figures 5 I. Introduction 6 A. Goal 6 B. Scope 6 C. Management Status 7 II. Classification and Description 8 A. Nomenclature and Taxonomy 8 B. Species Description 9 C. Regional Differences 9 D. Similar Species 10 III. Biology and Ecology 14 A. Life History and Reproductive Biology 14 B. Range, Distribution, and Abundance 16 C. Population Trends and Demography 19 D. Habitat 21 E. Ecological Considerations 25 IV. Conservation 26 A. Conservation Threats 26 B. Conservation Status 28 C. Known Management Approaches 32 D. Management Considerations 33 V. Research, Inventory, and Monitoring Opportunities 35 Definitions of Terms Used (Glossary) 39 Acknowledgements 41 References 42 Appendix A. Table of Known Sites in Oregon 45 2 Disclaimer This Conservation Assessment was prepared to compile existing published and unpublished information for the rare vascular plant Gasquet manzanita (Arctostaphylos hispidula) as well as include observational field data gathered during the 2008 field season. This Assessment does not represent a management decision by the U.S. Forest Service (Region 6) or Oregon/Washington BLM. Although the best scientific information available was used and subject experts were consulted in preparation of this document, it is expected that new information will arise.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reproductive Biology, Natural Enemies and Biological Control of Delairea Odorata Lem
    The Reproductive Biology, Natural Enemies and Biological Control of Delairea odorata Lem. by Carol Ann Rolando Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the School of Botany and Zoology, University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg, March 2000 ABSTRACT Delairea odorata Lem., an asteraceous perennial vine indigenous to southern Africa, has become naturalised and invasive in many subtropical regions including California, South Australia and Hawaii. Biological control offers a potential long term solution to the management of this species in exotic locations. This study analysed aspects ofthe biology ofD. odorata in its native environment to determine its suitability to classical biological control. To this end an examination of the reproductive biology and natural enemies of D. odorata was made. A study of the pyrrolizidine alkaloid profile was also conducted. Reproductive biology: Delairea odorata reproduces both sexually by seeds and asexually by stolons. The flowering season occurs over the autumn months from April to June. Results ofthe pollination trials indicate thatD. odorata is a cross compatible species and an obligate outbreeder. There is no specialised pollination system and the predorninant pollinators belong to the families Apidae, Syrphidae and Calliphoridae. Following pollination, numerous small achenes are produced. Laboratory trials indicate that these achenes germinate readily between 10 and 25 QC and, although germination occurs in both the light and dark, light clearly stimulates seed germination. Greenhouse trials conducted to determine the effect of light on growth and reproduction indicate that D. odorata is a shade tolerant species which shows plasticity in terms ofgrowth form and deployment ofbiomass in response to changes in light intensity.
    [Show full text]
  • Amorpha Canescens Pursh Leadplant
    leadplant, Page 1 Amorpha canescens Pursh leadplant State Distribution Best Survey Period Photo by Susan R. Crispin Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Status: State special concern the Mississippi valley through Arkansas to Texas and in the western Great Plains from Montana south Global and state rank: G5/S3 through Wyoming and Colorado to New Mexico. It is considered rare in Arkansas and Wyoming and is known Other common names: lead-plant, downy indigobush only from historical records in Montana and Ontario (NatureServe 2006). Family: Fabaceae (pea family); also known as the Leguminosae. State distribution: Of Michigan’s more than 50 occurrences of this prairie species, the vast majority of Synonym: Amorpha brachycarpa E.J. Palmer sites are concentrated in southwest Lower Michigan, with Kalamazoo, St. Joseph, and Cass counties alone Taxonomy: The Fabaceae is divided into three well accounting for more than 40 of these records. Single known and distinct subfamilies, the Mimosoideae, outlying occurrences have been documented in the Caesalpinioideae, and Papilionoideae, which are last two decades from prairie remnants in Oakland and frequently recognized at the rank of family (the Livingston counties in southeast Michigan. Mimosaceae, Caesalpiniaceae, and Papilionaceae or Fabaceae, respectively). Of the three subfamilies, Recognition: Leadplant is an erect, simple to sparsely Amorpha is placed within the Papilionoideae (Voss branching shrub ranging up to ca. 1 m in height, 1985). Sparsely hairy plants of leadplant with greener characterized by its pale to grayish color derived from leaves have been segregated variously as A. canescens a close pubescence of whitish hairs that cover the plant var.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Ord Natural Reserve Plant List
    UCSC Fort Ord Natural Reserve Plants Below is the most recently updated plant list for UCSC Fort Ord Natural Reserve. * non-native taxon ? presence in question Listed Species Information: CNPS Listed - as designated by the California Rare Plant Ranks (formerly known as CNPS Lists). More information at http://www.cnps.org/cnps/rareplants/ranking.php Cal IPC Listed - an inventory that categorizes exotic and invasive plants as High, Moderate, or Limited, reflecting the level of each species' negative ecological impact in California. More information at http://www.cal-ipc.org More information about Federal and State threatened and endangered species listings can be found at https://www.fws.gov/endangered/ (US) and http://www.dfg.ca.gov/wildlife/nongame/ t_e_spp/ (CA). FAMILY NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME LISTED Ferns AZOLLACEAE - Mosquito Fern American water fern, mosquito fern, Family Azolla filiculoides ? Mosquito fern, Pacific mosquitofern DENNSTAEDTIACEAE - Bracken Hairy brackenfern, Western bracken Family Pteridium aquilinum var. pubescens fern DRYOPTERIDACEAE - Shield or California wood fern, Coastal wood wood fern family Dryopteris arguta fern, Shield fern Common horsetail rush, Common horsetail, field horsetail, Field EQUISETACEAE - Horsetail Family Equisetum arvense horsetail Equisetum telmateia ssp. braunii Giant horse tail, Giant horsetail Pentagramma triangularis ssp. PTERIDACEAE - Brake Family triangularis Gold back fern Gymnosperms CUPRESSACEAE - Cypress Family Hesperocyparis macrocarpa Monterey cypress CNPS - 1B.2, Cal IPC
    [Show full text]
  • Plant List and Planting Guidance for Landscape- Based Stormwater Measures
    Appendix BB Plant List and Planting Guidance for Landscape- Based Stormwater Measures Table of Contents B.1 Introduction 1 B.2 General Recommendations 2 B.3 Plants for Stormwater Measures 2 B.4 Planting Specifications 23 B.5 Monitoring and Maintenance 26 B.6 Bay-Friendly Landscaping and Integrated Pest Management 28 B.7 Planting Tips for Single-Family Homes 31 B.8 Nursery Sources for Native Plants 32 References 34 B.1 Introduction The purpose of this appendix is to provide guidance on the planting techniques and selection of appropriate plant materials for the stormwater measures described in this handbook. The plant lists described in this appendix are not prescriptive, but should serve as a guide. In selecting plant materials, it is important to consider factors that influence plant establishment and success, such as microclimate, type of soil, water availability, proximity to saltwater and exposure to sun. Numerous resources are available to assist in selecting appropriate plant species in San Mateo County, including Sunset's Western Garden Book and the East Bay Municipal Utility District’s Plants and Landscapes for Summer-Dry Climates of the San Francisco Bay Region. APPENDIX B B-1 SAN MATEO COUNTYWIDE WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PROGRAM In addition, the function of the individual stormwater measure should be carefully considered when selecting plant materials. Factors to be considered include inundation period, expected flow of water, and The plant lists described in access and maintenance requirements. this appendix are not prescriptive, but should B.2 General Recommendations serve as a guide. In selecting plant materials, it Avoid the use of invasive species.
    [Show full text]
  • Quail-Friendly Plants of North-West Baja California
    RANCHO SANTA ANA BOTANIC GARDEN OCCASIONAL PUBLICATIONS NUMBER 11 QUAIL-FRIENDLY PLANTS OF BAJA CALIFORNIA: AN EXPLORATION OF THE FLORA OF THE SANTO TOMÁS, SAN VICENTE, SAN JACINTO, AND SAN QUINTÍN VALLEYS, CORE HABITAT FOR THE CALIFORNIA QUAIL (CALLIPEPLA CALIFORNICA SUBSP. PLUMBEA) Sula Vanderplank Contributors John Trendler is Curator of Visual Jim Folsom is Director of Huntington Resources at Scripps College and Graphic Botanical Gardens. Jim is the primary and Information Design Consultant. His collaborator on this project. His layout and design work was assisted by assistance with the project development, Winona Bechtle and Nicole Frazer. and the contributions of his employees, made this guide possible. John Macdonald is Photographer at the Barbara Eisenstein is a Native Plant Seed Bank of Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden Consultant from Pasadena. In Gardens. Co-author of “Processing Seeds addition to her participation in field work of California Native Plants”, John has and via image contributions, Barbara contributed seed images for most plants was heavily involved in image selection, in this guide. color correction and formatting. The following people contributed images to this publication after their participation in field work: Cover photos: Quail: (Nueva York, Baja California) Alan Harper © 2011 (alanharper.com) Landscape: (Eréndira, Baja California) Sula Vanderplank Cody Coyotee John Trager is Sean Lahmeyer is This work was made possible by the generous financial assistance of Club La Misión of SanVicente, Baja California, Mexico; the Howard is Curator of Desert Plant Conservation Miller Family Charitable Trust; and the Walter Lantz Foundation. Cost-sharing was graciously provided by Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Conservation Collections at Specialist at the Garden and Huntington Botanical Gardens.
    [Show full text]