DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Queen's Speech

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Queen's Speech Draft Queen’s Speech Standard Note: SN/PC/04398 Last updated: 13 May 2008 Author: Richard Kelly and Paul Lester Parliament and Constitution Centre One of the proposals announced by Gordon Brown on 3 July 2007, in his statement on the Governance of Britain, was that the Government would publish a “provisional legislative programme”. On 11 July 2007, he outlined in a statement to the House of Commons the Government’s first draft legislative programme. He also announced that the Leader of the House was publishing an initial list of proposed legislative measures. Brief details of the progress on the bills listed in the draft legislative programme are reported. This note briefly reviews the reasons why a draft Queen’s Speech was made, and some of the reaction to it. The Modernisation Committee has reviewed the process. It welcomed the publication of the draft legislative programme and supported the Leader of the House’s plan to give the House, its committees and the public longer to consider the draft legislative programme. This note briefly reviews the Modernisation Committee’s report. Finally, the Note reviews the background to the institution of the Queen’s Speech. Contents A. The draft Queen’s Speech in July 2007 2 1. Reaction to the statement in the House of Commons 2 2. Debate on the draft Queen’s Speech 4 B. Why a draft Queen’s Speech? 4 1. Consultation process 6 C. The first draft legislative programme 7 D. Modernisation Committee review of the draft legislative programme 7 E. The draft Queen’s Speech in 2008 9 F. The Queen’s Speech 9 Appendix – The progress of bills announced in the first draft legislative programme 12 A. The draft Queen’s Speech in July 2007 On 3 July 2007, in his statement on constitutional reform, Gordon Brown, the Prime Minister, announced that: I propose that we reinforce the accountability of the Executive to Parliament and to the public with a statement in the summer, prior to the Queen’s Speech, on the provisional forward legislative programme, and this will start this month.1 On 5 July at Business Questions, Harriet Harman, the Leader of the House, confirmed that “It is the Government’s intention to make an oral statement on the content of the draft legislative programme to the House before it rises”.2 On 11 July 2007, Gordon Brown, the Prime Minister, outlined in a statement to the House of Commons the Government’s draft legislative programme. He began by outlining why the Government had decided to announce its plans for forthcoming legislation: For over one and a half centuries, the annual Gracious Address has been drafted inside Government and agreed by the Cabinet far from the public arena, but I believe that it is right, in the interests of good and open government and public debate, that each year the Prime Minister make a summer statement to the House so that initial thinking, previously private, can be the subject of widespread and informed public debate. Today, in advance of final decisions, the Leader of the House is publishing details of our initial list of proposed legislative measures, inviting debate on them in both Houses this month and making provision for region-by-region deliberation and responses.3 The Leader of the House published The Governance of Britain – The Government’s Draft Legislative Programme, on the same day.4 Also on the same day, Harriet Harman announced that “Her Majesty the Queen will open the new session of this Parliament on Tuesday 6 November”.5 1. Reaction to the statement in the House of Commons In response, David Cameron, the Leader of the Opposition, acknowledged that the announcement of a draft legislative programme was meant to be a “great constitutional innovation”. However, he argued that it was a familiar list of bills: I know that it is meant to be some great constitutional innovation, but most of what he announced sounded rather like the Queen’s Speech last year, the year before and the year before that—a long list of Bills, the same priorities and the same failures, and we have heard it all before.6 1 HC Deb 3 July 2007 c817 2 HC Deb 5 July 2007 c1092 3 HC Deb 11 July 2007 c1449 4 Office of the Leader of the House of Commons, The Governance of Britain - The Government’s Draft Legislative Programme, 11 July 2007, Cm 7175, http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm71/7175/7175.pdf 5 HC Deb 11 July 2007 c58WS 6 HC Deb 11 July 2007 c1451-1452 2 In a similar vein, Elfyn Llwyd said that the announcement was “a good idea, but there is more than a whiff of déjà vu about the content”.7 Sir Menzies Campbell also welcomed the innovation, on behalf of the Liberal Democrats, and expressed the hope that more bills would be subject to pre-legislative scrutiny: If these proposals represent a genuine attempt by the Government to consult in advance of the Queen’s Speech, they most certainly should be welcomed, but I say to the Prime Minister that we should be concerned about the quality of legislation as much as we are about the quantity. I hope that he feels it appropriate to ensure that there is much more pre-legislative scrutiny during his time in No.10 Downing Street than there has been hitherto.8 The statement was also welcomed by Graham Allen who asked for all bills to be published in draft and for the Prime Minister to “ensure the fullest pre-legislative scrutiny”. The Prime Minister responded in the following way: The Prime Minister: I am grateful to my hon. Friend, who takes a huge interest in those constitutional matters and has made several very good proposals about how we can improve the workings of the House. Yes, we want more draft Bills for scrutiny before they are given a Second Reading—but it is not always possible to do that, especially in relation to justice and counter-terrorism. However, I hope that the practice can become more widespread, that the House will play a bigger role in examining such matters before legislating, and that over time there will be all-party support for the procedures. My intention is to devolve power from the Executive to Parliament in some vital matters.9 Kenneth Clarke, who chaired the Conservative Party’s Democracy Taskforce,10 welcomed “in principle” the idea of publishing a list of bills that might be included in the Queen’s Speech. He then asked: … Does the Prime Minister agree that if the proposal is to have any practical purpose, as opposed to being just a gesture, it would now be a good idea to refer to the appropriate Committees of the House the question of how much time should properly be allocated to each Bill for debate and scrutiny—and for the Government to contemplate dropping from the programme such Bills as need to be dropped to make sure that we can make a sensible reality of debating and scrutinising Bills without the pressure of totally unrealistic timetables? The Prime Minister: I take on board the right hon. and learned Gentleman’s remarks. I know that he chaired the Conservative party’s constitutional committee, which made several recommendations about the management of business in the House. The Liaison Committee will discuss the matter, and I look forward to its comments. Several Bills have already been published in draft, and that practice will 7 HC Deb 11 July 2007 c1460 8 HC Deb 11 July 2007 c1455 9 HC Deb 11 July 2007 c1458 10 Conservatives, Ken Clarke’s Democracy Taskforce, http://www.conservatives.com/tile.do?def=democracy.taskforce.page 3 increase. There will be a debate in Government time on the draft legislative programme before the summer recess. I hope that there will be a similar debate in the House of Lords. At the same time, it would be good for this country if region by region consultation took place, whereby people in their constituencies and communities could take a view on some of the more controversial measures. Of course the purpose of consultation is listening to what people say, and that means that we must be prepared to make changes as a result.11 Other Members – Jeremy Corbyn, Michael Meacher, George Howarth, Nigel Dodds and Clive Efford – welcomed the initiative.12 2. Debate on the draft Queen’s Speech When she confirmed that the Government would make a statement on the draft legislative programme, on 5 July 2007, Harriet Harman proposed to allow debate on the contents of the programme during the summer recess Adjournment debate.13 Sir Patrick Cormack pressed for a separate debate on the proposed legislative programme, and Ms Harman offered to “take soundings on the best way of dealing with matter”.14 Lynda Waltho asked how select committees and individual Members would be involved in the debate, to which Ms Harman responded: … I have suggested to my right hon. Friend the Member for Swansea, West (Mr. Williams), the Chair of the Liaison Committee, that the consultation with Members and the scrutiny of the draft legislative programme—the programme will be announced by way of a statement of the House—should be undertaken by the Liaison Committee, and he has been good enough to agree that that is what he will do.15 On 12 July, at the following week’s Business Questions, Harriet Harman announced that the draft legislative programme would be debated on 25 July, and that the summer recess Adjournment debate would take place on 26 July.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • View Chamber and Committee Information Document PDF File 0.03
    Friday 7 May 2021 CHAMBER AND COMMITTEE INFORMATION This document is compiled by the Table Office as a guide to events likely to take place in and around the Chamber on Tuesday 11 May. It also includes a list of Select Committee meetings planned for that week. From Wednesday 12 May, the Order of Business and Summary Agenda will be published daily. These and other House business papers can be obtained online or in hard copy from the Vote Office. TUESDAY 11 MAY The State Opening of Parliament will take place. The House will meet at 11.25am for the Queen’s Speech. Due to covid-19 restrictions only the Speaker and invited party leaders and Government and Opposition whips will process to hear the speech delivered in the Lords. All other Members must remain in the House of Commons Chamber and not attempt to join the procession. Afterwards the House will suspend until 2.30pm. After introductory statements by the Speaker, the Outlawries Bill will receive its first reading. This is a purely formal proceeding whereby the House asserts its right to deliberate on matters of its own choosing before those proposed by the Government in the Queen’s Speech: no Bill is produced nor is there any debate. The debate on the Queen’s Speech is then opened. Two backbench Members from the Government side will propose and second a Motion for an Address (thanking the Queen for the Speech), after which the Leader of the Opposition and the Prime Minister will speak. Debate on the Queen’s Speech may continue until 10.00pm on this day.
    [Show full text]
  • Sessional Orders and Resolutions
    House of Commons Procedure Committee Sessional Orders and Resolutions Third Report of Session 2002–03 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 5 November 2003 HC 855 Published on 19 November 2003 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £11.00 The Procedure Committee The Procedure Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to consider the practice and procedure of the House in the conduct of public business, and to make recommendations. Current membership Sir Nicholas Winterton MP (Conservative, Macclesfield) (Chairman) Mr Peter Atkinson MP (Conservative, Hexham) Mr John Burnett MP (Liberal Democrat, Torridge and West Devon) David Hamilton MP (Labour, Midlothian) Mr Eric Illsley MP (Labour, Barnsley Central) Huw Irranca-Davies MP (Labour, Ogmore) Eric Joyce MP (Labour, Falkirk West) Mr Iain Luke MP (Labour, Dundee East) Rosemary McKenna MP (Labour, Cumbernauld and Kilsyth) Mr Tony McWalter MP (Labour, Hemel Hempstead) Sir Robert Smith MP (Liberal Democrat, West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) Mr Desmond Swayne MP (Conservative, New Forest West) David Wright MP (Labour, Telford) Powers The powers of the committee are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 147. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at http://www.parliament.uk/parliamentary_ committees/procedure_committee.cfm. A list of Reports of the Committee in the present Parliament is at the back of this volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Grenzeloos Actuariaat
    grenzeloos actuariaat BRON: WIKIPEDIA grenzeloos actuariaat: voor u geselecteerd uit de buitenlandse bladen q STATE OPENING OF PARLIAMENT In the United Kingdom, the State Opening of Parliament is an the Commons Chamber due to a custom initiated in the seventeenth annual event that marks the commencement of a session of the century. In 1642, King Charles I entered the Commons Chamber and Parliament of the United Kingdom. It is held in the House of Lords attempted to arrest five members. The Speaker famously defied the Chamber, usually in late October or November, or in a General King, refusing to inform him as to where the members were hiding. Election year, when the new Parliament first assembles. In 1974, Ever since that incident, convention has held that the monarch cannot when two General Elections were held, there were two State enter the House of Commons. Once on the Throne, the Queen, wearing Openings. the Imperial State Crown, instructs the house by saying, ‘My Lords, pray be seated’, she then motions the Lord Great Chamberlain to summon the House of Commons. PREPARATION The State Opening is a lavish ceremony. First, the cellars of the Palace SUMMONING OF THE COMMONS of Westminster are searched by the Yeomen of the Guard in order to The Lord Great Chamberlain raises his wand of office to signal to the prevent a modern-day Gunpowder Plot. The Plot of 1605 involved a Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod, who has been waiting in the failed attempt by English Catholics to blow up the Houses of Commons lobby.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parliamentary Calendar
    7 The parliamentary calendar The appointment of the times for the holding of sessions of Parliament, the prorogation of the Parliament and the dissolution of the House, is a matter for decision by the Governor- General. The Constitution states: The Governor-General may appoint such times for holding the sessions of the Parliament as he thinks fit, and may also from time to time, by Proclamation or otherwise, prorogue the Parliament, and may in like manner dissolve the House of Representatives.1 In practice however these vice-regal prerogatives are exercised with the advice of the Executive Government.2 Once a Parliament (session), or a further session within that Parliament, has commenced, the days and times for the routine meetings and adjournments of the House are a matter for the House to decide, yet in practice, by virtue of its majority support, these decisions rest with the Executive Government. The Constitution also provides that the House of Representatives can continue for no longer than three years from the first meeting of the House.3 The significance of this to the concept of a representative Parliament and Government is that a Parliament is of limited duration on the democratic principle that the electors must be able to express their opinions at regular general elections. On the other hand a Parliament of short fixed-term duration may be viewed as undesirable in that too frequent elections have disruptive and/or negative effects on the parliamentary and governmental processes. Of further significance is the principle that Parliament should be neither out of existence nor out of action for any undue length of time.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parliamentary Calendar
    7 The parliamentary calendar The appointment of the times for the holding of sessions of Parliament, the prorogation of the Parliament and the dissolution of the House, is a matter for decision by the Governor- General. The Constitution states: The Governor-General may appoint such times for holding the sessions of the Parliament as he thinks fit, and may also from time to time, by Proclamation or otherwise, prorogue the Parliament, and may in like manner dissolve the House of Representatives.1 In practice however these vice-regal prerogatives are exercised with the advice of the Executive Government.2 Once a Parliament (session), or a further session within that Parliament, has commenced, the days and times for the routine meetings and adjournments of the House are a matter for the House to decide. Yet in practice, by virtue of its majority support, these decisions rest with the Executive Government. The Constitution also provides that the House of Representatives can continue for no longer than three years from the first meeting of the House.3 The significance of this to the concept of a representative Parliament and Government is that a Parliament is of limited duration on the democratic principle that the electors must be able to express their opinions at regular general elections. On the other hand a Parliament of short fixed-term duration may be viewed as undesirable in that too frequent elections have disruptive and/or negative effects on the parliamentary and governmental processes. Of further significance is the principle that Parliament should be neither out of existence nor out of action for any undue length of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY FIFTY- EIGHTH PARLIAMENT FIRST SESSION Thursday, 12 February 2015 (Extract from book 2) Internet: www.parliament.vic.gov.au/downloadhansard By authority of the Victorian Government Printer The Governor The Honourable ALEX CHERNOV, AC, QC The Lieutenant-Governor The Honourable Justice MARILYN WARREN, AC The ministry Premier ......................................................... The Hon. D. M. Andrews, MP Deputy Premier and Minister for Education .......................... The Hon. J. A. Merlino, MP Treasurer ....................................................... The Hon. T. H. Pallas, MP Minister for Public Transport and Minister for Employment ............ The Hon. J. Allan, MP Minister for Industry, and Minister for Energy and Resources ........... The Hon. L. D’Ambrosio, MP Minister for Roads and Road Safety, and Minister for Ports ............. The Hon. L. A. Donnellan, MP Minister for Tourism and Major Events, Minister for Sport and Minister for Veterans .................................................. The Hon. J. H. Eren, MP Minister for Housing, Disability and Ageing, Minister for Mental Health, Minister for Equality and Minister for Creative Industries ........... The Hon. M. P. Foley, MP Minister for Emergency Services, and Minister for Consumer Affairs, Gaming and Liquor Regulation .................................. The Hon. J. F. Garrett, MP Minister for Health and Minister for Ambulance Services .............. The Hon. J. Hennessy, MP Minister for Training and Skills .................................... The Hon. S. R. Herbert, MLC Minister for Local Government, Minister for Aboriginal Affairs and Minister for Industrial Relations ................................. The Hon. N. M. Hutchins, MP Special Minister of State .......................................... The Hon. G. Jennings, MLC Minister for Families and Children, and Minister for Youth Affairs ...... The Hon. J. Mikakos, MLC Minister for Environment, Climate Change and Water ................
    [Show full text]
  • Pro Forma Bills and Parliamentary Independence from the Crown
    Pro Forma Bills and Parliamentary Independence from the Crown by Bruce M. Hicks Historically, before the Speech from the Throne may be tabled, let alone debated, in each chamber of Parliament a private members’ public bill was introduced ‘pro forma’ (meaning for form’s sake). This tradition goes back 400 years in Britain and like many ancient traditions some of its significance has been 2009 CanLIIDocs 308 forgotten over time. In 2008, the Canadian Government broke with that tradition and introduced government bills summarizing the claim of privilege it identified as being enjoyed by each chamber. This paper reviews the history of ‘pro forma’ bills, placing them in their original context so as to show that the claim of privileges and rights, all of which were fought for and obtained before the advent of responsible government and are the cornerstones of the legislative branch of government, are more multilayered than is described in these two new bills. It notes that the very act of substituting these new bills is reflective of the increasing domination of the legislative agenda by the Crown. It concludes by recommending that the new format be modified and that MPs and Senators who are not Ministers or Parliamentary Secretaries be selected as movers for the ‘pro forma’ bill, and that bills be chosen that better embrace the full breadth of rights and privileges claimed by the Commons, the Senate and members of Parliament. he following exchange took place when the Mr. Goodale: Mr. Speaker, dealing with Bill C-1 House of Commons met for the first time in the proceedings at the opening of a Parliament following the 2008 election and the Prime is largely a symbolic gesture, as described in T Marleau and Montpetit, to assert Parliament’s Minister moved for leave to introduce Bill C-1, right to act as it sees fit quite apart from what respecting the administration of oaths of office.
    [Show full text]
  • A Selective Booklist on the House of Commons House of Commons Information Office Factsheet G2
    Factsheet G2 House of Commons Information Office General Series A Selective Booklist on the Revised December 2005 House of Commons Contents Reference works 2 Specific aspects 4 Buildings 4 Devolution 5 This factsheet has been archived so the content Elections 5 and web links may be out of date. Please visit Modernisation and Reform 6 our About Parliament pages for current Organisation and procedure 7 information. Parliament and the media 8 Political parties 9 Standards and ethics 11 Books for younger readers 11 Parliament Explained booklets 12 The following is a list of books which provide Factsheets 13 information on the work and history of the House Contact information 15 Feedback form 16 of Commons and Parliament in general. There are also details of a number of general politics books which may be of interest. They are mainly suitable for adult readers, without, in general, demanding special knowledge of the subject. The list also has a section on books for younger readers. This list is by no means exhaustive. December 2005 FS No.G2 Ed 3.3 ISSN 0144-4689 © Parliamentary Copyright (House of Commons) 2005 May be reproduced for purposes of private study or research without permission. Reproduction for sale or other commercial purposes not permitted. 2 A Selective Booklist on the House of Commons House of Commons Information Office Factsheet G2 Reference works BUTLER, David & BUTLER, Gareth - TWENTIETH CENTURY BRITISH POLITICAL FACTS 1900-2000 [Macmillan; 8th edition; 2000; ISBN 0333772210 (hardback); ISBN 0333772229 (paperback)] Compendium of political, parliamentary and electoral facts and statistics. DOD’S CONSTITUENCY GUIDE 2006 [Vacher Dod publishing; 2005; ISBN 090570259X (paperback)] Local electoral, political, economic and social characteristics for each constituency.
    [Show full text]
  • The Governor General, the Prime Minister and the Request to Prorogue
    Canadian Political Science Review 3(3) September 2009 The Governor General, the Prime Minister and the Request to Prorogue Donald Anton Desserud (University of New Brunswick - St. John)1 Abstract The unusual request to prorogue parliament, made by the prime minister of Canada Steven Harper just prior to a scheduled vote of non-confidence, provoked considerable debate in Canada. This article examines the events leading up to Harper's request as well as the constitutionality of the Governor General's decision to accept it. It argues that the Governor General followed the only reasonable course of action available to her. Looking ahead, it is arguable that the silly coalition, the bully Prime Minister and the uncertain Governor-General have awakened Canadians. (MacGregor 2008) Introduction On February 3, 2009, the amended budget presented by Canada’s Conservative government passed easily with the support of the Liberal opposition.1 Thus ended a remarkable chapter in Canadian parliamentary history, which some were quick to label a “constitutional crisis.” Two events made this episode so noteworthy. The first was the agreement signed by the three parties in opposition – the Liberal party (Liberals), the New Democratic party (NDP) and the Bloc Québécois (Bloc) – under which the Liberals and the NDP, supported by the Bloc, offered to form a coalition government following a promised defeat of the Conservatives on a scheduled confidence motion. The second was the 1 Donald Anton Desserud, Department of History and Politics, University of New Brunswick at St. John, PO Box 5050 Saint John, NB E2L 4L5, [email protected] The Governor General, the Prime Minister and the Request to Prorogue (40-54) 40 Canadian Political Science Review 3(3) September 2009 decision of the Governor General, Her Excellency Michaëlle Jean, to accept Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s request to prorogue parliament, allowing the Conservative government to avoid that same vote.
    [Show full text]
  • House of Commons Background Paper
    Traditions and customs of the House: House of Commons Background Paper Standard Note: SN/PC/06432 Last updated: 2 August 2013 Author: Mark Sandford Section Parliament & Constitution Centre This note outlines a number of the lesser-known and more unusual customs, procedures and behaviours of the House of Commons. It covers aspects of debate in the Chamber of the House; aspects of protocol; and specific traditions. The note looks at various aspects of behaviour in the House of Commons Chamber, including how Members speak in debate and how they are disciplined when they fail to follow procedures and courtesies; how Members must handle relations with one another in and outside the Chamber; matters of dress and attire, both for the Speaker and for other Members; sitting in private; and the use of the term ‘strangers’ to describe non-Members. The note also contains a brief description of the use of the colour green and the symbol of the portcullis by the House of Commons; and the traditional use of the Outlawries Bill at the beginning of each Parliamentary session. This information is provided to Members of Parliament in support of their parliamentary duties and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual. It should not be relied upon as being up to date; the law or policies may have changed since it was last updated; and it should not be relied upon as legal or professional advice or as a substitute for it. A suitably qualified professional should be consulted if specific advice or information is required.
    [Show full text]
  • General Index to the Journals of the House of Commons
    GENERAL INDEX To the Journals of the House of Commons Volume 257, 2000–01 to Volume 266, 2009–10 Ordered, by The House of Commons to be printed 5 July 2017 PRINTED BY ORDER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS PREFACE This General Index to the Journals of the House of Commons, covering 2000–01 to 2009–10, is the twenty-first in a series that began with Erskine May’s extraordinary achievement in indexing the extant Journals from 1547 to 1714. This volume differs from its predecessors in being planned from the outset as a compilation of the Indexes to the Journal of each Session. The advantages in simplifying the preparation of the present decennial Index entail a certain risk that any errors of omission or attribution in an original sessional Index may be inadvertently replicated here. The downward spiral of high prices and dwindling demand for printed copies of the Journal has been mitigated by efforts to make the Journals readily available online. Searching for any text these days generally makes use of a search engine to locate online material and then a Find function within electronic copies of documents. Nevertheless there remains a place for the analytical approach of these Indexes to the Journal which facilitate the swift tracking over decades of precedents which may be affected by the modernisation and evolution of parliamentary procedure. From the 2008–09 Session onwards, the daily Votes and Proceedings began to include information about Questions to and Statements by Ministers among a number of other changes in content and presentation which accompanied the transition to making greater use of software in producing the Votes and Proceedings.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9: the Parliamentary Calendar
    It is a decision of the Governor-General, constitutionally, to dissolve or prorogue, and to appoint the times for the holding of sessions of the Parliament. The Constitution states: The Governor-General may appoint such times for holding the sessions of the Parliament as he ihinks fit, and may also from time to time, by Proclamation or otherwise, prorogue the Parliament, and may in like manner dissolve the House of Representatives.1 In practice however these vice-regai prerogatives are exercised with the advice of the Executive Government.2 Once a Parliament (session), or further session within that Parliament, has commenced, the days and times for the routine meetings and adjournments of the House are a matter for the House to decide, yet in practice, by virtue of its majority, these decisions rest with the Executive Government. The Constitution also provides that the House of Representatives can continue for no longer than three years from the first meeting of the House.3 The significance of this to the concept of a representative Parliament and Government is that a Parliament is of limited duration on the democratic principle that the electors must be able to express their opinions at regular general elections. On the other hand a Parliament of short fixed- term duration may be viewed as undesirable in that too frequent elections have disruptive and/or negative effects on the parliamentary and governmental processes. Of further significance is the principle that Parliament should be neither out of existence nor out of action for any undue length of time. The continuity of the Commonwealth Parliament is assured by several constitutional provisions.
    [Show full text]