DOCSLIB.ORG

Iranian Military Capability Using Open-Source Non-Classified Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Iranian Military Capability Using Open-Source Non-Classified Information 23mm AAA sites around the reactor complex perimitar with the northern side disecting the overall site. There are four Skyguard 35mm AAA systems each with two Oerlikon GDF 35mm cannons and multiple single 35mm and 23mm sites forming aIranian haphazard outer ring. Military Capability 2011 4. Naval Forces Open Source Intelligence Project Independent and objective analysis of current Iranian military capability using open-source non-classified information. Assessments and views expressed represent those of the authors and are not affiliated with any special interest group or political agenda. Version 1.0 Jan 2011 2 About the Project The Open Source Intelligence Project 2011 is an attempt to draw together the most salient bits of currently available Open Source material to piece together a broad and largely complete analysis of Iranian military capability. Open Source refers to unclassified, public sources. The co-authors and reviewers come from a wide range of backgrounds, including in some cases extensive military intelligence experiences and/or relevant specialist knowledge. However, their primary connection is an appreciation and active participation in the Open Source intelligence scene. All those involved have contributed on an amateur/civilian basis. Some have requested to remain anonymous, for various reasons, which we must respect. The project was started in April 2010 and took months of writing, research, drafts and revisions to make it into the form you are reading. We have attempted to provide a single text that will be easy to navigate and digest. However, it is the work of multiple people and this may be apparent in different writing styles and minor formatting differences. We apologize for this, but believe it is inevitable in this type of undertaking. We hope that you find the document interesting and informative – we are hopeful that there is some information and analysis which although open source in nature, is fresh and stimulating to even a highly informed reader. Co-Authors (This Section, no order) · ‘TLAM Strike’ (pseudonym) · Anonymous (1) Main Reviewer/Contributor (This Section) · Anonymous (2) · Anonymous (3) Additional Reviewing Pool (No order) · Sean O’Connor · Anonymous (4) · Galan Wright 3 4. Naval Forces 4.1 Overview History: Iran's navy has though out its history been considered the most minor of its military branches, although it has existed since 500 BC. During the Achaemenid Empire (650-330 BC), the Iranian Navy was very powerful. Its operation to invade Greece under Xerxes easily ranks with the Spanish Armada or Operation Overlord (the “D-Day” invasion) in terms of size, scope and preparation. Its defeat at Salamis by the Athenian navy under Themistocles is one of the critical moments in the Current Iranian Navy formation of western culture, although most only know of this battle is from images of storm tossed Jack ships in the movie “300” about the battle of Thermopylae. The modern Iranian Navy has been plagued by a history of poor organization and limited mission scope until the mid 20th century. Under Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi the Iranian Navy began a modernization campaign drawing equipment from the western powers that resulted in the creation of the top navy in the Region. In 1970 Iran acquired the WWII vintage British warship HMS Sluys a modified Battle class destroyer, this ship was recommissioned as the Artemiz. Despite her age this vessel was the most powerful ship operated by any nation in the region, she joined the four PF-103 class vessels already operated by Iran since the early 1960s. The next year the first Saam class Frigate (latter renamed Alvand class) joined the Iranian Navy, these were the first high quality vessels to be operated by the Iranians. As built they carried five Italian Sea Killer Anti-Shipping Missiles (ASMs), a British Seacat Surface to Air Missile (SAM) system and a Squid Antisubmarine Warfare (ASW) mortar. As the standards of the time went, these were all advanced weapons. The Saams could easily dominate the Gulf or Sea of Oman and operate well in to the Indian Ocean with its Refueling At Sea capability. During this time, the United States also begin providing naval weapons to Iran. Two 1950's vintage Tang class submarine were sold to Iran- USS Trout and USS Wahoo, two more were to follow including USS Tang. Crews for the IINS Kousseh and IINS Nahang, as they were to be named, were trained at the US Navy Submarine School at New London, Connecticut. While at the end of their useful lives, these vessels t would still have provided substantial operational training experience for the Iranians. These submarines never left the U.S. Their crews who were led by royalists, abandoned them when the Shah fell. The U.S. also provided even older Gearing and Allen M. Sumner class destroyers at this time and several Vietnam-era inshore patrol boats. By the late 1970's, the Iranians received a large group of La Combattante-class missile boats armed with the U.S. Harpoon anti-ship missile. Entrusting such a weapon to Iran clearly showed how much the US valued Iran at this time. Four modified Spruance-class destroyers were laid down in U.S. shipyards for Iran, but never delivered. These vessels, which were later called the Kidd-class were to be fitted with the latest weapons systems and were optimized for operations in the Gulf. These were to serve as escorts for a light aircraft carrier equipped with U.S.-manufactured AV-8B Harrier VTOL attack aircraft. German Type 209 submarines were also to be purchased. The only part of this ocean-going strike force that actually made it into Iranian service was the British built replenishment vessel Kharg. When the Shah fell and the current Islamic Republic was created, western support for Iran decreased . The majority of warship transfers were halted; those that were actually transferred were either unarmed auxiliaries or patrol boats with 4 missile systems removed. Iran’s new leaders distrusted the existing military leadership. Arrests and executions of Iranian naval officers suspected of harboring loyalties to the Shah resulted in massive disruptions to the navy's command structure. Moreover, the creation of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy (IRGCN, more formally known as the Navy of the Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution took over part of the naval mission of the Iranian navy, creating a schism in Iran’s naval operational efforts. With the IRGCN’s loyalties perceived as being higher than the regular navy, the Iranian government has continued to favor it over the navy in funding and new equipment. Sensing weakness in Iran, neighboring Iraq invaded, starting an eight- year war that had dramatic consequences for the world. From the start, the Iranian navy was engaged in sporadic fighting, mostly shelling Iraqi forces as they advanced. On November 28, 1980 Iran launched Operation Morvarid. Iranian ships (two missile boats and six amphibious transport vessels) attacked two Iraqi oil rigs that were being used as observation posts, destroying them. These ships went on to blockade Iraqi Current Iranian Naval Ensign. It is the same as their ports. The Iraqi navy responded by dispatching five Osa missile boats and four P-4 national flag torpedo boats. In the resulting skirmish, one Iranian missile boat was sunk, while two Iraqi Osas were sunk and two MiG-23s shot down by missile and gun fire. Iranian air force jets arrived on-scene and destroyed the remaining Iraqi vessels. In the air, the battle was just as one sided, one Iranian Phantom being damaged and another downed, while one helicopter, one MiG-21 and four MiG-23s being downed by F-4 and F-14s. Eighty percent of the Iraqi navy was lost on that day, November 28th, which as a result, is celebrated as Navy Day in Iran. The next phase of the Iran-Iraq war forced the west to directly intervene in the region. In an attempt to disrupt the flow of currency to Iraq, Iranian air and sea forces began to conduct attacks on merchant ships departing Iraq and Kuwait. This operation became known in the west as “The Tanker War” and by the end in 1987, 546 ships had been damaged or sunk and over 320 sailors killed missing or wounded. Iranian forces utilized a variety of methods against the merchant vessels in the region. Naval weapons used during this time ranged from high-tech anti-ship missiles to low-tech mines. Mines proved to be the most effective of all: the U.S. forces in the Gulf which had begun escorting convoys from Kuwait as part of Operation Ernest Will had few countermeasures. U.S. forces spotted the Japanese-built landing ship Iran Ajr was laying mines in the Gulf; U.S. helicopters strafed the ship causing the crew to abandon her. U.S. Naval Special Warfare (SEALs) forces boarded her the next day securing evidence of the mining operation, capturing her crew and then scuttling the ship. Following several clashes between U.S. forces and Iranian Boghammars and Boston Whalers the conflict reached a climax, when USS Samuel B. Roberts struck a mine in the Gulf. U.S. forces retaliated with Operation Praying Mantis. The first target were the two Iranian oil platforms Saan and Siri, which were both destroyed. The Iranian Navy began dispatching ships from Bandar Abbas, but these ships left one at a time, leaving themselves vunerable to being easily intercepted and picked off by U.S. forces. First the missile boat Joshan exchanged fire with a U.S. Task Force and was sunk. Second, the frigate Sahan was sunk after it fired on a U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Iran's Evolving Military Forces
    CSIS_______________________________ Center for Strategic and International Studies 1800 K Street N.W. Washington, DC 20006 (202) 775-3270 To download further data: CSIS.ORG To contact author: [email protected] Iran's Evolving Military Forces Anthony H. Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy July 2004 Copyright Anthony H. Cordesman, all rights reserved. Cordesman: Iran's Military forces 7/15/2004 Page ii Table of Contents I. IRAN AND THE GULF MILITARY BALANCE: THE “FOUR CORNERED” BALANCING ACT..........1 The Dynamics of the Gulf Military Balance ..........................................................................................................1 DEVELOPMENTS IN THE NORTH GULF ........................................................................................................................2 II. IRAN’S ERRATIC MILITARY MODERNIZATION.......................................................................................9 THE IRANIAN ARMY ...................................................................................................................................................9 THE ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARDS CORPS (PASDARAN).................................................................................14 THE QUDS (QODS) FORCES ......................................................................................................................................15 THE BASIJ AND OTHER PARAMILITARY FORCES ......................................................................................................15 THE IRANIAN
    [Show full text]
  • Security & Defence European
    a 7.90 D 14974 E D European & Security ES & Defence 6/2019 International Security and Defence Journal COUNTRY FOCUS: AUSTRIA ISSN 1617-7983 • Heavy Lift Helicopters • Russian Nuclear Strategy • UAS for Reconnaissance and • NATO Military Engineering CoE Surveillance www.euro-sd.com • Airborne Early Warning • • Royal Norwegian Navy • Brazilian Army • UAS Detection • Cockpit Technology • Swiss “Air2030” Programme Developments • CBRN Decontamination June 2019 • CASEVAC/MEDEVAC Aircraft • Serbian Defence Exports Politics · Armed Forces · Procurement · Technology ANYTHING. In operations, the Eurofighter Typhoon is the proven choice of Air Forces. Unparalleled reliability and a continuous capability evolution across all domains mean that the Eurofighter Typhoon will play a vital role for decades to come. Air dominance. We make it fly. airbus.com Editorial Europe Needs More Pragmatism The elections to the European Parliament in May were beset with more paradoxes than they have ever been. The strongest party which will take its seats in the plenary chambers in Brus- sels (and, as an expensive anachronism, also in Strasbourg), albeit only for a brief period, is the Brexit Party, with 29 seats, whose programme is implicit in their name. Although EU institutions across the entire continent are challenged in terms of their public acceptance, in many countries the election has been fought with a very great deal of emotion, as if the day of reckoning is dawning, on which decisions will be All or Nothing. Some have raised concerns about the prosperous “European Project”, which they see as in dire need of rescue from malevolent sceptics. Others have painted an image of the decline of the West, which would inevitably come about if Brussels were to be allowed to continue on its present course.
    [Show full text]
  • Sailor Rest Your Oar! Page 2 the Silent Sentinel, August 2013 U.S
    The Silent Sentinel, August 2013 Page 1 American Submariners Inc. 4370 Twain Ave. San Diego, CA 92120-3404 The Silent Sentinel August 2013 Our Creed and Purpose To perpetuate the memory of our shipmates who gave their lives in the pursuit of their duties while serving their country. That their dedication, deeds, and supreme sacrifice be a constant source of motivation toward greater accomplishments. Pledge loyalty and patriotism to the United States of America and its Constitution. In addition to perpetuating the memory of departed shipmates, we shall provide a way for all Submariners to gather for the mutual benefit and enjoyment. Our common heritage as Submariners shall be Strengthened by camaraderie. We support a strong U.S. Submarine Force. The organization will engage in various projects and deeds that will bring about the perpetual remembrance of those shipmates who have given the supreme sacrifice. The organization will also endeavor to educate all third parties it comes in contact with about the services our submarine brothers performed and how their sacrifices made possible the freedom and lifestyle we enjoy today. VADM Eugene P Wilkinson RADM Paul Lacy Sailor Rest Your Oar! Page 2 The Silent Sentinel, August 2013 U.S. Submarine Veterans San Diego Base Base Commander Membership -- Change of Address Treasurer Bob Bissonnette Ray Ferbrache David Ball 1525 Walbollen Street 2955 lloyd St. 3804 Wildwood Road Spring Valley, CA 91977 San Diego, CA 92117 San Diego, CA 92107-3750 (H) 619-644-8993 [email protected] 619-225-0304 (CELL) 619-251-7095
    [Show full text]
  • Hezbollah's Missiles and Rockets
    JULY 2017 CSIS BRIEFS CSIS Hezbollah’s Missiles and Rockets An Overview By Shaan Shaikh and Ian Williams JULY 2018 THE ISSUE Hezbollah is the world’s most heavily armed non-state actor, with a large and diverse stockpile of unguided artillery rockets, as well as ballistic, antiair, antitank, and antiship missiles. Hezbollah views its rocket and missile arsenal as its primary deterrent against Israeli military action, while also useful for quick retaliatory strikes and longer military engagements. Hezbollah’s unguided rocket arsenal has increased significantly since the 2006 Lebanon War, and the party’s increased role in the Syrian conflict raises concerns about its acquisition of more sophisticated standoff and precision-guided missiles, whether from Syria, Iran, or Russia. This brief provides a summary of the acquisition history, capabilities, and use of these forces. CENTER FOR STRATEGIC & middle east INTERNATIONAL STUDIES program CSIS BRIEFS | WWW.CSIS.ORG | 1 ezbollah is a Lebanese political party public source information and does not cover certain topics and militant group with close ties to such as rocket strategies, evolution, or storage locations. Iran and Syria’s Assad regime. It is the This brief instead focuses on the acquisition history, world’s most heavily armed non-state capabilities, and use of these forces. actor—aptly described as “a militia trained like an army and equipped LAND ATTACK MISSILES AND ROCKETS like a state.”1 This is especially true Hwith regard to its missile and rocket forces, which Hezbollah 107 AND 122 MM KATYUSHA ROCKETS has arrayed against Israel in vast quantities. The party’s arsenal is comprised primarily of small, man- portable, unguided artillery rockets.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling and Analysis of the Submarine Propeller by Using Various Materials
    e-ISSN (O): 2348-4470 Scientific Journal of Impact Factor (SJIF): 5.71 p-ISSN (P): 2348-6406 International Journal of Advance Engineering and Research Development Volume 5, Issue 08, August -2018 MODELING AND ANALYSIS OF THE SUBMARINE PROPELLER BY USING VARIOUS MATERIALS PALLAPOTHU S V R KRISHNA PRASANTH1, DASARI KISHORE BABU.2, 1M.Tech STUDENT, DEPT. OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, AIMS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, AMALAPURAM. 2ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, DEPT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, AIMS COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, AMALAPURAM. ABSTRACT-Composites materials are finding wide spread use in naval applications in recent times. Ships and under water vehicles like torpedoes Submarines etc. Torpedoes which are designed for moderate and deeper depths require minimization of structural weight for increasing payload, performance/speed and operating range for that purpose Aluminium alloy casting is used for the fabrication of propeller blades. In current years the increased need for the light weight structural element with acoustic insulation, has led to use of fiber reinforced multi-layer composite propeller. The present work carries out the structural analysis of a CFRP (carbon fiber reinforced plastic) , (Graphite fiber reinforced plastic ), Nibral propeller blade which proposed to replace the Aluminium 6061 propeller blade. Propeller is subjected to an external hydrostatic pressure on either side of the blades depending on the operating depth and flow around the propeller also result in differential hydrodynamic pressure between face and back surfaces of blades. The propeller blade is modelled and designed such that it can with stand the static load distribution and finding the stresses and deformation, strain, for different materials aluminium, Nibral and Graphite fiber reinforced plastic ,carbon fiber reinforced plastic materials.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Opv En Iberoamérica
    5 CARTAS DE PRESENTACIÓN. 10 LATINOAMÉRICA RESISTE SUS INVERSIONES GLOBALES EN DEFENSA 24 LATINOAMÉRICA, PERSPECTIVAS EN DEFENSA Y SEGURIDAD PARA 2015. 28 LATINOAMÉRICA Y LA BÚSQUEDA DE LA MISIÓN DE SUS FUERZAS ARMADAS. 34 DEMANDA DE AERONAVES DE ALA FIJA. 44 COLOMBIA ORIENTA LA ESTRUCTURA DE SUS FUERZAS ARMADAS A LA GUERRA CONVENCIONAL CON NUEVO MATERIAL DE DEFENSA. 50 PROGRAMAS DE ADQUISICIÓN DE SISTEMAS DE DEFENSA AÉREA EN LATINOAMÉRICA. 58 LOS OPV EN IBEROAMÉRICA. PROGRAMAS Y DEMANDA. 66 PANORAMA DE LOS VEHÍCULOS BLINDADOS A RUEDAS EN LATINOAMÉRICA. 74 PRINCIPALES DEMANDAS DE ARMAS CORTAS Y FUSILES DE ASALTO EN LAS FUERZAS ARMADAS DE AMÉRICA LATINA. 80 ENTREVISTA “BRAHMOS”. EL MISIL DE CRUCERO UNIVERSAL ESTÁ PREPARADO PARA LATINOAMÉRICA. 86 ARGENTINA. 95 BELICE. 97 BOLIVIA. Puerto Príncipe nº 3-B - 1º A 28043 Madrid (España) 101 BRASIL. Tels.: +34 91 382 19 45 / +34 91 382 19 46 Fax: +34 91 763 00 21 112 CHILE. E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.defensa.com 119 COLOMBIA. www.edefa.com Tras años de crecimiento sostenido en los presupuestos destinados a defensa en América Latina, 2015 regis- 127 COSTA RICA. trará un ligero descenso, como efecto directo del recorte en los generales, fruto del desaceleramiento, cuando no Directora: Eva Cervera 130 CUBA. Producción: Luis Viñuelas ([email protected]). Infor- frenazo, de un crecimiento económico que en algunos países de la región había sido imparable en el último lus- mática: Martín Villaverde. Administración: Manuel Cedillo ([email protected]). Distribución: Miguel 133 ECUADOR. tro. En 2014, el gasto en defensa y seguridad en la región registró la cifra total de 71.600 millones de USD, un Martínez ([email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • Hearing National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 Oversight of Previously Authorized Programs Committee on Armed S
    i [H.A.S.C. No. 113–89] HEARING ON NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2015 AND OVERSIGHT OF PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED PROGRAMS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION SUBCOMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE, EMERGING THREATS AND CAPABILITIES HEARING ON FISCAL YEAR 2015 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION BUDGET REQUEST FROM THE U.S. SPECIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND AND THE POSTURE OF THE U.S. SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES HEARING HELD MARCH 13, 2014 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 87–621 WASHINGTON : 2014 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, http://bookstore.gpo.gov. For more information, contact the GPO Customer Contact Center, U.S. Government Printing Office. Phone 202–512–1800, or 866–512–1800 (toll-free). E-mail, [email protected]. SUBCOMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE, EMERGING THREATS AND CAPABILITIES MAC THORNBERRY, Texas, Chairman JEFF MILLER, Florida JAMES R. LANGEVIN, Rhode Island JOHN KLINE, Minnesota SUSAN A. DAVIS, California BILL SHUSTER, Pennsylvania HENRY C. ‘‘HANK’’ JOHNSON, JR., Georgia RICHARD B. NUGENT, Florida ANDRE´ CARSON, Indiana TRENT FRANKS, Arizona DANIEL B. MAFFEI, New York DUNCAN HUNTER, California DEREK KILMER, Washington CHRISTOPHER P. GIBSON, New York JOAQUIN CASTRO, Texas VICKY HARTZLER, Missouri SCOTT H. PETERS, California JOSEPH J. HECK, Nevada PETER VILLANO, Professional Staff Member MARK LEWIS, Professional Staff Member JULIE HERBERT, Clerk (II) C O N T E N T S CHRONOLOGICAL LIST OF HEARINGS 2014 Page HEARING: Thursday, March 13, 2014, Fiscal Year 2015 National Defense Authorization Budget Request from the U.S. Special Operations Command and the Pos- ture of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ship Covers Relating to the Iran/Iraq Tanker War
    THE IRAN/IRAQ TANKER WAR AND RENAMED TANKERS ~ Lawrence Brennan, (US Navy Ret.) SHIP COVERS RELATING TO THE IRAN/IRAQ TANKER WAR & REFLAGGED KUWAITI TANKERS, 1987-881 “The Kuwaiti fleet reads like a road map of southern New Jersey” By Captain Lawrence B. Brennan, U.S. Navy Retired2 Thirty years ago there was a New Jersey connection to the long-lasting Iran-Iraq War. That eight years of conflict was one of the longest international two-state wars of the 20th century, beginning in September 1980 and effectively concluding in a truce in August 1988. The primary and bloody land war between Iran and Iraq began during the Iranian Hostage Crisis. The Shah had left Iran and that year the USSR invaded Afghanistan. The conflict expanded to sea and involved many neutral nations whose shipping came under attack by the combatants. The parties’ intent was to damage their opponents’ oil exports and revenues and decrease world supplies. Some suggested that Iran and Iraq wanted to draw other states into the conflict. An Iranian source explained the origin of the conflict at sea. The tanker war seemed likely to precipitate a major international incident for two reasons. First, some 70 percent of Japanese, 50 percent of West European, and 7 percent of American oil imports came from the Persian Gulf in the early 1980s. Second, the assault on tankers involved neutral shipping as well as ships of the belligerent states.3 The relatively obscure first phase began in 1981, and the well-publicized second phase began in 1984. New Jersey, half a world away from the Persian (Arabian) gulf, became involved when the United States agreed to escort Kuwait tankers in an effort to support a friendly nation and keep the international waters open.
    [Show full text]
  • Peutz Valley September 15 Meeting the Silent Sentinel, October 2018
    Peutz Valley September 15 Meeting The Silent Sentinel, October 2018 The Silent Sentinel, October 2018 USS Seawolf (SS-197) Lost on Oct 3,1944 with the loss of 83 officers and men and 17 US Army troops when she was sunk just north of Moritai by USS Rowell, a Destroyer Escort (DE). In this tragic error, Rowell mistook Seawolf for a Japanese submarine that had just sunk another Destroyer. Seawolf ranks 7th for enemy ships sunk. USS S-44 (SS-155) Lost on Oct 7, 1943 with the loss of 56 men when it was sunk off Paramushiru, Kuriles. S-44 was on her 5th war patrol after attacking a target thought to be a merchant on the surface, S-44 found herself in a losing gun battle with a heavily armed Japanese destroyer. Two men were taken prisoner and survived the war. USS Wahoo (SS-238) Lost on Oct 11, 1943 with the loss of 80 men near La Perouse Strait. Under command of one of the great sub skippers of World War II, LCDR "Mush" Morton, Wahoo was on her 7th war patrol. Wahoo had won a Presidential Unit Citation and ranks 5th in the number of enemy ships sunk. She was lost to depth charges dropped by a Japanese patrol aircraft. USS Dorado (SS-248) Lost on Oct 12, 1943 with the loss of 77 men when she was sunk in the western Atlantic near Cuba. Newly commissioned, she had departed New London and was enroute to Panama. She may have been sunk by a U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • IHS™ Jane's® Land Warfare Platforms
    IHS™ Jane’s® Land WarfarePlatforms System Upgrades 2013-2014 Christopher FFoss &RichardStickland ISBN 978 07106 3086 5-Land WarfarePlatforms Armoured Fighting Vehicles ISBN 978 07106 3087 2-Land WarfarePlatforms Artillery&Air Defence ISBN 978 07106 3088 9-Land WarfarePlatforms Logistics, Support&Unmanned ISBN 978 07106 3089 6-Land WarfarePlatforms System Upgrades ISBN 978 07106 3075 9-Land WarfarePlatforms Full Set ©2013 IHS. All rights reserved. Thirdparty details and websites No partofthis publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any Any thirdparty details and websites aregiven for information and reference purposes means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or be stored in only and IHS Global Limited does not control, approve or endorse these thirdparties any retrieval system of any nature, without prior written permission of IHS Global or thirdparty websites. Further,IHS Global Limited does not control or guarantee the Limited. Applications for written permission should be directed to Christopher Bridge. accuracy, relevance, availability, timeliness or completeness of the information contained on any thirdparty website. Inclusion of any thirdparty details or websites is Any views or opinions expressed by contributors and thirdparties arepersonal to not intended to reflect their importance, nor is it intended to endorse any views them and do not represent the views or opinions of IHS Global Limited, its affiliates or expressed, products or services offered, nor the companies or organisations
    [Show full text]
  • Escalation of Attacks on Shipping and Growing Involvement of Foreign Navies Passage of UN Security Council Resolution Calling for Ceasefire
    Keesing's Record of World Events (formerly Keesing's Contemporary Archives), Volume 33, December, 1987 Iran, Iraq, Page 35597 © 1931-2006 Keesing's Worldwide, LLC - All Rights Reserved. Escalation of attacks on shipping and growing involvement of foreign navies Passage of UN security Council resolution calling for ceasefire Summary and key dates Chartering of Soviet tankers by Kuwait (April 1987). Attacks on Soviet vessels (May). Iraqi attack on USS Stark (May 17). Growing involvement of US Navy in Gulf (May; June). Escalation of mine warfare and attacks on tankers (June-July). Reflagging of Kuwaiti tankers under US flag (July 21). Mine damage to reflagged tanker Bridgeton (July 24). Ordering of European minesweepers and warships to Gulf (August; September). Iranian missile attacks on Kuwait (early September). Attack on UK-registered tanker (Sept. 21). Closure of Iranian arms procurement office in London (Sept. 23). US attack on Iranian mine-laying vessel (Sept. 21). Further exchanges between Iranian and US forces (September-November). Iranian gains in north-eastern Iraq (April to August). Air attacks on cities and on Iranian nuclear installation (September-November). Passage of UN security Council ceasefire resolution (July 20). Reactions to resolution; further diplomatic efforts (July-November). Chartering of Soviet tankers by Kuwait - Attacks on Soviet vessels During late March and early April 1987, Iraq continued to carry out bombing raids against Iranian oil installations at Kharg Island, and also against tankers carrying Iranian oil. It was confirmed in mid-April that Kuwait, a strong supporter of Iraq, and the object of numerous Iranian threats, had chartered three Soviet-registered tankers, which would thereby become entitled to Soviet naval protection.
    [Show full text]
  • The Turkey-UAE Race to the Bottom in Libya: a Prelude to Escalation
    The Turkey-UAE race to the bottom in Libya: a prelude to escalation Recherches & Documents N°8/2020 Aude Thomas Research fellow, Fondation pour la recherche stratégique July 2020 www.frstrategie.org SOMMAIRE THE TURKEY-UAE RACE TO THE BOTTOM IN LIBYA: A PRELUDE TO ESCALATION ................................. 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1 1. TURKEY: EXERCISING THE FULL MILITARY CAPABILITIES SPECTRUM IN LIBYA ............................. 3 2. THE UAE’S MILITARY VENTURE IN LIBYA ................................................................................ 11 2.1. The UAE’s failed campaign against Tripoli ....................................................... 11 2.2. Russia’s support to LNA forces: from the shadow to the limelight ................ 15 CONCLUSION: LOOKING AT FUTURE NATIONAL DYNAMICS IN LIBYA ................................................... 16 FONDATION pour la RECHERCHE STRATÉ GIQUE The Turkey-UAE race to the bottom in Libya: a prelude to escalation This paper was completed on July 15, 2020 Introduction In March, the health authorities in western Libya announced the first official case of Covid- 19 in the country. While the world was enforcing a lockdown to prevent the spread of the virus, war-torn Libya renewed with heavy fighting in the capital. Despite the UNSMIL’s1 call for a lull in the fighting, the Libyan National Army (LNA) and its allies conducted shelling on Tripoli, targeting indistinctly residential neighbourhoods, hospitals and armed groups’ locations. The Government of National Accord (GNA) answered LNA’s shelling campaign by launching an offensive against several western cities. These operations could not have been executed without the support of both conflicting parties’ main backers: Turkey and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The protracted conflict results from both the competing parties’ unwillingness to agree on conditions to resume political negotiations2.
    [Show full text]