Humanitarian Response Fund Ethiopia

Credit: IMC Ethiopia

Annual Report 2012 Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

Table of Contents

Note from the Humanitarian Coordinator ...... 2 Acknowledgements ...... 3 Executive Summary ...... 4 1. Humanitarian Context ...... 5 1.1 Country Map ...... 7 2. Information on Contributors ...... 8 2.1 Donor Contributions ...... 8 3. Fund Overview ...... 9 3.1 Summary of HRF Allocations in 2012 ...... 9 3.1.1 HRF Allocation by Sector ...... 9 3.1.2 HRF Allocation by Region ...... 9 3.1.3 HRF Allocation (by type of Agency and number of projects) ...... 10 3.1.4 Acceptance versus rejection rate ...... 10 3.1.5 HRF Contributions to the HRD ...... 11 3.2 Results of HRF Projects per Cluster / Sector ...... 12 3.2.1. Nutrition: ...... 12 3.2.2 Emergency Food Security and Livelihood: ...... 13 3.2.3 Health ...... 16 3.2.4 WASH ...... 17 3.2.6 Support to Refugees ...... 19 3.2.7 Common Services ...... 20 4. Summary and analysis of achievements ...... 22 4.1) HRF’s Effort in Resilience Building ...... 22 4.2) Strategic Engagement with Clusters ...... 23 4.3) HRF hired new auditors ...... 23 5. Project Monitoring ...... 24 6. Gender Consideration ...... 27 7. Conclusion and Way Forward...... 29 Glossary/Acronyms ...... 31

1 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

Acknowledgements

The Government of Ethiopia: Recognition is extended for the key role the improvements to the process. Their openness and Government of Ethiopia played in enhancing willingness to support the HRF made the HRF team collaboration between different agencies within the very confident in making the Cluster leads and humanitarian community to ensure effective and timely members the focal points for receiving applications and humanitarian response. for their critical engagement in technical reviews of the numerous proposals received for funding. The Cluster Donors: leads were instrumental in taking the lead to review OCHA expresses gratitude to HRF donors for their and compile the comments and recommendations made financial support that allowed rapid responses to by their Review Group members and ensure follow-up critical situations in the country. The HRF is also by the applicant organizations. Appreciation is also grateful for the important role donors played on the extended to agencies that managed supply pipelines Advisory Board. During the year, the United Kingdom (CSB/Oil and RUTF), which were critical in ensuring was the biggest contributor to the HRF, providing 46 minimum preparedness for rapid humanitarian per cent of total funds received for the year, followed response. by contributions of the Netherlands and Sweden with 23 and 16 per cent respectively. OCHA also extends its Implementing Partners: appreciation to the Governments of Norway, The HRF could not have carried out its mandate Switzerland, Ireland, Italy, Spain and Denmark who without the collaboration of its implementing NGO and are amongst our regular contributors to the Fund. UN partners, who submitted proposals to respond to Without the help of our donors the Fund clearly would humanitarian emergencies and helped people survive not have been able to achieve its purpose as a key and rebuild their lives, restoring safety, dignity and player in the humanitarian community. hope among the affected communities. Furthermore, OCHA extends gratitude to those implementing Review Board: partners who actively participated in peer to peer OCHA appreciates the Review Board members who monitoring missions during the year that promoted dedicated their time and expertise to help the HRF cross-learning opportunities. processes work smoothly, efficiently and effectively. In 2012, the Review Board met 28 times to review and OCHA staff and management: deliberate on proposals. Members reviewed Lastly, the HRF team would like to acknowledge applications, engaged in discussions on high-level colleagues in OCHA for their valuable feedback on policy issues, and initiated innovative ideas. The applications and updates from the field, the collective effort of the Review Board members was headquarters (HQ) office in Geneva for its vital in making the Fund transparent and accountable to administrative support including processing all stakeholders. The HRF is grateful to Concern, who Memorandum of Understandings (MOUs) and served as a member of the Board for two years after transferring payments; and OCHA’s Funding which it was replaced by Child Fund. The HRF Coordination Section (FCS) in New York (NY) for benefitted significantly from Concern’s tireless work providing overall guidance and for sharing the pooled and expertise. fund learning process.

Clusters: The HRF team extends its sincere appreciation for the The Cluster leads and their respective members are collaborative support of all stakeholders and looks major contributors to the funding decisions of the HRF; forward to continued partnership in humanitarian their ideas and inputs were most helpful in making programming. valuable

3 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

Executive Summary In 2012, the HRF continued its position in the In 2012, the HRF began implementation of the Global humanitarian response arena, responding to emergency ERF Guidelines. A familiarization workshop was held needs and supporting linkages with resilience building with HRF stakeholders to understand the changes programmes. introduced in policies and procedures. Although the initial introduction met certain delays in agreement Although the year started with a large carryover processing, the guidelines provided a common balance, resources were quickly depleted around May reference tool between the Ethiopia country office and 2012 due to funds provided for needs arising from the HQ. deteriorated food and nutrition conditions mainly in the south and south-eastern parts of the country. The HRF also conducted a number of meetings and workshops during 2012. Earlier in the year, HRF met The HRF allocated US$ 38 million to 66 projects with over 20 National NGOs to discuss ways of across the country. The United Kingdom remained the opening direct access to the Fund. In addition, biggest contributor to the Fund, donating 46 per cent of induction workshops for HRF implementing partners the total funds, followed by Netherlands and Sweden. on the newly effected Global ERF Guidelines and Overall, eight donors provided US$ 27.6 million to accompanying templates were conducted. Furthermore, support emergency life-saving interventions for the the Advisory Board met twice during the year to year. discuss and refine HRF strategies and recommend a way forward for the Fund. The major activities delivered with HRF funding include: During the year, the HRF also hosted the ‘Central  30,561 severely malnourished children and Emergency Response Fund (CERF) Added Value’ 1,823 additional children suffering from mission and a country visit for the first global triennial severe malnutrition with complication were evaluation of ERFs (the Global ERF Evaluation), as treated. In addition, 68,235 children and well as high level visits from FCS in OCHA NY and 76,892 pregnant and nursing mothers the Administrative Services Branch (ASB) in OCHA suffering from moderate acute malnutrition Geneva. The findings of both evaluations were very received treatment; positive with clear recommendations for further  189,041 households were supported through improvement of the pooled funds. seed provision and 86,433 households were targeted for livestock interventions.

Gender consideration in humanitarian programming was applied with expanded integration with national level initiatives led by the Government. Some 80 per cent of the applications were gender coded ‘2’, indicating that the project is designed to “contribute significantly” to gender equality by analyzing and integrating the different needs of women, girls, boys and men in the activities.

During the year, monitoring coverage and quality also improved with results from real-time assessments informing the directions / strategies of project implementation. Furthermore, monitoring results were used to change / influence policies of certain clusters.

The HRF’s governance structures (Advisory Board, Review Board & Clusters) continued to provide strong strategic and technical support in the management of the Fund. The HRF worked particularly closely with Agriculture, Water Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) and Nutrition Sectors / Clusters, to ensure the technical quality of the applications and synergy with national guidelines and procedures.

4 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

1. Humanitarian Context

At the beginning of 2012, the overall food security The dry conditions also depleted ground water sources situation in the country had stabilized due to the and increased pressure on functional water schemes. sustained humanitarian assistance and the start of the Critical water shortages affected over two million meher harvest resulting in improved market supply, people with many areas depending on emergency water and good rains in the pastoral and agro-pastoral areas, rationing. which improved livestock condition. However, with the two months delay of the belg rains (February to The Federal Government of Ethiopia requested regions May), the crops that normally serve to bridge the gap to revise the ‘hotspot priority woreda’ list (district). In until the meher harvest in the fall were extremely May 2012, the Emergency Nutrition Coordination Unit limited and the food security and nutritional situation (ENCU) increased the number of hotspot woredas deteriorated in some parts of the country, particularly from 311 in February 2012 to 371. The increase was the Southern Nationalities, Nations, and Peoples mainly due to the deteriorating food and nutrition Region (SNNPR). Moreover, food prices were at situation in SNNP and Oromia Regions, where a abnormally high levels with the year-on-year overall significant number of woredas were re-classified from country level inflation rate at nearly 30 per cent while the priority ‘2’, to priority ‘1’ category. the food inflation rate increased by more than 36 per cent. The results of the multi-agency belg/gu/sugum seasonal assessment (May 2012) confirmed the failure of the Sharp increases in admissions of severe acute harvest and deterioration in the food security and malnutrition (SAM) were recorded in outpatient nutrition situation in parts of SNNP, Oromia, Amhara therapeutic programme sites (OTPs) and complicated and southern Tigray Regions. In early August, the cases were reported in Stabilisation Centres (SCs), Government of Ethiopia released the HRD for the particularly in SNNP, but also in parts of Oromia, second half of the year, indicating that 3.8 million Amhara and eastern Tigray Regions. SNNPR reported people in 8 regions were acutely food insecure and in a 50 per cent increase in Community-Based need of relief food assistance (68 per cent of food Management of Acute Malnutrition (CMAM) insecure people are living in Somali and Oromia admissions in 2012 as compared to 2011. Nationally, regions). The HRD numbers represented a 35 per cent 67,700 SAM cases were admitted from January to increase in beneficiary numbers as compared with the March 2012, a 20 per cent increase compared to the previous period (January-June). Moreover, WFP’s same time period in 2011. relief pipeline was only 56 per cent funded with a shortfall of more than US$ 208 million. The ability of populations to withstand prolonged dry conditions was further impaired by malnutrition and A significant number of populations are internally insecurity, exacerbating public health threats in many displaced in Ethiopia. The needs of Internally parts of SNNP, Afar, Amhara, Oromia and Somali Displaced People (IDP) are not officially recognized in Regions. Access to basic health care remains low in the general humanitarian structure. In addition to these regions, including prevention and treatment of climate-driven humanitarian concerns (drought and the major causes of child death such as diarrhoeal flooding), conflict-induced displacement regularly diseases, acute respiratory infections and vaccine- results in emergency needs in Ethiopia. Although preventable diseases (measles). generally localized in geographic terms, inter- communal conflicts often impact sizeable populations Elevated cases of malaria in several regions challenged due to the high population density of many parts of the health authorities throughout the second half of 2012. country. Inter-communal conflict between Oromo and Between January and November, more than 1.7 million Somali communities in the Moyale area of southern cases of malaria were reported. Moreover, an upsurge Ethiopia in late July 2012 affected tens of thousands of meningitis cases in Oromia, Tigray and SNNP people and left humanitarian actors struggling to Regions was reported, with outbreaks occurring in respond in a highly politically-charged atmosphere. SNNPR. Chronic poor nutrition combined with poor Overall, some 218,591 individuals were displaced in coverage of routine expanded programme on 2012; 113,085 are still in displacement. These conflicts immunization also significantly contributed to a reportedly stem from community incursions into areas measles outbreak in 119 woredas of Addis Ababa, assigned to one of the ethnic groups after the last Afar, Amhara, Beneshagul Gumuz, Harari, Oromia, referendum (redrawing of administrative boundaries) Tigray, SNNP and Somali Regions. seven years ago.

5 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

Adding to the in-country concern, the refugee and South Sudan. Refugees from Eritrea have also population in Ethiopia more than doubled - from continued crossing into Ethiopia, with an average of 155,000 at the end of 2011 to over 368,000 in 1,000 persons per month. The continued influx and the December 2012. The majority of new arrivals are often alarming conditions of the refugees add constant refugees from Somalia fleeing drought-induced hunger pressure on the government and humanitarian actors in and conflict (nearly 117,000 in the 18-month period), Ethiopia. and Sudanese refugees from Blue Nile State, who fled conflict in the wake of the separation between Sudan

6 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

1.1 Country Map

7 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

2. Information on Contributors

2.1 Donor Contributions In 2012, the HRF received donor contributions of year (Graph 1). Donor contributions for 2012 were around US$ 27.6 million. DFID’s multi-year funding reduced compared to 2011. The significant carryover commitment continued with a contribution of US$ 12.6 of funds from the previous year offset the low million. DFID, Netherlands and Sweden were the top contributions and allowed the HRF to support response three donors of the year. The majority of the to humanitarian needs that emerged during the year as contributions were received in the second half of the articulated in the HRD.

Table 1: Donor Contributions from 2006 to 2012 (USD)

Donor 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total/donor

DFID 8,861,284 7,632,793 28,489,852 11,377,560 17,813,610 12,558,870 86,733,969 Netherlands 5,012,000 3,395,940 25,675,674 15,441,176 9,790,210 6,875,000 6,428,571 72,618,571 Sweden 577,565 4,090,487 6,476,850 3,696,600 6,163,328 4,515,352 25,520,182 Norway 1,553,277 2,022,776 2,656,166 2,232,764 764,059 2,155,207 820,417 12,204,666 Denmark 4,854,369 5,786,640 889,521 11,530,530 Ireland 4,352,603 2,033,133 962,128 1,093,026 8,440,890 Spain 1,347,709 1,506,024 1,221,001 726,744 647,668 5,449,146 Switzerland 247,934 689,852 699,301 1,760,333 618,195 4,015,615 Italy 857,233 1,010,101 709,610 2,576,944 Private donation 93 93 TOTAL 15,674,495 13,629,074 68,159,576 45,631,278 15,471,870 42,952,693 27,571,621 229,090,607

Graph 1: Donors contributions by month - 2012

8 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

3. Fund Overview

3.1 Summary of HRF Allocations in 2012 In 2012, the HRF supported 66 emergency response projects, out of which 55 projects (83 per cent) were implemented by INGOs. INGOs received $23.6 million (62 per cent) of total HRF funds of $37.8 million. In light of the identified gaps and humanitarian needs, the HRF prioritized funding to the nutrition and agriculture sectors, while SNNP and Somali Regions also received a larger share of the funding.

3.1.1 HRF Allocation by Sector The HRF allocated a total of approximately US$ 38 million for multi-sectoral interventions nationwide. Aligning funding strategies with sectoral/cluster priorities, HRF’s response mainly focused on nutrition and livestock/seed interventions totalling US$ 23 million (62 per cent). In addition, the HRF supported emergency responses to refugees in Dollo Ado and Benishangul Gumuz including WASH and nutrition interventions, protection and provision of core relief items. Moreover, 7 per cent ($2,719,898) of HRF funding supported WASH interventions mainly for emergency water supply, sanitation and hygiene interventions.

3.1.2 HRF Allocation by Region The majority of the funding of around US$ 10 (25 per cent), mainly due to poor performance of the million (27 per cent) was channelled to the multiple belg rains that resulted from deteriorated food and regions allocation, which included countrywide nutritional security. The next highest allocation of interventions such as central procurement of CSB approximately US$ 9 million (23 per cent) was made and RUTF used for nutrition interventions. SNNP to the Somali Region. was the highest recipient region with US$ 9.3 million

9 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

3.1.3 HRF Allocation (by type of Agency and number of projects) The HRF supported 66 projects which were were able to access HRF funding. INGOs received implemented by different partners, including INGOs more than 62 per cent of the HRF or approximately and UN agencies. Out of the total projects supported, US$ 24 million which supported response to the 55 projects (83 per cent) were implemented by INGOs different humanitarian needs in the country. and 11 projects (17 per cent) by UN agencies. Through partnership with INGOs and UN agencies, NNGOs

By partner type in US$ Number of UN and INGO Projects

UN Agencies 14,248,724 UN Agencies 11 International NGOs 23,746,952 International NGOs 55 Total 37,995,676 Total 66

3.1.4 Acceptance versus rejection rate The HRF received a total of 78 applications in 2012 compliance with agreed priorities, deviated from out of which 85 per cent were approved for funding. guidelines, etc) and rejection by the Review Board for The remaining were not funded due to the following: not meeting standards and value for money not meeting the HRF basic criteria and guidelines, considerations. unfavourable support from the cluster (eg. no

UN NGO Total Applications Received 12 66 78 Applications Rejected 1 11 12 Applications Approved 11 55 66 Acceptance rate (%) 92% 83% 85%

10 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

3.1.5 HRF Contributions to the HRD During the first half of 2012, HRF contributions to the non-food net requirement identified in the HRD totalled US$ 10 million. Out of the net requirement for the non-food sectors, the HRF allocated 41 per cent for Nutrition, 20 per cent for Agriculture, 14 per cent for WASH and 9 per cent for Health sectors. In addition, an allocation of US$ 5.7 million was carried over to the second half requirement of the Nutrition sector (i.e. July-December).

In the second half of 2012, the HRF’s contribution increased to the different sectoral needs identified in the HRD. Out of the non-food net requirement of US$ 40 million, the HRF contributed approximately US$ 12 million (30 per cent). The HRF’s contribution to the Non-Food sectors included Health (18 per cent), Nutrition (66 per cent), WASH (17 per cent), Agriculture (28 per cent) and Education (6 per cent).

In addition, of the total requirements (US$ 218.8 million) outlined in UNHCR’s 2012 appeal for non-food assistance for refugees, the HRF provided nearly US$ 3 million (3 per cent of the appeal).

11 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

3.2 Results of HRF Projects per Cluster / Sector

3.2.1. Nutrition: The HRF responded immediately to reports of alarming increases in admissions of severe acute malnutrition cases in Outpatient Therapeutic Programme sites (OTPs) and complicated cases in Stabilization Centres (SCs), particularly in SNNP, but also in parts of Oromia, Amhara and eastern Tigray Regions.

The HRF supported 22 emergency nutrition interventions in SNNP, Oromia, Amhara and Somali regions. Some 22 per cent of the response was concentrated in SNNPR. HRF implementing partners supported the outpatient treatment of 30,561 severely malnourished children and 1,823 more severely Mother trained on nutrition and safe hygiene and sanitation malnourished children requiring inpatient care. practices, East Hararghe Zone, Oromia region (Photo by IMC, 2012)

The response was complemented by support to centrally managed procurement of RUTF, CSB and interventions are required to be integrated into and Vegetable Oil. These centrally managed supplies were capacitate existing structures. In addition, the HRF designed to further strengthen the quality of emergency continued supporting nutrition response projects nutrition programmes. integrated with WASH activities, which improved the delivery of a multi-sectoral response, ensuring a UNICEF and WFP received over US$ 8 million in sustainable approach. 2012 to secure the pipelines. The HRF supported the procurement of 64,920 Cartons of RUTF, 4,434 metric During on-site monitoring, the HRF observed well- tons (MT) of CSB and 628 MT of Vegetable Oil supported out-patient care facilities for children through WFP and UNICEF’s central procurement and admitted to OTPs for the treatment of severe acute distribution channels. malnutrition in some woredas of Amhara and SNNP regions. However, in some instances the treatment of Partners implemented nutrition responses, aligned with cases of moderate malnutrition was delayed and the government strategy of Community based resulted in lack of a proper follow-up in weight gains Management of Acute Malnutrition (CMAM), where brought about as a result of interventions.

Implementing Number of projects Budget in US$ Geographic Area agencies

22 14,804,346 WFP, UNICEF, SCI, CARE, Plan, Afar, Amhara, Concern, Child Fund, IMC, UNICEF, Benishangul Gumuz, ACF, GOAL and Merlin Gambella, Oromia, SNNP, Somali and Tigray Regions Outputs

■ Total number of beneficiaries: 332,262 ■ Gender consideration : 105,685 Women, 59,300 Girls, 28,450 men and 47,109 boys ■ 30,561 children with SAM (11,520 girls and 11,043 boys) treated ■ 1,823 children with SAM with complication (769 girls and 708 boys) treated ■ 68,235 children with MAM (28,909 girls and 24,948 boys) treated ■ 76,892 pregnant and breast feeding women received nutritional support ■ 619 MT of RUTF, 5,516 MT of CSB and 276,715 Liters of Vegetable Oil distributed ■ Central procurement of 64,920 cartons of RUTF, 4,434 MT of CSB and 628 MT of oil

12 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

■ 1,471 Health extension workers trained ■ 529 SC and OTP sites received NFI Kits ■ 76,299 people received health education Note: The disaggregated data does not add up to the total as inputs from implementing partners are incomplete

3.2.2 Emergency Food Security and Livelihood: In 2012, the HRF strategy prioritized livelihood- poor belg and sapie seasonal rains, leading to related interventions in areas with a history of repeated widespread malnutrition. Given the contraction of food insecurity and high levels of malnutrition. A coping capacities, the failure of rains often reduced linkage was created between nutrition projects and food availability for smallholder farmers. Furthermore, resilience building activities focusing on nutrition the failure of these two major seasonal rains in SNNPR hotspot woredas and targeting of families with forced farmers to relinquish their ability to maintain the malnourished children in treatment centers (OTPs & root crop seed for cultivation. SCs). Unlike earlier interventions, where the response was The HRF financed joint consortium seed / root tuber solely focused on the treatment of malnutrition, a response projects to reverse the cyclic problem in different intervention was put in place. In addition to SNNPR. The projects provided earlier and more providing lifesaving response to children and breast appropriate livelihood interventions for smallholder feeding mothers, CRS’ seed response targeted these farmers that suffered from consecutive poor rains in same families with a durable solution, assisting them to 2011 and 2012. re-establish access to sweet potato cuttings.

The HRF also supported 15 emergency seed / tuber and CRS further strategically expanded its targeting to planting material projects that benefited 189,041 unemployed youth identified among the families of households with 32.8 MT of seed. Despite initial smallholder farmers who had lost their sweet potato delays in procuring quality seeds and some challenges seed. The unemployed youth were organised and in targeting, the overall project performance observed provided with a nursery garden to help the local during the monitoring mission was deemed as propagation and ensure the reestablishment of the root satisfactory. crop. To improve the nutritional condition and creating income, the project ensured access to sweet potato seed Best Practice: Seed/tuber response in SNNPR – in local nurseries at a reasonable cost. Catholic Relief Service (CRS) For two consecutive years, smallholder farmers lost their important root crop (sweet potato) as a result of

Implementing Number of projects Budget in US$ Geographic Area agencies

15 5,175,337 FAO,CRS, FHE, GOAL, SNNP, Oromia and WV,CONCERN, Child Fund, IMC Amhara Regions Outputs

■ Total of 189,041 beneficiaries (31,046 Female and 158,355 Headed Households) ■ 12.3 MT of wheat, 4.7 MT of Teff, 0.9 MT of Chickpea, 11.3 quintals of Haricot Bean, 3.6 MT of Lentils, 40,253,907 millions of sweet potato cuttings distributed covering 11,152 hectare of land ■ 11,637 farmers and 55 agricultural extension workers trained Note: The disaggregated data does not add up to the total as inputs from IPs are incomplete

 Drought Response in pastoralist areas – Afar, Somali and Oromia Regions Pastoralist areas continued to experience the spillover movements of pastoralist populations with their effects of the 2011 drought, particularly in Afar, livestock. Oromia (Borena) and Somali Regions. The failure of the pastoral rains (sugum/gu) further exacerbated food HRF continued its support during the year with insecurities, resulting in severe water shortages, early interventions focusing on animal health, diversification depletion of pasture and browse, and abnormal of income and emergency destocking.

13 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

Innovation – The VSF Germany project in Afar, enhancement training including skinning was provided ‘Improved food security through nutrition based to the women slaughter groups and linkage with livestock off-take and livelihood protection for licensed skin traders was established in the area. More vulnerable pastoralist communities in Afar Region’, than 1,600 sheep and goat skins were presented for sale was developed following the poor performance of both to local skin traders and a total of 24,000 Birr (US$ the sugum and karma rains in 2011/12. 1,100) obtained by the slaughter women groups. Furthermore, the intervention supported a diversified VSF Germany distributed meat through a voucher approach including animal health service, community scheme to the most vulnerable households, who have animal health workers (CAHWs) training, vaccination, lost most of their livestock during the drought and and promotion of income generating off-take. hence remain severely food insecure during the project period. The approach had a threefold benefit: 1) improved diet for beneficiary households, 2) increased income to community members from sale of livestock 3) maintained and supported local markets.

Some 500 severely food insecure households (HHs) received 5 kg of meat weekly (total 30,000 kg/12weeks) through vouchers for a period of three months to complement their food basket. The meat was locally sourced from existing butchers or, when not available, from the relevant communities though a communal slaughter carried out on a weekly basis.

VSF Germany established a total of 12 women slaughter groups to supply fresh meat to targeted beneficiaries in the two project woredas. All animals brought by slaughter groups are put through ante Beneficiary Testimony: Halima, a mother of five, mortem examination on the slaughter day. Slaughter project beneficiary from Afdera, Afar Region group members actively participated at different stages “...... I gave birth to a baby girl three months before in slaughtering activities including skinning, chopping, the start of this project. I could not, however, feed my cleaning, weighing and distribution of the 5 kg meat child milk as my breasts were dry. I also lost all my for each of the selected households (HHs.) goats to the drought. I was feeding my child water with sugar. When this project started, I was selected as a VSF Germany also provided direct cash transfers poor family and started getting 5kg of meat per week approximating US$156,363 to the local community for my family of 7. In the first week, when I got 5 kg of through payment for the women’s slaughter groups. At meat, I tried to remember the last time I had such food least 750 households benefited from this cash transfer. in my house ... but I couldn’t... it was long ago, maybe 7-10 years, when we had livestock. Even in those days, VSF’s approach of nutrition based livestock off-take unless we have some special occasions, we did not injected cash to the community and reduced pressure slaughter animals often for meat. We prefer to have on depleting natural resources in particular water and them all for milk or sell them for cash. I was very pasture through reduced numbers of livestock happy to receive the meat especially for my infant and available. Unlike traditional response to drought with a three other young children. We even brought back focus on a clinical approach for treatment of home our oldest son (age 10), who was staying with malnutrition cases, the project aimed to supplement the well-off relatives. food basket of the drought affected households and I saw the change in my children after eating the meat augment the income of vulnerable communities which and soup. What surprised me the most was the change are both livelihood-based responses to drought. I observed on myself. Before I was weak, tired and felt Additionally, the project facilitated the creation of sick all the time, but now I am strong and have started market linkages between the slaughter groups and local breast feeding my child. Thanks to Allah and the skin traders increasing income opportunities for project for saving my child and my entire family.” beneficiaries. Prior to the slaughtering activity, skill

14 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

Implementing Number of projects Budget in US$ Geographic Area agencies

8 3,246,669 VSF Germany, VSF Suisse, Bread for Somali, Afar, Oromia and the World, ADRA, GOAL and FHE Amhara Regions Outputs

■ Total number of beneficiaries: 86,433 Households (18,650 Female headed and 58,333 Male headed Households) ■ 21,828 livestock received survival feed ■ 12 9 metric tons of Concentrate feed purchased and distributed ■ 1,453,878 livestock treated/dewormed ■ 1,602,617 livestock vaccinated ■ 1,782 livestock destocked (Commercial) ■ 230 animal health workers trained Note: The disaggregated data does not add up to the total as inputs from IPs are incomplete

 Flood Response: The Amhara Region remained vulnerable to floods. Mrs. Zebiba Aragaw lives with HIV/AIDS and is a Although major prevention works, such as the HRF widow with two children. She was among the flood mitigation project from 2009, significantly households displaced by the 2010 flood in which she contributed in minimizing the impact of extensive lost all her assets. She sells kollo [roasted barley] on flooding in areas surrounding Lake Tana, flash floods the street to feed her children. continue to pose threats. In 2012, flooding was reported in pockets of North Wollo, North Gondar, “Without this project and the will of the creator, I East Gojam and West Gojam zones of Amhara Region. would not have been alive by now,” said Mrs. Zebiba, The floods affected close to 4,200 households and who is currently working as a daily laborer at damaged large hectares of farmlands. Wurgessa Gabion construction site.

During the year the HRF allocated over US $1.4 “This project has transformed me. It has changed me a million to support two flood mitigation projects in lot. I have started to send my children to school. I have Amhara. These interventions focused on the also bought a mobile phone, tape recorder and a metal construction of physical and biological measures to bed. I have also saved 1,500 Birr (~US$ 100) at the prevent flooding. The interventions targeted 136,875 women’s saving group. I am happy and enjoying life people and assisted in the construction of 166,514 more than ever before.” “I was the victim of the flood kilometers (km) of embankment, 26,586 m of gabion, that affected Wurgessa kebele. My house and all my and the planting of 15,500 tree seedlings. property were taken by the flood three years ago. I was relocated by the government to another place. Now, Best Practice – Disaster Risk Reduction – Flood thanks to your support and the almighty, I and my Mitigation project in Eastern Amhara – World neighbors are sleeping freely without worrying about Vision and FAO flooding. I value this more than the money I earn by FAO and World Vision implemented flood mitigation working on the project. I am now living like a human response, innovatively implementing integrated being! I am really happy,” she acknowledged. physical and biological approaches including rivers old course de-siltation/excavation and gabion work to strengthen the rivers embankment, and biological activities such as tree planting and area closure in Eastern Amhara region (Antsokia Gemza, Shewa Robit and Ephrata Gidim woredas). The project reduced the negative impact of floods and risks of displacement of 62,175 people. The project also increased access to 8,000 hectares (ha) of crop land and 1,500 ha of pasture for livestock production.

Beneficiary Testimony: Mrs. Zebiba Aragaw, Wurgessa Kebele, Habru Woreda, North Wollo Zone Beneficiary of the Flood Mitigation project, North Wollo Zone, Amhara region (Photo by FAO, 2012)

15 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

Implementing Number of projects Budget in US$ Geographic Area agencies 2 1,400,000 FAO and World Vision Amhara Region Outputs

■ Total number of beneficiaries: 136,875 individuals ■ Gender consideration : 52,623 Women, 16,940 Girls, 50,824 Men and 16,488 Boys ■ 27,375 households, 8,000 hectares of farm lands and 1,500 hectares of grazing land protected from flooding; ■ 166,514 km of embankment and 26,586 m3 Gabion structure built; 671 kg of seeds, 15,500 seedlings; 27,750 cuttings of biological measures used to minimize flood damages; ■ 850 flood mitigation tools purchased and distributed; ■ 1,196 members of the community participated in capacity development work. Note: The disaggregated data does not add up to the total as inputs from IPs are incomplete

3.2.3 Health Malnutrition and food insecurity coupled with a poor Best Practice: – Health Response in Somali Region - primary health care system exacerbated public health Mercy Corps threats in most parts of Afar, Amhara, Oromia, SNNP As part of its health and nutrition response, Mercy and Somali Regions. Localized outbreaks of meningitis Corps deployed a mobile health and nutrition team were reported in Kembatta Tembaro, Wolayita, Hadiya which is credited for providing primary health care zones, and Halaba Special Woreda in SNNPR. Adding services in remote areas of Somali Region where to the concern was that the HRD issued early in 2012 primary health service coverage is minimal. Mercy did not reflect any requirement for a response to the Corps’ Mobile Health and Nutrition (MHNT) operated ongoing health threats or the needed resources to the in traditionally conflict affected areas of Somali anticipated large meningitis outbreak in high risk areas Region, bordering Oromia Region. The operation of the country. benefited bordering kebeles of Oromia as well and improved interaction between conflicting communities. The HRF during the year expanded its support to the The project also innovatively enhanced the Regional health sector supporting efforts to disease outbreaks Health Bureau’s (RHB) capacity by attaching two to (meningitis), response to hazards (displacement) and three staff (nurses / health extension workers) to each capacity building of local structures. The HRF MHNT for a one month rotation. supported WHO’s mass meningitis campaign with US$1 million, complementing a CERF Rapid During the period, the RHB staff received valuable on- Response Grant of US$ 2.9 million to respond to the the-job training by working closely and under the close meningitis outbreak in SNNPR. supervision and monitoring of Mercy Corps staff.

The HRF’s meningitis response focused on support to a mass vaccination campaign targeting 850,000 at-risk populations between the ages of 2 and 30 years. The wide vaccination coverage resulted in containment of the upsurge of cases with minimum mortality. Moreover, Mercy Corps and Merlin provided primary health care services in Somali and Oromia Regions.

16 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

Implementing Number of projects Budget in US$ Geographic Area agencies

3 1,324,402 WHO, Merlin and Mercy SNNP and Somali Corps Regions Outputs

■ Total number of beneficiaries: 1,544,975 individuals ■ Gender consideration : 784,172 Women and 749,486 Men ■ 850,000 individuals were vaccinated against Meningitis ■ 128,285 children were vaccinated against Measles ■ 400 female health extension workers were trained Note: The disaggregated data does not add up to the total as inputs from IPs are incomplete

3.2.4 WASH Critical water shortage severely affected more than two The project utilized a participatory approach, million people in Borena, Bale, East and West Harerge Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTHS), which (Oromia), Tselemet and East Belesa woredas of North helped to equip the communities and local authorities Gondar zone, Shenkora in Northa Shewa zone with long-term skills to maintain new and rehabilitated (Amhara), and the dry belts of north, north-west, north- water systems and continue safe hygiene practices east and eastern parts of Afar, central and southern (such as awareness on the risks of open defecation Somali and eastern Tigray Regions. Additionally, low practices). These are expected to help counter future levels of sanitation coverage, poor personal hygiene outbreaks of water-borne diseases such as AWD. practices, inadequate supplies of clean water, lack of Communities and health workers worked together with community awareness and chronic water shortages IRC project staff to build facilities (including latrines) contributed to an upsurge of diarrhoeal diseases using local materials. including Acute Watery Diarrhoea (AWD). Beneficiary Testimonies: Excerpt from OCHA HQ The HRF supported seven NGOs to undertake WASH field mission report response in Somali, SNNPR, Oromia and Afar Expressing the positive impact of IRC’s WASH Regions. To increase safe water coverage and improve response, a community elder in Dekero kebele in the livelihood of the affected population, the HRF Bensa woreda of Sidama zone stated, “Our life has supported construction of new water schemes and changed. We get everything from the activities (such as rehabilitation and/or maintenance of existing water hand pumps, chemicals, and buckets); each household systems including boreholes and provision of water has their own latrine as well as access to roadside treatment chemicals. Additionally, emergency water latrines. All in the community are happy.” rationing was conducted to areas with critical shortages including in Somali Region.

Best Practice: WASH Response in SNNPR – International Rescue Committee (IRC) Sidama Zone experiences recurrent AWD outbreaks as many kebeles within this zone are affected by ongoing severe drought. Lack of access to clean water, low latrine coverage, poor personal hygiene and sanitation, and inadequate safe water supplies are factors which lead to AWD outbreaks.

IRC used HRF funding to build and/or rebuild clean water sources, promote hygiene awareness and practices in the communities, and fill service delivery Health Extension Workers and woreda leaders practicing capacity gaps within the local government health and tippy tap hand washing model on CLTSH training, water offices. Yirgalem Fura Training Institute, SNNPR (Photo by IRC, 2012)

17 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

Women and children in the community were equally participatory hygiene promotion and AWD prevention positive about the intervention. “All women are and response activities and directly work with the participating in this project and activities and are communities in targeted kebeles. highly involved and encouraged,” said a female Health Extension Worker (HEW) who works in the kebele to A child from the community attested to the hygiene promote hygiene awareness and practice in the awareness, which is promoted in nine schools in three communities. HEWs are trained by IRC on target woredas. “I learned that practices such as hand- washing are very important to personal hygiene.”

Implementing Number of projects Budget in US$ Geographic Area agencies

9 2,177,639 Oxfam GB, IRC, Bread for the World, Somali, SNNP, Oromia ADRA, COOPI, IMC and Plan and Afar Regions International

Outputs

■ Total number of beneficiaries: 362,866 individuals ■ Gender consideration : 109,582 Women, 7,800 Girls, 106,693 Men and 8,399 Boys ■ A total of 23 water points rehabilitated ■ 30 Water points are constructed. ■ A total of 10,790 HH latrines and 7 Institutional latrines constructed ■ Some 18,799,000 liters of water distributed; 170,204 sachets of pur, 8,680 bottles of wuhagar, 50,772 water tabs, 68,000 strips of aqua tabs distributed to treat 5,140,080 liters of water; 46 water tanks, 2,068 jerry cans, and 38,600 bars of soap distributed. ■ 838 WASH Committees trained. Note: The disaggregated data does not add up to the total as inputs from IPs are incomplete

3.2.5 Support to Displaced People Inter-communal conflict between Oromo and Somali The HRF supported prioritized emergency WASH communities in the Moyale area (bordering Kenya) of interventions including rehabilitation of water sources, southern Ethiopia affected tens of thousands people in storage and distribution points. Primary health facilities late July 2012. The conflict claimed lives and damaged damaged by the conflict were also rehabilitated. livelihoods and infrastructure including health and Moreover, basic household supplies and basic bedding water facilities. Additionally, conflict between the materials were distributed to conflict affected Borana and Gabra communities in northern Kenya communities. displaced 29,211 Kenyans into Ethiopia (Moyale woredas, Oromia and Somali Regions) in January The interventions benefitted 25,405 IDP households in 2012. Response to the caseload was effected as Hudet, Moyale, Filtu and Dheka-Suftu woredas ‘displaced communities’ as there was some resistance (Somali and Oromia Regions). from the Government and UHNCR to recognize them as refugees. Overall, some 218,591 individuals were displaced in 2012.

18 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

Implementing Number of projects Budget in US$ Geographic Area agencies

7 3,718,065 Oxfam GB, IOM, ZOA, COOPI and Somali and Oromia Merlin Regions Outputs

■ Total number of beneficiaries: 25,405 households NFI ■ A total of 34,572 blankets, 20,156 plastic sheets, 7,510 Shelter materials, 31,514 jerry cans, 153,916 soap, 21,678 plastic basins, 36,448 plastic plates, 29,328 plastic cups, 18,214 plastic jugs, 18,214 cooking pots, 13,714 aluminum ladles, 21,192 mosquito nets, 2,978 sleeping mats, 59,560m of rope, 2,978 hessian bags purchased and distributed WASH ■ A total of 10,988,000 liters of water treated using 18,000 bottles of water treatment chemicals and distributed, one water point rehabilitated and another one constructed, 1,058 house hold latrines and 2 institutional latrines with hand wash facility was constructed Health ■ 293 number of AWD cases treated, 16 health extension workers trained, 46 on the job training and supportive supervision sessions carried out at health posts, 51 OPD sessions carried out by mobile health teams and 3,468 recipients of health education and health promotion messages delivered by mobile health teams

Note: The disaggregated data does not add up to the total as inputs from IPs are incomplete

3.2.6 Support to Refugees

Continued ethnic clashes between the Lou Nuers and Beneficiary Testimony: Tongo Camp, Benishangul Murle in Jonglei State of South Sudan resulted in a Gumuz Region large influx of Lou Nuer refugees in Gambella and “When I arrived in Tongo camp a few months ago, Benishangul Gumuz Regions throughout 2012. getting water for drinking and washing was Additionally, the first round of the disarmament challenging,” said Tisabe Ahameed, beneficiary from campaign in March 2012 caused insecurity resulting in World Visions’ Tongo Emergency Response Program. some community members fleeing and hiding among kin groups in border villages of Gambella, with several renewed inter-communal conflicts. According to UNHCR, Ethiopia has received 91,282 Sudanese refugees since the conflicts began.

Moreover, continued insecurity and growing food security problems due to poor rains resulted in constant surge from Somalia. This underscored the need to establish a sixth camp in the Dollo Ado area, and expansion of services in the existing five camps.

The services and infrastructures in the western and eastern camps need further development and upgrading to meet basic standards. In addition, the temporary shelters established in Benishangul Gumuz following Beneficiary of the WASH response project, Tongo Camp (Photo by World Vision, 2012) the Sudanese influx lack basic facilities and services, including water, sanitation and health. “This is my second time to come to Ethiopia as refugee, but I have never seen such kind of The HRF allocated nearly US$ 3 million to support humanitarian service, where water was provided near four projects implemented by UNHCR, World Vision, our tents through permanent water structures. The IMC and GOAL for operations in the western and water is pure and is enough for drinking, food eastern refugee settlement areas of the country. preparation, and for keeping our personal hygiene. ”

19 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

Tisabe, 23 years old, lives in Tongo camp with her Renewed fighting forced tens and thousands of mother and her four children. They fetch four jerry Sudanese to flee to neighbouring Ethiopia, with an cans of water per day for cooking food, washing average daily rate of 200-300 Sudanese refugees. The clothes and household material and for personal Tongo camp accommodates 14.18 per cent of the total hygiene. Including Tisabe, the project addressed the number of Sudanese refugees in Ethiopia, which needs of 12,946 refugees (4,497 HHs) residing in increases at about 1.49 per month. Tongo camp, of which 55.6 per cent are women.

Implementing Number of projects Budget in US$ Geographic Area agencies

4 2,941,803 UNHCR, World Vision, IMC and GOAL Benishangul Gumuz and Somali Regions Outputs

Nutrition ■ Total number of beneficiaries : 15,000 individuals ■ 1,041 Children with SAM (544 girls and 497 boys) treated ■ 3,870 children with MAM (1,916 girls and 1,954 boys) treated ■ 2,244 pregnant and nursing MAM mothers treated ■ 31,742 (15,137 boys and 16,605 girls) children fed with blanket supplementary feeding WASH ■ Total number of beneficiaries : 42,942 individuals (20,759 women, 3,144 girls, 15,219 men and 3,437 boys) ■ 11 water points and pipe line extension constructed ■ 280 House Hold latrines and 1 hand wash facility constructed ■ 6 Institutional latrines constructed, 3 Institutional latrines rehabilitated, 289 solid waste collection points established ■ 4,064 jerry cans distributed ■ 20 sanitation field workers and 45 community volunteers trained NFI ■ Total number of beneficiaries : 5,000 HHs ■ 9,921 blankets, 7,000 plastic sheet; 7,500 Jerry cans; 46,000 bars of soap, 7,053 bucket; 3,000 kitchen set; 6,235 sleeping mat; 10,000 mosquito net; 20,700 sanitary kit; 13,800 under wear and 600 tent were purchased and distributed

Note: The disaggregated data does not add up to the total as inputs from IPs are incomplete

3.2.7 Common Services

United Nations Department for Safety and Security (UNDSS) Humanitarian access in some areas remains access through regular reporting on the security compromised during the year due to prevailing security situation, timely response to security incidents, challenges from inter-communal conflicts, cross border contingency planning and liaison / coordination incursions and spillover effects of crisis from arrangements with local authorities in affected and at- neighboring countries, particularly from Somalia and risk regions of Benishangul-Gumuz, Oromia, Gambella Sudan. Humanitarian operations have been affected and Somali. and safety and security of staff challenged.

The HRF in 2012 allocated US$ 291,241 to UNDSS to United Nations Humanitarian Air Service (UNHAS) enhance delivery of security and safety services for UN During the year, UNHAS, operated by WFP, expanded / INGO operations. The project improved humanitarian its flight operations to Gambella and Benishangul

20 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

Gumuz (Assosa) regions due to the increased Integrating Gender Standards in Humanitarian humanitarian operations, following refugee influxes Action from South Sudan. Road travel was risky in most areas During the year, the HRF allocated US$ 318,377 of Ethiopia and air travel was the only safe mode of towards an initiative by Oxfam GB on gender travel for humanitarian workers to reach the affected mainstreaming in humanitarian response through populations. In absence of reliable/safe air service enhancement of capacities of humanitarian actors. The providers in the area, UNHAS’ services remained project established common tools and standards of crucial for implementation of humanitarian activities in gender in emergencies. It also intended to build the region. Donors including funding from the HRF, accountability of humanitarian organizations to USAID, ECHO, and Belgium provided financial mainstream gender in emergency programmes as well support for the operations in 2012. HRF granted US$ as internal policies and procedures. Furthermore, the 1,998,538 to sustain the transportation service for the project targeted humanitarian organizations and their humanitarian community. UNHAS has been implementing partners operating in Amhara, Oromia, operational in Ethiopia since November 2007. Somali and SNNP Regions.

Implementing Number of projects Budget in US$ Geographic Area agencies

3 UNHAS – 1,998,538 UNHAS, UNDSS Amhara, Oromia, SNNP, UNDSS- 291,241 and Oxfam GB Somali, Benishangul, and Oxfam GB – 318,378 Gambella Regions Outputs

UNHAS ■ 37 agencies benefitted from UNHAS flight ■ 765 passengers/month and 2700kg/month of cargo transported ■ Nine destinations served (Addis Ababa, Dire Dawa, Jijiga, Warder, Kebridehar, Gode, Dollo Ado, Gambella and Assosa)

UNDSS ■ Total number of beneficiaries : all UN/NGOs operating in project areas ■ 89 security incidents involving UN and NGO staff members were attended; 89 field missions were conducted; 21 security related training activities conducted & 408 UN and INGO staff members participated ■ Almost 10,000 security clearance requests processed; movement of 56,817 UN vehicles (field missions) tracked; five office and 122 residential security surveys were conducted ■ 416 weekly security reports published; 330 Area Security Management Team meetings held; 143 radio sets for 10 Area Focal Persons installed

Oxfam GB ■ Total number of Beneficiaries : humanitarian organizations and their implementing partners operating in Amhara, Oromia, Somali and SNNP Regions ■ KAP/baseline assessment conducted on the capacity of 15 local humanitarian organizations ■ Research conducted in Somali Region on the impact of emergencies on boys and girls in camp and pastoral settings ■ Gender policy and mainstreaming guideline developed for the selected local NGOs ■ Training of Trainers offered to the representatives of the humanitarian organizations ■ Gender in emergencies assessment checklists contextualized and developed ■ Gender in emergencies training manual and induction pack developed ■ Website to foster sharing of gender in emergencies training manual, tools and checklists under finalization

Note: The disaggregated data does not add up to the total as inputs from IPs are incomplete

21 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

4. Summary and analysis of achievements

4.1) HRF’s Effort in Resilience Building

Linking emergency with long term development – Through an integrated food security and WASH Oxfam GB Study approach, Oxfam GB relatively reduced negative coping strategies through protection of livelihood The HRF is primarily a humanitarian response assets. The project aimed to minimize costly and mechanism to support humanitarian response in delayed emergency response approaches, such as water situations of acute need. However, depending on the trucking, and to provide a foundation on which longer- resource availability and the humanitarian situation, term development projects could be built upon. funding decisions are made with an effort to balance the short and long term potential impact of Seed /Tuber Response in SNNPR programmes. The HRF supported consortium (group of implementing partners) applications for seed/tuber The HRF initiated and supported ($697,780) a study response which targeted poor smallholder farmers (through Oxfam GB) in Siti zone (formerly Shinile affected by repeated shocks in the region. Food 1 zone) , Somali Region to understand the root causes of security remained a chronic problem in many areas of the continued emergency needs in the zone. Siti zone SNNPR, the result of small farm size which, in turn, is is repeatedly coded as ‘priority one’ for emergency associated with high population density and growth response, despite the presence of large resources rates. Adding to these vulnerabilities, the 2011 and (development and emergency) both from the 2012 belg rains either failed or were well below Government and humanitarian donors. The study normal, which contributed to delayed planting and poor ‘Linking Emergency with Longer-Term Development production of crops. The pushback of the farming in Siti Zone of Somali Region (Oxfam, July 2012)’ calendar and early cessation of rains resulted in showed that the divide between “emergency” and immature crops and a poor quality in grain production. “development” interventions is blurred and artificial. Furthermore, emergency responses have negatively Smallholder farmers identified the seed / tuber affected the traditional coping mechanisms and failed provision as a priority, following the removal of to address the root causes of the problems. Women also previous credit arrangements. The project provided felt that gender issues needed to be addressed prioritized targeting for families with children in systematically through women and youth nutrition treatment centers (OTPs and SCs), and linked empowerment, providing marketable skills and the emergency response with recovery. It also tried to livelihoods, creating awareness on youth and women ensure improved availability of quality seed through discrimination and encouraging participation in distribution and voucher schemes and supported development activities as well as educating girls to smallholder farmers to produce better. The project fight for change. assisted 82,291 households (658,328 people) in 22 woredas of SNNPR. DRR in Siti (Shinile zone), Somali Region The HRF co-financed a ‘community managed drought Flood Mitigation in Eastern Amhara Region risk preparedness and response (DRR)’ in Siti zone, The HRF supported a joint flood mitigation project in Somali Region with the European Commission (EC); Eastern Amhara Region. The project protected the lives based on the findings of the above mentioned study. and livelihoods of 27,120 flood prone households in The activities focused on strengthening early warning the five woredas of eastern Amhara Region through systems, working with communities and regional building physical and biological flood mitigation governments to prepare and implement drought risk measures on ten rivers and tributaries. The joint project management plans, strengthening learning on drought constructed earthen dykes and placed gabion structures risk management at national and regional levels, as along river embankments and removed silt from well as rehabilitating strategic water sources to riverbeds and riversides. The project followed the facilitate and contribute to sustainable project activity. success of the 2009 HRF funded Joint Emergency Flood Mitigation project in Amhara Region that had a high impact in reducing flood damage arising from Lake Tana through the strengthening of river embankments and de-silting of rivers.

1 The Somali Regional authority changed the names of six zones out of the nine in 2012.

22 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

4.2) Strategic Engagement with Clusters 4.3) HRF hired new auditors

Water Trucking Guideline Developed In October 2012, Tesfaye Teferi & Co. Chartered The independent water trucking evaluation, funded by Certified Accountants were hired to conduct external the HRF and finalized in January 2012, reinforced the audits and closures of project accounts. Since their importance of developing a guideline that standardized appointment, the auditors audited and closed 26 emergency water trucking operations. The evaluation backlogged projects from 2011. With the newly also included lessons learnt and best practices based on procured auditors and the previously contracted firm, realities on the ground. UNICEF endorsed the feedback the HRF was able to close out 56 projects during the and revised the water trucking guideline. The guideline year. The HRF also made vigorous efforts to follow up and associated documents included check lists and a on projects due to close with implementing partners job card system (a monitoring tool) to provide through timely collection of final reports and a standards and accountability to the operation. The HRF quickened review process. Review Board commissioned the evaluation following a large expenditure of resources on water trucking 4.4 The HRF Stakeholder Survey operations due to the La Niňa induced drought conditions in the south and south eastern rangelands. As part of the annual performance survey, the HRF Water trucking, though critical during acute crises, is conducted stakeholders’ survey to learn about partners’ the least favored response by stakeholders due to the understanding, views and thoughts about the Fund. The lack of sustainability and accountability in this type of HRF used the results to inform the Fund’s strategies intervention. and directions for the year ahead. It also used the feedback to improve its efficiency and effectiveness as The HRF and WASH Joint Action Plan (JAP) well as to address areas of weaknesses identified by the Expanding the initiative from the evaluation, the stakeholders. WASH sector/cluster developed a strategy - Joint Action Plan (JAP) for WASH operations in Afar and This year the HRF received relatively reduced input Somali Regions. The JAP is a proposal developed to from the survey with only 32 responses from create linkage and coordination between emergency stakeholders: 20 from INGOs (62.5 per cent); 8 from and development activities, under the leadership of the UN agencies (25 per cent), 2 from donors (6.3 per Regional Water Bureaus. Among others, the JAP plans cent); 1 from National NGO (3 per cent) and 1 to reduce water trucking needs by 50 per cent in representing a cluster (3 per cent). Somali and Afar Regions by June 2013. Continuing its strategic engagement with the WASH cluster / sector, The below summary highlights the main findings from the HRF ensured that all HRF supported WASH the online survey: projects in Afar and Somali Regions are aligned with the JAP. The HRF as part of UN OCHA The majority of the respondents expressed that the Nutrition Cluster Strategy work of the HRF and its role in assisting OCHA’s The HRF, informed by the results of monitoring advocacy work was “satisfactory”. Except three missions, contributed to the change in the policy of the percent, almost all respondents replied positively to the start of emergency nutrition projects in chronic question of the HRF’s impact in improving nutrition affected areas, particularly SNNPR. The coordination among humanitarian agencies. indicator used for soliciting response was increased admissions into treatment centers (SC and OTP). The The HRF as part of the Humanitarian Reform monitoring findings, however, noted that admissions Process figures are late indicators and should be replaced by About 90 per cent of the respondents were of the proxy and early indicators (rainfall, production data opinion that the HRF has provided predictable etc). Additionally, the six month duration cap for all humanitarian financing, while nine per cent replied HRF projects including nutrition was revisited “insufficiently”, noting that the Fund’s contribution considering observations of response interruption was modest. In regards to the HRF’s role in during peak seasons. strengthening the cluster mechanism, 94 per cent of the respondents responded favorably, while 6 per cent felt The Nutrition Cluster and the Review Board supported that it was insufficient in strengthening the cluster the need to mobilize earlier responses to ensure more mechanism. One respondent supported this view: “As effective and cost efficient interventions. It was also projects are approved by the clusters there is agreed to consider emergency nutrition intervention improvement of cluster partnership.” durations on a case-by-case basis against context analysis.

23 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

In addition, 84 per cent of the respondents felt that the other hand, there were few respondents who felt that work of the HRF has strengthened the leadership role this was not the role of HRF, as the intent of the Fund of the HC, while 13 per cent replied “do not know”. was for emergency response to critical humanitarian needs and that emergency response projects of six Furthermore, majority of the respondents (81 per cent) months’ duration will not build resilience. replied that the HRF demonstrated effective commitment to engaging and promoting good Monitoring and Evaluation partnership. Nearly half of all the respondents Some 69 per cent of the respondents felt that HRF responded “mostly” and 31 per cent “completely”. supported projects are adequately monitored. In regards to ‘peer-to-peer’ monitoring, over 50 per cent Governance of the HRF of the respondents were engaged in this practice. A On the question of maintaining the right balance comment on the relevance of this practice included “it between speed and quality control, the majority of was a good experience for agency/programme as we respondents (75 per cent) replied favorably, while 19 were able to replicate some best practices into our per cent said “insufficiently” and 6 per cent “do not projects”. know”. More than 50 per cent of the respondents felt that HRF On transparency of the application review process, 90 field based monitoring has enabled lessons learned. per cent felt that the process is clear and transparent. Proposed ideas for improvement of HRF monitoring One respondent commented: “Absolutely, the review included improved ‘timeliness’, strengthened peer starts in the cluster and then to Board [Review]. The monitoring system and regularization of the approach. projects are discussed openly and decisions are based Inclusion of components of input and output on consensus. Good system”. Out of the six per cent monitoring, process monitoring, impact monitoring and that responded otherwise, three per cent replied context monitoring have also been recommended. “insufficiently” and the remaining three per cent “do not know”. HRF Strengths, Weakness and areas for improvement On the question of the composition of the HRF Review Overall, “predictability”, “transparency”, “availability Board: 88 per cent of the respondents are satisfied with of fund” and “rapid funding mechanism” were cited as the current Board composition. strengths of the HRF, along with the availability of a coordination and prioritization forum and the robust The HRF and Effectiveness involvement of clusters in the review of project Some 28 per cent of the respondents were of the proposals. opinion that the HRF processing of project agreements and finalization during the year has improved, 31 per Some of the issues stated to be areas of weakness cent felt that it remained the same, while 13 per cent include the Global ERF Guidelines, specifically on felt that it has deteriorated. finance and administration issues, limited funding for resilience and delays in auditing, monitoring and In regards to the Contingency Fund, 88 per cent of the reporting. respondents were of the opinion that it needs to be reinstated. One respondent supported this by stating Areas of improvements included increased allowable “Important as startup money for emergencies, as overhead/administration costs, allowance on the NGO/HRF process will still take a few weeks for backdating of MOUs, timely monitoring of HRF finalization. Either reinstate the contingency fund or projects, immediate revision of the Global ERF accept to cover expenses retroactively”. Guidelines, and increased funding for livelihood interventions. On the question of achieving a balance between responding to immediate needs and building Overall, the survey results reflected the stakeholders’ resilience/aiding recovery, half of the respondents felt opinion on the effectiveness of the HRF Ethiopia: that the HRF achieved the balance, while 28 per cent 46.88 per cent “good”, 40.63 per cent “very good” and expressed that the balance was insufficient. On the 12.5 per cent “excellent”.

24 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

5. Project Monitoring During the 2012 reporting year, the HRF monitored 49 projects (79 per cent of funded projects) through on- site / field visits.

Description Quantity

Total number of projects 66

On-site monitored 49

Not Reached 13 market conditions and situation analysis) to initiate Unsuitable for on-site 4 responses.

monitoring HRF monitoring also identified delays in the implementation of the Targeted Supplementary Feeding Programmes (TSFP) that compounded timely The HRF’s monitoring during the year identified key emergency nutrition interventions. The Multi-Agency issues to improve the timeliness of emergency Nutrition Task Force (MANTF) is exploring alternative interventions. One major issue focused on delays in ways of implementing emergency nutrition startup of nutrition responses in particular due to the interventions with a component that address moderate widespread practice of waiting for late indicators malnutrition. (admissions into treatment centers) to justify interventions. Partners often wait for data indicating Furthermore, the HRF’s real-time monitoring increase in outpatient and inpatient admissions to information on seed/tuber consortium projects mobilize resources. improved the quality of program implementation. Challenges of beneficiary targeting and quality of Cognizant of the significance of the finding, the seeds/tuber were identified and addressed prior to nutrition cluster is working with implementing partners project completion. and the HRF to use proxy indicators (rainfall data,

Key monitoring findings include:

Issue being Questions Common challenges Common explanations Other remarks monitored identified

Timeliness How timely are Partners with capacity Delays in getting HRF funded to provide upfront agreement with regional interventions? financing are able to governments. avoid start-up delays. Progress towards What progress in In spite of startup Plethora of issues Partners make use the delivery of achieving outputs delays outputs are of no cost outputs of action plan? ultimately realized extension systems Quality of output To what extent do Delay in progress Access related challenges outputs and compromises quality due to poor security and outcomes adhere to infrastructure and supply quality standards shortfall affect quality

25 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

Quality of How well are the Startup workshops are Woreda officials are coordination projects and used to clarify generally supportive of partners’ actions responsibilities. Joint partners work. coordinated monitoring with locally? government also facilitates coordination. Relevance Is the intervention Interventions are Vigilance in relevant to the largely designed to understanding emerging humanitarian needs respond to humanitarian humanitarian needs, as in the area? needs well as participation in coordination forums are useful in maintaining relevance of interventions Participation What is the level of It is difficult to ensure Regardless of partners community satisfactory level of commitment to involvement? participation participatory processes, time pressure and other competing priorities do not permit engagement to the level desired Quality of Who does the Local government does Strong government Participatory beneficiary selection? What are the selection involvement in beneficiary targeting the criteria used? humanitarian response selection needs to be promoted to avoid unjustified exclusions. The effectiveness/ Is the project Largely effective. Multi-faceted challenges This challenge was appropriateness of effective in its However, at times including operational clearly observed in the intervention in progress towards delays in project start limitations inhibit Water Trucking addressing needs accomplishing its up challenge the delivery of desired interventions stated objective realization of stated outcomes at times. objective/s The involvement Are local NGOs Some of the HRF HRF does not provide HRF is finalizing of local NGOs taking part in partners are not direct direct funding to local preparations to projects run by implementers, they NGOs open direct access partners? serve as a bridge to local NGOs between the HRF and the local implementing NGOs Gender Are the particular Beyond commitment SADD reporting mainstreaming needs of men and during the application continues to be women, boys and process, quality in the challenging to collate. girls considered in realization of gender implementation? mainstreaming is questionable.

Looking ahead, the HRF plans to expand the ‘peer to studies (similar like the water trucking evaluation) to peer’ monitoring mechanism through improved inform strategies. engagement with implementing partners and involvement of clusters, technical task forces, Review The HRF will also strengthen its relationship with the Board members and donors. clusters to institutionalize newly emerging changes in policy direction. The HRF will also explore innovative ways of conducting sector/intervention specific evaluations/

26 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

Learning the Hard Way:

Compared to achievements, the HRF gives serious consideration to negative findings of monitoring results as these provide opportunities for real learning, including better guidance on deployment of resources. For example, some components of the Flood Mitigation work in Amhara Region jointly implemented by FAO and World Vision – construction of gabions - presented an undesirable outcome of providing open areas that were used for defecation and became latrine sites due to the lack of awareness in the communities. As best practices are absorbed and shared among the humanitarian community for lessons or replication, negative findings are also communicated for improvement of future implementation.

6. Gender Consideration During the year, the HRF worked to align its activities In 2012, the HRF supported its first code ‘3’ project with national level initiatives led by the Government (providing $318,378) that is principally designed to (Disaster Risk Management and Food Security Sector). improve gender equality. The project was an HRF The federal Working Group on Mainstreaming Gender initiative and targeted humanitarian organizations and in Disaster Risk Management (WGMG-DRM) was their implementing partners operating in Amhara, formally inaugurated on 13 March. Among other Oromia, Somali, and SNNP regions. It increased the priorities, the WGMG-DRM plans to coordinate its understanding and commitments of humanitarian activities with the IASC Gender Marker and similar organizations to gender integration, including relevant other initiatives. government offices, and that all emergency responses and actions should be tailored to the needs of the The HRF included UN Women, as a non-voting different groups. A minimum of 20 organizations member in the Review Board, to further enhance directly benefited from the project. The major focus gender sensitive appraisal of projects. The focal areas included strengthening the capacities of person initiated proper translation of commitments into humanitarian international and local NGOs, practice, and ensured the attribution of accountability government partners and stakeholders, on gender to an individual within the organization to implement mainstreaming. It also adapted international tools to the activities outlined in projects. Ethiopian context and prepared an induction package for incoming humanitarian staff. Under this project, Meanwhile, compliance on the application of the the Gender in Humanitarian Action Working Group Gender Marker was 92 per cent over the year. The has been established as the Steering Committee to remaining 8 per cent was linked to common service monitor this progress. projects, including procurement and logistics, which limited full compliance on Gender Marker application.

Gender Code2 No. of Projects %

Code 0 - There are no signs that gender 0 0% issues were considered in project design. There is risk that the project will unintentionally nurture existing gender inequalities or deepen them.

Code 1 - The project is designed to 7 11% contribute in some limited way to gender equality. The design could be stronger and advance gender equality more. a) The project needs assessment includes a gender

2 The coding is done as per the HRF Gender Maker -Self Assessment tool as the new was introduced to implementing partners after October 2012.

27 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012 analysis that is not meaningfully reflected in activities and outcomes OR b) At least one activity and outcome aim to advance gender equality but this is not supported by the needs assessment.

Code 2 (Code 2a) ‐ It is designed to 53 80% contribute significantly to gender equality. The different needs of women/girls and men/boys have been analyzed and integrated well in the activities and outcomes.

Code – 3 (Code 2b) - The principal 1 2% purpose of the project is to advance gender equality. The entire project either: a) assists women or men, girls or boys who suffer from discrimination creating a more level playing field OR b) focuses all activities on building gender specific services or more equal relations between women and men.

N/A 5 8% N/A - mostly for countrywide interventions by UNICEF (RUTF), WFP, UNHAS, UNHCR, GOAL (seed emergency for E/W Harerghe)

28 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

7. Conclusion and Way Forward Transformative Agenda3 and ERF/HRF The HRF at the country level will explore modalities to funding mechanism, though not the largest donor in strategically place itself within the context of the Ethiopia, and its importance increased in 2011. It adds Transformative Agenda in close consultation with value in terms of absolute availability of resources, FCS. The Global ERF Evaluation mission noted that filling gaps in time and in specific underfunded sectors. particular attention needs to be given in areas where The finding also indicated that CERF responds in a OCHA demonstrates progress made through the timely manner, meeting PAF performance benchmarks. Transformative Agenda, which also impacts OCHA’s The recommendations set forth by the review require role as both a coordinator and source of funds. follow up (HC and OCHA) for future improved performance. Global ERF Guidelines The Global ERF Guidelines were signed into effect on Global ERF Evaluation 9 October 2012. Although project preparation and Ethiopia, selected as one of the Evaluation’s country agreement processing time slowed while adjusting to case studies, hosted the Global Evaluation of the the new process, implementation of activities Emergency Response Funds between 5 and 13 October continued. The HRF convened a half day 2012. The Evaluation was an independent assessment familiarization workshop (30 October 2012) with on the contribution of ERFs to the humanitarian implementing partners to create common learning and community’s ability to address critical unforeseen provide clarity on areas of change. A high level humanitarian needs in a timely and effective manner. mission from OCHA HQ (FCS in NY and ASB in It also examined the contribution of ERFs to Geneva) visited Ethiopia in April 2012 to discuss strengthening the leadership of the HCs, the concerns and the way forward with stakeholders prior coordination role of the cluster system, and building to the implementation of the Guidelines. The partnerships (in particular with national and local Guidelines are scheduled for revision in July 2013. NGOs). The case study report for Ethiopia provided a positive feedback on the overall management of the NNGO Direct Access to HRF Fund. Recommendations included ensuring direct To facilitate direct access by national NGOs to HRF access of the HRF to NNGOs; allocating certain funds, the HC chaired a familiarization workshop on percentage of funding to DRR/resilience building 24 January 2012. The HRF subsequently developed interventions; apportioning a certain percentage of the draft eligibility criteria including Registration and fund for innovative evaluation; and proactive Licensing, Governance, Organizational structure and engagement with clusters on monitoring (peer to peer). Infrastructure, Finance and Budgeting requirements, for direct access to the Fund. The HC and the HRF Central Supplementary Food Pipeline4 Advisory Board reviewed and endorsed the draft The management and timely utilization of the CSB and eligibility criteria. The draft document is currently Oil resources from the central procurement stock with OCHA HQ for review to ensure alignment with (managed by WFP) prior to the ‘Best Before Days’ global ERF standards. remained challenging due to a policy change in the WFP/GoE TSF programme. Under the new TSFP Independent Review of the Value Added of CERF strategy, WFP is responsible for providing resources in Ethiopia 2012 for all ‘priority one woredas’, while other donors As part of the CERF Performance and Accountability provide funds for ‘priority two’ and’ priority three’ Framework (PAF), Ethiopia hosted an independent woredas. Additionally, WFP procured a large amount country-level review (from 5-17 May 2012) of the of CSB resources that were over and above the added value of CERF in the country. It forms part of requirement. the regional review of the added value of CERF in responding to the Horn of Africa crisis in 2011, also The HRF pipeline was affected as the changes of covering Djibouti, Kenya and Somalia. strategy were introduced after the stock was procured. These major changes significantly reduced the The review concluded that CERF plays an important resources required from the HRF central procurement, role in Ethiopia, particularly in close coordination with forcing allocation of large resources to an International funding from the HRF. CERF was identified as a major NGO (GOAL) that had sub-granting arrangement for

4 The HRF and WFP have trust fund arrangement in which WFP 3 The IASC Transformative Agenda is the set of actions within manages a pipeline of centralized procurement of CSB (Corn-Soya which OCHA and the humanitarian system is collectively working to Blend) and Oil. The approach has proved successful in providing a improve leadership, coordination and accountability of humanitarian coordinated approach to the market and provides predictable supply response. of resources.

29 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

nutrition response with USAID’s Office of Disaster Monitoring & Reporting (M&R) Framework Assistance (OFDA). The HRF needs to align its In 2013, the HRF will implement the newly developed procurement plan with WFP’s strategy to ensure Monitoring & Reporting (M&R) framework, which appropriate utilization of resources in the year ahead. includes the development of a periodic monitoring plan, implementation, and review process. The Accountability Log-frame Framework, developed by FCS, will be further refined The HRF and DFID will jointly foresee the in consultation with other CBPF. The draft Framework development of the Business Case and Log frame for is appreciated for including planning framework the HRF. The adoption of the DFID log frame will against periodic reviews. Whilst recognizing HRF further strengthen OCHA’s partnership with this lead monitoring coverage among the “highest world-wide”, donor. DFID’s Business Case will be produced for the Global ERF Evaluation recommended the active DFID Ethiopia support to the HRF and OCHA engagement of the clusters/sectors in ‘peer to peer’ Ethiopia from FY 2013/14 to FY 2015/16. In monitoring for the system to work and expand. The collaboration with HRF stakeholders (OCHA, donors, HRF will work to explore ways to involve clusters to UN agencies and NGOs) and OCHA HQ (FCS and enhance organizational learning and experience ASB), a multi-stakeholder log frame for the HRF will sharing. be developed that could potentially inform a standardized accountability framework for all country- based pooled funds (CBPF).

30 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

Glossary/Acronyms ASB Administrative Services Brach – Geneva OCHA AWD Acute Watery Diarrhoea Belg Short rains from March to May (in highland and midland areas) CAHWS Community Animal Health Workers CCRDA Consortium of Christian Relief and Development Association CBPF Country-based pooled funds CERF Central Emergency Response Fund CMAM Community Management of Acute Malnutrition CSB Corn-Soya Blend, a blended food used in targeted supplementary feeding Deyr Short rains from October to December (in Somali Region) DFID The Department for International Development , UK DRM Disaster Risk Management DRMFSS Disaster Risk Management and Food Security Sector DRR Disaster Risk Reduction EFSL Emergency Food Security and livelihoods EHCT Ethiopian Humanitarian Country Team ENCU Emergency Nutrition Coordination Unit EPI Expanded Programme on Immunization ERFs Emergency Response Funds – New York OCHA FCS - OCHA Funding Coordination Section FY Fiscal Year GM Gender Marker Gu Main rains from March to June (in Somali Region) HC Humanitarian Coordinator HH Household HINGO Humanitarian International Non-Governmental Organization HRD Humanitarian Requirements Document HRF Humanitarian Response Fund IASC Inter-Agency Standing Committee IDP Internally Displaced Person INGO International Non-Governmental Organizations JAP Joint Action Plan MAM Moderate Acute Malnutrition MANTF Multi-agency Nutrition Task Force Meher Long and heavy rains from June to September (in highland and midland areas) MHNTs Mobile Health and Nutrition Teams MOU Memorandum of Understanding MT Metric Tons NFI Non –food items NGO Non-Governmental Organization OCHA Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (UN) OFDA Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance OTP Outpatient Therapeutic Programme PLW Pregnant & Lactating Women Region The highest non-federal administrative structure, embracing zones and woredas RHB Regional Health Bureau RTE Real-Time Evaluation RUTF Ready-to-Use Therapeutic Food SAM Severe Acute Malnutrition Sapie Short rainy season between November and December in SNNPR SC Stabilization Center SNNPR Southern Nations, Nationalities and People’s Region TFP Therapeutic Feeding Programme TSFP Targeted supplementary feeding programme UN United Nations WASH Water, Sanitation and Hygiene

31 | Page

Humanitarian Response Fund – Ethiopia Annual Report 2012

WGMG-DRM Working Group on Mainstreaming Gender in Disaster Risk Management Woreda Administrative/geographic unit equivalent to district Zone Administrative unit consisting of several woredas

32 | Page

Annexes:

Annex I: HRF Review Process Diagram

Proposal Review and Fund Disbursement Process/Flow

Proposal Submitted (III) Proposal sent back for modification Review by OCHA/HRF: identified priorities, budget review according to HRF guidelines, (II) Does Not Meet cost effectiveness Criteria (I) Meets Criteria Review by cluster/ taskforce : technical quality, methodology, regional priority, coordination Meets Criteria Review by HRF Board: national priority, cost effectiveness, coordination Meets Criteria Recommendation of the RB sent to HC for Proposal Rejected approval MOU Sent to Agency

Agency completes MOU

Completed MOU along with signed RB minutes sent to Geneva for clearance

Geneva clears completed MOU

Agency signs on cleared MOU

HC signs MOU and endorsement letter

MOU, HC endorsement letter and disbursement request letter sent to Geneva for fund transfer

Funds Transferred to the Agency

33 | Page

Annex II: List of HRF Review Board Members in 2012

International NGOs

CONCERN

International Medical Corps

Save the Children International

Government

DRMFSS – Disaster Risk Management and Food Security Sector, Ministry of Agriculture

UN agencies

FAO

UNDP

UNHCR

UNICEF

WFP

WHO

Others

CCRDA (Consortium of Christian Relief and Development Association)

Ethiopian Red Cross

IOM

USAID (Observer)

34 | Page

Annex III: 2012 Certified Financial Statement

35 | Page

Annex IV: HRF Staff Contacts

Name Title Tel Email

Mike McDonagh Head of Office 0115 444248 [email protected]

Tim Mander Program Manager 0115 545336 [email protected]

Fekadu Tafa Programme Officer 0115 444052 [email protected]

Maidot Mehereka Programme Officer ‐ Consultant 0115 444424 [email protected]

Meaza Duga Finance Associate 0115 444320 [email protected]

Senait Arefaine Programme Officer 0115 444186 [email protected]

Tigist Alemu Programme Officer 0115 444374 [email protected]

Tersit Belete Programme Associate 0115 444469 [email protected]

36 | Page

Annex V – 2012 HRF Funded Project Details

Code Agency Sector Duration Location Approved Amount

HRF/ETH/0313/321 WFP Nutrition 12 months (30 Jan – 31 Dec. 12) Country wide 4,074,243 (RUTF)

HRF/ETH/O313/327 UNHCR Refugee (NFI) 6 months ( 30 Dec 2011 - 30 June Benishangul Gumuz 639,712 12)

HRF/ETH/O313/329 VSF G Livestock 9 months (23 Jan - 23 October 12) Afar region, Abala and Afdera woredas 606,347 NCE 31 Dec 2012

HRF/ETH/O313/330 VSF S Livestock 9 months (23 Jan - 23 Oct 2012) NCE Somali region, Hargelle and Gode woredas 578,659 23 Jan 2013

HRF/ETH/O313/332 Mercy Corps Nutrition 6 months (27 Jan - 31 Jul 12) Somali region, Afder Zone, Guradamole and Qersa 197,944 Dula Districts

HRF/ETH/O313/333 Oxfam GB EFSL 2 months (20 Feb. - 20 Apr 12) Oromia region, Borena Zone, Miyo, Dire, Dillo and 601,308 Dhas Woredas

HRF/ETH/O313/334 World Vision Refugee 6 months (25 Feb - 31 Aug 12) NCE Benishangul-Gumuz Region, Assosa, Tongo 1,121,510 (WASH) 31 Dec 2012 Refugee Camp

HRF/ETH/O313/335 IMC Refugee 10 months ( 14 March 2012 - 15 Jan Somali region, Dolo Ado Woreda, Boqolmayo Camp 694,581 (WASH) 2013) NCE 28 Feb 2013

HRF/ETH/O313/336 GOAL Refugee 6 months (01 March - 15 Sep 2012) Somali region, Dollo Ado, Buramino refugee Camp 486,000 (Nutrition)

37 | Page

HRF/ETH/O313/337 Oxfam GB Displaced 2 months (25 Feb - 20 April 2012) Oromiya region, Borena zone, Moyale woreda; 265,195 people (NFI) Somali region, Liben zone, Moyale woreda

HRF/ETH/O313/338 IOM Displaced 3 months (08 March - 15 June 2012) Oromia region, Borena zone, Moyale woreda; 232,618 people (NFI) Somali region, Liben zone, Moyale woreda

HRF/ETH/O313/339 Oxfam GB WASH 1.5 months (06 March - 15 May 2012) Somali region, Shinile Zone 542,259 NCE 15 July 2012

HRF/ETH/O313/340 FAO EFSL 6 months (09 March - 15 Sep 2012) Amhara region, Antsokia Gemza, Efratana Gidim, 700,000 Kewet, Habru and Kobo woredas

HRF/ETH/O313/341 World Vision EFSL 7 months ( 20 March - 15 Sep 2012) Amhara region, Antsokia Gemza, Efratana Gidim, 700,000 NCE 15 Nov 2012 Kewet, Habru and Kobo woredas

HRF/ETH/O313/342 ZOA EFSL,NFI 8 months (03 May - 15 Nov 2012) Somali region, Liben Zone, Hudet District 680,000 NCE 31 Dec 2012

HRF/ETH/O313/343 Oxfam GB Common 12 months ( 20 April 2012- 15 April Amhara, Oromia, Somali, and SNNPR 318,378 Service 2013) (Gender) HRF/ETH/O313/344 WHO Health 9 months (27 April - 31 Dec 2012) SNNPR, Kembata, Wolayta, Hadiya Zones, and 998,588 (Meningitis) NCE 30 April 2013 Halaba special woreda HRF/ETH/O313/345 Oxfam GB WASH 5 months (15 May - 15 Oct 2012) Oromia region, Borena Zone, Moyale Woreda; 699,907 NCE 15 Dec 2012 Somali Region, Liben Zone, Moyale Woreda

HRF/ETH/O313/347 COOPI WASH & NFI 5 months (25 May - 30 Sept 2012) Somali region, Liben Zone, Filtu and Dheka-Suftu 653,683 Woredas

HRF/ETH/O313/348 SC UK Nutrition 6 months (07 June - 10 Dec 2012) Somali region, Shinile Zone, Ayisha, Shinile and 356,176 NCE 31 Jan 2013 Hadigala Woredas HRF/ETH/O313/349 SC US Nutrition 6 months ( 07 June - 4 Dec 2012) SNNPR, Hadeya zone, Shashego woreda; Silte 365,870 NCE 4 March 2013 zone, Sankura woredas and Gurage zone, Mareko woredas HRF/ETH/O313/350 SC US Nutrition 6 months (07 June - 30 Nov 2012) Somali region, Moyale and Mubarek woredas 576,238 NCE 28 Feb 2013

38 | Page

HRF/ETH/O313/351 SC US Nutrition 6 months (07 June - 30 Nov 2012) SNNPR, Segene Zone, Konso, Derashe, Alle 432,579 NCE 28 Feb 2013 Woredas and Siltie Zone, Lanfuro Woreda

HRF/ETH/O313/352 CARE Nutrition 4.5 months (04 June - 10 Dec 2012) SNNPR, Meskan and Sodo Woredas 228,857 NCE 10 Feb 2013 HRF/ETH/O313/353 Plan Nutrition 6 months (29 June - 31 Dec 2012) SNNPR, Bona-Zuria, Bensa, Dara and Wonago 506,357 NCE 28 Feb 2013 districts

HRF/ETH/O313/354 Concern Nutrition 6 months (19 June - 31 Dec 2012) SNNPR , Wolayita Zone, Kindo Didaye, Damot Gale, 579,873 Dugna Fango, Kindo Koysha, and Damot Weyde Woredas HRF/ETH/O313/355 FAO Seed 6 months ( 22 June- 31 Dec 2012) SNNPR , Boreda, Gize Gofa, Daramalo, Ayda, 387,725 NCE 31 March 2013 Boreda, Dembe Gofa, Uba Debre Tsehay woredas

HRF/ETH/O313/356 CRS Seed 6 months ( 25 June - 31 Dec 2012) SNNPR , Damot Pulasa, Boloso Soro, Boloso 475,456 NCE 31 March 2013 Bombe, Kundo Didaye, Tamboro, Kadida Gamella woredas HRF/ETH/O313/357 FHE Seed 6 months (21 June - 31 Dec 2012) SNNPR , Shashego and Halaba woredas 500,414 NCE 31 March 2013

HRF/ETH/O313/358 GOAL Seed 7 months (20 June- 31 Jan 2013) SNNPR , Boricha, Hawassa Zuriya, Loka Abaya 525,621 NCE 30 April 2013 woredas

HRF/ETH/O313/359 World Vision Seed 6 months (25 June- 31 Dec 2012) SNNPR , Humbo, Mirab Abaya, East Badawacho, 404,931 NCE 31 March 2013 West Badawacho, Soro woredas

HRF/ETH/O313/360 Child Fund Nutrition 6 months (22 June - 31 Dec 2012) SNNPR, Gedeo zone, Dilla Zuriya woreda 150,000

HRF/ETH/O313/361 IMC Nutrition 6 months (22 June - 31 Dec 2012) SNNPR, Wolayta Zone, Boloso Sore, Boloso Bombe, 538,624 Damot Pulassa Districts

HRF/ETH/O313/362 SSA Livestock 6 months (25 June - 31 Dec 2012) Afar region, Zone 1, Elidaar and Kori Woredas 420,002

HRF/ETH/O313/363 VSF G Livestock 6 months (22 June - 31 Dec 2012) Afar region, Zone 2, Afdera and Berehale Woredas 456,110 NCE 28 Feb 2013

39 | Page

HRF/ETH/O313/364 Concern Nutrition 6 months (29 June - 31 Dec 2012) Amhara Region, North Gondar Zone, East Belesa 460,658 Woreda; South Wollo Zone, Dessie Zuria and Delanta Woredas; and North Wollo Zone, Bugna Woreda

HRF/ETH/O313/365 IMC Nutrition 6 months (09 July - 15 Jan 2013) Oromia Region, West Arsi Zone, Shalla, Dodola, 495,244

Adaba Districts HRF/ETH/O313/366 UNICEF Nutrition 12 months (05 July 2012 - 30 June Country Wide 4,023,200 (RUTF) 2013) HRF/ETH/O313/367 Plan Nutrition 6 months (14 Aug - 15 Feb 2013) Amhara region, Lasta, Dehana and Gazgibla districts 403,283 International NCE 16 April 2013 HRF/ETH/O313/368 Concern Seed 6 months (02 July 2012 - 15 January Amhara region, North and South Wollo zones, 291,672 2013) Woredas of Gubalafto, Mekdela, Mehal Saint, Legambo and Tenta HRF/ETH/O313/369 IOM NFI 3 months ( 17 Jul - 15 October 2012) Somali region, Liben Zone, Mubarek Woreda and 654,174 NCE 15 Dec 2012 Moyale Woreda HRF/ETH/O313/370 SC UK Nutrition 6 months ( 17 July 2012 - 15 January Amhara region, North Wello Zone, Meket, and 307,887 2013) NCE 15 April 2013 Gubalafto Woredas

HRF/ETH/O313/371 FAO Seed 6 months (17 July 2012 -15 January SNNPR, Ofa, Damot Sore, Kemba, Boreda, Bonke 248,685 2013) NCE 15 April 2013 woredas

HRF/ETH/O313/372 CRS Seed 6 months (10 July 2012 - 15 Jan SNNPR, Kadida Gamela, Tambaro woredas 325,221 2013) NCE 15 April 2013 HRF/ETH/O313/373 FHE Seed 6 months (09 July 2012 -15 January SNNPR, Sorro woreda 185,153 2013) NCE 15 April 2013 HRF/ETH/O313/374 GOAL Seed 7 months (16 July 2012 - 20 January SNNPR, Boricha ,Dalle, Shebedino and Dilla Zuria 178,496 2013) NCE 20 April 2013 woredas HRF/ETH/O313/375 WVE Seed 6 months (11 July 2012 - 15 January SNNPR, Sorro, East Badawacho, Badawacho, 351,189 2013) NCE 15 April 2013 Humbo and Western Abaya woredas

HRF/ETH/O313/376 Concern Seed 6 months (11 July 2012 - 15 January SNNPR, Dungan Fango, Damot-Gale, Damot- 322,086 2013) NCE 15 April 2013, NCE 15 Woyde, Kindo Koysha, Kindo Didaye woredas July 2013 HRF/ETH/O313/377 Child Fund Seed 6 months (17 July 2012 - 20 January SNNPR, Wonago and sodo Zuria woredas 124,892 2013)

40 | Page

HRF/ETH/O313/378 IMC Seed 6 months (09 July 2012 - 15 January SNNPR, Boloso Sore, Boloso Bombe, and Damot 173,538 2013) Pulasa woredas HRF/ETH/O313/379 ACF Nutrition 6 months (27 July 2012 - 25 January SNNPR, Sidama zone, Aleta Chuko woredas 181,507 2013) NCE 25 March 2013 HRF/ETH/O313/380 Plan, KHI Nutrition 6 months (04 Sep 2012 - 15 March SNNPR, Halaba special woreda and Duna woreda, 277,536 2013) HRF/ETH/O313/381 UNDSS Common 9 months (26 Nov 2012 - 31 May Somali, Oromia and Benishangul-Gumuz Regions 291,241 Service (Safety 2013) and Security) HRF/ETH/O313/382 GOAL Seed 3.5 months (09 July- 31 October 12) Oromia region, East Hararghe Zone, Meta, Deder 680,257 and Midega Tola woredas and West Hararghe zone, GubaKoricha, Habro and Chiro, Doba and Boke woredas HRF/ETH/O313/383 IRC WASH 6 months (02 Aug 2012 -15 February SNNPR, Gurage Zone, Mareko Woreda, & Sidama 678,824 13) NCE 15 May 2013 Zone, Bensa and Chire Woredas

HRF/ETH/O313/384 SC UK Nutrition 6 months (24 Aug 2012 - 15 March Somali region, Jijiga Zone, Harshin Woreda and 333,270 13) NCE 30 April 2013 Shinile Zone, Meiso Woreda

HRF/ETH/O313/385 Merlin Health 6 months (25 Aug 2012 - 15 March Somali region, Korahe Zone, Shekosh, Kebridehar, 325,814 13) NCE 15 May 2013 and Mersin Woredas HRF/ETH/O313/386 SSA WASH 6 months (12 Sep 2012 - 31 Mar Afar region, Zone 1: Eli Daar & Kori Woredas; Zone 284,403 2013) 3: Gewane, Bure Mudaytu & Amibara Woredas HRF/ETH/O313/387 ADRA WASH, 6 months (04 Oct 2012 - 30 April 13) Somali region, Afder zone, Bare woreda and Gode 403,231 Livestock Zone , Kelafo woreda

HRF/ETH/O313/388 VSF S Livestock 6 months (26 December 2012 - 25 Somali region, Korahe zone, Kebri Dehar and 391,265 June 13) Shilabo districts HRF/ETH/O313/389 GOAL Livestock 2 Months ( 04 Oct. - 15 Dec. 2012) Oromia region, Borena zone: (Teltelle, Dugdadawa, 199,947 Dire, Arero, YabeloMiyo, Moyale, Dilo, M/Soda, Dhas, Abaya, Gelana and Blue Hora).

HRF/ETH/O313/390 Merlin Health 6 Months (24 Dec 2012 - 25 June 13) Somali region, Moyale woreda and Oromiya Region, 552,488 Moyale woreda HRF/ETH/O313/392 COOPI WASH 5 months ( 12 Dec 2012 - 20 May 13) Somali region, Liben Zone, Filtu and Dheka Suftu 349,177 Woredas

41 | Page

HRF/ETH/O313/393 UNHAS Common 6 months (17 Dec 2012 -30 April 13) Country wide 1,998,538 Service (Air Transport)

HRF/ETH/O313/394 GOAL Nutrition 4 months (15 Dec 2012 -17 April 13) Oromia, Amhara, and SNNP regions 335,000

HRF/ETH/O313/395 FHE Livestock, EFSL 6 months (26 Dec 2012 - 30 June 13) Amhara, North Wollo Zone, Wadla and Lasta 472,035 Woredas

GRAND TOTAL 37,995,676.02

42 | Page

Annex VI: Planned Vs. Achievements

Nutrition

WFP -321 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Famix/CSB Purchased Metric Tones 3927 4,434 Due to good price from FPF the purchased quantity is more than planned

Oil Purchased Number 445 628 Due to good price from FPF the purchased quantity is more than planned

MC-332 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries 6687 Number 2916 6687 Women 1504 1504 Girls 1854 1854 Men1465 1465 Boys 1864 1864 SAM children treated 559 Number 264 559 Girls 323 323 Boys216 216 SAM cases with complication treated Number 21 26 26 Girls 16 16 Boys 10 10 MAM children treated 3279 Number 2065 3279 Girls 1814 1814 43 | Page

Boys 1465 1465 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 451 3358 3358 RUTF/plumpy nut distributed MT 2.5 6.98 from HRF's Central Procurement facility MT 67.63 67.63 from other source (indicate source) MT 55 55 Oil distributed (indicate source) Lit 8148 8148 Mobile health clinics established 20 Number 13 20 Health Extension Workers trained 20 Number 20 20 GOAL-336 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 11,000 15,000 Note that MAM & SAM children beneficiaries counted in all three programs (BSFP, TSFP, OTP) are removed from the total reach. Additionally, since the refugees moved from the Pre-registration, to Transit, to Buramino, the figures under each indicator should not be summed to reach to the final project beneficiaries addressed – therefore, the highest figure is used as the final tally. SAM children treated Number 987 1,041 Girls 544 Boys 497 MAM children treated Number 4,665 3,870 Girls Number 1916 Targeting was not sex segregated as the project objective is to treat all malnourished children of refugees that come to the screening center. However, in order to analyze which sex is more vulnerable to malnourishment, sex

44 | Page

segregated results are being collected Boys Number 1954

Blanket Supplementary Feeding for Number 6.644 31,742 children Female 15,137 Male 16,605 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 1328 2,244 SC UK - 348 Total beneficiaries No of direct 6,029 8,098 beneficiaries Women 778 3,849 Girls 2573 2969 Boys 2678 3090 SAM children treated Number 344 1412 Girls 169 692 Boys 175 720 SAM cases with complication treated Number 34 93 Girls 16 46 Boys 18 47 MAM children treated Number 4907 4647 Girls 2404 2277 Boys 2503 2370 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 778 3,849 RUTF/plumpy nut distributed Metric Tones 4.3 18 Famix/CSB distributed Metric Tones 107 69 From both HRF & WFP from other source (indicate source) WFP 217.1 Oil distributed (indicate source) Litre 15,350 14,000 From both HRF & WFP Mobile health clinics established Number 21 21 Health Extension Workers trained Number 24 22

45 | Page

Male 10 9 Female 14 13 SC US - 349 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 9,629 6470 beneficiaries Women 1,481 950 Girls 3993 2705 Men 0 0 Boys 4155 2815 SAM children treated Number 2818 2142 Girls 1381 1092 Boys 1437 1050 SAM cases with complication treated Number 282 189 Girls 144 93 Boys 138 96 MAM children treated Number 5330 3378 Girls 2718 1655 Boys 2612 1723 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 1481 950 RUTF/plumpy nut distributed Metric Tones 35 27 Famix/CSB distributed Metric Tones 128 81 from HRF's Central Procurement facility from other source (indicate source) WFP 108 81 Oil distributed (indicate source) Litre 18390 11686 Mobile health clinics established Number 0 0 Health Extension Workers trained Number 150 121 Male 74 59

46 | Page

SC US - 350 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 9,324 3063 beneficiaries Women 2,684 956 Girls 3254 1032 Men 0 0 Boys 3386 1075 SAM children treated Number 1064 1159 Girls 521 568 Boys 543 591 SAM cases with complication treated Number 106 116 Girls 52 57 Boys 54 59 MAM children treated Number 5576 948 Girls 2732 465 Boys 2844 483 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 2684 956 RUTF/plumpy nut distributed Metric Tones 13.3 14.4 Famix/CSB distributed Metric Tones 155 36 from HRF's Central Procurement facility from other source (indicate source) WFP 330 36 Oil distributed (indicate source) Litre 22302 5141 Mobile health clinics established Number 10 10 Health Extension Workers trained Number 62 62 Male 30 30 Female 32 32 SC US-351 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment

47 | Page

Total beneficiaries No of direct 10,256 8,821 beneficiaries Women 1,901 1,426 Girls 4094 3624 Men 0 0 Boys 4261 3771 SAM children treated Number 3835 2987 Girls 1879 1464 Boys 1956 1523 SAM cases with complication treated Number 384 403 Girls 188 197 Boys 196 206 MAM children treated Number 4520 4408 Girls 2215 2160 Boys 2305 2248 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 1901 1426 RUTF/plumpy nut distributed Metric Tones 48 37 Famix/CSB distributed Metric Tones 120 109 from HRF's Central Procurement facility 51.3 from other source (indicate source) WFP 115.9 Oil distributed (indicate source) Litre 17337 15752 Mobile health clinics established Number 0 0 Health Extension Workers trained Number 200 175 Male 98 86 Female 102 89 CARE-352 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 11471 9754 beneficiaries

48 | Page

Women 2552 3100 Girls 4281 3799 Boys 4638 2855 SAM children treated Number 1240 675 Girls 595 379 Boys 645 296 SAM cases with complication treated Number 0 49 Girls 30 Boys 19 MAM children treated Number 7679 5930 Girls 3686 3390 Boys 3993 2540 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 2552 3100 RUTF/plumpy nut distributed Metric Tones 31 3.45 The project distributed a portion of the total requirement while the Famix/CSB distributed Metric Tones remaining transported by government from HRF's Central Procurement facility from other source (from WFP) 223.29 178.36 Oil distributed (indicate source) Number 32.87 26.25 Mobile health clinics established Number Health Extension Workers trained Number 135 149 No information was obtained on male Male 9 HEWs during planning Female 135 140 OTP/SC sites received NFIs (indicate 111 105 type) Plan-353 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 2,765.00 2,765.00 beneficiaries

49 | Page

Women number 2,765.00 2,765.00 Girls number 4,953.00 4,953.00 Female children's under aged under five Boys number 4,626.00 4,626.00 SAM children treated Number 7,978.00 7,978.00 SAM cases with complication treated Number 483.00 483.00 MAM children treated Number 4,778.00 4,778.00 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 2,765.00 2,247.00 RUTF/plumpy nut distributed carton 416.00 416.00 UNICEF/MoH Famix/CSB distributed Metric Tones 191.63 191.63 WFP Oil distributed (indicate source) Metric Tones 54.78 54.78 WFP Male Number 314.00 314.00 Including woreda health office Female Number 45.00 45.00 staffs OTP/SC sites received NFIs (indicate number 18,000.00 18,000.00 SC and OTP materials type) Concern- 354 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 14,249 10,136 beneficiaries Women 4,981 4,056 Girls 4,717 3,302 Boys 4,551 2,778 Girls 691 629 Boys 667 662 Girls 69 55 Boys 67 43 Girls 3,957 2618 Boys 3,817 2073 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 4,981 4056 RUTF/plumpy nut distributed Metric Tones 17.14

50 | Page

from HRF's Central Procurement facility Metric Tones 398.6 152.9 from other source (indicate source) - 55.8 208.7mt in total Irish Aid Oil distributed (indicate source) HRF central procurement Litre 63,673 21,685 Irish Aid " 13,500 35,185 in total Female 0 280 Other major deliverables (indicate type 72 53 30 male and and number) - Refresher training of 23 female Health Professionals Training of community volunteers 752 817 513 Male and 304 female Distribution of Jerry cans (#) 7500 6,825 Distribution of Water Guards/Aqua 180,000 60,000 Tabs (pieces) Child Fund - 360 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 3611 5005 beneficiaries Women No of direct 796 1105 beneficiaries Girls No of direct 1502 beneficiaries Boys No of direct 1313 beneficiaries SAM cases with complication treated Number 11 Girls Number 7 Boys Number 4 MAM children treated Number 1074 Girls Number 573 Boys Number 501 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 796 1105 RUTF/plumpy nut distributed Metric Tones 5.175 5.175 UNICEF

51 | Page

Famix/CSB distributed Metric Tones 119.88 119.88 WFP Oil distributed (indicate source) Metric Tones 19.18 19.18 WFP Health Extension Workers trained Number 48 OTP/SC sites received NFIs (indicate Number 31 31 Soap type) Other major deliverables (indicate type CTC drugs, Registration cards, IEC and number) materials, etc. IMC - 361 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 8656 5013 The Beneficiaries decreased due to beneficiaries SAM rate are Low and Late startup of TSFP, poor community mobilization Women 2066 Girls 1291 Men 0 Boys 1656 SAM children treated Number 1839 1294 The SAM rate was low compared to the previous rate Girls 619 Boys 675 MAM children treated Number 5565 1653 Late start up of TSFP, poor community mobilization contributed to low achievement of this target.

Girls 672 Boys 981 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 1252 2066 More than planned PLW were admitted in the program RUTF/plumpy nut distributed Metric Tones 30.7 1.87 Due to a shortage of RUTF at zone level, transported amount was significantly low

52 | Page

OTP/SC sites received NFIs (indicate Number 94 94 IMC provided for 84 OTP and 10 type) SC sites required materials and routine medication for targeted facilities based on their gap Number of HIV positive person treated Number 292 93 Due to stigma, the admission for in TSFP people with HIV in TSFP became low. Number of OTP discharged children Number 1655 184 Poor referral linkage contributed for treated in TSFP low achievement of OTP discharged children Number of new operational OTP site Number 19 19 19 new OTP sites established at established health posts Number of new stabilization centers Number 6 6 Six new SC sites established at established health centers. Number existing OTP and SCs sites Number 69 69 64 existing OTP sites and 4 SC supported were receiving technical, material and logistical supports

Number of existing and new sits used Number 74 74 22 existing and new 52 sites was for TSFP carried out for food distribution Zonal and woreda government officials Number 30 35 Six female and 29 male people participate in orientation workshops participated the orientation workshop Number of private health facility staff Number 51 38 All the available health oriented on case screening and referral professionals from private health institute trained. Number of Keble level community Number 73 73 Target was achieved. sensitization session conducted Number of health professionals receive Number 165 168 112 male and 56 female trained basic training on CMAM Joint monitoring conducted with zonal Number 4 2 Due to unavailability of zonal and woreda government supervisors officials, only two joint monitoring monthly for 4 months visits were conducted Number of beneficiaries and care Number 8656 >15000 Target was achieved as planned takers provided with health and nutrition education 53 | Page

Number of care takers of under two Number 15178 18623 Target was achieved as planned. years old children reached by complementary feeding demonstration Number of FDAs trained on health and Number 104 104 104 female FDAs trained as a part nutrition promotion of TSFP Number of FGDs conducted in three Number 6 12 FGDs conducted at the beginning woredas of the project Number of participant in IYCF TOT Number 20 24 Four was IMC SC and IYCF from MoH, Education and IMC staffs nurses. Number of demonstration done on Number 759 768 Target was achieved as planned complementary feeding at OTP sites

Number of school nutrition clubs Number 6 6 Target was achieved as planned established Number of school nutrition clubs Number 12 12 Target was achieved as planned sensitization conducted Number of sessions IYCF messages Number 50 100 50 sessions to Shalla districts from transmitted Shashemene FM and another 50 sessions to Dodola and Adaba districts from Adama were transmitted. OTP/ SCs and school nutrition clubs Number 100 100 Booklets and posters were provided with IEC materials provided Concern-364 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 12,992 15,127 beneficiaries Women 2,965 6,341 Girls 5245 5,044 Boys 4782 3,742 SAM children treated in OTP Number 705 1,218 Girls 369 652 Boys 336 566 54 | Page

SAM cases with complication treated Number 70 39 Girls 37 19 Boys 33 20 MAM children treated Number 9,252 7,529 Girls 4839 4,373 Boys 4413 3,156 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 2965 6,341 from HRF's Central Procurement facility 360.42 192.2 Irish Aid 122.3 WFP 86.95 401.4 Mt in total Oil distributed (indicate source) Litres 64,563 from HRF's Central Procurement facility 37,505 Irish Aid 6,456 WFP 14,275 58,236 lit in total Health Extension Workers trained Number 131 Female 0 131 Health Professionals trained Number 37 Male 0 11 Female 0 26 Distribution of soap Bars 25,368 12,042 Distribution of Water Guards Pieces 50,736 33,750 IMC-365 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 7515 9771 beneficiaries Women N/A 5077 Girls N/A 2639 Men N/A 0 Boys N/A 2055

55 | Page

SAM children treated Number 3188 1854 Due to the improved food security situation, malnutrition rate was reduced in most woreda of Wolayita zone. Girls 1003 Boys 851 MAM children treated Number 1185 2829 Girls 1640 Boys 1189 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 324 5077 RUTF/plumpy nut distributed Metric Tones 53.13 56.58 56.58 MT of RUTF transported to CMAM sites. Famix/CSB distributed Metric Tones 76.11 188.51 Oil distributed (WFP) Metric Tones 10.96 10.96 OTP/SC sites received NFIs (indicate Number 75 75 75 OTP and 15 SC sites were type) equipped with OTP/ SC materials, drugs and received technical and logistical support from IMC Other major deliverables (indicate type and number) Health professionals trained Number 67 66 One invited nurse could not attend due to a personal reason. male 21 Female 45 UNICEF-366 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 49,317 58,800 UNICEF was able to procure beneficiaries 64,920 cartons of RUTF instead of the planned 45,853 due saving made under other budget lines SAM children treated no of children under 5 49,317 58,800 Plan Int'l - 367 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment 56 | Page

Total beneficiaries No of direct 8710 10508 beneficiaries Women 3052 4495 Girls 2307 3122 Men 420 125 Boys 2931 2776 SAM children treated Number 787 2549 Girls 347 1274 Boys 440 1275 SAM cases with complication treated Number 91 Girls 44 Boys 47 MAM children treated Number 4451 3258 Girls 1960 1804 Boys 2491 1454 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 2836 4215 RUTF/plumpy nut distributed Metric Tones 17.4 17.4 Famix/CSB distributed Metric Tones 111.1 110.1 from other source (indicate source) WFP WFP Oil distributed (indicate source) Number 15.49 15.85 Health Extension Workers trained Number 152 152 Male 0 Female 152 152 OTP/SC sites received NFIs (indicate 79 79 type) SC UK-370 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 7,167 7,612 beneficiaries Women 1,488 2,985

57 | Page

Girls 2782 2267 Men 0 0 Boys 2896 2360 SAM children treated Number 615 486 Girls 301 238 Boys 314 248 SAM cases with complication treated Number 62 15 Girls 31 7 Boys 31 8 MAM children treated Number 5063 4141 Girls 2481 2029 Boys 2582 2112 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 1488 2985 RUTF/plumpy nut distributed Metric Tones 8 6 Famix/CSB distributed Metric Tones 123 134 from other source (indicate source) WFP 172.3 134 Oil distributed (indicate source) Number 17688 19240 Mobile health clinics established Number 0 0 Health Extension Workers trained Number 43 42 Male 22 21 Female 21 21 ACF - 379 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 1500 1260 583 SAM and 677 MAM beneficiaries Women Girls 705 298 SAM and 407 MAM Men Boys 285 285 SAM and 270 MAM

58 | Page

SAM children treated Number 568 Girls 285 Boys 283 SAM cases with complication treated Number 15 Girls 10 Boys 5 MAM children treated Number 677 Girls 407 Boys 270 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 1041 RUTF/plumpy nut distributed Metric Tones 11.6 Health Extension Workers trained Number 8-20 60 In addition 484 Health Development Agents (40M and 69F), which used to be called Community Volunteers, 7 HEW supervisors (7M) and 21govt nurses and health officers (18M; 3F) also took trainings on CMAM management. Male 0 Female 60 Plan Int'l - 380 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 80,681 beneficiaries Women 50,402 Girls 1,803 Men 26,860 Boys 1616 SAM children treated Number 1939 2481 Girls 970 1352

59 | Page

Boys 969 1129 SAM cases with complication treated Number 221 Girls 127 Boys 94 MAM children treated Number 4,043 684 Girls 2025 324 Boys 2018 360 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 1209 315 Famix/CSB distributed Metric Tones 67.2 22.1 from HRF's Central Procurement facility WFP from other source (indicate source) Oil distributed (indicate source) Number 8040 3090 Health Extension Workers trained Number 150 170 Male 14 Female 156 OTP/SC sites received NFIs (indicate 7 SC type) Orientation Training for HAD and FDA 478 Male 32 Female 446 Health educations in 8 main topics 76,299 Male 26,814 Female 49,485 SC US- 384 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 4,662 1,618 Project delayed significantly & beneficiaries started in November,2012 due to Save the Children International transition process Women 958 510

60 | Page

Girls 1813 543 Men 0 0 Boys 1887 565 SAM children treated Number 421 184 Girls 206 90 Boys 215 94 SAM cases with complication treated Number 42 6 Girls 21 3 Boys 21 3 MAM children treated Number 3279 924 This number was screened but not treated due to lack of CSB & Oil until December,2012 end Girls 1607 453 Boys 1672 471 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 958 510 this number was screened but not treated due to lack of CSB & Oil until December,2012 end RUTF/plumpy nut distributed Metric Tones 5.2 2.3 Famix/CSB distributed Metric Tones 79 18 from HRF's Central Procurement facility from other source (indicate source) WFP 126 Oil distributed (indicate source) Litre 11,440 2,581 Mobile health clinics established Number 10 10 Health Extension Workers trained Number 42 46 Male 9 10 Female 33 36 GOAL - 394 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 44,777 40,951 A total of 40,951 beneficiaries beneficiaries reached through the SFP program 61 | Page

Women and reported until February 28, Girls 2013. Additional beneficiaries reached and sex disaggregated Men data will be included in the next report MAM children treated Number 24,872 21820 Pregnant and nursing mothers treated Number 19,905 19132 from other source (indicate source)- Metric Tones 832.9 832.9 HRF provided a DIK of CSB and WFP store Oil for SFP program worth of Oil distributed (indicate source) - WFP Liter 131,331 134,333 $836,039 and the food was store collected from WFP store EFSL-Seed

FAO-355 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 20,000 25,401 Female headed households 2,442 Male headed households 22,959 Wheat seed distributed Quintal Maize seed distributed Quintal Teff seed distributed Quintal 1,065 1,065 Barley seed distributed Quintal Haricot bean distributed Quintal 1,450 1,275 the remaining balance will be procured through no cost extension period during CRS-356 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 12,214 20,202 Female headed households 4,886 6,449 Male headed households 7,328 13,753 Wheat seed distributed Quintal 3009 3327 Teff seed distributed Quintal 781 700

62 | Page

Haricot bean Quintal 751 501 Total land covered Hectare 5,360 5,052 Number of farmers trained (indicate Number 12,214 9,450 type of training) The focused timely weed control, the use of fertilizer, pest management and post-harvest management Female 4,886 1,875 Male 7,328 7,575 FHE-357 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 18342 19587 Female headed households Number of Households 5502 3119 Male headed households Number of Households 12840 16468 Wheat seed distributed Quintal 1600 2148 Teff seed distributed Quintal 1800 2264 Haricot bean distributed Quintal 500 280 Chickpea distributed Quintal 500 0 Number of farmers trained (on gender Number 302 mainstreaming) Female Number 195 Male Number 107 Number agricultural extension workers Number 25 17 trained on gender mainstreaming Female Number 3 Male Number 14 GOAL - 358 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 16,802 29,402 Female headed households 2,520 3,407 Male headed households 14,282 25,995

63 | Page

Haricot bean seed distributed Quintal 4,200 6,300 Number of farmers trained (Training on Number 1,174 1,174 Post-Harvest Handling and Disaster Risk Reduction) Female 148 Male 1,026 Number agricultural extension workers Number 16 12 trained(Training on Post-Harvest Handling and Disaster Risk Reduction) Female 1 Male 11 World Vision- Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark 359 Accomplishment Haricot Bean seed distributed Quintal 1000 350 Teff seed distributed Quintal 1060 1494 Wheat seed distributed Quintal 1100 1395 Chickpea distributed Quintal 250 291

Concern-368 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 13,810 16,257 Female headed households 5,524 2,924 Male headed households 8,286 13,333 Wheat seed distributed Quintal 1640 1,848 Improved variety Maize seed distributed Quintal Teff seed distributed Quintal 380 310 Improved variety Barley seed distributed Quintal Chickpea distributed Quintal 300 650 Local variety Haricot Bean Quintal 0 50 Improved variety Lentils distributed Quintal 300 390 Local variety

64 | Page

Total land covered Hectare 5,956 FAO-371 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 12,500 11,345 Female headed households 2,002 Male headed households 9,343 Sweet potato cuttings distributed Number 10 million 10 million Cassava cuttings distributed Number 750,000 0 CRS-372 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 5,564 4,348 Female headed households 1,669 1,217 Male headed households 3,895 3,131 Potato tubers quintals 2,668 1,468 Sweet potato cuttings distributed Number 4,503,280 Total land covered Hectare 214 144

FHE-373 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 2500 2680 Female headed households 750 671 Male headed households 1750 2009 Irish potato Quintal 2,280 2,545 Sweet potato cuttings distributed Number 225,000 135,416 Number of farmers trained (on gender Number 80 mainstreaming training) Female Number 34 Male Number 46 Number agricultural extension workers Number 15 6 trained on gender mainstreaming

65 | Page

Female Number 0 Male Number 6 GOAL-374 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 9880 5,867 Female headed households 1,482 1,847 Male headed households 8,398 4,020 Sweet potato cuttings distributed Number 9,880,000 5,867,000 World Vision- Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark 375 Accomplishment Sweet potatoes Cuttings 6,000,000 6,500,000 Irish Potatoes Quintal 3150 5525 Number of farmers trained Gender Number Mainstreaming training Improved farming techniques) Female Number 350 398 Male Number 150 146 Concern - 376 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 12,500 7,074 Female headed households 3,750 1,854 Male headed households 8,750 5,193 Sweet potato cuttings distributed Number 18,750,000 10,574,491 Implementation in progress Concern-377 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 5000 5360 Female headed households Number of Households 919 Male headed households Number of Households 4441 Number agricultural extension workers Number 20 trained

66 | Page

Female Number 16 Male Number 4 IMC-378 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 7500 7177 Female headed households 1,505 Male headed households 5,672 Sweet potato cuttings distributed Number 7,900,000 7,177,000 the cost of sweet potato cutting has increased by 0.07 cents per sweet potato cutting Number agricultural extension workers Number 72 87 agricultural extension workers were trained trained on food security Female 12 Male 75 GOAL-382 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 30,004 34,728 Female headed households 4,500 2,690 Male headed households 25,504 32,038 Wheat seed distributed Quintal 3565.32 3565.32 Teff seed distributed Quintal 390.02 390.02 Haricot bean seed distributed Quintal 0 1039 Chickpea distributed Quintal 1714 1714 EFSL-Livestock

VSF S - 329 Measurable Indicators ( activity/ Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark output) Accomplishment Total beneficiaries # of HHs 10542 10542 Female headed households # of HHs 4,380 4380 Male headed households # of HHs 6,162 6162

67 | Page

Number of livestock treated for three # 30000 467352 basic treatments ( internal parasite, external parasite and infectious diseases) Camel # 36726 Cattle # 43953 Shoat # 386673 Number of vaccine doses injected per # dose 100,000 158280 Livestock ( 3 different vaccines for cattle and shoat) Camel ,, 0 Cattle ,, 7200 Shoat ,, 151080 Number of animal destocked for # 1782 meat distribution (indicate type) Camel ,, 20 Cattle ,, 135 Shoat ,, 1627 Amount of meat distributed for targeted kg 30000 30000 Beneficiary Number of trained animal health person 92 75 workers ( refresher training) Albendazole 300 mg Bolus 537400 537400 Albendazole 2500 mg Bolus 131,078 131078 Oxytetracycline 20% of 100 ml bottle Vial 14,000 14000 Ivermectin vial of 50cc Vial 10200 10200 Acaricide Litter 1036 1036 Veterinary Equipment and antiseptics Ice box large (28 litters) Pcs 20 20

68 | Page

Cooler jug ( 10 litter size) Pcs 20 20 Knapsack sprayer of 15- 20 liter size pcs 80 80 Automatic Vaccination syringe 30ml Pcs 90 90 Automatic Vaccination syringe 20ml Pcs 65 65 Vaccination needle 16/17 G x 0.5 Dozen 240 240 Spare-varl glass for 20 cc Automatic Pcs 220 220 vaccination syringe Spare-varl glass for 30 cc Automatic Pcs 220 220 vaccination syringe Non disposable Treatment syringe 20 Pcs 160 160 ml Non disposable Treatment Syringe 10 Pcs 160 160 ml Treatment needle for cattle 16/17 G x Dozen 200 200 1.5 Treatment needle for sheep and Dozen 260 260 Goat 18/19 G x1 CAHWs Kit (canvas bag) Pcs 94 94 Thermometer digital Pcs 95 95 Straight scissor of 15-18 cm Pcs 90 90 Forceps straight Pcs 90 90 Eye Goggle, for eye protection during Pcs 100 100 spraying Nose mask- plastic, for inhale Pcs 100 100 protection during spraying Utility plastic hand Glove- arm length, Pair 92 92 for hand protection during spraying Miscellaneous Antiseptics Wound spray 200-300 cc Tin 150 150 Alcohol Liter 68 68 Savlon Litter 20 20 Iodine Litter 20 20

69 | Page

Cotton roll Roll 15 15 VSF G - 330 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 8,500 HHs( food insecure households) or 52,000 individuals benefited from the nutrition based livestock off-take project Number of animal treated/dewormed Number 759,664 livestock of (indicate type) different species treated in Somali region Ethiopia. Number of animal destocked for meat Number 30,000 kg of fresh camel distribution meat distributed for 500 (indicate type) drought affected families who have children at emergency services to supplement their food basket on protein-intake

Number of animal destocked for Number commercial (indicate type) Number of trained animal health Number 45 LEGS(livestock workers Emergency Guidelines and Standards) participants manual developed and distributed and 45 government vet officers and 24 CAHWs trained

70 | Page

Other major deliverables (indicate type 61 community dialogues and number) and facilitations organized on meat handling, hygiene, animal health voucher scheme and 10 sets of slaughtering kits distributed to 10 self help woman groups SSA-362 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 4000 4114 Achieved beneficiaries Women 2500 2387 Combined figure for women & girls Girls Men 1500 1727 Achieved. Combined figure for Boys men & boys At least 75% of the milking goats Goats 0.60 lt. / goat 0.89 lt. / goat Achieved provided with animal feed will produce an average of 0.6 litres/day of milk by the end of the project period. Up to 8 milking goats per household Kilograms 18kg 18kg Achieved have access to 18 kg of concentrate feed (per animal) during the project cycle. Up to 8 milking goats per household Goats 32,000 goats 31,999 goats Treated for internal parasites as at have access animal health services the interim stage of the project. A (based on needs) during the project full report to be provided in the final cycle. report. VSF-363 Measurable Indicators ( activity/ Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark output) Accomplishment Total beneficiaries # of HHs 3,000 4,000 Female headed households # of HHs 1,200 2,105 Male headed households # of HHs 1,800 1895 Number of livestock treated for three # 34,000 194,863

71 | Page

basic treatments ( internal parasite, external parasite and infectious diseases) Camel # 14,737 Cattle # 11453 Shoat # 168,673 Target livestock for supplementary feed # 16,000 Camel # 0 Cattle # 0 Shoat # 16,000 16,000 Number of trained animal health # 30 29 workers trained Quintal of concentrate purchased and Quintals 4320 6480 distributed Veterinary drugs purchased and distributed Albendazole 300 mg Bolus 180,000 180,000 Albendazole 2500 mg Bolus 33,000 33,000 Oxytetracycline 20% of 100 ml bottle Vial 4,560 4560 Ivermectin vial of 50cc Vial 3,600 3,600 Acaricide Litter 320 320 Veterinary Equipment and antiseptics Ice box large (28 litters) Pcs 20 5 Cooler jug ( 10 litter size) Pcs 20 5 Knapsack sprayer of 15- 20 liter size pcs 80 15 Automatic Vaccination syringe 30ml Pcs 90 15 Automatic Vaccination syringe 20ml Pcs 65 15 Vaccination needle 16/17 G x 0.5 Dozen 240 60 Spare-varl glass for 20 cc Automatic Pcs 220 50 vaccination syringe Spare-varl glass for 30 cc Automatic Pcs 220 60

72 | Page

vaccination syringe Non disposable Treatment syringe 20 Pcs 160 20 ml Non disposable Treatment Syringe 10 Pcs 160 20 ml Treatment needle for cattle 16/17 G x Dozen 200 48 1.5 Treatment needle for sheep and Goat Dozen 260 60 18/19 G x1 CAHWs Kit (canvas bag) Pcs 94 15 Thermometer digital Pcs 95 15 Straight scissor of 15-18 cm Pcs 90 15 Forceps straight Pcs 90 15 Eye Goggle, for eye protection during Pcs 100 15 spraying Nose mask- plastic, for inhale Pcs 100 15 protection during spraying Utility plastic hand Glove- arm length, Pair 92 15 for hand protection during spraying Miscellaneous Antiseptics Wound spray 200-300 cc Tin 150 40 Alcohol Liter 68 15 Savlon Litter 20 5 Iodine Litter 20 5 Cotton roll Roll 15 5 GOAL-389 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 30,388 19,556 beneficiaries Women HH which have got LSD 4,558 9,778 vaccination for their Cattle Men HH which have got LSD 25,830 48549 vaccination for their Cattle 73 | Page

Cattle have been vaccinated for LSD No of cattle 1,367,500 1,323,727 Purchase and support LSD vaccine dose 1,367,500 1,367,500 Vaccination syringes support PCS 894 894 Vaccination needle support PCS 13,750 13,750 EFSL-Flood Mitigation

FAO-340 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Person 136,875 136,875 Women Person 52,623 52,623 Girls Person 16,940 16,940 Men Person 50,824 50,824 Boys Person 16,488 16,488 Number households protected from households 27,375 27,375 flooding hazard Number households not displaced households 800 968 during rainy season Hectares of farm lands protected from ha 8,000 8,000 flooding Hectares of grazing area/lands ha 1,500 1,500 protected from flooding Gabion structure build to mitigate m3 22,050 26,586 flooding PCS of gabions utilized to protect flood pcs 11,025 13,293 damage kg of gabion tying wire utilized for kg 11,025 13,293 gabion making closes areas of upper catchments for ha 12,400 12,060 protect flooding Soil/earth embankment build on km 67,810 166,514 High performance contributed due riversides to protect flooding to the supply of machinery from the regional government and project contributed running costs (fuel and DSA for operators)

74 | Page

- Seeds kg 400 671 - Seedlings number 14,000 15,500 - cuttings number 24,000 27,750 - Training of community Person 140 140 representatives/Kebeles leaders - Beneficiaries Person 500 719 - Technical and gabion makers Person 70 245 More number of gabion workers required to complete the work before the rain fall intensified

- DAs, Woreda and Zonal experts Person 80 92 Flood mitigation tools purchased and number 1,060 850 distributed to improve the capacity of the community FAO-341 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 12435 12435 Female beneficiaries Number 31,865 31,865 Male headed households Number 30,310 30,310 Female children Number 6,021 6,021 Male children Number 5661 5,661 Length of river bank de-silted Meter 1,000 4,150 Volume of river bank de-silted m3 37,500 129,300 Gabion construction on river m3 11,430 14,266 embankment Jatropha Cutting 2000 2000 Susbania kg 100 200 Sisal Seedling 7000 8500 Pigeon peas Kg 100 271.25 Napier grass, Kesele, Kurekura, Cutting 10000 13750 Mornga, Besana, and Grare

75 | Page

Capacity Building Training for Project No. 390 620 Stakeholders (on flood mitigation) Female No. 100 256 Male No. 390 364 Pick axe No. 100 100 Shovel No. 50 25 Spade No. 50 50 Crowbar (dijino- 35-40mm dia and 2m No. 100 100 long-one flat and other pointed) Sledge hammer (5kg) No. 40 30 Wedge (shibilik- 50mm dia and 50cm No. 50 25 long, one side pointed) Spirit levels (line levels) No. 30 30 Measuring tape No. 10 10 Health

WHO-344 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Person 1,290,482 1,517,857 Women 658,146 774107 Men 632,336 743750 Number of people vaccinated against Person 1,000,000 850,000 Meningitis Male 490,000 416,500 Female 510,000 433,500 Number of children vaccinated against 150,000 127,500 Measles Female 76,500 65,025 Male 73,500 62,475

76 | Page

Number of health extension workers Person 330 400 HEW are all (100%) Female trained Female 330 400 Number of Woredas with Emergency Woredas 33 60 tools protocols, guidelines including case definition Merlin-385 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 35156 27118 77% beneficiaries Women 7000 10065 144% Girls 12300 5689 46% Men 8100 5736 71% Boys 7756 5628 73% Number of AWD cases treated Number 2447 202 8% Male 100 Female 102 Number of children vaccinated against Number 2785 785 28% Measles Female 436 Male 349 NFI

UNHCR -327 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 5000 HHs (20,000 5000 HHs (20,000 indv.) indv.) Blankets pce 9,921 9,921 Plastic sheet pce 7,000 7,000 Jerry can (20 litres) pce 7,500 7,500 Soap pce 46,000 46,000 Bucket 15 litres Pce 7,053 7,053 77 | Page

Kitchen set type B Set 3,000 3,000 Sleeping mat Pce 6,235 6,235 Mosquito net pce 10,000 10,000 Sanitary kits Number 20,700 20,700 Underwear for women (3 per person for 13,800 13,800 6 months) Tent Pce 600 600 IOM-338 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 1800 1,800 Female headed households 692 Male headed households 1,108 Blankets pce 2 3,600 Plastic sheet pce 2 3,600 Hessian Bag pce 1 1,800 Jerry can (10ltr) pce 2 3,600 Jerry can (20ltr) pce 1 1,800 Soap pce 10 18,000 Basins, plastic pce 2 3,600 plates, plastics pce 2 7,200 Cups, plastics pce 2 3,600 Jugs, plastics pce 1 1,800 Cooking pot pce 1 1,800 Ladles, aluminum pce 1 1,800 Mosquito net pce 1 1,800 Sleeping Mat pce 1 1,800 Oxfam GB -337 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 4,088 3,636

78 | Page

Female headed households People 29,000 29,211 Full kit Received 2,939 Partial kit received 697 Laundry soap(10) 40,880 36,360 Jerry can of20L(1) 4,088 3,636 Cooking Pot(1) 4,088 3,636 Blanket(2) 8,176 5,4 16 Plastic bucket(1) 4,088 3,636 Plastic Cup(2) 8,176 7,272 Plastic Plate(2) 8,176 7,292 Ladle(1) 4,088 3,636 Mosquito net(1) 4,088 3,636 ZOA-342 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households Female headed households 3206 3206 Male headed households 1035 1035 Child headed households 259 259 Blankets 9000 9000 Shelter materials (indicate type and 410 410 only constructed shelters with number) corrugated iron sheet, wooden materials Jerry can 3600 3600 Soap 49500 49500 Basins, plastic 4500 4500 plates, plastics 9000 9000 Cups, plastics 9000 9000 Jugs, plastics 4500 4500 Cooking pot 4500 4500

79 | Page

Mosquito net 4500 4500 COOPI-347 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 3473 HH 2978 HH Verification assessment conducted Female headed households at the beginning of the project revealed actual IDPs are 3328hh. Male headed households Out of this 350hh have already Child headed households received NFI by other agency (CCM). So the project targeted 2978hh for NFI distribution. Blankets pce 6946 5956 Plastic sheet pce 6946 5956 Shelter materials (indicate type and 0 0 number) Jerry can (20lit) pce 3473 2978 Soap (laundry) pce 34730 29780 Basins, plastic pce 3473 2978 plates, plastics pce 6946 5956 Cups, plastics pce 6946 5956 Jugs, plastics pce 3473 2978 Cooking pot pce 3473 2978 Ladles, aluminum pce 3473 2978 Mosquito net pce 6946 5956 Sanitary kits Number 0 0 Other major deliverables (indicate type and number) Jerry can (10lit) pce 0 5956 Sleeping Mat pce 3473 2978 Rope m 69460 59560 Hessian bag pce 3473 2978 HH Water treatment tabs (Aquatabs) strips 159722 157834

80 | Page

Plan -353 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Women number 2765 2765 Girls number 4953 4953 Male children's under aged under five. the NFI is distributed to SC and OTP sites. Female children's aged under five Boys number 4626 4626 Male children's under aged under five. The NFI is distributed to SC and OTP sites. Mattress Pcs. 50 50 Pillow Pcs. 60 60 Pillow Case Pair 240 240 Bed Spread Pcs. 160 160 Rubber sheet Roll 4 4 Red color No. 20 20 Green color No. 20 20 Blue Color No. 20 20 Baby Basin No. 60 60 Red color No. 56 56 Green color No. 56 56 Blue Color No. 56 56 Large Size No. 17 17 Medium Size No. 17 17 Wall Watch No. 10 10 Large Bowell No. 200 200 Vacuum No. 17 17 Admission bed No. 25 25 Bed side shelf No. 25 25 Stove No. 15 15

81 | Page

Service tree No. 25 25 Linen Pair 320 320 Large Pcs. 60 60 Small Pcs. 40 40 Measuring Jug No. 10 10 Jerry-can with tab No. 68 68 Table No. 10 10 Chair No. 15 15 Measuring Jug No. 50 50 Plastic Cups No. 580 580 Plan - 367 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Blankets pce 120 120 Plastic sheet roll 7 7 Jerry can pce 9 9 Soap pce 50900 50900 for MAM and SAM beneficiaries Basins, plastic pce 70 70 Jugs, plastics pce 80 80 Other major deliverables (indicate type 300 roach killer, cleaning wire and number) IOM-369 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Number of Households 4,000 5,300 Female headed households 2,544 Male headed households 2,756 Blankets pce 2 10,600 Plastic sheet pce 2 10,600 Hessian Bag pce 1 5,300 Jerry can (10ltr) pce 2 10,600

82 | Page

Jerry can (20ltr) pce 1 5,300 Soap pce 10 53,000 Basins, plastic pce 2 10,600 plates, plastics pce 2 10,600 Cups, plastics pce 2 10,600 Jugs, plastics pce 1 5,300 Cooking pot pce 1 5,300 Ladles, aluminum pce 1 5,300 Mosquito net pce 1 5,300 Sleeping Mat pce 1 5,300 Gender and HIV awareness raising Percentage 80% 98% Plan -380 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Blankets pce 30 40 Plastic sheet m 250 1,025 Jerry can pce 100 124 Soap pce 2,500 3,300 Basins, plastic pce 80 119 plates, plastics pce 30 40 Cups, plastics pce 320 430 Jugs, plastics pce 150 168 Cooking pot pce 12 20 Sanitary kits Number 5 10 Bed pce 20 25 Bed sheet pce 55 65 Mattress pce 35 40 Mattress caver pce 40 45 Kerosine Stove pce 1 1

83 | Page

Electric Stove pce 1 1 Termoflsk pce 4 6 Broom pce 30 30 Time watch pce 2 2 Graphic paper Roll 180 232 Plastic ball pce 13 15 WASH

WV-334 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 15,000 12,946 beneficiaries Women 2,480 Girls 3,144 Men 3,502 Boys 3,437 Water points constructed (indicate the Number 14 11 Birkat ( water point) type eg. hand dug well, bore whole, birkat etc...) Number of expansion works of water Number 14 11 points (pipe line extension) Number of institutional latrines with Number 6 hand wash facility constructed Men/boys 500

Women/girls 470

Unspecified 120 Number of institutional latrines Number 3 3 maintained Liters of water distributed Litters 20 21 Number of hand wash facility Number 139 139

84 | Page

constructed

Male 195 155

Female 190 152

IMC-335 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 38,536 29,996 refugees beneficiaries Women 18,279 refugees

Men 11,717

Number of Household latrines Number 280 280 constructed Number of jerry cans distributed Number was not in the plan 4064 Based on baseline survey results it was found that refugees are more interested to use small water containers as a hand washing facility thus, International Medical Corps procured and distributed 4,064 water containers /Jerry-cans/ to households. Number of hand wash facility Number 280 140 IMC installed 140 hand washing constructed facilities at public institutions (schools, community nutrition centre and health centres) and public areas (tea-houses and restaurants) Plan-353 Other major deliverables (indicate type and number) solid waste collection points established Number 276 289 100%+ achieved and in use

85 | Page

blocks of shower installed maintained Number 200 50 Due to cost inflation of construction and in use materials, the budget did not allow installing more than 50 bathing shelters blocks. In addition, communal bathing shelters are not well accepted by the refugees.

cloth washing basins/troughs Number 22 0 Based on the KAP survey result, constructed at water fetching points the plan was changed to distribution of individual cloth washing basins. IMC procured and distributed 7,000 basins to Bokolmnayo household; of which 3,500 basins were procured using HRF money School sanitation and hygiene facilities Number 1 1 construction of one sex segregated school latrine with hand washing facility was completed. The latrine has two partitions with 6 seats (three for girls and three for boys)

Training to Sanitation Field workers Number of sanitation 20 20 20 male sanitation field workers field workers trained on basic latrine construction, communication and reporting skills. Training to volunteers on solid waste Number of volunteers 45 45 management Community health promoters training Number of Community 40 40 CHW trained Health promoters school hygiene clubs established and Number of school clubs 1 school club and 30 1 school club teachers trained and teachers teachers established and 30 teachers trained population reached with Sanitation and beneficiaries 14900 15,096 Hygiene promotion messages IMC-361 86 | Page

Total beneficiaries No of direct 43290 33848 beneficiaries Water tabs No of tabs 65000 50772 IMC provided all planned 65,000 strip to woreda health offices which will continue distributing to target beneficiaries after this project end date. other (indicate type and amount) Water points rehabilitated (indicate the Number 9 9 1 motorized borehole and 8 spring type eg. hand dug well, bore whole, maintained the borehole birkat etc...) rehabilitation will benefit 5000 people. Number of institutional latrines with Number 3 4 Two sex-segregated latrines with hand wash facility constructed four seat and two sex-segregated latrines with two seats constructed at health facilities which have CMAM services Number of water tanks distributed Number 8 8 10,000 liter plastic water reservoirs (ROTOs) to eight health centers was installed Number of jerry cans distributed Number 1000 1000 Target achieved Number of Kebeles with SCs adopt Number 3 3 3 villages adopted CLTS and Community Led Total Sanitation declared as open defecation free (CLTS) approach villages Number of community and religious Number 90 140 Sensitization sessions were leaders reached with Hygiene and organized to involve the community Sanitation sensitization sessions as an owner of the project

Number of IEC materials will be Number 10200 10200 9,000 leaflets and 200 flip-charts developed and distributed distributed. Number of health institutions provided Number 8 8 with roof rain water harvesting system Number of health institutions provides Number 82 82 with household water filtration equipment

87 | Page

Number of District and Kebele Hygiene Number 3 3 and Sanitation committees strengthened Number of District EHW, HEW and Number 150 140 6 EHW, 57 HEW and 77 community volunteers provided with Community volunteers were taken TOT and refresher training on the TOT and refresher training Community Lead Total Sanitation (CLTS) Number of WASHCO members Number 90 96 WASHCO members trained for provided refresher training on operation proper management and operation and management of rehabilitated of water systems schemes; 3 portable water quality testing kits will be provided IMC-365 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 23,487 30,222 beneficiaries Water tabs No of tabs 68,000 68,000 strips of water 20,000 community members treatment chemicals benefited the aqua tabs distributed (Aqua tabs) for three and half months

Water points rehabilitated (indicate the Number 13 13 One borehole rehabilitated, Six type shallow wells rehabilitated and Six eg. hand dug well, bore whole, birkat springs rehabilitated. etc...) Number of institutional latrines with Number 3 5 One latrine with four seat and four hand wash facility constructed latrines with two seat constructed in five health institutions. All the five latrines are segregated Number of jerry cans distributed Number 1,000 1,000 Number of WASH committee Number 35 35 sensitized/trained Number of Kebeles adapting CLT Number 3 3 approach Number of Communities and religion Number 60 60 leaders reached hygiene and sanitation sensitization sessions

88 | Page

Number of IEC material developed and Number 10,200 10,200 Leaflets, posters and flip-charts distributed were developed and provided during Global Hand Washing Day and to community mobilizers. Number of community volunteers Number 60 60 provided with basic and refresher trainings of hygiene and sanitation promotion Number of health facilities provided with Number 8 8 roof rain harvesting system Number of health institutions provided Number 87 87 with household water filtration Number of ECH, HEWs and Number 3 3 Community volunteers provided with TOT and refresher training on CLTS Number of portable water quality testing Number 3 3 kits provided IRC-383 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 54,350 54,350 beneficiaries Women 26,637 26,637 Men 27,713 27,713 Household water treatment chemicals HHs 40,097 distributed Pur Sachets Wuhagar Bottles The IRC finalized procurement of 7,453 bottles of Wuhagar. In addition, procurement of 47,380 bottles of wuhagar was underway by the end of the reporting period. Although there was no distribution during the reporting period, distribution is planned in the coming months. Water tabs No of tabs 89 | Page

Other (indicate type and amount) - Sachets The IRC finalized procurement of Bishangari 750,000 sachets of Bishangari. Although there was no distribution during the reporting period, distribution is planned in the coming months. Liters of water treated using the above Liters N/A A total of 69,333,000 liters of water mentioned water treatment chemicals will be treated at point of use upon completion of distribution of the above chemicals to target beneficiaries. Number of community level water Number 34 9 A total of nine water supply schemes treated systems (one developed spring and eight rehabilitated systems fitted with hand pumps) were disinfected using chlorine solution upon completion of construction and rehabilitation activities. Water points rehabilitated (indicate the Number 12 8 The IRC completed the type eg. hand dug well, bore whole, rehabilitation of eight wells fitted birkat etc...) with hand pumps. Major rehabilitation activities included replacement of existing damaged hand pumps and maintenance/construction of platforms. In addition, rehabilitation of seven shallow wells fitted with hand pumps and two boreholes was ongoing by the end of the reporting period.

90 | Page

Water points constructed (indicate the Number 22 3 The IRC completed the type eg. hand dug well, bore whole, construction of one spring water birkat etc...) source while the development of eight spring water sources was ongoing by the end of the reporting period. In addition, construction of two institutional water supply systems (rain water harvesting systems at schools and health facilities) were completed while the construction of eleven water points was ongoing by the end of the reporting period. Number of expansion works of water Number 2 0 By the end of the reporting period, points (pipe line extension) the IRC continues to work to expand one water supply system, including supply and installation of 2,500 meters of High Density Poly Ethylene (HDPE) pipe, and construction of eight tap stands. Number of household latrines Number N/A 10,790 Targeted beneficiaries took the constructed initiative to construct their own household latrines as well as hand washing stations. in female headed households in male headed households in child headed households Number of institutional latrines with Number 5 0 The IRC signed an agreement with hand wash facility constructed a local contractor for the construction of ten latrine blocks in six schools (three schools in Mareko Woreda, two schools in Chire Woreda, and one school in Bensa Woreda). Construction of these latrine blocks will be completed in April. Men/boys 3,373 0

91 | Page

Women/girls 3,284 0 Number of WASH committee Number 184 139 The IRC provided three-day sensitized/trained training for 139 Water Management Committee (WMC) members on proper operation and manage of their respective water supply systems; the training was facilitated by IRC's WASH team and the woreda water offices. In addition, 40 WMC members will receive similar trainings in April. Male 84 Female 55 Government Partners Disinfection Number 17 0 The IRC plans to train 15 Training government staff in March on how to undertake proper disinfection of water supply systems using chlorine solutions. Government Partner O&M Training Number 6 7 The IRC provided a four-day training for seven woreda water office staff (two from Bensa, two from Chire, and three from Mareko) on operation and maintenance of community water supply systems. Train HEWs on AWD case and safe Number 52 22 The IRC provided training for 39 water management HEWs (17 from Chire Woreda and 22 from Bensa Woreda) on AWD case management and prevention. Topics covered included symptoms of AWD, surveillance and reporting, case management and prevention methods.

92 | Page

Training for government staff on AWD Number 32 32 The IRC conducted three-day training for 32 government staff (12 in Mareko Woreda, 10 in Bensa Woreda, and 10 in Chire Woreda) on AWD prevention, mitigation and responses. The training was facilitated by IRC WASH team in coordination with trained woreda resource persons. Other major deliverables (distribution of Number 8,000 0 The IRC has commenced buckets with lids) procurement of 6,500 buckets with lid, each with 20 litre capacity. Distribution is expected to be completed in March. SSA-386 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 30,080 30,080 beneficiaries Women 12,930 12,930 Girls 2,847 2,847 Men 10,530 10,530 Boys 3,773 3,773 Water points rehabilitated (indicate the Number 8 hand dug wells; 1 3 hand dug wells; 1 During assessment, Save the type eg. hand dug well, bore whole, spring; 1 pond spring; 1 borehole water Children were as well rehabilitating birkat etc...) distribution; 1 pond boreholes in the region. 3 hand dug wells were rehabilitated. Savings realized were used to rehabilitate a pond and borehole piping Water points constructed (indicate the Number 5 hand dug wells; 4 3 hand dug wells; 3 type eg. hand dug well, bore whole, birkats; one elevated birkats; 1 elevated tank birkat etc...) tank;

Number of institutional latrines with Number 3 3 hand wash facility constructed Men/boys 2 2 Women/girls 2 2

93 | Page

Unspecified 1 1 Number of hand wash facility Number 3 3 constructed Number of bars of soap distributed Number 50,000 10,000 Number of WASH committee Number 14 10 Due to the reduction in the number sensitized/trained of hand dug wells to be constructed, it led to reduction of water committee to be trained. Other major deliverables (indicate type Number 12,500 31,453 and number) Sanitation and hygiene promotion ADRA-387 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 66,462 66,312 beneficiaries Household water treatment chemicals planned to be distributed in the distributed next phase Pur Sachets 12,735 0 Water points rehabilitated (indicate the Number 9 0 Completed in January type eg. hand dug well, bore whole, birkat etc...) Liters of water distributed Litters 1620000 1515000 The remaining water will be distributed in February 2013 Number of WASH committee Number 95 40 The training in Bare will take place sensitized/trained in January 2013 Male Number 67 37 Female Number 27 13 COOPI-392 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 7,104 beneficiaries Women/girls 3,252

94 | Page

Rehabilitation of Ponds Number 2 Site Identification, BoQ Delay on project MoU signing with preparation procurement the Regional Bureaus is delaying of materials completed the activity Rehabilitation of Hand dug wells Number 2 Site identification and technical assessment $ procurement of materials completed Rehabilitation and upgrading of 1 hand Number 1 Solar system design dug well to solar energy pumping completed, procurement system is under process Water points constructed (indicate the Number type eg. hand dug well, bore whole, birkat etc...) Construction of Birkas Number 2 Site Identification, BoQ Delay on project MoU signing with & Design preparation the Regional Bureaus is delaying and procurement of the activity materials completed Construction of Roof catchments Number 2 Site Identification, BoQ & Design preparation and procurement of materials completed Construction of Communal latrines Number 3 with separate Preliminary BoQ and blocks for men and design finalized and site women having 6 identified. cubicles each procurement of construction materials finalized. Number of WASH committee Number 77 Planned to be conducted in the last sensitized/trained month of the project after Male completing the rehabilitation/construction of the Female schemes Health

WHO-344 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries Person 1,290,482 1,517,857

95 | Page

Women 658,146 774107 Girls Men 632,336 743750 Number of people vaccinated against Person 1,000,000 850,000 Meningitis Male 490000 416500 Female 510000 433500 Number of children vaccinated against 150000 127500 Measles Female 76500 65025 Male 73500 62475

Number of health extension workers Person 330 400 HEWs are all (100%) Female trained Female 330 400

Number of Woredas with Emergency Woredas 33 60 tools protocols, guidelines including case definition Number of AWD cases treated Number 2447 202 8% Male 100 Female 102

Number of children vaccinated against Number 2785 785 28% Measles Female 436

Male 349

Number of health extension workers Number 142 trained

Merlin-385 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark 96 | Page

Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 35156 27118 77% beneficiaries Women 7000 10065 144%

Girls 12300 5689 46% Men 8100 5736 71% Boys 7756 5628 73% Number of emergency drug kits Number 4 distributed Number of mobile health workers Number 20 trained Emergency delivery kits distributed Number 420 Health clinics equipped with delivery Number 4 kits Number of AWD cases treated Number 2447 202 8% Male 100 Female 102 Number of children vaccinated against Number 2785 785 28% Measles Female 436 Male 349 Number of health extension workers Number 142 trained

Merlin-390 Measurable Indicators Unit of Measurement Project Plan Project Remark Accomplishment Total beneficiaries No of direct 25,262 4,104 beneficiaries Women 1781 Girls 548 Men 1104 Boys 671

97 | Page

Number of emergency drug kits Number The plan was to 0 We had no emergencies during the distributed distribute EDKs to reporting period, however we have 30 targeted health one kit on hand as contingency facilities; this was (donated by UNICEF) done from ECHO funding in Sept - Nov 2012 Number of mobile health clinics Number 3 0 None established during the established reporting period but we had 2 mobile health clinics functional which were established in August 2012 (under ECHO) Number of AWD cases treated Number No specific number 293 planned Male 158 Female 135 Number of children vaccinated against Number At least 90% of 0 Vaccinations are carried out by Measles children under one Woreda Health Office EPI staff and year old within the HEWs; Merlin has been providing catchment logistic support - transporting population are vaccines from WrHO and health vaccinated for centres to health posts as well as measles transporting EPI officers and HEWs to carry out vaccinations; Merlin movement schedule is in line with WrHO EPI schedule Number of health extension workers Number No specific number 16 trained planned however HEWs are a target group of formal trainings planned under this project

Female 7 Through EPI training Male 9

98 | Page

Number of on the job training and No specific number 46 Covering all functioning health supportive supervision sessions carried planned posts in Merlin targeted kebeles out at health posts Number of OPD sessions carried out by No specific number 51 Covering all Merlin targeted mobile health teams planned kebeles with no functioning health post Number of recipients of health No specific number 3,468 Topics covered - IYCF, nutrition, education and health promotion planned health care practice, WASH and messages delivered by mobile health proper utilisation of pharmaceutical teams products

99 | Page