Pierrepont Genealogies:: From
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Pierrepont Genealogies:: from. Norman times to .1913!11. with particular attention paid to the line of descent from Herekiah Pierpont,. youngest son ·of Rev. James Pierpont of New Haven BY R. BURNHAM MOFFAT PRIVATELY PRINTED 1913 COPYJUGIIT, 1913 Bv.R. BURNHAM MOFFAT ftft::· .. ..~: HOLME.PIERREPONT. NOTTIN,1HAMSHtRE. F.NGLASD. To M-rSoN JAY PIERREPONT MOFFAT EXPLANATION OF TERMS USED. b stands for .. bom.. ; d. for "died"; and m for .. married.., O. S. P. stand for olnt sine P,ole. meaning that the descendant whose name these letters follow died without issue; and S. P., standing for sine prok, mean that the descendant, though living, has had no issue at the date of this boo~ January I, I9IS. The numbers which immediately follow the names of descendants in the tables of descent contained in Chapter I indicate the generatiom in descent from the family of de Pierrepont in Normandy, and those in Chapters II and III indicate the generations of the American Branch in descent from the family in England. A t following the name of a descendant means that the writer has no information concerning !Zilch descendant, beyond that stated. CONTENTS. .PAGB Notes on the Pierrepont Arms.. • • • . • • • . • • xx CilAPTER L-The Pierrepont Family in Eng.land from Nor- man. times to the death of the last Dt1ke of IGngston, m x773 • - .. -• • • - -- • - -- -- • - - • • - • - -• • • • - -• • • • • .. • • • • '!5 CHAPTER IL-The American branc1't. of the family from its inception in the Englfuh line, excepting the descent from Hettkiab Pierpont, youngest son of Rev. James Pierpont of New Haven ..........•...•..•.. - . - . - • .Jo CHAPTER ill-Descent from HezeJcjab Pierpont, youngest son of Rev. James Pierpont of New Haven. • • • . 78 CHAPTER IV.-Notes eouceming Hurst-Pierrepont, Holm~ Pierrepont and Thoresby . • . • • • . • . • . • x19 CHAPTER V.-The Lost Dukedom, or the story of the Pierre- -pant C1a:iD:i. • - • - -• - •• - -• -•••••••• - • • • • • • .. • • • • • • • • 130 CHAPTER VI.-Notes concerning some of the descendants x56 CHAPTER VIL-Gilbert Stuart's Portrait of Washington... 184 ILLUSTRATIONS. PAGE HoLME-PmRREPONT, NO'I'TINGHAMSHIRB, .ENGLAND, • • a • • • • a • • • • • • • 91 • • • • • ■ ■ • • • 1' • • e • • • • FRON'I'ISP.JECE. THE PIERREPONT ARMs . • . • • . • . • . • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • 9 REv. JAMES PIERPONT AND MARY HOOKER, His WIFE.... 31: Tm: HOUSE OF JOHN PIERPONT, BUILT 1767.............. 79 THE OLD CHURCH AT H'ORST-PIERREPONT ••••••••••• - . 117 TooRESBY HALL IN 1833.......... • • • . • • • • • • • • . • • • • . • . 12x THE OLD PIERREPONT HOME ON BROOKLYN HEIGHTS IN T 838 . ■ ••••• ,. •••••• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 163 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES. PAGE BORR, AAiRoN ........ __ ................... _ 66 " .REv • .&RON . • . • . • • • • • .••• 51: " TBE0DOSIA •••••• .... - x6g DwJGHT7 TnfOTBY • ..••• 67 EDWARDS, ~ .• ·_ • - • - .... - • - ••••••••• - •••••••• - •••• 51 " REv. JONATBAN . .....•.•. ..... • -. -....... 40 " REv. JONATHAN, JR .••••• ss " HON. PlERPoNT . ...•••... 56 HERRICK., REv. CLA."ODIUS • • - • - ............ - ••••• - - •••••• :x66 " EDWA:RD CLA"UDIUS •• ••• - ••••••••• - - . - ••.••••• :xSI Mo~"TAGU, LADY MARY ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 27 PIERPONT, JAMES (of the oldest generation in America) .. 30 REv.. JAMES .................................... 35 " JOHN (the first of the family to come to America) 34 " JoHN (son of Rev. James) ..............••..••. 156 'REv. JO,H:ltil • • • ... • • • • • • • • • • • • • • - - - • • .. • • • • • • • • • • 63 " SARA.B. ...................................................... 40 PIERREPONT, HON. EDWARDS .....•.. - . - ..••.. - ••••.•••. i5 " EVELYN {last Duke of Kingston) ....... ~ •.•.. 28 " HD."'RY EVELYN ...••••. 178 " ~"'RY EVELYN, JR .... 182 " HEzEKIAH BEERS .. ....................... 159 REv.HEzEKI.AHBEERS ............... ~ .... 59 " WILLIAM. CoNST.ABLE - ...••••••••••••.•• - - - - 175 WOOLSEY. THEOI><;>RB DwIGHT ................••••...••.. 76 INDICES. Surname PIERREPONT ••••••••• 193 Surname PlERPoNT •..•••••• 195 Other Sumames .••.•...•.•• r97 FOREWORD. HESE pages grew out of a preparation of the record of descent from Hezekiah Pierpont, youngest son of Rev. T James Pierpont, of New Haven; and so far as that record is concerned, the writer believes that the table of descent con tained in Chapter m is accma.te, and, excepting afewminor omis sions, complete. To have brought down to date, in a snm7ar m8:0Der, a complete record of descent from each of the other five children of Rev. James Pierpont, who maniecl and had issue, would have been a task too great for the leiscre moments of the writer; and he does not claim complet.eness for the table of descent C()J'lt,amed in Chapter II. The data there given is taken chiefly, though not entirely, from a manuscript record entitled PEDIGREE OF PmlumPoNT prepared by Edward J. Marks in x88o; from the HOOKER GENE..U.OGY by Com. Edward Hooker, U.S. N., edited by his &mghter, Margaret Hrmtigton Hooker, and printed at Roches ter, N. Y., in 1909; and from an old book in marmscript1 now in the possession of John Jay Pierrepont, Esq., of Brooklyn, N. Y., containing certain genealogical information of the family brought down to 1792 by Hezelciah. Beers Pierrepont. Some of the bio graphical sketches found in this chapter have been taken from Ur-."IVERSITIES AND THEIR 5oNS, published in Boston, Mass., in 1898, by R. Herndon Company. These authorities are deemed respectable, and the lllforma tion contained in Chapter II is believed by the writer to be accu rate; and it is published here as of probable interest to many of the family to whom it may not otherwise be available. The coITeCtion of error in any part of the book will be cordially welcomed. 63 WALL STREET, NEw YoRKy R. B~ lL January I, 1913. THl3P1ERl'(EPONTAMS., TJDt Pn:lmEPoNT Ants. CA reprint of the anm will be 1CCS. on tlllaC 9-J DESCRIPTION. Alws: Argent, semee of cinquefoils, gules. A lion rampant, sable. CREsT: A fox passant proper, on a wreath. MOTTO: Pie repone te. The above are the arms which were borne by the family of Holme Pierrepont, at the time the American branch left Eng land (circ. r64,o). The ancestor of the American branch-as is shown in the Record of Descent contained in Chapter II of this book-was William Pierref11:mt1 third son of Sir George of Holme Pierre pont. William's son, James, was the father of John and Ro~ both of whom came to America about r640; and they in tum were followed to this country by their father, James. Sir George Pierrepont, Knt., carried on the family arms between the shield and the crest-a Knight's helmet; but the right then to do so belonged to him alol,le. His eldest son Henry, who was lmighted after his father's death, also carried a Knight's helmet; and when his son Robert was created Earl of Kingston upon Hull in r628, he superimposed an Earl's coronet in place of the helmet. This in turn was replaced by the Ducal coronet of the Duke of Kingston, who changed the crest to a lion rampant, sable, on a wreath, between two wings erect, argent; and he added supporters-the privilege of royalty and nobility and of those few commoners whom the crown may wish thus to honor-consisting of a lion rampant, sable, on the dexter and likewise on the sicister, Iangued and armed, gules. (That is, having the tongue and the claws of different tincture from the rest of the animal-in the Duke of Kingston's case, red.) With all that, however, the American branch has nothing to do. Some of the descendants in this country have imposed an Esquire's helmet (which is a closed helmet in profile) between the shield and the crest; but the propriety of their doing so is questionable. The helmet was never registered in the College of II 12 The Right to bear Arms. Arms, and it would seem better practice for those American descendants bearing the surname Pierrepont who desire to use arms at all, to confine themselves to the arms, crest and motto first above descn'bed and to omit altogether the helmet and the mantling or lambrequin. It goes without saying that a male descendant bearing a surname other than that of the family has no right whatever to the family arms, crest or motto ; and the limited right of a female descendant, even when bearing the family name, to use any part of the family arms is often not understood, or else is wholly ignore~ by the more ambitious of our American sisters to whom the display of the device is a gratification. While in the earlier and more warlike ages arms were not allowed to women under any circumstances, it finally came to pass that married women were suffered to assume the escutcheons of their husbands, and unmarried women those of their fathers; but even then the unmarried women and the wid ows who asserted their pretensions to arms were required to enclose them in a "lozenge," as it is termed in heraldry ( that is, an upright diamond or similar device on the field) in order to differentiate their arms from those of the husband or father. No woman, except a sovereign, could under any circumstances inh~ bear or transmit a crest or motto, and naturally not a helmet or mantling. If an "heiress'' in heraldry (that is, a woman whose father bore arms and had died leaving no sons or whose sons had all died without issue)-if an heiress married, the escutcheon ·or shield would pass with the marriage to her husband and he would have the right to quarter them on his own arms, if he wished to, and their children wouid inherit the double coat. Beyond this, a woman's right to arms has never extended.