Kinzie Industrial Corridor Infrastructure Study August 2020 Index

FOR PUBLIC REVIEW KINZIE INDUSTRIAL CORRIDOR INFRASTRUCTURE STUDY AUGUST 2020 INDEX

THE STUDY

Starting from August 2019, Chicago’s Department of Planning and Development (DPD) retained AECOM to analyze the infrastructure conditions within the Kinzie corridor from Lake Street to Hubbard Street and from Halsted Street to Odgen Avenue. The goal of this study was to identify existing condition infrastructure issues, opportunity sites that may be developed in the future, and infrastructure priorities for the area. The study will be used to inform future planning work in this area by both DPD and Chicago’s Department of Transportation (CDOT).

EXECUTIVE EXISTING OPPORTUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE NEXT STEPS SUMMARY CONDITIONS SITES PRIORITIES P. 3 P. 4-11 P. 12-18 P. 19-25 P. 26

APPENDIX P. 27-30

2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Kinzie Industrial Corridor, located immediately to the west of the Downtown Loop and Near North Side, is one of Chicago’s 26 Industrial Corridors. It spans approximately 854 acres between Halsted Street on the east and Kedzie Avenue on the west. The corridor blends Chicago’s historical meat packing and food distribution hub with the evolution to a technical and restaurant hub.

The City’s Industrial Corridor Modernization Initiative, which began in 2016, looks to review land use policies and structures to guide public and private investment, spurring employment and economic opportunities unique to each corridor. Planning and implementation actions for the Kinzie Industrial Corridor include the Chicago Plan Commission approval of the 2014 Fulton Market Innovation District Plan, the zoning ordinance change in 2017 to remove the Planned Manufacturing District 4 designation for a portion of the area east of Ogden and allowing the ability to use the downtown district designation with neighborhood opportunity bonus, and the Chicago Plan Commission approval of the 2019 Kinzie Industrial Corridor Framework Plan for the area west of Ogden. These actions have been attracting new development at higher densities than the manufacturing and industrial uses that had been Key Plan of Study Area typical of the eastern end of the Corridor. Thirty opportunity sites were ultimately identified for understanding of past and current real estate market Infrastructure Priorities: The list of recommended The Department of Planning and Development (DPD) vacant or under-developed lots in December 2019, trends of development. The Opportunity Sites were infrastructure projects to support the future initiated this study in August 2019 to consider the assumed as office, mixed-use, and hotel uses, mostly broadly divided into five zones across the project area: development were broken down into Transportation infrastructure needs to support future development comprised of multiple parcels. Existing conditions and Infrastructure categories and subsequent short within the section of the Kinzie Industrial Corridor analyses were reviewed in conjunction with the 1. Key Commercial Corridor northeast of area where and long-term projects based on existing development bounded by Halsted Street on the east, Ogden Avenue development scenarios to determine a prioritized list the higher densities have been approved; and opportunity sites. Some of these priorities would on the west, Hubbard Street on the north and Lake of infrastructure improvements that anticipate future require further study by CDOT and is also dependent on Street on the south. Existing public way and real growth in the area. 2. Historic District in the southeast where opportunity availability of funding. estate conditions were field inventoried in October sites are smaller; and November 2019 and mapped in Geographic The following document is organized around three • Infrastructure short term priorities include Information System (GIS) for use as the basis for main tasks: 3. Southwest Mixed-Use Commercial Corridor where upgrading 43 crosswalks, 33 ADA corner upgrades, understanding assets, gaps, and opportunities. full block developments may be possible; 6 at-grade train crossing improvements, connecting Existing Conditions: A field inventory of various the sidewalk network with over 21 blocks in missing The opportunity site analysis considered recent curbside conditions using ArcGIS Portal (Portal), a 4. Carroll Avenue Commercial Corridor where full sidewalks, and 182 lighting pole upgrades. Long- construction, approved and proposed Planned cloud-based geospatial system that allows for project block developments are anticipated; term projects include burying utilities, viaduct Developments (PD’s), current area market trends, and integration of GIS-based City data. improvements, adding bike lanes, and sidewalk the overall character context within and adjacent to the 5. Kinzie-Hubbard Corridor on the north where the widening. project area. Opportunity Sites: A designation of sites and a street network is interrupted due to the at-grade simulated scenario for development based on the train tracks • Transportation short term priorities include adding 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

7 Divvy Station locations, 9 bicycle facilities, 2 were provided for lighting improvements in the • CDOT is currently in the final design and traffic signals, 14 Transportation Network Company public way; individual developers will be required to engineering phase for Lake Street improvements (TNC) Zones, 10 viaduct improvements, 7 traffic address electrical upgrades for their own design and from Ashland to Halsted. control signage, and general wayfinding signage. procurement. Long-term projects include select street network • CDOT has also procured consultant services to study improvements and section improvements and Concluding components of this document include the proposed location, feasibility, and potential additional phasing for Divvy Stations, TNC Zones, next steps that describe immediate actions, ongoing funding sources for a new Metra station to serve this bicycle facilities and traffic signals. improvements, and available resources addressing area. both public and private entities to facilitate smart and Stormwater management, water services, and sewer coordinated growth in the area. Close coordination among public agencies specific loads and usage were determined for the opportunity to private and public projects on key circulation, sites. The key assessment is the likely need to up-size • DPD and CDOT will have developers start utility infrastructure issues, and consistent communication at localized water and sewer infrastructure within this coordination and review earlier in the design critical points of development will help foster a healthy, corridor, pending hydraulic modeling and analysis by process, and secure funding to start the design equitable, and vibrant Kinzie Industrial Corridor. the Chicago Department of Water Management (DWM), and engineering of the at-grade Metra crossing in order to accommodate the future demands of the improvements proposed developments. • DPD has created an online West Loop resource These exhibits and planning approach were reviewed guide to ensure easier access of planning with DWM, but require more detailed analysis for documents for this area. This webpage will be individual development proposals to ascertain updated with information about ongoing and specific improvements. Preliminary recommendations new planning initiatives in the area.

4 EXISTING OPPORTUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE CONDITIONS + SITES = PRIORITIES

5 EXISTING CONDITIONS GIS COLLECTOR DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

• Field survey of existing conditions using GIS Collector

• Data points include curblines, corner ramps, lightpoles and other infrastructure information

• Attributes can be filtered to create site specific dashboards

• Other City-based GIS data were mapped to assess issue and opportunities

Phone Interface

Computer Interface

6 EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS RIGHT-OF-WAY (ROW)

Study Area Alley ¹º»¼ At-Grade Metra Crossings 89:LMNO Signalized Intersections One-Way Streets  Eastbound  Northbound UP- N, UP-NW  Southbound  Westbound $+ Direction Change Right-of-Way width 66 80 04 Grand 100 " Paring Configuration Diagonal

Perpendicular MAY

GREEN

HALSTED RACINE

MORGAN

CARPENTER ABERDEEN ELIZABETH

PEORIA SANGAMON 89:LMNO HUBBARD

UP- W  KINZIE  +$ +$        $   +  ¹º»¼ ¹º»¼ Milw-N,¹º»¼ Milw-W,¹º»¼ NCS ¹º»¼  Green +$ Racine May Aberdeen Carpenter Morgan ¹º»¼

 $    + CARROLL WAYMAN  

  +$    FULTON       89:LMNO 

Morgan " LAKE 89:LMNO 89:LMNO" 89:LMNO

MAY

ADA GREEN

OGDEN

PEORIA

RACINE

HALSTED

MORGAN ABERDEEN

ELIZABETH

CARPENTER SANGAMON

UNION RANDOLPH PARK

Data Collected Fall 2019 7 0 175 350 Feet N EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS OPEN SPACE

Study Area Open Space Alley

Basement Flood Ris Storm Recurence Interval ! 5 Year ! 10 Year UP- N, UP-NW

Sewer Pipes Diameter (Inches) 15 15 - 24 24 - 60 > 60 04 Grand

MAY

GREEN

HALSTED RACINE

MORGAN

CARPENTER ABERDEEN ELIZABETH

PEORIA SANGAMON ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HUBBARD ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! UP- W ! KINZIE ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! ! Milw-N, Milw-W, NCS ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! CARROLL! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! WAYMAN ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!! ! FULTON ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Morgan ! ! ! " ! ! LAKE ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !" ! !

MAY

ADA GREEN

OGDEN

PEORIA

RACINE

HALSTED

MORGAN ABERDEEN

ELIZABETH

CARPENTER SANGAMON

UNION RANDOLPH PARK

Data Collected Fall 2019 8 0 175 350 Feet N EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS TRANSPORTATION ASSETS

Study Area

One-Way Streets  Eastbound  Northbound  Southbound  Westbound +$ Direction Change UP- N, UP-NW CTA Half-Mile (! Divvy Stations Bie Routes (! Bike Routes CTA Stations (! " Blue " 04 Grand " Pink/Green UV5 "" CTA Bus Routes CTA Bus Routes

¹º»¼ At-Grade Metra Crossings MAY

Metra Rail GREEN

HALSTED RACINE

MORGAN

CARPENTER ABERDEEN ELIZABETH PEORIA Metra Rail SANGAMON HUBBARD U V

UV5

UP- W  KINZIE  +$  +$        +$  ¹º»¼ ¹º»¼ Milw-N,¹º»¼ Milw-W,¹º»¼ NCS ¹º»¼ (!  +$ Racine May Aberdeen Carpenter Morgan Green¹º»¼

 $    + CARROLL WAYMAN  

(!    FULTON  +$       



Morgan "" LAKE (!""

MAY

ADA GREEN

OGDEN

PEORIA

RACINE

HALSTED

MORGAN ABERDEEN

ELIZABETH CARPENTER SANGAMON (! UNION RANDOLPH

PARK (! (!

J14

U V Data Collected Fall 2019 (! 9 0 175 350 (! (! Feet N EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP)

Study Area

CDOT Proects 201 to 2020 Planning/Design ADA Improvements Streetscape

Resurface UP- N, UP-NW

CIP Proects 201 Other (Banners, Landscape) Water Distribution Sewer Lining Streetscaping 04 Grand Major Street Improvements "

Sidewalk Improvements

MAY

GREEN

HALSTED RACINE

MORGAN

CARPENTER ABERDEEN ELIZABETH

PEORIA SANGAMON HUBBARD

UP- W KINZIE

Milw-N, Milw-W, NCS

CARROLL

WAYMAN

FULTON

Morgan " LAKE "

MAY

ADA GREEN

OGDEN

PEORIA

RACINE

HALSTED

MORGAN ABERDEEN

ELIZABETH

CARPENTER SANGAMON

UNION RANDOLPH PARK

Data Collected Fall 2019 10 0 175 350 Feet N EXISTING CONDITIONS INFRASTRUCTURE

Study Area Delivery Sites PD Location Proposed Opportunity Site

Eisting Condition Crosswalk (Missing or Basic) UP- N, UP-NW Sidewalk (Missing, Narrow or with Parking) Ramps >! Truncated Dome >! No Dome Streetlights ! Steel Pole 04 Grand !( Poor Condition "

! MAY

! ! GREEN HALSTED

RACINE !

MORGAN

CARPENTER ABERDEEN ELIZABETH PEORIA

! SANGAMON >! >! > > !>!! >! >! >!>!>! >>!>> >!> > > > > >! >> > > > > >! >! ! ! ! > !>@ >! > > > > ! ! @ ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! !! !>! !!! ! !>! !( !! >!! >!! >! HUBBARD > >! >@ >@ > > @ @ !> >! !> >! !> >! ! ! ! !> >> ! ! !(>> >> ! !( >! > ! ! >! > >! > ! > @ > > > ! ! @ !( ! ! ! ! !!(! >!! !!!! !>!>!! !>! >!!! ! ! !> >!! ! !>!>! ! >!! >!! ! !>! >>!!( !(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( ! !( !( ! ! !(!(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( > !( !( !( !( !(!( ! !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( > !(!( !(!( !( > ! !( !(!( !(!( ! !( ! !(!( !(!(!( > !( !(!( !(!( !(!( >! !(!(!(!( !( >! >! !( ! ! !(!(!(!(!( !( !( >! !(!(!(!( !( !( !( UP- W >!!( >! ! ! >!( ! !( >! >!( > !( !(! !@ >! >! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!( ! ! ! ! ! >! >! >! ! >! ! ! KINZIE !(!( !( >! @ >! >! >! >! >! >! >! >! >! >! >! > > > > !( !( !( > >! >!>! >!! ! ! !> >! >! > !(!(!( !( ! > !>! >! >!! !(!( !(!( ! ! ! !(!( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !(!( >!>! Milw-N, Milw-W, NCS !( ! ! !( ! !( >! >! >!@ !( ! > !( >! !( !( ! >! ! ! ! >!@ !( !( !( !( !( >! !( >! @ !( @ @ !( > ! ! !(> > > > >! > ! ! ! >!! !( !( !( >!!!>!!( !( >!( >! >! >! !( >! ! >! !( > @ @ @ > @ > !@ ! @ > > @ > ! !( > >!@ !( !( !( !( !( ! >! > !( !( !(!> >!!( !( > !> > CARROLL > @ @ ! ! ! ! @ !@ > > >! @ ! ! ! ! !( !! ! ! !( @ ! ! !( >!( > > >@ !( ! >!@ >!@ ! @ > ! @ !(! !( ! !( !( @ !(> @ !( !( !( !( !( >! >!!( !( >! !>! >!! ! @ @ > > WAYMAN !( !( !( >! >! >!!>!!!( !( !( >! @ !( !( @ @ ! !( !( !( !( !( !( !( ! !( !( !( !( > > >! > > > > > > >! >!( >> >!> >! !> >! >>! !( ! >> >! ! >!! >! ! ! >! !> >!! !! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! >! >! >! ! >! >! >! !( !! > > > > FULTON > !( >!> > > > !!> !(>> > >!> > >! >! > >! >!! ! >! >! >! > !( >!! !( !>!! ! >!! ! !( !! !!( !(!>!!!( !(!>!>! ! ! >! >! >! >(!!( !( ! !( !( !( !( ! > !( !( >! >! >! >! ! > !( !( ! > !( !( ! !( !( !( !( !( !!( !( >! !( >! !( >! > !( !( ! !( ! !( ! ! !( !( !( ! ! !( !( !( !( Morgan ! ! !( >!( >! > >!(>! >> > >> > > >!( >! >!>> >> > >! >!> >>!> >!>!> >!>!>! >>! !> >!!! !!!>! >> !! >!!!>! ! ! !! !! >!! >! >! ! >!!! ! ! !( !( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( !(!( !(!( !("!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!( LAKE !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(>!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(>!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!(!((!>!(@!(!(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !(!(!(!( !(!( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !(!(!(!(!(!(!( !(!( !( !( > > !(!( > > > > >!>! > > >> >! >! >>! > > > >>> !> >> >>! >>! >!> >! !> >! !> >! !>!>! >> >!!>!! !! ! ! ! ! ! >! >!>!!!! !!!@ ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !!!("

MAY

ADA GREEN

OGDEN

PEORIA

RACINE

HALSTED MORGAN

> > > ABERDEEN

>! ELIZABETH ! !

CARPENTER SANGAMON

UNION RANDOLPH PARK

Data Collected Fall 2019 11 0 175 350 Feet N EXISTING CONDITIONS TRANSPORTATION

Study Area Delivery Sites PD Location Proposed Opportunity Site Eisting Conditions

UP- N, UP-NW

89:LMNO Traffic Signal

i i

Divvy Station

Bicycle Facility i

Alley Entrance i Driveway i Loading one 04 Grand No Parking " Parking

Standing one

MAY

GREEN

HALSTED RACINE

MORGAN

CARPENTER ABERDEEN ELIZABETH

PEORIA SANGAMON 89:LMNO HUBBARD

UP- W

KINZIE i

Milw-N, Milw-W, NCS i

CARROLL

WAYMAN

i i

89:LMNO FULTON

Morgan

i LAKE i " 89:LMNO 89:LMNO" 89:LMNO

MAY

ADA GREEN

OGDEN

PEORIA

RACINE

HALSTED

MORGAN

ABERDEEN ELIZABETH

CARPENTER i SANGAMON

UNION i RANDOLPH

PARK i

i i Data Collected Fall 2019 12 0 175 350 Feet N EXISTING OPPORTUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE CONDITIONS + SITES = PRIORITIES

13 OPPORTUNITY SITES EXISTING LAND USE

Study Area

Eisting Conditions Hospitality (8) Industrial (39) Mixed-Use (32) Office (69) Residential (28) UP- N, UP-NW Under Construction (46)

04 Grand

MAY

GREEN

HALSTED RACINE

MORGAN

CARPENTER ABERDEEN ELIZABETH

PEORIA SANGAMON HUBBARD

UP- W KINZIE

Milw-N, Milw-W, NCS

CARROLL

WAYMAN

FULTON

Morgan " LAKE "

MAY

ADA GREEN

OGDEN

PEORIA

RACINE

HALSTED

MORGAN ABERDEEN

ELIZABETH

CARPENTER SANGAMON

UNION RANDOLPH PARK

Study Developed Fall 2019 14 0 175 350 Feet N OPPORTUNITY SITES EXISTING ZONING

Study Area

Eisting Zoning Business Commercial Manufacturing Planned Development UP- N, UP-NW

04 Grand

MAY

GREEN

HALSTED RACINE

MORGAN

CARPENTER ABERDEEN ELIZABETH

PEORIA SANGAMON HUBBARD

UP- W KINZIE

Milw-N, Milw-W, NCS

CARROLL

WAYMAN

FULTON

Morgan " LAKE "

MAY

ADA GREEN

OGDEN

PEORIA

RACINE

HALSTED

MORGAN ABERDEEN

ELIZABETH

CARPENTER SANGAMON

UNION RANDOLPH PARK

Study Developed Fall 2019 15 0 175 350 Feet N OPPORTUNITY SITES DEVELOPMENT PIPELINE AND OPPORTUNITY SITE ASSESSMENT

Study Area

Development Pipeline Opportunity Sites

Existing Under Construction In Play - Approved

In Play - Proposed UP- N, UP-NW Opportunity Site Surface Parking Vacant

04 Grand

MAY

GREEN

HALSTED RACINE

MORGAN

CARPENTER ABERDEEN ELIZABETH

PEORIA SANGAMON HUBBARD

UP- W KINZIE

Milw-N, Milw-W, NCS

CARROLL

WAYMAN

FULTON

Morgan " LAKE "

MAY

ADA GREEN

OGDEN

PEORIA

RACINE

HALSTED

MORGAN ABERDEEN

ELIZABETH

CARPENTER SANGAMON

UNION RANDOLPH PARK

Study Developed Fall 2019 16 0 175 350 Feet N OPPORTUNITY SITES LANDMARK DESIGNATION WITHIN PROJECT BOUNDARIES

Study Area Parks Fulton-Randolph Market Landmark District

Landmar Buildings Contributing Building Non-Contributing Building UP- N, UP-NW

04 Grand "

FACADE

PRESERVATION MAY

1 GREEN

HALSTED RACINE

MORGAN

CARPENTER ABERDEEN ELIZABETH

PEORIA SANGAMON HUBBARD

UP- W KINZIE

Milw-N, Milw-W, NCS

CARROLL

WAYMAN

FULTON

Morgan " LAKE "

MAY

ADA GREEN

OGDEN

PEORIA

RACINE

HALSTED

MORGAN ABERDEEN

ELIZABETH

CARPENTER SANGAMON

UNION RANDOLPH PARK

Study Developed Fall 2019 17 0 175 350 Feet N OPPORTUNITY SITES CORRIDOR CONDITIONS

KINZIE-HUBBARD CORRIDOR CARROLL AVENUE COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR This portion of the corridor has limited vehicular access due to the elevated tracks and viaducts on the The greatest opportunity for commercial development is along Carroll northern edge, at-grade tracks to the south (with about 200 trains a day), elevated Halsted Street on Avenue. Outside of the two buildings built on the southeast corner of Ogden the east, a dead end with no access to Ogden on the west. North of the elevated tracks is Hubbard

and Carroll (Blue Plate & 1330 W Fulton), there has been no new construction Street which has multiple stop signs and is the border of a low scale residential neighborhoodUP- N, UP-NWUP- N, UP-NW to the along Carroll. However, developers have been positioning for development north. through the purchase of old industrial buildings like ADM and AT&T. Carroll Avenue is also connected directly to Ogden Avenue which allows for efficient KEY COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR ingress and egress to one of the area’s major thoroughfares. The opportunity sites in this area are also “full block” and thus can support more intense Once the City opened the study area to dowtown zoning, developers immediately started to re-zone 04 04 GrandGrand development. Last, and most importantly, development intensities along property through the Planned Development process resulting in approved" " commercial projects on the Carroll are the highest in the corridor with the assumption of a future Metra east and west ends of the corridor as these sites have the best access to CTA transit as well as to major

station. thoroughfares in Halsted Street and Ogden Avenue. While some development has already occurred on

MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY

MAY the western edge, the density at which these developments were built is less than what has been built,

GREEN GREEN GREEN GREEN GREEN GREEN

HALSTED HALSTED HALSTED HALSTED HALSTED HALSTED RACINE RACINE RACINE RACINE RACINE RACINE

MORGAN MORGAN MORGAN MORGAN MORGAN MORGAN

CARPENTER CARPENTER CARPENTER CARPENTER CARPENTER CARPENTER

ABERDEEN ABERDEENABERDEENABERDEENABERDEEN ABERDEEN ELIZABETH ELIZABETH ELIZABETH

PEORIA PEORIA PEORIA

SANGAMON SANGAMON SANGAMON SANGAMON SANGAMON and approved on the eastern edge. SANGAMON HUBBARDHUBBARD SOUTHWEST MIXED-USE COMMERCIAL CORRIDOR

While this pocket of future development is not ProposedProposed 28 28 as intense as those sites in direct proximity to 22 22 24 24 City HallCity Hall UP- WUP- W 8.1 8.1 27 27 the potential future Metra station, development SpecialSpecial Events Events KINZIEKINZIE intensities in the southwestern portion of the 21 21 23 23 25 25 26 26 corridor are intense as these sites are also “full Milw-N,Milw-N, Milw-W, Milw-W, NCS NCS block” sites and have access to Ogden Avenue, 29 29 Lake Street and other CTA stops along lake. 19 19 15 15 ApprovedApproved 18 18 17 17 16 16 12.1 12.1 330 N330 Green N Green 14 14 20 Demolished20 Demolished CARROLLCARROLL StreetStreet 333 North333 North 11.1 11.1 GreenGreen St St Ace Ace ProposedProposed 12.1 12.1 5.75 5.75 HotelHotel310 N310 N 11.5 11.5 1K Fulton1K Fulton WAYMANWAYMAN 1330 West1330 West 30 30 SangamonSangamon 7.1 7.1 800 West800 West FultonFulton 8.1 8.1 FultonFulton HISTORIC DISTRICT 5.0 5.0 Blue PlateBlue Plate 13 13 11.5 11.5 FULTONFutureFULTON development within RevelRevel 5.0 5.0 8.1 8.1 4.3 4.3 811 W811 W and adjacent to the Fulton- West WestEnd End 10 10 3 3 4 4 9 9 SpecialSpecial 11 11 FultonFulton on Fultonon Fulton EventsEvents 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.0 Randolph Market Landmark 8.1 8.1 5.0 5.0 District will need to comply with 5 5 6 6 7 78 8 210 N210 Carpenter N Carpenter HoxtonHoxton ProposedProposedadopted design guidelines. 1 1 2 2 MorganMorgan 12 12 11.5 11.5 7.0 7.0 " " HotelHotel LAKEAdditionally,LAKE the sites that " " remain “developable” within

the district are04 smaller04 than full

MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY MAY

ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA ADA

GREEN GREEN GREEN GREEN GREEN Study Area GREEN

OGDEN OGDEN

PEORIA PEORIA PEORIA PEORIA PEORIA PEORIA

RACINE RACINE RACINE RACINE RACINE

RACINE block sites elsewhere within the

HALSTED HALSTED HALSTED HALSTED HALSTED

Fulton-Randolph Market Landmark District HALSTED

MORGAN MORGAN MORGAN MORGAN MORGAN MORGAN

ABERDEEN ABERDEENABERDEENABERDEENABERDEEN ABERDEEN ELIZABETH

ELIZABETH ELIZABETH Kinzie Corridor.

CARPENTER CARPENTER CARPENTER CARPENTER CARPENTER CARPENTER

SANGAMON SANGAMON SANGAMON SANGAMON SANGAMON Opportunity Sites SANGAMON Recently Delivered UNIONUNION RANDOLPHRANDOLPH U/C or Approved PARKPARK Proposed Opportunity Site

Study Developed Fall 2019 18 0 175 350 Feet N OPPORTUNITY SITES POTENTIAL OPPORTUNITY SITES 100,000 90,000 80,000 Study Area Total80,000 Jobs, Kinzie Study Area Fulton-Randolph Market Landmark District 70,000 Opportunity Sites 60,000 60,000 Recently Delivered U/C or Approved 50,000 Proposed 40,000 35,000 Opportunity Site 30,000 UP- N, UP-NW 20,000 20,000 10,000 10,000 7,000 0 Existing UnderUnder ApprovedApproved ProposedProposed OpportunityScenario A Scenario B 04 ConstructionConstructionGrand Sites(<12 FAR) (>12 FAR)

MAY

GREEN

HALSTED RACINE

MORGAN

CARPENTER ABERDEEN ELIZABETH

PEORIA SANGAMON HUBBARD

Proposed 28 City Hall UP- W 22 8.1 24 27 Special Events KINZIE

21 23 25 26 Milw-N, Milw-W, NCS 29

19 15 Approved 18 17 16 12.1 330 N Green 14 20 Demolished CARROLL Street 333 North 11.1 Green St Ace Proposed 12.1 5.75 Hotel 310 N 11.5 1K Fulton WAYMAN 1330 West 30 Sangamon 7.1 800 West Fulton 8.1 Fulton 5.0 Blue Plate 13 11.5 FULTON

Revel 5.0 8.1 4.3 811 W West End 10 3 4 9 Special 11 Fulton on Fulton Events 4.5 4.0 8.1 5.0 6 Hoxton Proposed 1 2 5 7 8 210 N Carpenter Morgan 12 7.0 " Hotel 11.5 LAKE "

MAY

ADA GREEN

OGDEN

PEORIA

RACINE

HALSTED

MORGAN ABERDEEN

ELIZABETH

CARPENTER SANGAMON

UNION RANDOLPH PARK

Study Developed Fall 2019 19 0 175 350 Feet N EXISTING OPPORTUNITY INFRASTRUCTURE CONDITIONS + SITES = PRIORITIES

20 INFRASTRUCTURE PRIORITIES POTENTIAL STREET TYPES HIERARCHY AND DISTRIBUTION PARK NO. 511 Note: CDOT may required additional study for potential improvements which Ohio BICKERDIKE 04 will be dependent on availability of 01 (GEORGE) ¦¨§ SQUARE funding resources. CONNECTOR Main roads; may have median; UP-N, UP-NW connects between urban centers; may be commercial

Grand Grand " 02 Potential Pedestrian Corridor MAIN STREET Serves mostly local traffic; connects neighborhoods and commercial areas; may be commercial Hubbard

UP-W 03

POTENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD Kinzie Almost all local traffic; serve residential areas; no centerline or lane striping required METRA STATION Milw-N, Milw-W, NCS Potential Street Closure 04 FLEX STREET Specific to Fulton Market, Carroll accommodates ROW use (parking and loading) while improving public safety Noble 05 Fulton SERVICE WAY Narrow roadway; no sidewalks; provides a short service link between two streets Ashland Ashland Lake Morgan Bishop " Armour " NOTE: PROPOSED HIERARCHY IS BASED ON " FINAL DEVELOPMENT SCENARIO. "

DEFINITIONS DESCRIBED BY CDOT / CDOT COMPLETE STREETS CHICAGO 2013.

Study Area Randolph ¦¨§04 UNION Ogden Opportunity Site PARK

CTA Half-Mile Radius

CTA Stations

Open Space

Washington Ada Elizabeth Racine May Aberdeen Carpenter Morgan Peoria Green Halsted Study Developed Fall 2019 21 0 175 350 Feet N INFRASTRUCTURE PRIOIRITES INFRASTRUCTURE POTENTIAL SHORT- / LONG-TERM PROJECTS

Study Area Delivery Sites Note: CDOT may required additional PD Location study for potential improvements which Proposed will be dependent on availability of Opportunity Site funding resources. Short Term Improvements !R! ADA Corner Upgrade P N PN Continental Crosswalk Sidewalk Network ") Lighting Pole Upgrade ^ At-Grade Crossing Improvement XW Viaduct Improvement #* Cul-de-sac 04 Grand Long Term Improvements " Sidewalk Widening Streetscape Improvement

Improved lighting near L Tracks

MAY

GREEN

HALSTED RACINE

MORGAN

CARPENTER ABERDEEN ELIZABETH

PEORIA SANGAMON ! ! ! ") ") !R ") !R ! !R ! !R! ! @ !R !R !R !R @ ") ") @ @ ") !R !R ") ") ") ") HUBBARD ! @ @ !R! @ !R ") ") @ ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") XW XW XW") XW XW") XW XW XW") ") ") ")XW ") ") ") !R! ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") !R! ") ") XW ") ")

! ") ") ") ") ") !R ") ") ") ") P !R! ") ") ") ") ") !") ") XW !R@ KINZIE !R! !R! @ ") ") !R! ") ") ^ ^ MN M NCS ") ") ") ") ^ ^ ^ ") @ ") ") ") ") !R! ") @ ") ") ") ^ ")

@ ") @ @ ") ") *# ") @ @ ") ") ")@ ") ") @ !R")! @ @ !R! @ ") @ ") ") !R! !R! !R! ") ") ") CARROLL @ @ ! ") ") @ ") !R @ @ ") @ @ ") ! @ @ !R!@ ") !R @ ") ") ") @ @ ") ") ") ")@ ") ")@ ") WAYMAN ") ") @ ") @ @ ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")FULTON ") ") ") ") ") ")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") !R!") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") Morgan ") ") ") ") !R!! ") ") ") "") !R!R! !R LAKE @ ! ! !R!R! !R!R @ ") "")

MAY

ADA GREEN

OGDEN

PEORIA

RACINE

HALSTED

MORGAN ABERDEEN

ELIZABETH

CARPENTER SANGAMON

NION RANDOLPH PAR

Study Developed Fall 2019 22 0 175 350 Feet N INFRASTRUCTURE PRIORITIES TRANSPORTATION POTENTIAL SHORT- / LONG-TERM PROJECTS

Study Area Delivery Sites PD Location Proposed Opportunity Site

Eisting Conditions

89:LMNO Traffic Signal P N PN

Bicycle Facility i i

i Divvy Station i Corridor Streetscape Study, remove

Short Term Improvements westernmost roadway portion of Racine

i I- Wayfinding Signage from Kinzie to the north point of the existing i 89:LMNO Traffic Signal !"$ island. Island could be extended west to

Stop Sign 04 Grand

i TNC one meet existing western sidewalk and create I- i " Divvy Station additional pedestrian space. All vehicular

Bicycle Facility trafic would utilize the soft “s”-curve

Long Term Improvements

i i alignmentMAY of Racine.

Divvy Station

GREEN

HALSTED RACINE

! MORGAN

CARPENTER ABERDEEN ! ELIZABETH

R PEORIA

TNC one SANGAMON HUBBARD Bicycle Facility !

89:LMNO !

! 89:LMNO

! !

Property Acquisition ! !

! !

! ! !

! !

P ! !

! !

! (!

! ! !

i ( ( KINZIE

i ! ! !! ! !i ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! $ $ !

! !" !"

! ! i

! i

! !

MN M NCS !

i ! i

i ! !

i !

! !(

i !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

!"$! !"$ ! CARROLL

! i ! ! ! ! ! !

!R! ! R!! i

! !

! !R

! !

! WAYMAN

! !

i ! !

! R!

i !

! !

!( ! (! (! ! (! ! (!

!!!!!!!!!!!

! ! FULTON i !

! i 89:LMNO

! ! i

! i

! Morgan

! ! !(

!R !( i !

! i " LAKE

! 89:LMNO

i 89:LMNO 89:LMNO i 89:LMNO i i 89:LMNO " !R! (! (!

(! 04

MAY

ADA GREEN

OGDEN

PEORIA

RACINE

HALSTED

MORGAN

ABERDEEN ELIZABETH i

CARPENTER i SANGAMON

Note: CDOT may required additional

NION i i RANDOLPH

PAR study for potential improvements which

will be dependent on availability of

i funding resources. i Study Developed Fall 2019 23 0 175 350 Feet N INFRASTRUCTURE PRIORITIES ESTIMATED WATER USAGE (W/ EXISTING WATER PIPE SIZES)

Study Area Delivery Sites PD Location Based on informal/preliminary conversations with DWM staff during review of this projected water usage Proposed plan, DWM had indicated that there would likely be sufficient hydraulic capacity of the water feeder Opportunity Site mains in the vicinity of the Kinzie Corridor to supply water to this general area. However, there would likely Existing Water Line need to be localized upsizing of water infrastructure to accommodate the projected demands. DWM 100 gph Potential Water Use of PD/Proposed P N PN (gph during active hours) staff would need to model specific developer water demand data to provide more definitive results and 100 gph Potential Water Usage of Opportunity Site (gph during active hours)* to determine the extent of upgrades, typically the cost responsibility of the developer.

T 2012 C B E C S CBECS / / 04 Grand " 12

MAY

GREEN

HALSTED RACINE

MORGAN

CARPENTER ABERDEEN ELIZABETH

PEORIA SANGAMON 6 HUBBARD 12 8 8

8 8

8 12 105 8 (!28 (!22 (!2 (!27 gp P 2,370 gp 8 1,920 gp 540 KINZIE 12 gp (!23 (!25 (!21 (!26 1,015 gp 1,190 gp 1,435 gp 1,540 gp MN M NCS 1,260 gp 7,895 gp (!2

8 (!17 (!16 (!15 (!1 10,700 gp (!18 4,990 gp 2,200 gp 2,570 gp 4,930 gp 1,060 (!1 (!20 12 230 gp 8 30 CARROLLgp 7,370 gp 70 gp 12

12 580 1,825 6 gp gp WAYMAN 1,565 (!30 8 12 gp (!13 9,600 gp 5,680 gp 645

8 gp FULTON

8 8 12 8

8 8 8 8 1,690 12 (!10 (!11 4,030 (! (! 335 8 90 gp 8 gp 8 960 6,350 (!3 4,630 gp gp 2,540 775 2,615 gp gp gp gp gp 12 12 (!5 (!6 (!7 (!8 (!1 5,500 (!12 915 1,790 (!2 1,740 1,910 1,130 155 gp 1,490 3,175 Morgan gp gp gp 1,520 gp gp gp gp " 150 LAKE 12 " gp

MAY

ADA GREEN

OGDEN

PEORIA

RACINE

HALSTED

MORGAN ABERDEEN

ELIZABETH

CARPENTER SANGAMON

NION RANDOLPH PAR

Study Developed Fall 2019 24 0 175 350 Feet N INFRASTRUCTURE PRIORITIES ESTIMATED WATER USAGE (W/ EXISTING SEWER PIPE SIZES)

Study Area Delivery Sites Based on informal/preliminary conversations with DWM Sewer Section staff during review of this projected water usage plan, DWM PD Location Proposed indicated that there would likely be sufficient hydraulic capacity of the trunk sewers in the Kinzie Corridor vicinity to collect dry weather Opportunity Site flow volume.

Existing Sewer Line 100 gph Potential Water Use of PD/Proposed Based on projected water usage data, DWM performed a hydraulic analysis utilizing the Citywide Sewer System ModelP N to PN identify locations (gph during active hours) 100 gph Potential Water Usage of Opportunity Site where sewer upgrades would be required to accommodate this development scenario. From the hydraulic analysis, DWM and their (gph during active hours)* modeler will provide general information that identifies which localized sewers within the Kinzie Corridor will need to be replaced and/ T 2012 C or upsized. However, the actual upsizing and sewer replacement requirements are pending site specific information provided by the B E C S CBECS / developers (e.g. release rates).The additional hydraulic modeling needed to identify the specific improvements will be modeled in detail / 04 Grand in the future and was not done as part of this initial evaluation. " 12

MAY

GREEN

HALSTED RACINE

MORGAN

CARPENTER ABERDEEN ELIZABETH

PEORIA SANGAMON HUBBARD 12 72 12 12

12 2

2 105 2 (!28

2 (!22 2 gp 2 (!2 (!27 P 2,370 gp 2 1,920 gp 540 KINZIE 5 gp 12 (!23 (!25 (!21 (!26 1,015 gp 1,190 gp 1,435 gp 1,540 gp MN M NCS 1,260 gp 7,895 gp (!2

(! (!15 1,060 12 (!17 16 (!1 10,700 gp (!18 4,990 gp gp

2,200 gp 2,570 gp 4,930 gp 0 12

12 12 (!1 2 (!20 12 15 CARROLL 7,370 gp 230 gp 10 70 gp 12 580 1,825 12 gp 1,565 (!30 gp WAYMAN gp 2 (!13 9,600 gp 5,680 gp 645

2 gp FULTON

5 2 0

2 2

2 1,690 (!10 2 (!11 4,030 (! (! 335 90 gp 960 gp 10 6,350 (!3 4,630 gp gp 2,540 775 2,615 gp gp

gp gp gp 5 (!5 (!6 (!7 (!8 (!1 5,500 (!12 915 1,790 (!2 1,740 1,910 1,130 155 gp 1,490 3,175 Morgan gp gp gp 1,520 gp gp gp gp " 150 LAKE 12 " gp

MAY

ADA GREEN

OGDEN

PEORIA

RACINE

HALSTED

MORGAN ABERDEEN

ELIZABETH

CARPENTER SANGAMON

NION RANDOLPH PAR

Study Developed Fall 2019 25 0 175 350 Feet N INFRASTRUCTURE PRIORITIES POWER - ELECTRICAL SUMMARY

POWER:

• ComEd will evaluate required utility upgrades on a development by development basis because they are regulated by the ICC to provide electrical service to customers at no upfront cost. ComEd recoups their infrastructure investments through a prescribed formula by the ICC

• Most of physical infrastructure required for the developments will be located on the customer side of the meter, and the individual developers will be required for their own procurement and design

LIGHTING:

EXISTING LIGHTING CONDITIONS PROPOSED FUTURE CONDITIONS HPS to LED luminaire upgrade No change

Aluminum w/LED - Kinzie & Fulton Upgrade to aluminum w/LED* & buried power lines Steel poles w/LED or HPS & aerial Focus installation on “streetscape” power lines corridors

Ornamental lighting Underpass lighting – upgrade to LED; Coordination w/Metra & CTA Underpass lighting – HPS Install lighting on both sides of the street w/elements to improve lighting for pedestrians & create feeling of safe environment Lighting located on only one side of Upgrading of HPS to LED should offset the street any power needs for additional lighting; City to coordinate lightpole upgrades with Ameresco luminaire improvement schedule

26 NEXT STEPS

WHAT’S NEXT? The Chicago Department of Planning and Development and the Chicago Department of Transportation have taken the information provided in this infrastructure study and have already begun addressing select short term priorities, as described further below. Some of the other priorities identified in the study will take further analysis and will also be based on allocation of available funding resources.

UTILITY COORDINATION AND REVIEW To ensure earlier coordination of underground utilities and services, applicants for projects within this study area will be encouraged to submit 30% plans submission for review with CDOT’s Office of Underground Coordination (OUC). With the earlier review, the utility service groups will provide responses to applicants in the design phase for the project. For more information about CDOT’s OUC, please visit the following site: https://www.chicago.gov/city/en/ depts/cdot/provdrs/construction_information/svcs/office_of_undergroundcoordination.html

AT-GRADE METRA CROSSING IMPROVEMENTS The infrastructure study identified the need to improve the six at-grade Metra crossings at the following street locations: Green, Morgan, Carpenter, Ab- erdeen, May, and Racine. Over 200 trains traverse these crossings each weekday, and pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular traffic is increasing as this area transitions from manufacturing to commercial and mixed-use. CDOT, DPD, and Metra are meeting regularly to coordinate for these at-grade crossing improvements. Recently approved Planned Development projects have required adjacent development parcels to provide a monetary developer contribution to help fund the necessary improvements. CDOT and DPD are also pursuing up to S850,000 in Kinzie TIF funds to fund the design and phase 1 engineering of the crossing improvements.

CDOT INITIATIVES CDOT is currently in the final design and engineering phase for Lake Street improvements from Ashland to Halsted. The work is expected to begin in 2021 and will include alignment of the curb to the face of the CTA columns, replacement of sidewalks, pedestrian bumpouts, ADA improvements, and new trees. Street lighting improvements will also be provided. DPDCHI CDOT has also procured consultant services to study the proposed location, feasibility, and potential funding sources for a new Metra station to serve this area. The construction and timing of a new Metra infill station is dependent on an extensive Metra track capacity expansion and realignment project in this corridor, the design of which is being studied concurrently

WEST LOOP ONLINE RESOURCE To better guide the development of the West Loop, DPD has gathered relevant maps, plans and guidelines, legislative information, and other resources in one place for easier access. These documents are being used when DPD reviews proposed projects, therefore applicants will need to utilize these resources and reference/cite the relevant aspects of the documents. Each resource is summarized for its purpose, a map of the area it encompasses, the public outreach that informed its adoption, and a link to the document. This webpage (chicago.gov/westloop) also has information on latest updates on City initiatives impacting this community.

27 APPENDIX MARKET DEMAND

Since 1970, Chicago’s Expanded Central Area has seen ~11 acres of land absorbed each year for new development purposes with ~35% of that land used for commercial office development, on average. As of Q4 2019, there were approximately 146 acres of “developable” land left within Chicago’s Central Area – this land includes surface parking lots and vacant lots; however, only 5.7 acres of developable land was left in the Core Loop with a majority (61.8 acres) available in the South Loop and 11.5 acres available in the Kinzie sub-market.

The Core Loop and Near North Side have historically been the most sought after Central Area sub-markets for new development as they offer an already existent critical mass of employees and residents and are serviced by all CTA “L” lines.

However, “easily developable” land is increasingly scarce within the Core Loop and Near North Side which has resulted in increased costs to construct and subsequent development through- out other Central Area sub-markets, like the West Loop and the Kinzie Corridor. To this point, development within the Core Loop and Near North Side accounted for 92% of all Central Area office development in the 1970s, but these two sub markets accounted for only 10% of all Cen- tral Area office development in the 2010s. Contrarily, the West Loop and the Kinzie Corridor accounted for 0% of all Central Area office development in the 1970s, but in the 2010s these two sub-markets accounted for 70% of all Central Area office development.

This shift in development is a desire for Class A office space which is viewed as a “must” by em- ployers if they intend to attract the next generation of workers. Commercial buildings in the Core Loop and Near North Side do not boast large enough floorplates and the modern amenities desired to attract today’s workforce and the cost to demolish/renovate an obsolete high rise and replace it within the Core Loop or Near North Side is such that developers have targeted other sub-markets with “easily developable” land and improving access to transit. This has made the Kinzie Corridor such an attractive location for new commercial office development since the turn of the century when the City of Chicago expanded where it would allow DX zoning. Addi- tionally, these factors have resulted in a “character shift” downtown as obsolete commercial buildings within the Core Loop and Near North Side are increasingly being converted to hotel and residential use.

According to JLL as of Q1 2020, the Fulton Market sub-market had 4.8 million SF of office inventory with more than 2 million SF under construction and was fetching the highest rents in the Chicago metro at ~$57 a sf. The Core Loop has an inventory of 149 million SF with 5.9 million SF under construction and rents achieving ~$45 per SF Additionally, ~2.8 million SF of office space is currently under construction in the West Loop.

SHIFTING OFFICE MARKET - CENTRAL CONCENTRATION OF ALL NEW OFFICE INVENTORY DELIVERED BY DECADE

For 50 years the average center point of new office supply in Chicago has stayed within the Loop. As easily developable land has become scarce, new development has moved outward. In the 2000s most development was across the river in River North. But since 2010 development has moved rapidly west. When reviewing future proposed projects, the vast majority are in the Fulton Market District and West Loop.

28 APPENDIX MARKET DEMAND

When considering the share of land absorbed by decade in each of the sub-markets of Chica- go’s Central Area, The Loop and Near North Side have consistently declined.

Specifically filtering for only office development, West Loop has seen a slow steady increase in Note: These areas do not represent Community Areas the share of overall development. Fulton Market has shifted rapidly from almost no development before 2010, to almost half of all development.

29 APPENDIX INFRASTRUCTURE POTENTIAL SHORT- / LONG-TERM PROJECTS DETAIL

Kinzie IC Infrastructure Projects & Capital Costs - DRAFT (1/09/2020) Short Term Improvements (<2 ear Implementa on Timeframe) Long Term Improvements (>2 ear Implementa�on Timeframe) • Infrastructure highlights include continental Short Term Improvements (<2 year implementation) Sewer Main Water Main Long Term Improvements (>2 year implementation) Sewer Main Water Main crosswalk, ADA corner upgrade, at-grade crossing Con nental At-Grade Crossing TrafficComplete Ligh ng Pole Replacement Replacement Under-track Sidewalk Divvy Continental At-Grade Crossing Sidewalk Lighting Pole CorridorDivvy Station ADA CornerNew Traffic Upgrade Viaduct 2 Wayfinding 3 Corridor Replacement Replacement BuryUnder-track U�li�es Sidewalk Streetscape Property Bicycle New Traffic Corridor ADA Corner Upgrade 2 3 5 Bicycle Facilities TNC Zones ControlSidewalk Other Corridor Bury Utilities Station improvement,TNC Zones sidewalk network and lighting pole Crosswalks Improvement Network Upgrades Location Crosswalks Signal ImprovementImprovements Signage Upgrades (Capacity(Capa city (Capacity (Capacity lighting Wideningligh�ng ImprovementWideningAcquisition Facilities Signal Signage Location Network Increase)Increase) Increase) Increase) upgrade; long-term projects include burying utilities, Each Each At-grade Each side of Each Each Each Each side of Each side of street Each block of Each block undertrackEach lighting, sidewalk widening and sewer/ Unit intersection Each Corner Each pole Each station Each block 7 EachEach At-grade viaduct EachEach sign side of Each sign - Unit size & length size & length EEachach block side of of street Each sideEach of locationstreet Each station Each sign crossing street per block Unit intersec on Eachintersection Corner location Each pole Unit size & length size &street length per block Eachper bloc blockk of streestreett of street intersection leg crossing street per block street per block per block water main replacement discussed separately 0, 1 leg (see specific 0, 1 Unit Cost $1,200 $15,000 $1,000,000 $140,000 $20,000 $56,000 $30,000 $350,000 $800 $55,000 - $140,000 $500 $500 Unit Cost TBD TBD $200,000 $150,000 $145,000 $1,500,000 $4,000,000 $56,000 $30,000 $350,000 $800 $15,000- typical description) 0, 1 0, 1 2 Unit Cost $1,200 $30,0001 @ Halsted- non -typical $1,000,000 $25,000 $12,000 Unit Cost DPD/DWMTBD DPD/DWM TBD n/a $150,000 $80,000 Hubbard 5 5 - 10 32 ------Hubbard ------• @Long-term Green St. - focused on locations not adjacent St. Coordination Coordination @ Racine St. DPD/DWM DPD/DWM to developments that are under construction or $6,000 $75,000 - $1,400,000 $640,000 Hubbard- 8 - 4$350,000 typical, - - - - 8 - 34 - Hubbard - 2 ------$700,000 - 3 @Sangamon Coordina�on Coordina�on approved 2 Dedicated bike lane1 non- typical @May (1 stop sign) Kinzie 1 1 - 1 - @ Aberdeen St. & (Green to Des - - - - Kinzie ------$9,600 $90,000 @Morgan - @Peoria$200,000 (2 $408,000 - - - @Green St. Plaines) - 3 blocks @Green stop signs) • Short-term focused on areas where development 8 $1,200 $15,000 - $140,000 - $112,000 $90,000 - $2,400 - $1,500 ------*Parked already exists and long-term focused near 9 @Ada (2 Corridor 3 Carroll 9 4 typical, - vehicles are 13 Carroll 4 - - Protected *Parked stop signs) Improvement @Ada St. opportunity2 sites 1 non- typical @ Ada for Carroll cycle track Carroll 10 5 - vehicles are 17 - - - - - @Elizabethover sidewalk - Planning Study4 Carroll - - - 7 @Racine St. - @Elizabeth re-alignment (one side of over sidewalk (2 stop (Proposed EB; @Morgan & @May St space street) space signs) couple w/Fulton) St. SUGGESTED PRIORITIZATION: $12,000 75000 - $1,260,000 $340,000 - $10,800- $90,000- - - - $$2,000200,000 - $156,000$200,000 - - - - - $13,500,000 - $4,000,000 $168,000 $270,000 - $1,600

• Improvements2 @Peoria that do not require coordination with Wayman 2 - - 2 2 Ogden1 @Peoria St. 3 - 5 typical,------31 - WaymanOgden ------St. & 1 non- typical external@Green agencies St. or external approvals

$2,400 - - 280000 40000 $56,000 $3,600- $105,000------$372,000------$1,600 5 • Improvements that are focused on safety (at-grade @Ada St @Racine crossings) or sense of safety (lighting) Fulton 1 @ Aberdeen St. Fulton @Aberdeen Racine 1 - @Morgan 1 - 12 Racine 5 - 1 @Green • Improvements that support planned developments $56,000 $4,000 or opportunity sites 5 3 2 @Morgan Ashland CTA 2 @Halsted St. $1,200 @ Green- St. @Racine $1,000,000 - $144,000 - - $80,000 1 Lake 1 4 - - 0 - - - Station (1 sign at - Lake - 11 - - - - - POTENTIAL @AdaFUNDING SOURCES: @ Racine St. @Aberdeen @Aberdeen @ Racine St. each CTA exit) @ Elizabeth @Ada St. St. @Peoria @Green Public $1,200 $60,000 - - $0 $168,000 - $700,000 $4,000 - - $1,500 - Note:- CDOT$1,650,000 may required- additional- - - - $350,000 $800 • TIF funding (expires end of 2022) Dedicated bike lane 2 viaduct: (Art, study for potential improvements which Ogden 3 7 - - 27 - extension (Fulton - - - - - Ogden ------1 - lighting) • Grants to Carroll) - 1 block will be dependent on availability of • Other City or federal funds $3,600 $105,000 - - $540,000 - $30,000 - - $110,000 - - - funding- resources.------$350,000 - Ada 3 - - - 9 ------Ada ------• - Local- Funds from the Neighborhood Opportunity $3,600 - - - $180,000 ------1 viaduct: (Art, Fund Bonus Elizabeth 2 - - 0.5 5 - - - - lighting, pier crash - - - Elizabeth - - 1.5 ------protection) $2,400 - - $70,000 $100,000 - - - - $105,000 - - - - - $217,500 - - - - Private- - Corridor Streetscape Study, • Developer / fee Protected 1 viaduct: (Art, close off Racine 4 (Similar to Racine 1 - 1 - 8 ------Racine - - 1 - - bike lanes • 5 Public-Private- Partnership lighting) from Kinzie to Kinzie cost) (4 blocks) midblock Hubbard4 $1,200 - $1,000,000 - $160,000 - - - - $55,000 - - 100000 - - - $6,000,000 - - $120,000 $1,750,000 - 1 1 viaduct: (Art, *Parked lighting, pier crash May 2 - 1 Vehicles are 10 ------May ------protection, over sidewalk landscaping) space 1 $2,400 - $1,000,000 $140,000 $200,000 - - - - $140,000 - - - - - $145,000 ------1 viaduct: (Art, Aberdeen 3 - 1 0.5 9 - - - - lighting, pier crash - - - Aberdeen - - 0.5 ------protection) $3,600 - $1,000,000 $70,000 $180,000 - - - - $105,000 - - - - - $72,500 - - - - - 30 APPENDIX TRANSPORTATION POTENTIAL SHORT- / LONG-TERM PROJECTS DETAIL

Kinzie IC Infrastructure Projects & Capital Costs - DRAFT (1/09/2020) Short Term Improvements (<2 ear Implementa�on) Long Term Improvements (>2 ear Implementa�on Timeframe) • Short-term projects are defined as “<2 year Short Term Improvements (<2 year implementation) Long Term Improvements (>2 year implementation) implementation” and eligible for TIF funding; long- Traffic Divvy Divvy Sta�on New Traffic Viaduct StreetscapeWaySewer fi Mainnding Prop Watererty Main Bicycle New Traffic Traffic Divvy term projects are >2 year implementation period Continental At-Grade Crossing Sidewalk Lighting Pole CoDivvyrridor Station 5 New TrafficBicycle Facili�es Viaduct TNC ZonesWayfinding Control Replacement ReplacementOther Sta�on Under-track Sidewalk TNC Streetscape Zones Property Bicycle New Traffic Corridor ADA Corner Upgrade BicycleLoca Facilities�on TNC Zones Signal Control ImprovemeOthernts CorridorImprovementSignageAcquisi�on Bury Utilities Facili�es Signal Station TNC Zones Crosswalks Improvement2 Network Upgrades3 Location5 Signal Improvements Signage Signage (Capacity (Capacity Loca�on lighting Widening Improvement Acquisition Facilities andSignal require strategic capital planning and potential Signage Location Increase) Increase) developer shared costs Each Each At-grade Each side of Each Each Each side of Each side of street Each block of Each block Each Unit intersection Each Corner Each pole Each station Each block Each viaductEach Each signEach Each sign - UnitEach blocksize of & length size & length EacEachh blockblock of street Each Each location Each station Each sign crossing street per block Unit Each sta�onintersection Eaclocationh block7 Each viaduct Each sign Each signEach loca�on E- achstreet sta� peron block per block Each signstreet of street intersection leg intersec�on loca�on7 street of street intersec�on (see specific • Transportation highlights include Divvy Station Unit Cost0, 1 $1,200 $15,000 $1,000,000 $140,000 $20,000 $56,000 $30,000 $350,000 $800 $55,000 - $140,000 $500 $500 Unit Cost0, 1 TBD TBD $200,000 $45,000 $150,000 - $145,000 $1,500,000 $4,000,000 $56,000 $30,000 $350,000 $800 $125,000description) - 0, 1 (see specific Unit Cost $56,000 $20,000 $350,000 $800 $190,000 $600$1,500,000 $2,000 $4,000,000 $56,000 $80,000 $350,000 $800 location,2 bicycle facility, traffic signal, TNC Zone, 1 @ Halsted DPD/DWM DPD/DWMdesc rip�on) Hubbard 5 5 - 10 32 ------Hubbard ------@ Green St. - St. Coordination Coordination viaduct improvement, traffic control signage and 2 @ Racine St. 1 @ Halsted $6,000 $75,000 - $1,400,000 $640,000 Hubba- rd - - $350,000 ------@ Green St- . - - - - - $700,000wayfinding- signage; long-term projects include St. 3 @Sangamon @ Racine St. 2 Dedicated bike lane sweeping streetscape improvement, property @May (1 stop sign) Kinzie 1 1 - 1 - @ Aberdeen St. & (Green to- Des - - $350,00- 0 - - - - Kinzie------$700,000------@Morgan @Peoria (2 acquisition and additional phasing for Divvy Station, @Green St. Plaines) - 3 blocks @Green stop signs) Corridor 3 @Ada (2 7 Protected TNC Zone, bicycle facility and traffic signal $1,200 $15,000 - $140,000 - $112,000 $90,000 - $2,400 - $1,500 - - Improveme@Adant -St. - - 2 ------stop signs) @ Ada for Carroll cycle track 9 @Ada (2 Corridor 7 @Racine5 St. - @Elizabeth 3 Carroll - - - - - @Elizabeth - Planning Study Protected *Parked stop signs) Improvement re-alignment (one side of @Ada St. • Focused2 on locations not adjacent to developments 4 (2 stop @Morgan & @May St @ Ada for Carroll cycle track Carroll 10 5 - vehicles are 17 - - - - - @Elizabeth - Planning Study Carroll (Proposed EB; - - - 7 @Racine St. - @Elizabeth street) re-alignment (one side of over sidewalk (2 stop (Proposed EB; signs) couple w/FultSt.on) @Morgan that are& @May under St construction or approved street) space signs) couple w/Fulton) St. - - - - - $2,400$13,500,000 - $4,000,000$300,000 $168 ,000 $560,000 - $1,600 $12,000 75000 - $1,260,000 $340,000 - - - - - $2,000 - $200,000 - - - $13,500,000 $4,000,000 $168,000 $270,000• Short-term- $1,600 focused on areas where development Dedicated bike lane 2 viaduct: (Art, already2 @Peoria exists and long-term focused near Wayman 2 - - 2 2 1 Ogden@Peoria St. - - e-xtension (F- ulton to ------Wayman------1 ------St. & ligh�ng, powerwashing) Carroll) - 1 block @ Carroll Ave opportunity@Green St. sites $2,400 - - 280000 40000 $56,000 - - - $20,00- 0 - - - - - $270,000 ------$350,000------$1,600 5 SUGGESTED PRIORITIZATION: @Ada St Corridor @Racine Fulton 1 @ Aberdeen St. Fulton Streetscape Study, @Aberdeen Protected 1 viaduct: (Art, 4 close off Racine • Improvements that do not require coordination with Racine - @Morgan------bike lanes 5 - @Green ligh�ng, powerwashing) from Kinzie to (4 blocks) external agencies or external approvals $56,000 $4,000 midblock 5 5 Hubbard 3 2 @Morgan • Pedestrian improvements (everyone is a pedestrian Ashland CTA $6,000,000 - - $180,000 $1,750,000 - 2 @Halsted St. - @ Green St. @Racine- - - $135,000 - - $250,000 1 Lake 1 4 - - 0 - - - Station (1 sign at - Lake - 11 - - - - - @Ada @ Racine St. @Aberdeen @Aberdeen @for Racine some St. portion of their trip) each CTA exit) @ Elizabeth @Ada St. St. @Peoria @Green • Bicycle improvements (encourage non-motorized $1,200 $60,000 - - $0 $168,000 - $700,000 $4,000 - - $1,500 - Note:- CDOT$1,650,000 may required- additional- - - - $350,000 $800 Dedicated bike lane travel and access to CTA train stations) 2 viaduct: (Art, study for potential improvements which Ogden 3 7 - - 27 - extension (Fulton - - - - - Ogden ------1 - lighting) to Carroll) - 1 block will be dependent on availability of • Vehicular improvements (traffic signals) $3,600 $105,000 - - $540,000 - $30,000 - - $110,000 - - - funding- resources.------$350,000 - Ada 3 - - - 9 ------Ada ------$3,600 - - - $180,000 ------1 viaduct: (Art, POTENTIAL FUNDING SOURCES: Elizabeth 2 - - 0.5 5 - - - - lighting, pier crash - - - Elizabeth - - 1.5 ------protection) $2,400 - - $70,000 $100,000 - - - - $105,000 - - - - - $217,500 - - - - Public- - Corridor Streetscape Study, • TIF funding expires end of 2022 Protected 1 viaduct: (Art, close off Racine 4 (Similar to Racine 1 - 1 - 8 ------Racine - - 1 - - bike lanes 5 - lighting) from Kinzie to Kinzie cost) • Grants (4 blocks) midblock 4 • Other City or federal funds Hubbard • Local funds from the Neighborhood Opportunity $1,200 - $1,000,000 - $160,000 - - - - $55,000 - - 100000 - - - $6,000,000 - - $120,000 $1,750,000 - 1 1 viaduct: (Art, Fund *Parked lighting, pier crash May 2 - 1 Vehicles are 10 ------May ------protection, over sidewalk landscaping) space 1 Private $2,400 - $1,000,000 $140,000 $200,000 - - - - $140,000 - - - - - $145,000 - - - - • - Developer- / fee 1 viaduct: (Art, Aberdeen 3 - 1 0.5 9 - - - - lighting, pier crash - - - Aberdeen - - 0.5 - - - - • - Public-Private- Partnership protection) $3,600 - $1,000,000 $70,000 $180,000 - - - - $105,000 - - - - - $72,500 - - - - - 31