DOCSLIB.ORG

NMR Spectroscopy of Aromatic Compounds (#1E)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NMR Spectroscopy of Aromatic Compounds (#1E) NMR Spectroscopy of Aromatic Compounds (#1e) 1H NMR Spectroscopy of Aromatic Compounds Erich Hückel’s study of aromaticity in the 1930s produced a set of rules for determining whether a compound is aromatic. According to the Hückel criteria, a molecule must be cyclic, nearly planar, possess a p orbital on each carbon, and have 4n + 2 electrons, where n is an integer. These factors allow one to label a molecule as “aromatic,” giving the molecule some special reactive characteristics that will be discussed in detail in your Chemistry 302 lecture. For now, the classic example of an aromatic compound is benzene, seen below with its 1H NMR spectrum. 7.33 benzene 6.00 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 In aromatic compounds like benzene, the protons on the aromatic ring are shifted downfield. For example, the six protons in benzene are magnetically and chemically equivalent and appear at 7.33 ppm. This is farther downfield than alkene protons, which appear between 4.5-6.5 ppm. NMR serves as a useful tool to determine whether a compound is aromatic. For example, the protons in cyclooctatetraene (C8H8), which is shown below, appear at 5.78 ppm indicating it is in the typical alkene region, not the aromatic region near 7 ppm. 5.78 cyclooctatetraene 0.00 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 -0.5 37 If a hydrogen atom on the benzene ring is replaced with a different substituent, such as a methyl group, some of the hydrogens become magnetically inequivalent. For example, in the compound toluene, there are three different kinds of hydrogens on the benzene ring. The hydrogens neighboring the methyl (Ha) are magnetically inequivalent to the hydrogens two carbons away from the methyl (Hb) and the hydrogen directly across the ring from the methyl group (Hc). Ha, Hb, and Hc all couple to each other and have J values that correlate with the number of bonds between coupling protons. Ha and Hb are ortho to one another (adjacent); Jortho = 6-10 Hz. Ha and Hc are meta to one another (two carbons apart); Jmeta = 1-3 Hz. Although there is not an example in this molecule, if two protons are three carbons apart, they are para; Jpara = 0-1 Hz. As you can see, the J value decreases as the number of bonds between hydrogens increases. The peak for the aromatic protons is a complex multiplet as a result of the many J values and overlapping peaks. With greater resolution, it is possible to see these separate peaks. Ha Hb CH3 Ha Hc Hb toluene 7.25 7.20 7.15 7.10 5.00 3.00 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 If the monosubstituted benzene contains an electron-withdrawing group such as Br or Cl, the protons adjacent to the electron-withdrawing group will be shifted slightly downfield of the other aromatics, producing separate peaks. The NMR of bromobenzene is shown below. Notice the peaks that are shifted downfield (7.4-7.5 ppm). These Ha couple to Hb (Jortho = 6-10 Hz) which results in a doublet. The doublet is further split by coupling to Hc with a very small J value (Jpara ~ 0-1 Hz). 38 Br Ha Ha Hb Hb Hc 7.55 7.50 7.45 7.40 7.35 7.30 7.25 7.20 7.15 2.00 3.14 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 -0.5 For disubstituted benzenes, the aromatic peaks are often separated as with bromobenzene. There are a few exceptions. For instance, the compound para-dimethylbenzene will have only a singlet in the aromatic region because all of the hydrogens are magnetically equivalent due to the symmetry in the molecule. This will be true of any para-disubstituted benzene having two identical substituents. However, ortho-dimethylbenzene will have separated aromatic peaks. An important splitting pattern that identifies a specific type of substituted benzene is that of a para-disubstituted benzene having two substituents with different electron-withdrawing effects. An example is shown below with para-bromoethylbenzene. The distinctive pattern is the pair of doublets, which can be widely spaced or close together depending on the groups on the ring. This pair of doublets is only seen with a para-disubstituted benzene, not ortho- or meta- disubstituted benzenes. The latter display much more complex patterns. Ha Hb CH3 Br Ha Hb 0.00 8.0 7.9 7.8 7.7 7.6 7.5 7.4 7.3 7.2 7.1 7.0 6.9 6.8 6.7 6.6 6.5 1.99 1.94 2.00 2.95 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 39 13C NMR Spectroscopy of Aromatic Compounds As with other 13C NMR spectra, aromatic compounds display single lines for each unique carbon environment in a benzene ring. Aromatic carbons appear between 120-170 ppm. The 13C NMR spectra of bromobenzene and p-bromoethylbenzene are shown below for comparison. There are four different carbon environments in bromobenzene, and four different peaks. Similarly, for p- bromoethylbenzene, four environments appear but the pattern of the peaks is quite different and more separated. Note that one of the carbons appears much farther downfield at 143 ppm. 131.49 Cb Br 129.97 Cc Ca 126.81 Cd Cb Cc 122.49 200 150 100 50 0 131.28129.58 Cb Cc Ca CH3 Cd Cb Cc Br 15.45 28.32 0.00 119.24 143.07 200 150 100 50 0 40 DEPT spectra can also be obtained for aromatics; as with earlier examples, CH’s appear as upright singlets in the DEPT-90 and DEPT-135. Quaternary carbons appear in the proton decoupled spectra but not in DEPT spectra. Postlab You should complete the following assignment in your lab notebook along with the other spectroscopy assignments. A table of 1H chemical shifts is located on page 44. Solvent peaks typically appear at 0 ppm or 7.24 ppm. A printable copy of this assignment can be found at www.unm.edu/~orgchem. 1. How many separate peaks would be observed in the 13C spectra of the following compounds? a. 1,2-dinitrobenzene b. 1,3-dinitrobenzene c. 1,4-dinitrobenzene 2. Propose structures for the compounds that would be expected to generate the following 1H NMR spectra. Calculate the degree of unsaturation of each compound and assign the protons to their respective peaks. A. 1.29 C10H13Br 7.38 7.25 7.40 7.35 7.30 7.25 1.78 1.89 9.00 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 41 B. C9H12 1.30 1.29 1.28 1.27 1.26 1.25 1.24 1.23 1.22 1.21 1.20 7.35 7.30 7.25 7.20 7.15 2.98 2.97 2.96 2.95 2.94 2.93 2.92 2.91 2.90 2.89 2.88 2.87 2.86 2.85 2.84 2.83 2.82 2.81 2.80 5.10 1.03 6.00 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 C. C6H4BrCl 7.60 7.55 7.50 7.45 7.40 7.35 7.30 7.25 7.20 7.15 7.10 7.05 7.00 2.00 2.03 8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 42 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Review of Market for Octane Enhancers
    May 2000 • NREL/SR-580-28193 Review of Market for Octane Enhancers Final Report J.E. Sinor Consultants, Inc. Niwot, Colorado National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 NREL is a U.S. Department of Energy Laboratory Operated by Midwest Research Institute • Battelle • Bechtel Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 May 2000 • NREL/SR-580-28193 Review of Market for Octane Enhancers Final Report J.E. Sinor Consultants, Inc. Niwot, Colorado NREL Technical Monitor: K. Ibsen Prepared under Subcontract No. TXE-0-29113-01 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 NREL is a U.S. Department of Energy Laboratory Operated by Midwest Research Institute • Battelle • Bechtel Contract No. DE-AC36-99-GO10337 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof. Available electronically at http://www.doe.gov/bridge Available for a processing fee to U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 21 the Chemistry of Carboxylic Acid Derivatives
    Instructor Supplemental Solutions to Problems © 2010 Roberts and Company Publishers Chapter 21 The Chemistry of Carboxylic Acid Derivatives Solutions to In-Text Problems 21.1 (b) (d) (e) (h) 21.2 (a) butanenitrile (common: butyronitrile) (c) isopentyl 3-methylbutanoate (common: isoamyl isovalerate) The isoamyl group is the same as an isopentyl or 3-methylbutyl group: (d) N,N-dimethylbenzamide 21.3 The E and Z conformations of N-acetylproline: 21.5 As shown by the data above the problem, a carboxylic acid has a higher boiling point than an ester because it can both donate and accept hydrogen bonds within its liquid state; hydrogen bonding does not occur in the ester. Consequently, pentanoic acid (valeric acid) has a higher boiling point than methyl butanoate. Here are the actual data: INSTRUCTOR SUPPLEMENTAL SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS • CHAPTER 21 2 21.7 (a) The carbonyl absorption of the ester occurs at higher frequency, and only the carboxylic acid has the characteristic strong, broad O—H stretching absorption in 2400–3600 cm–1 region. (d) In N-methylpropanamide, the N-methyl group is a doublet at about d 3. N-Ethylacetamide has no doublet resonances. In N-methylpropanamide, the a-protons are a quartet near d 2.5. In N-ethylacetamide, the a- protons are a singlet at d 2. The NMR spectrum of N-methylpropanamide has no singlets. 21.9 (a) The first ester is more basic because its conjugate acid is stabilized not only by resonance interaction with the ester oxygen, but also by resonance interaction with the double bond; that is, the conjugate acid of the first ester has one more important resonance structure than the conjugate acid of the second.
    [Show full text]
  • Formation of Highly Oxygenated Organic Molecules from Aromatic Compounds
    Formation of highly oxygenated organic molecules from aromatic compounds. Ugo Molteni1, Federico Bianchi1-2, Felix Klein1, Imad El Haddad1, Carla Frege1, Michel J. Rossi1, Josef Dommen1, Urs Baltensperger1,* 5 1Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland 2Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland Correspondence to: Urs Baltensperger ([email protected]) Abstract 10 Anthropogenic volatile organic compounds (AVOC) often dominate the urban atmosphere and consist to a large degree of aromatic hydrocarbons (ArHC), such as benzene, toluene, xylenes, and trimethylbenzenes, e.g. from handling and combustion of fuels. These compounds are important precursors for the formation of secondary organic aerosol. Despite their recognized importance as atmospheric reactants, the formation of highly oxygenated molecules (HOMs) in the gas phase leading to (extremely) low volatility compounds has not been studied in the past. Here we show that oxidation of 15 aromatics with OH leads to a subsequent autoxidation chain reaction forming HOMs with an O:C ratio of up to 1.09. This is exemplified for five single-ring ArHC (benzene, toluene, o-/m-/p-xylene, mesitylene (1,3,5-trimethylbenzene) and ethylbenzene), as well as two conjugated polycyclic ArHC (naphthalene and biphenyl). We present the identified compounds, differences in the observed oxidation patterns and discuss mechanistic pathways. We report the elemental composition of the HOMs and show the differences in the oxidation patterns of these ArHCs. A potential pathway for the 20 formation of these HOMs from aromatics is presented and discussed. We hypothesize that AVOC may contribute substantially to new particle formation events that have been detected in urban areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport of Dangerous Goods
    ST/SG/AC.10/1/Rev.16 (Vol.I) Recommendations on the TRANSPORT OF DANGEROUS GOODS Model Regulations Volume I Sixteenth revised edition UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2009 NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. ST/SG/AC.10/1/Rev.16 (Vol.I) Copyright © United Nations, 2009 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may, for sales purposes, be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, electrostatic, magnetic tape, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without prior permission in writing from the United Nations. UNITED NATIONS Sales No. E.09.VIII.2 ISBN 978-92-1-139136-7 (complete set of two volumes) ISSN 1014-5753 Volumes I and II not to be sold separately FOREWORD The Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods are addressed to governments and to the international organizations concerned with safety in the transport of dangerous goods. The first version, prepared by the United Nations Economic and Social Council's Committee of Experts on the Transport of Dangerous Goods, was published in 1956 (ST/ECA/43-E/CN.2/170). In response to developments in technology and the changing needs of users, they have been regularly amended and updated at succeeding sessions of the Committee of Experts pursuant to Resolution 645 G (XXIII) of 26 April 1957 of the Economic and Social Council and subsequent resolutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Metabolic-Hydroxy and Carboxy Functionalization of Alkyl Moieties in Drug Molecules: Prediction of Structure Influence and Pharmacologic Activity
    molecules Review Metabolic-Hydroxy and Carboxy Functionalization of Alkyl Moieties in Drug Molecules: Prediction of Structure Influence and Pharmacologic Activity Babiker M. El-Haj 1,* and Samrein B.M. Ahmed 2 1 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, University of Science and Technology of Fujairah, Fufairah 00971, UAE 2 College of Medicine, Sharjah Institute for Medical Research, University of Sharjah, Sharjah 00971, UAE; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 6 February 2020; Accepted: 7 April 2020; Published: 22 April 2020 Abstract: Alkyl moieties—open chain or cyclic, linear, or branched—are common in drug molecules. The hydrophobicity of alkyl moieties in drug molecules is modified by metabolic hydroxy functionalization via free-radical intermediates to give primary, secondary, or tertiary alcohols depending on the class of the substrate carbon. The hydroxymethyl groups resulting from the functionalization of methyl groups are mostly oxidized further to carboxyl groups to give carboxy metabolites. As observed from the surveyed cases in this review, hydroxy functionalization leads to loss, attenuation, or retention of pharmacologic activity with respect to the parent drug. On the other hand, carboxy functionalization leads to a loss of activity with the exception of only a few cases in which activity is retained. The exceptions are those groups in which the carboxy functionalization occurs at a position distant from a well-defined primary pharmacophore. Some hydroxy metabolites, which are equiactive with their parent drugs, have been developed into ester prodrugs while carboxy metabolites, which are equiactive to their parent drugs, have been developed into drugs as per se.
    [Show full text]
  • Methyl Substitution Effects on the Proton Chemical Shifts in Benzene *
    Methyl Substitution Effects on the Proton Chemical Shifts in Benzene * G. S. REDDY E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Inc. Explosives Department, Eastern Laboratory, Gibbstown, New Jersey, U.S.A. (Z. Naturforschg. 21 a, 609—615 [1966] ; received 16 December 1965) Methyl substitution effects on aromatic and methyl proton chemical shifts in several mono-, di-, and trimethyl benzenes are studied. A new method for obtaining the changes in the ring proton chemical shifts from those of methyl proton shifts at the corresponding positions is used. The extra jr-electron densities in toluene are calculated using the already known relation between the jr-elec- tron densities and the proton shifts in aromatic systems. An inverse relationship is obtained between the ionization potentials and the total methyl effects on the chemical shifts in this series of com- pounds as one would expect. Dipole moment of toluene is calculated, and a reasonably good agree- ment is found between the experimentally observed and the calculated dipole moment. Several efforts have been made from time to Considerable work has also been done in estimat- time to study the substitution effects on chemical ing ir-electron densities from chemical shift meas- shifts and coupling constants. One of the earliest urements in unsaturated systems. This study in- attempts in this line are those of CAVANAUGH and volves extension of the substitution effects and also DAILEY 1 who tried to study the effect of multiple estimating jr-electron densities in methyl benzenes. methyl substitution in methane. They encountered Eight mono-, di-, and trimethyl substituted benzenes negative shifts contrary to expectations based on have been studied, and a new technique has been inductive and hyperconjugative effects of the methyl deployed to obtain the methyl substitution effects group which eventually was attributed to the an- on the chemical shifts of ring protons from proton isotropy effect of the added C — C bonds 2-7.
    [Show full text]
  • Aromaticity Sem- Ii
    AROMATICITY SEM- II In 1931, German chemist and physicist Sir Erich Hückel proposed a theory to help determine if a planar ring molecule would have aromatic properties .This is a very popular and useful rule to identify aromaticity in monocyclic conjugated compound. According to which a planar monocyclic conjugated system having ( 4n +2) delocalised (where, n = 0, 1, 2, .....) electrons are known as aromatic compound . For example: Benzene, Naphthalene, Furan, Pyrrole etc. Criteria for Aromaticity 1) The molecule is cyclic (a ring of atoms) 2) The molecule is planar (all atoms in the molecule lie in the same plane) 3) The molecule is fully conjugated (p orbitals at every atom in the ring) 4) The molecule has 4n+2 π electrons (n=0 or any positive integer Why 4n+2π Electrons? According to Hückel's Molecular Orbital Theory, a compound is particularly stable if all of its bonding molecular orbitals are filled with paired electrons. - This is true of aromatic compounds, meaning they are quite stable. - With aromatic compounds, 2 electrons fill the lowest energy molecular orbital, and 4 electrons fill each subsequent energy level (the number of subsequent energy levels is denoted by n), leaving all bonding orbitals filled and no anti-bonding orbitals occupied. This gives a total of 4n+2π electrons. - As for example: Benzene has 6π electrons. Its first 2π electrons fill the lowest energy orbital, and it has 4π electrons remaining. These 4 fill in the orbitals of the succeeding energy level. The criteria for Antiaromaticity are as follows: 1) The molecule must be cyclic and completely conjugated 2) The molecule must be planar.
    [Show full text]
  • 11.8 Aromatic Compounds Aromatic Compounds Naming Aromatic
    11.8 Aromatic Compounds In 1825, Michael Faraday isolated a hydrocarbon called benzene, which consists of a six-carbon ring with alternating double bonds and has the molecular formula C6H6. Learning Goal Describe the bonding in benzene; name aromatic compounds, and draw their skeletal formulas. Chemistry: An Introduction to General, Organic, and Biological Chemistry, Twelfth Edition © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. Aromatic Compounds Benzene is • an aromatic compound • a ring of six C atoms, each bonded to one H atom • a flat ring structure drawn with three alternating double bonds • represented by two structures because the electrons are shared equally among all the C atoms • represented by a skeletal formula using a circle in the center instead of the alternating double bonds Chemistry: An Introduction to General, Organic, and Biological Chemistry, Twelfth Edition © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. Naming Aromatic Compounds Aromatic compounds containing a benzene ring and a single substituent are named as benzene derivatives. Since the ring contains only one substituent, the ring is not numbered. Some common names such as toluene, aniline, and phenol are allowed by IUPAC rules. Chemistry: An Introduction to General, Organic, and Biological Chemistry, Twelfth Edition © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 Naming Aromatic Compounds When there are two or more substituents, the benzene ring is numbered to give the lowest numbers to the substituents. Chemistry: An Introduction to General, Organic, and Biological Chemistry, Twelfth Edition © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc. Naming Aromatic Compounds When a common name such as toluene, phenol, or aniline can be used, • the carbon atom attached to the methyl, hydroxyl, or amine group is numbered as carbon 1 • the other substituents are named alphabetically Chemistry: An Introduction to General, Organic, and Biological Chemistry, Twelfth Edition © 2015 Pearson Education, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Groups Kimberly Hatch Harrison
    Functional Groups Kimberly Hatch Harrison Functional groups are those small chemical species you see hanging off the outside of a molecule. Just a handful of these functional groups de- termine most of the chemical reactions that happen between biological molecules. If you memorize the chemical behavior of these functional groups, you’ll be able to predict what kinds of reactions biological molecules can do. You can’t open a lock with a screwdriver–the shape of a screwdriver is quite different from a key, which means it has a dif- ferent function. "Form determines function" is something you’ll hear over and over in biochemistry, and that’s because it’s true. The over- all 3-dimensional shape of a molecule allows it to fit into another molecule, like how a key fits into a lock. But not all keys are the same. You have to look closely at the teeth of a key to see which lock it can open. Similarly, you need to look at the details of the outside of a molecule to understand what kinds of chemical interactions it can do with other molecules. How the carbon skeleton of a biological molecule is folded up de- termines its general 3D shape. So that’s one level of understanding– this molecule looks like a key, this one looks like a lock, etc. But then you must look closer, at the surface details, to understand exactly which key, exactly what kind of lock. When you examine the outside of a biological molecule, you can identify which functional groups are standing out on its surface, like little flags.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Studies on the Aromaticity and Antiaromaticity of Planar Cyclooctatetraene
    Symmetry 2010 , 2, 76-97; doi:10.3390/sym2010076 OPEN ACCESS symmetry ISSN 2073-8994 www.mdpi.com/journal/symmetry Review Recent Studies on the Aromaticity and Antiaromaticity of Planar Cyclooctatetraene Tohru Nishinaga *, Takeshi Ohmae and Masahiko Iyoda Department of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan; E-Mails: [email protected] (T.O.); [email protected] (M.I.) * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]. Received: 29 December 2009; in revised form: 23 January 2010 / Accepted: 4 February 2010 / Published: 5 February 2010 Abstract: Cyclooctatetraene (COT), the first 4n π-electron system to be studied, adopts an inherently nonplanar tub-shaped geometry of D2d symmetry with alternating single and double bonds, and hence behaves as a nonaromatic polyene rather than an antiaromatic compound. Recently, however, considerable 8 π-antiaromatic paratropicity has been shown to be generated in planar COT rings even with the bond alternated D4h structure. In this review, we highlight recent theoretical and experimental studies on the antiaromaticity of hypothetical and actual planar COT. In addition, theoretically predicted triplet aromaticity and stacked aromaticity of planar COT are also briefly described. Keywords: antiaromaticity; cyclooctatetraene; NMR chemical shifts; quantum chemical calculations; ring current 1. Introduction Cyclooctatetraene (COT) was first prepared by Willstätter in 1911 [1,2]. At that time, the special stability of benzene was elusive and it was of interest to learn the reactivity of COT as the next higher vinylogue of benzene. However, unlike benzene, COT was found to be highly reactive to electrophiles just like other alkenes.
    [Show full text]
  • Alkylation of Aromatic Hydrocarbons with Divinylbenzene by Solid Polymeric Oxo Acids
    Polymer Journal, Vol. 13, No.9, pp 915-917 (1981) NOTE Alkylation of Aromatic Hydrocarbons with Divinylbenzene by Solid Polymeric Oxo Acids Hiroshi HASEGAWA and Toshinobu HIGASHIMURA Department of Polymer Chemistry, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606, Japan. (Received February 28, 1981) KEY WORDS Solid Polymeric Oxo Acid I Alkylation I Bis(l-arylethyl)- benzene I Nafion-H I Amberlyst 151 Divinylbenzene I Aromatic Hydrocar­ bons I In our recent papers on the alkylation of aromatic hydrocarbons with styrene (eq 1),u we have shown that solid polymeric oxo acids as catalysts can bring about higher yields of 1-phenyl-1-arylethane (I) than the corresponding soluble oxo acids [e.g., poly(styrenesulfonic acid) (Amberlyst 15) vs. p­ CH3C6H4S03H; perfluorinated resinsulfonic acid (Nafion-H) vs. CF S0 H]. In view of the easy 3 3 yH3 yH3 separation of the product from the catalyst, the use (2) of these effective polymeric oxo acids should be H H industrially more advantageous than homogeneous (II) processes using soluble acidic catalysts. H H EXPERIMENTAL ) CH3-t-Ar + ift' CH2© ) Aromatic Hydrocarbons © Materials (I) (1) The DVB used in most experiments was an isomeric mixture (m-DVB/p-DVB = 70/30, purity;::: This article deals with the alkylation of aromatic 98%) separated from a commercial mixture of hydrocarbons (toluene and m-xylene) with divinyl­ DVB (60%) and ethylvinylbenzene (40%) by benzene (DVB) catalyzed by solid polymeric oxo preparative liquid chromatography.5 p-DVB and m­ acids (Nafion-H and Amberlyst 15). If the two vinyl DVB were isolated from the commercial mixture by groups in DVB, as in the case of styrene, react the method of Storey et a/.
    [Show full text]
  • Reactions of Aromatic Compounds Just Like an Alkene, Benzene Has Clouds of  Electrons Above and Below Its Sigma Bond Framework
    Reactions of Aromatic Compounds Just like an alkene, benzene has clouds of electrons above and below its sigma bond framework. Although the electrons are in a stable aromatic system, they are still available for reaction with strong electrophiles. This generates a carbocation which is resonance stabilized (but not aromatic). This cation is called a sigma complex because the electrophile is joined to the benzene ring through a new sigma bond. The sigma complex (also called an arenium ion) is not aromatic since it contains an sp3 carbon (which disrupts the required loop of p orbitals). Ch17 Reactions of Aromatic Compounds (landscape).docx Page1 The loss of aromaticity required to form the sigma complex explains the highly endothermic nature of the first step. (That is why we require strong electrophiles for reaction). The sigma complex wishes to regain its aromaticity, and it may do so by either a reversal of the first step (i.e. regenerate the starting material) or by loss of the proton on the sp3 carbon (leading to a substitution product). When a reaction proceeds this way, it is electrophilic aromatic substitution. There are a wide variety of electrophiles that can be introduced into a benzene ring in this way, and so electrophilic aromatic substitution is a very important method for the synthesis of substituted aromatic compounds. Ch17 Reactions of Aromatic Compounds (landscape).docx Page2 Bromination of Benzene Bromination follows the same general mechanism for the electrophilic aromatic substitution (EAS). Bromine itself is not electrophilic enough to react with benzene. But the addition of a strong Lewis acid (electron pair acceptor), such as FeBr3, catalyses the reaction, and leads to the substitution product.
    [Show full text]