DOCSLIB.ORG

Primordial Backgrounds of Relic Gravitons Arxiv:1912.07065V2 [Astro

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Primordial Backgrounds of Relic Gravitons Arxiv:1912.07065V2 [Astro Primordial backgrounds of relic gravitons Massimo Giovannini∗ Department of Physics, CERN, 1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland INFN, Section of Milan-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy Abstract The diffuse backgrounds of relic gravitons with frequencies ranging between the aHz band and the GHz region encode the ultimate information on the primeval evolution of the plasma and on the underlying theory of gravity well before the electroweak epoch. While the temperature and polarization anisotropies of the microwave background radiation probe the low-frequency tail of the graviton spectra, during the next score year the pulsar timing arrays and the wide-band interferometers (both terrestrial and hopefully space-borne) will explore a much larger frequency window encompassing the nHz domain and the audio band. The salient theoretical aspects of the relic gravitons are reviewed in a cross-disciplinary perspective touching upon various unsettled questions of particle physics, cosmology and astrophysics. CERN-TH-2019-166 arXiv:1912.07065v2 [astro-ph.CO] 19 Mar 2020 ∗Electronic address: [email protected] 1 Contents 1 The cosmic spectrum of relic gravitons 4 1.1 Typical frequencies of the relic gravitons . 4 1.1.1 Low-frequencies . 5 1.1.2 Intermediate frequencies . 6 1.1.3 High-frequencies . 7 1.2 The concordance paradigm . 8 1.3 Cosmic photons versus cosmic gravitons . 9 1.4 Relic gravitons and large-scale inhomogeneities . 13 1.4.1 Quantum origin of cosmological inhomogeneities . 13 1.4.2 Weyl invariance and relic gravitons . 13 1.4.3 Inflation, concordance paradigm and beyond . 14 1.5 Notations, units and summary . 14 2 The tensor modes of the geometry 17 2.1 The tensor modes in flat space-time . 17 2.2 The tensor modes in curved space-times . 18 2.3 The tensor modes in cosmological space-times . 20 2.4 Relativistic cosmological fluctuations . 21 2.5 Gauge-invariant normal modes . 23 2.6 Supplementary polarizations? . 24 2.7 Tensor modes in Fourier space . 26 3 Effective action and energy density of the relic gravitons 28 3.1 Effective action for the relic gravitons . 29 3.1.1 Non-covariant derivation . 29 3.1.2 Covariant derivation . 31 3.1.3 Effective Hamiltonians . 32 3.1.4 Frame-invariance of the effective action . 32 3.2 Polarized backgrounds of relic gravitons and effective theories . 34 3.2.1 Spinor action for polarized backgrounds of relic gravitons . 35 3.3 Classical and quantum fluctuations in cosmology . 36 3.3.1 The quantum theory of parametric amplification . 37 3.3.2 Continuous mode squeezed states . 39 3.3.3 Two-point functions and power spectra . 41 3.4 Effective energy density of the relic gravitons . 42 3.4.1 The rate of variation of the background . 43 3.4.2 Super-adiabatic amplification . 45 3.4.3 Effective energy-momentum pseudo-tensor relic gravitons . 45 3.4.4 Drawbacks of other proposals for the energy density of the relic gravitons . 48 3.5 Relations among the observables . 50 4 Relic gravitons from the early universe 53 4.1 Scales exiting during inflation . 54 4.1.1 Consistency conditions . 56 4.1.2 The maximal comoving frequency and the number of e-folds . 58 4.2 Sakharov oscillations and standing waves . 59 4.2.1 Standing waves in a radiation-dominated plasma . 59 2 4.2.2 Standing waves in a dust-dominated plasma . 60 4.3 Wavelengths reentering when the radiation dominates . 61 4.3.1 The power spectra in a plasma dominated by radiation . 61 4.3.2 The effect of the evolution of the relativistic species . 63 4.3.3 The effect of neutrino free streaming . 64 4.4 Wavelengths reentering when the dust dominates . 65 4.4.1 The power spectra in a plasma dominated by dust . 66 4.4.2 The concept of transfer function . 67 4.4.3 Approximate normalization of the spectrum . 69 4.5 Wavelengths reentering when the dark energy dominates . 70 4.5.1 Wavelengths that are currently inside the Hubble radius . 71 4.5.2 Wavelengths that are currently outside the Hubble radius . 72 4.6 The graviton spectra in the concordance paradigm . 73 5 The low-frequency band 74 5.1 Temperature and polarization anisotropies . 74 5.2 The effects of the relic gravitons . 76 5.3 The scalar and tensor Einstein-Boltzmann hierarchies . 77 5.4 The evolution of the temperature and of the polarization anisotropies . 80 5.5 Angular power spectra for the E-mode and B-mode polarizations . 84 5.6 Low-frequency modifications of the tensor power spectra . 85 5.7 Direct and indirect bounds on the tensor to scalar ratio . 88 5.8 Plateau-like potentials and a theory for the scalar spectral index . 89 6 The intermediate frequency band 91 6.1 Early deviations from the concordance scenario . 91 6.2 WKB approach and the blue spectral slopes . 94 6.3 Sufficient conditions for blue and violet spectra . 97 6.4 Early evolution of the refractive index of the relic gravitons . 100 6.5 Big-bang nucleosynthesis . 101 6.6 The big-bang nucleosynthesis bound . 103 6.7 The bounds from the pulsar timing array . 104 6.8 Potential signals from cosmic strings . 105 6.9 Potential signals from the electroweak epoch . 107 7 The high-frequency band 110 7.1 High-frequency gravitons and post-inflationary thermal history . 110 7.2 Spikes and scaling violations at high frequencies . 113 7.3 Secondary spectra of high-frequency gravitons from reheating . 115 7.4 Hanbury-Brown Twiss effect and the quantumness of relic gravitons . 116 8 Stochastic backgrounds of relic gravitons: observations 120 8.1 The early history of the detection of gravitational waves . 120 8.1.1 Resonant mass detectors . 120 8.1.2 Interferometric detection of gravitational waves . 121 8.2 Wide-band interferometers in space . 123 8.3 Bounds on relic gravitons from operating ground-based detectors . 126 8.4 Electro-mechanical detectors and high-frequency gravitons . 128 9 Concluding perspectives 129 3 1 The cosmic spectrum of relic gravitons The LIGO/Virgo collaboration recently published the three-detector observations of gravitational waves from black-hole coalescence [1], the evidence of gravitational waves from neutron star inspiral [2], and the observation of a 50-solar-mass binary black hole coalescence for a redshift z = 0:2 [3]. It is fair to say that the recent discoveries of wide-band interferometers [1, 2, 3] are fostering an unprecedented development of gravitational wave astronomy. The goal of this article is instead to scrutinize the theory of the relic gravitons, i.e. gravitons produced during the earliest stages of the evolution of the cosmic plasma. The energies and the frequencies of these massless particles are suppressed by the cosmic expansion so that their corresponding wavelengths are redshifted and may even be comparable with the diameter of the current Hubble patch. In many respects the cosmic gravitons bear analogy to the diffuse electromagnetic backgrounds with the notable difference that the microwave photons observed today last scattered free electrons and protons at a typical redshift zdec ' 1090, while the relic gravitons come from a stage when the Hubble rate was nearly Planckian. Even if specific attention will be paid to the hoped sensitivities of the forthcoming detectors, the main emphasis of this article will be on the theoretical aspects and on the uncertainties of the potential signals. Table 1: Typical frequencies, energies and wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum. band frequency [Hz] energy [eV] wavelength [m] γ-rays ZHz = 1021 Hz 4 MeV = 4 × 106 eV 3 × 10−13 m soft x-rays EHz = 1018 Hz 4 keV = 4 × 103 eV 3 × 10−10 m ultraviolet PHz = 1015 Hz 4 eV 3 × 10−7 m infrared THz = 1012 Hz 4 meV = 4 × 10−3 eV 3 × 10−4 m microwaves GHz = 109 Hz 4µeV = 4 × 10−6 eV 0:3 m radio waves (HF) MHz = 106 Hz 4neV = 4 × 10−9 eV 300 m radio waves (LF) kHz = 103 Hz 4 peV = 4 × 10−12 eV 3 × 105 m low frequency waves Hz 4 feV = 4 × 10−15 eV 3 × 108 m 1.1 Typical frequencies of the relic gravitons In a preliminary perspective it is useful to compare the gravitational and the electromagnetic spectra even if the origins of the two emissions are very different. The typical frequencies, wavelengths and energies of the electromagnetic spectra are illustrated in Tab. 1 from the ultra low-frequency region1 (of the order of the Hz) up to the γ-ray band (of the order of few ZHz). The gravitational spectra of Tab. 2 extend instead between few aHz and, approximately, 100 GHz. The range of frequencies roughly spans 20 orders of magnitude in the case of the photons and 30 orders of magnitude in the case of the gravitons. While the various frequency bands introduced in Tab. 2 have their own peculiar features, the spectrum of the relic gravitons can be divided in three major domains that will be described in this introductory section and more extensively discussed in the remaining part of the article. In the electromagnetic case we talk about electromagnetic waves when discussing radio waves but al- ready for wavelengths of the order of the mm the particle description is preferable so that it is customary to discuss, for instance, the energy density and the concentration of the microwave background photons. For the same reasons we use the wording x-ray photons or γ-ray photons for the high-frequency branch 1Standard prefixes will be used throughout to simplify the discussions: for instance 1 GHz = 10−9 Hz, 1 feV = 10−15 eV and so on and so forth.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Atomic Interferometric Gravitational-Wave Space Observatory (AIGSO)
    Atomic Interferometric Gravitational-wave Space Observatory (AIGSO) Dongfeng Gao1,2,,∗ Jin Wang1,2, and Mingsheng Zhan1,2,† 1 State Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance and Atomic and Molecular Physics, Wuhan Institute of Physics and Mathematics, Chinese Academy of Sciences - Wuhan National Laboratory for Optoelectronics, Wuhan 430071, China 2 Center for Cold Atom Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China (Dated: January 17, 2018) We propose a space-borne gravitational-wave detection scheme, called atom interferometric gravitational-wave space observatory (AIGSO). It is motivated by the progress in the atomic matter- wave interferometry, which solely utilizes the standing light waves to split, deflect and recombine the atomic beam. Our scheme consists of three drag-free satellites orbiting the Earth. The phase shift of AIGSO is dominated by the Sagnac effect of gravitational-waves, which is proportional to the area enclosed by the atom interferometer, the frequency and amplitude of gravitational-waves. The scheme has a strain sensitivity < 10−20/√Hz in the 100 mHz-10 Hz frequency range, which fills in the detection gap between space-based and ground-based laser interferometric detectors. Thus, our proposed AIGSO can be a good complementary detection scheme to the space-borne laser inter- ferometric schemes, such as LISA. Considering the current status of relevant technology readiness, we expect our AIGSO to be a promising candidate for the future space-based gravitational-wave detection plan. Keywords: Gravitational waves, Atomic Sagnac interferometer, Space-borne detector arXiv:1711.03690v2 [physics.atom-ph] 16 Jan 2018 ∗ [email protected] † [email protected] 2 I. INTRODUCTION An important prediction of Einstein’s theory of general relativity is the existence of gravitational waves (GWs).
    [Show full text]
  • Atom Interferometry in an Optical Cavity by Matthew Jaffe a Dissertation Submitted in Partial Satisfaction of the Requirements F
    Atom interferometry in an optical cavity by Matthew Jaffe A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Associate Professor Holger Müller, Chair Associate Professor Norman Yao Professor Karl van Bibber Fall 2018 Atom interferometry in an optical cavity Copyright 2018 by Matthew Jaffe 1 Abstract Atom interferometry in an optical cavity by Matthew Jaffe Doctor of Philosophy in Physics University of California, Berkeley Associate Professor Holger Müller, Chair Matter wave interferometry with laser pulses has become a powerful tool for precision measurement. Optical resonators, meanwhile, are an indispensable tool for control of laser beams. We have combined these two components, and built the first atom interferometer inside of an optical cavity. This apparatus was then used to examine interactions between atoms and a small, in-vacuum source mass. We measured the gravitational attraction to the source mass, making it the smallest source body ever probed gravitationally with an atom interferometer. Searching for additional forces due to screened fields, we tightened constraints on certain dark energy models by several orders of magnitude. Finally, we measured a novel force mediated by blackbody radiation for the first time. Utilizing technical benefits of the cavity, we performed interferometry with adiabatic passage. This enabled new interferometer geometries, large momentum transfer, and in- terferometers with up to one hundred pulses. Performing a trapped interferometer to take advantage of the clean wavefronts within the optical cavity, we performed the longest du- ration spatially-separated atom interferometer to date: over ten seconds, after which the atomic wavefunction was coherently recombined and read out as interference to measure gravity.
    [Show full text]
  • Cold Atom Interferometry Sensors: Physics and Technologies
    Cold atom interferometry sensors: physics and technologies A scientific background for EU policymaking Travagnin, M. 2020 EUR 30289 EN This publication is a Technical report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. Contact information Name: Martino Travagnin Email: [email protected] EU Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc JRC121223 EUR 30289 EN PDF ISBN 978-92-76-20405-3 ISSN 1831-9424 doi:10.2760/315209 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2020 © European Union, 2020 The reuse policy of the European Commission is implemented by Commission Decision 2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). Reuse is authorised, provided the source of the document is acknowledged and its original meaning or message is not distorted. The European Commission shall not be liable for any consequence stemming from the reuse. For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not owned by the EU, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. All content © European Union, 2020 How to cite this report: M. Travagnin, Cold atom interferometry sensors: physics and technologies. A scientific background for EU policymaking, 2020, EUR 30289 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2020, ISBN 978- 92-76-20405-3, doi:10.2760/315209, JRC121223 Contents Acknowledgements ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Atom Interferometry for Detection of Gravitational Waves
    Atom Interferometry for Detection of Gravitational Waves NIAC Phase 1 Final Report Babak n. saif • jason hogan • mark a kasevich july 09, 2013 Atom Interferometry for Detection of Gravitational Waves Table of Contents 1.Introduction . 1-1 1.1 NAIC Phase 1 Study Concept . 1-1 1.2 NAIC Phase 1 Project Summary . 1-2 2. System Architectures. .1-3 2.1 Three Satellite Rb . 1-3 2.2 Two Satellite Rb . 1-4 2.3 Two Satellite Sr . 1-4 3. Single Photon Gravitational Wave Detection . 1-5 3.1 Introduction . 1-5 3.2 A New Type of Atom Interferometer . 1-6 3.3 A Differential Measurement . 1-7 3.4 Backgrounds . 1-8 3.5 Atomic Implementation . 1-9 3.6 Discussion . 1-9 4. Point Source Interferometry . 1-10 5. Enhanced Atom Interferometer Readout through the Application of Phase Shear . 1-14 Appendix A . 1-20 Bibliography . 1-37 Atom Interferometry for Detection of Gravitational Waves 1. Introduction Gravitational wave (GW) detection promises to open an exciting new observational frontier in astronomy and cosmology. In contrast to light, gravitational waves are generated by moving masses – rather than electric charges – which means that they can tell us about objects that are difficult to observe optically. For example, binary black hole systems (which might not emit much light) can be an ample source of gravitational radiation. In addition to providing insights into astrophysics, observa- tions of such extreme systems test general relativity and might influence our understanding of gravity. Cosmologically, since GWs are poorly screened by concentrations of matter and charge, they can see places other telescopes cannot – even to the earliest times in the universe, beyond the surface of last scattering.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of Gravitational-Wave Detectors Different Frequency
    The Status of Gravitational Wave Detectors The Status of Gravitational-Wave Detectors Reported on behalf of LIGO colleagues by Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory LIGO-G030249-02-W Different Frequency Bands of Detectors and Sources space terrestrial ● EM waves are studied over ~20 Audio band orders of magnitude » (ULF radio −> HE γ rays) ● Gravitational Wave coverage over ~8 orders of magnitude » (terrestrial + space) LIGO-G030249-02-W LIGO Detector Commissioning 2 Fred Raab, Caltech & LIGO (KITP Gravitation Conference 5/12/03) 1 The Status of Gravitational Wave Detectors Basic Signature of Gravitational Waves for All Detectors LIGO-G030249-02-W LIGO Detector Commissioning 3 Original Terrestrial Detectors Continue to be Improved AURIGA II Resonant Bar Detector 1E-20 AURIGA I run LHe4 vessel Al2081 AURIGA II run Cryo ] 2 / 1 holder - Electronics z 1E-21 H [ 2 / 1 wiring hh support S AURIGA II run UltraCryo 1E-22 Main 850 860 880 900 920 940 950 Frequency [Hz] Attenuator Thermal Sensitive bar Shield •Efforts to broaden frequency range and reduce noise Compression •Size limited by sound speed Spring Transducer Courtesy M. Cerdonnio LIGO-G030249-02-W LIGO Detector Commissioning 4 Fred Raab, Caltech & LIGO (KITP Gravitation Conference 5/12/03) 2 The Status of Gravitational Wave Detectors New Generation of “Free- Mass” Detectors Now Online suspended mirrors mark inertial frames antisymmetric port carries GW signal Symmetric port carries common-mode info Intrinsically broad band and size-limited by speed of light. LIGO-G030249-02-W LIGO Detector
    [Show full text]
  • Gravitational Waves and Core-Collapse Supernovae
    Gravitational waves and core-collapse supernovae G.S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan(1,2), S.G. Moiseenko(1) (1)Space Research Institute, Profsoyznaya str/ 84/32, Moscow 117997, Russia (2)National Research Nuclear University MEPhI, Kashirskoe shosse 32,115409 Moscow, Russia Abstract. A mechanism of formation of gravitational waves in 1. Introduction the Universe is considered for a nonspherical collapse of matter. Nonspherical collapse results are presented for a uniform spher- On February 11, 2016, LIGO (Laser Interferometric Gravita- oid of dust and a finite-entropy spheroid. Numerical simulation tional-wave Observatory) in the USA with great fanfare results on core-collapse supernova explosions are presented for announced the registration of a gravitational wave (GW) the neutrino and magneto-rotational models. These results are signal on September 14, 2015 [1]. A fantastic coincidence is used to estimate the dimensionless amplitude of the gravita- that the discovery was made exactly 100 years after the tional wave with a frequency m 1300 Hz, radiated during the prediction of GWs by Albert Einstein on the basis of his collapse of the rotating core of a pre-supernova with a mass of theory of General Relativity (GR) (the theory of space and 1:2 M (calculated by the authors in 2D). This estimate agrees time). A detailed discussion of the results of this experiment well with many other calculations (presented in this paper) that and related problems can be found in [2±6]. have been done in 2D and 3D settings and which rely on more Gravitational waves can be emitted by binary stars due to exact and sophisticated calculations of the gravitational wave their relative motion or by collapsing nonspherical bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Atom Interferometry for Tests of General Relativity, Phd Thesis, Leibniz Universität Hannover © 2020 Für Opa
    ATOMINTERFEROMETRYFOR TESTSOFGENERALRELATIVITY Von der QUEST-Leibniz-Forschungsschule der Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover zur Erlangung des Grades Doktor der Naturwissenschaften - Dr. rer. nat. - genehmigte Dissertation von M.Sc. Sina Leon Loriani Fard geboren am 06.10.1993 in Hamburg 2020 referent Prof. Dr. Ernst Maria Rasel Institut für Quantenoptik Leibniz Universität Hannover korreferent Prof. Dr. Peter Wolf LNE-SYRTE, Observatoire de Paris Université PSL, CNRS korreferent Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Ertmer Institut für Quantenoptik Leibniz Universität Hannover vorsitzende der prüfungskommission Prof. Dr. Michèle Heurs Institut für Gravitationsphysik Leibniz Universität Hannover tag der promotion: 07.10.2020 Sina Loriani: Atom interferometry for tests of General Relativity, PhD Thesis, Leibniz Universität Hannover © 2020 Für Opa. .ÑÃPQK .PYK éK. ÑK Y®K ABSTRACT The search for a fundamental, self-consistent theoretical framework to cover phe- nomena over all energy scales is possibly the most challenging quest of contempo- rary physics. Approaches to reconcile quantum mechanics and general relativity entail the modification of their foundations such as the equivalence principle. This corner stone of general relativity is suspected to be violated in various scenarios and is therefore under close scrutiny. Experiments based on the manipulation of cold atoms are excellently suited to challenge its different facets. Freely falling atoms constitute ideal test masses for tests of the universality of free fall in interfer- ometric setups. Moreover, the superposition of internal energy eigenstates provides the notion of a clock, which allows to perform tests of the gravitational redshift. Furthermore, as atom interferometers constitute outstanding phasemeters, they hold the promise to detect gravitational waves, another integral aspect of general relativity.
    [Show full text]
  • A Three-Dimensional Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Detector
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN A three‑dimensional laser interferometer gravitational‑wave detector Mengxu Liu & Biping Gong* The gravitational wave (GW) has opened a new window to the universe beyond the electromagnetic spectrum. Since 2015, dozens of GW events have been caught by the ground-based GW detectors through laser interferometry. However, all the ground-based detectors are L-shaped Michelson interferometers, with very limited directional response to GW. Here we propose a three-dimensional (3-D) laser interferometer detector in the shape of a regular triangular pyramid, which has more spherically symmetric antenna pattern. Moreover, the new confguration corresponds to much stronger constraints on parameters of GW sources, and is capable of constructing null-streams to get rid of the signal-like noise events. A 3-D detector of kilometer scale of such kind would shed new light on the joint search of GW and electromagnetic emission. Gravitational waves produced by dynamic acceleration of celestial objects are direct predictions of Einstein’s General Teory of Relativity. Together with the electromagnetic radiation, the physics of GW events can be investigated in a depth that has never achieved before. In the past decades, many GW detectors have been proposed and constructed, including the ground-based and the space-based detectors for various wavelength of gravitational waves1. Te basic idea of those gravitational wave detectors is to measure the relative displace- ment of the freely falling bodies through laser interferometetry. Currently, most GW detection on the ground are performed in the high frequency band (10 Hz–100 kHz), by the long arm laser interferometers, such as TAMA 300 m interferometer2, the GEO 600 m interferometer3, and the kilometer size laser-interferometric GW detectors like Advance LIGO (4 km arm length)4, Advance VIRGO (3 km arm length)5, and the following ET (10 km arm length)6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gravitational Wave Signal of the Short Rise Fling of Galactic Run Away
    Gravitational wave signal of the short rise fling of galactic run away pulsars ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION IN JCAP 17/10/2008 Herman J. Mosquera Cuesta1,2, Carlos A. Bonilla Quintero1 1Instituto de Cosmologia, Relatividade e Astrof´ısica (ICRA-BR), Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas F´ısicas ∗ Rua Dr. Xavier Sigaud 150, CEP 22290-180, Urca Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil (Dated: August 25, 2021) Determination of pulsar parallaxes and proper motions addresses fundamental astrophysical open issues. Here, after scrutinizing the ATNF Catalog searching for pulsar distances and proper motions, we verify that for an ATNF sample of 212 Galactic run away pulsars (RAPs), which currently run across the Galaxy at very high speed and undergo large displacements, some gravitational-wave (GW) signals produced by such present accelerations appear to be detectable after calibration against the Advanced LIGO (LIGO II). Motivated by this insight, we address the issue of the pulsar kick at birth, or short rise fling from a supernova explosion, by adapting the theory for emission of GW by ultrarelativistic sources to this case in which Lorentz factor is γ ∼ 1. We show that during the short rise fling each run away pulsar (RAP) generates a GW signal with characteristic amplitude and frequency that makes it detectable by current GW interferometers. For a realistic analysis, an efficiency parameter is introduced to quantify the expenditure of the rise fling kinetic energy, which is estimated from the linear momentum conservation law applied to the supernova explosion that kicks out the pulsar. The remaining energy is supposed to be used to make the star to spin.
    [Show full text]
  • Atom Interferometry for Fundamental Physics and Gravitational Wave Detection
    Atom interferometry for fundamental physics and gravitational wave detection CERN Jason Hogan Stanford University September 12, 2019 Science applications • Gravitational wave detection • Quantum mechanics at macroscopic scales • QED tests (alpha measurements) Compact binary inspiral • Quantum entanglement for enhanced readout • Equivalence principle tests, tests of GR • Short distance gravity • Search for dark matter • Atom charge neutrality Rb wavepackets separated by 54 cm Image: https://www2.physics.ox.ac.uk/research/dark-matter-dark-energy 2 Atom interference Light interferometer Light Light fringes Beamsplitter Atom Atom fringes interferometer Beamsplitter Atom Mirror http://scienceblogs.com/principles/2013/10/22/quantum-erasure/ 3 http://www.cobolt.se/interferometry.html Atom optics using light (1) Light absorption: ħk v = ħk/m (2) Stimulated emission: ħk 4 Atom optics using light (1) Light absorption: Rabi oscillations ħk v = ħk/m “Beamsplitter” “Mirror” (2) Stimulated emission: ħk Time 5 Light Pulse Atom Interferometry Beamsplitter p/2 pulse “beamsplitter” Position ћk Beamsplitter “mirror” Atom p pulse Mirror ћk Time “beamsplitter” p/2 pulse ћk |p› •Interior view |p+ћk› ћk 6 Light Pulse Atom Interferometry • Long duration • Large wavepacket separation 7 10 meter scale atomic fountain 8 Interference at long interrogation time Port 1 Port 2 Wavepacket separation at apex (this data 50 nK) 2T = 2.3 seconds 1.4 cm wavepacket separation Interference (3 nK cloud) Dickerson, et al., PRL 111, 083001 (2013). 9 Large space-time area atom
    [Show full text]
  • Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger B
    Selected for a Viewpoint in Physics week ending PRL 116, 061102 (2016) PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 12 FEBRUARY 2016 Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger B. P. Abbott et al.* (LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration) (Received 21 January 2016; published 11 February 2016) On September 14, 2015 at 09:50:45 UTC the two detectors of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory simultaneously observed a transient gravitational-wave signal. The signal sweeps upwards in frequency from 35 to 250 Hz with a peak gravitational-wave strain of 1.0 × 10−21. It matches the waveform predicted by general relativity for the inspiral and merger of a pair of black holes and the ringdown of the resulting single black hole. The signal was observed with a matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 24 and a false alarm rate estimated to be less than 1 event per 203 000 years, equivalent to a significance greater 5 1σ 410þ160 0 09þ0.03 than . The source lies at a luminosity distance of −180 Mpc corresponding to a redshift z ¼ . −0.04 . þ5 þ4 In the source frame, the initial black hole masses are 36−4 M⊙ and 29−4 M⊙, and the final black hole mass is 62þ4 3 0þ0.5 2 −4 M⊙,with . −0.5 M⊙c radiated in gravitational waves. All uncertainties define 90% credible intervals. These observations demonstrate the existence of binary stellar-mass black hole systems. This is the first direct detection of gravitational waves and the first observation of a binary black hole merger.
    [Show full text]
  • Taming the Quantum Noisehow Quantum Metrology Can Expand the Reach of Gravitational-Wave Observatories
    Taming the quantum noise How quantum metrology can expand the reach of gravitational-wave observatories Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades an der Fakultat¨ fur¨ Mathematik, Informatik und Naturwissenschaen Fachbereich Physik der Universitat¨ Hamburg vorgelegt von Mikhail Korobko Hamburg 2020 Gutachter/innen der Dissertation: Prof. Dr. Ludwig Mathey Prof. Dr. Roman Schnabel Zusammensetzung der Prufungskommission:¨ Prof. Dr. Peter Schmelcher Prof. Dr. Ludwig Mathey Prof. Dr. Henning Moritz Prof. Dr. Oliver Gerberding Prof. Dr. Roman Schnabel Vorsitzende/r der Prufungskommission:¨ Prof. Dr. Peter Schmelcher Datum der Disputation: 12.06.2020 Vorsitzender Fach-Promotionsausschusses PHYSIK: Prof. Dr. Gunter¨ Hans Walter Sigl Leiter des Fachbereichs PHYSIK: Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Hansen Dekan der Fakultat¨ MIN: Prof. Dr. Heinrich Graener List of Figures 2.1 Effect of a gravitational wave on a ring of free-falling masses, posi- tioned orthogonally to the propagation direction of the GW. 16 2.2 Michelson interferometer as gravitational-wave detector. 17 2.3 The sensitivity of the detector as a function of the position of the source on the sky for circularly polarized GWs. 18 2.4 Noise contributions to the total design sensitivity of Advanced LIGO in terms of sensitivity to gravitational-wave strain ℎ C . 21 ( ) 2.5 Sensitivity of the GW detector enhanced with squeezed light. 28 3.1 Effect of squeezing on quantum noise in the electromagnetic field for coherent field, phase squeezed state and amplitude squeezed state. 46 3.2 Schematic of a homodyne detector. 52 3.3 Sensing the motion of a mirror with light. 55 3.4 Comparison of effects of variational readout and frequency-dependent squeezing on quantum noise in GW detectors.
    [Show full text]