OUTLINE of EARLY HISTORY of COLORADO RIVER DEVELOPMENT
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Riverside East
1 9.4 RIVERSIDE EAST 2 3 4 9.4.1 Background and Summary of Impacts 5 6 7 9.4.1.1 General Information 8 9 The proposed Riverside East SEZ is the largest of the proposed SEZs in the six-state 10 study area, with a total area of 202,896 acres (821 km2). The SEZ spans a distance of about 11 45 mi (72 km) between the points farthest west and east, but it has an irregular shape with a large 12 excluded central area (see Figure 9.4.1.1-1). The eastern boundary of the site is about 6 mi 13 (10 km) west of the Arizona border. The western boundary abuts and surrounds a portion of 14 Joshua Tree National Park. The nearest towns with populations greater than 10,000 are Blythe, 15 located about 6 mi (10 km) southeast of the SEZ with a 2008 population of 21,727; and Indio, 16 located about 45 mi (72 km) west of the SEZ on I-10, with a 2008 population of 84,443. The 17 small town of Desert Center (2000 population of 150) is located at the far southwestern edge of 18 the SEZ, along I-10. 19 20 The SEZ is located in Riverside County in southeastern California. In 2008, the county 21 population was 84,443. The closest large cities are Moreno Valley, San Bernardino, and 22 Riverside (all located slightly more than 100 mi [161 km] west of the SEZ on I-10. The Interstate 23 runs east–west along the southern boundary of the SEZ. -
The Salton Sea Region, California
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR HUBERT WORK, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 497 THE SALTON SEA REGION, CALIFORNIA A GEOGEAPHIC, GEOLOGIC, AND HTDEOLOGIC EECONNAISSANCE WITH A GUIDE TO DESEET WATEEING PLACES BY JOHN S. BROWN Prepared in cooperation with the DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1923 ADDITIONAL COPIES Or THIS PUBLICATION MAT BE PBOCUBED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OV DOCUMENTS GOVEBNMENT PEINTINO OFFICE WASHINQTON, D. C. AT 60 CENTS PER COPY PUECHASEE AQEEES NOT TO EESELL OB DISTRIBUTE THIS COPT FOB PBOFTT. PUB. EES. 57, APPBOVED MAT 11, 1922 n CONTENTS. Fact. Preface, by 0. E. Meinzer................................................ xi Introduction......................... .................................... 1 Methods and scope of work............................................. 1 Acknowledgments.......................................... .......... 2 Oeneral features of the region............................................. 2 Location............................................................. 2 Name................................................................ 2 History.............................................................. 3 Early Spanish exploration and development........................ 3 Later explorations................................................ 4 Gold seekers..................................................... 5 Pacifier Railroad explorations..................................... 5 Colorado River -
Routes to Desert Watering Places in the Salton Sea Region, California
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JOHN BARTON PAYNE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 490 A ROUTES TO DESERT WATERING PLACES IN THE SALTON SEA REGION, CALIFORNIA BY JOHN S. BROWN WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT FEINTING OFFICE 1920 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JOHN BARTON PAYNE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 490 A ROUTES TO DESERT WATERING PLACES IN THE SALTON SEA REGION, CALIFORNIA BY JOHN S. BROWN Prepared in cooperation with the DEPARTMENT OP ENGINEERING OP THE STATE OP CALIFORNIA WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1920 CONTENTS. Page. Preface, by O. E. Meinzer________________^___________ 1 Introduction_______________________________________ 5 Location of the region______________________________ 5 Scope of the report_______________________________ 5 Methods of field work__________________,_________ 5 Explanation of maps_____________________________ 6 Acknowledgments_______________________________ 7 Description of the region______________________________ 7 Physical features ______________________ 7 Settlements ________________________ 7 Roads___ -______________________- 8 Means of travel ________________________ 8 Suggestions to travelers _ _____________________ 8 General advice ___________ __ - 8 Teams, hay, and grain _______ __ 9 Special suggestions to motorists________________________ 10 Provisions__ _ _______________________ 11 Clothing and bedding______________________________ 12 Fuel______________-.__________________________ 12 Water______________________________________ -
Countywide Water and Wastewater Municipal Service Review
Countywide Water and Wastewater Municipal Service Review Riverside Local Agency Formation Commission LAFCO 2019-01-1,2,3,4,5 Volume 3 Coachella Valley/Eastern Region Water and Wastewater Agencies City of Blythe, City of Coachella, City of Indio, City of Palm Springs, Chiriaco Summit County Water District, Coachella Valley Water District, Desert Water Agency, Imperial Irrigation District, Mission Springs Water District, Palo Verde Irrigation, Valley Sanitary District, County Service Area 51 (Desert Center/Lake Tamarisk), County Service Area 62 (Ripley), and County Service Area 122 (Mesa Verde) i Prepared For: Riverside Local Agency Formation Commission ___________________________________________________________ COMMISSIONERS Phil Williams, Special District Member Stephen Tomanelli, Vice Chair, Public Member Kevin Jeffries, County Member Jeff Hewitt, County Member Michael M. Vargas, City Member Steve Sanchez, Chair, City Member Nancy Wright, Special District Member ALTERNATE MEMBERS Randon Lane, City Member V. Manuel Perez, County Member Jim Love, Public Member STAFF Crystal Craig, Interim Executive Officer ii Countywide Water and Wastewater Municipal Service Review Volume 3 Riverside Local Agency Formation Commission Coachella Valley/Eastern Region Water and Wastewater Agencies Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................ vi 1. Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................. -
Compliance Archaeology Has Tended to Focus on Specific Locations of Sites, While the Broader Landscape of Traditional Use Areas
ARCHAEOLOGICAL TRAILS AND ETHNOGRAPHIC TRAILS: CAN THEY MEET? RUTH ARLENE MUSSER-LOPEZ ARCHAEOLOGICAL HERITAGE ASSOCIATES (RIVER AHA) STEVE MILLER BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, LAKE HAVASU FIELD OFFICE Compliance archaeology has tended to focus on specific locations of sites, while the broader landscape of traditional use areas, travel corridors, and places named in tradition is often overlooked. An opportunity for landscape-level analysis presented itself in a proposed large Off Highway Vehicle (OHV) open area adjacent to the Colorado River. While a continuous Salt Song Trail may not be physically manifest, researchers found evidence of a corridor including trail segments, stacked rock features (“prayer shrines”), and short-term camps. When taken into consideration with prehistoric events and places named in ethnographies and current traditional practices, these fragmented segments may be components of the Salt Song Trail. The Salt Song Trail and other ethnographic trails in the Mojave Desert are elements of very large- scale ethnographic landscapes. These landscapes include the land, its springs, passes, and notable peaks; the fossil traces of human behavior ranging from stone tool manufacture, sheltering, and ceremony; and the empirically observable tread or alignment of the trail itself (Figure 1). The difficulty lies in linking, or attempting to link, archaeological observations characterized by very specific locations to named ethnographic trails, which in most cases have only generalized provenience and which, in some cases, may not have an actual physical referent. The purpose of this paper is to share tentative findings of recent fieldwork in Standard Basin, Arizona, a large drainage situated on the eastern side of the Colorado River south of Lake Havasu City. -
WIVG05119.Pdf (788.8Kb)
.' . 2-28-7~ OUTLINE HISTORY OF COLORADO RIVER DEVELOPMENT by Ival V. Goslin I 0 Introduction The history of the development of the Colorado River should read like a novel. Certainly such a history has all the elements of a heart-rending story--tragedy, pathos, comedy, romance, and human interest. An outline, such as this paper must be, will lack the qualities of a novel, yet it is hoped that part of the events enumerated will serve as a background for understanding the influences that have led to present conditions and for analyzing the consequences and relative values of alternative choices with respect to future development. A word of caution is offered. This paper has been prepared from the viewpoint of the author who has spent over 21 years on Colorado River prob lems. The events selected to outline the historical development of the river naturally reflect his biases as well as his judgment. Many other events of historical significance could have been included, and another writer may have placed different emphasis or other interpretations on certain parts of the material discussed. II. Exploration - Navigation A. Early Explorers Navigation was the first use made of the lower mainstem of the Colo rado River by white men. l / As early as 1539, Ulloa, exploring what was believed to be a strait, sailed to the head of the Gulf of California. He noted the turbid condition of the water, and guessed that a great river entered 11 The earliest explorers were Spanish. Of a large number, Ulloa, Alarcon, Diaz, Coronado, Cardenas, and Onate appear to be the most out standing in bringing knowledge to the world about the lower Colorado River.