WIVG05119.Pdf (788.8Kb)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Riverside East
1 9.4 RIVERSIDE EAST 2 3 4 9.4.1 Background and Summary of Impacts 5 6 7 9.4.1.1 General Information 8 9 The proposed Riverside East SEZ is the largest of the proposed SEZs in the six-state 10 study area, with a total area of 202,896 acres (821 km2). The SEZ spans a distance of about 11 45 mi (72 km) between the points farthest west and east, but it has an irregular shape with a large 12 excluded central area (see Figure 9.4.1.1-1). The eastern boundary of the site is about 6 mi 13 (10 km) west of the Arizona border. The western boundary abuts and surrounds a portion of 14 Joshua Tree National Park. The nearest towns with populations greater than 10,000 are Blythe, 15 located about 6 mi (10 km) southeast of the SEZ with a 2008 population of 21,727; and Indio, 16 located about 45 mi (72 km) west of the SEZ on I-10, with a 2008 population of 84,443. The 17 small town of Desert Center (2000 population of 150) is located at the far southwestern edge of 18 the SEZ, along I-10. 19 20 The SEZ is located in Riverside County in southeastern California. In 2008, the county 21 population was 84,443. The closest large cities are Moreno Valley, San Bernardino, and 22 Riverside (all located slightly more than 100 mi [161 km] west of the SEZ on I-10. The Interstate 23 runs east–west along the southern boundary of the SEZ. -
The Salton Sea Region, California
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR HUBERT WORK, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 497 THE SALTON SEA REGION, CALIFORNIA A GEOGEAPHIC, GEOLOGIC, AND HTDEOLOGIC EECONNAISSANCE WITH A GUIDE TO DESEET WATEEING PLACES BY JOHN S. BROWN Prepared in cooperation with the DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1923 ADDITIONAL COPIES Or THIS PUBLICATION MAT BE PBOCUBED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OV DOCUMENTS GOVEBNMENT PEINTINO OFFICE WASHINQTON, D. C. AT 60 CENTS PER COPY PUECHASEE AQEEES NOT TO EESELL OB DISTRIBUTE THIS COPT FOB PBOFTT. PUB. EES. 57, APPBOVED MAT 11, 1922 n CONTENTS. Fact. Preface, by 0. E. Meinzer................................................ xi Introduction......................... .................................... 1 Methods and scope of work............................................. 1 Acknowledgments.......................................... .......... 2 Oeneral features of the region............................................. 2 Location............................................................. 2 Name................................................................ 2 History.............................................................. 3 Early Spanish exploration and development........................ 3 Later explorations................................................ 4 Gold seekers..................................................... 5 Pacifier Railroad explorations..................................... 5 Colorado River -
Routes to Desert Watering Places in the Salton Sea Region, California
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JOHN BARTON PAYNE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 490 A ROUTES TO DESERT WATERING PLACES IN THE SALTON SEA REGION, CALIFORNIA BY JOHN S. BROWN WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT FEINTING OFFICE 1920 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JOHN BARTON PAYNE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 490 A ROUTES TO DESERT WATERING PLACES IN THE SALTON SEA REGION, CALIFORNIA BY JOHN S. BROWN Prepared in cooperation with the DEPARTMENT OP ENGINEERING OP THE STATE OP CALIFORNIA WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1920 CONTENTS. Page. Preface, by O. E. Meinzer________________^___________ 1 Introduction_______________________________________ 5 Location of the region______________________________ 5 Scope of the report_______________________________ 5 Methods of field work__________________,_________ 5 Explanation of maps_____________________________ 6 Acknowledgments_______________________________ 7 Description of the region______________________________ 7 Physical features ______________________ 7 Settlements ________________________ 7 Roads___ -______________________- 8 Means of travel ________________________ 8 Suggestions to travelers _ _____________________ 8 General advice ___________ __ - 8 Teams, hay, and grain _______ __ 9 Special suggestions to motorists________________________ 10 Provisions__ _ _______________________ 11 Clothing and bedding______________________________ 12 Fuel______________-.__________________________ 12 Water______________________________________ -
Countywide Water and Wastewater Municipal Service Review
Countywide Water and Wastewater Municipal Service Review Riverside Local Agency Formation Commission LAFCO 2019-01-1,2,3,4,5 Volume 3 Coachella Valley/Eastern Region Water and Wastewater Agencies City of Blythe, City of Coachella, City of Indio, City of Palm Springs, Chiriaco Summit County Water District, Coachella Valley Water District, Desert Water Agency, Imperial Irrigation District, Mission Springs Water District, Palo Verde Irrigation, Valley Sanitary District, County Service Area 51 (Desert Center/Lake Tamarisk), County Service Area 62 (Ripley), and County Service Area 122 (Mesa Verde) i Prepared For: Riverside Local Agency Formation Commission ___________________________________________________________ COMMISSIONERS Phil Williams, Special District Member Stephen Tomanelli, Vice Chair, Public Member Kevin Jeffries, County Member Jeff Hewitt, County Member Michael M. Vargas, City Member Steve Sanchez, Chair, City Member Nancy Wright, Special District Member ALTERNATE MEMBERS Randon Lane, City Member V. Manuel Perez, County Member Jim Love, Public Member STAFF Crystal Craig, Interim Executive Officer ii Countywide Water and Wastewater Municipal Service Review Volume 3 Riverside Local Agency Formation Commission Coachella Valley/Eastern Region Water and Wastewater Agencies Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................ vi 1. Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................. -
Compliance Archaeology Has Tended to Focus on Specific Locations of Sites, While the Broader Landscape of Traditional Use Areas
ARCHAEOLOGICAL TRAILS AND ETHNOGRAPHIC TRAILS: CAN THEY MEET? RUTH ARLENE MUSSER-LOPEZ ARCHAEOLOGICAL HERITAGE ASSOCIATES (RIVER AHA) STEVE MILLER BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, LAKE HAVASU FIELD OFFICE Compliance archaeology has tended to focus on specific locations of sites, while the broader landscape of traditional use areas, travel corridors, and places named in tradition is often overlooked. An opportunity for landscape-level analysis presented itself in a proposed large Off Highway Vehicle (OHV) open area adjacent to the Colorado River. While a continuous Salt Song Trail may not be physically manifest, researchers found evidence of a corridor including trail segments, stacked rock features (“prayer shrines”), and short-term camps. When taken into consideration with prehistoric events and places named in ethnographies and current traditional practices, these fragmented segments may be components of the Salt Song Trail. The Salt Song Trail and other ethnographic trails in the Mojave Desert are elements of very large- scale ethnographic landscapes. These landscapes include the land, its springs, passes, and notable peaks; the fossil traces of human behavior ranging from stone tool manufacture, sheltering, and ceremony; and the empirically observable tread or alignment of the trail itself (Figure 1). The difficulty lies in linking, or attempting to link, archaeological observations characterized by very specific locations to named ethnographic trails, which in most cases have only generalized provenience and which, in some cases, may not have an actual physical referent. The purpose of this paper is to share tentative findings of recent fieldwork in Standard Basin, Arizona, a large drainage situated on the eastern side of the Colorado River south of Lake Havasu City. -
OUTLINE of EARLY HISTORY of COLORADO RIVER DEVELOPMENT
( \. OUTLINE of EARLY HISTORY OF COLORADO RIVER DEVELOPMENT IvaI V. Goslin Executive Director Upper Colorado River Commission Colorado Water Summer. Workshop sponsored by Department of History Western State College and Colorado Water Congress July 20, 1976 o SALT lA*'E CITY ",,, COLORADO RIVER BASIN UPPER COLORADO RiVER COMMISSION f974 OUTLINE of EARLY HISTORY OF COLORADO RIVER DEVELOPMENT I. Introduction As my part of this presentation on "The Colorado River Compact of 1922 and Related Compacts and Treaties, I' Mr. Sparks and I decided upon what we believe is a logical division of the subject matter in order to avoid too much repetition and at the same time cover as broad a spectrum as possible within the allotted time. Here is what we are going to try to do. Because this Colorado Water Summer Workshop -is sponsored by the De partment of History of Western State College as well as by the Colorado Water Congress, I am going to try in a somewhat sketchy outline form to portray for you 'some of the early history of development of the water resources of the Colorado River Basin in order that you may better under stand what has happened in the past, and how we have arrived at our present state of precarious confusion. It is hoped that alTIOng the events cited there will be those that will serve as a background for understanding the influences that have led to present conditions, and for your analysis of the relative values of alternative choices with respect to future develop ment. After I have attempted to bolster your knowledge of the evolution of what we call the "law of the river" which is comprised of numerous compacts, subcompacts, laws, court decrees, operating principles, and an international treaty, Mr.