DOCSLIB.ORG

Tem and Ter Master Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ECE ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE TEM and TER revised Master Plan - TEM and TER revised Final Report - Volume I: Main text Final Report - Volume Master Plan Final Report Volume I: Main text Trans-European Motorway (TEM) Trans-European Railway (TER) Projects United Nations 2011 Printed by the Publishing Service, United Nations, Geneva — GE.12.20689 — February 2012 — ECE/TRANS/183/Rev.2 (Vol. I) ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Trans-European Motorway (TEM) project Trans-European Railway (TER) project TEM and TER revised Master Plan Final report Volume I : Main text UNITED NATIONS New York and Geneva, 2011 1 UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN – 2011 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The revised Master Plan of the Trans-European Motorway (TEM) and Trans-European Railway (TEM) projects was completed thanks to the work and contributions of National Coordinators and country experts from participating TEM and TER member countries, without whose commitment and input this revision would not have been possible; the TEM and TER Project Manager — Mr. Helmut Meelich; the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe as the executing agency of the projects; the consultants Mr. Petr Pospisil, Mr. Romeo Galbenu and Mr. Darek Przybyla, as well as experts from observer and other participating countries, whose valuable input enlarged the scope of the revised Master Plan. ECE/TRANS/183/Rev.2(Vol. I) 2 ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface .............................................................................................................. 7 Executive summary .............................................................................................. 9 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 15 1. REVISION OF THE TEM AND TER MASTER PLAN ........................................... 17 2. REVISED TEM AND TER MASTER PLAN BACKBONE NETWORKS ................. 21 2.1 Revised TEM Master Plan backbone network ................................................. 22 2.2 Revised TER Master Plan backbone network .................................................. 26 3. COMPARISON OF THE MASTER PLAN BACKBONE NETWORKS WITH OTHER INTERNATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE NETWORKS ............................. 33 3.1 TEM backbone network .............................................................................. 34 3.2 TER backbone network ............................................................................... 43 3.3 Summary .................................................................................................. 52 4. MISSING LINKS IN THE BACKBONE NETWORKS ......................................... 53 4.1 Motorway and road missing links incorporated in the revised TEM backbone network .................................................................................................... 53 4.2 Railway missing links incorporated in the revised TER backbone network .......... 55 4.3 Other motorway and road missing links ....................................................... 57 4.4 Other railway missing links ......................................................................... 57 5. UPDATING OF THE TRAFFIC FORECAST FOR THE BACKBONE NETWORKS ..................................................................................................... 59 5.1 Past development ....................................................................................... 59 5.2 Traffic forecast for the TEM and TER Master Plan ........................................... 60 5.3 Other recent forecasts ................................................................................ 63 5.4 Comparison of existing forecast results ......................................................... 68 5.5 Questionnaires for the revision of the TEM and TER Master Plan ...................... 68 5.6 The influence of the global economic crisis on road and rail traffic developments in 2008 and 2009 .................................................................................... 69 5.7 Groups of countries .................................................................................... 75 5.8 Basic development scenario ........................................................................ 75 5.9 Post-crisis development scenarios ................................................................. 77 5.10. Maps of road and rail traffic flows in 2020 .................................................. 79 6. REVISED MASTER PLAN PROJECTS ................................................................ 81 6.1 Overview ................................................................................................. 81 6.2 Motorway/road projects in the revised Master Plan ....................................... 83 6.3 Railway projects in the revised Master Plan ................................................... 99 6.4 Analysis of projects and their classification ................................................... 111 7. FUNDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR REVISED MASTER PLAN PROJECTS........ 113 3 UNECE TEM AND TER PROJECTS’ MASTER PLAN – 2011 8. STATUS OF BACKBONE NETWORKS IN 2010, 2015 AND 2020 ................ 115 8.1 Status maps of the TEM and TER backbone network ....................................... 115 8.2 Lessons learnt ............................................................................................ 115 8.3 Conclusions .............................................................................................. 116 9. BOTTLENECKS ON BACKBONE NETWORKS ................................................. 119 9.1 Definition and identification ........................................................................ 119 9.2 Roads ...................................................................................................... 122 9.3 Railways ................................................................................................... 124 10. BORDER CROSSING ISSUES ........................................................................... 177 10.1 Road border crossings on the TEM backbone network .................................... 177 10.2 Railway border crossings of importance for international combined transport according to the AGTC (European Agreement on Important International Combined Transport Lines and Related Installations) ....................................... 180 10.3 Other railway border crossings on the TER backbone network ......................... 182 10.4 Border crossing traffic ................................................................................ 183 10.5 Border crossing barriers and problems ......................................................... 184 10.6 Solutions and remedial measures ................................................................. 186 11. INTERRELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN THE REVISED TER AND TEM BACK- BONE NETWORKS AND RELEVANT TRANSHIPMENT POINTS ...................... 189 11.1 Common sections of revised TEM and TER backbone networks ........................ 189 11.2 Terminals of importance for international combined transport .......................... 192 11.3 Other terminals of importance for international combined transport linked to the revised TEM and TER backbone networks ..................................................... 197 11.4 Ferry links/ports forming part of the international combined transport network .. 200 11.5 Other ferry links of high importance linked to the TEM and TER revised backbone networks ................................................................................................... 201 11.6 Other sea ports of high importance linked to the revised TEM and TER backbone networks ................................................................................................... 201 11.7 Terminals in inland waterway ports of importance for international combined transport linked to the revised TEM and TER backbone networks ...................... 202 11.8 Other river/lake ports of high importance linked to the revised TEM and TER backbone networks .................................................................................... 204 12. INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS ................................................................ 207 12.1 ITS in the road sector ................................................................................. 207 12.2 ITS in the rail sector ................................................................................... 208 12.3 Motorway/road ITS systems and services in the participating countries ............ 208 12.4 Rail ITS systems and services in the participating countries .............................. 210 13. ENVIRONMENTAL, SAFETY AND SECURITY ISSUES ......................................... 213 13.1 Environmental impacts ................................................................................ 213 13.2 Road safety ............................................................................................... 217 13.3 Transport security ....................................................................................... 220 14. CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................... 225 4 ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE LIST OF MAPS 1. TEM and TER Master Plan Revision participating countries .............................. 129 2. TEM Master Plan Revision backbone network ................................................ 131 3. TER Master Plan Revision backbone network ................................................
Recommended publications
  • Turistična Naloga: ČUDEŽNE OGNJENE KROGLE

    Turistična Naloga: ČUDEŽNE OGNJENE KROGLE

    OSNOVNA ŠOLA PREŽIHOVEGA VORANCA JESENICE Cesta Toneta Tomšiča 5, 4270 JESENICE Tel: 04 581 15 00 Fax: 04 586 31 74 E-naslov: [email protected] Turistična naloga: ČUDEŽNE OGNJENE KROGLE Avtorji: Kaja Magovac, 7.r Domen Lukan, 7.r Aljaž Lukan, 7.r Kris Horvat, 7.r Ajdin Mujić, 7.r Julijan Stojanović, 7.r Mentorica: Hermina Biščević, področna svetovalka II Jesenice, januar 2015 POVZETEK: Namen predlaganega turističnega produkta je turističnim ponudnikom in Občini Jesenice predstaviti, da bi lahko bila tudi zgodba o jeseniškem meteoritu za goste zanimiva in vredna ogleda. Ker zgodba še ni oblikovana kot celovit turistični produkt, bi lahko bil naš predlog programa dvodnevnega tabora idejna zasnova, pri oblikovanju predlogov za razvoj turizma na Jesenicah. Cilj naloge je oblikovati program aktivnosti v dvodnevnem izletu, ki vsebuje nastanitev v taboru, spoznavanje naravnih znamenitosti in kulturne dediščine našega kraja, pokušino tradicionalnih jedi, rekreacijo in umetniško ustvarjanje. V nalogi predstavljamo tudi načine trženja ponudbe od tiskanih medijev do digitalnih medijev, ki so za današnji čas velikega pomena. Za uspešno trženje in reklamiranje bo potrebno vključiti lokalne turistične delavce, občino in zasebne podjetnike, saj edino s skupnimi močmi lahko z zgodbo o jeseniškem meteoritu privabimo največ gostov. Ključne besede: Zgodba, turistični produkt, trženje ABSTRAKT: The purpose of tourism product is to present tourism providers and the municipality of Jesenice, that the story of Jesenice meteorite could be interesting for our tourist guests and worth a visit. Because our proposal of the story is not designed as an integrated tourist product, it could be conceptual design for the development of tourism in Jesenice.
  • Operativnim Program Odvajanja in Čiščenja Komunalnih Odpadnih Voda Za Občino Jesenice

    Operativnim Program Odvajanja in Čiščenja Komunalnih Odpadnih Voda Za Občino Jesenice

    OB ČINA JESENICE Cesta železarjev 6 4270 Jesenice OPERATIVNI PROGRAM ODVAJANJA IN ČIŠ ČENJA KOMUNALNIH ODPADNIH VOD ZA OB ČINO JESENICE (za obdobje od 2011 do 2017 s poudarkom na ukrepih programa, ki bodo izvedeni do 31.decembra 2014) Operativni program odvajanja in čiš čenja odpadnih vod v Ob čini Jesenice Stran 1/28 VSEBINA: 1. UVOD.................................................................................................................. 3 1.1. Obrazložitev in umestitev vsebine operativnega programa........................... 3 1.2. Spremljanje in ocena izvajanja operativnega programa................................ 5 2. ANALIZA STANJA ............................................................................................. 5 2.1. Obmo čje ob čine ............................................................................................ 5 2.2. Pokritost obmo čja ob čine s kanalizacijo in čistilnimi napravami.................... 8 2.3. Podatki o katastru in drugih evidencah, ki pokrivajo podro čja odvajanja in čiš čenja odpadnih vod................................................................................. 13 2.4. Organiziranost javne službe........................................................................ 13 2.5. Predpisi ob čine............................................................................................ 14 2.6. Cenovna politika na podro čju odvajanja in čiš čenja komunalnih odpadnih in padavinskih vod .........................................................................................
  • A Captive Island Kaliningrad Between MOSCOW and the EU

    A Captive Island Kaliningrad Between MOSCOW and the EU

    41 A CAPTIVE ISLAND KAlInIngRAD bETWEEn MOSCOW AnD ThE EU Jadwiga Rogoża, Agata Wierzbowska-Miazga, Iwona Wiśniewska NUMBER 41 WARSAW JULY 2012 A CAPTIVE ISLAND KALININGRAD BETWEEN MOSCOW AND THE EU Jadwiga Rogoża, Agata Wierzbowska-Miazga, Iwona Wiśniewska © Copyright by Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia / Centre for Eastern Studies CONTENT EDITORS Adam Eberhardt, Marek Menkiszak EDITORS Katarzyna Kazimierska, Anna Łabuszewska TRANSLATION Ilona Duchnowicz CO-OPERATION Jim Todd GRAPHIC DESIGN PARA-BUCH CHARTS, MAP, PHOTOGRAPH ON COVER Wojciech Mańkowski DTP GroupMedia PuBLISHER Ośrodek Studiów Wschodnich im. Marka Karpia Centre for Eastern Studies ul. Koszykowa 6a, Warsaw, Poland Phone + 48 /22/ 525 80 00 Fax: + 48 /22/ 525 80 40 osw.waw.pl ISBN 978–83–62936–13–7 Contents KEY POINTS /5 INTRODUCTION /8 I. KALININGRAD OBLAST: A SUBJECT OR AN OBJECT OF THE F EDERATION? /9 1. THE AMBER ISLAND: Kaliningrad today /9 1.1. Kaliningrad in the legal, political and economic space of the Russian Federation /9 1.2. Current political situation /13 1.3. The current economic situation /17 1.4. The social situation /24 1.5. Characteristics of the Kaliningrad residents /27 1.6. The ecological situation /32 2. AN AREA UNDER SPECIAL SURVEILLANCE: Moscow’s policy towards the region /34 2.1. The policy of compensating for Kaliningrad’s location as an exclave /34 2.2. The policy of reinforcing social ties with the rest of Russia /43 2.3. The policy of restricted access for foreign partners to the region /45 2.4. The policy of controlling the region’s co-operation with other countries /47 3.
  • Подкласс Exogenia Collin, 1912

    Подкласс Exogenia Collin, 1912

    Research Article ISSN 2336-9744 (online) | ISSN 2337-0173 (print) The journal is available on line at www.ecol-mne.com Contribution to the knowledge of distribution of Colubrid snakes in Serbia LJILJANA TOMOVIĆ1,2,4*, ALEKSANDAR UROŠEVIĆ2,4, RASTKO AJTIĆ3,4, IMRE KRIZMANIĆ1, ALEKSANDAR SIMOVIĆ4, NENAD LABUS5, DANKO JOVIĆ6, MILIVOJ KRSTIĆ4, SONJA ĐORĐEVIĆ1,4, MARKO ANĐELKOVIĆ2,4, ANA GOLUBOVIĆ1,4 & GEORG DŽUKIĆ2 1 University of Belgrade, Faculty of Biology, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 2 University of Belgrade, Institute for Biological Research “Siniša Stanković”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 3 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Dr Ivana Ribara 91, 11070 Belgrade, Serbia 4 Serbian Herpetological Society “Milutin Radovanović”, Bulevar despota Stefana 142, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia 5 University of Priština, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Biology Department, Lole Ribara 29, 38220 Kosovska Mitrovica, Serbia 6 Institute for Nature Conservation of Serbia, Vožda Karađorđa 14, 18000 Niš, Serbia *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Received 28 March 2015 │ Accepted 31 March 2015 │ Published online 6 April 2015. Abstract Detailed distribution pattern of colubrid snakes in Serbia is still inadequately described, despite the long historical study. In this paper, we provide accurate distribution of seven species, with previously published and newly accumulated faunistic records compiled. Comparative analysis of faunas among all Balkan countries showed that Serbian colubrid fauna is among the most distinct (together with faunas of Slovenia and Romania), due to small number of species. Zoogeographic analysis showed high chorotype diversity of Serbian colubrids: seven species belong to six chorotypes. South-eastern Serbia (Pčinja River valley) is characterized by the presence of all colubrid species inhabiting our country, and deserves the highest conservation status at the national level.
  • The People's Republic of China Connecting Europe

    The People's Republic of China Connecting Europe

    ADBI Working Paper Series THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA CONNECTING EUROPE? Julia Gruebler No. 1178 August 2020 Asian Development Bank Institute Julia Gruebler is an economist at the Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies (wiiw) and a lecturer at the Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna, Austria. The views expressed in this paper are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of ADBI, ADB, its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms. Working papers are subject to formal revision and correction before they are finalized and considered published. The Working Paper series is a continuation of the formerly named Discussion Paper series; the numbering of the papers continued without interruption or change. ADBI’s working papers reflect initial ideas on a topic and are posted online for discussion. Some working papers may develop into other forms of publication. The Asian Development Bank refers to “China” as the People’s Republic of China. Suggested citation: Gruebler, J. 2020. The People’s Republic of China Connecting Europe? ADBI Working Paper 1178. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. Available: https://www.adb.org/publications/prc-connecting-europe Please contact the authors for information about this paper. Email: [email protected] The author has greatly benefited from previous work at wiiw, in particular, research conducted together with Robert Stehrer, Scientific Director at wiiw.
  • The Ecological State of the Raw Material Zone of the Enterprises Supplying Beef for Baby Food

    The Ecological State of the Raw Material Zone of the Enterprises Supplying Beef for Baby Food

    E3S Web of Conferences 210, 06004 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021006004 ITSE-2020 The ecological state of the raw material zone of the enterprises supplying beef for baby food Nikolay Zabashta1,*, Elena Golovko1, Irina Sinelshchikova1, and Anastasia Androsova 1Department of Toxicology and Feed Quality, Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution Krasnodar Research Centre for Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 4, Pervomayskaya Street, 350055, Krasnodar, Russian Federation Abstract. Subjects of the research: soils, pasture and cultivated plants, vegetable raw materials, prepared feed of the raw material zone of the Branch of the Tikhoretsky Children's Meat Canning Plant of DANON- RUSSIA JSC. The quantitative content of mobile forms of heavy metals in soils under the main feed crops and their accumulation in finished feeds was determined. The a soil with a high humus content cover in the area of the surveyed farms is mainly represented by carbonate weakly humus heavy-duty “chernozem”, which occupies 82.5 % of all land. Fodder raw materials in the autumn-winter season 2019-2020 is safe in quantitative content regulated by standards of elements of heavy metals. Their contents were established: mercury ≤ 0.01 mg / kg, cadmium ≤ 0.2 mg / kg, lead ≤ 2.0 mg / kg and arsenic ≤ 0.5 mg / kg. However, there was an insignificant (1-2%) increase in the zinc content in the silage from the green mass of corn and haylage from the green mass of alfalfa. It was established that the remains of the prohibited pesticides are in trace amounts or practically absent in the feed of the raw material zone.
  • National Threat Assessment 2021

    National Threat Assessment 2021

    DEFENCE INTELLIGENCE STATE SECURITY AND SECURITY DEPARTMENT OF SERVICE UNDER THE REPUBLIC OF THE MINISTRY OF LITHUANIA NATIONAL DEFENCE NATIONAL THREAT ASSESSMENT 2021 DEFENCE INTELLIGENCE STATE SECURITY AND SECURITY DEPARTMENT OF SERVICE UNDER THE REPUBLIC OF THE MINISTRY OF LITHUANIA NATIONAL DEFENCE NATIONAL THREAT ASSESSMENT 2021 VILNIUS, 2021 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 3 FOREWORD 5 SUMMARY 8 NEW SECURITY CHALLENGES 12 REGIONAL SECURITY 17 MILITARY SECURITY 27 ACTIVITIES OF HOSTILE INTELLIGENCE AND SECURITY SERVICES 41 PROTECTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL ORDER 50 INFORMATION SECURITY 54 ECONOMIC AND ENERGY SECURITY 61 TERRORISM AND GLOBAL SECURITY 67 3 INTRODUCTION The National Threat Assessment by the State Security Department of the Republic of Lithuania (VSD) and the Defence Intelligence and Security Service under the Ministry of National Defence of the Republic of Lithuania (AOTD) is presented to the public in accordance with Articles 8 and 26 of the Law on Intelligence of the Republic of Lithuania. The document provides consolidated, unclassified assessment of threats and risks to national security of the Repub- lic of Lithuania prepared by both intelligence services. The document assesses events, processes and trends that correspond to the intelligence requirements approved by the State Defence Council. Based on them and considering the long-term trends affecting national security, the document provides the assessment of major challenges that the Lithuanian national security is to face in the near term (2021–2022). The assessments of long-term
  • Committee on Regional Development the Secretariat

    Committee on Regional Development the Secretariat

    COMMITTEE ON REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT THE SECRETARIAT October 2008 REPORT of the Committee on Regional Development's Delegation to Bulgaria from 30 September to 2 October 2008 European Parliament - Committee on Regional Development - The Secretariat SUMMARY Visit to Bulgaria to meet with Government Ministers and officials as well as the leaders of local administrations responsible for regional Subject development projects. Under the 2006 regulations the whole of Bulgaria qualifies for assistance under the Convergence objective. The field missions had the following main objectives: - To discuss with Ministers, relevant officials and local authorities the future implementation of the Regional development Operational Programme and sectoral programmes as well as to discuss with them any problems they may have. Main objectives - To acquaint members of the delegation with the specific problems of Bulgaria and see in situ some successful projects executed with pre-accession funds and discuss the implementation of operational programmes which are just starting up. Date 30 September to 02 October 2008 Sofia, Gorna Orjahovica, Arbanasi, Balchik, Varna Places Chairman Gerardo Galleote, Chair of the Regional Development Committee. The list of participants is attached in the annex. 2 of 11 European Parliament - Committee on Regional Development - The Secretariat BACKGROUND On the initiative of the Bulgarian Vice President of the Committee on Regional Development Mr Evgeni KIRILOV (PSE), the committee decided to send a delegation to Bulgaria. It was the last out of three delegation trips of the REGI Committee scheduled for 2008. Bulgaria is of particular interest to the Members of the Regional Development Committee for a number of reasons: Together with Romania, Bulgaria is the first Balkan country to join the European Union in the latest phase of the ongoing enlargement process.
  • BR IFIC N° 2654 Index/Indice

    BR IFIC N° 2654 Index/Indice

    BR IFIC N° 2654 Index/Indice International Frequency Information Circular (Terrestrial Services) ITU - Radiocommunication Bureau Circular Internacional de Información sobre Frecuencias (Servicios Terrenales) UIT - Oficina de Radiocomunicaciones Circulaire Internationale d'Information sur les Fréquences (Services de Terre) UIT - Bureau des Radiocommunications Part 1 / Partie 1 / Parte 1 Date/Fecha 06.10.2009 Description of Columns Description des colonnes Descripción de columnas No. Sequential number Numéro séquenciel Número sequencial BR Id. BR identification number Numéro d'identification du BR Número de identificación de la BR Adm Notifying Administration Administration notificatrice Administración notificante 1A [MHz] Assigned frequency [MHz] Fréquence assignée [MHz] Frecuencia asignada [MHz] Name of the location of Nom de l'emplacement de Nombre del emplazamiento de 4A/5A transmitting / receiving station la station d'émission / réception estación transmisora / receptora 4B/5B Geographical area Zone géographique Zona geográfica 4C/5C Geographical coordinates Coordonnées géographiques Coordenadas geográficas 6A Class of station Classe de station Clase de estación Purpose of the notification: Objet de la notification: Propósito de la notificación: Intent ADD-addition MOD-modify ADD-ajouter MOD-modifier ADD-añadir MOD-modificar SUP-suppress W/D-withdraw SUP-supprimer W/D-retirer SUP-suprimir W/D-retirar No. BR Id Adm 1A [MHz] 4A/5A 4B/5B 4C/5C 6A Part Intent 1 109078651 ARG 7233.0000 PICHANAL ARG 64W13'34'' 23S19'09'' FX 1 ADD 2 109078654
  • Horizontal Issues and Legislative Procedures on 3Rd August, a Meeting of the Development Council Was Carried Out

    Horizontal Issues and Legislative Procedures on 3Rd August, a Meeting of the Development Council Was Carried Out

    Implementation of the Structural funds in Bulgaria Monthly brief, August-September 2011 Horizontal issues and legislative procedures On 3rd August, a meeting of the Development Council was carried out. There was a discussion on the priorities of the National Development Programme: Bulgaria 2020 (NDP), which were finally approved. On 20th September a meeting-discussion of the Inter-institutional Working group for the elaboration of the National Development Programme: Bulgaria 2020 was hold. The meeting included a presentation by an expert from the OECD, Mr. Jose Enrique Garcilazo, who presented some analytical findings of the publication Regional Outlook 2011, which provided important information that would be helpful in the process of preparation of the National Development Programme: Bulgaria 2020. On 27th September, a Round Table „From National Goals and Priorities of the National Development Programme: Bulgaria 2020 to Partnership Contract for Development and Investments 2014-2020” was hold in Sofia. A public discussion concerning the elaboration of the National Development Programme: Bulgaria 2020, its strategic goals and priorities, and the main areas of interventions, where the policy’ effects will be most important for the development of the country took place. The main participants of the academic society of the country were invited in the event and expressed their opinion on the process of preparation of the document. Regarding the financial corrections mechanism, a permanent interministerial work group for supporting the managing authorities will be established. The main tasks of the work group will be to discuss different cases where financial corrections will be imposed and to support methodologically the Managing Authorities regarding the process of imposing financial corrections under the OPs.
  • WP 2 Task 2.5-Report

    WP 2 Task 2.5-Report

    Project: BiG>East (EIE/07/214) Biogas purification and assessment of the natural gas grid in Southern and Eastern Europe Deliverable 2.5 Task 2.5 Mag. Heinz Praßl Ing. Gerhard Agrinz GmbH Emmerich-Assmann-Gasse 6 8430 Leibnitz, Austria Leibnitz, 23.06.2008 Elaborated with input of the BiG>East partners Krasin Georgiev, Denitsa Dimitrova, Biljana Kulisic, Konstantinos Sioulas, Ilze Dzene, Augustin Ofiteru, Mihai Adamescu, Florian Bodescu, Aleks Jan, and Dominik Rutz. With the support of: The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. It does not represent the opinion of the Community. The European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein Task 2.5 Report Index Foreword................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 6 2. Properties of the natural gas grid ....................................................................................... 6 2.1 Classification according to grid levels .......................................................................................... 6 2.2 Classification according to pressure levels.................................................................................. 7 2.2.1 Low pressure grid ....................................................................................................................................
  • REPUBLIKA HRVATSKA DRŽAVNI URED ZA REVIZIJU Područni Ured Rijeka

    REPUBLIKA HRVATSKA DRŽAVNI URED ZA REVIZIJU Područni Ured Rijeka

    REPUBLIKA HRVATSKA DRŽAVNI URED ZA REVIZIJU Područni ured Rijeka IZVJEŠĆE O OBAVLJENOJ REVIZIJI GOSPODARENJE OTPADOM NA PODRUČJU KARLOVAČKE ŽUPANIJE Rijeka, listopad 2014. S A D R Ž A J stranica PREDMET I CILJEVI REVIZIJE 2 METODE REVIZIJE 2 KRITERIJI ZA OCJENU UČINKOVITOSTI 3 GOSPODARENJE OTPADOM NA PODRUČJU KARLOVAČKE ŽUPANIJE 3 a) Izbjegavanje nastajanja i smanjivanje količine otpada na mjestu nastanka 4 - Planovi gospodarenja otpadom 4 - Sustav odvojenog prikupljanja otpada 7 b) Razvitak infrastrukture za izgradnju cjelovitog sustava gospodarenja otpadom 15 c) Smanjivanje rizika od otpada putem sanacije i zatvaranja odlagališta 17 d) Informacijski sustav gospodarenja otpadom 22 e) Edukacija o gospodarenju otpadom 24 f) Nadzor nad provedbom planova gospodarenja otpadom 25 OCJENA UČINKOVITOSTI GOSPODARENJA OTPADOM NA PODRUČJU KARLOVAČKE ŽUPANIJE 28 OČITOVANJE JEDINICA LOKALNE I PODRUČNE (REGIONALNE) SAMOUPRAVE 32 REPUBLIKA HRVATSKA DRŽAVNI URED ZA REVIZIJU Područni ured Rijeka KLASA: 041-01/13-10/30 URBROJ: 613-10-14-74 Rijeka, 14. listopada 2014. IZVJEŠĆE O OBAVLJENOJ REVIZIJI UČINKOVITOSTI GOSPODARENJA OTPADOM NA PODRUČJU KARLOVAČKE ŽUPANIJE Na temelju odredbi članaka 12. i 14. Zakona o Državnom uredu za reviziju (Narodne novine 80/11), Državni ured za reviziju je obavio reviziju učinkovitosti gospodarenja otpadom na području Karlovačke županije. Revizija je obavljena na način i prema postupcima utvrđenim okvirom revizijskih standarda Međunarodne organizacije vrhovnih revizijskih institucija (INTOSAI) i Kodeksom profesionalne etike državnih revizora. Postupci revizije su provedeni od 17. prosinca 2013. do 14. listopada 2014. Revizijom su obuhvaćene jedinice lokalne i područne (regionalne) samouprave Karlovačke županije(županija, pet gradova i 17općina), koje su utvrđene odredbama Zakona o područjima županija, gradova i općina u Republici Hrvatskoj (Narodne novine 86/06, 125/06, 16/07, 95/08, 46/10, 145/10, 37/13, 44/13 i 45/13).