Kenneth Robert Minogue: Published Works 1957-2013

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Kenneth Robert Minogue: Published Works 1957-2013 Kenneth Robert Minogue: Published works 1957-2013 1957 Review of Charles Parkin’s The Moral Basis of Burke’s Political Thought in Economica (May, 1957) 1958 ‘The Language of Comparative Politics’ in Political Studies (October, 1958) 1959 ‘Power in Politics’ in Political Studies (October, 1959) 1960 Review of: An Immortal Commonwealth: The Political Thought of James Harrington 1960 ‘The British Left: Innocent Part of the Guilty Whole’, The Twentieth Century Vol. 167 No. 998 (April 1960) Review: The Life and Opinions of Thomas Ernest Hulme by Alan R Jones in The London Magazine 7:10 (October, 1960), 67. ‘The Red Bowler Hat’; Short Story in British Millinery (December, 1960) 1961 ‘A Fable of Time and Class’ in The American Scholar (Spring, 1961). ‘How to Make Trends and Influence People’ in The American Scholar (Summer, 1961) 1962 Review of Bernard Crick’s In defense of Politics in The Australian Journal of Politics and History (1962) ‘The Modern Liberal’s Casebook’ in The American Scholar (Summer, 1962). ‘Portrait of a Politician: Macmillan among the Pink Mystics’ Beaver Book Supplement, Nov 1962. ‘A Christian Hobbes: Review of ‘The Divine Politics of Thomas Hobbes by F.C. Hood Spectator, March 1964 * 1963 ‘THE LIBERAL MIND’ (book) Review of two books by Maurice Cowling (Mill and Liberalism and The Nature and Limits of Political Science): in Philosophy (1963). Review of C. B Macpherson’s The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke (History, 1963). 1964 ‘De Gaulle Pense Donc Je Suis’ in The Journal of the Franco- British Society (Spring, 1964). ‘A Christian Hobbes’; review of F. C, Hood’s The Divine Politics of Thomas Hobbes in Spectator (April, 1964). * 1965 ‘How has Liberalism Affected Religion?’ in Aryan Path vol. xxxvi no. xii (December, 1965), 535. 1966 ‘Thomas Hobbes and the Philosophy of Absolutism’ in The New Thinkers Library of Political Ideas David Thomson (Watts:1966). 1967 NATIONALISM (Book) ‘Conservatism’; definition in Paul Edward’s The Encyclopedia of Philosophy (1967). ‘Nationalism: the poverty of a concept’. European Journal of Sociology Vol.8, Issue 2 (1967) ‘As the New LSE Term begins: Behind the Student Anxiety’; comment in The Daily Telegraph (April 1967) 1968 ‘Revolution, Tradition and Political Continuity’ in Politics and Experience: Essays Presented to Professor Michael Oakeshott on the Occasion of His Retirement (CUP, 1968). Review of F.S McNeilly’s ‘The anatomy of Leviathan’ (Macmillan 1968). ‘How Strong a Force?’. Insight No. 3 University of Sussex (Autumn, 1968) 1969 ‘Fantasy World of Student Militants’; comment in The Daily Telegraph (February, 1969) KM at the Select Comittee on Education and Science (Sub- Committee A), on ‘Student Militancy at the London School of Economics’ (May, 1969). Review of ‘The Idea of Progress’ by Sidney Pollard, History Vol. 54. No. 182 (October 1969) 1970 ‘Che Guevara’ in The New Left: Six Critical Essays Maurice Cranston ed. (Bodley Head: 1970). ‘The collection cult’; review of Dorothy Emmet and Alasdair MacIntyre;s Sociological Theory and Philosophical Analysis in Spectator (October, 1970). ‘On the Fashionable Idea of National Guilt’ in The American Scholar (Autumn, 1970) 1971 ‘KM on modern ideology’; in The Spectator Review of Books (June, 1971) ‘Guide to Galbraith’; review of Kenneth Galbraith’s A Contemporary Guide to Economics, Peace and Laughter in Spectator (November, 1971) 1972 ‘Less Darkness at Noon’; review of Leonard Schapiro’s Key Concepts in Political Science: Totalitarianism (1972) ‘Theatricality and Politics: Machiavelli’s concept of Fantasia’ in The Morality of Politics by Bhikhu Parekh (1972) ‘Hobbes and the Just Man’ in Hobbes-Forschungen (Berlin: Duncker and Humblot). [published by Koselleck, 1972) ‘ ‘Grasping Nettles’: review of T.J Nossiter, A.H Hanson, Stein Rokkan’s (eds) Imagination and Precision in the Social Science in Spectator (July, 1972) ‘Erotics in Wonderland’; review of Richard King’s The Party of Eros in Spectator (October, 1972) Encyclopaedia Americana, vol 17, pp. 294-297, Entry on ‘The Liberal Party’ (1972) ‘Politics without pain’; review of Bernard Crick’s Political Theory and Practice in Spectator (December, 1972) ‘Epiphenomenalism in Politics: The Quest for Political Reality’ in Political Studies (December 1972). 1973 An Introduction’ to Leviathan, Thomas Hobbes. (JM Dent, 1973) ‘Hard shell and soft head’; review of Barrington Moore’s Reflections in the Causes of Human Misery in Spectator (March 1973) ‘Bags of tricks’; review of F. H Hinsley’s Nationalism and the International System in Spectator (April 1973). ‘Philosophy and fashion’; review of Ivan Illich’s Tools for Conviviality in Spectator (October, 1973). ‘Political Science’; review of Jonathan Benthall’s The Limits of Human Nature in Spectator (December, 1973) ‘Two Hisses for Democracy: Politics and Theory’ in Encounter (December, 1973). 1974 THE CONCEPT OF A UNIVERSITY Review: The Aryan Myth: A History of Racist and Nationalist Ideas in Europe by Leon Poliakov 1974 Review of: Thomas Hobbes in his time ed. R.Ross, H.W. Schneider and T. Waldman and Hobbes on Civil Association by Michael Oakeshott ‘Parts and wholes: Twentieth century interpretation of Thomas Hobbes’, in Anales de la Catedra Francisco Suarez’ (1974). ‘Universities: What they are and the many ways they are currently misunderstood’ in Purposes in Education (Institute for Cultural Research, 1974), 14-29. ‘Who are the masters now?’ in Spectator (February 1974) The notion of ‘higherness’; review of R.E Bell and A.J. Youngson’s Present and Future in Higher Education in THES (March, 1974). ‘The knobbly sensibility of the modern socialist’; review of Ralph Miliband and John Saville’s The Socialist Register in THES (March, 1974). ‘Ideas, on the Stage and Off: From Rousseau to Marx’, a review of Economic Materialism and Social Moralism by Shirley M Gruner Encounter (April, 1974). ‘Doctor Fromm’s Attempt at a Cure’ Encounter (July 1974) ‘Working on the Pleasure Principle’: review of Alisdair Clare’s ‘Work and Play’ August 30th 1974 ‘Defending the Single Realm: On Ernest Gellner’ a review of Ernest Gellner’s Cause and Meaning in the Social Sciences: Contemporary Thought and Politics, the Devil in Modern Philosophy in Encounter (October 1974). ‘National Interests’; review of Andrew Gamble’s The Conservative Nation in THES (November, 1974) 1975 Column in The Times Higher Education Supplement (1975-76) - ‘Politicians need a language of their own’ - ‘The survival of English is at stake’ - ‘Chieftain of the learned clan’ - ‘Is LSE Light Horse enough of a Defense?’ - ‘Crowther-Hunt and the future confidence’ - ‘Depth rather than breath’ - ‘Never send to know for whom the bell tolls’ - ‘Free speech for closed minds’ - ‘The price to pay for having ideas’ - ‘This passion for polishing our images’ (December ‘75) - ‘A culture to match one’s geography’ (April ‘76) - ‘Do Universities ruin good conversation’ (June ‘76) ‘Recent Discussions from Machiavelli to Althusser’ in Political Studies (March, 1975). Remarks on the Relations between Social Contracts and Reason of State in Machiavelli and Hobbes in Roman Schnur (Ed.) Staatsrason, (Berlin: Dunker Ampersand Humblot) 1975 ‘The uncertainties of socialism’; a review of Leszek Kolakowski and Stuart Hampshire’s (eds.) The Socialist Idea in the TLS (March 1975). ‘The Modern State’; a review if J H Shennan’s The Origins of the Modern European State in European Studies Review 5:2 (April, 1975). ‘The academic arbitrator’; review of Alain Montefiore’s (ed) Neutrality and Impartiality: the university of political commitment. (May, 1975). ‘Sober thoughts on University Government’, Minerva Vol. XIII, No. 2 (Summer, 1975) ‘The Department of Government’ in LSE: The Magazine of the London School of Economics and Political Science vol 49 (June 1975), 1-2 ‘Dr Spock Thinks Again’ in Encounter (July, 1975). ‘Oakeshott and the Idea of Freedom’ [an essay on OHC and its relation to Hobbes and Hegel] in Quadrant (October 1975). ‘The doctrine of violence’; review of many books by Raymond Aron. David Boulton, Gordon Carr, Angela Davis, and Richard Clutterbuck (November, 1975). ‘Wrong terms’; review of John Plamenatz’s Karl Marx’s Philosophy of Man in Spectator (December, 1975), 1976 CONTEMPORARY POLITICAL PHILOSOPHERS ‘Michael Oakeshott: The Boundless Ocean of Politics’ in Contemporary Political Philosophers Antony De Crespigny ed. (Methuen, 1976). ‘Nationalism and the Patriotism of City States’ in National Movements Anthony Smith ed. (Macmillan: 1976). ‘The material benefits’; comment in TLS (April 1976) ‘A tragic pragmatism’ a review of Pragmatism and the Tragic Sense of Life by Sidney Hook in Quadrant (May 1976). ‘The Guru: Carlos Castaneda’ in Encounter (August 1976). ‘Humanist Democracy: the political thought of C.B Macpherson’, in The Canadian Journal of Political Science (Sept. 1976) (A revised paper from 1975 conference in Edmonton Alberta ) ‘The Origins Of History’; comment in Quadrant (wrongly dated) ‘Nazi Rituals’ review of The Nationalization of the masses by George Mosse (Quadrant, September 1976) ‘Rules which make civilization possible’; review of F.A Hayek’s Law, Legislation and Liberty: The Mirage of Social Justice in THES (December, 1976). 1977 ‘A theory of theories’; review of Gouldner’s The Dialectic of Ideology and Technology in TES (Jan., 1977). ‘As the politics of love breed hatred’; comment in The Daily Telegraph (February. 1977) Review of Ted Honderich’s Social Ends and Political Means in Philosophy (April, 1977) ‘If the Law should fall’; review of Ronald Dworkin’s
Recommended publications
  • The Method of Antinomies: Oakeshott and Others Others and Oakeshott Antinomies: of Method the VOLUME 6 | ISSUE 1 + 2 2018 6 | ISSUE VOLUME
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Philosophy Faculty Publications Philosophy 2018 The ethoM d of Antinomies: Oakeshott nda Others Stephen Turner University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/phi_facpub Scholar Commons Citation Turner, Stephen, "The eM thod of Antinomies: Oakeshott nda Others" (2018). Philosophy Faculty Publications. 309. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/phi_facpub/309 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Philosophy at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Method of Antinomies: Oakeshott and Others STEPHEN TURNER Email: [email protected] Web: http://philosophy.usf.edu/faculty/sturner/ Abstract: Michael Oakeshott employed a device of argument and analysis that appears in a number of other thinkers, where it is given the name “antinomies.” These differ from binary oppositions or contradictories in that the two poles are bound to- gether. In this discussion, the nature of this binding is explored in detail, in large part in relation to Oakeshott’s own usages, such as his discussion of the relation of faith and skepticism, between collective goal-oriented associations and those based on contract, and between a legal regime based on neutral rules and one oriented to policy goals . Other examples might include Weber’s distinction between the politics of intention and the politics of responsibility. Moreover, such ambiguous concepts as “rights,” have antinomic interpretations. In each of these cases, the full realization of one ideal led, in practice, to consequenc- es associated with the other: in political practice, neither polar ideal was realizable without concessions to the other.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of the New Right on the Reagan Administration
    LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS UNIVERSITY OF LONDON THE IMPACT OF THE NEW RIGHT ON THE REAGAN ADMINISTRATION: KIRKPATRICK & UNESCO AS. A TEST CASE BY Isaac Izy Kfir LONDON 1998 UMI Number: U148638 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U148638 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 2 ABSTRACT The aim of this research is to investigate whether the Reagan administration was influenced by ‘New Right’ ideas. Foreign policy issues were chosen as test cases because the presidency has more power in this area which is why it could promote an aggressive stance toward the United Nations and encourage withdrawal from UNESCO with little impunity. Chapter 1 deals with American society after 1945. It shows how the ground was set for the rise of Reagan and the New Right as America moved from a strong affinity with New Deal liberalism to a new form of conservatism, which the New Right and Reagan epitomised. Chapter 2 analyses the New Right as a coalition of three distinctive groups: anti-liberals, New Christian Right, and neoconservatives.
    [Show full text]
  • George W. Bush: a Neo-Conservative? Written by Mike Spaan
    George W. Bush: A Neo-Conservative? Written by Mike Spaan This PDF is auto-generated for reference only. As such, it may contain some conversion errors and/or missing information. For all formal use please refer to the official version on the website, as linked below. George W. Bush: A Neo-Conservative? https://www.e-ir.info/2015/05/25/george-w-bush-a-neo-conservative/ MIKE SPAAN, MAY 25 2015 What is Neo-Conservatism and how did this Influence American Foreign Policy during the Presidency of George W. Bush? The neo-conservative movement has been one of the most controversial in the modern post-Cold War era of International Relations (Leffler 2005 395; Williams 2005: 307). Its adherents are principally American intellectuals, writers and public servants. Despite this, much confusion still exists as to the nature of the movement and its ideas. The movement came about in the latter part of the 1960s, and garnered considerable influence since that time (Boot 2004: 21; Williams 2005: 309; Singh 2009: 34). This influence, however, remained on the fringes of policy-making until the administration of George W. Bush adopted some policies and strategies that could loosely be described as neo-conservative tenets. This paper has two distinct aims. First, to explore what neo-conservatism entails in the modern post-Cold War era and, secondly, to explore the degree to which neo-conservatives were able to influence the Bush administration. In doing so, this paper hopes to refute commonly held misconceptions about the movement and more importantly, the degree to which it was able to influence, or as some would assert, ‘hijack’ United States (US) foreign policy under President Bush (Austin 2005: 53).
    [Show full text]
  • Portugal, Slovakia, and the Political Counter- Reformation of the Twentieth Century (1910- 1939)
    23 ZuZana Poláčková – Pieter C. van Duin Portugal, Slovakia, and the political Counter- reformation of the twentieth century (1910- 1939) This essay tries to make a comparative analysis of the political dynamics of Portugal and Slovakia in the first half of the twentieth century (1910-1939) in terms of the significance of conservative political Catholicism. The two countries belonged to a group of nations in Europe in which there was a strong reaction to political liberalism, progressive republicanism, cultural secularism, and socialism. This an- tagonism can arguably be seen as a modern continuation of the historic conflict between the Protestant and humanist Reformation and the Catholic Counter-Reformation. Its twentieth-century manifestation was of course somewhat different from the original sixteenth- and seventeenth-century conflict. After the eighteenth century the historic force of anti-Catholic Reformation was mainly expressed in the form of intellectual Enlightenment, anti-clericalism, and social and cultural progressivism. But it would seem that in many ways the dynamics and aggressive energy of this great cultural confrontation was continued during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, although in a modified ideological and political shape. The years between 1910 and 1940 were the period when the conflict between political progressivism and Catholic conservatism reached its culmination. In Portugal the forces of cultural secularism and liberal republicanism were defeated by the new authoritarian regime led by Salazar. In Slovakia the foundation and then the end of the First Czechoslovak Republic brought the rise and then the victory of the Catho- lic opposition movement, the Slovak People’s Party of Andrej Hlinka and Jozef Tiso.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Revolutionary Intellectuals in the Weimar Republic and National Socialist Germany: Carl Schmitt, Martin Heidegger, and Ernst Jϋnger Vincent S
    State University of New York College at Buffalo - Buffalo State College Digital Commons at Buffalo State History Theses History and Social Studies Education 5-2013 Conservative Revolutionary Intellectuals in the Weimar Republic and National Socialist Germany: Carl Schmitt, Martin Heidegger, and Ernst Jϋnger Vincent S. Betts [email protected] Advisor John D. Abromeit, Ph.D., Assistant Professor of History First Reader Georg G. Iggers, Ph.D., Distinguished Professor Emeritus, University at Buffalo Department Chair Andrew D. Nicholls, Ph.D., Chair and Professor of History To learn more about the History and Social Studies Education Department and its educational programs, research, and resources, go to http://history.buffalostate.edu/. Recommended Citation Betts, incV ent S., "Conservative Revolutionary Intellectuals in the Weimar Republic and National Socialist Germany: Carl Schmitt, Martin Heidegger, and Ernst Jϋnger" (2013). History Theses. Paper 19. Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.buffalostate.edu/history_theses Part of the European History Commons, and the Intellectual History Commons i ABSTRACT OF THESIS Conservative Revolutionary Intellectuals in the Weimar Republic and National Socialist Germany: Carl Schmitt, Martin Heidegger, and Ernst J ϋnger This thesis will examine the writings and career/life paths of three conservative revolutionary intellectuals during the Weimar Republic and National Socialist Germany. The purpose of this examination is not only to provide an overview of the development of conservative revolutionary thought in Germany after World War I, but also to investigate the influence these intellectuals had on the National Socialists’ seizure and consolidation of power. The works and lives of three important intellectuals will be examined: Carl Schmitt, Martin Heidegger, and Ernst Jϋnger.
    [Show full text]
  • Ordinary People Theodore Dalrymple Worse Than Rupert Myles Harris Horror in the Fjords Paul Gottfried Poland's Road to Brussel
    The The quarterly magazine of conservative thought Ordinary People Horror in the Fjords Arab Winter Theodore Dalrymple Paul Gottfried Pavel Stroilov Worse than Poland’s Road to Why Single Rupert Brussels Currencies Fail Myles Harris Jane Kelly Christie Davies Autumn 2011 Vol 30 No 1 £4.99 Contents 3 Editorial Articles 4 The Rape of Justice 17 God’s Atoms Stephen Baskerville Brian Ridley 6 Poland’s Road to Brussels 19 ‘Don’t Worry?’ Jane Kelly Frances Hallinan 8 Worse Than Rupert 20 The Climate of Treason Myles Harris James Bryson 9 Arab Winter 21 Horror in the Fjords Pavel Stroilov Paul Gottfried 11 How Single Currencies Fail 23 Abolish Disney Degrees Christie Davies Vernon Rogers 13 Ordinary People 26 Growing Old Disgracefully Theodore Dalrymple Henry Oliver 14 Nothing to Hide, Nothing to Fear? 27 The Lawyers’ Trough Mark Griffith Richard Packer 16 Machiavelli’s Influence on British Philosophy 29 No Joking at the BBC Edmund O’Toole Marc Blake Columns Arts & Books 37 John Jolliffe 31 Conservative Classic — 44 on Italy Frederick Rolfe: Hadrian the Seventh 38 Nicolai Tolstoy 33 Reputations — 33 on Lawrence of Arabia Robertson Davies 39 William Charlton 35 Roy Kerridge on Alistair McIntyre 36 Eternal Life 41 M R D Foot Peter Mullen on Italian Resistance 42 Martin Dewhirst on Borderlands 43 Nigel Jones on the Cavaliers 45 Celia Haddon on the Fur Trade 46 Anthony Hallgarten on Spin Bowlers 47 Robert Crowcroft on the Coalition 49 Penelope Tremayne on an Unknown War 50 Frank Ellis on Afghanistan 52 Will Robinson on Murder 53 M R D Foot on a Call to Arms 54 Theatre: Richard Foulkes on Tom Stoppard 56 Music: R J Stove on Widor 58 In Short Managing Editor: Merrie Cave Consulting Editors: Roger Scruton Lord Charles Cecil, Myles Harris, Mark Baillie, Christie Davies, Literary Editor: Ian Crowther 33 Canonbury Park South, London N1 2JW Tel: 020 7226 7791 Fax: 020 7354 0383 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: http://www.salisburyreview.co.uk ritain is, as usual, being undermined from itself a lie.
    [Show full text]
  • English Conservatism and the Aesthetics of Architecture
    English Conservatism and the Aesthetics of Architecture Michael Rustin Prologue many weeks of the year. If one wants to ~ake an argument Architecture seems a 'natural' subject for conservatives, for the importance of tradition in social life, architecture and it is therefore fitting that it has become one of the seems to be the prototypical place to do so. maill t·:!rrains for the advocacy of the intellectual perspect­ Yet the ideological need for this arises paradoxically ives of the New Right. Particularly, that is, of the New because the intellectual field of architecture has been Right in England, where organic and traditionalist ideas dominated until recently in England by the protagonists of have remained more influential than in the more individual­ the Modern. A generation of architectural writers and hist­ ist stream of neo-conservative thought in the United orians, which included Nicholas Pevsner, James Richards, States. The critique of 'modernism' has been a major theme Herbert Read and even John Summerson, argued for the of t l1e architectural journals in England for several years. proper linkage of a new architecture with a more demo­ Some months ago the Prince 'of Wales, probably by no cratic and egalitarian society. While the advocacy and means a 'new rightist' in general outlook, chose to launch practice of 'modernism' in England has taken the evolution­ an attack on the sins of modern architecture, and on the ary and mild form that one might expect from other as­ National Gallery Extension plans and the proposed Mies van pects of British social development, nevertheless it has der Rohe skyscraper in the City of London in particular.
    [Show full text]
  • Trans-Atlantic Elements in the Domestic Policy Attitudes of the British and American Conservative Movements, 1980-1990
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects Summer 2016 Trans-Atlantic Elements in the Domestic Policy Attitudes of the British and American Conservative Movements, 1980-1990. Samuel Inigo Packer College of William and Mary - Arts & Sciences, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Packer, Samuel Inigo, "Trans-Atlantic Elements in the Domestic Policy Attitudes of the British and American Conservative Movements, 1980-1990." (2016). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1499449838. http://doi.org/10.21220/S21H29 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Trans-Atlantic elements in the Domestic policy attitudes of the British and American Conservative Movements,1980-1990. Samuel Inigo Packer Chilmark, Wiltshire, United Kingdom Bachelor of Arts, University of Oxford, 2015. A Thesis presented to the Graduate Faculty of the College of William and Mary in Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Arts. Lyon G. Tyler Department of History The College of William and Mary August, 2016 © Copyright by Samuel Inigo Packer 2016 ABSTRACT Trans-Atlantic elements in the Domestic policy attitudes of the British and American Conservative Movements,1980-1990. This paper explores the relationship between British and American Conservative activists during the 1980s when Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan dominated the politics of their respective countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    BIBLIOGRAPHY A. INTERVIEWS Jacob Rees-Mogg MP (London), 9th February 2016. Jesse Norman MP (London), 12th September 2016. Nicholas Winterton (Cheshire), 23rd September 2016. Ann Winterton (Cheshire), 23rd September 2016. Peter Hitchens (London), 11th October 2016. Anne Widdecombe (London), 11th October 2016. Lord Salisbury (London), 12th October 2016. Sir William Cash MP (London), 13th October 2016. Sir Edward Leigh MP (London), 17th January 2017. David Burrowes MP (London), 17th January 2017. Charles Moore (London), 17th January 2017. Philip Davies MP (London), 19th January 2017. Sir Gerald Howarth MP (London), 19th January 2017. Dr. Myles Harris (London), 27th January 2017. Lord Sudeley (London), 6th February 2017. Jonathan Aitken (London), 6th February 2017. David Nicholson (London), 13th February 2017. Gregory Lauder-Frost (telephone), 23rd February 2017. Richard Ritchie (London), 8th March 2017. Tim Janman (London), 27th March 2017. Lord Deben (London), 4th April 2017. Lord Griffths of Fforestfach (London), 6th April 2017. Lord Tebbit (London), 6th April 2017. Sir Adrian Fitzgerald (London), 10th April 2017. © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2020 191 K. Hickson, Britain’s Conservative Right since 1945, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27697-3 192 BIBLIOGRAPHY Edward Norman (telephone), 28th April 2017. Cedric Gunnery (London), 2nd May 2017. Paul Bristol (London), 3rd May 2017. Harvey Thomas (London), 3rd May 2017. Ian Crowther (telephone), 12th May 2017. Iain Duncan Smith MP (London), 4th July 2017. Angela Ellis-Jones (London), 4th July 2017. John Hayes MP (London), 4th July 2017. Dennis Walker (London), 24th July 2017. Lord Howard of Lympne (London), 12th September 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Roger Scruton
    ROGER SCRUTON Roger Vernon Scruton 27 February 1944 – 12 January 2020 elected Fellow of the British Academy 2008 by ANTHONY O’HEAR There can be little doubt that by the time of his death in 2020 Sir Roger Scruton had become one of the most important thinkers of his time, not just in Britain, but throughout the English-speaking world and in Europe, particularly in Central Europe. The term ‘thinker’ is used advisedly here. For while Scruton was primarily and pre- eminently a philosopher, indeed an academic philosopher, his range and influence extended into many fields, including religion, music, architecture, politics, the environ- ment, culture in a general sense, the writing of novels, the appreciation of wine, defences of hunting and traditional country life and the nature of animal rights. In addition to his writing, he composed music, including two operas, was a publisher and editor and advised governments. He was active politically in this country and played a significant role in dissident movements in the Eastern bloc before and after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the British Academy, XIX, 447–465 Posted 26 November 2020. © British Academy 2020. ROGER SCRUTON Academic career Roger Vernon Scruton was born in Lincolnshire in 1944, and educated at the Royal Grammar School in High Wycombe from 1954 to 1961. He then attended Jesus College, Cambridge, from 1962 to 1965 and again from 1967 to 1969. He took a Double First in Moral Sciences (Philosophy) in 1967, after which he spent a year as a lecteur in the University College of Pau.
    [Show full text]
  • The President's Conservatives: Richard Nixon and the American Conservative Movement
    ALL THE PRESIDENT'S CONSERVATIVES: RICHARD NIXON AND THE AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE MOVEMENT. David Sarias Rodriguez Department of History University of Sheffield Submitted for the degree of PhD October 2010 ABSTRACT This doctoral dissertation exammes the relationship between the American conservative movement and Richard Nixon between the late 1940s and the Watergate scandal, with a particular emphasis on the latter's presidency. It complements the sizeable bodies ofliterature about both Nixon himself and American conservatism, shedding new light on the former's role in the collapse of the post-1945 liberal consensus. This thesis emphasises the part played by Nixon in the slow march of American conservatism from the political margins in the immediate post-war years to the centre of national politics by the late 1960s. The American conservative movement is treated as a diverse epistemic community made up of six distinct sub-groupings - National Review conservatives, Southern conservatives, classical liberals, neoconservatives, American Enterprise Institute conservatives and the 'Young Turks' of the New Right - which, although philosophically and behaviourally autonomous, remained intimately associated under the overall leadership of the intellectuals who operated from the National Review. Although for nearly three decades Richard Nixon and American conservatives endured each other in a mutually frustrating and yet seemingly unbreakable relationship, Nixon never became a fully-fledged member of the movement. Yet, from the days of Alger Hiss to those of the' Silent Majority', he remained the political actor best able to articulate and manipulate the conservative canon into a populist, electorally successful message. During his presidency, the administration's behaviour played a crucial role - even if not always deliberately - in the momentous transformation of the conservative movement into a more diverse, better-organised, modernised and more efficient political force.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Revolution”
    Introduction Countercultures Ideologies and Practices Alternative Visions BEYOND HISTORICISM: UTOPIAN THOUGHT IN THE “CONSERVATIVE REVOLUTION” Robbert-Jan Adriaansen The “Conservative Revolution” presents a paradox to contemporary scholars, as the idea of a revolution seems to challenge the very foundations of conservatism. “Conservative Revolution” is a col- ligatory concept; it does not refer to any particular historical event but to a current in intellectual thought that gained prominence in the German Weimar Republic.1 Comprising a broad array of right- wing authors, thinkers, and movements, the concept of “Conserva- tive Revolution” was introduced as an analytical category by Armin Mohler in his dissertation Die Konservative Revolution in Deutschland (1949).He defi ned it as “that spiritual movement of regeneration that tried to clear away the ruins of the nineteenth century and tried to 1 Colligatory concepts are create a new order of life.”2 Covering vö lkisch authors, Young Con- concepts used by histori- ans to create unity in the servatives such as Oswald Spengler and Arthur Moeller van den morass of past ideas and Bruck, National Revolutionaries — like brothers Ernst and Friedrich events; they bring them together under a general Georg Jü nger — and also two more organized movements, the metaphor such as Landvolkbewegung and the Bü ndische Jugend, Mohler presented a “Renaissance,” “Industrial Revolution,” or, indeed, taxonomy of a heterogeneous array of thinkers and organizations that “Conservative Revolution.” did not regard itself as a unifi ed movement but shared a common See William H. Walsh, “Colligatory Concepts in attitude to life, society, and politics. History,” in The Philosophy of History, ed.
    [Show full text]