DOCSLIB.ORG

Russian Pair Steppes Out

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Russian Pair Steppes Out DAILY BULLETIN PDF version, courtesy of EBL Bulletin 2 Sunday, 17 March 2002 Editor: Jean-Paul Meyer – Co-editors: Mark Horton, Jos Jacobs, Franco Broccoli – Layout Editor: Stelios Hatzidakis Russian Pair Steppes Out PLAYING SCHEDULE Today, Sunday, March 17 10.30 3rd Qualification Session 16.30 Final & Consolation 1st Session Contents First Blood .............................................................................. 2 Coffee with a Lavazza Smile Where Do They Come From? .......................................... 3 Striptease ................................................................................ 3 At the end of the first day's play the leading pairs Bidding Challenge .................................................................. 3 come from a broad spectrum of the competing coun- Adventures in Play ................................................................ 4 tries.Top of the table are Russia's Marina Kalina and That’s Really Unusual ............................................................ 6 Arseni Shur. They are followed by two French pairs, 2002 European Women’s Bridge Festival ........................ 7 Daniele Avon and Jean-Louis Stoppa, second and Results after 2 sessions ........................................................ 9 Sabine Tisserand and Jacques Frances, third. With only this morning's session left to determine the qualifiers several of the favourites are in danger of miss- ing the cut, notably Portugal's Maria Joao Lara and Manuel Capucho, the Franglais pairing of Benedicte Cronier and Paul Hackett, the Austro/Polish alliance of Maria Erhart and Krzysztof Lasocki, the pride of France, Catherine D'Ovidio and Paul Chemla and Italy's Enza Rossano and Antonio Vivaldi. Performance of the day belonged to Bulgaria's Dessy Popova and Rosen Gunev, who won the second ses- sion with 68.5% to rise from 278th to fourteenth. 7th EUROPEAN BRIDGE MIXED CHAMPIONSHIPS Ostend, Belgium FIRST BLOOD Véronique and Michel Bessis have already stepped onto the Spades,A Girl's Best Friend? highest tier of the podium twice in the past in the team event, and this year they are also trying for honours in the pairs com- On board 2 the bidding was very short. South opened One petition of the European Bridge Mixed Championship. Diamond, West, Jean Guillon of France overcalled with One Heart and that ended the bidding. Board 2. Dealer East. N/S Vul. [ J 8 3 ]9 8 { 10 5 } K J 10 7 5 4 [ A K 10 6N [ 7 5 2 ] J 6 4 3 2 ] Q 10 W E { A Q J { K 9 8 4 } 8S } Q 6 3 2 [ Q 9 4 ] A K 7 5 { 7 6 3 2 }A 9 The lead was the ten of diamonds taken by declarer.When Michel Bessis, France South came in with the king of hearts she played back a diamond and later two rounds of clubs after winning the ace of trumps. Good Technique Gives No Bonus Now West could take nine tricks for 140, engineering a coup en Mrs Baldursdottir,from Iceland was the first declarer of the day: passant.A spade shift after the first heart, difficult to find, would have held West to 8 tricks. Board 1. Dealer North. None Vul. [ 10 4 2 What Would You Lead? ]J 8 Board 4, West opens One Diamond, rebids 2NT over his partner's Two Clubs and plays in 3NT. { J 9 7 6 5 What do you lead from: } J 5 2 [ Q J 5 [ Q 3N [ A K 8 6 5 ] K Q 7 5 2 ] A 4 ] 8 5 4 2 W E { A Q 4 3 { K 10 { K 10 } A 3S } 9 8 6 4 } 8 4 3 2 [ J 9 7 Michel Bessis chose a low heart and that was the correct way ] 10 9 6 3 to hold the declarer to 9 tricks.The full hand: {8 2 Board 4. Dealer West.All Vul. } K Q 10 7 [ Q J 5 The bidding was short: One Spade, Two Hearts, Two No ] 8 5 4 2 trumps,Three No trumps. By the way how much would you like to be in a no trump {K 10 slam? Assuming you get a club lead it nothing less than a little } 8 4 3 2 under 60% proposition - as a 3-3 break in either major suit is [ K 8 4 3N [ A 6 2 enough. ] Q 9 3 ] K J Declarer took the queen of clubs lead and went for spades. W E When she discovered the happy break, discarding a club from { A Q 9 4 { J 6 5 3 dummy, she should stop and draw 3 rounds of hearts to estab- } K 6S } A J 10 7 lish eventually a squeeze in the red suits against North. In fact, [ 10 9 7 she continued with two more rounds of spades, North discard- ] A 10 7 6 ing 2 diamonds.After a long huddle,West decided to discard a di- amond and a heart but as you can see there was no way to take { 8 7 2 more than 12 tricks. } Q 9 5 2 16 - 22 March 2002 7th EUROPEAN BRIDGE MIXED CHAMPIONSHIPS Do you know Tartan ? WHERE DO THEY Board 8. Dealer West. None Vul. COME FROM ? [ A 10 9 6 3 ] A 9 8 From 29 countries… {9 Austria 5 Greece 1 Poland 22 } K Q J 2 Belgium 34 Hungary 1 Portugal 3 [ Q 7 [ K 8 5 4 2 Bulgaria 4 Iceland 13 Russia 7 N Croatia 6 Ireland 8 Scotland 3 ] K 7 6 5 3 ] Q W E Czech Rep. 5 Israel 10 Spain 3 { K Q J 4 3 { A 10 8 6 5 Denmark 10 Italy 68 Sweden 5 }6S }8 7 England 27 Lithuania 1 Switzerland 4 Finland 4 Malte 1 Turkey 6 [J France 94 Netherlands 20 Wales 2 ] J 10 4 2 Germany 26 Norway 8 Yugoslavia 2 {7 2 } A 10 9 5 4 3 Mrs Pippet and Mr O'Lubaigh from Ireland opened the West Bidding Challenge hand Two Hearts, alerted as Tartan. The French pair seemed to This was yesterday's bidding challenge: Did any of you have never heard of this convention, the explanation was that it reach the top spot? showed 5 hearts and 4+ of an unknown minor. North overcalled with Two Spades and that finished the bidding. Declarer was clever enough to escape for one down, not such a good result [ A K Q J when at other table East/West were happy to sacrifice in Five Di- ] K Q 5 3 amonds for 300 against a cold Five Clubs. { A 7 5 2 Will you adopt Tartan for the next championship? }K Striptease N Did you get the chance to show off on this deal from the W E first session? S Board 20. Dealer West.All Vul. [ 10 9 5 2 [Q 6 ]– ]K 8 {J { 10 9 8 4 } A Q 9 8 7 6 4 3 } K 10 9 7 3 Our suggested scoring: [ 4 2N [ J 10 9 8 7 3 ] Q J 10 6 4 3 2 ] 7 Pairs: 7} 10; 7[ 6; 6[ 5; 6} 4; others 0. W E Teams: 7} 10; 6[/6} 5; 7[ 3. { Q { A 7 6 5 } Q J 6S } 5 2 If you are looking for a possible route why not this: [ A K 5 North South ] A 9 5 1{ 2} { K J 3 2 2NT 5} } A 8 4 6} 7} Assuming West started with Three Hearts, South's 3NT will have concluded the auction. West leads the queen of or for the scientists hearts and declarer wins in dummy.We are sure many play- North South ers will have run a diamond to West's queen at trick two. (1) Back comes a heart and declarer wins and knocks out the 2NT 3[ ace of diamonds. Say East exits with a spade. Declarer wins 3NT 4} in dummy, comes to hand with a diamond and plays a low 4{ 4] club, intending to duck the trick to East.When West puts in 4[ 6} an honour, declarer cashes the remaining winners in the 7} pointed suits to forcr West down to }Q6 and the ]J. Now declarer, who has a complete count, can exit with a heart to (1) Transfer to Clubs force West to lead into the split club tenace. 3 7th EUROPEAN BRIDGE MIXED CHAMPIONSHIPS Ostend, Belgium Adventures In Play Isn't this the main ingredient of any pairs tournament? Why it on the club ruff. An initial club lead would even put it down bother about who did what when over 400 pairs are competing? two.This would still be a good save against the vulnerable game One can be pretty sure that most of the beautiful plays found at in the cards here for N/S.The only thing needed is to guess to one specific table will have been duplicated somewhere else.And play the [K on the first round of the suit.The opposite results, if not, just simply read on about the missed chances. 4] making and 4[ down two are much more likely to occur, Take for example the board below. however… Board 9. Dealer North. E/W Vul. Board 12. Dealer West. N/S Vul. [ A Q 7 6 4 3 [ J 8 6 3 ]Q 8 ] 7 4 2 {A { A 10 8 } Q 10 9 3 } A 9 2 [ 5N [ J 10 9 8 2 [ 10 5 4N [ 9 7 2 ] A K 5 4 3 ] 7 2 ] Q 6 5 ] K J 9 3 W E W E { J 10 5 4 3 2 { K 7 { J 5 { K 6 3 2 } 7S } K J 6 4 } Q 8 6 4 3S } J 10 [K [ A K Q ] J 10 9 6 ] A 10 8 { Q 9 8 6 { Q 9 7 4 } A 8 5 2 } K 7 5 If North opens 1[ and South responds with a forcing (or One might expect the auction to be 1{-1[; 2NT-3NT at even non-forcing) notrump, you need a gadget to show your nearly all tables.West hits the jackpot with a heart lead, but on mediocre two suiter, if you want to show it at all.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introducion to Duplicate
    INTRODUCTION to DUPLICATE INTRODUCTION TO DUPLICATE BRIDGE This book is not about how to bid, declare or defend a hand of bridge. It assumes you know how to do that or are learning how to do those things elsewhere. It is your guide to playing Duplicate Bridge, which is how organized, competitive bridge is played all over the World. It explains all the Laws of Duplicate and the process of entering into Club games or Tournaments, the Convention Card, the protocols and rules of player conduct; the paraphernalia and terminology of duplicate. In short, it’s about the context in which duplicate bridge is played. To become an accomplished duplicate player, you will need to know everything in this book. But you can start playing duplicate immediately after you read Chapter I and skim through the other Chapters. © ACBL Unit 533, Palm Springs, Ca © ACBL Unit 533, 2018 Pg 1 INTRODUCTION to DUPLICATE This book belongs to Phone Email I joined the ACBL on ____/____ /____ by going to www.ACBL.com and signing up. My ACBL number is __________________ © ACBL Unit 533, 2018 Pg 2 INTRODUCTION to DUPLICATE Not a word of this book is about how to bid, play or defend a bridge hand. It assumes you have some bridge skills and an interest in enlarging your bridge experience by joining the world of organized bridge competition. It’s called Duplicate Bridge. It’s the difference between a casual Saturday morning round of golf or set of tennis and playing in your Club or State championships. As in golf or tennis, your skills will be tested in competition with others more or less skilled than you; this book is about the settings in which duplicate happens.
    [Show full text]
  • Things You Might Like to Know About Duplicate Bridge
    ♠♥♦♣ THINGS YOU MIGHT LIKE TO KNOW ABOUT DUPLICATE BRIDGE Prepared by MayHem Published by the UNIT 241 Board of Directors ♠♥♦♣ Welcome to Duplicate Bridge and the ACBL This booklet has been designed to serve as a reference tool for miscellaneous information about duplicate bridge and its governing organization, the ACBL. It is intended for the newer or less than seasoned duplicate bridge players. Most of these things that follow, while not perfectly obvious to new players, are old hat to experienced tournaments players. Table of Contents Part 1. Expected In-behavior (or things you need to know).........................3 Part 2. Alerts and Announcements (learn to live with them....we have!)................................................4 Part 3. Types of Regular Events a. Stratified Games (Pairs and Teams)..............................................12 b. IMP Pairs (Pairs)...........................................................................13 c. Bracketed KO’s (Teams)...............................................................15 d. Swiss Teams and BAM Teams (Teams).......................................16 e. Continuous Pairs (Side Games)......................................................17 f. Strategy: IMPs vs Matchpoints......................................................18 Part 4. Special ACBL-Wide Events (they cost more!)................................20 Part 5. Glossary of Terms (from the ACBL website)..................................25 Part 6. FAQ (with answers hopefully).........................................................40 Copyright © 2004 MayHem 2 Part 1. Expected In-Behavior Just as all kinds of competitive-type endeavors have their expected in- behavior, so does duplicate bridge. One important thing to keep in mind is that this is a competitive adventure.....as opposed to the social outing that you may be used to at your rubber bridge games. Now that is not to say that you can=t be sociable at the duplicate table. Of course you can.....and should.....just don=t carry it to extreme by talking during the auction or play.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 7: Bridgehands Newsletter the Street Smart Bridge Player August-September 2006
    Issue 7: BridgeHands Newsletter The Street Smart Bridge Player August-September 2006 Dear Bridge Friends, How aware are you of what’s really going on at the Bridge table? Do you consider yourself “street smart?” There is a saying that goes, “There are three types of people – those that are the movers and shakers that make things happen, those that are close to the action that help things happen and learn as they go, and finally those that are entirely clueless about what happened at all !” How about you? Hopefully history teaches us lessons at the table and in life. This issue will begin exploring the attributes of the street smart Bridge player. The results from the Chicago Summer 2006 NABC tourney are in, and BridgeHands has posted the tourney results, bulletins, and appeals. As always, most of the appeals deal with hesitations, changes in tempo, and unauthorized information. The remaining Laws rulings often provide interesting insights into the minds of the director and the appeals committee. How close is close when it comes to a played card from declarer’s hand? How about when it’s a change of call in the dummy from “ruff” to “overruff?” And what about when a Grand Life Master faces her 6 remaining cards, begins to describe the claim, retracts the faced cards and wants to continue play? Sometimes the interpretation of the Laws can work in strange and wondrous ways! BridgeHandshas joined the “Web 2.0” crowd, adding multimedia audio and an interactive blog (that’s short for a weblog) to our site.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\My Documents\Adobe
    American Contract Bridge League Presents Beached in Long Beach Appeals at the 2003 Summer NABC Plus cases from the 2003 Open and Women’s USBC Edited by Rich Colker ACBL Appeals Administrator Assistant Editor Linda Trent ACBL Appeals Manager CONTENTS Foreword ..................................................... iii The Expert Panel ................................................ v Cases from Long Beach Tempo (Cases 1-11) .......................................... 1 Unauthorized Information (Cases 12-20) ......................... 38 Misinformation (Cases 19-31).................................. 60 Other (Cases 32-37) ........................................ 107 Cases from U.S. Open and Women’s Bridge Championships (Cases 38-40) . 122 Closing Remarks From the Expert Panelists ......................... 138 Closing Remarks From the Editor ................................. 141 Advice for Advancing Players.................................... 143 NABC Appeals Committee ...................................... 144 Abbreviations used in this casebook: AI Authorized Information AWMW Appeal Without Merit Warning BIT Break in Tempo CoC Conditions of Contest CC Convention Card LA Logical Alternative MP Masterpoints MI Misinformation PP Procedural Penalty UI Unauthorized Information i ii FOREWORD We continue our presentation of appeals from NABC tournaments. As always our goal is to inform, provide constructive criticism and stimulate change (that is hopefully for the better) in a way that is instructive and entertaining. At NABCs, appeals from non-NABC+
    [Show full text]
  • Friendly Bridge Book, January 2020 Edition
    Beginning Bridge Lessons By Ed Kinlaw and Linda MacCleave Richmond Bridge Association Richmond, Virginia Copyright © 2003 First printing September 2003 Revised second printing February 2004 Revised third printing May 2004 Revised fourth printing September 2004 Revised fifth printing February 2005 Revised sixth printing September 2005 Revised seventh printing February 2006 Revised eighth printing August 2006 Revised ninth printing March 2007 Tenth printing September 2007 Revised eleventh printing January 2008 Revised twelfth printing August 2008 Revised thirteenth printing February 2009 Fourteenth printing July 2009 Revised fifteenth printing February 2010 Sixteenth printing August 2010 Revised seventeenth printing January 2011 Revised eighteenth printing August 2011 Revised nineteenth printing March 2012 Revised twentieth printing April 2012 Twenty-first printing August 2012 Revised Twenty-fifth printing January 2014 Revised 26th printing August 2014 Revised 27th printing February 2015 28th printing August 2015 29th printing February 2016 30th printing July 2016 31st printing January 2017 32nd printing September 2017 33rd printing February 2018 34th printing August 2018 35th printing February 2019 36th printing August 2019 37th revised printing February 2020 2 Table of Contents Lesson 1: Mechanics of a Hand in Duplicate Bridge 5 Lesson 2: How to Open and How to Respond to One-level Suit 12 Lesson 3: Rebids by Opening Bidder and Responder 17 Lesson 4: Overcalls 24 Lesson 5: Takeout Doubles 27 Lesson 6: Responding to No-Trump Opening—Stayman
    [Show full text]
  • Israelis Threaten Liv^S of 450 Arabs
    Average Daily Net Press Run The Weather For The Week Ended Cloudy, cool, periods of rain September 12,-1970 likely through Tuesday. Low to­ night In 50s. Wednesday cloudy, milder, ' continuing chance of 15,792 showers. Manchester— -A City of Village Charm VGL. L X X X IX , NO. 293 (TWENTY PAGES—TWO SECTIONS) MANCHESTER, CONN., MONpAY, SEPTEMBER i4, 1970 (Clasoifled Advertlsiiig on Page 17) PRICE TEN CENTS Communists Four Towri^ Israelis Threaten F o r c e Back End Strikes Cambodians At Schools Liv^s of 450 Arabs By JOHN T. WHEELER By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Associated Press.Writer Schools opened this morning By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS rlllas convicted by Israeli courts The guerrilla leadership re- PHNOM PENH (AP) — Ene- in three tbwns that were strlke- and to confiscate their property, vised Its figure today on the my troops smashed the van- bound last week—New London, Israel has warned Pales- a known sympathizer of the number of remaining hostages guard of the Cambodian govern- Middletown and Milford—but tinian guerrillas it will im- popular Ftont for the Libera- to “ about 60” after airline offl- ment's first major offensive of there was one new walkout pose the death penalty on tlon of Palestine, which is hold- dais reported 55 persona still the war ^ a y , forcnlg Cambo- casualty—West Haven, 450 sympathizers rounded Ing the hostages, the Nablus' unaccounted for. The Popular dlan - soldiers back after an In Bristol, teachers voted 484- up in occupied Arab ten’i- doctor was one of three Arab Front had claimed Saturday It abortlve attempt to recapture 65 this morning to go back to tories if the remaining hi- emissaries dispatched to Jordan retained only 40 capUyes.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Suit Game Tries and Raises at Bridge Pete Matthews, Jr
    Major Suit Game Tries and Raises at Bridge Pete Matthews, Jr. – http://3nt.xyz – © February 9, 2019 This article started as a fine plan for game tries that proved to be out of date. It then morphed into a comprehensive draft for both game tries and raises of major suit openings, detailing plans that were too complicated for most of us to actually play. Finally, we have a solid, playable plan, presented here in less than half the article. In a case of the tail wagging the dog, the Appendix and the rest of the main text cover alternative methods, tests of game try methods, and related major suit raise situations – in less detail than the foregoing. A discussion of the earlier plan leads to the new plan, which is: jump to game with a good game try, and with a lesser hand, minimize damaging information given to the opponents. For this plan to work well, we need a revamped system of raises, so that the strength of the simple raise is well defined. To some extent, responder makes (or refuses) the game try before opener gets a chance to make one. All recommended methods are acceptable under the ACBL Basic Convention Chart, which both permits any jump response to be a raise of any strength, and permits the 1NT Forcing response. Contents Our Opening Bid is Doubled ..................... 17 Game Tries ......................................................... 2 We Overcall in a Major – Jump Cue Bid ... 17 Game Tries for Standard Raises ...................... 2 After Responder’s Simple Raise ............... 18 Modern Game Tries ....................................... 5 Drury in Competition ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Alert Procedures
    Outdated - for reference only Alert Procedures Introduction The objective of the Alert system is for both pairs at the table to have equal access to all information contained in any auction. In order to meet this goal, it is necessary that all players understand and practice the principles of Full Disclosure and Active Ethics. Ethical bridge players will recognize the obligation to give complete explanations. They will accept the fact that any such information is entirely for the benefit of the opponents, and may not be used to assist their own partnership. This procedure uses the admittedly "fuzzy" terminology of "highly unusual and unexpected" as the best practical solution to simplifying the Alert Procedure. "Highly unusual and unexpected" should be determined in light of historical usage rather than local geographical usage. To ensure full disclosure, however, at the end of the auction and before the opening lead declarers are encouraged to volunteer to explain the auction (including available inferences). According to the Laws of Duplicate Contract Bridge: Law 40.B. Concealed Partnership Understandings Prohibited A player may not make a call or play based on a special partnership understanding unless an opposing pair may reasonably be expected to understand its meaning or unless his side discloses the use of such call or play in accordance with the regulations of the sponsoring organization. Bridge is not a game of secret messages; the auction belongs to everyone at the table. Remember that the opponents are entitled to know the agreed meaning of all calls. The bidding side has an obligation to disclose its agreements according to the procedures established by ACBL.
    [Show full text]
  • Mellon Diamond
    Mellon Diamond Adam Meyerson and Noble Shore November 12, 2003 1 General Principles The Recursive Diamond is a precision-like system, featuring light limited open- ings, weak notrumps, and an artificial forcing bid (1♦). In contrast to precision and many other systems, the focus is on accurate game and partscore bidding rather than finding slams. We tend to enter the auction aggressively on distri- butional hands and our methods emphasize exploring for the best fit rather than setting up an early game force. Our defensive bidding methods similarly em- phasize finding our best fit, showing many types of two-suited hands as quickly as possible. The opening structure of recursive diamond is as follows: 2NT at least 5-5 in the minors, weak (typically 7-10 hcp) 2♥ ♠ weak two 2♣ ♦ intermediate, rule of 20 opener, 6+ cards in bid suit 1NT 10-12 if 1st/2nd NV, else 12-14, can include 5-card major 1♥ ♠ 5 card major, rule of 18 opener, not 5332 shape 1♦ any 16+ hcp; 17+ if balanced and not 1st/2nd seat NV 1♣ 11-16 hcp, balanced or three suiter or minors Bids of 3♣ and above are standard preempts. We frequently preempt three of a minor on reasonable six-card suits, but other three-level preempts are almost always seven. 2 Major Suit Openings Major suit openings at the one level promise five cards in the bid suit. We will treat any 5332 hand with a five card major as balanced, and open in the corresponding notrump range (1NT or 1♣ or 1♦).
    [Show full text]
  • LOOKING for a Marks College Graduation Youth Patrol
    VC*'’-r * .-r % ••» •<' r 1-^v A vei^e Daily Net Frees Run ■ ?. JbV The Week Ended The Weather FRIDAY, JUNE 16, W67 Hot humtd today with scat­ Mlay 20. 19B7 tered thundershowers, high PAGE TWENTY-FOUR near 90, fair,, wlorm tonight, lian tljifiatfr lEoifntttg ll^ ralb low 66-70; fair a Mttle cooler 15,210 tomorrow. Oratty, 48 PMUp Rd., or Edward Manchester— City of Village^ Charm The executive conuniibtee Fund Forming Group Collects Vdilga, 618 WethereH St. V^miTlie Oecoslon Calls for Flowars. About Town Nutmeig Forest, TaM OedaiS ot 1 Think of Th« VOL. LXXXVl, NO. 219 (FOURTEEN PAGIBS— TV SECTION) MANCHESTER, CONN., SATURDAY, JUNE 17, 1967 (Claeslfled Advertising on Page 11) PRICE SEVEN CENTS Leihamon, w4U nveet Monday at For Memorial On Sunday £or K BaccaJaurate Service will '?'30 pjm.- at the Masontc Tem- Measles Cases Reduced Parkhill-Joyce be held Sunday at Center Con- ple- To Miss Taylor Genovesi Fund CHICAGO—Only seven cases gregatlonal Church fw: the 57 ------ of hospitalization due to meas­ graduating seniora of Atanches- The Association of American The parents find children of Funds for the Vincent Geno­ les was reported In Chicago Flower Shop ter High School attending the Dance Oompaniee is having a Nathan Hale School have es- vesi Memorial Library Fund from Nov. 1, 1966, to mid-Feb­ riANCHESTER church. The service is especial- four-day conference tx)day , ^ ^ .u ■ end books for Grades 6, 7 and ruary, 1967. This is attributed IM. ly prepared for the studenU and through Monday in New York^ tatolished a fund to honor the to 121,600 inoculations against 8 wiM be CoHected ^Sunday from fNext to Hartford National Kosygin JJere for Talk, their parents, th e Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridge News" Alpha List 2006-2009
    "Bridge News" Alpha List 2006-2009 2/1 vs. Standard American December 1, 2006 299 Lessons on Dummy Reversal Play May 1, 2009 2NT-2S Relay – Most Dangerous Convention in Bridge January 1, 2009 8 Ever 9 Never Rule July 1, 2007 A Reverse and Responding to a Reverse June 1, 2007 ACBL alert regulations April 1,2009 Advanced Rubinsohl November 1, 2008 An Extended Stayman Convention November 1, 2009 Another Extended Stayman Convention December 1, 2009 Are Systems on or off over a 1-level Major Suit Overcall? January 1,2008 Asking Bids after a Preempt August 1, 2007 Baby Blackwood in Serious 3NT August 1, 2008 Balancing over 1-level bids and Re-opening over 1NT October 1, 2009 Bergen Major Suit Raises November 1, 2006 Bergen Raises over Interference September 1, 2008 Bergen Responses to Gambling 3NT November 1, 2006 Bergen Total Points – The True Value of Your Hand March 1, 2009 Bridge Leads May 1 2007 Bridge Rules & Laws December 1, 2006 Bridge Tips: Overcalls, Principle of Restricted Choice, and Chinese Finesse October 1,2007 Canape Bids – Bridge Note June 1, 2009 Combined Bergen Raises December 1, 2008 Common Bridge Rules/Laws Reviewed March 1, 2008 Concealed Splinters, Scroll Bids with Voids May 1 2007 Counting out the Hand July 1, 2008 Cue Bidding February 1, 2009 Cue Bidding for Slam an Example February 1, 2009 Cue Bidding for Slam with Advice and Bidding Tools March 1, 2009 D.O.N.T. with Monster Hands November 1, 2006 Defending Against Preempts August 1, 2007 Defense against Transfer Bids November 1, 2008 Defense over Forcing Notrump February
    [Show full text]
  • C:\My Documents\CASEBOOK\Adobe
    American Contract Bridge League Presents All That (“Appealing”) Jazz Appeals at the 2003 Fall NABC Edited by Rich Colker ACBL Appeals Administrator Assistant Editor Linda Trent ACBL Appeals Manager CONTENTS Foreword ..................................................... iii The Expert Panel ................................................ v Cases from New Orleans Tempo (Cases 1-15) .......................................... 1 Unauthorized Information (Cases 16-19) ......................... 49 Misinformation (Cases 20-33).................................. 60 Other (Cases 34-37) ........................................ 100 Closing Remarks From the Expert Panelists ......................... 110 Closing Remarks From the Editor ................................. 112 Postscript From the Director of Appeals ............................ 112 Advice for Advancing Players.................................... 113 NABC Appeals Committee ...................................... 114 Abbreviations used in this casebook: AI Authorized Information AWMW Appeal Without Merit Warning BIT Break in Tempo CoC Conditions of Contest CC Convention Card LA Logical Alternative MP Masterpoints MI Misinformation PP Procedural Penalty UI Unauthorized Information i ii FOREWORD We continue our presentation of appeals from NABC tournaments. As always, our goal is to inform, provide constructive criticism and stimulate change (hopefully for the better) in a way that is instructive and entertaining. At NABCs, appeals from non-NABC+ events (including side games, regional events and restricted NABC events) are heard by Director Panels while appeals from unrestricted NABC+ events are heard by the National Appeals Committee (NAC). Both types of cases are reviewed here. Each panelist is sent all cases and invited to comment on as many or as few of them as he wishes. Some panelists may choose not to comment on every case. Table rulings are normally made after consultation among Directors, which typically includes the DIC of the event (who is responsible for the final ruling).
    [Show full text]