(PIF) PROJECT TYPE: Full-Sized Project TYPE of TRUST FUND:GEF Trust Fund
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION FORM (PIF) PROJECT TYPE: Full-sized Project TYPE OF TRUST FUND:GEF Trust Fund PART I: PROJECT IDENTIFICATION Project Title: CBPF-MSL: Strengthening the management effectiveness of the wetland protected area system in Hubei Province Country(ies): People's Republic of China GEF Project ID: 4870 GEF Agency(ies): UNDP GEF Agency Project ID: 4823 Other Executing Forestry Department of Hubei Province Submission Date: April 5, 2012 Partner(s): GEF Focal Area (s): Biodiversity Project Duration (months): 60 Name of parent program: China Biodiversity Partnership Framework and Agency Fee ($): 238,929 For SFM/REDD+ n/a Action Plan (CBPF) and Main Streams of Life - Wetland PA System Strengthening Programme FOCAL AREA STRATEGY FRAMEWORK: Focal Area Expected FA Outcomes Expected FA Outputs Trust Fund Indicative grant Indicative co- Objectives amount ($) financing ($) BD-1 Outcome 1.1: Improved management Output 1. New protected areas (1) GEFTF 2,029,271 16,150,314 effectiveness of existing and new covering 50,000 ha of unprotected protected areas. ecosystems and improved management of existing (200,000 ha) PAs Outcome 1.2: Increased revenue for Output 2. Sustainable financing GEFTF 500,000 1,149,900 protected area systems to meet total plans (1) expenditures required for management. Sub-total 2,529,271 17,300,214 Project management cost GEFTF 125,500 858,420 Total project cost 2,654,771 18,158,634 PROJECT FRAMEWORK: Project Objective: To strengthen the management effectiveness of the wetland protected area system of Hubei province in response to existing and emerging threats to the globally significant biodiversity and essential ecosystem services Trust Indicative Indicative Project Gran Fund Grant co- Expected Outcomes Expected Outputs Component t type Amount financing ($) ($) Enhancing TA . Strengthened provincial . Demonstration of “value of wetland ecosystem GEF 505,800 3,460,000 Provincial development and sector services” including role played in water management TF capacities for planning frameworks at the Province level proven through economic WPA system provides safeguards from valuation of wetland biodiversity and ecosystem management sector practices in and near leading to revised Provincial development and wetland PAs resulting in sectoral planning guidelines that integrates reduction of pressures on implications of wetlands biodiversity and ecosystem wetland biodiversity from services for economic sectors and social welfare tourism, aquaculture and . Provincial PA system financing strengthened agriculture sectors (e.g. through development of mechanisms for balancing wetland incorporating new funding sources from eco- conservation with fishery and compensation initiatives and new financing agriculture production; investments from the public and private sector reducing impacts from especially eco-tourism companies tourism infrastructure and . Sector specific standards and safeguards developed activities) and enforced to protect wetland PAs from . Wetland conservation biodiversity threatening sector practices (e.g. overuse stressed as a mainstream task of fertilizer and pesticides in agriculture, drainage of in the Provincial five year wetlands, inappropriate mining, clear felling in plan and integrated into core forestry etc.) including setting up of regulatory Provincial Forestry Plans standards for tourism development and operation and 1 leads to increased availability issuance of official guidelines for fisheries and of funds from the national aquaculture and establishment of an appropriate and provincial level for coordination mechanism to monitor and enforce wetlands management – implementation. specifically at least 20 % . Linked to above, impact on wetland made mandatory increase in operational funds and used strategically during EIA and CBA studies for Honghu lake NR (from for decision-making on development projects (e.g. the current baseline of US$ dam and major contaminating enterprise 1.5 million) construction, tourism and transportation infrastructure, mining) which may have significant impacts on wetlands . Systems for sharing knowledge and good practices on wetland management within the Provinces established and lessons and knowledge contributed to the MSL programme at the national level Strengthening TA Systems in place for co- . Appropriate basin level consultative coordinating GEF 505,800 3,460,000 basin-level ordination and sound mechanism established (with detailed TORs and TF coordination for management of WPA at operating guidelines) to facilitate decision making on sustainability of basin level that: a) issues that affect WPA such as wise use of water, the WPA establishes a collaborative management of land and other natural resources and system mechanism of water and dam operation to reduce impacts on wetland PA at wetlands resources planning the basin level. This basin coordination mechanism and management; b) will transcend County boundaries and will also entail specifies systems for inter-county coordination as required improving water distribution . Basin wetlands management plan formulated and for economic and ecological implemented that integrate wetland conservation, uses within the basin; c) water supply, flood management and pollution demonstrates integrated mitigation. This plan will: i) set standards to be models for pollution control, achieved such as water quantity and quality, healthy land and other economic wetland ecosystems; ii) establish sustainable water sector management. This allocation for different users; iii) regulate and results in: i) reduction and monitor the impacts from various uses including mitigation of common threats water level and discharge potential monitoring; iv) to the wetlands PA covering elaborate and test appropriate and acceptable cost- a basin area of around sharing mechanisms that underwrite costs of river 332,000 ha increasing basin management (e.g. transfer of resources from sustainability of wetland downstream beneficiaries to the protection and PAs; ii) enables maintenance management of upper catchments – PES) of base flow and water . Systems for sharing knowledge and good practices discharge potentials (baseline on wetland management within the Honghu lake to be established during basin established and joint lessons and knowledge PPG) contributed to the MSL programme at the national level (cross-linked with the component 1 and 3) Reducing on- TA . Improved management . Revised Honghu Lake Nature Reserve management GEF 1,517,671 10,380,214 site threats to effectiveness (measured by plan implemented that provide for: (i) zonation of TF biodiversity at METT) delivers enhanced different uses and management types – as per the the Honghu protection to 9 WPAs national guidelines for WPA developed as part of the Lake NR covering around 200,000 ha national project; (ii) emplace a coordination by strengthening operational mechanism for regulation and management of land capacities of Honghu NR and and natural resources in the adjacent areas in a way adjacent 8 WPAs they are rationalized and in line with reducing . Effective implementation and impacts on the lake; (iii) effective governance and monitoring of PA site law enforcement e.g. to control poaching, wood management plans and harvesting in the adjacent areas and other lake enforcement of laws results resource use (fishing, harvesting of lake / river in reduction of threats (e.g. biomass) infrastructure developments; . Implementation of community co-management of un-sustainable use such as wetland nature reserves comprising i) increased say over-fishing and collection of in the sustainable use and management plans of the aquatic biomass) and NR; ii) strengthened role in collective social ensuing improvement of patrolling, monitoring and enforcement; iii) biodiversity status of the increased benefits from wetland resources wetland NR – as evidenced . Training programmes designed and incorporated into by i) the population of key the curriculum of formal training for Nature Reserve species (e.g. Anatidae water and Provincial Forestry staff on key wetland PA birds) remaining stable or management functions such as: (i) on ecosystem- 2 increase; ii) improvement in based planning and management including 1 biodiversity health index identifying, monitoring, mitigating and reporting on . Strengthened institutional the impact of anthropogenic and natural threats; (ii) and individual staff capacity participatory management, business planning and of Honghu Lake Nature facilitating of income generating activities for local Reserve Authority to manage communities; (iii) law enforcement and conflict wetland PA – as indicated by resolution; (iv) designing and implementing outreach increase in the capacity and awareness activities including wetland PA role scorecard (baselines to be and functions related communication, awareness and established during the PPG) education programmes . Wetland PAs equipped with monitoring facilities (data collection and recording devices) and trained in their use Sub-total 2,529,271 17,300,214 Project management cost GEF/TF 125,500 858,420 Total project costs 2,654,771 18,158,634 INDICATIVE CO-FINANCING FOR THE PROJECT BY SOURCE and BY NAME if available ($) Sources of Co-financing Type of Co- Name of Co-financier Amount ($) for baseline project financing Local Government Hubei Provincial Government Grant 10,238,000 Local Government Hubei Provincial Government In-kind 4,661,060 Local Government Jingzhou Municipal Government Grant 630,000 Local Government Jingzhou Municipal