X-RAY SCALING LAWS for GALAXY CLUSTERS and GROUPS By

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

X-RAY SCALING LAWS for GALAXY CLUSTERS and GROUPS By X-RAY SCALING LAWS FOR GALAXY CLUSTERS AND GROUPS by Donald J. Horner Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2001 Advisory Committee: Professor Richard F. Mushotzky, Advisor Professor Andrew S. Wilson, Chairman Professor Sylvain Veilleux Professor M. Coleman Miller Professor Theodore Jacobson Professor Craig L. Sarazin ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: X-RAY SCALING LAWS FOR GALAXY CLUSTERS AND GROUPS Donald J. Horner, Doctor of Philosophy, 2001 Dissertation directed by: Professor Richard F. Mushotzky Department of Astronomy Scaling laws between galaxy cluster properties, such as the x-ray luminosity{ temperature relation (L{T), the total mass-temperature relation (M{T), and ve- locity dispersion { temperature relation (σ{T) reflect the underlying physics in cluster formation and evolution. The differences between empirically determined and theoretically predicted scaling laws can give useful insights into physical pro- cesses happening in clusters. To determine these scaling laws, we have developed a data reduction pipeline for clusters observed by the ASCA x-ray satellite to cre- ate a sample of 273 clusters and groups with measured x-ray luminosities, average temperatures, and metal abundances. This is the largest such sample yet created and will form a baseline for future studies with improved instruments like Chandra and XMM-Newton. We compare our ASCA cluster catalog to data in the literature to examine some of the biases and systematics that affect measurement of x-ray properties, and illuminate issues that affect the science results derived from such x-ray samples. We derive the L{T relationship over several orders of magnitude in luminosity, from rich clusters to groups. In combination with data from the literature, we examine the M-T relationship for a variety of mass estimators. We then examine the σ{ T relationship and other correlations between the optical and x-ray properties of galaxy clusters. In general, we find that these scaling laws are affected by non- gravitational processes which require additional physics, e.g., energy injection by supernovae. We also see little evolution of galaxy cluster properties with redshift to z ∼ 0:5. c Copyright by Donald J. Horner 2001 Preface This thesis was written under the supervision of Dr. Richard Mushotzky at the Laboratory for High Energy Astrophysics (LHEA) at Goddard Space Flight Cen- ter (GSFC). It is divided into nine chapters and two appendices. The figures in Chapter 2, which reviews x-ray instrumentation and data analysis, are nearly all taken from Appendix E of the ASCA Technical Description. The remaining fig- ures in the chapter were taken from the web site of the High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center (HEASARC). The initial version of the ASCA cluster catalog described in Chapter 3 was created by Dr. Keith Gendreau. Using this as a basis, I rewrote and improved the reduction and analysis routines to the present version described in Chapter 3. Except for parts of Chapter 7 which were previously published as Horner et al. (1999) in collaboration with Dr. Mushotzky and Dr. Caleb Scharf, the rest of the thesis is original work. This thesis has also utilized a number of on-line resources, including data obtained from the High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center (HEASARC), the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED), and NASA's Astrophysics Data System (ADS) Abstract Service. ii DEDICATION To Yanga Rolando Fern´andez-Ponte Martin, who sent me the most postcards. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Richard Mushotzky, for his advice, ideas, and patience. I also need to thank my thesis committee and all the people who read earlier versions of this thesis. It was greatly improved by their comments. At Goddard, I would like to thank Keith Arnaud, Keith Gendreau, and Koji Mukai for answering my many ques- tions about x-ray astronomy, data reduction, and analysis. I also have to thank the WARPS team for giving me the opportunity to become involved in the project, with a special thanks to Caleb Scharf who helped usher me through the early days of my research work. At the University of Maryland, I have to thank John Trasco and Mary Ann Phillips for helping me navigate through the dangerous water of the University and departmental administration. On a more personal note, I would also like to thank my office mates past and present, especially Wayne Baumgartner. I also need to thank Craig Markwardt, not only for his IDL expertise, but also for his sarcasm and Tali Figueroa for also writing his thesis at the same time. It helped to have someone else around dealing with similar pressures. I also thank Steve Fantasia and Mike Arida for not throwing me out when I stopped by their offices for no good reason and for keeping me with candy and gum. A special thanks to everyone in T{Club for the entertainment and cookies over the years, although this is somewhat offset by the repeated mocking. And to Maggie Masetti, I'm sorry you got fired. I would also like to thank fellow (former) graduate students Yan Fer- nandez and Laura Woodney for all the postcards they sent me (not to mention the love and support and all that stuff) and making grad school bearable. Even though they didn't send me as many postcards, I would like to thank Kip Kuntz, Leslie Looney, Arunav Kundu, Neil Nagar, Scott Miller and (most) of the rest of the grad students for their iv friendship. I also thank everyone else who sent me a postcard, espe- cially Barb Mattson, who is truly insane. I also have to mention Robert Greundl, Phil Esterle, and Jim Braatz for helping me get through the first few years of grad school. v TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables x List of Figures xi 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Optical Observations . 3 1.1.1 Catalogs . 3 1.1.2 Morphology and Spatial Distribution . 4 1.1.3 Luminosity Function of Galaxies . 5 1.1.4 Velocity Distribution of Galaxies . 5 1.1.5 Galactic Content of Clusters . 6 1.2 X-ray Observations . 7 1.2.1 Catalogs . 7 1.2.2 The X-ray Spectrum from Hot Plasma . 8 1.2.3 Spatial Distribution of the Gas . 10 1.2.4 Mass Estimates . 10 1.2.5 Cooling Flows . 11 2 X-ray Instrumentation and Data Analysis 13 2.1 The ASCA Satellite . 13 2.1.1 The X-ray Telescope . 14 2.1.2 The SIS . 15 2.1.3 The GIS . 17 2.1.4 Processing of ASCA data . 18 2.2 Other X-ray Astrophysical Missions . 19 2.3 The Basics of Spectral Fitting . 20 3 The ASCA Cluster Catalog 22 3.1 Introduction . 22 3.2 Constructing the Cluster Sample . 23 3.3 Extraction Region Selection . 26 vi 3.4 Reduction of the GIS Data . 28 3.5 Reduction of the SIS Data . 29 3.6 Combining Spectrum Files . 29 3.7 Spectral Fitting . 29 3.8 Luminosity Correction . 30 3.9 Consistency Checks . 32 3.9.1 Multiple Observations . 32 3.9.2 GIS versus SIS . 33 3.9.3 MEKAL versus Raymond-Smith models . 33 3.10 Conclusions . 36 4 Comparison to Other Catalogs 39 4.1 X-ray Temperature . 39 4.1.1 Previous ASCA Results . 39 4.1.2 Non-ASCA Temperatures . 44 4.1.3 Groups . 46 4.2 Metal Abundance . 48 4.2.1 Previous ASCA Results . 48 4.2.2 Non-ASCA Abundances . 50 4.2.3 Groups . 51 4.3 Bolometric Luminosity . 53 4.3.1 Clusters . 53 4.3.2 Groups . 56 4.4 Conclusions . 57 5 Luminosity { Temperature Relation 58 5.1 Introduction . 58 5.2 Theory . 59 5.3 Observations . 60 5.4 The Slope of the Lx − Tx Relation . 61 5.5 Dispersion in the Lx − Tx Relationship . 65 5.5.1 Cooling Flows . 65 5.5.2 Metal Abundance . 69 5.5.3 Central Density . 71 5.5.4 Spatial Distribution . 71 5.6 Redshift Evolution . 73 5.7 Discussion and Conclusions . 74 vii 6 Metal Abundance 78 6.1 Introduction . 78 6.2 Abundance { Temperature Correlation . 79 6.3 Cooling Flows . 81 6.4 Central Density and Core Radius . 84 6.5 Evolution . 84 6.6 Discussion and Conclusions . 86 7 Mass { Temperature Relation 89 7.1 Introduction . 89 7.2 Theory and Simulations . 91 7.3 Virial Theorem Mass Estimates . 92 7.3.1 Scatter in Virial Mass Estimator . 94 7.4 X-ray Mass Estimates . 96 7.4.1 Mass Estimates with Spatially Resolved Temperature Profiles 96 7.4.2 The Isothermal β-model . 98 7.4.3 Surface Brightness Deprojection . 101 7.5 Updated Results . 103 7.5.1 Virial Theorem Mass Estimates . 103 7.5.2 The Isothermal β-model . 104 7.5.3 Mass Estimates with Spatially Resolved Temperature Profiles 104 7.6 Conclusions . 105 8 Optical to X-ray Scaling Laws 107 8.1 Introduction . 107 8.2 Optical Velocity Dispersion . 107 8.2.1 The Velocity Dispersion { Temperature Relation . 109 8.2.2 The Velocity Dispersion { X-ray Luminosity Relation . 110 8.3 Optical Luminosity . 111 8.4 Optical Richness . 114 8.4.1 Abell Richness . 115 8.4.2 Bahcall Richness . 119 8.4.3 Two Point Correlation Function . 119 8.5 Conclusions . 121 9 Summary and Conclusions 123 9.1 Summary of Data Reduction and Analysis . 123 9.2 Summary of Science Results . 124 9.3 Discussion . 126 Appendix 128 viii A Data Tables 128 A.1 Clusters Not Included in the ASCA Sample .
Recommended publications
  • Clusters of Galaxies…
    Budapest University, MTA-Eötvös François Mernier …and the surprisesoftheir spectacularhotatmospheres Clusters ofgalaxies… K complex ) ⇤ Fe ) α [email protected] - Wallon Super - Wallon [email protected] Fe XXVI (Ly (/ Fe XXIV) L complex ) ) (incl. Ne) α α ) Fe ) ) α ) α α ) ) ) ) α ⇥ ) ) ) α α α α α α Si XIV (Ly Mg XII (Ly Ni XXVII / XXVIII Fe XXV (He S XVI (Ly O VIII (Ly Si XIII (He S XV (He Ca XIX (He Ca XX (Ly Fe XXV (He Cr XXIII (He Ar XVII (He Ar XVIII (Ly Mn XXIV (He Ca XIX / XX Yo u are h ere ! 1 km = 103 m Yo u are h ere ! (somewhere behind…) 107 m Yo u are h ere ! (and this is the Moon) 109 m ≃3.3 light seconds Yo u are h ere ! 1012 m ≃55.5 light minutes 1013 m 1014 m Yo u are h ere ! ≃4 light days 1013 m Yo u are h ere ! 1014 m 1017 m ≃10.6 light years 1021 m Yo u are h ere ! ≃106 000 light years 1 million ly Yo u are h ere ! The Local Group Andromeda (M31) 1 million ly Yo u are h ere ! The Local Group Triangulum (M33) 1 million ly Yo u are h ere ! The Local Group 10 millions ly The Virgo Supercluster Virgo cluster 10 millions ly The Virgo Supercluster M87 Virgo cluster 10 millions ly The Virgo Supercluster 2dFGRS Survey The large scale structure of the universe Abell 2199 (429 000 000 light years) Abell 2029 (1.1 billion light years) Abell 2029 (1.1 billion light years) Abell 1689 Abell 1689 (2.2 billion light years) Les amas de galaxies 53 Light emits at optical “colors”… …but also in infrared, radio, …and X-ray! Light emits at optical “colors”… …but also in infrared, radio, …and X-ray! Light emits at optical “colors”…
    [Show full text]
  • PUBLICATIONS Publications (As of Dec 2020): 335 on Refereed Journals, 90 Selected from Non-Refereed Journals. Citations From
    PUBLICATIONS Publications (as of Sep 2021): 350 on refereed journals, 92 selected from non-refereed journals. Citations from ADS: 32263, H-index= 97. Refereed 350. Caminha, G.B.; Suyu, S.H.; Grillo, C.; Rosati, P.; et al. 2021 Galaxy cluster strong lensing cosmography: cosmological constraints from a sample of regular galaxy clusters, submitted to A&A 349. Mercurio, A..; Rosati, P., Biviano, A. et al. 2021 CLASH-VLT: Abell S1063. Cluster assembly history and spectroscopic catalogue, submitted to A&A, (arXiv:2109.03305) 348. G. Granata et al. (9 coauthors including P. Rosati) 2021 Improved strong lensing modelling of galaxy clusters using the Fundamental Plane: the case of Abell S1063, submitted to A&A, (arXiv:2107.09079) 347. E. Vanzella et al. (19 coauthors including P. Rosati) 2021 High star cluster formation efficiency in the strongly lensed Sunburst Lyman-continuum galaxy at z = 2:37, submitted to A&A, (arXiv:2106.10280) 346. M.G. Paillalef et al. (9 coauthors including P. Rosati) 2021 Ionized gas kinematics of cluster AGN at z ∼ 0:8 with KMOS, MNRAS, 506, 385 6 crediti 345. M. Scalco et al. (12 coauthors including P. Rosati) 2021 The HST large programme on Centauri - IV. Catalogue of two external fields, MNRAS, 505, 3549 344. P. Rosati et al. 2021 Synergies of THESEUS with the large facilities of the 2030s and guest observer opportunities, Experimental Astronomy, 2021ExA...tmp...79R (arXiv:2104.09535) 343. N.R. Tanvir et al. (33 coauthors including P. Rosati) 2021 Exploration of the high-redshift universe enabled by THESEUS, Experimental Astronomy, 2021ExA...tmp...97T (arXiv:2104.09532) 342.
    [Show full text]
  • Galaxy Cluster's Rotation
    Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 000{000 (0000) Printed 14 June 2018 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) Galaxy cluster's rotation M. Manolopoulou1;2?, M. Plionis2;3 1 Institute for Astronomy, The University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UK. 2 Section of Astrophysics, Astronomy and Mechanics, Department of Physics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54 124, Thessaloniki, Greece. 3 Instituto Nacional de Astrof´ısica Optica y Electr´onica, AP 51 y 216, 72000, Puebla, M´exico. 14 June 2018 ABSTRACT We study the possible rotation of cluster galaxies, developing, testing and applying a novel algorithm which identifies rotation, if such does exist, as well as its rotational centre, its axis orientation, rotational velocity amplitude and, finally, the clockwise or counterclockwise direction of rotation on the plane of the sky. To validate our algo- rithms we construct realistic Monte Carlo mock rotating clusters and confirm that our method provides robust indications of rotation. We then apply our methodology on a sample of Abell clusters with z . 0:1 with member galaxies selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) DR10 spectroscopic data base. After excluding a number of substructured clusters, which could provide erroneous indications of rotation, and taking into account the expected fraction of misidentified coherent substructure ve- locities for rotation, provided by our Monte-Carlo simulation analysis, we find that ∼ 23% of our clusters are rotating under a set of strict criteria. Loosening the strict- ness of the criteria, on the expense of introducing spurious rotation indications, we find this fraction increasing to ∼ 28%.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide Du Ciel Profond
    Guide du ciel profond Olivier PETIT 8 mai 2004 2 Introduction hjjdfhgf ghjfghfd fg hdfjgdf gfdhfdk dfkgfd fghfkg fdkg fhdkg fkg kfghfhk Table des mati`eres I Objets par constellation 21 1 Androm`ede (And) Andromeda 23 1.1 Messier 31 (La grande Galaxie d'Androm`ede) . 25 1.2 Messier 32 . 27 1.3 Messier 110 . 29 1.4 NGC 404 . 31 1.5 NGC 752 . 33 1.6 NGC 891 . 35 1.7 NGC 7640 . 37 1.8 NGC 7662 (La boule de neige bleue) . 39 2 La Machine pneumatique (Ant) Antlia 41 2.1 NGC 2997 . 43 3 le Verseau (Aqr) Aquarius 45 3.1 Messier 2 . 47 3.2 Messier 72 . 49 3.3 Messier 73 . 51 3.4 NGC 7009 (La n¶ebuleuse Saturne) . 53 3.5 NGC 7293 (La n¶ebuleuse de l'h¶elice) . 56 3.6 NGC 7492 . 58 3.7 NGC 7606 . 60 3.8 Cederblad 211 (N¶ebuleuse de R Aquarii) . 62 4 l'Aigle (Aql) Aquila 63 4.1 NGC 6709 . 65 4.2 NGC 6741 . 67 4.3 NGC 6751 (La n¶ebuleuse de l’œil flou) . 69 4.4 NGC 6760 . 71 4.5 NGC 6781 (Le nid de l'Aigle ) . 73 TABLE DES MATIERES` 5 4.6 NGC 6790 . 75 4.7 NGC 6804 . 77 4.8 Barnard 142-143 (La tani`ere noire) . 79 5 le B¶elier (Ari) Aries 81 5.1 NGC 772 . 83 6 le Cocher (Aur) Auriga 85 6.1 Messier 36 . 87 6.2 Messier 37 . 89 6.3 Messier 38 .
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2105.11583V2 [Astro-Ph.EP] 2 Jul 2021 Keck-HIRES, APF-Levy, and Lick-Hamilton Spectrographs
    Draft version July 6, 2021 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX63 The California Legacy Survey I. A Catalog of 178 Planets from Precision Radial Velocity Monitoring of 719 Nearby Stars over Three Decades Lee J. Rosenthal,1 Benjamin J. Fulton,1, 2 Lea A. Hirsch,3 Howard T. Isaacson,4 Andrew W. Howard,1 Cayla M. Dedrick,5, 6 Ilya A. Sherstyuk,1 Sarah C. Blunt,1, 7 Erik A. Petigura,8 Heather A. Knutson,9 Aida Behmard,9, 7 Ashley Chontos,10, 7 Justin R. Crepp,11 Ian J. M. Crossfield,12 Paul A. Dalba,13, 14 Debra A. Fischer,15 Gregory W. Henry,16 Stephen R. Kane,13 Molly Kosiarek,17, 7 Geoffrey W. Marcy,1, 7 Ryan A. Rubenzahl,1, 7 Lauren M. Weiss,10 and Jason T. Wright18, 19, 20 1Cahill Center for Astronomy & Astrophysics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 2IPAC-NASA Exoplanet Science Institute, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 3Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 4Department of Astronomy, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 5Cahill Center for Astronomy & Astrophysics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 6Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, The Pennsylvania State University, 525 Davey Lab, University Park, PA 16802, USA 7NSF Graduate Research Fellow 8Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA 9Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 10Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawai`i,
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting the Cooling Flow Problem in Galaxies, Groups, and Clusters of Galaxies
    Revisiting the Cooling Flow Problem in Galaxies, Groups, and Clusters of Galaxies The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation McDonald, Michael et. al., "Revisiting the Cooling Flow Problem in Galaxies, Groups, and Clusters of Galaxies." Astrophysical Journal 858, 1 (May 2018): no. 45 doi. 10.3847/1538-4357/AABACE ©2018 Authors As Published 10.3847/1538-4357/AABACE Publisher American Astronomical Society Version Final published version Citable link https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/125311 Terms of Use Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use. The Astrophysical Journal, 858:45 (15pp), 2018 May 1 https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aabace © 2018. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Revisiting the Cooling Flow Problem in Galaxies, Groups, and Clusters of Galaxies M. McDonald1 , M. Gaspari2,5 , B. R. McNamara3 , and G. R. Tremblay4 1 Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, 4 Ivy Lane, Princeton, NJ 08544-1001, USA 3 Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Canada 4 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Received 2018 January 6; revised 2018 March 13; accepted 2018 March 27; published 2018 May 3 Abstract We present a study of 107 galaxies, groups, and clusters spanning ∼3 orders of magnitude in mass, ∼5 orders of magnitude in central galaxy star formation rate (SFR), ∼4 orders of magnitude in the classical cooling rate (MMrrt˙ coolº< gas() cool cool) of the intracluster medium (ICM), and ∼5 orders of magnitude in the central black hole accretion rate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Luminosity Function of the Milky Way Satellites
    Draft version June 3, 2018 A Preprint typeset using LTEX style emulateapj v. 02/07/07 THE LUMINOSITY FUNCTION OF THE MILKY WAY SATELLITES S. Koposov1,2, V. Belokurov2, N.W. Evans2, P.C. Hewett2, M.J. Irwin2, G. Gilmore2, D.B. Zucker2, H.-W. Rix1, M. Fellhauer2, E.F. Bell1, E.V. Glushkova3 Draft version June 3, 2018 ABSTRACT We quantify the detectability of stellar Milky Way satellites in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) Data Release 5. We show that the effective search volumes for the recently discovered SDSS–satellites depend strongly on their luminosity, with their maximum distance, Dmax, substantially smaller than the Milky Way halo’s virial radius. Calculating the maximum accessible volume, Vmax, for all faint detected satellites, allows the calculation of the luminosity function for Milky Way satellite galaxies, accounting quantitatively for their detectability. We find that the number density of satellite galaxies continues to rise towards low luminosities, but may flatten at MV 5; within the uncertainties, the ∼− 0.1(MV +5) luminosity function can be described by a single power law dN/dMV = 10 10 , spanning × luminosities from MV = 2 all the way to the luminosity of the Large Magellanic Cloud. Comparing these results to several semi-analytic− galaxy formation models, we find that their predictions differ significantly from the data: either the shape of the luminosity function, or the surface brightness distributions of the models, do not match. Subject headings: Galaxy: halo – Galaxy: structure – Galaxy: formation – Local Group 1. INTRODUCTION ing satellite” problem. First identified by Klypin et al. In Cold Dark Matter (CDM) models, large spiral (1999) and Moore et al.
    [Show full text]
  • General Disclaimer One Or More of the Following Statements May Affect This Document
    General Disclaimer One or more of the Following Statements may affect this Document This document has been reproduced from the best copy furnished by the organizational source. It is being released in the interest of making available as much information as possible. This document may contain data, which exceeds the sheet parameters. It was furnished in this condition by the organizational source and is the best copy available. This document may contain tone-on-tone or color graphs, charts and/or pictures, which have been reproduced in black and white. This document is paginated as submitted by the original source. Portions of this document are not fully legible due to the historical nature of some of the material. However, it is the best reproduction available from the original submission. Produced by the NASA Center for Aerospace Information (CASI) N79-28092 (NASA-T"1-80294) A SEARCH FOR X-RAY FM13STON FROM RICH CLUSTF.'+S, F.XTFNt1Et'• F1ALOS AWIND CLUSTERS, AND SUPERCLUSTERS (NASA) 37 p rinclas HC AOl/ N F A01 CSCL 038 G3/90 29952 Technical Memorandum 80294 A Search for X- Ray Emission from Riche Clusters, Extended Halos around Clusters, and Superclusters S. H. Pravdo, E. A. Boldt, F. E. Marshall, J. Mc Kee, R. F. Mushotzky, B. W. Smith, and G. Reichert JUNE 1979 A Naticnal Aeronautics and Snn,^ Administration "` Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, Maryland 20771 A SEARCH FOR X-RAY EMISSION FROM RICH CLUSTERS, EXTENDED HALOS AROUND CLUSTERS, ANU SUPERCLUSTERS • S.H Pravdo E A Boldt, F.E Marshall J. McKee R.F Mushotzky , B.W.
    [Show full text]
  • X-Ray Jets Aneta Siemiginowska
    Chandra News Issue 21 Spring 2014 Published by the Chandra X-ray Center (CXC) X-ray Jets Aneta Siemiginowska The Active Galaxy 4C+29.30 Credit: X-ray: NASA/CXC/SAO/A.Siemiginowska et al; Optical: NASA/STScI; Radio: NSF/NRAO/VLA Contents X-ray Jets HETG 3 Aneta Siemiginowska 18 David Huenemoerder (for the HETG team) 10 Project Scientist’s Report 20 LETG Martin Weisskopf Jeremy Drake 11 Project Manager’s Report 23 Chandra Calibration Roger Brissenden Larry David Message of Thanks to Useful Web Addresses 12 Harvey Tananbaum 23 The Chandra Team Belinda Wilkes Appointed as CIAO 4.6 13 Director of the CXC 24 Antonella Fruscione, for the CIAO Team Of Programs and Papers: Einstein Postdoctoral Fellowship 13 Making the Chandra Connection 29 Program Sherry Winkelman & Arnold Rots Andrea Prestwich Chandra Related Meetings Cycle 14 Peer Review Results 14 and Important Dates 30 Belinda Wilkes ACIS Chandra Users’ Committee 14 Paul Plucinsky, Royce Buehler, 34 Membership List Gregg Germain, & Richard Edgar HRC CXC 2013 Science Press 15 Ralph Kraft, Hans Moritz Guenther 35 Releases (SAO), and Wolfgang Pietsch (MPE) Megan Watzke The Chandra Newsletter appears once a year and is edited by Paul J. Green, with editorial assistance and layout by Evan Tingle. We welcome contributions from readers. Comments on the newsletter, or corrections and additions to the hardcopy mailing list should be sent to: [email protected]. Spring, 2014 3 X-ray Jets many unanswered questions, including the nature of relativistic jets, jet energetics, particle content, parti- Aneta Siemiginowska cle acceleration and emission processes. Both statis- tical studies of large samples of jets across the entire The first recorded observation of an extragalac- electromagnetic spectrum and deep broad-band imag- tic jet was made almost a century ago.
    [Show full text]
  • And Ecclesiastical Cosmology
    GSJ: VOLUME 6, ISSUE 3, MARCH 2018 101 GSJ: Volume 6, Issue 3, March 2018, Online: ISSN 2320-9186 www.globalscientificjournal.com DEMOLITION HUBBLE'S LAW, BIG BANG THE BASIS OF "MODERN" AND ECCLESIASTICAL COSMOLOGY Author: Weitter Duckss (Slavko Sedic) Zadar Croatia Pусскй Croatian „If two objects are represented by ball bearings and space-time by the stretching of a rubber sheet, the Doppler effect is caused by the rolling of ball bearings over the rubber sheet in order to achieve a particular motion. A cosmological red shift occurs when ball bearings get stuck on the sheet, which is stretched.“ Wikipedia OK, let's check that on our local group of galaxies (the table from my article „Where did the blue spectral shift inside the universe come from?“) galaxies, local groups Redshift km/s Blueshift km/s Sextans B (4.44 ± 0.23 Mly) 300 ± 0 Sextans A 324 ± 2 NGC 3109 403 ± 1 Tucana Dwarf 130 ± ? Leo I 285 ± 2 NGC 6822 -57 ± 2 Andromeda Galaxy -301 ± 1 Leo II (about 690,000 ly) 79 ± 1 Phoenix Dwarf 60 ± 30 SagDIG -79 ± 1 Aquarius Dwarf -141 ± 2 Wolf–Lundmark–Melotte -122 ± 2 Pisces Dwarf -287 ± 0 Antlia Dwarf 362 ± 0 Leo A 0.000067 (z) Pegasus Dwarf Spheroidal -354 ± 3 IC 10 -348 ± 1 NGC 185 -202 ± 3 Canes Venatici I ~ 31 GSJ© 2018 www.globalscientificjournal.com GSJ: VOLUME 6, ISSUE 3, MARCH 2018 102 Andromeda III -351 ± 9 Andromeda II -188 ± 3 Triangulum Galaxy -179 ± 3 Messier 110 -241 ± 3 NGC 147 (2.53 ± 0.11 Mly) -193 ± 3 Small Magellanic Cloud 0.000527 Large Magellanic Cloud - - M32 -200 ± 6 NGC 205 -241 ± 3 IC 1613 -234 ± 1 Carina Dwarf 230 ± 60 Sextans Dwarf 224 ± 2 Ursa Minor Dwarf (200 ± 30 kly) -247 ± 1 Draco Dwarf -292 ± 21 Cassiopeia Dwarf -307 ± 2 Ursa Major II Dwarf - 116 Leo IV 130 Leo V ( 585 kly) 173 Leo T -60 Bootes II -120 Pegasus Dwarf -183 ± 0 Sculptor Dwarf 110 ± 1 Etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Counting Gamma Rays in the Directions of Galaxy Clusters
    A&A 567, A93 (2014) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322454 & c ESO 2014 Astrophysics Counting gamma rays in the directions of galaxy clusters D. A. Prokhorov1 and E. M. Churazov1,2 1 Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, Karl-Schwarzschild-Strasse 1, 85741 Garching, Germany e-mail: [email protected] 2 Space Research Institute (IKI), Profsouznaya 84/32, 117997 Moscow, Russia Received 6 August 2013 / Accepted 19 May 2014 ABSTRACT Emission from active galactic nuclei (AGNs) and from neutral pion decay are the two most natural mechanisms that could establish a galaxy cluster as a source of gamma rays in the GeV regime. We revisit this problem by using 52.5 months of Fermi-LAT data above 10 GeV and stacking 55 clusters from the HIFLUCGS sample of the X-ray brightest clusters. The choice of >10 GeV photons is optimal from the point of view of angular resolution, while the sample selection optimizes the chances of detecting signatures of neutral pion decay, arising from hadronic interactions of relativistic protons with an intracluster medium, which scale with the X-ray flux. In the stacked data we detected a signal for the central 0.25 deg circle at the level of 4.3σ. Evidence for a spatial extent of the signal is marginal. A subsample of cool-core clusters has a higher count rate of 1.9 ± 0.3 per cluster compared to the subsample of non-cool core clusters at 1.3 ± 0.2. Several independent arguments suggest that the contribution of AGNs to the observed signal is substantial, if not dominant.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Properties of the X-Ray Gas As a Dynamical Diagnosis for Galaxy
    MNRAS 000, 1–24 (2019) Preprint 7 February 2019 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 Physical properties of the X-ray gas as a dynamical diagnosis for galaxy clusters T. F. Lagan´a,1⋆ F. Durret2 and P. A. A. Lopes3 1NAT, Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul, Rua Galv˜ao Bueno, 868, CEP:01506-000, S˜ao Paulo-SP, Brazil 2 Sorbonne Universit´e, CNRS, UMR 7095, Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, 98bis Bd Arago, F-75014 Paris, France. 3 Observat´orio do Valongo, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Ladeira do Pedro Antˆonio 43, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 20080-090, Brazil Accepted 2018 December 19. Received 2018 December 17; in original form 2018 November 29. ABSTRACT We analysed XMM-Newton EPIC data for 53 galaxy clusters. Through 2D spec- tral maps, we provide the most detailed and extended view of the spatial distribution of temperature (kT), pressure (P), entropy (S) and metallicity (Z) of galaxy clusters to date with the aim of correlating the dynamical state of the system to six cool-core diagnoses from the literature. With the objective of building 2D maps and resolving structures in kT, P, S and Z, we divide the data in small regions from which spectra can be extracted. Our analysis shows that when clusters are spherically symmetric the cool-cores (CC) are preserved, the systems are relaxed with little signs of perturbation, and most of the CC criteria agree. The disturbed clusters are elongated, show clear signs of interaction in the 2D maps, and most do not have a cool-core.
    [Show full text]