DOCSLIB.ORG

Living with Wildlife in Anchorage: a Cooperative Planning Effort

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Living with Wildlife in Anchorage: a Cooperative Planning Effort Living with Wildlife in Anchorage: A Cooperative Planning Effort April, 2000 BOB HALLINEN/ANCHORAGE DAILY NEWS April 24, 2000 Dear Reader: This plan captures the results of a pioneering effort, led by the Alaska Department of Fish & Game, to help Anchorage residents and visitors co-exist with the multitude of wildlife living in and around the nation's seventieth-largest city. No other city of its size boasts the number and diversity of wild animals found throughout the Municipality of Anchorage, a point of pride to most residents and a major factor in their quality of life. Managing wildlife in an urban setting is extremely complicated and challenging, however. There are numerous competing interests to consider, as well as serious safety concerns. The public and a wide array of local, state, military and federal organizations worked together to develop this Plan, at considerable cost of time and effort over the past three years. It is an accomplishment of which every participant, including the members of the public who generously shared their time and thoughts, can be proud. The plan is referenced in Anchorage 2020: The Anchorage Bowl Comprehensive Plan, an action strongly supported by all of the contributing organizations. Adding a wildlife component to the master plan that will guide Anchorage's development over the next several decades helps to ensure that wildlife remains an integral part of life in Alaska's largest city. And, because the comprehensive plan is revised and updated on a regular basis, it provides the incentive and flexibility for similar revisions regarding wildlife. Given the unique nature of this planning effort, I think you will agree with me that this first edition of Living with Wildlife in Anchorage: A Cooperative Planning Effort represents a bold first step in assuring the conservation of wildlife in Anchorage for the benefit of its residents. Sincerely, Frank Rue Commissioner Acknowledgments Development of this plan would not have been possible without the commitment of many agencies and organizations which worked together over the past three years to address the wildlife issues of Anchorage. The full list of participants is included in Chapter 2, and speaks to the broad array of organizations and agencies who claim a stake in the future of Anchorage's wildlife, and who contributed substantively to this plan. Individuals and agencies deserving recognition for their valuable, substantive contributions to the plan, as well as their perseverance, include (in no particular order): Malcolm Ford of the Anchorage Audubon Society; Karen Deatherage of the Alaska Wildlife Alliance; Evie Witten of The Great Land Trust; Ray Reekie and Patrick Wright of the Anchorage Fish & Game Advisory Committee; Thede Tobish of the Municipality of Anchorage, Community Planning & Development; Judi Ramage of the Chugach State Park Advisory Board; Al Meiners, Superintendent of Chugach State Park; Kate Wedemeyer and Tom Liebscher of U.S. Air Force, Elmendorf Air Force Base; Bill Gossweiler and Laurie Angell of U.S. Army, Ft. Richardson; and Karen Laing and Maureen de Zeeuw of the U.S. Fish and Widlife Service. These representatives consistently offered valuable insight and contributions to the substance of the plan, and gave freely of their materials, time and good will at public meetings. Their expertise, dedication and patience are sincerely appreciated. We extend our special thanks to several individuals: * to David Fulton (Alaska Department of Fish and Game) who structured the process, formed the group, and led the process through its first, critical year; * to Maureen de Zeeuw (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service), who gave generously of her time to incorporate photographs and professionally edit the manuscript; * to Rick Sinnott (Alaska Department of Fish and Game), who shared his considerable expertise as Anchorage's Area Biologist; * to Jonne Slemons (Alaska Department of Fish and Game), who managed the project; and * to Doug Whittaker (Three Rivers Research, Inc.), who led the group and the process during the final two productive years, who maintained focus in the maelstrom, and who "brought it all together," writing the lion's share of the final manuscript. Finally, we would like to thank the many members of the Anchorage public who attended both working meetings and public meetings; who took the time to call and write with their comments and suggestions; and for whom this plan is written. Page ii Living with Wildlife in AnchorageAnchorage:: AA CooperativeCooperative PlanningPlanning EffortEffort Table of Contents Cover letter from Alaska Department of Fish and Game Commissioner.............................................. i Acknowledgments……………………………………………………………………………………….ii Table of contents .......................................................................................................................... iii List of figures, maps and photos...................................................................................................... v Chapter 1: Introduction.................................................................................................................. 1 Why does Anchorage need a wildlife plan? ......................................................................... 2 Plan purpose...................................................................................................................... 4 Geographic area ................................................................................................................ 4 Plan limitations.................................................................................................................. 6 Relationship between this plan and other plans .................................................................... 7 Organization of this document ............................................................................................ 8 Chapter 2: The Planning Process ................................................................................................... 9 A chronology of the planning effort .................................................................................... 9 Steps in the process ......................................................................................................... 10 Agency and group participation ........................................................................................ 11 Public involvement .......................................................................................................... 12 Planning principles .......................................................................................................... 13 Chapter 3: Plan Goals and Objectives........................................................................................... 15 Overall goal..................................................................................................................... 15 Goals and objectives ........................................................................................................ 15 Chapter 4: Wildlife in Anchorage, 1999 ....................................................................................... 17 Wildlife issues and concerns ............................................................................................ 17 A summary of Anchorage’s wildlife.................................................................................. 20 General values and attitudes toward Anchorage wildlife..................................................... 37 Wildlife conflict statistics and standards............................................................................ 40 Chapter 5: Wildlife Population Management and Conflict Response Actions .................................. 45 Wildlife population management recommendations ........................................................... 45 Moose population management............................................................................. 45 Bear population management................................................................................ 49 Canada goose population management .................................................................. 50 Non-native and feral animal population management ............................................. 52 Wildlife conflict responses............................................................................................... 54 Overall ADF&G conflict response principles......................................................... 54 ADF&G moose conflict response policies ............................................................. 55 Page iii Table of Contents . ADF&G bear conflict response policies ................................................................ 57 Additional bear conflict policies and information ................................................... 59 ADF&G responses to conflicts with beavers.......................................................... 60 ADF&G responses to conflicts with other mammal species .................................... 60 Bird conflict response policy ................................................................................ 61 Some final notes on wildlife conflicts.................................................................... 62 Chapter 6: Priority Actions .......................................................................................................... 63 List of top priority and supported actions..........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Captive Orcas
    Captive Orcas ‘Dying to Entertain You’ The Full Story A report for Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society (WDCS) Chippenham, UK Produced by Vanessa Williams Contents Introduction Section 1 The showbiz orca Section 2 Life in the wild FINgerprinting techniques. Community living. Social behaviour. Intelligence. Communication. Orca studies in other parts of the world. Fact file. Latest news on northern/southern residents. Section 3 The world orca trade Capture sites and methods. Legislation. Holding areas [USA/Canada /Iceland/Japan]. Effects of capture upon remaining animals. Potential future capture sites. Transport from the wild. Transport from tank to tank. “Orca laundering”. Breeding loan. Special deals. Section 4 Life in the tank Standards and regulations for captive display [USA/Canada/UK/Japan]. Conditions in captivity: Pool size. Pool design and water quality. Feeding. Acoustics and ambient noise. Social composition and companionship. Solitary confinement. Health of captive orcas: Survival rates and longevity. Causes of death. Stress. Aggressive behaviour towards other orcas. Aggression towards trainers. Section 5 Marine park myths Education. Conservation. Captive breeding. Research. Section 6 The display industry makes a killing Marketing the image. Lobbying. Dubious bedfellows. Drive fisheries. Over-capturing. Section 7 The times they are a-changing The future of marine parks. Changing climate of public opinion. Ethics. Alternatives to display. Whale watching. Cetacean-free facilities. Future of current captives. Release programmes. Section 8 Conclusions and recommendations Appendix: Location of current captives, and details of wild-caught orcas References The information contained in this report is believed to be correct at the time of last publication: 30th April 2001. Some information is inevitably date-sensitive: please notify the author with any comments or updated information.
    [Show full text]
  • ANWR: the Legislative Quagmire Surrounding Stakeholder Control and Protection, and the Practical Consequences of Allowing Exploration
    Buffalo Environmental Law Journal Volume 9 Number 2 Article 3 4-1-2002 ANWR: The Legislative Quagmire Surrounding Stakeholder Control and Protection, and the Practical Consequences of Allowing Exploration Kristofer Pasquale University of Idaho College of Law (Student) Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/belj Part of the Legislation Commons, and the Natural Resources Law Commons Recommended Citation Kristofer Pasquale, ANWR: The Legislative Quagmire Surrounding Stakeholder Control and Protection, and the Practical Consequences of Allowing Exploration, 9 Buff. Envtl. L.J. 245 (2002). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.buffalo.edu/belj/vol9/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Buffalo Environmental Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ University at Buffalo School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ANWR: THE LEGISLATIVE QUAGMIRE SURROUNDING STAKEHOLDER CONTROL AND PROTECTION, AND THE PRACTICAL CONSEQUENCES OF ALLOWING EXPLORATION Kristofer Pasquale* Introduction Along the freezing northern region of Alaska's coast lies approximately twenty million acres of land known as the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, or better known by its acronym, ANWR. For the last thirty years, battles have raged between the state and the federal government, between environmentalists and oil companies, and between a variety of other stakeholders for control over the future of development of ANWR for oil exploration and production.' The ongoing, contentious debate on whether to explore and drill for oil in ANWR is at the forefront of national policy, concerning environ- mentalists and peaking oil industry interest still today.2 This comment explores the legislative history behind what has become ANWR, identifies possible stakeholders in the question of how ANWR should be treated, and analyzes the effect that exploration would have upon them.
    [Show full text]
  • Hhiiissstttooorrriiicccaaalll Hhaaappppppeeennniiinnngggsss
    UUU...SSS... FFFiiissshhh &&& WWWiiillldddllliiifffeee SSSeeerrrvvviiiccceee NNNooovvveeemmmbbbeeerrr 222000000999 HHHiiissstttooorrriiicccaalll HHHaaappppppeeennniiinnngggsss NNNooottteeesss ooonnn CCCuuullltttuuurrraaalll RRReeesssooouuurrrccceee MMMaaannnaaagggeeemmmeeennnttt iiinnn ttthhheee UUU...SSS... FFFiiissshhh aaannnddd WWWiiillldddllliiifffeee SSSeeerrrvvviiiccceee Historical Happenings provides information on the USFWS Cultural Resources Management program. Information comes from sources such as the Regional Historic Preservation Officers, websites, new sources, as well as other cultural resource management professionals. Issues are also available on the USFWS Cultural Resources website http://historicpreservation.fws.gov. Submissions are encouraged and can be made via email. Please contact Eugene Marino at [email protected] for submission guidelines. Wonderful Things A look at FWS Museum Property FWS Regional News: Robert Hines and the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 6 Archaeology and Conservation Robert Hines (1912-1994) was the only USFWS permanent employee hired as such to be a full-time artist. His official title was National Wildlife Artist. He worked from the Biology—A Rewarding Partnership Washington, D.C. office, and throughout his career, illustrated 2 wildlife art series (one on birds, and one on the wildlife of Alaska). He made educational posters, and large scale oil Large mammal bones were found in 1971 paintings to hang in refuge and regional offices. He was the artist on two duck stamps, on what
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Park Science. Volume 14, Issue 2
    Alaska Park Science National Park Service U.S. Department of Interior Alaska Regional Office Anchorage, Alaska Birds of Alaska’s National Parks In this issue: Critical Connections: Conserving Migratory Birds 16 Black Oystercatchers in Kenai Fjords National Park 22 Glaucous-winged Gull Monitoring and Egg Harvest in Glacier Bay 34 ...and more. Volume 14, Issue 2 Table of Contents Swan Song ________________________________________________________________ 6 Avian Soundscape Ecology in Denali National Park and Preserve _______________ 8 Critical Connections: Conserving Migratory Birds in Alaska’s National Parks _______________________ 16 Black Oystercatchers in Kenai Fjords National Park: A Keystone of the Intertidal Zone __________________________________________ 22 Conserving Migratory Golden Eagles in a Rapidly Changing World: What Role Will the NPS Play? ______________________________________________ 28 Glaucous-winged Gull Monitoring and Egg Harvest in Glacier Bay, Alaska ______________________________________________________ 34 Birds of the Arctic—Simon Paneak and Laurence Irving: Collaborators in Arctic Research ____________________________________________ 40 The Birds of Bob Uhl’s Journals _____________________________________________ 46 Birding is for Everyone! ___________________________________________________ 52 Looking Back—A Heady Time for National Park Service Science in Alaska _____________________________________ 56 Cover photo: A black oyster catcher in Kenai Fjords National Park protects its eggs. NPS photo 2 National Park
    [Show full text]
  • Tundra Swans
    Fish and Wildlife of Alaska’s North Slope TUNDRA SWANS ince 1986, ConocoPhillips scientists and industry consultants have conducted a variety of wildlife studies in the oilfield region of the Alaskan North Slope. S ConocoPhillips has chosen tundra swans (Cygnus columbianus or qugruk) for long-term monitoring to assure their well-being and also to use them as an indicator of the overall health of the abundant waterfowl and shorebird communities that use the oil- fields. Included in this work has been studies of the waterfowl and shorebirds that use the oilfields in summer for feeding, nesting, and raising their young. Tundra swans are common nesters in the North Slope oilfields, they generally mate for life, and they are sensitive to disturbance within their nesting territories. There are about 200,000 tundra swans in North America, approxi- mately half of which winter in Cali- fornia and half on the Atlantic Coast. The North Slope swans are at the western extreme of the east- ern wintering population that nest Tundra swan (Cygnus columbianus or qugruk). from northern Alaska across Arctic Canada to Hudson’s Bay. After a remarkable journey southeast in the fall, the North Slope swans winter in Chesapeake Bay, sometimes within sight of the Washington Monument, and in coastal sections of Maryland, Virginia, and North Carolina. They provide bird watchers with much-valued winter viewing in a number of areas and are hunted in some places. Tundra swans are one of the first birds to arrive on the Arctic Coastal Plain each spring. Often swans arrive in mid-May when ice and snow are still melting and soon begin nesting.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 North Slope Best Interest Finding
    April 18, 2018 Final Finding of the Director Recommended citation: ADNR (Alaska Department of Natural Resources). 2018. North Slope areawide oil and gas lease sales. Written Finding of the Director. April 18, 2018. Questions or comments about this final finding should be directed to: Alaska Department of Natural Resources Division of Oil and Gas 550 W. 7th Ave., Suite 1100 Anchorage, AK 99501-3560 Phone 907-269-8800 The Alaska Department of Natural Resources (ADNR) administers all programs and activities free from discrimination based on race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, marital status, pregnancy, parenthood, or disability. The department administers all programs and activities in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility please write to: ADNR ADA Coordinator P.O. Box 111000 Juneau AK 99811-1000 The department’s ADA Coordinator can be reached via phone at the following numbers: (VOICE) 907-465-2400, (Statewide Telecommunication Device for the Deaf) 1-800-770-8973, or (FAX) 907-465-3886 For information on alternative formats and questions on this publication, please contact: ADNR, Division of Oil and Gas 550 W. 7th Ave., Suite 1100 Anchorage, AK 99501-3560 Phone 907-269-8800. Division of Oil and Gas Contributors: Shawana Guzenski Jonathan Schick Kyle Smith Final Finding of the Director Prepared by: Alaska Department of Natural Resources Division of Oil and Gas April 18, 2018 Contents Page Chapter One: Director’s Final Written Finding and Decision 1-1 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Experience the Best of Alaska and Canada by Land and Sea
    2014 2014 20142014 20152014 20152014 20152015 20152015 20152015 20142015 20142015 2014 2014 “GOLD “CRUISE“GOLD “GOLD“GOLD “GOLD“GOLD “GOLD“GOLD “GOLD“GOLD “GOLD “GOLD “CRUISE AWARD FOR AWARD FOR “AWARDAWARD OFFOR AWARD“BEST FOR “AWARD“MOST OF “BEST “MOST LINE OF AWARD FOR AWARDLINE OFFOR AWARDAWARD FOR FOR AWARD FOR AWARDAWARD FOR FOR AWARD FOR SPA DESIGN” ATRIUM DESIGN” ENTERTAINMENT”SPA DESIGN” SUITEATRIUM DESIGN” DESIGN” ENTERTAINMENT”RESTAURANT RESTAURANTSUITE DESIGN” EXCELLENCE”RESTAURANT NIGHTLIFE”RESTAURANT INNOVATIVEEXCELLENCE” NIGHTLIFE”2016 INNOVATIVE 2016 THE YEAR” PREMIUM SHIP CATEGORY PREMIUMTHE SHIP YEAR” CATEGORY PREMIUM PREMIUM SHIP SHIP CATEGORY CATEGORY PREMIUM PREMIUM SHIP SHIP CATEGORY CATEGORY PREMIUMDESIGN” SHIP CATEGORY PREMIUMDESIGN” SHIP CATEGORY CELEBRITYDESIGN” CRUISES’ DESIGN” CELEBRITYCABINS” CRUISES’ CABINS” Reflection Suite Reflection Suite ALL 10 MAIN RESTAURANTS ALL 10 MAIN RESTAURANTS Canyon Ranch SpaClub® GrandTTG Foyer, CanyoniMagic, Ranch The ShowSpaClub® Grand Foyer, PREMIUMiMagic, SHIP The CATEGORY Show PREMIUM SHIP CATEGORY PREMIUM SHIP CATEGORY PREMIUMBon Voyage’s SHIP CATEGORY Bon Voyage’s TTG Celebrity Reflection® Celebrity Reflection® BonWine Voyage’s Spectator Bon Voyage’s Celebrity Reflection® Travel Weekly’s Celebrity Reflection® Tuscan Grille Blu WineTuscan Spectator Grille Editor’s BluChoice Editor’s Choice V.6 Travel Awards Travel Weekly’s Travel Awards Travel Weekly’s Travel Weekly’s Travel Weekly’s Travel Weekly’s Restaurant Restaurant V.6 Editor’s Choice Travel Weekly’s Magellan Travel
    [Show full text]
  • Trustees for the Parks Trustees for the Parks
    TRUSTEES FOR THE PARKS NEWSLETTER NEWSLETTERSUMMER/FALL SUMMER 2020 2018 BLACK CANYON OF THE GUNNISON NATIONAL PARK (CO) Dalton Highway , AK © Paul Seibert THE WESTERN ARCTIC CARIBOU ON THE ROAD CARIBOU HERD IS THREATENED BY A TO RUIN? PROPOSED MINING ROAD Not on your watch THAT WOULD rom time immemorial, caribou public lands, including portions of CUT THROUGH A VAST have migrated across the Alaska Gates of the Arctic National Park and Ftundra and played a critical Preserve. Nearly 3,000 rivers and SWATH OF THE HERD’S role in the Arctic ecosystem as well as streams would be disturbed by the the lives of Alaska Native people. The road, which would act like a dam for MIGRATION RANGE. hardy and graceful animals transport thousands of acres of tundra wetlands. nutrients across the tundra while The road would expose one of the providing the people of the region world’s last wild and intact landscapes with meat for sustenance and skins for to industrial exploitation. warmth. NPCA has led opposition to the Ambler The Western Arctic Caribou Herd’s mining road since it was initially very survival, however, is threatened proposed more than six years ago. Our by a proposed mining road that would fight to save caribou and other Alaskan cut through a vast swath of the herd’s wildlife important to Alaska Native migration range. The Ambler mining communities reached a turning point road would stretch for 211 miles across continued on page 2 n GREAT VICTORY FOR NATIONAL PARKS INSIDE: n PRESERVING HISPANIC-AMERICAN HISTORY n TRUSTEE SPOTLIGHT ©deposit NPS Matt photos Cameron Caribou cross the Kobuk River at Kobuk Valley National Park twice each year — north every spring and south every fall.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska's Artic SAFARI OVERVIEW
    CHEESEMANS’ ECOLOGY SAFARIS 555 North Santa Cruz Avenue Los Gatos, CA 95030-4336 USA (800) 527-5330 (408) 741-5330 [email protected] cheesemans.com Alaska’s Artic Polar Bears and Aurora August 30 to September 9, 2021 Polar Bear with Cubs © Hugh Rose SAFARI OVERVIEW Spend your days watching polar bears and Alaska’s other iconic wildlife and your nights photographing the magical aurora borealis. Cross the Arctic Circle and then travel through the picturesque Alaskan landscape of the Brooks Range, decorated in fall colors, to the stark vastness of the Arctic Coastal Plain. Discover an Inupiat island village where polar bears feed on whale carcasses, while they await the formation of the winter sea ice. Absorb the hypnotic, dancing curtains of color across the night sky as you photograph or simply enjoy the ephemeral phenomenon of the aurora borealis. Explore Arctic Alaska by car, boat, and plane with local photographer and naturalist Hugh Rose where you’ll learn wildlife, landscape, and aurora photography techniques and see nature’s beauty at its finest. Cheesemans’ Ecology Safaris Page 1 of 8 Updated: October 2020 HIGHLIGHTS • Photograph polar bears from land and small boat as they swim, play, and forage on whale blubber. • Experience the colorful dance of the aurora borealis and learn how to capture its brilliance. • Learn about the culture of a native Inupiat village and potentially see a bowhead whale harvest. • Search for iconic Alaskan wildlife such as grizzly bear, caribou, muskox, arctic fox, and gray wolf. • Observe birds of prey as they hunt the Arctic tundra and flocks of migratory birds as they head south.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska LNG Environmental Impact Statement
    APPENDIX Z References Appendix Z: References Aagaard, K., C.H. Pease, A.T. Roach, and S.A. Salo. 1989. Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory. Beaufort Sea Mesoscale Circulation Study Final Report. NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL PMEL-90. November 1989. Able, K.W., T.M. Grothues, I.M. Kemp. 2013. Fine-scale distribution of pelagic fishes relative to a large urban pier. Marine Ecology Progress Series 476:185 – 198. ABR, Inc. – Environmental Research and Services (ABR) and BP Exploration (Alaska), Inc. 2013. Rehabilitation Report for Washington Creek (K8A) Trenching Test Site, Interior Alaska. March 2013. Adams, L.G. 2013. Dynamics of the Denali Caribou Herd, Denali National Park, Alaska: Progress Report (October 2011 – September 2012). USGS — Alaska Science Center. Available online at https://irma.nps.gov/Datastore/DownloadFile/481609. Accessed March 2018. AECOM. 2015. 2015 Paleontological Resources Survey Report. Included as Appendix G of Resource Report 6. Report No. USAI-UR-SRZZZ-00-000064-000. Prepared by AECOM for Alaska LNG. Docket No. PF14-21-000; Accession No. 20170418-5046. AECOM. 2016. West Dock Summer 2016 Field Program. Alaska Pipeline Project. Document Number USAG-EC-JRZZZ-00-000003-000. Airports Council International. 2016. Cargo Traffic for the Past 12 Months, Ending December 2015. Updated April 11, 2016. Available online at http://www.aci.aero/Data-Centre/Monthly-Traffic- Data/Freight-Summary/12-months. Accessed January 2018. Alaska Center for Conservation Science (ACCS). 2016a. BIOTICS Animal Data Portal. University of Alaska, Anchorage. Available online at http://ACCS.uaa.Alaska.edu/. Accessed June 2017. Alaska Center for Conservation Science (ACCS). 2016b. Species Richness. University of Alaska, Anchorage.
    [Show full text]
  • On in the Planning and Construction of the Trans-Alaska Oil Pipeline
    FWS/OBS- 78/70 October 1978 Fish and Wildlife Protect;on in the Planningand Construction of the Trans-AlaskaOil Pipeline by Thomas A. Morehouse, Robert A. Childers, and Linda E. Leask Institute of Social and Economic Research University of Alaska Anchorage, Fairbanks, Juneau Project Officers Performed for Norval Netsch Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1011 E. Tudor Road Washington, D.C. 20240 Anchorage, Alaska 99507 This study was conducted as Sumner A. Dole part of the Federal I nteragency Office of Biological Services Energy-Environment Research Fish and Wildlife Service and Development Program, U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C. 20240 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-010·00470-3 ii Foreword The discovery of huge oil deposits on Alaska's North Slope in 1968 resulted in immediate planning for rapid transport of oil to U.S. markets. Concurrent with consideration of alternative means for moving the oil, including preliminary design of a proposed pipeline, an aroused general public demanded earnest governmental evaluation of the environmental impacts of the project. This growing awareness and concern was reflected in the passage of the 1969 National Environmental Policy Act requiring an Environmental Impact Statement on any proposal for major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. These developments set the stage for subsequent court battles and Congressional actions. Many agencies representing various interests of the Federal Government, the State of Alaska, the private sector, as well as numerous individuals concerned with conservation of fish, wildlife and the environment, expressed frequently differing viewpoints and contributed a variety of recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • O N Y O U R O
    Life PIONEERScience EDITION ON YOUR OWN AnimalsAnimalso ff DenaliDenali By Susan E. Goodman Life EDITION Science PIONEER It’s Time to Explore on Your Own! Good readers use multiple strategies as they read on their own. Use the four key reading comprehension strategies below: PREVIEW AND 1 PREDICT • Look over the text. • Form ideas about how the text is organized and what it says. • Confirm ideas about how the text is organized and what it says. MONITOR AND 2 FIX UP • Think about whether the text is making sense and how it relates to what you know. • Identify comprehension problems and clear up the problems. MAKE 3 INFERENCES • Use what you know to figure out what is not said or shown directly. SUM 4 UP • Pull together the text’s big ideas. Remember that you can choose different strategies at different times to help you understand what you are reading. Animalso ff DenaliDenali PIONEER EDITION By Susan E. Goodman CONTENTS 2 Animals of Denali 8 The Making of a Park 12 Concept Check AnimalsAnimals Denali National Park in Alaska is a harsh land. It’s too cold oo ff for most people. But for many plants and animals, Denali is a paradise. 2 DenaliDenali A brown bear and her cub Red fox AnimalsAnimalsoo ff Caribou Great By Susan E. Goodman horned owl DenaliDenali 3 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< A grizzly bear walks out of her den. She is slow and clumsy. She has been sleeping all winter long. The bear is not alone. Her cubs follow her. She gave birth to them in her sleep.
    [Show full text]