Turing's Biomathematics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Turing's Biomathematics local blip that changes the balance between missionary load. Take too few sub-beaches and or the larger of the two. The latter choice — in Appendix: Turing's missionaries and cannibals, it doesn’t get you can’t have a pattern; take too many and the this case going from a (1,2) not to a (1,3) but to Biomathematics smoothed out. For if there is a temporary local calculations become overwhelming to a human. a (2,3) — preserves the property that the pairs excess of missionaries, the short term will see So Turing compromised on 20 sub-beaches, of numbers involved will always be Fibonacci relatively more missionaries than cannibals multiplying his computing load by 20, and thus numbers, for then the next pair will be (3,5) and arrive from the rest of the island, so even more produced a Figure in which a random starter then (5,8) and so on. Turing called this the ‘H of Nobody who heard Turing talk about his theory conversion than normal occurs. This instability pattern evolves to a series of three stripes. This GP’: the Hypothesis of Geometrical Phyllotaxis — and he spoke to mathematicians, chemists, becomes magnified, stopping only later when the is one of four separate runs he reports under and it is this hypothesis he was using the Ferranti physiologists, zoologists and botanists — had cannibals belatedly turn up for the feast. This different conditions, and, he says, ‘some’ of these Mark I to test. He was right: the ‘H of GP’ does much idea of what his mathematics was. It effect relies on a balance of speed and time, so it results were with the aid of the computer. Given a hold for a wide family of mathematical models contained an idea of genius, simple enough to has a characteristic distance: for each local peak first chance on the Ferranti Mark I at the beginning of spot formation in growing tissue. But Turing explain to an applied mathematician in a few lines of missionaries there will be a trough a particular of September and the submission of his paper never managed to prove it in his lifetime and today. 343 But Turing never gave a lay account of distance away, which in turn induces a further on the 9th of November, he must have worked the mathematicians and physicists — not his mathematics, sWo here is mine. 344 peak so on all the way around the island. remarkably fast and accurately in programming botanists — who carried out that proof many When the report to the Academy is due, the the machine. 347 decades later did so in ignorance of Turing’s work. graph is no longer flat. The cannibals have Giving the arranged themselves into civilised groups. In a Year or Two: The framing of the ‘H of GP’ must have been the missionaries bicycles reason why Turing was confident in 1951 that he Returning from these Western fantasies to Turing's Fibonacci could get himself a good theory in ‘a year or two. 348 Imagine a tropical island, with an impenetrable Turing’s actual paper, he showed that, starting strategy mountainous interior and a lush ring of habitable from a blank canvas, he could generate a sea-fringed forest. This paradise is at first characteristic length-scale. Given that, spots The second remarkable attack Turing made on inhabited by a group of noble savages, whose and stripes and all things math-biological can developmental biology was to develop a theory of specific lack of civilisation is that they are emerge. Turing simply presents this as a model the appearance of Fibonacci structure. Turing had competent hunter-gatherers but occasional with no discussion of why it has been chosen over created a mechanism for making spots appear, cannibals. Despite the occasional feast, for the rivals. I have long puzzled about how Turing came and the spots were separated by a typical most part the population is constrained by the to discover the Turing Instability. He acknowledged length-scale, which depended on a complicated amount of food they can sustainably extract from Waddington’s idea of ‘evocators’ as an example of but tractable way on the numbers put into the their habitat. They move around, and when they his own morphogens, a word Turing invented for model. The number of spots one might see ‘happen to pass by’ each other enough births unnamed biochemicals that could react and developing in a narrow ring of tissue, as he used happen to balance the inevitable deaths. Because diffuse across his canvas, but did he deliberately in his 1952 paper, would depend not only on that the supply of plant food is evenly spread, so is the construct a system of equations for them that length-scale but the circumference of the ring. But population: even if a particularly big feast on one would have the right property or did he discover Figure 122. Turing’s ‘tree’ classifying possible now suppose the ring is no longer narrow, so that shifts between patterns side of the island requires a few extra sacrifices or it when analysing what he thought a plausible patterns can develop across as well along it, in a encourages the survivors to seize the moment model? The technology for this analysis is, in the way where the placement of new spots depends and pass by each other a little more, emigration jargon of applied mathematics, a linearization on where the older ones went. What Turing saw and birth and malnutrition eventually smooth out into Fourier modes, which had been around for was that this dynamic model could allow the the temporary local blip. Then the missionaries decades and well known to any mathematician. pattern to get more and more complicated as the arrive. A sub-mission of theirs is to do Science Turing was familiar from electronics with the inter-spot distance got smaller. What emerges is a and they plot the population density around the possibility that instability could be encoded in a lattice of points, gently stretched as the geometry 346 island. This shows an uninteresting flat graph; system, as was FC Williams. And in Turing’s of the underlying biological ring where spot- the savages are unable to organise themselves. role as an applications consultant he might have formation is happening changes. Lattices are A constant small re-supply of missionaries keeps had to think about how to design crystallographic regular objects, amenable to mathematics, and in arriving, but with guns, germs and steel they also algorithms in Fourier space. this case they can be usefully described by pairs convert a fraction of the population. Since it is a of integers; simple lattices at the beginning of condition of being a missionary to be celibate, the The majority of the mathematics in Turing’s paper development have small pairs like (0,1) and (1,1) population falls a little. But the underlying food is concerned with what happens on the thin outer and (1,2); more complicated lattices, evolving supply is uniform, and so wherever you go you ring of the island, keeping track of the number of from these as the lattices stretched to fit the new find the same number of cannibals and a few missionaries per mile as we go around the beach. geometry of the growing plan, might be described missionaries, in what the scientific reports back Some calculations, such as working out how fast as (1,3), or (2,3). And this is where Turing quickly Figure 123. Classifications of leaf-placement on to the sponsoring Academy call a uniform the bicycles need to go to generate instability, can isolated a problem to prove. Independently of the plant stems from Bonnet’s eighteenth century text distribution. be calculated by hand, perhaps with a few turns model assumptions, it turns out to be an on plant growth. In the fourth example, the leaves on a mechanical calculator: he had a Brunsviga unavoidable feature of geometry that a (1,2) are arranged in a spiral and if the bottom leaf is Now we can see Turing’s stroke of genius: he machine at home to do just this. But others are pattern can only evolve to either a (1,3) or a (2,3): labelled as leaf 0 and numbering is continued gave the missionaries bicycles. 345 Because the more complicated. To cope with this, the beach more generally that if there are two numbers, then upwards, then leaf 0 is closest to leaves 1 and 2: missionaries can move around more quickly, can to be broken up into little sub-beaches, each the sum of the two will appear in the more this is why pattern this can be described as a something new happens. Now, when there is a of which is approximately constant in its complicated lattice paired with either the smaller (1,2) spiral. 172 173 Almost all of the archivists I have needed help Lyn Lloyd Irvine retained her maiden name in her Acknowledgements from have provided it with grace. But I am Notes writing, but called herself Mrs Newman throughout particularly grateful to those who have taken the her life as a married woman. (Mr) Pat Blackett was trouble to find out about my enquiry and to offer perhaps referred to on occasion as Professor extra suggestions: these include Fiona Colbert, The standard, and best, biography of Alan Turing Patrick Maynard Stuart Blackett, Baron We like to identify with our heroes. My own first Elizabeth Ennion-Smith, Patricia McGuire, Kathryn is still Andrew Hodges’ extraordinary Blackett OM CH PRS.
Recommended publications
  • A History of the Society of British Neurological Surgeons 1926 to Circa 1990
    A History of the Society of British Neurological Surgeons 1926 to circa 1990 TT King TT King A History of the Society of British Neurological Surgeons, 1926 to circa 1990 TT King Society Archivist 1 A History of the Society of British Neurological Surgeons, 1926 to circa 1990 © 2017 The Society of British Neurological Surgeons First edition printed in 2017 in the United Kingdom. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval sys- tem or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permis- sion of The Society of British Neurological Surgeons. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the infor- mation contained in this publication, no guarantee can be given that all errors and omissions have been excluded. No responsibility for loss oc- casioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of the material in this publication can be accepted by The Society of British Neurological Surgeons or the author. Published by The Society of British Neurological Surgeons 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields London WC2A 3PE www.sbns.org.uk Printed in the United Kingdom by Latimer Trend EDIT, DESIGN AND TYPESET Polymath Publishing www.polymathpubs.co.uk 2 The author wishes to express his gratitude to Philip van Hille and Matthew Whitaker of Polymath Publishing for bringing this to publication and to the British Orthopaedic Association for their help. 3 A History of the Society of British Neurological Surgeons 4 Contents Foreword
    [Show full text]
  • APA Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers, Vol. 18, No. 2 (Spring
    NEWSLETTER | The American Philosophical Association Philosophy and Computers SPRING 2019 VOLUME 18 | NUMBER 2 FEATURED ARTICLE Jack Copeland and Diane Proudfoot Turing’s Mystery Machine ARTICLES Igor Aleksander Systems with “Subjective Feelings”: The Logic of Conscious Machines Magnus Johnsson Conscious Machine Perception Stefan Lorenz Sorgner Transhumanism: The Best Minds of Our Generation Are Needed for Shaping Our Future PHILOSOPHICAL CARTOON Riccardo Manzotti What and Where Are Colors? COMMITTEE NOTES Marcello Guarini Note from the Chair Peter Boltuc Note from the Editor Adam Briggle, Sky Croeser, Shannon Vallor, D. E. Wittkower A New Direction in Supporting Scholarship on Philosophy and Computers: The Journal of Sociotechnical Critique CALL FOR PAPERS VOLUME 18 | NUMBER 2 SPRING 2019 © 2019 BY THE AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL ASSOCIATION ISSN 2155-9708 APA NEWSLETTER ON Philosophy and Computers PETER BOLTUC, EDITOR VOLUME 18 | NUMBER 2 | SPRING 2019 Polanyi’s? A machine that—although “quite a simple” one— FEATURED ARTICLE thwarted attempts to analyze it? Turing’s Mystery Machine A “SIMPLE MACHINE” Turing again mentioned a simple machine with an Jack Copeland and Diane Proudfoot undiscoverable program in his 1950 article “Computing UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY, CHRISTCHURCH, NZ Machinery and Intelligence” (published in Mind). He was arguing against the proposition that “given a discrete- state machine it should certainly be possible to discover ABSTRACT by observation sufficient about it to predict its future This is a detective story. The starting-point is a philosophical behaviour, and this within a reasonable time, say a thousand discussion in 1949, where Alan Turing mentioned a machine years.”3 This “does not seem to be the case,” he said, and whose program, he said, would in practice be “impossible he went on to describe a counterexample: to find.” Turing used his unbreakable machine example to defeat an argument against the possibility of artificial I have set up on the Manchester computer a small intelligence.
    [Show full text]
  • Births, Marriages, and Deaths
    DEC. 31, 1955 MEDICAL NEWS MEDICALBRrsIJOURNAL. 1631 Lead Glazes.-For some years now the pottery industry British Journal of Ophthalmology.-The new issue (Vol. 19, has been forbidden to use any but leadless or "low- No. 12) is now available. The contents include: solubility" glazes, because of the risk of lead poisoning. EXPERIENCE IN CLINIcAL EXAMINATION OP CORNEAL SENsITiVrry. CORNEAL SENSITIVITY AND THE NASO-LACRIMAL REFLEX AFTER RETROBULBAR However, in some teaching establishments raw lead glazes or ANAES rHESIA. Jorn Boberg-Ans. glazes containing a high percentage of soluble lead are still UVEITIS. A CLINICAL AND STATISTICAL SURVEY. George Bennett. INVESTIGATION OF THE CARBONIC ANHYDRASE CONTENT OF THE CORNEA OF used. The Ministry of Education has now issued a memo- THE RABBIT. J. Gloster. randum to local education authorities and school governors HYALURONIDASE IN OCULAR TISSUES. I. SENSITIVE BIOLOGICAL ASSAY FOR SMALL CONCENTRATIONS OF HYALURONIDASE. CT. Mayer. (No. 517, dated November 9, 1955) with the object of INCLUSION BODIES IN TRACHOMA. A. J. Dark. restricting the use of raw lead glazes in such schools. The TETRACYCLINE IN TRACHOMA. L. P. Agarwal and S. R. K. Malik. APPL IANCES: SIMPLE PUPILLOMETER. A. Arnaud Reid. memorandum also includes a list of precautions to be ob- LARGE CONCAVE MIRROR FOR INDIRECT OPHTHALMOSCOPY. H. Neame. served when handling potentially dangerous glazes. Issued monthly; annual subscription £4 4s.; single copy Awards for Research on Ageing.-Candidates wishing to 8s. 6d.; obtainable from the Publishing Manager, B.M.A. House, enter for the 1955-6 Ciba Foundation Awards for research Tavistock Square, London, W.C.1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Turing Guide
    The Turing Guide Edited by Jack Copeland, Jonathan Bowen, Mark Sprevak, and Robin Wilson • A complete guide to one of the greatest scientists of the 20th century • Covers aspects of Turing’s life and the wide range of his intellectual activities • Aimed at a wide readership • This carefully edited resource written by a star-studded list of contributors • Around 100 illustrations This carefully edited resource brings together contributions from some of the world’s leading experts on Alan Turing to create a comprehensive guide that will serve as a useful resource for researchers in the area as well as the increasingly interested general reader. “The Turing Guide is just as its title suggests, a remarkably broad-ranging compendium of Alan Turing’s lifetime contributions. Credible and comprehensive, it is a rewarding exploration of a man, who in his life was appropriately revered and unfairly reviled.” - Vint Cerf, American Internet pioneer JANUARY 2017 | 544 PAGES PAPERBACK | 978-0-19-874783-3 “The Turing Guide provides a superb collection of articles £19.99 | $29.95 written from numerous different perspectives, of the life, HARDBACK | 978-0-19-874782-6 times, profound ideas, and enormous heritage of Alan £75.00 | $115.00 Turing and those around him. We find, here, numerous accounts, both personal and historical, of this great and eccentric man, whose life was both tragic and triumphantly influential.” - Sir Roger Penrose, University of Oxford Ordering Details ONLINE www.oup.com/academic/mathematics BY TELEPHONE +44 (0) 1536 452640 POSTAGE & DELIVERY For more information about postage charges and delivery times visit www.oup.com/academic/help/shipping/.
    [Show full text]
  • Alan M. Turing – Simplification in Intelligent Computing Theory and Algorithms”
    “Alan Turing Centenary Year - India Celebrations” 3-Day Faculty Development Program on “Alan M. Turing – Simplification in Intelligent Computing Theory and Algorithms” Organized by Foundation for Advancement of Education and Research In association with Computer Society of India - Division II [Software] NASSCOM, IFIP TC - 1 & TC -2, ACM India Council Co-sponsored by P.E.S Institute of Technology Venue PES Institute of Technology, Hoskerehalli, Bangalore Date : 18 - 20 December 2012 Compiled by : Prof. K. Rajanikanth Trustee, FAER “Alan Turing Centenary Year - India Celebrations” 3-Day Faculty Development Program on “Alan M. Turing – Simplification in Intelligent Computing Theory and Algorithms” Organized by Foundation for Advancement of Education and Research In association with Computer Society of India - Division II [Software], NASSCOM, IFIP TC - 1 & TC -2, ACM India Council Co-sponsored by P.E.S Institute of Technology December 18 – 20, 2012 Compiled by : Prof. K. Rajanikanth Trustee, FAER Foundation for Advancement of Education and Research G5, Swiss Complex, 33, Race Course Road, Bangalore - 560001 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.faer.ac.in PREFACE Alan Mathison Turing was born on June 23rd 1912 in Paddington, London. Alan Turing was a brilliant original thinker. He made original and lasting contributions to several fields, from theoretical computer science to artificial intelligence, cryptography, biology, philosophy etc. He is generally considered as the father of theoretical computer science and artificial intelligence. His brilliant career came to a tragic and untimely end in June 1954. In 1945 Turing was awarded the O.B.E. for his vital contribution to the war effort. In 1951 Turing was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Difference, Identification, Evolution
    DIFFERENCE, IDENTIFICATION, EVOLUTION: POSTHUMANISM AS PARADIGMATIC SHIFT IN CONTEMPORARY SPECULATIVE FICTION BY BETHANY DOANE A THESIS IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN HUMANITIES DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH TOWSON UNIVERSITY TOWSON, MARYLAND 21252 MAY, 2013 ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not have been possible without the support and encouragement of Dr. Jennifer Ballengee, who served not only as a committee chair, but also as a mentor, editor, and friend during the research and composition of this project. I would also like to thank Dr. George Hahn, Dr. Erin Fehskens, and Dr. Peter Baker, who also provided guidance and advice throughout the writing process. Lastly, I would like to give special thanks to my husband, Jeff, (who was not yet my husband when this project started) for putting up with me and my many neurotic research and writing habits. Thank you all so much. ii ABSTRACT Difference, Identification, Evolution: Posthumanism as Paradigmatic Shift in Contemporary Speculative Fiction Bethany Doane This study is an initial attempt to investigate the ways that posthumanism manifests within three works of contemporary speculative fiction: Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake (2010), Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go (2005) and Richard Powers’s Galatea 2.2 (1995). Posthumanism seeks to overturn the assumptions of liberal humanism, which places “the human” as the central, most important, and possibly only ethical subject in order to recognize inhuman beings—whether they be animal, clone, or artificial intelligence—as legitimate ethical subjects. At the same time, it recognizes that human beings and technology are intimately bound together.
    [Show full text]
  • Semantics and Syntax a Legacy of Alan Turing Scientific Report
    Semantics and Syntax A Legacy of Alan Turing Scientific Report Arnold Beckmann (Swansea) S. Barry Cooper (Leeds) Benedikt L¨owe (Amsterdam) Elvira Mayordomo (Zaragoza) Nigel P. Smart (Bristol) 1 Basic theme and background information Why was the programme organised on this particular topic? The programme Semantics and Syn- tax was one of the central activities of the Alan Turing Year 2012 (ATY). The ATY was the world-wide celebration of the life and work of the exceptional scientist Alan Mathison Turing (1912{1954) with a particu- lar focus on the places where Turing has worked during his life: Cambridge, Bletchley Park, and Manchester. The research programme Semantics and Syntax took place during the first six months of the ATY in Cam- bridge, included Turing's 100th birthday on 23 June 1912 at King's College, and combined the character of an intensive high-level research semester with outgoing activities as part of the centenary celebrations. The programme had xx visiting fellows, xx programme participants, and xx workshop participants, many of which were leaders of their respective fields. Alan Turing's work was too broad for a coherent research programme, and so we focused on only some of the areas influenced by this remarkable scientists: logic, complexity theory and cryptography. This selection was motivated by a common phenomenon of a divide in these fields between aspects coming from logical considerations (called Syntax in the title of the programme) and those coming from structural, mathematical or algorithmic considerations (called Semantics in the title of the programme). As argued in the original proposal, these instances of the syntax-semantics divide are a major obstacle for progress in our fields, and the programme aimed at bridging this divide.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Did What? Engineers Vs Mathematicians Title Page America Vs Europe Ideas Vs Implementations Babbage Lovelace Turing
    Who did what? Engineers vs Mathematicians Title Page America vs Europe Ideas vs Implementations Babbage Lovelace Turing Flowers Atanasoff Berry Zuse Chandler Broadhurst Mauchley & Von Neumann Wilkes Eckert Williams Kilburn SlideSlide 1 1 SlideSlide 2 2 A decade of real progress What remained to be done? A number of different pioneers had during the 1930s and 40s Memory! begun to make significant progress in developing automatic calculators (computers). Thanks (almost entirely) to A.M. Turing there was a complete theoretical understanding of the elements necessary to produce a Atanasoff had pioneered the use of electronics in calculation stored program computer – or Universal Turing Machine. Zuse had mad a number of theoretical breakthroughs Not for the first time, ideas had outstripped technology. Eckert and Mauchley (with JvN) had produced ENIAC and No-one had, by the end of the war, developed a practical store or produced the EDVAC report – spreading the word memory. Newman and Flowers had developed the Colossus It should be noted that not too many people were even working on the problem. SlideSlide 3 3 SlideSlide 4 4 The players Controversy USA: Eckert, Mauchley & von Neumann – EDVAC Fall out over the EDVAC report UK: Maurice Wilkes – EDSAC Takeover of the SSEM project by Williams (Kilburn) UK: Newman – SSEM (what was the role of Colossus?) Discord on the ACE project and the departure of Turing UK: Turing - ACE EDSAC alone was harmonious We will concentrate for a little while on the SSEM – the winner! SlideSlide 5 5 SlideSlide 6 6 1 Newman & technology transfer: Secret Technology Transfer? the claim Donald Michie : Cryptanalyst An enormous amount was transferred in an extremely seminal way to the post war developments of computers in Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • An International Journal of English Studies 25/1 2016 EDITOR Prof
    ANGLICA An International Journal of English Studies 25/1 2016 EDITOR prof. dr hab. Grażyna Bystydzieńska [[email protected]] ASSOCIATE EDITORS dr hab. Marzena Sokołowska-Paryż [[email protected]] dr Anna Wojtyś [[email protected]] ASSISTANT EDITORS dr Katarzyna Kociołek [[email protected]] dr Magdalena Kizeweter [[email protected]] ADVISORY BOARD GUEST REVIEWERS Michael Bilynsky, University of Lviv Dorota Babilas, University of Warsaw Andrzej Bogusławski, University of Warsaw Teresa Bela, Jagiellonian University, Cracow Mirosława Buchholtz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń Maria Błaszkiewicz, University of Warsaw Xavier Dekeyser University of Antwerp / KU Leuven Anna Branach-Kallas, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń Bernhard Diensberg, University of Bonn Teresa Bruś, University of Wrocław, Poland Edwin Duncan, Towson University, Towson, MD Francesca de Lucia, independent scholar Jacek Fabiszak, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań Ilona Dobosiewicz, Opole University Jacek Fisiak, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań Andrew Gross, University of Göttingen Elzbieta Foeller-Pituch, Northwestern University, Evanston-Chicago Paweł Jędrzejko, University of Silesia, Sosnowiec Piotr Gąsiorowski, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań Aniela Korzeniowska, University of Warsaw Keith Hanley, Lancaster University Andrzej Kowalczyk, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin Christopher Knight, University of Montana, Missoula, MT Barbara Kowalik, University of Warsaw Marcin Krygier, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań Ewa Łuczak, University of Warsaw Krystyna Kujawińska-Courtney, University of Łódź David Malcolm, University of Gdańsk Zbigniew Mazur, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin Dominika Oramus University of Warsaw Znak ogólnodostępnyRafał / Molencki,wersje University językowe of Silesia, Sosnowiec Marek Paryż, University of Warsaw John G. Newman, University of Texas at Brownsville Anna Pochmara, University of Warsaw Michal Jan Rozbicki, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Machines Think? the Controversy That Led to the Turing Test, 1946-1950
    Can machines think? The controversy that led to the Turing test, 1946-1950 Bernardo Gonçalves1 Abstract Turing’s much debated test has turned 70 and is still fairly controversial. His 1950 paper is seen as a complex and multi-layered text and key questions remain largely unanswered. Why did Turing choose learning from experience as best approach to achieve machine intelligence? Why did he spend several years working with chess-playing as a task to illustrate and test for machine intelligence only to trade it off for conversational question-answering later in 1950? Why did Turing refer to gender imitation in a test for machine intelligence? In this article I shall address these questions directly by unveiling social, historical and epistemological roots of the so-called Turing test. I will draw attention to a historical fact that has been scarcely observed in the secondary literature so far, namely, that Turing's 1950 test came out of a controversy over the cognitive capabilities of digital computers, most notably with physicist and computer pioneer Douglas Hartree, chemist and philosopher Michael Polanyi, and neurosurgeon Geoffrey Jefferson. Seen from its historical context, Turing’s 1950 paper can be understood as essentially a reply to a series of challenges posed to him by these thinkers against his view that machines can think. Keywords: Alan Turing, Can machines think?, The imitation game, The Turing test, Mind-machine controversy, History of artificial intelligence. Robin Gandy (1919-1995) was one of Turing’s best friends and his only doctorate student. He received Turing’s mathematical books and papers when Turing died in 1954, and took over from Max Newman in 1963 the task of editing the papers for publication.1 Regarding Turing’s purpose in writing his 1950 paper and sending it for publication, Gandy offered a testimony previously brought forth by Jack Copeland which has not yet been commented about:2 It was intended not so much as a penetrating contribution to philosophy but as propaganda.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Construction and the British Computer Industry in the Post-World War II Period
    The rhetoric of Americanisation: Social construction and the British computer industry in the Post-World War II period By Robert James Kirkwood Reid Submitted to the University of Glasgow for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Economic History Department of Economic and Social History September 2007 1 Abstract This research seeks to understand the process of technological development in the UK and the specific role of a ‘rhetoric of Americanisation’ in that process. The concept of a ‘rhetoric of Americanisation’ will be developed throughout the thesis through a study into the computer industry in the UK in the post-war period . Specifically, the thesis discusses the threat of America, or how actors in the network of innovation within the British computer industry perceived it as a threat and the effect that this perception had on actors operating in the networks of construction in the British computer industry. However, the reaction to this threat was not a simple one. Rather this story is marked by sectional interests and technopolitical machination attempting to capture this rhetoric of ‘threat’ and ‘falling behind’. In this thesis the concept of ‘threat’ and ‘falling behind’, or more simply the ‘rhetoric of Americanisation’, will be explored in detail and the effect this had on the development of the British computer industry. What form did the process of capture and modification by sectional interests within government and industry take and what impact did this have on the British computer industry? In answering these questions, the thesis will first develop a concept of a British culture of computing which acts as the surface of emergence for various ideologies of innovation within the social networks that made up the computer industry in the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Alan M. Turing 23.Juni 1912 – 7.Juni 1954
    Alan M. Turing 23.juni 1912 – 7.juni 1954 Denne lista inneholder oversikt over bøker og DVD-er relatert til Alan M.Turings liv og virke. De fleste dokumentene er til utlån i Informa- tikkbiblioteket. Biblioteket har mange bøker om Turingmaskiner og be- regnbarhet, sjekk hylla på F.0 og F.1.*. Litteratur om Kryptografi finner du på E.3.0 og om Kunstig intelligens på I.2.0. Du kan også bruke de uthevete ordene som søkeord i BIBSYS: http://app.uio.no/ub/emnesok/?id=ureal URL-ene i lista kan brukes for å sjekke dokumentets utlånsstatus i BIBSYS eller bestille og reservere. Du må ha en pdf-leser som takler lenker. Den kryptiske opplysningen i parentes på linja før URL viser plas- sering på hylla i Informatikkbiblioteket (eller bestillingsstatus). Normalt vil bøkene i denne lista være plassert på noen hyller nær utstillingsmon- teren, så lenge Turing-utstillingen er oppstilt. Bøkene kan lånes derfra på normalt vis. [1] Jon Agar. Turing and the universal machine: the making of the modern computer. Icon, Cambridge, 2001. (K.2.0 AGA) http://ask.bibsys.no/ask/action/show?pid=010911804&kid=biblio. [2] H. Peter Alesso and C.F. Smith. Thinking on the Web: Berners-Lee, Gödel, and Turing. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, N.J., 2006. (I.2.4 Ale) http://ask.bibsys.no/ask/action/show?pid=08079954x&kid=biblio. [3] Michael Apter. Enigma. Basert på: Enigma av Robert Harris. Teks- tet på norsk, svensk, dansk, finsk, engelsk. In this twisty thriller about Britain’s secret code breakers during World War II, Tom Je- richo devised the means to break the Nazi Enigma code (DVD) http://ask.bibsys.no/ask/action/show?pid=082617570&kid=biblio.
    [Show full text]