DOCSLIB.ORG

Review of Maritime Transport 2017 United Nations Conference on Trade and Development

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Review of Maritime Transport 2017 United Nations Conference on Trade and Development UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW OF MARITIME TRANSPORT 2017 UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW OF MARITIME TRANSPORT 2017 New York and Geneva, 2017 ii NOTE NOTE The Review of Maritime Transport is a recurrent publication prepared by the UNCTAD secretariat since 1968 with the aim of fostering the transparency of maritime markets and analysing relevant developments. Any factual or editorial corrections that may prove necessary, based on comments made by Governments, will be reflected in a corrigendum to be issued subsequently. * ** Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Use of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. * ** The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. * ** Material in this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted, but acknowledgement is requested, with reference to the document symbol (UNCTAD/RMT/2017). A copy of the publication containing the quotation or reprint should be sent to the UNCTAD secretariat at the following address: Palais des Nations, 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland. UNCTAD/RMT/2017 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. E.17.II.D.10 ISBN 978-92-1-112922-9 eISBN 978-92-1-362808-9 ISSN 0566-7682 REVIEW OF MARITIME TRANSPORT 2017 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Preparation of the Review of Maritime Transport 2017 was coordinated by Jan Hoffmann under the overall guidance of Shamika N. Sirimanne. Administrative support and formatting were provided by Wendy Juan. Contributors were Regina Asariotis, Mark Assaf, Hassiba Benamara, Marco Fugazza, Jan Hoffmann, Anila Premti, Luisa Rodríguez, Pamela Ugaz, Mathis Weller and Frida Youssef. The publication was edited by Deniz Barki and Lucy Délèze-Black. The cover and infographics were designed by Nadège Hadjemian and Magali Studer. Desktop publishing was carried out by Stéphane Bothua and Nathalie Loriot. The comments and input provided by the following reviewers are gratefully acknowledged: Cecile Barayre, Gail Bradford, Alex Charvalias, Virginia Cram-Martos, Trevor Crowe, Michael Dooms, Mahin Faghfouri, Hans J. Gätjens, Ansgar Kauf, Nicholas-Joseph Lazarou, Steven Malby, James Milne, Dimitris Mitrodimas, Gerald Paul Ollivier, Karin Orsel, Kieran Ring, Ben Shepherd, Antonella Teodoro, Miluše Tichavska, Caitlin Vaughan, Frans Waals and Gordon Wilmsmeier. Thanks are also due to Vladislav Shuvalov for reviewing the publication in full. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Note ...................................................................................................................................................................................................ii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................................................iii Abbreviations ....................................................................................................................................................................................vii Explanatory notes............................................................................................................................................................................. viii Executive summary .............................................................................................................................................................................x 1. DEVELOPMENTS IN INTERNATIONAL SEABORNE TRADE .......................................................1 A. World economic situation .............................................................................................................................................3 B. World seaborne trade ..................................................................................................................................................5 C. Outlook and policy considerations ..............................................................................................................................14 2. STRUCTURE, OWNERSHIP AND REGISTRATION OF THE WORLD FLEET .................................21 A. World fleet structure ..................................................................................................................................................23 B. World fleet ownership and operation ...........................................................................................................................28 C. Ship registration ........................................................................................................................................................32 D. Shipbuilding, demolition and new orders .....................................................................................................................34 E. Future trends in maritime transport supply and relevant requirements ...........................................................................35 F. Outlook and policy considerations ...............................................................................................................................40 3. FREIGHT RATES AND MARITIME TRANSPORT COSTS ..........................................................43 A. Container freight rates ...............................................................................................................................................45 B. Dry bulk freight rates .................................................................................................................................................50 C. Tanker freight rates ...................................................................................................................................................52 D. International transport costs .......................................................................................................................................55 E. Outlook and policy considerations ...............................................................................................................................56 4. PORTS ...............................................................................................................................61 A. World container port developments .............................................................................................................................63 B. World container ports and liner shipping market developments .....................................................................................67 C. Private sector participation in ports .............................................................................................................................73 D. Outlook and policy considerations ..............................................................................................................................78 5. LEGAL ISSUES AND REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS .............................................................83 A. Technological challenges and opportunities in the global shipping industry ....................................................................85 B. Regulatory developments relating to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping, and other environmental issues ..................................................................................................................................89 C. Other legal and regulatory developments affecting transportation .................................................................................91 D. Policy considerations .................................................................................................................................................92 6. MARITIME TRANSPORT CONNECTIVITY ...............................................................................99 A. Container ship deployment and liner shipping connectivity ........................................................................................101 B. Maritime cabotage: Intracountry connectivity and global shipping networks .................................................................106 C. Trade and maritime transport facilitation ...................................................................................................................109 D. Outlook and policy considerations .............................................................................................................................111 REVIEW OF MARITIME TRANSPORT 2017 v Tables 1.1. World economic growth, 2015–2017 .............................................................................................................................4 1.2. Growth in volume of merchandise trade, 2013–2016 ....................................................................................................4 1.3. Growth in international seaborne trade, selected years ...................................................................................................5 1.4. World seaborne trade by economic grouping, region and type of cargo, 2015 and 2016 ..................................................7 1.5. Major producers and consumers of oil and natural gas, 2016 .........................................................................................9
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Year of Green Retrofits
    Customer Magazine ISSUE 4 (35) 2020 The year of green retrofits A tribute to the X-PRESS FEEDERS Russian American hero container ships… arctic icebreaker The ship commemorating …for the first time We brought azimuth thruster Major Richard Winters at our premises! back to full operation in magazine Page 5 Page 16 Page 24 editorial contents Customer Magazine ISSUE 4 (35) 2020 The year The third wave of green retrofits A tribute to the X-PRESS FEEDERS Russian American hero container ships… arctic icebreaker The ship commemorating …for the first time We brought azimuth thruster Major Richard Winters at our premises! back to full operation magazine of uncertainty in Page 5 Page 16 Page 24 The year 2020 will certainly go agement during the COVID-19 3 Mont St Michel began down in history as the most difficult pandemic that was crucial in the ferry repair season at in track record of the global econ- operations of all shipyards world- Remontowa omy. Once COVID-19 vaccines wide. Remontowa has managed had appeared and began to be dis- this very well. The procedures put 5 The ship commemorating tributed, there was hope for a pro- in place at a very early stage to pre- Major Richard Winters gressive return to normality. How- vent coronavirus infection, backed 7 LPG carriers arrived for ever, there is still uncertainty as to up by good cooperation with Ship- special surveys and BWMS whether the third wave of the pan- owners, resulted in safe project ex- installations demic will strike and with what ef- ecution. fect.
    [Show full text]
  • Cold Ironing Report
    PRELIMINARY DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE I. INTRODUCTION This report presents an analysis of the feasibility and cost effectiveness of cold-ironing ocean-going vessels while docked at California ports. Cold-ironing refers to shutting down auxiliary engines on ships while in port and connecting to electrical power supplied at the dock, thus eliminating virtually all emissions from a ship while it is in port. (Cold-ironing is also referred to as “shore power” and alternative maritime power). The term “cold-ironing” comes from the act of dry-docking a vessel, which involves shutting down all on-board combustion, resulting in the vessel going “cold.” Without cold-ironing, auxiliary engines run continuously while a ship is docked, or “hotelled,” at a berth to power lighting, ventilation, pumps, communication, and other onboard equipment. Ships can hotel for several hours or several days. Hotelling emissions from ship auxiliary engines are significant contributors to particulate matter from diesel-fueled engines (diesel PM), California’s most significant toxic air contaminant. Diesel PM emissions are estimated to be responsible for about 70 percent of the total ambient air toxics risk in California. Communities adjacent to the ports are exposed to elevated cancer risk and other health impacts from these hotelling emissions. As indicated in a recent Air Resources Board (ARB or Board) risk analysis conducted for the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, “Diesel Particulate Matter Exposure Assessment Study for the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach,” 20 percent of total diesel PM emissions at these ports comes from hotelling emissions. Other sources of diesel PM include emissions from ship transit and maneuvering, cargo-handling equipment, and rail and truck operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Det Norske Veritas
    DET NORSKE VERITAS Report Heavy fuel in the Arctic (Phase 1) PAME-Skrifstofan á Íslandi Report No./DNV Reg No.: 2011-0053/ 12RJ7IW-4 Rev 00, 2011-01-18 DET NORSKE VERITAS Report for PAME-Skrifstofan á Íslandi Heavy fuel in the Arctic (Phase 1) MANAGING RISK Table of Contents SUMMARY............................................................................................................................... 1 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 3 2 PHASE 1 OBJECTIVE..................................................................................................... 3 3 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................ 3 3.1 General ....................................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Arctic waters delimitation .......................................................................................... 3 3.3 Heavy fuel oil definition and fuel descriptions .......................................................... 4 3.4 Application of AIS data.............................................................................................. 5 3.5 Identifying the vessels within the Arctic.................................................................... 6 3.6 Identifying the vessels using HFO as fuel.................................................................. 7 4 TECHNICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF USING HFO
    [Show full text]
  • Hong Kong & China South Korea 2011 Prospects Reefer Trades
    November/December 2010 Heroes all Hong Kong & China n South Korea n 2011 prospects n Reefer trades November/December 2010 CoNteNts AM CoveR stoRy 36 It is a byword of any self-respecting industry that its workforce is its most precious asset. In shipping such a proposition is axiomatic. As demonstrated in our cover story this month, over and above the tough jobs they perform in often difficult conditions, seafarers around the world are often called upon to perform tasks of great daring in order to save the lives of others who find themselves in distress in dangerous seas. We also pay tribute to those seafarers that during this holiday period find themselves not at home with family and friends but held captive by viscous unprincipled pirates with little hope of Heroes all getting home anytime soon. AM FeAtURes 14 Asia Eye Hong Kong confrontation in prospect 16 Hong Kong/China Wake up and see the shipping 24 Reefer trades 14 To box or not 27 South Korea Pulp stories 34 2011 prospects The future through a glass darkly 34 November/December 2010 asiamaritime 1 November/December 2010 AM RegUlAR ColUmNs CoNteNts 4 Comment Buddy can we earn a dime in exports? 6 Briefs Yards, Lines, Ports 9 Commodities Oil for the skin and everything in between 12 News line Seafarer shortage narrows 12 38 Operations Battling cross-ocean infection 40 IMO The year ahead 42 Green page Clean ship recycling initiative 40 43 Logistics Ticking bombs 44 Technical Keep the cargo flowing – cleanly 45 Ship’s store Lovely bubbly 46 Seascapes Careful of the human dimension 43 48 Brief encounters A solution for everything? 49 Launched Ships with a Latin flavour 50 Diary Captain Gregorio Oca in memoriam 52 52 Maritime’s back pages China’s gas breakthrough 2 asiamaritime November/December 2010 Committed to clean seas The maritime transportation industry has benefited from innovative MacGregor products for over 70 years.
    [Show full text]
  • V. Inland Ports Planningand Cargos Handling Opera Tion*
    V. INLAND PORTS PLANNINGAND CARGOS HANDLING OPERA TION* Inland Ports Planning General The term inland waterway port or an inland waterway terminal conveys the idea of an end point. Indeed, traditionally, ports were perceived as end points of the transport system whereby water transport of cargoeswas either originated or terminated. However, from a broader point of view, the one encompassingthe so-called "c~ain of transport", ports or terminals are neither starting nor ending points; they are simply the intermediate points where cargoesare transferred between the links in the transport chain. The emphasis on the transfer function in this introductory section is made since: (a) Ports' main function is to move the cargo and to avoid accumulating and damaging it; (b) In order to efficiently fulfill their transfer function, ports or terminals have to possess convenient access(rail and road) to the connecting modes of transport. broader definition ora port seems especially appropriate for our discussion on inland waterway transportation (IWT). IWT is part of the domestic transportation system which also includes rail and road transpiration. IWT, unlike rail and road transportation, can oQly connectpoints which are locatea on the waterway network. Consequently, in most caSes othercomplementary land transportation modes are required for the entire origin-to-destinationtransport. In other words, since in most casesthe IWT cargo does not originate or terminate atthe port site itself, the main function of the inland port is to transfer the cargo between IWTvessels, trains, and trucks. The inland ports are important for the economic development of a country. The inland port, therail, the road and the seaport are equally important.
    [Show full text]
  • Potomac River Transporation Plan.Indd
    Potomac River Transportation Framework Plan Washington DC, Virginia, Maryland Water transportation is the most economical, energy effi cient and environmentally friendly transportation that exists for major cities today. The vast river network that was the original lifeblood of the Washington, DC region remains underutilized. The Potomac River Transportation Framework Plan is a comprehensive master plan outlining a water based transportation network on the Potomac and Anacostia Rivers in Washington, DC, Maryland and Virginia, for commuters, tourists and the federal government (defense and civilian evacuations). This plan outlines an enormous opportunity to expand the transportation network at a fraction of the cost (both in dollars and environmental impact) of other transportation modes. The plan includes intermodal connections to the existing land based public transportation system. See Detail Plan GEORGETOWN REGIONAL PLAN KENNEDY CENTER RFK STADIUM NATIONAL MALL THE WHARF BASEBALL The plan to the left GEORGETOWN STADIUM NAVY YARD PENTAGON BUZZARD POINT/ SOCCER STADIUM POPLAR POINT illustrates the reach of FORT MCNAIR JBAB the transporation plan KENNEDY CENTER that includes Virginia, NATIONAL AIRPORT RFK STADIUM JBAB / ST. ELIZABETHS SOUTH Maryland, and the DAINGERFIELD ISLAND NATIONAL MALL GENON SITE District of Columbia, CANAL CENTER ROBINSON TERMINAL NORTH fully integrated with THE OLD TOWN- KING STREET existing land based WHARF ROBINSON TERMINAL SOUTH BASEBALL PENTAGON STADIUM NAVY YARD JONES POINT transporation. NATIONAL HARBOR POPLAR POINT BUZZARD POINT/SOCCER STADIUM FORT MCNAIR JBAB A TERMINAL ‘A’ Both Plans illustrate B TERMINAL ‘B’ C TERMINAL ‘C’ potential routes and landings for D TERMINAL ‘D’ MOUNT VERNON FORT WASHINGTON Commuters, Tourists NATIONAL AIRPORT and the Federal JBAB / ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Marinas of Anne Arundel County
    Marina Inventory Of Anne Arundel County 2018 Office of Planning & Zoning Long Range Planning Division Marina Inventory Of Anne Arundel County July 2018 Anne Arundel County Office of Planning and Zoning Long Range Planning Division ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Office of Planning and Zoning Philip R. Hager, Planning and Zoning Officer Lynn Miller, Assistant Planning and Zoning Officer Project Team Long Range Planning Division Cindy Carrier, Planning Administrator Mark Wildonger, Senior Planner Patrick Hughes, Senior Planner Andrea Gerhard, Planner II Special Thanks to VisitAnnapolis.org for the use of the cover photo showing Herrington Harbor. Table of Contents Background Marinas Commercial Marinas Community Marinas Impacts of Marinas Direct Benefit Census Data and Economic Impact Other Waterfront Sites in the County Appendix A – Listing of Marinas in Anne Arundel County, 2018 Appendix B – Location Maps of Marinas in Anne Arundel County, 2018 Office of Planning & Zoning Long Range Planning Division Marinas of Anne Arundel County Background Anne Arundel County has approximately 533 miles of shoreline along the Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries. This resource provides the opportunity for the marine industry to flourish, providing services to the commercial and recreational boaters. In 1980, the first Boating and Marina Study was completed in the County. At that time, the County had 57 marinas and 1,767 boat slips.1 Since that time the County has experienced significant growth in all aspects of its economy including the marine industry. As of June 2018, there are a total of 303 marinas containing at total of 12,035 boat slips (Table 1). This report was prepared as an update to the 1997 and 2010 marina inventories2 and includes an updated inventory and mapping of marinas in the County.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 IFSMA Newsletter 40
    IFSMA Newsletter 40 1 International Federation of Shipmasters’ Associations (IFSMA) 1 Birdcage Walk • London SW1H 9JJ • United Kingdom • Telephone: +44 (0)20 7261 0450 • Editor P. Owen • News Editor P. Ridgway Email:[email protected] • Website:www.ifsma.org • Facebook:www.facebook.com/ifsma• Twitter:@ifsma • LinkedIn:“Secretary General IFSMA” Contents Secretary General’s Report SecretaryGeneral’sReport 2 th FromtheEditor 3 On 5 April our dear friend and vice president, Cal Hunziker was laid to rest at a family funeral. Father TheIMODigest 3 Sinclair Oubre, Apostleship of the Sea of the UN Organisations issue joint call for seafarers and aircrew to be prioritizedforCovid-19vaccination 3 United States, held a very touching Memorial Service for Cal on 20th April at the Texas Maritime IMOShip-PortInterfaceGuide 3 Academy. This has been available recorded on IMOholdsfirstevervirtualawardsceremony 4 GoToMeeting for those unable to attend, with DraftamendmentstotheIMOCouncil 5 restrictions on numbers allowed. Should anyone IMO’sDayoftheSeafarercampaign 6 wish to see the service, please contact HQ and we 2021WorldDayforSafetyandHealthatWork 7 can send you a link. We agreed with Cal’s wife that FullcomplementofBMAdocumentationnowavailable we would not send flowers, but instead we made a electronically 7 donation from all at IFSMA to the Elizabeth and Coronavirus(Covid-19) 8 Calvin Hunziker Endowment which they set up in 2019 to help cadets in their academic costs at the NewOCIMFpublicationTurkishStraitsGuide 9 Texas A&M Maritime Academy. I hope you Europe’sportscallformoreshorepower 10 approve as Cal and Lisa devoted their life to Multiplecruiseshipanchorfailures 11 helping seafarers and potential shipmasters after CanalorCape 11 Cal retired from the sea as an active pilot.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Vessel Requirements for the U.S. Offshore Wind Sector
    Assessment of Vessel Requirements for the U.S. Offshore Wind Sector Prepared for the Department of Energy as subtopic 5.2 of the U.S. Offshore Wind: Removing Market Barriers Grant Opportunity 24th September 2013 Disclaimer This Report is being disseminated by the Department of Energy. As such, the document was prepared in compliance with Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law 106-554) and information quality guidelines issued by the Department of Energy. Though this Report does not constitute “influential” information, as that term is defined in DOE’s information quality guidelines or the Office of Management and Budget's Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review (Bulletin), the study was reviewed both internally and externally prior to publication. For purposes of external review, the study and this final Report benefited from the advice and comments of offshore wind industry stakeholders. A series of project-specific workshops at which study findings were presented for critical review included qualified representatives from private corporations, national laboratories, and universities. Acknowledgements Preparing a report of this scope represented a year-long effort with the assistance of many people from government, the consulting sector, the offshore wind industry and our own consortium members. We would like to thank our friends and colleagues at Navigant and Garrad Hassan for their collaboration and input into our thinking and modeling. We would especially like to thank the team at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) who prepared many of the detailed, technical analyses which underpinned much of our own subsequent modeling.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for the Selection and Operation of Jack-Ups in the Marine Renewable Energy Industry
    www.RenewableUK.com Guidelines for the Selection and Operation of Jack-ups in the Marine Renewable Energy Industry Issue 2: 2013 RUK13-019-02 2 Industry guidance aimed at jack-up owners operators, developers and contractors engaged in site-investigation, construction, operation and maintenance of offshore wind and marine energy installations. Acknowledgements RenewableUK acknowledges the time, effort, experience and expertise of all those who have contributed to this document. This Issue 2 of these guidelines was prepared for RenewableUK by London Offshore Consultants. This was in consultation with key consultees listed at the end of this document, RenewableUK members and key industry stakeholders. Status of this Document RenewableUK Health and Safety Guidelines are intended to provide information on particular technical, legal or policy issues relevant to the core membership base of RenewableUK. Their objective is to provide industry-specific guidance, for example where current information could be considered absent or incomplete. Health and Safety Guidelines are likely to be subject to review and updating, and so the latest version of the guidelines must be referred to. Attention is also drawn to the disclaimer below. Disclaimer The contents of these guidelines are intended for information and general guidance only, and do not constitute advice, are not exhaustive and do not indicate any specific course of action. Detailed professional advice should be obtained before taking or refraining from action in relation to any of the contents of this guide, or the relevance or applicability of the information herein. RenewableUK is not responsible for the content of external websites included in these guidelines and, where applicable, the inclusion of a link to an external website should not be understood to be an endorsement of that website or the site’s owners (or its products/services).
    [Show full text]
  • Cargo Shipping Company Chooses
    OCTOBER 2016 Automation for Morocco and Virginia Emerson reefer deals This month, there have been with up to 2 km of quay, de- tor of APM Terminals MedPort tracks and civil works” Künz said. two significant developments in signed to serve ULCVs up to Tangier. APMT confirmed to World- port automation. APM Termi- 20,000 TEU. The STS cranes will be de- Cargo News that both the STS nals has announced orders for 12 “Our goal is to use proven livered by ZPMC at the end of cranes and ASCs will have crane remote-controlled STS cranes technology to create high pro- 2017, and will feature a second control and automation systems and 32 ASCs for its new Med- ductivity for our clients on one trolley, OCR technology, and from Siemens. It also transpires Port Tangier facility, now under of the world’s most strategically “full automation”, with remote that one of the new ZPMC construction. important trade lanes on the crane operators safely located in cranes at ECT in Rotterdam was The terminal will have an Strait of Gibraltar,” stated Den- an office building near the quay. delivered with a Siemens full re- eventual capacity of 5M TEU, nis Olesen, managing direc- Also due for delivery at the mote control system. end of 2017, the 32 ASCs will be In the US, Konecranes has The Künz ASCs use rounded girders to lower weight and wind/wheel loads built by Austria-based Künz and disclosed that it has received SEATRADE ORANGE making its first call at Antwerp this month will be deployed in 16 container a “Notice of Intent to Award yard blocks – each serviced by Contracts” from the Virginia Emerson Climate Solutions has ried out with chilled banana two ASCs.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Transportation Research and Education Center Tier 1 University Transportation Center U.S. Department of Transportation
    MARITIME TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH AND EDUCATION CENTER TIER 1 UNIVERSITY TRANSPORTATION CENTER U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Transit-Oriented Development and Ports: National Analysis across the United States and a Case Study of New Orleans Project Start Date: October 2013 Project End Date: September 2017 Principal Investigator: John L. Renne, Ph.D., AICP Director and Associate Professor, Center for Urban and Environmental Solutions School of Urban and Regional Planning Florida Atlantic University Building 44, Room 284 777 Glades Road Boca Raton, Florida 33431 561-297-4281 [email protected] Honorary Research Associate Transport Studies Unit, School of Geography and the Environment University of Oxford Final Report Date: November 2017 FINAL RESEARCH REPORT Prepared for: Maritime Transportation Research and Education Center University of Arkansas 4190 Bell Engineering Center Fayetteville, AR 72701 479-575-6021 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. Department of Transportation under Grant Award Number DTRT13-G-UTC50. The work was conducted through the Maritime Transportation Research and Education Center (MarTREC) at the University of Arkansas. In partnership with and as a member of the MarTREC consortium, this project was funded through the University of New Orleans Transportation Institute, where Dr. John L. Renne was employed until the end of 2015. Dr. Renne would like to acknowledge Tara Tolford and Estefania Mayorga for their efforts on the data analysis and assistance with the report. He is grateful to all of the interviewees who donated their time for the benefit of this study. Finally, Dr. Renne wishes to thank James Amdal for his expertise and assistance on this project.
    [Show full text]