Rate of Reaction and Order of the Esterification of Propylene Glycol with Acetic Acid

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Ursinus College Digital Commons @ Ursinus College Chemistry Honors Papers Student Research 5-13-1951 Rate of Reaction and Order of the Esterification of Propylene Glycol With Acetic Acid Thrygve R. Meeker Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.ursinus.edu/chem_hon Part of the Chemistry Commons Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Ursinus College Library, URSINUSIANA COLLECTION Class_^ Box C%An-y RATE OF REACTION and ORDER Of TllH E ESTERIFICATION of PROPYLENE GLYCOL with ACETIC ACID Department of chemistry Thrygve R. Meeker 5/13/51 This paper is submitted to> the faculty of Orsinus College in partial fulfiiinient of requirements for honors in Chemistry. Submitted: May 17, 1951 TABLE OF GONTEMTS Theory 1 Technique of determinations .... 5 Procedure 7 Experimental data 8 Calculations 9 Corrections for c 10 Check on acetic acid loss 12 Curve analysis 13 Results 14 Summary , 14 Graphs 1$ DETERMINATION of ORDER and bPECIEIC REACTION RATE of ESTERIFICATION OF PROPY.1.ENE GLYCOL with ACETIC ACID at 40° Centigrade The order of a chemical reaction is a term which designates the number of moles which are involved in a given reaction. Thus the decomposition of calcium carbonate by heating is a first order reaction and the precipitation of silver chloride from silver nitrate with sodium chloride is a second order reaction. *Let us first investigate the kinetics of a hypothetical first order reaction A B ^^^^ > A -1- B. By the definition of -order given above this reaction is of the first order. From experimental data on reactions known to be of ihis type, the following relationship has made itself evident: the rate of change of the reactant is negatively proportional'-to theloonc- centration at any time. In other v/oras if we plot the rate of change of AB against time, a curve of this general form w;ould result: Ac_ ALir *Theory of reaction kinetics taken from Elements of Physical ohemistry, S. Glasstone, XMOstrand Co. New/ York -2- Expressed mathematically, the above facts give us: d C AB — k CAB d t If a is the original concentration of AB, then CAB time t is a - X and our equation becomes: ^ - = - k (a - X ) dt d (a - x) - - dx =. k (a - x) at Integration of this equation will yield an expression relating the concentration of AB and the time. The proportionality constant k is called the specific reaction rate. dx k dt (a - x) J In a kt a - X or k , 2.3C3 lo^ a t a - X In the same way the formuias for second and third order reactions may derived. In a second order reaction, where tvra possibilities exist, there are two different expressions for the specific reaction rate; in the case of third only one of the combinations possible is usually employed in order to simplify calculations. In a second order reaction of the type A T B ^ j A and B may be of different concentrations in v*rhich case the specific reaction constant is given by: k = 2-303 log b - X t(b - a) a - X or A and B may be of the same concentration in which case the specific reaction constant is given by: 1 - 1 k _ 01 -22- ti - X>2 In the case of a third where two of the reactants are of the same cpncentration and the third is of a different concentration the specific reaction rate is given by: k — 1 1 „ J 2x(2a-b) 2.303 log a(b-2x) L ~ t (b-2a)2 [_ b(b-2x) b(a-x) / One method of calculation of the order of the reaction is to substitute the experimental results in all three of the above equations, selecting the one which gives the most consistent values for k, A better approach to the problem would be to obtain a mathematical relationship betv/een dc/dt and n(the order of the reaction). In the reaction A+B+-C-*- +-X Y , where theie are n reactants of the same concentration c, the rate of reaction dc/dt is given by - dc/dt -- k c^. If n is one, then thds form reduces to the forinula previously derived for a first order equation. In an equation of a higher order, Integration results in a different form than that presented before. C I The kinetic equation tox a second order reaction where the initial concentrations of both reactants are equal is therefore: \ 4 ^x - ^, Since this is of the io»~-m , it is at once evident that 'GT a plot of ^/C'S Mr will yield a straight line. An actual relationship betv^een dc/dt and n may be derived by assuming at two different concentrations: — lM(^^ M. <Cx =. Ac X 'K TECHNIQUE OF DETERMINAriONS: A technique to foilow the course of this reaction must take into consideration the following facts: 1. Evaporation of acetic acid in the course of the reaction 2. Hydrolysis (reverse reaction) during analysis of the samples 3. High molarities producing a aiultiplication of small errors in the titrations After several methods were tried, the one finally arrived at reduced the effects of the above errors considerably. However they could not be eliminated completely. The usual technique is to place the desired concentrations of reactants in a flask and to withdraw samples for analysis at the stated time intervals. Since it v/as impossible to open the reaction vessel without loss of acetic acid, this method could not be used. The obvious aolution to this problem is to seal the reactants in the vessel and anatysae at time t without exposing the contents to the air. The only way that this could be done would be to analyze the entire contents of the reaction vessel. Therefore, by allowing the reaction to continue for a longer period in different vessels, the amounts changed at any time may be determined. however, since the original concentrations differ from one vessel to the next, correction factors must be applied so tnat the results will be comparable to each other. This latter is necessary for the plotting of curves. These correction factors will be discussed in the section on analysis of data and calculation of results. -6- In the successive analyses of concentrations at any time, it v;as found that the reaction reversed v^,ry readily in the presence of water to which the mixture was added to reduce its molarity to the same level as that of the base used in the titration. Since the amount of acetic acid regenerated by hydrolysis is dependent upon the temperature and the time, only one portion of the diluted mixture vms titrated and the titration v/as carried out at ©° 0. by means of ice. In order to reduce the last error the entire sample is diluted to five hundred cubic centimeters and twenty-five cubic centimetei'S withdrawn for immediate analysis. This requires only one analysis and only one titration with standard base, thus reducing the time and the errors. -7- PROCEDUKE; 1. Weigh to the nearest milligram a number of I5 cc test tubes equal to the number of time intervals desired. 2. Add the desired amount of propylene glycol from a pipette. This axiount is such that after the addition of acetic acid, the totai volume is always ten cubic centimeters, and such that the molar ratio of propylene glycol to acetic acid is definitely established. 3. Weigh the tubes again 4. At t equals 0 the correct quantity of acetic acid is added and the tubes quickly weighed. and placed in the constant teBiperature bath. 5. At the desired time intervals a tube is withdrawn and opened under water in a beaker; the tube is rinsed inside and out and the resulting solution diluted to $00 cc. 6; 2$ cc. of this solution are at once pipetted out and Bun into ice 7. This is immediately titrated with the proper normality base using phenolphthalein as an indicator. 8. The t equals 0 value is maSe in the same way except that the concentrated reactants are not mixed 'together; they are weighed separately and mixed after dilution; the diluted mixture is then brought up to a volume of $00 cc. and the analysis performed as above. -8- EXPERIMENTAI. DATA: I Data for the determination of order and rate Temperature - 40° centigrade a/b = 1 Tube # Tare Ht. after add. of- time Analysis-*- - propylene glycol -acetic acid cc of .1421 N NaOH Q 12,994 18.786 13.131''-16.693 0 22.21 16 12.927 18.666 23.217 1 day 27.40 17 13.226 18.920 23.449 2 days 26.15 18 13.581 19.307 24.000 4 days 25.38 * Additional tare is necessary according to method of analysis of tube 0. See number 8 under PROCEDURE. 11 Check upon evaporation effects on the resuxts'^'^ Tube # Tare^ Water c W't. after add. of- added -4.280^ -acetic acid time Analysis-^ 6 19.212c. 19.317 23.979 1 hour 29.20 11 19.781 19.879 24.489 2 hours 29.45 26 18.855 18.967 23.569 3 hours 29.55 31 18.468 18.577 23.134 4 hours 29.20 This was taken for a period of only 4 hours instead of for a period of a week as probably Siould nave been taken. However, the vConsItancy is indicated and will be shovm later. H. 2 Actual weight of water not necessary since only changes in acid concentration are measured. 1.
Recommended publications
  • WHITE LABEL PRODUCT INGREDIENTS All the Information You Need When Creating Your Own Label Artwork

    WHITE LABEL PRODUCT INGREDIENTS All the Information You Need When Creating Your Own Label Artwork

    WHITE LABEL PRODUCT INGREDIENTS All the information you need when creating your own label artwork. SPRAY TAN SOLUTION - LIGHT - 8% DHA INGREDIENTS: Aqua (Water), Dihydroxyacetone, Alcohol, Hamamelis Virginiana (Witch Hazel) Leaf Extract, Propylene Glycol, Caramel, Phenoxyethanol, Caprylyl Glycol, Potassium Sorbate, Hexylene Glycol, Polysorbate 20, Xanthan Gum, Glycerin, T-Butyl Alcohol, Helianthus Annuus (Sunflower) Seed Oil, Beta Vulgaris (Beet) Root Extract, Panthenol, Solanum Lycopersicum (Tomato) Fruit Extract, Vaccinium Macrocarpon (Cranberry) Fruit Extract, Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C), Tocopheryl Acetate (Vitamin E), Theobroma Cacao (Cocoa) Seed Butter, Rosa Canina (Rose Hip) Fruit Oil, Glycine Soja (Soybean) Oil, Cucumis Sativus (Cucumber) Fruit Extract, Brucine Sulfate, Yellow 5 (CI 19140), Green 5 (CI 61570), Red 40 (CI 16035), Red 33 (CI 17200), Blue 1 (CI 42090), Yellow 6 (CI 15985) SPRAY TAN SOLUTION - MEDIUM - 10% DHA INGREDIENTS: Aqua (Water), Dihydroxyacetone, Alcohol, Hamamelis Virginiana (Witch Hazel) Extract, Propylene Glycol, Caramel, Phenoxyethanol, Caprylyl Glycol, Potassium Sorbate, Hexylene Glycol, Polysorbate 20, Xanthan Gum, Glycerin, T-Butyl Alcohol, Helianthus Annuus (Sunflower) Seed Oil, Beta Vulgaris (Beet) Root Extract, Panthenol, Solanum Lycopersicum (Tomato) Fruit Extract, Vaccinium Macrocarpon (Cranberry) Fruit Extract, Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C), Tocopheryl Acetate (Vitamin E), Theobroma Cacao (Cocoa) Seed Butter, Rosa Canina (Rose Hip) Fruit Oil, Glycine Soja (Soybean) Oil, Cucumis Sativus (Cucumber) Fruit
  • Comparison of Ethylene Glycol and Propylene Glycol Based Aircraft

    Comparison of Ethylene Glycol and Propylene Glycol Based Aircraft

    Comparison of Ethylene Glycol- and Propylene Glycol-Based Aircraft Deicing Fluids Agenda • Executive Summary • Chemistry • Operational Properties (for the aircraft) o Freezing Point (efficiency) o Lowest Operational Use Temperature o Holdover Time and Allowance Times • Mammalian Toxicity o Operator Precautions • Environmental Toxicity o Aquatic Toxicity o Air Emissions / Vapor Pressure o Biodegradation Executive Summary • Both ethylene glycol- (EG) and propylene glycol- (PG) based aircraft deicing fluids (ADFs) consist of the base glycol plus water and additives • Operationally, EG-based fluids perform better: • Less EG is required to produce the same freezing point than PG. • Lower viscosity means EG-based fluids provide better aerodynamic performance at colder temperatures. • As a result, EG-based fluids have superior Holdover Times (HOTs) compared to PG-based fluids, as presented by the SAE G-12 HOT Committee in May 2017. • Mammalian Toxicity • EG and PG both have low to moderate acute toxicity. • If ingested in a large, single oral dose, EG is more toxic to mammals than PG. • Oral dosing is an unlikely route of exposure during deicing. • History in Canada, where EG fluids have been used safely for many years, confirms operator procedures can appropriately manage this risk. Executive Summary • Environmental Properties • EG-based fluids in concentrated form generally demonstrate better aquatic toxicity than PG-based fluids; however, both are non-toxic. • Mixtures of EG-based ADFs exhibit less air emissions than PG based fluids.1 • Both EG and PG are biodegradable in the environment and neither bio accumulates. • PG has higher Theoretical Oxygen Demand and requires a higher usage concentration than PG fluids.
  • PROPYLENE GLYCOL from GLYCERIN (December 2007)

    PROPYLENE GLYCOL from GLYCERIN (December 2007)

    Abstract Process Economics Program Report 262 PROPYLENE GLYCOL FROM GLYCERIN (December 2007) A variety of economic, environmental and technical factors have encouraged industry attention on producing industrial chemicals from bio-feedstocks, rather than from crude oil derivatives. One such example is producing propylene glycol (PG) from glycerine (GLY), rather than the conventional routes starting with propylene monomer. Propylene glycol has historically been produced in commercial quantities either via the chlorohydrin process or by peroxidation, both using propylene monomer as the starting material. Both routes produce propylene oxide (PO) as an intermediate chemical, which is then hydrated to propylene glycol. The peroxidation routes have evolved from those processes (Arco Chem/Lyondell, Repsol, Shell, BASF) producing a significant amount of by-product (PO/styrene monomer, PO/tertiary butyl alcohol, PO/ methyl tertiary butyl ether), to more recent processes developed by Solvay, Dow and BASF that eliminate the by-product by using hydrogen peroxide as the oxidizing agent. As of 2007, Degussa has announced the design and construction of a commercial scale PG plant using glycerine as its feedstock. Other companies have announced processes to use glycerine to produce polyols and epichlorohydrin. The combination of high crude oil prices and governmental subsidies to produce biofuels (bio-ethanol, bio-diesel) have resulted in an enormous increase in bio-diesel production, resulting in a glut of by-product glycerine (which represents 10% of biodiesel mass). As a result, glycerine market prices have fallen from $US 2/kg down to fuel value ($US 200/mt), or less. The low cost of glycerine combined with the high price of PG offers an opportunity to develop industrial scale processes converting glycerine to propylene glycol.
  • Boiling Points of the Propylene Glycol + Glycerol System at 1 Atmosphere Pressure: 188.6–292 °C Without and with Added Water Or Nicotine

    Boiling Points of the Propylene Glycol + Glycerol System at 1 Atmosphere Pressure: 188.6–292 °C Without and with Added Water Or Nicotine

    Portland State University PDXScholar Chemistry Faculty Publications and Presentations Chemistry 2018 Boiling Points of the Propylene Glycol + Glycerol System at 1 Atmosphere Pressure: 188.6–292 °c Without and with Added Water or Nicotine Anna K. Duell Portland State University, [email protected] James F. Pankow Portland State University, [email protected] Samantha M. Gillette Portland State University, [email protected] David H. Peyton Portland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/chem_fac Part of the Chemistry Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Duell, A. K., Pankow, J. F., Gillette, S. M., & Peyton, D. H. (2018). Boiling points of the propylene glycol + glycerol system at 1 atmosphere pressure: 188.6-292 °C without and with added water or nicotine. Chemical Engineering Communications, 205(12), 1691–1700. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00986445.2018.1468758 This Post-Print is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chemistry Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. 1 1 Full title: 2 Boiling Points of the Propylene Glycol + Glycerol System 3 at 1 Atmosphere Pressure: 188.6 to 292 °C 4 Short title: 5 Boiling Points: Propylene Glycol + Glycerol 6 7 Anna K. Duell, 1 James F. Pankow,1,2 David H. Peyton1,3 8 1Department of Chemistry, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, 97207, United States of 9 America 10 2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Portland State University, Portland, 11 Oregon, 97207, United States of America 12 3Corresponding author 13 E-mail: [email protected] (DP) 14 Phone number: 503-725-3875 15 16 Abstract 17 In electronic cigarettes (“electronic nicotine delivery systems”, ENDSs), mixtures of propylene 18 glycol (PG) and/or glycerol (GL; aka “vegetable glycerin”, VG) with nicotine are vaporized to 19 create a nicotine-containing aerosol.
  • Propylene Glycol

    Propylene Glycol

    PROPYLENEGLYCOL ____________________Name ____________________________________________DateDate alsocalled…methylethylglycol , propane-1,2-diol , 1,2-propanediol ,2-hydroxypropanol , 1,2-dihydroxypropane , isopropyleneglycol ,and E1520 . Whatisit? Propyleneglycolisusedasasofteningagent,solvent,moisturizer,preservativeor vehicleinmanypersonalproducts,medications,andindustry. Wheremightitbefound? Heattransferfluid Householdcleaningproducts Moisturizinglotion,cream Hydraulicpressfluid Make-up(foundation,concealer, Industrialsolvents lipstick,lipliner,lipbalm, Insecttrapcontents gloss,mascara,eyeliner) Paint,enamel,stain,deckcoat,varnish Hairproducts(shampoo,gel, Paintballingredient conditioner,color,minoxidil) Petshampoo,spray,deodorizer Soap,cleanser,bodywash Photographicchemical Bubblebath,showergel Pitfalltrapforgroundbeetles Handsanitizer,handcleaner Plasticizer,polyesterandalkydresins Moisttowelettes,babywipes Polyurethanecushions Toothpaste,toothwhiteners Printingfountaininksolution,rollerwash Mouthwash,coldsoreremedy Tiresealant Shavingcream,aftershavegel Tobaccohumectant,cigarhumidor Antiperspirant,deodorant Transcutaneous-nervestimulatorgel Cuticleremover Ultraviolettattooink Salinesolution Wallpaperstripper,drywallprimer Personallubricant Waterproofing,cracksealant Sunscreen,massageoil Treatmentforathletesfoot,itch, PGisinmanyprescriptions : acne,yeast,earache Most cortisone creams,ointments,lotions,gels Clindamycingel,sol’nKeralytGel OtherPossibleExposures: Dovonexsolution Ketoconazolecr,foam Aircraftde-icingfluid Efudexcream,sol’nMetronidazolegel
  • Propylene Glycol Dinitrate (PGDN) As an Explosive Taggant

    Propylene Glycol Dinitrate (PGDN) As an Explosive Taggant

    Central European Journal of Energetic Materials ISSN 1733-7178; e-ISSN 2353-1843 Copyright © 2016 Institute of Industrial Organic Chemistry, Poland Cent. Eur. J. Energ. Mater., 2016, 13(3), 627-640; DOI: 10.22211/cejem/65007 Propylene Glycol Dinitrate (PGDN) as an Explosive Taggant Hichem FETTAKA,* Michel H. LEFEBVRE Laboratory for Energetic Materials, Department of Chemistry, Royal Military Academy, Av. De la Renaissance 30, 1000 Brussels, Belgium * E-mail: h−[email protected] Abstract: Propylene Glycol Dinitrate (PGDN) is a liquid nitrate ester explosive which has been used as a gelatinating agent in some energetic formulations. The aim of the present work was to assess whether PGDN could be used as a detection taggant. The PGDN was synthesized in the laboratory using laboratory grade propylene glycol (PG). The purity of the synthesized PGDN was assessed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). A study of the thermal decomposition of PGDN was carried out using both DSC and thermogravimetry-mass spectrometry analysis (TG/MS) methods. The gases produced during thermal decomposition were identified by mass spectrometry and the influence of the heating rate was investigated. The duality of DSC-TGA was highlighted by studying the complementarity between these two methods. Vapour pressure and enthalpy of vaporisation of PGDN were considered as the foremost taggant characteristics, and were estimated using TGA and taking benzoic acid as the reference. The vapour pressure of PGDN at ambient temperature is 2.54 Pa, therefore the PGDN could be a good candidate as a detection taggant compared to other explosive taggants (Nitroglycerin, EGDN, DMNB and PDCB).
  • Propylene Glycol Cetearyl Alcohol Cyclopentasiloxane, Behentrimoni

    Propylene Glycol Cetearyl Alcohol Cyclopentasiloxane, Behentrimoni

    Express Miracle Silk Leave In * Ingredients: Aqua (Water/Eau) Propylene Glycol Cetearyl Alcohol Cyclopentasiloxane, Behentrimonium Chloride Quaternium-80 Fragrance/Parfum Panthenol, Hydrolyzed Silk, Morus Alba Leaf Extract, Elaeis Guineensis (Palm) Oil, Linalool, Benzyl Salicylate Limonene, Hydroxycitronellal, Butylphenyl Methylpropional, Eugenol, Coumarin Isoeugenol, Citral, Hexyl Cinnamal, Benzyl Alcohol, Benzyl Benzoate, Amyl Cinnamal, Geraniol Methylchloroisothiazolinone, Methylisothiazolinone Citric Acid. Express Miracle Silk Shampoo * Ingredients: Water/Aqua/Eau, Sodium Cocoyl Isethionate, Sodium Lauryl Sulfocetate, Disodium Laureth Sulfosuccinate, Disodium Laureth Sulfosuccinate, Cocamide MEA, Cocamidopropyl Betaine, Fragrance/Parfum, Decyl Glucoside, Gylcol Distearate, Amodimethicone, Dihydroxypropyl PEG-5 Linoleammonium Chloride, Divinyldimethicone/Dimethicone Copolymer, Glycereth-26, Hydrolyzed Silk, Morus Alba Leaf Extract, Elaeis Guineensis (Palm) Oil, Panthenol, Propylene Glycol, Butylene Gycol, Helianthus Annuus (Sunflower) Seed Extract, Cinnamidopropyltrimonium Chloride, Glycerin, Lauryl Alcohol, C11-15 Pareth-7, Guar Hydroxypropyltrimonium Chloride, Polyquatermium-7, C12-13 Pareth-23, C12-13 Pareth-3, Tetrasodium EDTA, Citric Acid, Laureth-9, Trideceth-12, Benzyl Salicylate, Linalool, Methylchloroisothiazolinone, Methylisothiazolinone. Miracle Blowdry Volumizer * Ingredients: Alcohol Denat, Water/Aqua/Eau, VP/VA Copolymer, Vinyl Caprolactam/ VP/ Dimethylaminoethyl Methacrylate Copolymer, Keratin Amino Acids, PEG-12 Dimethicone,
  • Ethylene Glycol

    Ethylene Glycol

    Ethylene Glycol 107-21-1 Hazard Summary Ethylene glycol has many uses, including as antifreeze in cooling and heating systems, in hydraulic brake fluids, and as a solvent. Acute (short-term) exposure of humans to ethylene glycol by ingesting large quantities causes three stages of health effects: central nervous system (CNS) depression, followed by cardiopulmonary effects, and later renal damage. The only effects noted in one study of individuals exposed to low levels of ethylene glycol by inhalation for about a month were throat and upper respiratory tract irritation. Rats and mice chronically (long-term) exposed to ethylene glycol in their diet exhibited signs of kidney toxicity and liver effects. Several studies of rodents exposed orally or by inhalation showed ethylene glycol to be fetotoxic. An epidemiologic study on renal cancer mortality did not find an increased risk for workers exposed to ethylene glycol. EPA has not classified ethylene glycol for carcinogenicity. Please Note: The main sources of information for this fact sheet are EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) (7), which contains information on oral chronic toxicity and the RfD, and the carcinogenic effects of ethylene glycol, and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry's Toxicological Profile for Ethylene Glycol and Propylene Glycol. (2) Uses Ethylene glycol is used as antifreeze in cooling and heating systems, in hydraulic brake fluids, as an industrial humectant, as an ingredient of electrolytic condensers, as a solvent in the paint and plastics industries, in the formulations of printers' inks, stamp pad inks, and inks for ballpoint pens, as a softening agent for cellophane, and in the synthesis of safety explosives, plasticizers, synthetic fibers (Terylene, Dacron), and synthetic waxes.
  • Detection of Diethylene Glycol in Glycerin and Propylene Glycol by Using High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography HPTLC M.Ph

    Detection of Diethylene Glycol in Glycerin and Propylene Glycol by Using High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography HPTLC M.Ph

    IOSR Journal of Pharmacy Vol. 1, Issue 1, Nov.-Dec, 2012, pp. 029-034 Detection of Diethylene Glycol in Glycerin and Propylene Glycol by using high performance thin layer chromatography HPTLC M.Ph. Huda Ghanem, Prof. Mhd Ammar Alkhayat, Prof. Mhd Amer Almardini Department of pharmaceutical chemistry and quality control, College of Pharmacy, Damascus University, Syria Abstract: We were developed analytical method rapid, sensitive and easy to use to detect Diethylene glycol (DEG) in some of excipients: Glycerin, and propylene glycol by using high-performance thin-layer chromatography HPTLC with plate fluorinated: HPTLC Plate silica gel 60 F 254, and with mobile phase: acetone: toluene: 5 M ammonium hydroxide at rates 85: 5:10, respectively. And Use a scanner with wavelength: 325 nm. This method allows the detection and assay of toxic Diethylene glycol in excipients: glycerin and propylene glycol in concentrations of not less than 0.1%. This method was verified the validity of it to conduct all the constitutional requirements. Keywords: Diethylene Glycol (DEG), Propylene Glycol (PG), Glycerin, Ethylene Glycol (EG, High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography (HPTLC). Introduction: (DEG( Diethylene Glycol : DEG: ( HO-CH2-CH2-O-CH2-CH2-OH( Diethylene glycol is Organic solvent has many industrial uses (1,2). DEG is classified as toxic material, it causes when dealing with multiple systemic disorders until the occurrence of acute kidney failure and death (3,4,5). Diethylene glycol has physical and chemical properties close to the properties of glycerin and propylene glycol, which is cheaper than both glycerin and propylene glycol, thus forcing some producers and sellers to cheat them with DEG (6,7,2).
  • Diethylene Glycol

    Diethylene Glycol

    Scientific Committee on Consumer Products SCCP OPINION ON Diethylene glycol The SCCP adopted this opinion at its 16th plenary of 24 June 2008 SCCP/1181/08 Opinion on diethylene glycol About the Scientific Committees Three independent non-food Scientific Committees provide the Commission with the scientific advice it needs when preparing policy and proposals relating to consumer safety, public health and the environment. The Committees also draw the Commission's attention to the new or emerging problems which may pose an actual or potential threat. They are: the Scientific Committee on Consumer Products (SCCP), the Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks (SCHER) and the Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) and are made up of external experts. In addition, the Commission relies upon the work of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), the European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA), the European Centre for Disease prevention and Control (ECDC) and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). SCCP Questions concerning the safety of consumer products (non-food products intended for the consumer). In particular, the Committee addresses questions related to the safety and allergenic properties of cosmetic products and ingredients with respect to their impact on consumer health, toys, textiles, clothing, personal care products, domestic products such as detergents and consumer services such as tattooing. Scientific Committee members Claire Chambers, Gisela Degen, Ruta Dubakiene, Bozena Jazwiec-Kanyion,
  • Ethylene Glycol Vs Propylene Glycol in Energy Recovery Systems

    Ethylene Glycol Vs Propylene Glycol in Energy Recovery Systems

    Ethylene Glycol vs Propylene Glycol In Energy Recovery Systems Background The environmental issues regarding ethylene and propylene glycol became a media topic in the early 1990’s when runoff from aircraft deicing activities was linked to harmful effects on aquatic organisms. Since that time extensive studies have been conducted and conclude that deicing fluid (both ethylene and propylene glycol) are harmful to aquatic organisms for two primary reasons. The principal concern regarding the environmental impacts of glycol entering natural waterways relates to the amount of dissolved oxygen in water being consumed during the decomposition of both ethylene and propylene glycol. Oxygen consumption occurs when bacteria decompose organic materials (including glycols) and use oxygen in the process. This phenomenon can deplete all dissolved oxygen from the water if the rate of decomposition is very high. Ethylene glycol is toxic to aquatic and mammalian organisms. For this reason it is being replaced, for now, by the less toxic propylene glycol for aircraft deicing. However, while ethylene glycol and propylene glycol are both biodegradable, propylene glycol degrades at a slower rate and has a greater biochemical oxygen demand. Thus, propylene glycol will remain in the environment longer than ethylene glycol and will consume more oxygen while it is being broken down. Therefore, it can still be harmful to the environment. Biodegradation Time Period of Ethylene and Propylene Glycol Ethylene Glycol: 10 – 30 days Propylene Glycol: More than 20 – 30 days Hazardous Substance If ingested, ethylene glycol can be fatal to humans and wildlife. For that reason, it is defined as a hazardous substance by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act which is enforced by the USEPA.
  • E59 - Propylene Glycol

    E59 - Propylene Glycol

    001-1501PDG.pdf 1 E59 - PROPYLENE GLYCOL 2 Propylenglycolum 3 4 C3H8O2 Mr 76.1 5 DEFINITION 6 (RS)-Propane-1,2-diol. 7 Content : minimum 99.7 per cent. 8 CHARACTERS 9 Appearance: viscous, clear, colourless, hygroscopic liquid. 10 Solubility: miscible with water and with ethanol (96 per cent). 11 IDENTIFICATION 12 Infrared absorption spectrophotometry. 13 Preparation: as a film between sodium chloride plates. 14 Comparison: propylene glycol reference standard (USP/EP). 15 propylene glycol reference spectrum (JP). 16 TESTS 17 Appearance. 18 It is clear (its clarity is the same as that of water or its opalescence is not more pronounced than that of 19 reference suspension I) and colourless as water or not more intensely coloured than the reference solution. 20 Primary solutions: 21 - Ferric chloride primary solution: a 45.0 g/L solution of ferric chloride (FeCl3, 6H2O). 22 - Cobalt chloride primary solution: a 59.5 g/L solution of cobalt chloride (CoCl2, 6H2O). 23 - Copper sulphate primary solution: a 62.4 g/L solution of copper sulpfate (CuSO4, H2O). 24 25 Reference solution: 26 Immediately before use, mix 3.0 mL of ferric chloride primary solution, 3.0 mL of cobalt chloride primary 27 solution, and 2.4 mL of cupric sulfate primary solution with 1.6 mL of hydrochloric acid (10 g/L HCl). 28 Dilute 1.0 mL of this solution to 100.0 mL with hydrochloric acid (10 g/L HCl). 29 Acidity. maximum 100 mg/l, calculated as CH3COOH. 30 To 50 ml of water, add 1 ml of phenolphthalein solution, then add 0.01 M sodium hydroxide until the 31 solution remains pink for 30 s.