DOCSLIB.ORG

Comparison of Ethylene Glycol and Propylene Glycol Based Aircraft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comparison of Ethylene Glycol and Propylene Glycol Based Aircraft Comparison of Ethylene Glycol- and Propylene Glycol-Based Aircraft Deicing Fluids Agenda • Executive Summary • Chemistry • Operational Properties (for the aircraft) o Freezing Point (efficiency) o Lowest Operational Use Temperature o Holdover Time and Allowance Times • Mammalian Toxicity o Operator Precautions • Environmental Toxicity o Aquatic Toxicity o Air Emissions / Vapor Pressure o Biodegradation Executive Summary • Both ethylene glycol- (EG) and propylene glycol- (PG) based aircraft deicing fluids (ADFs) consist of the base glycol plus water and additives • Operationally, EG-based fluids perform better: • Less EG is required to produce the same freezing point than PG. • Lower viscosity means EG-based fluids provide better aerodynamic performance at colder temperatures. • As a result, EG-based fluids have superior Holdover Times (HOTs) compared to PG-based fluids, as presented by the SAE G-12 HOT Committee in May 2017. • Mammalian Toxicity • EG and PG both have low to moderate acute toxicity. • If ingested in a large, single oral dose, EG is more toxic to mammals than PG. • Oral dosing is an unlikely route of exposure during deicing. • History in Canada, where EG fluids have been used safely for many years, confirms operator procedures can appropriately manage this risk. Executive Summary • Environmental Properties • EG-based fluids in concentrated form generally demonstrate better aquatic toxicity than PG-based fluids; however, both are non-toxic. • Mixtures of EG-based ADFs exhibit less air emissions than PG based fluids.1 • Both EG and PG are biodegradable in the environment and neither bio accumulates. • PG has higher Theoretical Oxygen Demand and requires a higher usage concentration than PG fluids. • The net effect is 30-45% higher Biochemical Oxygen Demand for airport operations using PG rather than EG on an equivalent freezing point basis. • Economic Comparison • EG fluids have historically had less volatile feedstocks than PG fluids, and that is expected to continue. • Supply of EG Fluids • The EG market in North America is large and diverse. There are 10 major producers of EG compared to 5 producers of PG. Total EG capacity is 4.1 million MT, compared to 0.8 million MT for PG • This EG supply can offer greater fluid reliability during peak weather events. 1 McCready, David, “Estimation of Glycol Air Emissions from Aircraft Deicing”. 91st Annual Meeting of Air & Waste Management Association, San Diego, California, 1998 EG and PG Fluid Chemistry EG/PG Ethylene Glycol (EG) HO-CH2CH2-OH Propylene Glycol (PG) HO-CH2CH -OH l CH3 EG and PG are the base chemicals to which ingredients are added to make deicing or anti-icing fluids. Formulated Fluid EG or PG plus water plus additives 5 Operational Properties Freezing Point Performance Freezing Point vs. Percent Glycol 7 Freezing Point Performance The lower the molecular weight, the more effective it is: Freezing Point vs. Percent Glycol EG (MW 62) is more efficient than PG (MW 76) Less EG is required to produce the same freezing point than PG When using Dow fluids, one needs 5-11% less volume, with 10% as the average over all temperature ranges. 8 Viscosity Performance • Solutions of ethylene glycol have lower viscosity than propylene glycol for the same freezing point. 50% EG at -20oC → ~22 mPa sec 52% PG at -20oC → ~85 mPa sec • Consequently, Type I EG-based fluids provide better aerodynamic performance at colder temperatures. 9 Aerodynamic Acceptance Limits of UCAR™ EG- and PG-based Type I Fluids Aircraft Type EG PG High Speed -45C -34C Low Speed -40C -25C ™Trademark of The Dow Chemical Company ("Dow") or an affiliated company of Dow Type II/IV Generic HOTs – Cold Temperature *Transport Canada will include single HOT value in very light snow cells Data from “Changes to HOT Guidelines for Winter 2017-18” as presented by SAE G-12 HOT Committee, Athens Greece – May 23, 2017 11 New Type II/IV Fluid-Specific HOTs – Cold Temperature LOUT = -22.5 oC LOUT = -22.5 oC *Transport Canada will include single HOT value in very light snow cells Data from “Changes to HOT Guidelines for Winter 2017-18” as presented by SAE G-12 12 HOT Committee, Athens Greece – May 23, 2017 New Type II/IV Fluid-Specific HOTs – Cold Temperature 67% - 74% 50% - 67% 32% - 50% 78% - 83% 40% - 71% 30% - 40% 71% - 82% 50% - 71% 35% - 50% 33% - 35% 25% - 33% 15% - 25% 33% - 39% 23% - 33% 10% - 23% 33% - 39% 23% - 33% 15% - 23% 25% - 29% 18% -25% 10% - 18% 25% - 29% 15% - 25% 5% - 15% 25% - 29% 15% - 25% 10% - 15% 90% - 100% 70% - 90% 90% 100% 100% 100% 133% - 171% 130% - 170% 80% - 130% 44% - 48% 38% - 44% 90% 100% 100% 100% LOUT = -22.5 oC 31% - 33% 20% - 31% 90% 100% 100% 100% LOUT = -22.5 oC Comparison to EG106 derived from “Changes to HOT Guidelines for Winter 2017-18” 13 as presented by SAE G-12 HOT Committee, Athens Greece – May 23, 2017 Ice Pellet and Small Hail Allowance Time There are several performance advantages for EG- vs PG-based fluids when considering ice pellet and small hail allowance time: Temperature EG PG -5 ºC and Above 25 minutes 15 minutes No allowance times 5 - 30 minutes for aircraft with exists when used on rotation speeds of 100 knots Below -10 ºC aircraft with rotation or greater (varies depending speeds less than 115 on conditions) knots Data from page 45 in FAA Holdover Time Guidelines Winter 2016-2017 original issue Aug 5, 2016 14 Mammalian Toxicity Mammalian Toxicity • EG and PG are chemicals of low to moderate acute toxicity. • EG is more toxic to mammals than PG when ingested. • Hazard is a large, single oral dose resulting in metabolic saturation. • Oral dosing is an unlikely route of exposure during deicing. 16 Mammalian Toxicity Summary 17 ADF Operator Recommendations • Studies have shown that exposures during deicer application are well below occupational exposure limits; however, this may not apply to every set-up and situation. • For most conditions, respiratory protection should not be necessary. • If employees want added protection in circumstances that do not exceed applicable exposure limits and discomfort is not experienced, then an air purifying respirator such as a P-series (P95) filtering face piece/dust mask is recommended. • If employees are experiencing discomfort or applicable exposure limits are exceeded, then the recommended respiratory protection for applications is an air purifying respirator with organic vapor/P95 pre-filter cartridges. Note: The P-series filters are recommended by the respirator manufacturers for use with ethylene glycol (aerosol). According to 3M, P-series filters have been recommended for ethylene glycol aerosol pending more research as to how EG affects the filter fibers. 18 Environmental Properties U.S. Transportation Information UCAR™ PG ADF Concentrate UCAR™ ADF Concentrate (EG) ™Trademark of The Dow Chemical Company ("Dow") or an affiliated company of Dow Aquatic Toxicity: Pure Glycols Higher numbers are better 60,000 EG 50,000 PG 40,000 Fathead Minnow mg/L 30,000 96 hr LC 50 20,000 Rainbow Trout 72 hr LC 50 10,000 Daphnia Magna 0 48 hr LC 50 Fathead Rainbow Daphnia Minnow Trout Magna U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Classification System for Acute Exposures defines "relatively non-toxic" as anything above 1000 mg/L. 21 Aquatic Toxicity: UCAR™ Deicing Fluids in Concentrated Form (92% EG, 88% PG) Higher numbers are better 40,000 EG 35,000 PG 30,000 25,000 Fathead Minnow mg/L 20,000 96 hr LC 50 15,000 Rainbow Trout 10,000 96 hr LC 50 5,000 Daphnia Magna 0 48 hr LC 50 Fathead Rainbow Daphnia Minnow Trout Magna U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Classification System for Acute Exposures defines "relatively non-toxic" as anything above 1000 mg/L. 22 Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) Guidelines • 100 mg/L EG • 100 mg/L PG 23 Air Emissions – PG vs. EG Air Emissions Mixtures of EG based ADFs (lbs glycol per 10,000 gal applied) exhibit less air emissions than 9 PG based fluids. 8 7 6 5 lbs 4 3 2 1 0 EG 50/50 PG 55/45 Deicing Fluid Deicing Fluid McCready, David, “Estimation of Glycol Air Emissions from Aircraft Deicing”. 91st Annual Meeting of Air & Waste Management Association, San Diego, California, 1998 Vapor Pressure Comparison 250 WATER - 100 VOL% 200 PG - 50 VOL% EG - 50 VOL% 150 100 Pressure (mmHg) Pressure 50 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Temperature (oC) Biodegradation: Pure Glycols % Degraded at 20 days, 20º C: • EG 97% • PG 87% • Both glycols are biodegradable in the environment. • Both glycols do not bio accumulate. 26 Theoretical Oxygen Demand (ThOD) Mg of Oxygen Required to Degrade 1 mg of glycol • Less is Better… • The lower the number, the less oxygen depleted from receiving 1.8 waters. 1.6 1.4 • 1.68 (PG) /1.29 (EG) = 1.30 1.2 (30% less ThOD for EG) 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Ethlyene Glycol Propylene Glycol 27 Net Effect of EG versus PG on BOD Loading • PG has higher Theoretical Oxygen Demand (ThOD 30%, slide 23) and requires a higher usage concentration (5-15% due to PG’s higher MW, slide 6). • Net effect is 30-45% higher Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) for airport operations using PG rather than EG on an equivalent freezing point basis. 28 Review • Chemistry • Operational Properties (for the aircraft) • Mammalian Toxicity • Environmental Toxicity Contact Us United States and Canada Call toll-free 1-800-447-4369 Call 1-989-832-1560 NOTICE: No freedom from infringement of any patent owned by Dow or others is to be inferred. Because use conditions and applicable laws may differ from one location to another and may change with time, Customer is responsible for determining whether products and the information in this document are appropriate for Customer's use and for ensuring that Customer's workplace and disposal practices are in compliance with applicable laws and other government enactments.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WHITE LABEL PRODUCT INGREDIENTS All the Information You Need When Creating Your Own Label Artwork
    WHITE LABEL PRODUCT INGREDIENTS All the information you need when creating your own label artwork. SPRAY TAN SOLUTION - LIGHT - 8% DHA INGREDIENTS: Aqua (Water), Dihydroxyacetone, Alcohol, Hamamelis Virginiana (Witch Hazel) Leaf Extract, Propylene Glycol, Caramel, Phenoxyethanol, Caprylyl Glycol, Potassium Sorbate, Hexylene Glycol, Polysorbate 20, Xanthan Gum, Glycerin, T-Butyl Alcohol, Helianthus Annuus (Sunflower) Seed Oil, Beta Vulgaris (Beet) Root Extract, Panthenol, Solanum Lycopersicum (Tomato) Fruit Extract, Vaccinium Macrocarpon (Cranberry) Fruit Extract, Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C), Tocopheryl Acetate (Vitamin E), Theobroma Cacao (Cocoa) Seed Butter, Rosa Canina (Rose Hip) Fruit Oil, Glycine Soja (Soybean) Oil, Cucumis Sativus (Cucumber) Fruit Extract, Brucine Sulfate, Yellow 5 (CI 19140), Green 5 (CI 61570), Red 40 (CI 16035), Red 33 (CI 17200), Blue 1 (CI 42090), Yellow 6 (CI 15985) SPRAY TAN SOLUTION - MEDIUM - 10% DHA INGREDIENTS: Aqua (Water), Dihydroxyacetone, Alcohol, Hamamelis Virginiana (Witch Hazel) Extract, Propylene Glycol, Caramel, Phenoxyethanol, Caprylyl Glycol, Potassium Sorbate, Hexylene Glycol, Polysorbate 20, Xanthan Gum, Glycerin, T-Butyl Alcohol, Helianthus Annuus (Sunflower) Seed Oil, Beta Vulgaris (Beet) Root Extract, Panthenol, Solanum Lycopersicum (Tomato) Fruit Extract, Vaccinium Macrocarpon (Cranberry) Fruit Extract, Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C), Tocopheryl Acetate (Vitamin E), Theobroma Cacao (Cocoa) Seed Butter, Rosa Canina (Rose Hip) Fruit Oil, Glycine Soja (Soybean) Oil, Cucumis Sativus (Cucumber) Fruit
    [Show full text]
  • PROPYLENE GLYCOL from GLYCERIN (December 2007)
    Abstract Process Economics Program Report 262 PROPYLENE GLYCOL FROM GLYCERIN (December 2007) A variety of economic, environmental and technical factors have encouraged industry attention on producing industrial chemicals from bio-feedstocks, rather than from crude oil derivatives. One such example is producing propylene glycol (PG) from glycerine (GLY), rather than the conventional routes starting with propylene monomer. Propylene glycol has historically been produced in commercial quantities either via the chlorohydrin process or by peroxidation, both using propylene monomer as the starting material. Both routes produce propylene oxide (PO) as an intermediate chemical, which is then hydrated to propylene glycol. The peroxidation routes have evolved from those processes (Arco Chem/Lyondell, Repsol, Shell, BASF) producing a significant amount of by-product (PO/styrene monomer, PO/tertiary butyl alcohol, PO/ methyl tertiary butyl ether), to more recent processes developed by Solvay, Dow and BASF that eliminate the by-product by using hydrogen peroxide as the oxidizing agent. As of 2007, Degussa has announced the design and construction of a commercial scale PG plant using glycerine as its feedstock. Other companies have announced processes to use glycerine to produce polyols and epichlorohydrin. The combination of high crude oil prices and governmental subsidies to produce biofuels (bio-ethanol, bio-diesel) have resulted in an enormous increase in bio-diesel production, resulting in a glut of by-product glycerine (which represents 10% of biodiesel mass). As a result, glycerine market prices have fallen from $US 2/kg down to fuel value ($US 200/mt), or less. The low cost of glycerine combined with the high price of PG offers an opportunity to develop industrial scale processes converting glycerine to propylene glycol.
    [Show full text]
  • Boiling Points of the Propylene Glycol + Glycerol System at 1 Atmosphere Pressure: 188.6–292 °C Without and with Added Water Or Nicotine
    Portland State University PDXScholar Chemistry Faculty Publications and Presentations Chemistry 2018 Boiling Points of the Propylene Glycol + Glycerol System at 1 Atmosphere Pressure: 188.6–292 °c Without and with Added Water or Nicotine Anna K. Duell Portland State University, [email protected] James F. Pankow Portland State University, [email protected] Samantha M. Gillette Portland State University, [email protected] David H. Peyton Portland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/chem_fac Part of the Chemistry Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Duell, A. K., Pankow, J. F., Gillette, S. M., & Peyton, D. H. (2018). Boiling points of the propylene glycol + glycerol system at 1 atmosphere pressure: 188.6-292 °C without and with added water or nicotine. Chemical Engineering Communications, 205(12), 1691–1700. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00986445.2018.1468758 This Post-Print is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chemistry Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. 1 1 Full title: 2 Boiling Points of the Propylene Glycol + Glycerol System 3 at 1 Atmosphere Pressure: 188.6 to 292 °C 4 Short title: 5 Boiling Points: Propylene Glycol + Glycerol 6 7 Anna K. Duell, 1 James F. Pankow,1,2 David H. Peyton1,3 8 1Department of Chemistry, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon, 97207, United States of 9 America 10 2Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Portland State University, Portland, 11 Oregon, 97207, United States of America 12 3Corresponding author 13 E-mail: [email protected] (DP) 14 Phone number: 503-725-3875 15 16 Abstract 17 In electronic cigarettes (“electronic nicotine delivery systems”, ENDSs), mixtures of propylene 18 glycol (PG) and/or glycerol (GL; aka “vegetable glycerin”, VG) with nicotine are vaporized to 19 create a nicotine-containing aerosol.
    [Show full text]
  • Propylene Glycol
    PROPYLENEGLYCOL ____________________Name ____________________________________________DateDate alsocalled…methylethylglycol , propane-1,2-diol , 1,2-propanediol ,2-hydroxypropanol , 1,2-dihydroxypropane , isopropyleneglycol ,and E1520 . Whatisit? Propyleneglycolisusedasasofteningagent,solvent,moisturizer,preservativeor vehicleinmanypersonalproducts,medications,andindustry. Wheremightitbefound? Heattransferfluid Householdcleaningproducts Moisturizinglotion,cream Hydraulicpressfluid Make-up(foundation,concealer, Industrialsolvents lipstick,lipliner,lipbalm, Insecttrapcontents gloss,mascara,eyeliner) Paint,enamel,stain,deckcoat,varnish Hairproducts(shampoo,gel, Paintballingredient conditioner,color,minoxidil) Petshampoo,spray,deodorizer Soap,cleanser,bodywash Photographicchemical Bubblebath,showergel Pitfalltrapforgroundbeetles Handsanitizer,handcleaner Plasticizer,polyesterandalkydresins Moisttowelettes,babywipes Polyurethanecushions Toothpaste,toothwhiteners Printingfountaininksolution,rollerwash Mouthwash,coldsoreremedy Tiresealant Shavingcream,aftershavegel Tobaccohumectant,cigarhumidor Antiperspirant,deodorant Transcutaneous-nervestimulatorgel Cuticleremover Ultraviolettattooink Salinesolution Wallpaperstripper,drywallprimer Personallubricant Waterproofing,cracksealant Sunscreen,massageoil Treatmentforathletesfoot,itch, PGisinmanyprescriptions : acne,yeast,earache Most cortisone creams,ointments,lotions,gels Clindamycingel,sol’nKeralytGel OtherPossibleExposures: Dovonexsolution Ketoconazolecr,foam Aircraftde-icingfluid Efudexcream,sol’nMetronidazolegel
    [Show full text]
  • Propylene Glycol Dinitrate (PGDN) As an Explosive Taggant
    Central European Journal of Energetic Materials ISSN 1733-7178; e-ISSN 2353-1843 Copyright © 2016 Institute of Industrial Organic Chemistry, Poland Cent. Eur. J. Energ. Mater., 2016, 13(3), 627-640; DOI: 10.22211/cejem/65007 Propylene Glycol Dinitrate (PGDN) as an Explosive Taggant Hichem FETTAKA,* Michel H. LEFEBVRE Laboratory for Energetic Materials, Department of Chemistry, Royal Military Academy, Av. De la Renaissance 30, 1000 Brussels, Belgium * E-mail: h−[email protected] Abstract: Propylene Glycol Dinitrate (PGDN) is a liquid nitrate ester explosive which has been used as a gelatinating agent in some energetic formulations. The aim of the present work was to assess whether PGDN could be used as a detection taggant. The PGDN was synthesized in the laboratory using laboratory grade propylene glycol (PG). The purity of the synthesized PGDN was assessed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). A study of the thermal decomposition of PGDN was carried out using both DSC and thermogravimetry-mass spectrometry analysis (TG/MS) methods. The gases produced during thermal decomposition were identified by mass spectrometry and the influence of the heating rate was investigated. The duality of DSC-TGA was highlighted by studying the complementarity between these two methods. Vapour pressure and enthalpy of vaporisation of PGDN were considered as the foremost taggant characteristics, and were estimated using TGA and taking benzoic acid as the reference. The vapour pressure of PGDN at ambient temperature is 2.54 Pa, therefore the PGDN could be a good candidate as a detection taggant compared to other explosive taggants (Nitroglycerin, EGDN, DMNB and PDCB).
    [Show full text]
  • Propylene Glycol Cetearyl Alcohol Cyclopentasiloxane, Behentrimoni
    Express Miracle Silk Leave In * Ingredients: Aqua (Water/Eau) Propylene Glycol Cetearyl Alcohol Cyclopentasiloxane, Behentrimonium Chloride Quaternium-80 Fragrance/Parfum Panthenol, Hydrolyzed Silk, Morus Alba Leaf Extract, Elaeis Guineensis (Palm) Oil, Linalool, Benzyl Salicylate Limonene, Hydroxycitronellal, Butylphenyl Methylpropional, Eugenol, Coumarin Isoeugenol, Citral, Hexyl Cinnamal, Benzyl Alcohol, Benzyl Benzoate, Amyl Cinnamal, Geraniol Methylchloroisothiazolinone, Methylisothiazolinone Citric Acid. Express Miracle Silk Shampoo * Ingredients: Water/Aqua/Eau, Sodium Cocoyl Isethionate, Sodium Lauryl Sulfocetate, Disodium Laureth Sulfosuccinate, Disodium Laureth Sulfosuccinate, Cocamide MEA, Cocamidopropyl Betaine, Fragrance/Parfum, Decyl Glucoside, Gylcol Distearate, Amodimethicone, Dihydroxypropyl PEG-5 Linoleammonium Chloride, Divinyldimethicone/Dimethicone Copolymer, Glycereth-26, Hydrolyzed Silk, Morus Alba Leaf Extract, Elaeis Guineensis (Palm) Oil, Panthenol, Propylene Glycol, Butylene Gycol, Helianthus Annuus (Sunflower) Seed Extract, Cinnamidopropyltrimonium Chloride, Glycerin, Lauryl Alcohol, C11-15 Pareth-7, Guar Hydroxypropyltrimonium Chloride, Polyquatermium-7, C12-13 Pareth-23, C12-13 Pareth-3, Tetrasodium EDTA, Citric Acid, Laureth-9, Trideceth-12, Benzyl Salicylate, Linalool, Methylchloroisothiazolinone, Methylisothiazolinone. Miracle Blowdry Volumizer * Ingredients: Alcohol Denat, Water/Aqua/Eau, VP/VA Copolymer, Vinyl Caprolactam/ VP/ Dimethylaminoethyl Methacrylate Copolymer, Keratin Amino Acids, PEG-12 Dimethicone,
    [Show full text]
  • Ethylene Glycol
    Ethylene Glycol 107-21-1 Hazard Summary Ethylene glycol has many uses, including as antifreeze in cooling and heating systems, in hydraulic brake fluids, and as a solvent. Acute (short-term) exposure of humans to ethylene glycol by ingesting large quantities causes three stages of health effects: central nervous system (CNS) depression, followed by cardiopulmonary effects, and later renal damage. The only effects noted in one study of individuals exposed to low levels of ethylene glycol by inhalation for about a month were throat and upper respiratory tract irritation. Rats and mice chronically (long-term) exposed to ethylene glycol in their diet exhibited signs of kidney toxicity and liver effects. Several studies of rodents exposed orally or by inhalation showed ethylene glycol to be fetotoxic. An epidemiologic study on renal cancer mortality did not find an increased risk for workers exposed to ethylene glycol. EPA has not classified ethylene glycol for carcinogenicity. Please Note: The main sources of information for this fact sheet are EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) (7), which contains information on oral chronic toxicity and the RfD, and the carcinogenic effects of ethylene glycol, and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry's Toxicological Profile for Ethylene Glycol and Propylene Glycol. (2) Uses Ethylene glycol is used as antifreeze in cooling and heating systems, in hydraulic brake fluids, as an industrial humectant, as an ingredient of electrolytic condensers, as a solvent in the paint and plastics industries, in the formulations of printers' inks, stamp pad inks, and inks for ballpoint pens, as a softening agent for cellophane, and in the synthesis of safety explosives, plasticizers, synthetic fibers (Terylene, Dacron), and synthetic waxes.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection of Diethylene Glycol in Glycerin and Propylene Glycol by Using High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography HPTLC M.Ph
    IOSR Journal of Pharmacy Vol. 1, Issue 1, Nov.-Dec, 2012, pp. 029-034 Detection of Diethylene Glycol in Glycerin and Propylene Glycol by using high performance thin layer chromatography HPTLC M.Ph. Huda Ghanem, Prof. Mhd Ammar Alkhayat, Prof. Mhd Amer Almardini Department of pharmaceutical chemistry and quality control, College of Pharmacy, Damascus University, Syria Abstract: We were developed analytical method rapid, sensitive and easy to use to detect Diethylene glycol (DEG) in some of excipients: Glycerin, and propylene glycol by using high-performance thin-layer chromatography HPTLC with plate fluorinated: HPTLC Plate silica gel 60 F 254, and with mobile phase: acetone: toluene: 5 M ammonium hydroxide at rates 85: 5:10, respectively. And Use a scanner with wavelength: 325 nm. This method allows the detection and assay of toxic Diethylene glycol in excipients: glycerin and propylene glycol in concentrations of not less than 0.1%. This method was verified the validity of it to conduct all the constitutional requirements. Keywords: Diethylene Glycol (DEG), Propylene Glycol (PG), Glycerin, Ethylene Glycol (EG, High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography (HPTLC). Introduction: (DEG( Diethylene Glycol : DEG: ( HO-CH2-CH2-O-CH2-CH2-OH( Diethylene glycol is Organic solvent has many industrial uses (1,2). DEG is classified as toxic material, it causes when dealing with multiple systemic disorders until the occurrence of acute kidney failure and death (3,4,5). Diethylene glycol has physical and chemical properties close to the properties of glycerin and propylene glycol, which is cheaper than both glycerin and propylene glycol, thus forcing some producers and sellers to cheat them with DEG (6,7,2).
    [Show full text]
  • Diethylene Glycol
    Scientific Committee on Consumer Products SCCP OPINION ON Diethylene glycol The SCCP adopted this opinion at its 16th plenary of 24 June 2008 SCCP/1181/08 Opinion on diethylene glycol About the Scientific Committees Three independent non-food Scientific Committees provide the Commission with the scientific advice it needs when preparing policy and proposals relating to consumer safety, public health and the environment. The Committees also draw the Commission's attention to the new or emerging problems which may pose an actual or potential threat. They are: the Scientific Committee on Consumer Products (SCCP), the Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks (SCHER) and the Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) and are made up of external experts. In addition, the Commission relies upon the work of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), the European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA), the European Centre for Disease prevention and Control (ECDC) and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). SCCP Questions concerning the safety of consumer products (non-food products intended for the consumer). In particular, the Committee addresses questions related to the safety and allergenic properties of cosmetic products and ingredients with respect to their impact on consumer health, toys, textiles, clothing, personal care products, domestic products such as detergents and consumer services such as tattooing. Scientific Committee members Claire Chambers, Gisela Degen, Ruta Dubakiene, Bozena Jazwiec-Kanyion,
    [Show full text]
  • Ethylene Glycol Vs Propylene Glycol in Energy Recovery Systems
    Ethylene Glycol vs Propylene Glycol In Energy Recovery Systems Background The environmental issues regarding ethylene and propylene glycol became a media topic in the early 1990’s when runoff from aircraft deicing activities was linked to harmful effects on aquatic organisms. Since that time extensive studies have been conducted and conclude that deicing fluid (both ethylene and propylene glycol) are harmful to aquatic organisms for two primary reasons. The principal concern regarding the environmental impacts of glycol entering natural waterways relates to the amount of dissolved oxygen in water being consumed during the decomposition of both ethylene and propylene glycol. Oxygen consumption occurs when bacteria decompose organic materials (including glycols) and use oxygen in the process. This phenomenon can deplete all dissolved oxygen from the water if the rate of decomposition is very high. Ethylene glycol is toxic to aquatic and mammalian organisms. For this reason it is being replaced, for now, by the less toxic propylene glycol for aircraft deicing. However, while ethylene glycol and propylene glycol are both biodegradable, propylene glycol degrades at a slower rate and has a greater biochemical oxygen demand. Thus, propylene glycol will remain in the environment longer than ethylene glycol and will consume more oxygen while it is being broken down. Therefore, it can still be harmful to the environment. Biodegradation Time Period of Ethylene and Propylene Glycol Ethylene Glycol: 10 – 30 days Propylene Glycol: More than 20 – 30 days Hazardous Substance If ingested, ethylene glycol can be fatal to humans and wildlife. For that reason, it is defined as a hazardous substance by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act which is enforced by the USEPA.
    [Show full text]
  • E59 - Propylene Glycol
    001-1501PDG.pdf 1 E59 - PROPYLENE GLYCOL 2 Propylenglycolum 3 4 C3H8O2 Mr 76.1 5 DEFINITION 6 (RS)-Propane-1,2-diol. 7 Content : minimum 99.7 per cent. 8 CHARACTERS 9 Appearance: viscous, clear, colourless, hygroscopic liquid. 10 Solubility: miscible with water and with ethanol (96 per cent). 11 IDENTIFICATION 12 Infrared absorption spectrophotometry. 13 Preparation: as a film between sodium chloride plates. 14 Comparison: propylene glycol reference standard (USP/EP). 15 propylene glycol reference spectrum (JP). 16 TESTS 17 Appearance. 18 It is clear (its clarity is the same as that of water or its opalescence is not more pronounced than that of 19 reference suspension I) and colourless as water or not more intensely coloured than the reference solution. 20 Primary solutions: 21 - Ferric chloride primary solution: a 45.0 g/L solution of ferric chloride (FeCl3, 6H2O). 22 - Cobalt chloride primary solution: a 59.5 g/L solution of cobalt chloride (CoCl2, 6H2O). 23 - Copper sulphate primary solution: a 62.4 g/L solution of copper sulpfate (CuSO4, H2O). 24 25 Reference solution: 26 Immediately before use, mix 3.0 mL of ferric chloride primary solution, 3.0 mL of cobalt chloride primary 27 solution, and 2.4 mL of cupric sulfate primary solution with 1.6 mL of hydrochloric acid (10 g/L HCl). 28 Dilute 1.0 mL of this solution to 100.0 mL with hydrochloric acid (10 g/L HCl). 29 Acidity. maximum 100 mg/l, calculated as CH3COOH. 30 To 50 ml of water, add 1 ml of phenolphthalein solution, then add 0.01 M sodium hydroxide until the 31 solution remains pink for 30 s.
    [Show full text]
  • Acetic Acid Otic Solution Usp, 2%
    ACETIC ACID- acetic acid solution Morton Grove Pharmaceuticals, Inc. ---------- ACETIC ACID OTIC SOLUTION USP, 2% DESCRIPTION Acetic Acid Otic Solution, USP is a nonaqueous solution of glacial acetic acid, USP (2%), in a propylene glycol vehicle containing benzethonium chloride, USP (0.02%); propylene glycol diacetate, NF (3%) and sodium acetate, USP (0.015%). It may also contain citric acid, USP. The molecular formula for acetic acid is CH3COOH, with a molecular weight of 60.05. The structural formula is: Acetic Acid Otic Solution is available as a nonaqueous otic solution buffered at pH 3 for use in the external ear canal. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY Acetic acid is anti-bacterial and anti-fungal; propylene glycol is hydrophilic and provides a low surface tension; benzethonium chloride is a surface active agent that promotes contact of the solution with tissues. INDICATIONS AND USAGE For the treatment of superficial infections of the external auditory canal caused by organisms susceptible to the action of the antimicrobial. CONTRAINDICATIONS Hypersensitivity to Acetic Acid Otic Solution or any of the ingredients. Perforated tympanic membrane is considered a contraindication to the use of any medication in the external ear canal. WARNINGS Discontinue promptly if sensitization or irritation occurs. PRECAUTIONS Transient stinging or burning may be noted occasionally when the solution is first instilled into the acutely inflamed ear. Pediatric Use Safety and Effectiveness in pediatric patients below the age of 3 years have not been established. ADVERSE REACTIONS Stinging or burning may be noted occasionally; local irritation has occurred very rarely. DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION Carefully remove all cerumen and debris to allow Acetic Acid Otic Solution to contact infected surfaces directly.
    [Show full text]