The Anglo-Saxon World Pdf, Epub, Ebook

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Anglo-Saxon World Pdf, Epub, Ebook THE ANGLO-SAXON WORLD PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Nicholas Higham,M. J. Ryan | 496 pages | 01 Nov 2015 | Yale University Press | 9780300216134 | English | New Haven, United States The Anglo-Saxon World Product Details Price. Earn money by sharing your favorite books through our Affiliate program. Become an affiliate. About the Author N. Higham is professor emeritus, University of Manchester. Ryan is a former lecturer in early medieval history, University of Manchester. Drawing on a rich array of sources and disciplines such as historical genetics, paleobotany, and numismatics, the authors use primary material, illustrations, maps, photographs and genealogies to bring alive a part of history which 'witnessed the birth of the English people, the establishment of Christianity and the development of the English language. You could hardly have a better, more timely, and more attractive demonstration of why the Anglo-Saxons still matter to us. Complementing this treasure trove of information is a series of superb maps, we well as generous quantities of big, coloum either. But this is no picture book. Higham and Ryan do not dumb down for their readers. The authors demonstrate that they are writing about a serious subject worthy of serious consideration. Higham and Ryan, marshalling the latest research from archaeology, genetics, paleobotany, and even plain old literary studies By its very nature, The Anglo Saxon World represents a factual advance over all similar volumes that have preceded it, but the passion of its enthusiasms is its main recommendation. Our authors have a big, sprawling story to tell — of ornate tombs and sword-hacked skulls, of gorgeous handcrafts and marauding Vikings, and of some remarkable warrior-kings who stitched a country together out of fragments left behind by the most powerful empire the world had ever seen — and they tell it exceedingly well. You could hardly have a better, more timely, and more attractive demonstration of why the Anglo-Saxons still matter to us. The book is immensely readable, and the new scientific and archaeological evidence it presents is bound to fascinate students. Karkov, University of Leeds, UK. The prestige, and indeed the pretensions, of the monarchy increased, the institutions of government strengthened, and kings and their agents sought in various ways to establish social order. David Dumville suggests that Edward may have extended this policy by rewarding his supporters with grants of land in the territories newly conquered from the Danes and that any charters issued in respect of such grants have not survived. From that point on there was no contest for the throne, so the house of Wessex became the ruling house of England. He was uncompromising in his insistence on respect for the law. However this legislation also reveals the persistent difficulties which confronted the king and his councillors in bringing a troublesome people under some form of control. His claim to be "king of the English" was by no means widely recognised. In his formal address to the gathering at Winchester the king urged his bishops, abbots and abbesses "to be of one mind as regards monastic usage. Athelstan's court had been an intellectual incubator. This put all the monks and nuns in England under one set of detailed customs for the first time. In , Edgar received a special second, 'imperial coronation' at Bath, and from this point England was ruled by Edgar under the strong influence of Dunstan, Athelwold, and Oswald , the Bishop of Worcester. Raids began on a relatively small scale in the s but became far more serious in the s, and brought the people to their knees in —12, when a large part of the country was devastated by the army of Thorkell the Tall. The raids exposed tensions and weaknesses which went deep into the fabric of the late Anglo-Saxon state, and it is apparent that events proceeded against a background more complex than the chronicler probably knew. The final struggles were complicated by internal dissension, and especially by the treacherous acts of Ealdorman Eadric of Mercia, who opportunistically changed sides to Cnut's party. After the defeat of the English in the Battle of Assandun in October , Edmund and Cnut agreed to divide the kingdom so that Edmund would rule Wessex and Cnut Mercia, but Edmund died soon after his defeat in November , making it possible for Cnut to seize power over all England. In the 11th century, there were three conquests: one by Cnut in ; the second was an unsuccessful attempt of Battle of Stamford Bridge in ; and the third was conducted by William of Normandy in The consequences of each conquest changed the Anglo- Saxon culture. Politically and chronologically, the texts of this period are not Anglo-Saxon; linguistically, those written in English as opposed to Latin or French, the other official written languages of the period moved away from the late West Saxon standard that is called "Old English". Yet neither are they "Middle English"; moreover, as Treharne explains, for around three-quarters of this period, "there is barely any 'original' writing in English at all". These factors have led to a gap in scholarship, implying a discontinuity either side of the Norman Conquest, however this assumption is being challenged. At first sight, there would seem little to debate. Cnut appeared to have adopted wholeheartedly the traditional role of Anglo-Saxon kingship. Edward became king in , and given his upbringing might have been considered a Norman by those who lived across the English Channel. Following Cnut's reforms, excessive power was concentrated in the hands of the rival houses of Leofric of Mercia and Godwine of Wessex. Problems also came for Edward from the resentment caused by the king's introduction of Norman friends. A crisis arose in when Godwine defied the king's order to punish the men of Dover, who had resisted an attempt by Eustace of Boulogne to quarter his men on them by force. Godwine and his sons came back the following year with a strong force, and the magnates were not prepared to engage them in civil war but forced the king to make terms. Some unpopular Normans were driven out, including Archbishop Robert , whose archbishopric was given to Stigand ; this act supplied an excuse for the Papal support of William's cause. The fall of England and the Norman Conquest is a multi-generational, multi-family succession problem caused in great part by Athelred's incompetence. By the time William of Normandy, sensing an opportunity, landed his invading force in , the elite of Anglo-Saxon England had changed, although much of the culture and society had stayed the same. Michael's mass, and soon as his men were ready, they built a fortress at Hasting's port. This was told to King Harold, and he gathered then a great army and come towards them at the Hoary Apple Tree, and William came upon him unawares before his folk were ready. But the king nevertheless withstood him very strongly with fighting with those men who would follow him, and there was a great slaughter on either side. Then Harald the King was slain, and Leofwine the Earl, his brother, and Gyrth, and many good men, and the Frenchmen held the place of slaughter. Following the Norman conquest , many of the Anglo-Saxon nobility were either exiled or had joined the ranks of the peasantry. However, the survival of Anglo-Saxon heiresses was significantly greater. Many of the next generation of the nobility had English mothers and learnt to speak English at home. The chronicler Orderic Vitalis , who was the product of an Anglo-Norman marriage, writes: "And so the English groaned aloud for their lost liberty and plotted ceaselessly to find some way of shaking off a yoke that was so intolerable and unaccustomed". Many Anglo-Saxon people needed to learn Norman French to communicate with their rulers, but it is clear that among themselves they kept speaking Old English, which meant that England was in an interesting tri-lingual situation: Anglo-Saxon for the common people, Latin for the Church, and Norman French for the administrators, the nobility, and the law courts. In this time, and because of the cultural shock of the Conquest, Anglo-Saxon began to change very rapidly, and by or so, it was no longer Anglo-Saxon English, but what scholars call early Middle English. Research has shown that a form of Anglo-Saxon was still being spoken, and not merely among uneducated peasants, into the thirteenth century in the West Midlands. Tolkien 's major scholarly discovery when he studied a group of texts written in early Middle English called the Katherine Group , because they include the Life of St. Katherine also, the Life of St. Margaret, the Life and the Passion of St. Juliana, Ancrene Wisse, and Hali Meithhad—these last two teaching how to be a good anchoress and arguing for the goodness of virginity. Old English had been a central mark of the Anglo-Saxon cultural identity. With the passing of time, however, and particularly following the Norman conquest of England, this language changed significantly, and although some people for example the scribe known as the Tremulous Hand of Worcester could still read Old English into the thirteenth century, it fell out of use and the texts became useless. The Exeter Book , for example, seems to have been used to press gold leaf and at one point had a pot of fish- based glue sitting on top of it. For Michael Drout this symbolises the end of the Anglo-Saxons. The larger narrative, seen in the history of Anglo-Saxon England, is the continued mixing and integration of various disparate elements into one Anglo-Saxon people.
Recommended publications
  • The Anglo-Saxon Period of English Law
    THE ANGLO-SAXON PERIOD OF ENGLISH LAW We find the proper starting point for the history of English law in what are known as Anglo-Saxon times. Not only does there seem to be no proof, or evidence of the existence of any Celtic element in any appreciable measure in our law, but also, notwithstanding the fact that the Roman occupation of Britain had lasted some four hundred years when it terminated in A. D. 410, the last word of scholarship does not bring to light any trace of the law of Imperial Rome, as distinct from the precepts and traditions of the Roman Church, in the earliest Anglo- Saxon documents. That the written dooms of our kings are the purest specimen of pure Germanic law, has been the verdict of one scholar after another. Professor Maitland tells us that: "The Anglo-Saxon laws that have come down to us (and we have no reason to fear the loss of much beyond some dooms of the Mercian Offa) are best studied as members of a large Teutonic family. Those that proceed from the Kent and Wessex of the seventh century are closely related to the Continental folk-laws. Their next of kin seem to be the Lex Saxonum and the laws of the Lom- bards."1 Whatever is Roman in them is ecclesiastical, the system which in course of time was organized as the Canon law. Nor are there in England any traces of any Romani who are being suffered to live under their own law by their Teutonic rulers.
    [Show full text]
  • Answer in Full Sentences Title: William's Government Changes
    Title: William’s government changes Who was Lanfranc? (1 Describe two changes of What was forfeiture? (1 point) the feudal system (2 point) points) What was demesne? (2 How did William change What was knight points) life in Norman England? service? (1 point) (3 points, 1 per change) What was homage? (1 How did William reduce How did William point) the role of the earls? (2 Normanise the church? points) (3 points) How many points can you get? Answer in full sentences Title: How did William use the government to increase his own power? How does the Rule of law, role of the individual government liberty compare today? Learning Objectives -Describe the changes William made to the government. -Explain why William reduced the role of the Earls and used regents. -Assess the importance of the office of the sheriff and the demesne. Granted land and tax concessions William I Provided peace, law, protection in Knight service according to set quote return for loyalty and service Tax (and reliefs) Justice (baronial courts) Tenants-in-chief (Lords, bishops and abbots) Granted land and other privileges Military service in return for land Tax (and reliefs) Under-tenants Justice (manorial courts) (Vassals) Land service (farming on vassal’s Provided land to be worked land)/ Rent Peasants (Some free men, but the majority were bound to one lord) Key terms: King (William I), Vassals, under-tenants, tenants-in-chief, peasants, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txA48AcJNmg&t=288s granted land, knight service, military service, land service, tax, justice https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUzRNp7OucQ Learning Objectives -Describe the changes William made to the government.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglo Saxon and Norman England Booklet— 1.1 Anglo-Saxon Society Anglo-Saxon Society 1.1
    Anglo Saxon and Norman England Booklet— 1.1 Anglo-Saxon Society Anglo-Saxon Society 1.1 Social System: Peasant Farmers Majority of Anglo-Saxons were peasant farmers. Peasants did a set amount of work for the local lord as well as work- ing the land to support themselves and their family. If they did not work for the lord the lord could take away their land. ‘Ceorls’ peasants were free to go work for another lord if they wanted to. Slaves 10% of Anglo-Saxons were slaves. Slaves could be bought and sold, and treated more like property than people. The Normans thought that owning slaves was barbaric, but it was a normal part of Anglo-Saxon life. Thegns Thegns were local lords, there were between 4,000 and 5000 Thegns. Thegns was an important man in the local community and lived in a manor house with a separate church. Task Colour in the pie chart to represent the so- cial structure of Anglo-Saxon England. Earls Earls were the most important men after the king. The relation- ship between the king and his earls was based on loyalty. The king trusted the earl more he would give him greater re- wards. However, sometimes the earls challenged the king to get more power. The Power of the English Monarchy The king’s role was to protect his people from attack and give them laws to maintain safety and security at home. In return, the people of England owed him service. Every boy swore an oath when he reached the age of 12 to be faithful to the king.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the River Wear-Part 1
    Armchair Adventurers Explore The River Wear G eog rap Part 1 from the Pennines to the outskirts of Durham hy A period. On the sea bed a limy ooze full of the rch y aeo eolog log G decaying skeletons of sea creatures built up. y Rivers washed down sand and gravel building His up deltas, and forests flourished on the deltas tory and swampy margins. Periodically the seas rose, drowned the deltas and forests and more Geology ooze was deposited; then sea levels dropped The River Wear rises in the North Pennines and and the deltas and forests returned. This cycle flows in an easterly direction to empty in the with compression gave rise to sedimentary North Sea at Sunderland. Weardale is in an rocks. The oozes became limestone, the sands, gravels and muds became shale and sandstone, and the forests became coal. Limestone and sandstone are resistant to erosion, whereas the softer shales wear away more easily. This contrast has produced the terraced hillsides which are characteristic of the whole area and the hard limestone outcrops form waterfalls created by the erosion. area designated for it’s Outstanding Natural Beauty. It is also a UNESCO Global Geopark. A Geopark is a place of outstanding geological heritage which is used to support sustainable development through conservation, education, interpretation and nature tourism. High Force Waterfall Limestone is the dominant rock in Upper The landscape has evolved over 500 million Weardale. Its main constituent, calcium years. During that time the valley has been carbonate, is soluble in rainwater which is liquid molten rock, desert,tropical sea,swamps, acidic and has eroded it to form sink holes, and an ice sheet.
    [Show full text]
  • The Posse Comitatus and the Office of Sheriff: Armed Citizens Summoned to the Aid of Law Enforcement
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 104 Article 3 Issue 4 Symposium On Guns In America Fall 2015 The oP sse Comitatus And The Office Of Sheriff: Armed Citizens Summoned To The Aid Of Law Enforcement David B. Kopel Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons Recommended Citation David B. Kopel, The Posse Comitatus And The Office Of erSh iff: Armed Citizens Summoned To The Aid Of Law Enforcement, 104 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 761 (2015). https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc/vol104/iss4/3 This Criminal Law is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/15/10404-0761 THE JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 104, No. 4 Copyright © 2015 by Northwestern University School of Law Printed in U.S.A. THE POSSE COMITATUS AND THE OFFICE OF SHERIFF: ARMED CITIZENS SUMMONED TO THE AID OF LAW ENFORCEMENT DAVID B. KOPEL* Posse comitatus is the legal power of sheriffs and other officials to summon armed citizens to aid in keeping the peace. The posse comitatus can be traced back at least as far as the reign of Alfred the Great in ninth- century England. The institution thrives today in the United States; a study of Colorado finds many county sheriffs have active posses. Like the law of the posse comitatus, the law of the office of sheriff has been remarkably stable for over a millennium.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglo – Saxon Society
    ABSTRACT This booklet will enable you to revise the key aspects of Paper 2 Anglo – Saxon England, some of which you may remember from year 9. After you have completed this booklet, there will be some more to revise Anglo – Saxon England before we move onto Norman England from 1066. Ms Marsh ANGLO – SAXON SOCIETY GCSE History Paper 2 How did Anglo – Saxon kings demonstrate their power? L.O: Explain key features of Anglo – Saxon kings 1. Which last Anglo – Saxon king ruled between 1042 - 1066? 2. Which people were the biggest threat to the Anglo – Saxons? 3. Who was at the top of Anglo – Saxon society? (Answers at the end of the booklet) Recap! The social hierarchy of Anglo – Saxon England meant that there were clear roles for everyone in society. The hierarchy was based on servitude – this meant that everyone had to do some sort of role to support the country. The king was the ultimate source of authority. This meant that all his decisions were final, partly due to the belief that God had chosen the king so any challenge to the king would be seen as a challenge to God. We call this belief anointed by God. Even though there were earldoms that were extremely powerful (see map below), most earls relied on the king to grant them their power and then maintain this power. Ultimately, the king could reduce the power of his earls or completely remove them. Edward the Confessor tried to do this in 1051, when he felt Earl Godwin had become too powerful – even though it ultimately failed, as Earl Godwin was allowed to regain his earldom, it demonstrates to us the huge power of the king.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anglo-Saxon and Norman "Eigenkirche" and the Ecclesiastical Policy of William I
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1981 The Anglo-Saxon and Norman "Eigenkirche" and the Ecclesiastical Policy of William I. Albert Simeon Cote Jr Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Cote, Albert Simeon Jr, "The Anglo-Saxon and Norman "Eigenkirche" and the Ecclesiastical Policy of William I." (1981). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 3675. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/3675 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “ Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy.
    [Show full text]
  • Address and Delivery in Anglo-Norman Royal Charters
    SHARPE 1 Charters and Charter Scholarship in Britain and Ireland, ed. M. T. Flanagan & J. A. Green (London: Palgrave, 2005), 32–52 [original page numbers in square brackets]. ADDRESS AND DELIVERY IN ANGLO-NORMAN ROYAL CHARTERS The writ is now widely recognized as an innovative diplomatic instrument, created in Anglo-Saxon England, developed by Anglo-Norman rulers, and by the end of the twelfth century influential elsewhere. Its essence is that it was delivered to a particular person or body responsible for the appropriate aspect of the administration of the realm or the doing of royal justice. In diplomatic terms, this is expressed in the address clause which is generally the vital clue to the way a document would be used and therefore to what it was meant to accomplish. There was an inherent linkage between the nature of the transaction, the person or body to whom it would be delivered, and the address clause. Who actually delivered the document would vary according to the nature of the business too, but the documents themselves do not spell out this step in the process: that must be inferred from understanding the relationship between address and function. The eleventh century appears to us now to be the key period in the evolution of the writ, though such a conclusion is bedevilled by issues of survival. All surviving pre-Conquest ‘writs’ are in fact what I should define more narrowly as ‘writ-charters’: that is, they are deliverable writs whose role was (or had developed into) that of charters. Anglo-Saxon writ-charters were addressed and delivered to the shire court, where they were publicly read before being returned to the beneficiary to keep for future use.
    [Show full text]
  • VOLUME I (—), 1822. `Donations to the Society', Archaeol. Aeliana, Ser
    VOLUME I (—), 1822. `Donations to the Society', Archaeol. Aeliana, ser. 1, I, 6 (—), 1833. `Runic gravestones found at Hartlepool', Gentleman's Mag., CIII, pt. 2, 218–20 (—), 1837. `Antiquities of Hexham abbey church', ibid., n. ser., VIII, 473–6 (—), 1838. `Sepulchral stones at Hartlepool', ibid., X, 536 (—), 1844. `Sepulchral stones found at Hartlepool', ibid., XXI, 187–8 (—), 1855a. `Donations to the Society', Archaeol. Aeliana, ser. 1, IV, 5 (—), 1855b. `Donations to the Society', ibid., 14 (—), 1855–7a. `Proceedings ..., 1855, no. 8', Proc. Soc. Antiq. Newcastle, ser. 1, I, 45–53 (—), 1855–7b. `Proceedings ..., 1856, no. 13', ibid., 89–107 (—), 1855–7c. `Proceedings ..., 1856, no. 14', ibid., 109–18 (—), 1855–7d. `Proceedings ..., 1856, no. 21', ibid., 179–85 (—), 1855–7e. `Proceedings ..., 1857, no. 30', ibid., 269–82 (—), 1860. `Exhibition 4th Jan. 1860', Archaeol. Aeliana, n. ser., IV, 254 (—), 1862–8a. `Meeting 18th May 1868', Trans. Architect. Archaeol. Soc. Durham Northumberland, I, xliv–vi (—), 1862–8b. `The church of St. Lawrence, Warkworth', ibid., 82–7 (—), 1862–8c. `St. Peter's, Monkwearmouth', ibid., 141–4 (—), 1862–8d. `Church reports, III: St. Peter's, Monkwearmouth', ibid., appendix, 1–8 (—), 1865a. `Chester-le-Street church', Archaeol. Aeliana, n. ser., VI, 188–9 (—), 1865b. `Runic legend from Monkwearmouth', ibid., 196 (—), 1865c. `Monthly Meeting 6th April 1864', ibid., 214 (—), 1869–79a. `Meetings 1868', Trans. Architect. Archaeol. Soc. Durham Northumberland, II, i–ii (—), 1869–79b. `Meeting 24th June 1869', ibid., v–vii (—), 1869–79c. `Meeting 28th–29th June 1869', ibid., vii–x (—), 1869–79d. `Meeting 4th Aug. 1871', ibid., xxx–xxxiv (—), 1869–79e. `Meeting 28th June 1872', ibid., xliv–xlvii (—), 1869–79f.
    [Show full text]
  • Mead-Halls of the Oiscingas: a New Kentish Perspective on the Anglo-Saxon Great Hall Complex Phenomenon
    Mead-halls of the Oiscingas: a new Kentish perspective on the Anglo-Saxon great hall complex phenomenon Article Published Version Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY) Open Access Thomas, G. (2018) Mead-halls of the Oiscingas: a new Kentish perspective on the Anglo-Saxon great hall complex phenomenon. Medieval Archaeology, 62 (2). pp. 262-303. ISSN 0076-6097 doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00766097.2018.1535386 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/76215/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . To link to this article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00766097.2018.1535386 Publisher: Maney Publishing All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online Medieval Archaeology ISSN: 0076-6097 (Print) 1745-817X (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ymed20 Mead-Halls of the Oiscingas: A New Kentish Perspective on the Anglo-Saxon Great Hall Complex Phenomenon GABOR THOMAS To cite this article: GABOR THOMAS (2018) Mead-Halls of the Oiscingas: A New Kentish Perspective on the Anglo-Saxon Great Hall Complex Phenomenon, Medieval Archaeology, 62:2, 262-303, DOI: 10.1080/00766097.2018.1535386 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00766097.2018.1535386 © 2018 The Author(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Etherley Moor 320 LK Developments Final Draft
    Planning Services COMMITTEE REPORT APPLICATION DETAILS APPLICATION NO: DM/16/03395/OUT Outline application for up to 320 residential units with all FULL APPLICATION DESCRIPTION: matters reserved except from access. NAME OF APPLICANT: LKA Developments Land East Of Wigdan Walls Road, Woodhouses ADDRESS: ELECTORAL DIVISION: West Auckland Steven Pilkington, Senior Planning Officer CASE OFFICER: 03000 263964 [email protected] DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE AND PROPOSALS The Site 1. The application site consists of a rectangular shaped parcel of agricultural land located to the edge of the existing residential development of Etherley Dene, to the west of Bishop Auckland. The site extends to approximately 15.2 ha in area and comprises greenfield land in an agricultural use, consisting of arable. The most southern portion of the site is relatively level however the site falls sharply to the north to Coal Burn representing a maximum 29m level change. 2. To the east of the application site the existing residential development of Rockingham Drive is located, separated by a semi mature hedgerow. To the south the adopted highway Greenfields Road is located, separated by mature hedgerow and hedge line trees. The dwellings of 1-9 Woodhouses, including the Bay Horse Public House and Woodhouses Farm House are located to the south western corner of the application site. The highway Wigdan Walls Road forms the western boundary, separated by a mature hedgerow. The Coal Burn is located to the north, beyond which lies open countryside where the land steadily rises. 3. A public right of way (Footpath No.12 (Bishop Auckland) is located adjacent to the east of the site however this has been unusable since the adjoining housing estate was built.
    [Show full text]
  • Judgement Under the Law of Wales
    05 Smith SC39 18/1/06 1:26 pm Page 63 STUDIA CELTICA, XXXIX (2005), 63–103 Judgement under the Law of Wales J. BEVERLEY SMITH Aberystwyth Tres diversi iudices sunt in Kambria secundum legem Howel Da: scilicet, iudex curie principalis per servitoriam, id est, swyt, cum rege semper de Dinewr vel Aberffraw; et unus solus iudex kymwd vel cantreff per swyt in qualibet curia de placitis in Gwynet et Powys; et iudex per dignitatem terre in qualibet curia kymwd vel cantref de Deheubarth, scilicet, quisque possessor terre. In its discussion of judges in Wales and the means by which judgements were given in court the text of Bodleian Rawlinson MS C821, Latin D, makes a distinction between three kinds of judges.1 The first was the judge (iudex) of each of the principal courts of Dinefwr and Aberffraw, who judged by virtue of office; second, there were judges (iudices) by virtue of office in the court of law of each commote or cantref in Gwynedd and Powys; and, third, there were judges (iudices) by privilege of land in each court of a commote or cantref in Deheubarth, namely every possessor of land.2 Judgements were distinguished in the same way, namely those of the king’s court, those of a judge by virtue of office in each commote or cantref in Gwynedd or Powys, and those of a judge not by virtue of office but by privilege of land in Deheubarth.3 The judge first identified in these passages, the judge of the court (ynad llys, brawdwr llys or iudex curie), looms large in the legal liter- ature as one of the principal officers of the king’s household, but the functions of his office, which have been examined elsewhere, stand apart from the subject matter of the present work and will not be noticed further.4 This study is concerned rather with the implications of the clear differentiation made in the text of Latin D between two species of judge and two forms of judgement that could be recognized in the courts of the princes’ territories, one associated with the courts of Gwynedd and Powys and the other with those of Deheubarth.
    [Show full text]