Mag Kron Print Pp 72-73

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mag Kron Print Pp 72-73 This chronology recalls key events in USAF’s quest for strategic “high ground.” 50 Years of Space and Compiled by the staff of Air Force Magazine Missiles Today’s Air Force space and missile Gen. Bernard A. Schriever professionals view July 1, 1954, as the red-letter date of their busi- ness—the moment that USAF fully and formally jumped into the space and missile field. Lt. Gen. Thomas S. Power, commander of Air Research and Development Command, ordered the creation in Inglewood, Calif., of the Western Development Division, headed by the now- legendary Brig. Gen. Bernard A. Schriever. WDD’s first job was to build strategic missiles for the Air Force, but such rockets could also launch Earth-circling satellites. Soon, WDD was building them, too, and forging the complex structure of modern military space power. In the 50 years that have elapsed, the Air Force has remained at the forefront of world strategic space systems, technologies, and operations. USAF Delta II launch Data on these pages are drawn from several official and nonofficial studies. The principal source is Air Force Space Command. 70 AIR FORCE Magazine / June 2004 erations of land-based ICBMs to the June 16, 1958. Boeing and Martin Air Force. are named prime contractors to de- Feb. 15, 1956. Responsibility for velop competitive designs for the Air the advanced satellite system WS 117L Force’s X-20 Dyna-Soar boost-glide (later, Satellite and Missile Observa- space vehicle. This project, although tion System, or SAMOS) is officially later canceled, is the first step toward transferred to WDD. producing a workable space shuttle. Oct. 29, 1956. Lockheed is awarded June 30, 1958. Pentagon notifies the prime contract for the develop- AFBMD that it has transferred to the ment of the Military Satellite System Advanced Research Projects Agency and its associated Hustler (later redes- (ARPA) authority to develop the Mili- ignated Agena) upper stage vehicle. tary Satellite System, WS 117L. March 1957. WDD begins feasi- July 29, 1958. President Dwight D. bility studies on a defense alarm sys- Eisenhower signs the National Aero- tem (MIDAS) satellite that would pro- nautics and Space Act. vide early warning of hostile missile Sept. 4, 1958. The Transit and launches. TIROS satellite programs are initiated June 1, 1957. WDD is redesignated with booster responsibilities assigned Air Force Ballistic Missile Division to AFBMD. Transit is a navigation (AFBMD). satellite, while TIROS (Television In- September 1957. US and Canada frared Observation Satellite) is to take create the North American Air De- television pictures of cloud cover and fense Command (NORAD) for defense transmit meteorological information for of air and space over the US and relay to ground stations. Canada. Nov. 25, 1958. AFBMD receives Oct. 4, 1957. Soviet Union stuns the its first specific NASA request to world with the launch of Sputnik, support research leading to manned world’s first man-made satellite, aboard spaceflight. An Atlas C booster is to one of their new SS-6 ICBMs. be the first of 13 ballistic missile boost- Nov. 13, 1957. Schriever directs ers to be procured for NASA. Air Force planning for development December 1958. ARDC assumes of man-carrying vehicle systems for space track mission for the Air Force. July 1, 1954. Air Research and space operation. Development Command establishes Nov. 29, 1957. Air Force Chief of the Western Development Division Staff Gen. Thomas D. White declares (WDD), in Inglewood, Calif., under the Air Force “must win the capability command of Brig. Gen. Bernard A. to control space.” Schriever. He is formally given full Dec. 17, 1957. The Air Force’s authority over the Atlas ICBM project. HGM-16 Atlas ICBM makes its first Sept. 8, 1954. The Air Force ap- successful launch and flight from Cape proves the WDD’s selection of the Canaveral. Ramo-Wooldridge Corp. to perform Jan. 31, 1958. The Army’s Ex- systems engineering and technical di- plorer 1, the first US satellite suc- rection functions for Project Atlas. cessfully sent into space, is launched Dec. 13, 1954. An Air Force pro- at Cape Canaveral. curement authorization sets aside $3.6 Feb. 10, 1958. A1C Donald G. million in production funding for At- Farrell, in a mock moon voyage, en- las. This is the first production fund- ters a cramped, windowless space cabin ing for an ICBM program. simulator at Randolph AFB, Tex., Jan. 6, 1955. USAF awards a con- where he spends a week under harsh tract to the Convair Division of Gen- physical and psychological conditions. eral Dynamics Corp., for development He emerges in good shape, convinc- and fabrication of the Atlas airframe ing space officials that humans are and control system, the integration indeed psychologically suited to ac- and assembly of the various subsystems tual spaceflight. with the airframe and control system, Feb. 27, 1958. Secretary of De- and for checkout and testing. fense Neil H. McElroy authorizes the Oct. 27, 1955. Glenn L. Martin Air- Air Force to start research and devel- craft Co. is given a contract authoriz- opment on a new ICBM. This is the ing the design, development, and test- genesis of Minuteman. ing of the two-stage Titan ICBM. March 31, 1958. Schriever directs Nov. 26, 1955. Secretary of De- planning for a full-scale manned mili- USAF’s X-20 Dyna-Soar boost-glide fense Charles E. Wilson assigns re- tary space systems program aimed at a space vehicle. This was the first step sponsibility for development and op- lunar landing operation. toward a usable space shuttle. AIR FORCE Magazine / June 2004 71 Dec. 18, 1958. Project Score, a lifts NASA’s Echo 1, the first passive communications repeater satellite, is communications satellite to be placed launched by an Atlas booster into Earth into orbit. orbit. The satellite on Dec. 19 broad- Aug. 18, 1960. Discoverer/Corona casts a Christmas message from Presi- satellite takes first image of Soviet dent Eisenhower to Earth, the first territory ever snapped from space. time a human voice has been relayed Aug. 19, 1960. Crew of a modified from space. C-119J uses two trailing wire hooks to Jan. 4, 1959. Vandenberg AFB, Ca- snag a descending Discoverer 14 cap- lif., and Pacific Missile Range are de- sule over the Pacific. It is the first clared operational for missile launchings. aerial recovery of an object returned Feb. 6, 1959. Air Force crew from orbit. launches the first XSM-68A (later re- Aug. 31, 1960. President Eisenhower designated HGM-25A) Titan ICBM shifts SAMOS program from Air Force from Cape Canaveral. into a small civilian-directed Pentagon Feb. 28, 1959. In test, USAF suc- office. This is the genesis of the Na- cessfully launches the Discoverer 1, tional Reconnaissance Office (NRO). the world’s first polar-orbiting satel- Sept. 15, 1960. DOD shifts its de- lite, from Vandenberg. It is part of the fense communications satellite program secret Corona program. to the Army and renames it Project April 2, 1959. NASA announces Advent. the identities of seven Project Mer- Sept. 23, 1960. ARDC recommends cury astronauts: USAF Capts. L. splitting USAF’s Los Angeles R&D Gordon Cooper Jr., Virgil I. “Gus” complex. Plan calls for keeping space Grissom, and Donald K. “Deke” activities in Los Angeles and moving Slayton, Navy Lt. Cmdrs. Walter M. missile activities to Norton AFB, Calif. Schirra Jr. and Alan B. Shepard Jr., October 1960. NORAD assumes Navy Lt. M. Scott Carpenter, and operational control of all space defense Marine Lt. Col. John H. Glenn Jr. An Atlas booster fitted with a communications repeater satellite responsibilities with formation of the April 6, 1959. The first military waits on the pad at Patrick AFB, Fla. Space Detection and Tracking System. unit to be charged with conducting Feb. 1, 1961. First LGM-30A Min- military satellite operations, USAF’s uteman ICBM is test launched from 6594th Test Wing, is established at Oct. 6, 1959. AFBMD issues an Palo Alto, Calif. abbreviated development plan for Vela April 13, 1959. Air Force Thor/ Hotel system to detect and locate Agena A boosts into orbit the Discov- nuclear detonations in space. erer 2 satellite, the first satellite to be April 1, 1960. US launches TIROS stabilized in orbit in all three axes, to 1, world’s first meteorological satel- be maneuvered on command from lite, from Cape Canaveral. Earth, to separate a re-entry vehicle on April 13, 1960. Transit 1B be- command, and to send its re-entry ve- comes first US navigation satellite hicle back to Earth. in space. Aug. 7, 1959. US carries out first May 20, 1960. Air Force Atlas satellite intercontinental relay of a ICBM, launched from Cape Canaveral, voice message. boosts a 1.5-ton payload 9,040 miles Aug. 7, 1959. Explorer 6 spacecraft to the Indian Ocean, the longest-ever transmits first television pictures from flight for a US ICBM. space. May 24, 1960. MIDAS 2 becomes Aug. 31, 1959. Strategic Air Com- the first early warning satellite in or- mand (SAC) takes command of Van- bit. denberg’s Complex 576A, USAF’s June 22, 1960. US launches Ga- first fully operational ICBM complex. lactic Radiation and Background Sept. 9, 1959. SAC crew at Van- (GRAB) satellite, the nation’s first denberg conducts first West Coast successful reconnaissance spacecraft. launch of an operational Atlas missile, It collects electronic intelligence which lands near Wake Island. (Elint) from Soviet air defense ra- Sept. 18, 1959. USAF states that dars. the Pentagon has approved the trans- Aug. 11, 1960. Discoverer 13 satel- fer of MIDAS and SAMOS back to the lite, launched on Aug. 10, ejects a Air Force.
Recommended publications
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 29 January 2001
    United Nations A/AC.105/751/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 29 January 2001 Original: English Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space National research on space debris, safety of space objects with nuclear power sources on board and problems of their collisions with space debris Note by the Secretariat* Addendum Contents Chapter Paragraphs Page I. Introduction........................................................... 1-2 2 Replies received from Member States and international organizations .................... 2 United States of America ......................................................... 2 European Space Agency.......................................................... 7 __________________ * The present document contains replies received from Member States and international organizations between 25 November 2000 and 25 January 2001. V.01-80520 (E) 020201 050201 A/AC.105/751/Add.1 I. Introduction 1. At its forty-third session, the Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space agreed that Member States should continue to be invited to report to the Secretary- General on a regular basis with regard to national and international research concerning the safety of space objects with nuclear power sources, that further studies should be conducted on the issue of collision of orbiting space objects with nuclear power sources on board with space debris and that the Committee’s Scientific and Technical Subcommittee should be kept informed of the results of such studies.1 The Committee also took note of the agreement of the Subcommittee that national research on space debris should continue and that Member States and international organizations should make available to all interested parties the results of that research, including information on practices adopted that had proved effective in minimizing the creation of space debris (A/AC.105/736, para.
    [Show full text]
  • AIRLIFT RODEO a Brief History of Airlift Competitions, 1961-1989
    "- - ·· - - ( AIRLIFT RODEO A Brief History of Airlift Competitions, 1961-1989 Office of MAC History Monograph by JefferyS. Underwood Military Airlift Command United States Air Force Scott Air Force Base, Illinois March 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword . iii Introduction . 1 CARP Rodeo: First Airdrop Competitions .............. 1 New Airplanes, New Competitions ....... .. .. ... ... 10 Return of the Rodeo . 16 A New Name and a New Orientation ..... ........... 24 The Future of AIRLIFT RODEO . ... .. .. ..... .. .... 25 Appendix I .. .... ................. .. .. .. ... ... 27 Appendix II ... ...... ........... .. ..... ..... .. 28 Appendix III .. .. ................... ... .. 29 ii FOREWORD Not long after the Military Air Transport Service received its air­ drop mission in the mid-1950s, MATS senior commanders speculated that the importance of the new airdrop mission might be enhanced through a tactical training competition conducted on a recurring basis. Their idea came to fruition in 1962 when MATS held its first airdrop training competition. For the next several years the competition remained an annual event, but it fell by the wayside during the years of the United States' most intense participation in the Southeast Asia conflict. The airdrop competitions were reinstated in 1969 but were halted again in 1973, because of budget cuts and the reduced emphasis being given to airdrop operations. However, the esprit de corps engendered among the troops and the training benefits derived from the earlier events were not forgotten and prompted the competition's renewal in 1979 in its present form. Since 1979 the Rodeos have remained an important training event and tactical evaluation exercise for the Military Airlift Command. The following historical study deals with the origins, evolution, and results of the tactical airlift competitions in MATS and MAC.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Summaries
    TIROS 8 12/21/63 Delta-22 TIROS-H (A-53) 17B S National Aeronautics and TIROS 9 1/22/65 Delta-28 TIROS-I (A-54) 17A S Space Administration TIROS Operational 2TIROS 10 7/1/65 Delta-32 OT-1 17B S John F. Kennedy Space Center 2ESSA 1 2/3/66 Delta-36 OT-3 (TOS) 17A S Information Summaries 2 2 ESSA 2 2/28/66 Delta-37 OT-2 (TOS) 17B S 2ESSA 3 10/2/66 2Delta-41 TOS-A 1SLC-2E S PMS 031 (KSC) OSO (Orbiting Solar Observatories) Lunar and Planetary 2ESSA 4 1/26/67 2Delta-45 TOS-B 1SLC-2E S June 1999 OSO 1 3/7/62 Delta-8 OSO-A (S-16) 17A S 2ESSA 5 4/20/67 2Delta-48 TOS-C 1SLC-2E S OSO 2 2/3/65 Delta-29 OSO-B2 (S-17) 17B S Mission Launch Launch Payload Launch 2ESSA 6 11/10/67 2Delta-54 TOS-D 1SLC-2E S OSO 8/25/65 Delta-33 OSO-C 17B U Name Date Vehicle Code Pad Results 2ESSA 7 8/16/68 2Delta-58 TOS-E 1SLC-2E S OSO 3 3/8/67 Delta-46 OSO-E1 17A S 2ESSA 8 12/15/68 2Delta-62 TOS-F 1SLC-2E S OSO 4 10/18/67 Delta-53 OSO-D 17B S PIONEER (Lunar) 2ESSA 9 2/26/69 2Delta-67 TOS-G 17B S OSO 5 1/22/69 Delta-64 OSO-F 17B S Pioneer 1 10/11/58 Thor-Able-1 –– 17A U Major NASA 2 1 OSO 6/PAC 8/9/69 Delta-72 OSO-G/PAC 17A S Pioneer 2 11/8/58 Thor-Able-2 –– 17A U IMPROVED TIROS OPERATIONAL 2 1 OSO 7/TETR 3 9/29/71 Delta-85 OSO-H/TETR-D 17A S Pioneer 3 12/6/58 Juno II AM-11 –– 5 U 3ITOS 1/OSCAR 5 1/23/70 2Delta-76 1TIROS-M/OSCAR 1SLC-2W S 2 OSO 8 6/21/75 Delta-112 OSO-1 17B S Pioneer 4 3/3/59 Juno II AM-14 –– 5 S 3NOAA 1 12/11/70 2Delta-81 ITOS-A 1SLC-2W S Launches Pioneer 11/26/59 Atlas-Able-1 –– 14 U 3ITOS 10/21/71 2Delta-86 ITOS-B 1SLC-2E U OGO (Orbiting Geophysical
    [Show full text]
  • This Boeing Team's Skills at Producing Delta IV Rocket Fairings Helped
    t’s usually the tail end of the rocket that gets all the early atten- other work. But they’d jump at the chance to work together again. tion, providing an impressive fiery display as the spacecraft is Their story is one of challenges and solutions. And they attribute hurled into orbit. But mission success also depends on what’s their success to Lean+ practices and good old-fashioned teamwork. Ion top of the rocket: a piece of metal called the payload fairing “The team took it upon themselves to make an excellent that protects the rocket’s cargo during the sometimes brutal ride product,” said program manager Thomas Fung. “We had parts to orbital speed. issues and tool problems, but the guys really stepped up and took “There’s no room for error,” said Tracy Allen, Boeing’s manu- pride and worked through the issues.” facturing production manager for a Huntington Beach, Calif., team The aluminum fairing team went through a major transition that made fairings for the Delta IV. The fairing not only protects the when Boeing merged its Delta Program with Lockheed Martin’s payload from launch to orbit but also must jettison properly for Atlas Program to form United Launch Alliance in 2006. deployment of the satellite or spacecraft. “There were a lot of process changes in the transition phase Allen and his colleagues built the 65-foot-long (20-meter-long) because we were working with a new company,” Fung said. “We aluminum isogrid fairings for the Delta IV heavy-lift launch vehicle. had part shortages because of vendor issues, and that caused The design was based on 41 similar fairings Boeing made for the an impact to the schedule.
    [Show full text]
  • L AUNCH SYSTEMS Databk7 Collected.Book Page 18 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM Databk7 Collected.Book Page 19 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM
    databk7_collected.book Page 17 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM CHAPTER TWO L AUNCH SYSTEMS databk7_collected.book Page 18 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM databk7_collected.book Page 19 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM CHAPTER TWO L AUNCH SYSTEMS Introduction Launch systems provide access to space, necessary for the majority of NASA’s activities. During the decade from 1989–1998, NASA used two types of launch systems, one consisting of several families of expendable launch vehicles (ELV) and the second consisting of the world’s only partially reusable launch system—the Space Shuttle. A significant challenge NASA faced during the decade was the development of technologies needed to design and implement a new reusable launch system that would prove less expensive than the Shuttle. Although some attempts seemed promising, none succeeded. This chapter addresses most subjects relating to access to space and space transportation. It discusses and describes ELVs, the Space Shuttle in its launch vehicle function, and NASA’s attempts to develop new launch systems. Tables relating to each launch vehicle’s characteristics are included. The other functions of the Space Shuttle—as a scientific laboratory, staging area for repair missions, and a prime element of the Space Station program—are discussed in the next chapter, Human Spaceflight. This chapter also provides a brief review of launch systems in the past decade, an overview of policy relating to launch systems, a summary of the management of NASA’s launch systems programs, and tables of funding data. The Last Decade Reviewed (1979–1988) From 1979 through 1988, NASA used families of ELVs that had seen service during the previous decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory Numbers Are Total Active Inventory figures As of Sept
    Gallery of USAF Weapons Note: Inventory numbers are total active inventory figures as of Sept. 30, 2014. By Aaron M. U. Church, Associate Editor I 2015 USAF Almanac BOMBER AIRCRAFT flight controls actuate trailing edge surfaces that combine aileron, elevator, and rudder functions. New EHF satcom and high-speed computer upgrade B-1 Lancer recently entered full production. Both are part of the Defensive Management Brief: A long-range bomber capable of penetrating enemy defenses and System-Modernization (DMS-M). Efforts are underway to develop a new VLF delivering the largest weapon load of any aircraft in the inventory. receiver for alternative comms. Weapons integration includes the improved COMMENTARY GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator and JASSM-ER and future weapons The B-1A was initially proposed as replacement for the B-52, and four pro- such as GBU-53 SDB II, GBU-56 Laser JDAM, JDAM-5000, and LRSO. Flex- totypes were developed and tested in 1970s before program cancellation in ible Strike Package mods will feed GPS data to the weapons bays to allow 1977. The program was revived in 1981 as B-1B. The vastly upgraded aircraft weapons to be guided before release, to thwart jamming. It also will move added 74,000 lb of usable payload, improved radar, and reduced radar cross stores management to a new integrated processor. Phase 2 will allow nuclear section, but cut maximum speed to Mach 1.2. The B-1B first saw combat in and conventional weapons to be carried simultaneously to increase flexibility. Iraq during Desert Fox in December 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas Launch System Mission Planner's Guide, Atlas V Addendum
    ATLAS Atlas Launch System Mission Planner’s Guide, Atlas V Addendum FOREWORD This Atlas V Addendum supplements the current version of the Atlas Launch System Mission Plan- ner’s Guide (AMPG) and presents the initial vehicle capabilities for the newly available Atlas V launch system. Atlas V’s multiple vehicle configurations and performance levels can provide the optimum match for a range of customer requirements at the lowest cost. The performance data are presented in sufficient detail for preliminary assessment of the Atlas V vehicle family for your missions. This guide, in combination with the AMPG, includes essential technical and programmatic data for preliminary mission planning and spacecraft design. Interface data are in sufficient detail to assess a first-order compatibility. This guide contains current information on Lockheed Martin’s plans for Atlas V launch services. It is subject to change as Atlas V development progresses, and will be revised peri- odically. Potential users of Atlas V launch service are encouraged to contact the offices listed below to obtain the latest technical and program status information for the Atlas V development. For technical and business development inquiries, contact: COMMERCIAL BUSINESS U.S. GOVERNMENT INQUIRIES BUSINESS INQUIRIES Telephone: (691) 645-6400 Telephone: (303) 977-5250 Fax: (619) 645-6500 Fax: (303) 971-2472 Postal Address: Postal Address: International Launch Services, Inc. Commercial Launch Services, Inc. P.O. Box 124670 P.O. Box 179 San Diego, CA 92112-4670 Denver, CO 80201 Street Address: Street Address: International Launch Services, Inc. Commercial Launch Services, Inc. 101 West Broadway P.O. Box 179 Suite 2000 MS DC1400 San Diego, CA 92101 12999 Deer Creek Canyon Road Littleton, CO 80127-5146 A current version of this document can be found, in electronic form, on the Internet at: http://www.ilslaunch.com ii ATLAS LAUNCH SYSTEM MISSION PLANNER’S GUIDE ATLAS V ADDENDUM (AVMPG) REVISIONS Revision Date Rev No.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Acquisition Cost by Weapon System Major Weapon Systems OVERVIEW
    The estimated cost of this report or study for the Department of Defense is approximately $32,000 for the 2017 Fiscal Year. This includes $13,000 in expenses and $19,000 in DoD labor. Generated on 2017May03 RefID: E-7DE12B0 FY 2018 Program Acquisition Cost by Weapon System Major Weapon Systems OVERVIEW The combined capabilities and performance of United States (U.S.) weapon systems are unmatched throughout the world, ensuring that U.S. military forces have the advantage over any adversary. The Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 acquisition funding request for the Department of Defense (DoD) budget totals $208.6 billion, which includes base funding and Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) funding; $125.2 billion for Procurement funded programs and $83.3 billion for Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E) funded programs. Of the $208.6 billion, $94.9 billion is for programs that have been designated as Major Defense Acquisition Programs (MDAPs). This book focuses on all funding for the key MDAP programs. To simplify the display of the various weapon systems, this book is organized by the following mission area categories: Mission Area Categories • Aircraft & Related Systems • Missiles and Munitions • Command, Control, Communications, • Mission Support Activities Computers, and Intelligence (C4I) Systems • RDT&E Science & Technology • Ground Systems • Shipbuilding and Maritime Systems • Missile Defense Programs • Space Based Systems FY 2018 Modernization – Total: $208.6 Billion ($ in Billions) Space Based Aircraft & Systems Related $9.8
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Truth: Corona Landmarks Ground Truth: Corona Landmarks an Introduction
    CULTURAL An Exhibition by Julie Anand PROGRAMS OF and Damon Sauer THE NATIONAL Sept. 24, 2018 – Feb. 22, 2019 ACADEMY OF NAS Building, Upstairs Gallery SCIENCES 2101 Constitution Ave., N.W. Ground Truth: Corona Landmarks Ground Truth: Corona Landmarks An Introduction In this series of images of what remains of the Corona project, Julie Anand and Damon Sauer investigate our relationship to the vast networks of information that encircle the globe. The Corona project was a CIA and U.S. Air Force surveillance initiative that began in 1959 and ended in 1972. It involved using cameras on satellites to take aerial photographs of the Soviet Union and China. The cameras were calibrated with concrete targets on the ground that are 60 feet in diameter, which provided a reference for scale and ensured images were in focus. Approximately 273 of these concrete targets were placed on a 16-square-mile grid in the Arizona des- ert, spaced a mile apart. Long after Corona’s end and its declassification in 1995, around 180 remain, and Anand and Sauer have spent three years photographing them as part of an ongoing project. In their images, each concrete target is overpowered by an expansive sky, onto which the artists map the paths of orbiting satellites that were present at the Calibration Mark AG49 with Satellites moment the photograph was taken. For Anand and 2016 Sauer, “these markers of space have become archival pigment print markers of time, representing a poignant moment 55 x 44 inches in geopolitical and technologic social history.” A few of the calibration markers like this one are made primarily of rock rather than concrete.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Weapons Earth Wars
    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that EDUCATION AND THE ARTS helps improve policy and decisionmaking through ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT research and analysis. HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from INFRASTRUCTURE AND www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND TRANSPORTATION Corporation. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND Purchase this document TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Browse Reports & Bookstore Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Project AIR FORCE View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. The monograph/report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph/reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces. SpaceSpace WeaponsWeapons EarthEarth WarsWars Bob Preston | Dana J. Johnson | Sean J.A. Edwards Michael Miller | Calvin Shipbaugh Project AIR FORCE R Prepared for the United States Air Force Approved for public release; distribution unlimited The research reported here was sponsored by the United States Air Force under Contract F49642-01-C-0003.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Almanac 2007
    2007 Space Almanac The US military space operation in facts and figures. Compiled by Tamar A. Mehuron, Associate Editor, and the staff of Air Force Magazine 74 AIR FORCE Magazine / August 2007 Space 0.05g 60,000 miles Geosynchronous Earth Orbit 22,300 miles Hard vacuum 1,000 miles Medium Earth Orbit begins 300 miles 0.95g 100 miles Low Earth Orbit begins 60 miles Astronaut wings awarded 50 miles Limit for ramjet engines 28 miles Limit for turbojet engines 20 miles Stratosphere begins 10 miles Illustration not to scale Artist’s conception by Erik Simonsen AIR FORCE Magazine / August 2007 75 US Military Missions in Space Space Support Space Force Enhancement Space Control Space Force Application Launch of satellites and other Provide satellite communica- Ensure freedom of action in space Provide capabilities for the ap- high-value payloads into space tions, navigation, weather infor- for the US and its allies and, plication of combat operations and operation of those satellites mation, missile warning, com- when directed, deny an adversary in, through, and from space to through a worldwide network of mand and control, and intel- freedom of action in space. influence the course and outcome ground stations. ligence to the warfighter. of conflict. US Space Funding Millions of constant Fiscal 2007 dollars 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 Fiscal Year 59 62 65 68 71 74 77 80 83 86 89 92 95 98 01 04 Fiscal Year NASA DOD Other Total Fiscal Year NASA DOD Other Total 1959 1,841 3,457 240 5,538 1983 13,051 18,601 675 32,327 1960 3,205 3,892
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Apollo 15: “The Problem We Brought Back from the Moon”
    Appendix A Apollo 15: “The Problem We Brought Back From the Moon” Postal Covers Carried on Apollo 151 Among the best known collectables from the Apollo Era are the covers flown onboard the Apollo 15 mission in 1971, mainly because of what the mission’s Lunar Module Pilot, Jim Irwin, called “the problem we brought back from the Moon.” [1] The crew of Apollo 15 carried out one of the most complete scientific explorations of the Moon and accomplished several firsts, including the first lunar roving vehicle that was operated on the Moon to extend the range of exploration. Some 81 kilograms (180 pounds) of lunar surface samples were returned for anal- ysis, and a battery of very productive lunar surface and orbital experiments were conducted, including the first EVA in deep space. [2] Yet the Apollo 15 crew are best remembered for carrying envelopes to the Moon, and the mission is remem- bered for the “great postal caper.” [3] As noted in Chapter 7, Apollo 15 was not the first mission to carry covers. Dozens were carried on each flight from Apollo 11 onwards (see Table 1 for the complete list) and, as Apollo 15 Commander Dave Scott recalled in his book, the whole business had probably been building since Mercury, through Gemini and into Apollo. [4] People had a fascination with objects that had been carried into space, and that became more and more popular – and valuable – as the programs progressed. Right from the start of the Mercury program, each astronaut had been allowed to carry a certain number of personal items onboard, with NASA’s permission, in 1 A first version of this material was issued as Apollo 15 Cover Scandal in Orbit No.
    [Show full text]