DOCSLIB.ORG

INTRODUCTION to PALEOBIOLOGY and the FOSSIL RECORD in Oxygen Levels in the Deep Ocean (Canfi Eld Et Al

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
INTRODUCTION to PALEOBIOLOGY and the FOSSIL RECORD in Oxygen Levels in the Deep Ocean (Canfi Eld Et Al Chapter 10 Origin of the metazoans Key points • Relatively few basic body plans have appeared in the fossil record; most animals have a triploblastic architecture, with three fundamental body layers. • Molecular data show there are three main groupings of animals: the deuterostomes (echinoderm–hemichordate–chordate group), the spiralians (mollusk–annelid– brachiopod–bryozoans–most fl atworms–rotifers (platyzoans) group) and the ecdysozo- ans (arthropod–nematode–priapulid plus other taxa group). Together, the spiralians and ecdysozoans are usually called the protostomes. • Five lines of evidence (body fossils, trace fossils, fossil embryos, the molecular clock and biomarkers) suggest that the metazoans had originated prior to the Ediacaran, 600 Ma. • Snowball Earth by coincidence or design was a pivotal event in metazoan history; bila- terians evolved after the Marinoan glaciation. • The fi rst metazoans were probably similar to the demosponges, occurring fi rst before the Ediacaran. • The Ediacaran biota was a soft-bodied assemblage of organisms largely of uncertain affi nities, reaching its acme during the Late Proterozoic, which may represent the earliest ecosystem dominated by large, multicellular organisms. • The Tommotian or small shelly fauna was the fi rst skeletalized assemblage of metazoans; this association of Early Cambrian microfossils contains a variety of phyla with shells or sclerites mainly composed of phosphatic material. • The Cambrian explosion generated a range of new body plans during a relatively short time interval. • The Ordovician radiation was marked by accelerations in diversifi cation at the family, genus and species levels together with increased complexity in marine communities. Consequently, if my theory be true, it is indisputable that before the lowest Silurian [Cambrian of modern usage] stratum was deposited, long periods elapsed, as long as, or probably far longer than, the whole interval from the Silurian age to the present day; and that during these vast, yet quite unknown, periods of time, the world swarmed with living creatures. Charles Darwin (1859) On the Origin of Species ORIGIN OF THE METAZOANS 235 ORIGINS AND CLASSIFICATION The fi rst metazoans: when and what? When did the fi rst complex animals, the meta- Life on our planet has been evolving for nearly zoans, appear on Earth and what did they 4 billion years. Molecular data suggest meta- look like? How could complex, multicelled zoans have probably been around for at least animals evolve from the undifferentiated 600 myr (Fig. 10.1), during which time, single-celled organisms of most of the Pre- according to some biologists, as many as 35 cambrian? Why did they take almost 4 separate phyla have evolved. Five lines of evi- billion years to appear? These questions have dence have fi gured prominently in the search puzzled scientists, including Charles Darwin, for the earliest metazoans: body fossils, trace for over two centuries. In the last few decades fossils, fossil embryos, the molecular clock a range of multidisciplinary techniques, from and biomarkers. molecular biology to X-ray tomography, has Much controversy still surrounds the timing helped generate new testable hypotheses of their origin. Was there a long cryptic inter- regarding the origins of our early ancestors. val of metazoan evolution prior to the Edia- Apart from the fossil evidence of metazoan caran – a time when we do not fi nd fossils body and trace fossils, the investigation of preserved, either because the animals lacked minute fossil embryos, carefully calibrated preservable bodies, or they were small, or molecular clocks and more recently biomark- perhaps a combination of both? Or, as the ers have placed the investigation of Precam- recalibrated molecular clocks suggest, can brian life at the top of many scientifi c animal origins be tracked back only to the agendas. Ediacaran, when there was also a sudden rise C Crinozoa 535 Eleutherozoa 200 metazoan orders Hemichordata metazoan classes C Pteriomorpha 604 molecular clock estimates C Nuculoida 160 C molecular clock calibration 579 C Vetigastropoda feeding larva 545 non-feeding larva Sorbeochoncha Oman biomarker record 549 493 Phyllodicida 120 Spionidea + Serpulidea 604 561 494 Hoplonemertea Heteronemertea 80 634 546 Arthropoda EcdysozoaPriapulida Spiralia Deuterostomia Number ofNumber classes/orders 543 Anthozoa 40 664 Hydrozoa Cnidaria Calcispongia Demospongia “Porifera” N-D T AB/T MMLateEarly Late Cryogenian Ediacaran Early Cambrian Ordovician 700 635 600 575 555 542 513 501 488 472 461 443 Ma Figure 10.1 Time scale and tempo of early animal evolution: the key metazoan groups are shown with the putative age of their last common ancestor, together with an estimate of the respective numbers of classes and orders indicated against a stratigraphy indicating key biological and chemical events. N–D, Nemakit-Daldynian; T, Tommotian; A, Atdabanian; B/T, Botomian. (Courtesy of Kevin Peterson.) 236 INTRODUCTION TO PALEOBIOLOGY AND THE FOSSIL RECORD in oxygen levels in the deep ocean (Canfi eld et al. 2007). Body fossil evidence Body fossils of basal metazoans in the Edia- caran Period are few and far between. The morphology of an early metazoan fossil must be clearly described and convincingly illus- trated, different organs and tissues identifi ed, and comparisons drawn with other extant and fossil organisms. Many Upper Precam- brian successions have been subjected to intense metamorphism and tectonism (see p. 48) and are now located in some of the Earth’s mountain belts. The chances of fi nding ade- Figure 10.2 Putative trace fossils from the quately preserved fossils are slight. Neverthe- Precambrian of Australia, showing less, the earliest undoubted metazoans occur Myxomitodes, a presumed trail of a mucus- within the widespread Ediacara biota (see p. producing multicellular organism about 1.8–2 242) dated at approximately 600–550 Ma. billion years old from Stirling Range, Western Moreover the fact that a relatively advanced Australia. (Photo is approximately 65 mm wide.) metazoan, the mollusk Kimberella, possibly (Courtesy of Stefan Bengtson.) equipped with a foot and radula (see p. 330), occurs within the Ediacara biota from south- trace fossils are from about 550 Ma (Droser ern Australia and Russia could suggest a et al. 2002) from northwest Russia, whereas history of metazoan evolution prior to the fecal strings have been reported from rocks Ediacaran. But although a strong case can be some 600 Ma (Brasier & McIlroy 1998) sug- made for a signifi cant Proterozoic record for gesting the existence of an ancient digestive the cnidarians and sponges and perhaps some system. In fact no convincing trace fossils are other metazoans, the Cambrian explosion still known from successions older than the Mari- marks the arrival, center stage, of the bilateri- noan glaciation (635 Ma), the second main ans (Budd 2008). icehouse event associated with snowball Earth (see p. 112). Trace fossil evidence Embryo fossil evidence Trace fossils are the behavior of organisms recorded in the sediment (see p. 510). By their Fossil Neoproterozoic embryos are now very nature they occur in place and thus known from a number of localities, although cannot be transported or reworked by cur- claims that they represent sulfur-oxidizing rents. Nevertheless these too must be convinc- bacteria or that they are not embryos at all ingly demonstrated as biogenic and the age of have their advocates. Some of the best studied their enclosing sediments accurately deter- examples are from the Doushantuo Forma- mined. If and when metazoans developed tion, South China. The part of the formation locomotory organs, such as the molluskan yielding the embryos was fi rst dated at approx- foot, and digestive systems, we might expect imately 580 Ma, predating much of the Edia- to fi nd burrows and trails together with fecal caran but postdating the Marinoan glaciation. pellets. Records of trace fossils from rocks Revised dates seem to suggest that the faunas older than 1 Ga in India (Seilacher et al. 1998) are younger and that they overlap with the and over 1.2 Ga in the Stirling biota of Aus- older Ediacaran assemblages. Cell division tralia (Rasmussen et al. 2002) generated and cleavage patterns are obvious although it considerable excitement (Fig. 10.2). Both is diffi cult to assign the material to distinct suggested metazoan life older than 1 Ga but metazoan groups in the absence of juvenile both are now considered questionable (Jensen and adult forms. There are, however, a lack 2003). The oldest undoubted locomotory of epithelia even in clusters of over 1000 cells ORIGIN OF THE METAZOANS 237 suggesting that the embryos examined are sial. For example, the last common ancestor those, at best, of stem-group metazoans of the bilaterians, the metazoan clade exclud- (Hagadorn et al. 2006); they could equally ing the sponges and cnidarians, has been vari- well be fungi or rangeomorphs (enigmatic ously placed at anywhere between 900 and frond-like fossils). Nonetheless the Doushan- 570 Ma. Why is there such a spread of ages tuo embryos, although unplaced taxonomi- in a seemingly exact science? The rates of cally, provide our earliest body fossil evidence molecular evolution in various groups are for probable metazoan life, albeit very basal, unfortunately not constant. The vertebrates and a fascinating insight into embryologic appear to have reduced their rates of molecu- processes in deep time (Donoghue 2007) lar change through time. So, using the slow (Box 10.1). vertebrate rates of molecular evolution to calibrate the date of origin of Bilateria gives dates that are too ancient (900 Ma). On the Molecular evidence other hand, using mean bilaterian rates of molecular evolution gives a date (570 Ma) Not only have the morphologies of organisms that is more in keeping with evidence from evolved with time, but so too have their mol- the fossil record (e.g. Budd & Jensen 2000) ecules. This forms the basis of the concept of and thus makes the Cambrian explosion much the molecular clock (see p. 133).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Can You Engineer an Insect Exoskeleton?
    Page 1 of 14 Can you Engineer an Insect Exoskeleton? Submitted by Catherine Dana and Christina Silliman EnLiST Entomology Curriculum Developers Department of Entomology, University of Illinois Grade level targeted: 4th Grade, but can be easily adapted for later grades Big ideas: Insect exoskeleton, engineering, and biomimicry Main objective: Students will be able to design a functional model of an insect exoskeleton which meets specific physical requirements based on exoskeleton biomechanics Lesson Summary We humans have skin and bones to protect us and to help us stand upright. Insects don’t have bones or skin but they are protected from germs, physical harm, and can hold their body up on their six legs. This is all because of their hard outer shell, also known as their exoskeleton. This hard layer does more than just protect insects from being squished, and students will get to explore some of the many ways the exoskeleton protects insects by building one themselves! For this fourth grade lesson, students will work together in teams to use what they learn about exoskeleton biomechanics to design and build a protective casing. To complete the engineering design cycle, students can use what they learn from testing their case to redesign and re-build their prototype. Prerequisites No prior knowledge is required for this lesson. Students should be introduced to the general form of an insect to facilitate identification of the exoskeleton. Live insects would work best for this, but pictures and diagrams will work as well. Instruction Time 45 – 60 minutes Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) Framework Alignment Disciplinary Core Ideas LS1.A: Structure and Function o Plants and animals have both internal and external structures that serve various functions in growth, survival, behavior, and reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Endoskeleton
    THE EVOLUTION OF THE VERTEBRATE ENDOSKELETON AN ESSAY ON THE SIGNIFICANCE AND) MEANING OF' SEGMENTATION IN COELOMATE ANIMIALS By W1T. 13. PRIMIROSE, M.B.. Cii.B. Lately Seniior Deniionistrator of lAnatomtiy i? the (nWizversity (of Glasgozc THE EVOLUTION OF THE VERTEBRATE ENDOSKELETON WVHEN investigating the morphology of the vertebrate head, I found it necessary to discover the morphological principles on which the segmentation of the body is founded. This essay is one of the results of this investigations, and its object is to show what has determined the segmented form in vertebrate animals. It will be seen that the segmented form in vertebrates results from a condition which at no time occurs in vertebrate animals. This condition is a form of skeleton found only in animals lower in the scale of organisation than vertebrates, and has the characters of a space containing water. This space is the Coelomic Cavity. The coelomic cavity is the key to the formation of the segmented structure of the body, and is the structure that determines the vertebrate forni. The coclomic cavity is present in a well defined state from the Alnelida tuwards, so that in ainielides it is performing the functions for which a coelom was evolved. It is, however, necessary to observe the conditions prevailing anon)g still lower forms to see why a separate cavity was formed in animals, which became the means of raising them in the scale of organisation, and ultimately leading to the evolution of the vertebrate animal. I therefore propose to trace the steps in evolution by which, I presume, the coelomic cavity originated, and then show how it or its modifications have been the basis on which the whole vertebrate structure of animals is founded.
    [Show full text]
  • Do You Think Animals Have Skeletons Like Ours?
    Animal Skeletons Do you think animals have skeletons like ours? Are there any bones which might be similar? Vertebrate or Invertebrate § Look at the words above… § What do you think the difference is? § Hint: Break the words up (Vertebrae) Vertebrates and Invertebrates The difference between vertebrates and invertebrates is simple! Vertebrates have a backbone (spine)… …and invertebrates don’t Backbone (spine) vertebrate invertebrate So, if the animal has a backbone or a ‘vertebral column’ it is a ‘Vertebrate’ and if it doesn’t, it is called an ‘Invertebrate.’ It’s Quiz Time!! Put this PowerPoint onto full slideshow before starting. You will be shown a series of animals, click if you think it is a ‘Vertebrate’ or an ‘Invertebrate.’ Dog VertebrateVertebrate or InvertebrateInvertebrate Worm VertebrateVertebrate or InvertebrateInvertebrate Dinosaur VertebrateVertebrate or InvertebrateInvertebrate Human VertebrateVertebrate or InvertebrateInvertebrate Fish VertebrateVertebrate or InvertebrateInvertebrate Jellyfish VertebrateVertebrate or InvertebrateInvertebrate Butterfly VertebrateVertebrate or InvertebrateInvertebrate Types of Skeleton § Now we know the difference between ‘Vertebrate’ and ‘Invertebrate.’ § Let’s dive a little deeper… A further classification of skeletons comes from if an animal has a skeleton and where it is. All vertebrates have an endoskeleton. However invertebrates can be divided again between those with an exoskeleton and those with a hydrostatic skeleton. vertebrate invertebrate endoskeleton exoskeleton hydrostatic skeleton What do you think the words endoskeleton, exoskeleton and hydrostatic skeleton mean? Endoskeletons Animals with endoskeletons have Endoskeletons are lighter skeletons on the inside than exoskeletons. of their bodies. As the animal grows so does their skeleton. Exoskeletons Animals with exoskeletons Watch the following have clip to see how they shed their skeletons on their skeletons the outside! (clip the crab below).
    [Show full text]
  • Ediacaran) of Earth – Nature’S Experiments
    The Early Animals (Ediacaran) of Earth – Nature’s Experiments Donald Baumgartner Medical Entomologist, Biologist, and Fossil Enthusiast Presentation before Chicago Rocks and Mineral Society May 10, 2014 Illinois Famous for Pennsylvanian Fossils 3 In the Beginning: The Big Bang . Earth formed 4.6 billion years ago Fossil Record Order 95% of higher taxa: Random plant divisions domains & kingdoms Cambrian Atdabanian Fauna Vendian Tommotian Fauna Ediacaran Fauna protists Proterozoic algae McConnell (Baptist)College Pre C - Fossil Order Archaean bacteria Source: Truett Kurt Wise The First Cells . 3.8 billion years ago, oxygen levels in atmosphere and seas were low • Early prokaryotic cells probably were anaerobic • Stromatolites . Divergence separated bacteria from ancestors of archaeans and eukaryotes Stromatolites Dominated the Earth Stromatolites of cyanobacteria ruled the Earth from 3.8 b.y. to 600 m. [2.5 b.y.]. Believed that Earth glaciations are correlated with great demise of stromatolites world-wide. 8 The Oxygen Atmosphere . Cyanobacteria evolved an oxygen-releasing, noncyclic pathway of photosynthesis • Changed Earth’s atmosphere . Increased oxygen favored aerobic respiration Early Multi-Cellular Life Was Born Eosphaera & Kakabekia at 2 b.y in Canada Gunflint Chert 11 Earliest Multi-Cellular Metazoan Life (1) Alga Eukaryote Grypania of MI at 1.85 b.y. MI fossil outcrop 12 Earliest Multi-Cellular Metazoan Life (2) Beads Horodyskia of MT and Aust. at 1.5 b.y. thought to be algae 13 Source: Fedonkin et al. 2007 Rise of Animals Tappania Fungus at 1.5 b.y Described now from China, Russia, Canada, India, & Australia 14 Earliest Multi-Cellular Metazoan Animals (3) Worm-like Parmia of N.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Taphonomy Shows the Feasibility of Fossil Embryos
    Experimental taphonomy shows the feasibility of fossil embryos Elizabeth C. Raff*, Jeffrey T. Villinski*, F. Rudolf Turner*, Philip C. J. Donoghue†, and Rudolf A. Raff*‡ *Department of Biology and Indiana Molecular Biology Institute, Indiana University, Myers Hall 150, 915 East Third Street, Bloomington, IN 47405; and †Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Queens Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, United Kingdom Communicated by James W. Valentine, University of California, Berkeley, CA, February 23, 2006 (received for review November 9, 2005) The recent discovery of apparent fossils of embryos contempora- external egg envelope within 15–36 days, but no preservation or neous with the earliest animal remains may provide vital insights mineralization of the embryos within was observed (18). into the metazoan radiation. However, although the putative fossil Anyone who works with marine embryos would consider remains are similar to modern marine animal embryos or larvae, preservation for sufficient time for mineralization via phospha- their simple geometric forms also resemble other organic and tization unlikely, given the seeming fragility of such embryos. inorganic structures. The potential for fossilization of animals at Freshly killed marine embryos in normal seawater decompose such developmental stages and the taphonomic processes that within a few hours. We carried out taphonomy experiments might affect preservation before mineralization have not been designed to uncover the impact of the mode of death and examined. Here, we report experimental taphonomy of marine postdeath environment on the preservational potential of ma- embryos and larvae similar in size and inferred cleavage mode to rine embryos and larvae. presumptive fossil embryos.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Eric Davidson and Deep Time Douglas H. Erwin Department Of
    Eric Davidson and Deep Time Douglas H. Erwin Department of Paleobiology, MRC-121 National Museum of Natural History Washington, DC 20013-7012 E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Eric Davidson had a deep and abiding interest in the role developmental mechanisms played in the generating evolutionary patterns documented in deep time, from the origin of the euechinoids to the processes responsible for the morphological architectures of major animal clades. Although not an evolutionary biologist, Davidson’s interests long preceded the current excitement over comparative evolutionary developmental biology. Here I discuss three aspects at the intersection between his research and evolutionary patterns in deep time: First, understanding the mechanisms of body plan formation, particularly those associated with the early diversification of major metazoan clades. Second, a critique of early claims about ancestral metazoans based on the discoveries of highly conserved genes across bilaterian animals. Third, Davidson’s own involvement in paleontology through a collaborative study of the fossil embryos from the Ediacaran Doushantuo Formation in south China. Keywords Eric Davidson – Evolution – Gene regulatory networks – Bodyplan – Cambrian Radiation – Echinoderms 1 Introduction Eric Davidson was a developmental biologist, not an evolutionary biologist or paleobiologist. He was driven to understand the mechanisms of gene regulatory control and how they controlled development, but this focus was deeply embedded within concerns about the relationship between development and evolution. Questions about the origin of major metazoan architectures or body plans were central to Eric’s concerns since at least the late 1960s. His 1971 paper with Roy Britten includes a section on “The Evolutionary Growth of the Genome” illustrated with a figure depicting variations in genome size in major animal groups and a metazoan phylogeny (Britten and Davidson 1971).
    [Show full text]
  • Biology of Echinoderms
    Echinoderms Branches on the Tree of Life Programs ECHINODERMS Written and photographed by David Denning and Bruce Russell Produced by BioMEDIA ASSOCIATES ©2005 - Running time 16 minutes. Order Toll Free (877) 661-5355 Order by FAX (843) 470-0237 The Phylum Echinodermata consists of about 6,000 living species, all of which are marine. This video program compares the five major classes of living echinoderms in terms of basic functional biology, evolution and ecology using living examples, animations and a few fossil species. Detailed micro- and macro- photography reveal special adaptations of echinoderms and their larval biology. (THUMBNAIL IMAGES IN THIS GUIDE ARE FROM THE VIDEO PROGRAM) Summary of the Program: Introduction - Characteristics of the Class Echinoidea phylum. spine adaptations, pedicellaria, Aristotle‘s lantern, sand dollars, urchin development, Class Asteroidea gastrulation, settlement skeleton, water vascular system, tube feet function, feeding, digestion, Class Holuthuroidea spawning, larval development, diversity symmetry, water vascular system, ossicles, defensive mechanisms, diversity, ecology Class Ophiuroidea regeneration, feeding, diversity Class Crinoidea – Topics ecology, diversity, fossil echinoderms © BioMEDIA ASSOCIATES (1 of 7) Echinoderms ... ... The characteristics that distinguish Phylum Echinodermata are: radial symmetry, internal skeleton, and water-vascular system. Echinoderms appear to be quite different than other ‘advanced’ animal phyla, having radial (spokes of a wheel) symmetry as adults, rather than bilateral (worm-like) symmetry as in other triploblastic (three cell-layer) animals. Viewers of this program will observe that echinoderm radial symmetry is secondary; echinoderms begin as bilateral free-swimming larvae and become radial at the time of metamorphosis. Also, in one echinoderm group, the sea cucumbers, partial bilateral symmetry is retained in the adult stages -- sea cucumbers are somewhat worm–like.
    [Show full text]
  • Geobiological Events in the Ediacaran Period
    Geobiological Events in the Ediacaran Period Shuhai Xiao Department of Geosciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA NSF; NASA; PRF; NSFC; Virginia Tech Geobiology Group; CAS; UNLV; UCR; ASU; UMD; Amherst; Subcommission of Neoproterozoic Stratigraphy; 1 Goals To review biological (e.g., acanthomorphic acritarchs; animals; rangeomorphs; biomineralizing animals), chemical (e.g., carbon and sulfur isotopes, oxygenation of deep oceans), and climatic (e.g., glaciations) events in the Ediacaran Period; To discuss integration and future directions in Ediacaran geobiology; 2 Knoll and Walter, 1992 • Acanthomorphic acritarchs in early and Ediacara fauna in late Ediacaran Period; • Strong carbon isotope variations; • Varanger-Laplandian glaciation; • What has happened since 1992? 3 Age Constraints: South China (538.2±1.5 Ma) 541 Ma Cambrian Dengying Ediacaran Sinian 551.1±0.7 Ma Doushantuo 632.5±0.5 Ma 635 Ma 635.2±0.6 Ma Nantuo (Tillite) 636 ± 5Ma Cryogenian Nanhuan 654 ± 4Ma Datangpo 663±4 Ma Neoproterozoic Neoproterozoic Jiangkou Group Banxi Group 725±10 Ma Tonian Qingbaikouan 1000 Ma • South China radiometric ages: Condon et al., 2005; Hoffmann et al., 2004; Zhou et al., 2004; Bowring et al., 2007; S. Zhang et al., 2008; Q. Zhang et al., 2008; • Additional ages from Nama Group (Namibia), Conception Group (Newfoundland), and Vendian (White Sea); 4 The Ediacaran Period Ediacara fossils Cambrian 545 Ma Nama assemblage 555 Ma White Sea assemblage 565 Ma Avalon assemblage 575 Ma 585 Ma Doushantuo biota 595 Ma 605 Ma Ediacaran Period 615 Ma
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Research Online
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 23 May 2017 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Betts, Marissa J. and Paterson, John R. and Jago, James B. and Jacquet, Sarah M. and Skovsted, Christian B. and Topper, Timothy P. and Brock, Glenn A. (2017) 'Global correlation of the early Cambrian of South Australia : shelly fauna of the Dailyatia odyssei Zone.', Gondwana research., 46 . pp. 240-279. Further information on publisher's website: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2017.02.007 Publisher's copyright statement: c 2017 This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk Accepted Manuscript Global correlation of the early Cambrian of South Australia: Shelly fauna of the Dailyatia odyssei Zone Marissa J.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcmenamin FM
    The Garden of Ediacara • Frontispiece: The Nama Group, Aus, Namibia, August 9, 1993. From left to right, A. Seilacher, E. Seilacher, P. Seilacher, M. McMenamin, H. Luginsland, and F. Pflüger. Photograph by C. K. Brain. The Garden of Ediacara • Discovering the First Complex Life Mark A. S. McMenamin C Columbia University Press New York C Columbia University Press Publishers Since 1893 New York Chichester, West Sussex Copyright © 1998 Columbia University Press All rights reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data McMenamin, Mark A. The garden of Ediacara : discovering the first complex life / Mark A. S. McMenamin. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-231-10558-4 (cloth) — ISBN 0–231–10559–2 (pbk.) 1. Paleontology—Precambrian. 2. Fossils. I. Title. QE724.M364 1998 560'.171—dc21 97-38073 Casebound editions of Columbia University Press books are printed on permanent and durable acid-free paper. Printed in the United States of America c 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 p 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 For Gene Foley Desert Rat par excellence and to the memory of Professor Gonzalo Vidal This page intentionally left blank Contents Foreword • ix Preface • xiii Acknowledgments • xv 1. Mystery Fossil 1 2. The Sand Menagerie 11 3. Vermiforma 47 4. The Nama Group 61 5. Back to the Garden 121 6. Cloudina 157 7. Ophrydium 167 8. Reunite Rodinia! 173 9. The Mexican Find: Sonora 1995 189 10. The Lost World 213 11. A Family Tree 225 12. Awareness of Ediacara 239 13. Revenge of the Mole Rats 255 Epilogue: Parallel Evolution • 279 Appendix • 283 Index • 285 This page intentionally left blank Foreword Dorion Sagan Virtually as soon as earth’s crust cools enough to be hospitable to life, we find evidence of life on its surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Unusual Arrangement of Bones at Ichthyosaur State Park in Nevada by Mark A
    GEOLOGY EVIDENCE FOR A TRIASSIC KRAKEN Unusual Arrangement of Bones at Ichthyosaur State Park in Nevada by Mark A. S. McMenamin Did a giant kraken drag nine huge ichthyosaurs back to its lair in the Triassic era, where their fossil remains are found today? The author of this hypothesis tells why he thinks so. he Triassic Kraken hypothesis, pre- Tsented to the Geological Society of America at its October annual meeting in Minneapolis (McMenamin and McMe- namin 2011), generated an enormous amount of attention on Internet media, immediately after the Society’s press re- lease announcing the discovery. Nine gigantic ichthyosaurs are pre- served in a rock layer belonging to the Shaly Limestone Member of the Luning Formation at the Ichthyosaur State Park in Courtesy of Mark McMenamin Nevada. Geological analysis of this fossil Shonisaurus ichthyosaur vertebral disks at the Berlin-Ichthyosaur State Park in Ne- site had shown it to be a deep water de- vada, arranged in curious linear patterns with almost geometric regularity. The ar- posit (Holger 1992), thus invalidating ranged vertebrae in this Specimen-U resemble the pattern of sucker discs on a cepha- Camp’s (1980) original hypothesis that lopod tentacle, with each vertebra strongly resembling a coleoid sucker. the fossil bed represented an ichthyosaur mass-stranding event. Holger’s (1992) metric patterns, some of which resem- bone arrangement has indeed “never study left unexplained, however, how it ble the sucker arrays on cephalopod been observed at other localities.” came to be that nine giant Shonisaurus tentacles. Seilacher remarked that Jurassic ich- ichthyosaurs sequentially accumulated A YouTube video from the Seattle thyosaur skeletons in Germany, which at virtually the same spot on the Triassic Aquarium, showing a Pacific Octopus may provide analogous examples, occur sea floor.
    [Show full text]
  • Insights Into the Role of Redox State in Burgess 1 Shale-Type Taphonomic
    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk Faculty of Science and Engineering School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences 2018-09 On the edge of exceptional preservation: insights into the role of redox state in Burgess Shale-type taphonomic windows from the Mural Formation, Alberta, Canada Sperling, EA http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/11604 10.1042/ETLS20170163 Emerging Topics in Life Sciences All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. 1 On the edge of exceptional preservation: insights into the role of redox state in Burgess 2 Shale-type taphonomic windows from the Mural Formation, Alberta, Canada 3 4 5 6 Erik A. Sperling1*, Uwe Balthasar2, Christian B. Skovsted3 7 8 1 Department of Geological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA 94305 9 10 2 School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Plymouth, PL4 8AA, 11 Plymouth, United Kingdom 12 13 3 Department of Palaeobiology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, SE-104 05 14 Stockholm, Sweden 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 * Corresponding author: 24 Dr. Erik A. Sperling 25 Department of Geological Sciences 26 Stanford University 27 Stanford, CA, USA 94305 28 650-736-0852 (v) 29 [email protected] 30 31 32 Keywords: Cambrian; Mural Formation; Burgess Shale-type preservation; Oxygen; 33 taphonomy; iron reduction 34 35 36 1 37 Abstract 38 39 Animals originated in the Neoproterozoic and ‘exploded’ into the fossil record in the 40 Cambrian.
    [Show full text]