DOCSLIB.ORG

MNR FMZ 11 Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MNR FMZ 11 Management Plan DRAFT Management Plan for FMZ 11 – March 7, 2018 Management Plan Fisheries Management Zone 11 Draft Version 7 March 7, 2018 Ministry of Natural Resources & Forestry i DRAFT Management Plan for FMZ 11 – March 7, 2018 Cette publication hautement spécialisée {name of publication in English} n'est disponible qu'en anglais conformément au Règlement 671/92, selon lequel il n’est pas obligatoire de la traduire en vertu de la Loi sur les services en français. Pour obtenir des renseignements en français, veuillez communiquer avec le ministère des Richesses naturelles et des Forêts au [email protected] ou (705) 475-5520. This highly specialized publication (name) is available in English only in accordance with Regulation 671/92, which exempts it from translation under the French Language Services Act. To obtain information in French, please contact the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry at [email protected] or (705) 475-5520. ii DRAFT Management Plan for FMZ 11 – March 7, 2018 Fisheries Management Zone 11 Management Plan Encompassing Portions of the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Administrative Districts of North Bay, Kirkland Lake, Sudbury, Parry Sound and Pembroke. I certify that this plan has been prepared using the best available science and is consistent with accepted fisheries management principles. I further certify that this plan is consistent with the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry strategic direction, the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry Statement of Environmental Values and direction from other sources. Thus, I recommend this fisheries management plan be approved for implementation. Recommended by: ____________________________________________________ Mitch Baldwin, North Bay District Manager (Date) Recommended by: ____________________________________________________ Deb Weedon, Regional Resources Section Manager (Date) Approved by: _________________________________________________________ Corrinne Nelson, Regional Director, Northeast Region (Date) iii DRAFT Management Plan for FMZ 11 – March 7, 2018 Executive Summary The management plan for Fisheries Management Zone 11 (FMZ 11) is intended to outline the status of the fisheries in the zone, describe management objectives and provide direction for management actions. Fisheries management planning is a key component of the Ecological Framework for Fisheries Management (EFFM) in Ontario. The EFFM is an operational framework that provides the building blocks for improving the way recreational fisheries are managed in Ontario. Fisheries management planning is consistent with the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry’s (MNRF) current strategic directions outlined in Our Sustainable Future, Horizons 2020, and the goals and objectives of the Ontario Biodiversity Strategy. It is also aligned with the fisheries policy principles stated in the Ontario’s Provincial Fish Strategy – Fish for the Future. The plan’s goals, objectives, successes and future direction will be reviewed, as information from subsequent cycles of the Broad-scale Monitoring (BsM) program becomes available. The plan identifies monitoring that will take place to ensure that progress is being made towards meeting the management objectives and targets. The plan is a dynamic document designed to be flexible and adaptable to a wide range of future conditions and will be amended as required, with assistance from the Advisory Council and Indigenous Communities. Purpose and Scope of the Plan The FMZ 11 Management Plan was developed by the MNRF with input and advice from the FMZ 11 Advisory Council which is made up of a group of anglers, stakeholders, researchers, scientists and interested community members. Input and advice was also received through consultation with Indigenous communities with interests on the FMZ landscape. The planning area extends from Temiskaming Shores in the north to Trout Creek and the northern boundary of Algonquin Park in the south. The eastern boundary is the Ottawa River south of Mattawa and extends west to Highway 69, south of the French River (Figure 1). The fisheries management plan identifies management strategies and actions to meet goals and objectives. The intent of the plan is to assist the MNRF in balancing the demands placed on the resource with the biological capacity of the supporting ecosystems. This balance is based on analysis of fisheries data and collaborative discussions with members of the public, government and partner agencies, Indigenous communities and non- governmental agencies. Goal Statements: • Fish Populations: Manage for the improvement of fisheries, including healthy natural fish populations, beyond a minimally sustainable condition, enhance harvest and recreational usage while providing a safe food source. • Aquatic Ecosystems: While minimizing the risk of invasive species, maintain healthy aquatic ecosystems and restore damaged aquatic ecosystems. • Education: Improve the general public’s respect for natural resources, their awareness of ethical practices around aquatic ecosystems and their knowledge of regulatory principles and practices. iv DRAFT Management Plan for FMZ 11 – March 7, 2018 • Socio-Economic: Provide diverse ways for users to experience and interact with resources and promote a fair valuation of the resources so that there is a broad appreciation of the socio-economic benefits that resources furnish. Management Objectives: • To increase or maintain fish abundance • To develop a habitat protection and restoration strategy • To increase public awareness of fisheries management • To work with partners to provide sustainable fishing opportunities • To prevent the arrival, establishment and/or spread of non-native and invasive species. The management plan is comprised of a series of broad management strategies that reflect management priorities within the FMZ, and each strategy identifies the management issues, challenges or opportunities, the status, the associated objectives and management actions. Specifically, these broad strategies include: • Management of Walleye, Lake Trout, Smallmouth and Largemouth Bass, Brook Trout, Northern Pike and Muskellunge • Fish stocking • Ecosystem changes • Fish habitat • Water levels. Walleye Management The existing Walleye regulations (four fish, none between 43cm and 60cm, not more than one over 60cm) initiated in 2008 were forecast to achieve the Walleye population objectives. The decision was to retain the current recreational angling regulation and to continue to review the status of Walleye using BsM information, to determine the need for future management actions to meet plan objectives. Lake Trout Management The status of natural Lake Trout waters in FMZ 11 is of particular concern given that many have been characterized for decades as unhealthy with low abundance. The objectives for Lake Trout are to increase abundance of Lake Trout, more specifically, adult female Lake Trout by modifying the fall Lake Trout season to close Labour Day versus the present September 30 closure. The proposed regulation change will also include a size restriction on natural lakes. Further, a separate size restriction exception is proposed for Lake Temagami due to the unique growth rates of its Lake Trout population. Listed below are the current regulations, preferred option and alternative options for Lake Trout: v DRAFT Management Plan for FMZ 11 – March 7, 2018 * Regulation change; (S) – sports licence; (C) – conservation licence Items Current Option 1 – Preferred Option 2 Option 3 Season Feb 15-3rd Sunday in * Feb 15-3rd Sunday in March; * Feb 15-3rd Sunday in * Feb 15-3rd Sunday in March; 3rd Saturday in May 3rd Saturday in May – Labour March; 3rd Saturday in March; 3rd Saturday in - Sept 30 Day May - August 31 May - August 31 Catch 2 (S) 2 (S) 2 (S) *1 (S) 1 (C) 1 (C) 1 (C) 0 (C) Size None * 1-over 40cm (S); 0-over 40cm (C) Obabika LT closed all year; * Season as above; Lake 0 possession limit 1/0 possession limit Cut and Fish Sanctuary - no fishing * Fish Sanctuary - no fishing McConnell from Jan. 1 - Apr. 30 and from Jan. 1 - Friday before 3rd Lakes Oct. 1 - Dec 31. Live fish Sat in May and Tuesday after may not be used as bait. Labour Day - Dec 31. Live fish may not be used as bait. Put-Grow Catch: 2 (S); 1 (C) Season and catch as proposed and Take above; Lakes No size restriction Lake Catch: 2 (S); 1 (C) Season and catch as proposed Temagami above; * Size exception: 1-over 45cm (S); 0-over 45cm (C) vi DRAFT Management Plan for FMZ 11 – March 7, 2018 Brook Trout The losses of natural and stocked Brook Trout lakes in FMZ 11 and northeastern Ontario are thought to be significant and, in many cases, are due to introduced species of fish either intentionally or carelessly via baitfish use. The inability to compete with introduced species and their dependence on up-welling, coldwater springs have made them very susceptible to decline and to local extirpation. Regulations presently in place are designed to make these fisheries more resilient to introductions while improving fishing quality. The proposed regulation in the draft plan retains the present season, catch and size restriction on natural/diversionary lakes with a proposed change to a live baitfish ban. As proposed, the “Additional Zone 11 fishing opportunities” size restriction will be removed and a restriction on the use of live baitfish is proposed for implementation on these waters as well. Listed below are the current regulations, preferred option and alternative
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Temagami Area Rock Art and Indigenous Routes
    Zawadzka Temagami Area Rock Art 159 Beyond the Sacred: Temagami Area Rock Art and Indigenous Routes Dagmara Zawadzka The rock art of the Temagami area in northeastern Ontario represents one of the largest concentrations of this form of visual expression on the Canadian Shield. Created by Algonquian-speaking peoples, it is an inextricable part of their cultural landscape. An analysis of the distribution of 40 pictograph sites in relation to traditional routes known as nastawgan has revealed that an overwhelming majority are located on these routes, as well as near narrows, portages, or route intersections. Their location seems to point to their role in the navigation of the landscape. It is argued that rock art acted as a wayfinding landmark; as a marker of places linked to travel rituals; and, ultimately, as a sign of human occupation in the landscape. The tangible and intangible resources within which rock art is steeped demonstrate the relationships that exist among people, places, and the cultural landscape, and they point to the importance of this form of visual expression. Introduction interaction in the landscape. It may have served as The boreal forests of the Canadian Shield are a boundary, resource, or pathway marker. interspersed with places where pictographs have Therefore, it may have conveyed information that been painted with red ochre. Pictographs, located transcends the religious dimension of rock art and most often on vertical cliffs along lakes and rivers, of the landscape. are attributed to Algonquian-speaking peoples and This paper discusses the rock art of the attest, along with petroglyphs, petroforms, and Temagami area in northeastern Ontario in relation lichen glyphs, to a tradition that is at least 2000 to the traditional pathways of the area known as years old (Aubert et al.
    [Show full text]
  • An Assessment of the Groundwater Resources of Northern Ontario
    Hydrogeology of Ontario Series (Report 2) AN ASSESSMENT OF THE GROUNDWATER RESOURCES OF NORTHERN ONTARIO AREAS DRAINING INTO HUDSON BAY, JAMES BAY AND UPPER OTTAWA RIVER BY S. N. SINGER AND C. K. CHENG ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND REPORTING BRANCH MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT TORONTO ONTARIO 2002 KK PREFACE This report provides a regional assessment of the groundwater resources of areas draining into Hudson Bay, James Bay, and the Upper Ottawa River in northern Ontario in terms of the geologic conditions under which the groundwater flow systems operate. A hydrologic budget approach was used to assess precipitation, streamflow, baseflow, and potential and actual evapotranspiration in seven major basins in the study area on a monthly, annual and long-term basis. The report is intended to provide basic information that can be used for the wise management of the groundwater resources in the study area. Toronto, July 2002. DISCLAIMER The Ontario Ministry of the Environment does not make any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the ministry. KKK TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2. INTRODUCTION 7 2.1 LOCATION OF THE STUDY AREA 7 2.2 IMPORTANCE OF SCALE IN HYDROGEOLOGIC STUDIES 7 2.3 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY 8 2.4 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE GROUNDWATER RESOURCES 8 2.5 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS 9 2.6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 13 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory of Ontario Jurisdictions Cross-Referenced by Health Unit
    Directory of Ontario Jurisdictions Cross- referenced by Health Unit © Produced and compiled by the Association of Local Public Health Agencies, 2008 Public Health Unit Names Updated 2020 City Health Unit Region ABBEY SUDBURY NORTH EAST ABBOTSFORD PORCUPINE NORTH EAST ABBOTT TP ALGOMA NORTH EAST ABERARDER LAMBTON SOUTH WEST ABERDEEN TP ALGOMA NORTH EAST ABERDEEN GREY-BRUCE SOUTH WEST ABERDEEN ADDITIONAL ALGOMA NORTH EAST ABERFELDY LAMBTON SOUTH WEST ABERFOYLE WELLINGTON-DUFFERIN CENTRAL WEST ABIGO TP ALGOMA NORTH EAST ABINGDON NIAGARA CENTRAL WEST ABINGER KINGSTON EASTERN ABITIBI CANYON PORCUPINE NORTH EAST ABIWIN NORTHWESTERN NORTH WEST ABNEY TP SUDBURY NORTH EAST ABOTOSSAWAY TP ALGOMA NORTH EAST ABRAHAM TP ALGOMA NORTH EAST ABREY TP THUNDER BAY NORTH WEST ACADIA TP SUDBURY NORTH EAST ACANTHUS NORTH BAY NORTH EAST ACHESON TP SUDBURY NORTH EAST ACHIGAN ALGOMA NORTH EAST ACHILL SIMCOE CENTRAL EAST ACHRAY NORTH BAY NORTH EAST ACOUCHICHING NORTH BAY NORTH EAST ACRES TP PORCUPINE NORTH EAST ACTINOLITE HASTINGS EASTERN ACTON TP ALGOMA NORTH EAST ACTON HALTON CENTRAL WEST ACTON CORNERS LEEDS EASTERN ADAIR TP PORCUPINE NORTH EAST ADAMS PORCUPINE NORTH EAST ADAMSON TP THUNDER BAY NORTH WEST AMSVILLE GREY-BRUCE SOUTH WEST ADANAC TP PORCUPINE NORTH EAST ADDINGTON HIGHLANDS TP KINGSTON EASTERN ADDISON TP SUDBURY NORTH EAST ADDISON LEEDS EASTERN ADELAIDE MIDDLESEX SOUTH WEST ADELAIDE METCALFE TP MIDDLESEX SOUTH WEST ADELARD RENFREW EASTERN ADIK ALGOMA NORTH EAST ADJALA SIMCOE CENTRAL EAST ADJALA-TOSORONTIO TP SIMCOE CENTRAL EAST ADMASTON RENFREW EASTERN
    [Show full text]
  • Expl of Temagami Area
    -^S^^©i v".?.* FIK1D PROGRESS REPORT NO. 1. EXPLORATION O? TBUAGMI ARIA. MAY 31, 1955 The activities to date may be summarized aa follows s- (l - Plans and Arrangements. u - Aerial investigation 13 - Ground " *r " U) - Staking. PLANS and ARRANGB.1KNT8 - 4iileswaaas PARDO-10-01 PARDO 010 Arrangements were made with Lakeland Airways for pre liminary aerial investigation, following the first work the air craft became unserviceable and it was necessary to make alter native arrangements for an aircraft with Temiskaming Airways. They have agreed to supply a suitable aircraft and to prepare it for aerial survey work. Preliminary flights indicated the need of a recorder and preamplifier. These are on order and are expected about June 7th, AKRIAL INVESTIGATION - An aerial reconnaissance using a Precision Model 115 Scintillometer at an altitude of 350 feet was raade of the area from Tenagarai to Lake Tamisknming. This area is bounded on the north by uoward and silver Centre, and on the south by Jumping Caribou Lake and iJUffalo Hook on Lake Temiskaming. The width of the area flown was approximately 16 miles. Traverses were parallel to prominent waterways but well off to one side. They were therefore not parallel the distance between traverses varying from -^ mile to 3 miles. Thia reoT.-maissance was made without a recorder. I©rogrebs along the traverse^ lis so rapid that only the radiometric highs can be recorded on a map and there is practically no opportunity for the operator to observe other data which might be useful for interpreta tion. Also recording of higha does not furnish complete picture of conditions along the traverse making interpretation difficult.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.1 Physical and Biological Description Matabitchuan River Watershed
    Physical and Biological Description of the Watershed 2.1 Physical and Biological Description Matabitchuan River Watershed 2.1.1 Physical Description The Matabitchuan River system watershed has a total area of about 933 km2 and is a tributary system to Lake Temiskaming and the Ottawa River Drainage Basin. The Matabitchuan Watershed is bounded by the Montreal River watershed to the north and to the Lake Temagami watershed to the south and west, (Lake Huron Drainage Basin.) The main tributaries include: Net, Cassels, Rabbit, Fourbass Lakes and the Matabitchuan River. There is one generating station, the Matabitchuan GS and three water control dams on the system. A large portion of the Matabitchuan watershed is located within the municipal boundaries of Temagami. Beginning in the north western region of the watershed, headwater tributaries for Net Lake include: Snare, Jackpine, Mountain, Thieving Bear, Kanichee and Rib Lakes. Net Lake is located approximately six km north of the Town of Temagami on Highway 11. Water levels for the lake are controlled by a two-sluice gate / weir concrete dam located at the outflow of the lake into Net Creek. The dam is owned and operated by the Ministry of Natural Resources. The dam, originally a timber crib structure built by the Temagami Timber Company in 1920, was replaced with the current concrete dam by the MNR in 1974. The Net Creek Dam is operated for social / environmental considerations, to a regulated water level of 296.16 m. The lake provides recreational and economic opportunities for residents, cottagers and at present, one tourist camp operator; in addition to supplying domestic water for the Temagami North Town site.
    [Show full text]
  • Temagami Land Use Plan Temagami Land Use Plan 1997 Contents
    TEMAGAMI LAND USE PLAN TEMAGAMI LAND USE PLAN 1997 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Note: This document has been amended, the revisions are italicized and the amendment number is indicated in brackets. The purpose and final revisions of the amendments can also be viewed in Appendix 5, Amendments. 1.0 INTRODUCTION ● 1.1 Plan goal and planning principles ● 1.2 Planning process and public consultation ● 1.3 Planning area ● 1.4 Jurisdiction and administration ● 1.5 Plan framework 2.0 BACKGROUND ● 2.1 Natural resources and values ● 2.2 Planning area setting ● 2.3 Issues ❍ 2.3.1 Access ❍ 2.3.2 Cultural heritage ❍ 2.3.3 Economic development ❍ 2.3.4 Fisheries ❍ 2.3.5 Forestry ❍ 2.3.6 Waste Disposal Sites ❍ 2.3.7 Hunting ❍ 2.3.8 Landscape ecology and natural heritage protection ❍ 2.3.9 Mining ❍ 2.3.10 Plan development/implementation ❍ 2.3.11 Provincial parks ❍ 2.3.12 Protected areas ❍ 2.3.13 Public perception of planning process/public consultation ❍ 2.3.14 Recreation ❍ 2.3.15 Tourism ❍ 2.3.16 Water http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/MNR/temagami/temanew.html (1 of 3) [5/17/2001 3:06:10 PM] TEMAGAMI LAND USE PLAN 3.0 MANAGEMENT DIRECTION ● 3.1 MNR's goal and objectives ● 3.2 CPP's general management strategy ● 3.3 Summary of plan objectives ● 3.4 Summary of strategies ❍ 3.4.1 A landscape management approach ❍ 3.4.2 The management of red and white pine for "old growth" characteristics ❍ 3.4.3 Ecological fire management strategy ❍ 3.4.5 Recreation area strategy ❍ 3.4.6 Cultural heritage strategy ● 3.5 Land use zones ❍ 3.5.1 Elements common to all zones ❍ 3.5.2 Protected Areas ❍ 3.5.3 Special Management Areas ❍ 3.5.4 Integrated Management Areas ❍ 3.5.5 Developed Areas ● 3.6 Management Areas 4.0 IMPLEMENTATION ● 4.1 Resource management planning ● 4.2 Native lands ● 4.3 Review and amendment ● 4.4 Roles of other MNR offices and other government ministries 5.0 GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ACRONYMS 6.0 BIBLIOGRAPHY APPENDICES 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Provided by Alpha Directory of Ontario
    PHI Directory The Membership Committee would like to thank everyone who assisted in updating the PHI directory for 2008. We would also like to thank alPHa for allowing us to use their Directory of Ontario Jurisdictions Cross-Referenced by Health Units document, which is a very useful resource. Both of these documents will be posted on the CIPHI Ontario website and will be circulated on the CIPHI listserv. In an ongoing effort to keep the PHI directory current, we will be updating this document annually. Therefore, if each health unit could appoint one contact person to assist us in this effort it would be greatly appreciated. Any staff, mailing addresses, telephone numbers, fax numbers, or e-mail changes that occur throughout the year can be sent to [email protected] by the appointed contact person. We thank you in advance for your assistance. Sincerely, Dennis Persaud Membership Committee Chair Ontario Branch www.ciphi.on.ca • lead • promote • advocate for Environmental Public Health Professionals in Ontario VISION Health Protection: Cornerstone of Public Health STATEMENT OF MISSION To advance, promote and uphold the profession of public health inspection and to ensure the attainment of the highest professional standards of practice for its members - and in so doing - to facilitate the achievement of optimal health for all persons who live, work or visit in Ontario by promoting excellence in environmental management through education, advocacy and research. Prepared by the 2007-2008 Ontario Branch Executive Council and Board of
    [Show full text]
  • Escribe Agenda Package
    ​THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF TEMAGAMI REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Thursday, January 25, 2018, 6:30 P.M. Welcome Center An audio recording of the Open Session of this meeting is being made and will be available through the Municipal Website as a public service to further enhance access to municipal government services and to continue to promote open and transparent government. As a visitor, your presence may be recorded and your name and address may be revealed during certain parts of the Council meeting. __________________________________________________________________________________________ Pages 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 2. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA Draft Motion: BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Regular / Special Council Meeting Agenda dated January 25, 2018 be adopted as presented / amended. 3. DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OR PECUNIARY INTEREST AND GENERAL NATURE THEREOF 4. CLOSED SESSION 5. ADOPTION OF MINUTES 5.1 Special Council Meeting - Jan 11, 2018 - DRAFT Minutes 1 Draft Motion: BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Minutes of the Special Council meeting held on January 11, 2018 be adopted as presented / amended. 5.2 Special Council Meeting - Zoning By-law Hearing - Jan16, 2018 - DRAFT Minutes 3 Draft Motion: BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Minutes of the Special Council meeting - Zoning By-law Hearing held on January 16, 2018 be adopted as presented / amended. 5.3 Committee of the Whole Meeting - January 16, 2018 - DRAFT Minutes 5 Draft Motion: BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Minutes of the Committee of the Whole meeting held on January 16, 2018 be adopted as presented / amended. 6. BUSINESS ARISING FROM THE MINUTES 7. DELEGATIONS/ PRESENTATIONS 7.1 Registered Delegations/ Presentations 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Gowganda Silver Area, Gowgands Vein Minerals and Anima-Nipissing
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development, Mines and Forestry (MNDMF) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDMF does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDMF is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDMF assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDMF. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDMF neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan for Fisheries Management Zone 11
    Management Plan For Fisheries Management Zone 11 October, 2020 Ministry of Natural Resources & Forestry Management Plan for Fisheries Management Zone 11 Encompassing portions of the Ontario Ministry of natural Resources and Forestry Administrative districts of North Bay, Kirkland Lake, Sudbury, Parry Sound and Pembroke. I certify that this plan has been prepared using the best available science and is consistent with accepted fisheries management principles. I further certify that this plan is consistent with the Ontario Ministry of Natural resources and Forestry strategic direction, the Ontario Ministry of natural resources and Forestry Statement of Environmental Values and direction from other sources. Thus, I recommend this fisheries management plan be approved for Implementation. Prepared and submitted by: Approver Signature Date Jeff Amos Jeff Amos September 14, Aquatic Science Specialist, Northeast Region 2020 Recommended by: Approver Signature Date David Hintz, Manager David Hintz September 17, Fisheries Section, Policy Division 2020 Mitch Baldwin, Lead District Manager Mitch Baldwin September 30, North Bay District 2020 Northeast Region, ROD Andrew Lock, A/Manager Andrew Lock October 8, 2020 Regional Resources Section Northeast Region, ROD Approved by: Approver Signature Date Grant Ritchie, Regional Director, Grant Ritchie October 19, 2020 Northeast Region, ROD Management Plan for FMZ 11 Cette publication hautement spécialisée {Management Plan for Fisheries Management Zone 11} n'est disponible qu'en anglais conformément au Règlement 671/92, selon lequel il n’est pas obligatoire de la traduire en vertu de la Loi sur les services en français. Pour obtenir des renseignements en français, veuillez communiquer avec le ministère des Richesses naturelles et des Forêts au (705) 475- 5550.
    [Show full text]
  • South Lorrain Township
    THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”).
    [Show full text]
  • Directory of Ontario Jurisdictions Cross-Referenced by Health Unit
    Directory of Ontario Jurisdictions Cross-referenced by Health Unit © Produced and compiled by the Association of Local Public Health Agencies, 2009 City Health Unit Region ABBEY SUDBURY NORTH EAST ABBOTSFORD PORCUPINE NORTH EAST ABBOTT TP ALGOMA NORTH EAST ABERARDER LAMBTON SOUTH WEST ABERDEEN TP ALGOMA NORTH EAST ABERDEEN GREY-BRUCE SOUTH WEST ABERDEEN ADDITIONAL ALGOMA NORTH EAST ABERFELDY LAMBTON SOUTH WEST ABERFOYLE WELLINGTON-DUFFERIN CENTRAL WEST ABIGO TP ALGOMA NORTH EAST ABINGDON NIAGARA CENTRAL WEST ABINGER KINGSTON EASTERN ABITIBI CANYON PORCUPINE NORTH EAST ABIWIN NORTHWESTERN NORTH WEST ABNEY TP SUDBURY NORTH EAST ABOTOSSAWAY TP ALGOMA NORTH EAST ABRAHAM TP ALGOMA NORTH EAST ABREY TP THUNDER BAY NORTH WEST ACADIA TP SUDBURY NORTH EAST ACANTHUS NORTHBAY PARRYSOUND NORTH EAST ACHESON TP SUDBURY NORTH EAST ACHIGAN ALGOMA NORTH EAST ACHILL SIMCOE CENTRAL EAST ACHRAY NORTHBAY PARRYSOUND NORTH EAST ACOUCHICHING NORTHBAY PARRYSOUND NORTH EAST ACRES TP PORCUPINE NORTH EAST ACTINOLITE HASTINGS EASTERN ACTON TP ALGOMA NORTH EAST ACTON HALTON CENTRAL WEST ACTON CORNERS LEEDS EASTERN ADAIR TP PORCUPINE NORTH EAST ADAMS PORCUPINE NORTH EAST ADAMSON TP THUNDER BAY NORTH WEST AMSVILLE GREY-BRUCE SOUTH WEST ADANAC TP PORCUPINE NORTH EAST ADDINGTON HIGHLANDS TP KINGSTON EASTERN ADDISON TP SUDBURY NORTH EAST ADDISON LEEDS EASTERN ADELAIDE MIDDLESEX SOUTH WEST ADELAIDE METCALFE TP MIDDLESEX SOUTH WEST ADELARD RENFREW EASTERN ADIK ALGOMA NORTH EAST ADJALA SIMCOE MUSKOKA CENTRAL EAST ADJALA-TOSORONTIO TP SIMCOE MUSKOKA CENTRAL EAST ADMASTON RENFREW
    [Show full text]