Gender Equality and the First Amendment
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Carnegie Corporation of New York a N N U a L R E P O R T 2004-2005 Carnegie Corporation of New York
Carnegie Corporation of New York COMBINED ANNU A L R E P O R T 2004-2005 ANNU A L R E P O R T 2004-2005 Carnegie Corporation of New York Carnegie Corporation of New York was created by Andrew Carnegie in 1911 to promote “the advancement and diffusion of knowledge and understanding.” Under Carnegie’s will, grants must benefit the people of the United States, although up to 7.4 percent of the funds may be used for the same purpose in countries that are or have been members of the British Commonwealth, with a current emphasis on sub-Saharan Africa. As a grantmaking foundation, the Corporation seeks to carry out Carnegie’s vision of philanthropy, which he said should aim “to do real and permanent good in this world.” © 2007 Carnegie Corporation of New York Contents REPORT OF THE PrESIDENT I Reflections on Encounters With Three Cultures 2004 REPORT ON PrOGRAM 1 Ongoing Evaluation Enhances the Corporation’s Grantmaking Strategies in 2004 Grants and Dissemination Awards Education International Development International Peace and Security Strengthening U.S. Democracy Special Opportunities Fund Carnegie Scholars Dissemination Anonymous $15 Million in Grants to Cultural and Social Service Institutions in New York City 2004 REPORT ON FINANCES 77 Financial Highlights 2004 REPORT ON ADMINISTRATION 91 Fiscal 2004: The Year in Review 2005 REPORT ON PrOGRAM 97 Key Programs Meet the Challenges of Maturity in 2005 Grants and Dissemination Awards Education International Development International Peace and Security Strengthening U.S. Democracy Special Opportunities -
Revenge Porn
Fordham Urban Law Journal Volume 42 Number 1 Comparative Urban Governance: Article 2 Citymaking In A Global Era April 2016 No Vengeance for 'Revenge Porn' Victims: Unraveling Why this Latest Female-Centric, Intimate-Partner Offense is Still Legal, and Why We Should Criminalize It Sarah Bloom Fordham University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons, Law and Politics Commons, and the Sexuality and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Sarah Bloom, No Vengeance for 'Revenge Porn' Victims: Unraveling Why this Latest Female-Centric, Intimate-Partner Offense is Still Legal, and Why We Should Criminalize It, 42 Fordham Urb. L.J. 233 (2014). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol42/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Urban Law Journal by an authorized editor of FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NO VENGEANCE FOR ‘REVENGE PORN’ VICTIMS: UNRAVELING WHY THIS LATEST FEMALE-CENTRIC, INTIMATE-PARTNER OFFENSE IS STILL LEGAL, AND WHY WE SHOULD CRIMINALIZE IT Sarah Bloom* Introduction ............................................................................................. 234 I. The Devastating Impact of Revenge Porn and the Context of Cyberharassment and Intimate Partner Crimes ............................ 240 A. Tangible Consequences of Revenge Porn .......................... 240 B. Abstract Consequences of Revenge Pornography Online and Offline ................................................................ 244 C. The Unique Problem of Cyberharassment ........................ 245 D. Society’s Historical Treatment of Intimate Partner Crimes.................................................................................... -
When Your Boo Becomes a Ghost: the Association Between Breakup Strategy and Breakup Role in Experiences of Relationship Dissolution
Western University Scholarship@Western Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository 6-21-2018 11:00 AM When Your Boo Becomes a Ghost: The Association Between Breakup Strategy and Breakup Role in Experiences of Relationship Dissolution Rebecca B. Koessler The University of Western Ontario Supervisor Campbell, Lorne J. The University of Western Ontario Graduate Program in Psychology A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree in Master of Science © Rebecca B. Koessler 2018 Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd Part of the Social Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Koessler, Rebecca B., "When Your Boo Becomes a Ghost: The Association Between Breakup Strategy and Breakup Role in Experiences of Relationship Dissolution" (2018). Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository. 5402. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/5402 This Dissertation/Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Western. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository by an authorized administrator of Scholarship@Western. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract Two studies examined ghosting, a unilateral breakup strategy that involves avoiding technologically-mediated contact with a partner instead of providing a verbal indication of the desire to break up. Study 1 solicited open-ended responses regarding experiences with ghosting and explored associations between ghosting and a variety of dispositional and situational variables. Study 2 investigated differences in the process of relationship dissolution and post-breakup outcomes as a function of breakup role (disengager or recipient) and breakup strategy (ghosting or direct conversation) across two samples. -
New Economic School Annual Report, 2000-2001 for the New Economic School, Moscow
New Economic School Annual Report, 2000-2001 for the New Economic School, Moscow Suite 1721, Nakhimovskii Prospekt 47, 117418 Moscow, Russian Federation. ( tel(7)(095) 129-3844 or 129-3722 @ fax(7)(095)129-3722 = E-mail [email protected] NES Annual Report, 2000-2001 Table of Contents Introduction _______________________________________________________________1 The Academic Program ______________________________________________________3 Overview _______________________________________________________________3 Course Offerings for Academic Year 2000-2001 _______________________________3 Pre-Academic Year______________________________________________________3 Module I: 4 September - 29 October 2000 ___________________________________3 Module II: 30 October - 24 December 2000___________________________________5 Module III: 15 January - 11 March 2001 _____________________________________7 Module IV: 12 March – 6 May 2001 ________________________________________8 Module V: 14 May - 8 July 2001 __________________________________________10 English Language Instruction _____________________________________________11 Faculty __________________________________________________________________12 Public Seminar _________________________________________________________13 The Students______________________________________________________________15 Current Students: Profile_________________________________________________15 TABLE 1.A: BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON STUDENTS ENROLLED AT NES, 2000-2001 -- CLASS OF 2001_________________________________________________________15 -
Barnard College Bulletin 2017-18 3
English .................................................................................... 201 TABLE OF CONTENTS Environmental Biology ........................................................... 221 Barnard College ........................................................................................ 2 Environmental Science .......................................................... 226 Message from the President ............................................................ 2 European Studies ................................................................... 234 The College ........................................................................................ 2 Film Studies ........................................................................... 238 Admissions ........................................................................................ 4 First-Year Writing ................................................................... 242 Financial Information ........................................................................ 6 First-Year Seminar ................................................................. 244 Financial Aid ...................................................................................... 6 French ..................................................................................... 253 Academic Policies & Procedures ..................................................... 6 German ................................................................................... 259 Enrollment Confirmation ........................................................... -
1 To: Drafting Committee on Unauthorized Disclosure of Intimate
To: Drafting Committee on Unauthorized Disclosure of Intimate Images Act From: Mary Anne Franks, Reporter Subject: Explanatory Memo Date: December 2, 2016 I. The Issue The disclosure of private, sexually explicit images without consent and for no legitimate purpose – often referred to as “revenge porn” – causes immediate, devastating, and in many cases irreversible harm. A vengeful ex-partner, opportunistic hacker, or rapist can upload an explicit image of a victim to a website where thousands of people can view it and hundreds of other websites can share it. In a matter of days, that image can dominate the first several pages of search engine results for the victim’s name, as well as being emailed or otherwise exhibited to the victim’s family, employers, co-workers, and peers. Victims are frequently threatened with sexual assault, stalked, harassed, fired from jobs, and forced to change schools.1 Some victims have committed suicide.2 While nonconsensual pornography affects both male and female individuals, available evidence to date indicates that the majority of victims are women and girls and that women and girls face often more serious consequences as a result of their victimization.3 Nonconsensual pornography refers to sexually explicit images and video disclosed without consent and for no legitimate purpose. The term encompasses footage obtained by hidden cameras, consensually exchanged images within a confidential relationship, stolen photos, and recordings of sexual assaults. Nonconsensual pornography often plays a role in intimate -
The Internet of Garbage
1 The Internet of Garbage © 2015, 2018 by Sarah Jeong Cover and Illustrations by William Joel for The Verge, © 2018 Vox Media, Inc. All rights reserved. The Verge Edition 1.5 August 2018 Published by Vox Media, Inc. www.theverge.com ISBN: 978-0-692-18121-8 2 Table of Contents Preface ............................................... 4 Chapter One: The Internet Is Garbage .................. 6 A Theory of Garbage .......................................... 8 Spam as Garbage .............................................. 9 Chapter Two: On Harassment ........................... 12 Harassment in the News ...................................... 13 About That Media Narrative . ............................ 18 Is Harassment Gendered? ..................................... 20 Intersections of Harassment ................................. 21 On Doxing ................................................... 24 SWATting .................................................... 27 Doxing Women ................................................ 28 Concluding Thoughts on Doxing ............................... 30 A Taxonomy of Harassment .................................... 32 On Modern-Day Social Media Content Moderation ............... 35 What Happens Before: Setting Norms .......................... 38 Chapter Three: Lessons from Copyright Law ............ 40 The Intersection of Copyright and Harassment ................ 41 How the DMCA Taught Us All the Wrong Lessons ................ 44 Turning Hate Crimes into Copyright Crimes ................... 47 Chapter Four: A -
Stephen Pimpare CV
STEPHEN PIMPARE Education ● Ph.D., Political Science (Public Policy), City University of New York Graduate Center (2002) ● B.S., Community & Human Services (Urban Studies and Nonprofit Management), State University of New York – Empire State College (1998) Current Academic Appointments ● Principal Lecturer (2019-present); Senior Lecturer (2015-2019), University of New Hampshire at Manchester ● Founding Coordinator, Public Service & Nonprofit Leadership Program, University of New Hampshire at Manchester (2018-present) ● Founding Director, Center for Community Engagement & Experiential Learning, University of New Hampshire at Manchester (2018-present) ● Faculty Fellow, Carsey School of Public Policy, University of New Hampshire at Durham (2015-present) Previous Academic Appointments ● Online Instructor, Simmons University School of Social Work (2015-2019) ● Adjunct Associate Professor ○ New York University Silver School of Social Work (2010-2015) ○ Columbia University School of Social Work (2011-2014) ○ Silberman School of Social Work at Hunter College, CUNY (2011-2013) ● Associate Professor ○ Yeshiva University, Wurzweiler School of Social Work & Yeshiva College (2007-2010) ● Assistant Professor ○ Yeshiva University, Wurzweiler School of Social Work & Yeshiva College (2004-2007) ● Visiting Assistant Professor ○ City University of New York, Hunter College Department of Political Science (2002-2004) ● Adjunct Assistant Professor; Adjunct Instructor ○ City University of New York, Brooklyn College Department of Political Science (2000-2002) -
Undergraduate Admissions
UNDERGRADUATE CATALOG UNIVERSITY OF THE PEOPLE September 1, 2020 – August 31, 2021 595 E. Colorado Blvd., Suite 623 Pasadena, CA 91101 www.UoPeople.edu [email protected] Tel. +1 626 264 8880 Table of Amendments (Ongoing) Section Amended (Nature of change) Page Number Effective Date Processing Fees (Addition) 50 August 23, 2020 August 23, 2020 Total Estimated Fees (Addition) 52 UoPeople Catalog | September 1, 2020 – August 31, 2021 2 Previous versions of the UoPeople Catalog can be found on the UoPeople website. Administration President Mr. Shai Reshef Provost Dr. David H. Cohen Chief Financial Officer Mr. Paul Affuso General Counsel Mr. Jeffrey Fromm, Esq. Senior Vice President for Enrollment Mr. Asaf Wolff Senior Vice President for Operations Mr. Rami Ish-Hurvitz Senior Vice President for Information Systems and Technology Mr. Brent Altman Vice President for Strategic Planning Mr. Yoav Ventura Vice President for Business Development Ms. Pascaline Servan-Schreiber Board of Trustees Mr. Ashok J. Chandrasekhar, Goldfarb Seligman & Co., Chair Hon. Justice Christine M. Durham, Utah Supreme Court Mr. Daniel J.H. Greenwood, Hofstra University Dr. Gabriel Hawawini, INSEAD Mr. Shai Reshef, President, University of the People Ms. Pascaline Servan-Schreiber, Vice President for Business Development, University of the People Mr. Antoine Van Agtmael, Foreign Policy Group UoPeople Catalog | September 1, 2020 – August 31, 2021 3 President’s Council President Emeritus John Sexton, New York University, Chair President Haifa Jamal Al-Lail, Effat University President Emerita Lisa Anderson, American University in Cairo Former President Craig Calhoun, London School of Economics and Political Science Former Chancellor Nicholas Dirks, UC Berkeley Rector Yves Flückiger, University of Geneva Principal and Vice Chancellor Suzanne Fortier, McGill University Rector Emerita Mrs. -
Danielle Keats Citron, Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law
PREPARED WRITTEN TESTIMONY AND STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD FOR Danielle Keats Citron, Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law HEARING ON “Fostering a Healthier Internet to Protect Consumers” BEFORE THE House Committee on Energy and Commerce October 16, 2019 John D. Dingell Room, 2123, Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. INTRODUCTION Thank you for inviting me to appear before you to testify about corporate responsibility for online activity and fostering a healthy internet to protect consumers. My name is Danielle Keats Citron. I am a Professor of Law at the Boston University School of Law. In addition to my home institution, I am an Affiliate Faculty at the Berkman Klein Center at Harvard Law School, Affiliate Scholar at Stanford Law School’s Center on Internet & Society, Affiliate Fellow at Yale Law School’s Information Society Project, and Tech Fellow at NYU Law’s Policing Project. I am also a 2019 MacArthur Fellow. My scholarship focuses on privacy, free speech, and civil rights. I have published more than 30 articles in major law reviews and more than 25 opinion pieces for major news outlets.1 My book Hate Crimes in Cyberspace tackled the phenomenon of cyber stalking and what law, companies, and society can do about it.2 As a member of the American Law Institute, I serve as an adviser on Restatement (Third) Torts: Defamation and Privacy and the Restatement (Third) Information Privacy Principles Project. In my own writing and with coauthors Benjamin Wittes, Robert Chesney, Quinta Jurecic, and Mary Anne Franks, I have explored the significance of Section 230 to civil rights and civil liberties in a digital age.3 * * * Summary: In the early days of the commercial internet, lawmakers recognized that federal agencies could not possibly tackle all noxious activity online. -
Boone's Lick Heritage Quarterly
Boone’s Lick Heritage QuarterLy The Marmadukes: A Boonslick First Family A Family Divided by War The Marmaduke Children Coming of Age VoL. 17 no. 4 — Winter 2018 BoonsLick HistoricaL society PeriodicaL Editor's Page The Politics of Place and Family “The ‘Boonslick Country’ of central Missouri was in connections, but they were predominantly Southerners the early nineteen century the most fertile and popu- and slaveholders, who stood apart from the urban- lous area of the state. From 1821 to 1861, this region commercial interests of the state. This central Missouri dominated Missouri’s agricultural production, econo- structure supported [Thomas H.] Benton and his pro- my and its politics. The Marmadukes and their Sap- gram until the growing controversy over the slavery pington and Jackson relatives of Saline County near question split the party’s ranks.” notes historian Perry Arrow Rock McCandless, in constituted a his A History of powerful family Missouri, Vol- political dynasty. ume II: 1820- The patriarch 1860. of this family “To understand dynasty was Dr. their attitudes John Sapping- and roles in the ton.” war it is benefi- The lead para- cial to examine graph, a quota- their back- tion from this ground,” Dickey issue’s feature writes. article (page Complimenting 4) by historian this is the fol- Michael Dickey, lowing article, aptly sums up an excerpt from the importance a forthcoming of central Mis- biography of souri – the Meredith Miles Boonslick – and Marmaduke its patrician fam- (page 12) by ilies who played author Lee M. dominant roles Cullimore. He in the state’s presents an inti- economy and politics in the early to mid-nineteenth mate portrait of the children born to Meredith and wife century until torn apart by the polarization of the Civil Lavinia (Sappington) Marmaduke – three daughters War. -
United States District Court Northern District of California San Jose Division
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION THINK COMPUTER CORPORATION, Plaintiff, Case No.: v. COMPLAINT FOR DWOLLA, INC.; ACTBLUE, LLC; AIRBNB, INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND INC.; POUND PAYMENTS ESCROW JURY DEMAND SERVICES, INC. DBA BALANCED PAYMENTS; CLINKLE CORPORATION; COINBASE, INC.; COINLAB, INC.; FACEBOOK, INC.; FACEBOOK PAYMENTS, INC.; GOPAGO, INC.; GUMROAD, INC.; SQUARE, INC.; THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY; A-GRADE INVESTMENTS, LLC; A-GRADE INVESTMENTS II, LLC; ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ LLC; ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ FUND I, LP; ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ FUND I-A, LP; ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ FUND I-B, LP; ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ FUND II, LP; ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ FUND II-A, LP; ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ FUND II-B, LP; ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ FUND III, LP; ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ FUND III (AIV), LP; ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ FUND III-A, LP; ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ FUND III-B, LP; ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ FUND III-Q, LP; DIGITAL SKY TECHNOLOGIES, LIMITED; DST GLOBAL, LIMITED; DSTG-2 2011 ADVISORS, LLC; DSTG-2 2011 INVESTORS DLP, LLC; DSTG-2 2011 INVESTORS ONSHORE, LP; KLEINER PERKINS CAUFIELD & BYERS, LLC; KLEINER PERKINS CAUFIELD & BYERS XIII, LLC; KLEINER PERKINS CAUFIELD & BYERS XIII FOUNDERS FUND, LLC; KLEINER PERKINS CAUFIELD & BYERS XIV, LLC; KLEINER PERKINS CAUFIELD & 1 BYERS XV, LLC; SEQUOIA CAPITAL, LLC; SEQUOIA CAPITAL NEW PROJECTS, LLC; SEQUOIA CAPITAL XII, LP; SC XII MANAGEMENT, LLC; SEQUOIA CAPITAL XII PRINCIPALS FUND, LLC; SEQUOIA CAPITAL SCOUT FUND I, LLC; SEQUOIA CAPITAL SCOUT FUND II, LLC; SEQUOIA CAPITAL U.S. SCOUT FUND III, LLC; SEQUOIA CAPITAL U.S. SCOUT SEED FUND 2013, LP; SEQUOIA TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS XII, LP; Y COMBINATOR, LLC; Y COMBINATOR FUND I, LP; Y COMBINATOR FUND I GP, LLC; Y COMBINATOR FUND II, LP; Y COMBINATOR FUND II GP, LLC; Y COMBINATOR RE, LLC; Y COMBINATOR S2012, LLC; Y COMBINATOR W2013, LLC; BRIAN CHESKY; MAX LEVCHIN; YURI MILNER; YISHAN WONG, Defendants.