DOCSLIB.ORG

The Walls of Jericho: an Alternative Interpretation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Walls of Jericho: an Alternative Interpretation The Walls of Jericho: An Alternative Interpretation The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Bar-Yosef, O. 1986. The Walls of Jericho: An Alternative Interpretation. Current Anthropology 27, no. 2: 157-162. Published Version doi:10.1086/203413 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12211567 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA sitionalevents in this area; these sectionsare based on Ken- REPORTS yon's fielddrawings and writtendescriptions (Kenyon 1981). The available 14C dates as reportedby Burleigh(1981, 1983) are shownin boththe table and the figure.The firstNeolithic The Walls of Jericho:An Alternative occupationswere labelled "Proto-Neolithic"by KenyQn,but the lithicanalysis of Crowfoot-Payne(1983) has demonstrated Interpretation' thatthe assemblage,mainly derived from a limitedexcavation in Square M, does not differfrom the restof the Pre-Pottery Neolithic A (henceforthPPNA) assemblages. This industry by 0. BAR-YOSEF was renamed "Sultanian" and has since been found at two Institute of Archaeology,Hebrew University,Jerusalem in Schulden- 91905, Israel. 30 VI 85 additionalsites the JordanValley-Gilgal (Noy, rein, and Tchernov 1980) and Netiv Hagdud (Bar-Yosef, "The walls of Jericho"immediately remind us of the biblical Gopher,and Goring-Morris1980). storydescribing the conquest of this ancienttown by Joshua It is onlysubsequent to theearliest occupations that the free- and the invadingIsraelite army. Like the Homericepic about standingwall and towerwere built. The firstperimeter wall, the destructionof Troy, which motivatedH. Schliemannto 3.6 m high,was 1.8 m thickat its base and only 1.1 m at its conductone of the firstexcavations in the Near East, so the preservedtop. The tower,placed inside the perimeterof the tale of Jerichohas made the site attractiveto scholarsinter- settlement,was 8.2 m high(ca. 9 m in diameterat thebase and ested in revealing biblical remains beneath the dust. The 7 m at thetop) and builtof undressedstones. It had a staircase mound of Tell es-Sultanin the JordanValley has long been leading to the top with 22 steps built of dressed slabs. Its confidentlyequated withthe biblicalJericho, and the wish to preservedoutlet seems to be the originalone. No roomswere uncoverthe walls that collapsed at the blast of the Israelite foundinside the tower.The available 14C dates indicatethat trumpetshas led to a seriesof excavations at themound (fig. 1). the constructionoccurred between 8300 B.C. and 7800 B.C., The pioneerwas C. Warren,who dug a fewholes in 1873 but whichmay mean around 8000 B.C. as estimatedby Kenyon. thenabandoned the site and wenton to excavatein Jerusalem. Stages IV-V consistedof the buildingof an additionalwall The Germans E. Sellin and C. Watzingerdug a series of (or only the thickeningof the firstwall) and the diggingof a trenchesbetween 1907 and 1909, and theywere followedby ditch in frontof it, probably because the continuousrapid J. Garstang,1930-36, and K. Kenyon, 1952-58. alluviationwas endangeringthe existing structures. The tower While the town walls destroyedby Joshua'sarmy have not was an extremelyheavy structure (about 1,000tons) and prob- been found,a seriesof Early Bronze-and Middle Bronze-Age ably experienceddifferential subsidence of the underlying slip- walls and an impressiverampart have been uncoveredand perymarl. There is clear archaeologicalevidence that it had to studiedin detail. Beneath the biblicalJericho, first Garstang's be repairedat thisstage. and later the major excavationsof Kenyon uncoveredthick The ditch was filledrapidly, motivating the additionof a depositsof very early Pre-Pottery Neolithic occupation. A par- thirdwall, and at the same period the staircasewas blocked ticularlysurprising discovery made by Kenyon in the basal (Stages VI and VIA). Continuousaccumulations on bothsides layersof thisoccupation was the existenceof a massive stone consistingof naturalaggradation enriched with occupational perimeterwall. It is withthe interpretation of this wall and the debris on the westernface and occupationalremains on the towerassociated with it thatthis paper is concerned.The re- easternface caused thewalls to go out ofuse, leavingthe tower cent publicationof the finalarchaeological reports, a project stillsomewhat elevated above its surroundings.The 14Cread- forwhich T. A. Holland is to be congratulated,makes it possi- ings pointto a date of ca. 7400-7300 B.C. In thefinal stage of ble to reexamineKenyon's conclusions using her own detailed the PPNA periodthe perimeterwall was entirelyburied. observations(Kenyon 1981; Kenyonand Holland 1982, 1983). The lower courses of the PPNA perimeterwall were also The oldest remains at Jerichoare dated to the Natufian foundin the northerntrench (Trench II) and were somewhat culture,though not to its latestphase as recentlydefined (Bar- betterpreserved in the southerntrench (Trench III). In these Yosef 1981a, Valla 1984). Then, followinga gap of nearlya instancesthe wall was thinner,only 1.4 m and 1.6 m respec- millennium(ca. 9200-8350 B.C.), thesite was settledby one of tively.At thenorthern end ofthe settlement the perimeter wall theearly farming communities. The occupiedarea was a mod- was heavilydamaged by a floodingwadi which leftonly the eratelysloping plain formedby the retreatof the Late Pleis- lowercourse of stonesunder a wadi channelsome 15 m wide toceneLisan Lake (fig.1). The plain is coveredby brownsoils and about 1.5 m deep in itscentral thalweg. That thewadi was and gravelswashed in by Wadi Nuceima,Wadi el-Mafjar,and able to wash away a supposedlystone wall is somewhatunex- Wadi Qilt, formingthe arable land of the Jerichooasis. pected, given the presenceof softoccupation levels on either Table 1 summarizesthe main constructionand destruction side; perhapsit was a mud-brickconstruction on stonefounda- eventsin the area of Trench I and squares FI, DI, and DII, tions. In the southerntrench the truncationof the already wherethe walls, the tower,and adjacent buildingswere par- buried PPNA layers is interpretedas resultingfrom severe tiallyexposed. Figure 2 tentativelyreconstructs the main depo- floodingin Wadi el-Mafjar. Kenyonconcluded that the oval mound of Jerichowas en- circledby a defensivewall enclosingan area of 2.4 hectares (originallymiscalculated as 4.0). Her estimateof 3,000-4,000 ' ? 1986 by The Wenner-GrenFoundation for Anthropological Re- forthe site's populationis too high in view of the size of the search,all rightsreserved 0011-3204/86/2702-0005$1.00. The reexami- site, and the resultsof recent ethnoarchaeologicalresearch nationof some of the archaeological problems of Jericho stemmed from (Kramer 1982) point to an estimateof 400-900. Additional researchon Early Neolithicsites in the Lower JordanValley. Field- work was fundedby the Wenner-GrenFoundation for Anthropolog- walls, also interpretedby Kenyonas "town walls," were un- ical Research (1980-81) and by the National Geographic Society coveredin the westerntrench and dated to the followingpe- (1983-84), to whomI am verygrateful for their support. I would like riod, the Pre-PotteryNeolithic B (ca. 7300-6000 B.C.). These to thankP. Goldbergand A. Gopherof the Instituteof Archaeology, were slantingwalls built of large undressedstones, retaining Hebrew University,for many useful discussions in the field;GI. Isaac the earlierlevels. Both the picturesof the walls and the draw- and J. Merkel of the Peabody Museum, Harvard University,and Z. ing ofthe trench-section clearly show that,as has been pointed Herzog of the Instituteof Archaeology,Tel Aviv University,for their helpfulcomments on an earlierdraft; and B. Isaac forthe drawings.I out by Mellaart (1975:59), thesewere retainingwalls. am, however,fully responsible for any shortcomingsof the present Kenyon'sinterpretations of her strikingdiscoveries may be version. summarizedas follows: Vol. 27 * No. 2 * April 1986 157 This content downloaded from 128.103.149.52 on Sun, 11 May 2014 22:17:58 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 'I~~~~~~Q \) , .0 0 0 o.. JFF~ICHO` *.o . 00 O~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~0 kml . ....... *--~~~~~~~~~~~JERICHO FIG. 1. The topographicsituation of the tellof Jericho. Note the low ridge,immediately west of the tell,bordered by Wadi Nuceimain thenorth and Wadi el-Mafjarin the south. Topographyis shownin 10-rncontours. Today's springrises on the mid-easteredge of the tell. 1. The presenceof a thick,free-standing wall and a tower that period and the specific location of Jericho and the indicatea communaleffort to fortifythe settlement. (The effort geomorphicprocesses that may have influencedits history. requiredto build the perimeterwall was later calculated by The evolutionof prehistoricentities as representedin the Dorrell[1978] as about a week's worthfor 200 men; a recalcu- archaeologicalrecord has recentlybeen studiedin depthin the lationbased on a morerealistic estimate of 0.5 m3per man per various geographicunits of the Near East (Sinai, the Negev, day yieldsa figureof 10,400work days or about 104 workdays Edom, the Jordan Valley, the Damascus plateau, the El for 100 men). Kowm basin, and the Middle EuphratesValley). On the basis 2. As a walled site, Jerichodeserves to be called a "town" of such featuresas site size, lithic and faunal assemblages,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Why the Walls of Jericho Came Tumbling Down
    WHY THE WALLS OF JERICHO CAME TUMBLING DOWN SHUBERT SPERO What follows is an attempt to give a rational explanation for the fall of the walls of Jericho following the siege of the city by the Israelite forces led by 1 Joshua. The theory I wish to propose is designed not to replace the textual account but to complement it. That is, to suggest a reality that does not contradict the official version but which may have been behind it and for whose actual occurrence several hints may be found in the text. The fall of the walls of Jericho was indeed a wondrous event and the text properly sees God as the agent in the sense that it was He who inspired Joshua to come up 2 with his ingenious plan. Our theory suggests a connection between the two outstanding features of the story: (1) The adventure of the two Israelite spies in the house of Rahab the inn-keeper, before the Israelites crossed the Jordan, and (2) the mystify- ing circling of the city by the priestly procession for the seven days preceding the tumbling down of the walls. Let us first review the salient facts involved in the incident of the spies. We are told that Rahab's dwelling was part of the city wall and that in the wall she dwelt (Josh. 2:15) with a window that looked out on the area outside the city. The spies avoid capture by the Canaanite authorities through the efforts of Rahab and, in gratitude, they promise the woman that she and her family will not be harmed during the impending attack, and instruct her to gather them all into her house and hang scarlet threads in the window.
    [Show full text]
  • (AMS) Dates for the Epipaleolithic Settlement at Abu Hureyra, Syria
    Radiocarbon Accelerator (AMS) Dates for the Epipaleolithic Settlement at Abu Hureyra, Syria Item Type Article; text Authors Moore, A. M. T.; Gowlett, J. A. J.; Hedges, R. E. M.; Hillman, G. C.; Legge, A. J.; Rowley-Conwy, P. A. Citation Moore, A. M. T., Gowlett, J. A. J., Hedges, R. E. M., Hillman, G. C., Legge, A. J., & Rowley-Conwy, P. A. (1986). Radiocarbon accelerator (AMS) dates for the Epipaleolithic settlement at Abu Hureyra, Syria. Radiocarbon, 28(3), 1068-1076. DOI 10.1017/S0033822200020130 Publisher American Journal of Science Journal Radiocarbon Rights Copyright © The American Journal of Science Download date 01/10/2021 02:24:30 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Version Final published version Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/652764 [RADIOCARBON, Vol. 28, No, 3, 1986, P 1068-1076] RADIOCARBON ACCELERATOR (AMS) DATES FOR THE EPIPALEOLITHIC SETTLEMENT AT ABU HUREYRA, SYRIA A M T MOORE*, J A J GOWLETT**, R E M HEDGES**, G C HILLMAN-, A J LEGGED and P A ROWLEY-CONWY ABSTRACT. The prehistoric settlement of Abu Hureyra in Syria was occupied in both the Epipaleolithic and Neolithic periods. It has provided significant evidence for changes in econ- omy at the time of the inception of agriculture in southwest Asia. Twenty accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) dates have been obtained to determine the duration of occupation of the Epipaleolithic settlement there and the precise age of samples of cereal grains and animal bones found within it. The results have demonstrated that the AMS technique can answer such questions because it dates exceedingly small samples with high precision.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bible, the Qur'an and Science
    مكتبةمكتبة مشكاةمشكاة السإلميةالسإلمية The Bible, The Qur'an and Science The Holy Scriptures Examined In The Light Of Modern Knowledge by Dr. Maurice Bucaille Translated from French by Alastair D. Pannell and The Author مكتبةمكتبة مشكاةمشكاة السإلميةالسإلمية Table of Contents Foreword.........................................................................................3 Introduction......................................................................................3 The Old Testament..........................................................................9 The Books of the Old Testament...................................................13 The Old Testament and Science Findings....................................23 Position Of Christian Authors With Regard To Scientific Error In The Biblical Texts...........................................................................33 Conclusions...................................................................................37 The Gospels..................................................................................38 Historical Reminder Judeo-Christian and Saint Paul....................41 The Four Gospels. Sources and History.......................................44 The Gospels and Modern Science. The General Genealogies of Jesus.........................................................................................62 Contradictions and Improbabilities in the Descriptions.................72 Conclusions...................................................................................80
    [Show full text]
  • The Macrobotanical Evidence for Vegetation in the Near East, C. 18 000/16 000 B.C to 4 000 B.C
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons University of Pennsylvania Museum of University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology Papers Archaeology and Anthropology 1997 The Macrobotanical Evidence for Vegetation in the Near East, c. 18 000/16 000 B.C to 4 000 B.C. Naomi F. Miller University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/penn_museum_papers Part of the Near Eastern Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Miller, N. F. (1997). The Macrobotanical Evidence for Vegetation in the Near East, c. 18 000/16 000 B.C to 4 000 B.C.. Paléorient, 23 (2), 197-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/paleo.1997.4661 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/penn_museum_papers/36 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Macrobotanical Evidence for Vegetation in the Near East, c. 18 000/16 000 B.C to 4 000 B.C. Abstract Vegetation during the glacial period, post-glacial warming and the Younger Dryas does not seem to have been affected by human activities to any appreciable extent. Forest expansion at the beginning of the Holocene occurred independently of human agency, though early Neolithic farmers were able to take advantage of improved climatic conditions. Absence of macrobotanical remains precludes discussion of possible drought from 6,000 to 5,500 ВС. By farming, herding, and fuel-cutting, human populations began to have an impact on the landscape at different times and places. Deleterious effects of these activities became evident in the Tigris-Euphrates drainage during the third millennium ВС based on macrobotanical evidence from archaeological sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Palestine - Walking Through History
    Palestine - Walking through History April 04 - 08, 2019 Cultural Touring | Hiking | Cycling | Jeep touring Masar Ibrahim Al-Khalil is Palestine’s long distance cultural walking route. Extending 330 km from ​ the village of Rummana in the northwest of Jenin to Beit Mirsim southwest of Al-Haram al-Ibrahimi (Ibrahimi Mosque) in Hebron. The route passes through more than fifty cities and villages where travelers can experience the legendary Palestinian hospitality. Beginning with a tour of the major sites in Jerusalem, we are immediately immersed in the complex history of the region. Over the five days, we experience sections of this route, hiking and biking from the green hills of the northern West Bank passing through the desert south of Jericho to Bethlehem. Actively traveling through the varied landscapes, biodiverse areas, archaeological remains, religious sites, and modern day lively villages, we experience rich Palestinian culture and heritage. Palestinians, like their neighboring Arabs, are known for their welcoming warmth and friendliness, important values associated with Abraham (Ibrahim). There is plenty of opportunity to have valuable encounters with local communities who share the generosity of their ancestors along the way, often over a meal of delicious Palestinian cuisine. The food boasts a range of vibrant and flavorsome dishes, sharing culinary traits with Middle Eastern and East Mediterranean regions. Highlights: ● Experience Palestine from a different perspective – insights that go beyond the usual headlines ● Hike and bike through beautiful landscapes ● Witness history in Jerusalem, Sebastiya, Jericho, Bethlehem ● Map of the route ITINERARY Day 1 – 04 April 2019 - Thursday : ​ Our trip begins today with a 8:00am pick-up at the hotel in Aqaba, the location on AdventureNEXT Near East.
    [Show full text]
  • Muslim Women's Pilgrimage to Mecca and Beyond
    Muslim Women’s Pilgrimage to Mecca and Beyond This book investigates female Muslims pilgrimage practices and how these relate to women’s mobility, social relations, identities, and the power struc- tures that shape women’s lives. Bringing together scholars from different disciplines and regional expertise, it offers in-depth investigation of the gendered dimensions of Muslim pilgrimage and the life-worlds of female pilgrims. With a variety of case studies, the contributors explore the expe- riences of female pilgrims to Mecca and other pilgrimage sites, and how these are embedded in historical and current contexts of globalisation and transnational mobility. This volume will be relevant to a broad audience of researchers across pilgrimage, gender, religious, and Islamic studies. Marjo Buitelaar is an anthropologist and Professor of Contemporary Islam at the University of Groningen, The Netherlands. She is programme-leader of the research project ‘Modern Articulations of Pilgrimage to Mecca’, funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO). Manja Stephan-Emmrich is Professor of Transregional Central Asian Stud- ies, with a special focus on Islam and migration, at the Institute for Asian and African Studies at Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Germany, and a socio-cultural anthropologist. She is a Principal Investigator at the Berlin Graduate School Muslim Cultures and Societies (BGSMCS) and co-leader of the research project ‘Women’s Pathways to Professionalization in Mus- lim Asia. Reconfiguring religious knowledge, gender, and connectivity’, which is part of the Shaping Asia network initiative (2020–2023, funded by the German Research Foundation, DFG). Viola Thimm is Professorial Candidate (Habilitandin) at the Institute of Anthropology, University of Heidelberg, Germany.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Conquests of Canaan
    ÅA Wars in the Middle East are almost an every day part of Eero Junkkaala:of Three Canaan Conquests our lives, and undeniably the history of war in this area is very long indeed. This study examines three such wars, all of which were directed against the Land of Canaan. Two campaigns were conducted by Egyptian Pharaohs and one by the Israelites. The question considered being Eero Junkkaala whether or not these wars really took place. This study gives one methodological viewpoint to answer this ques- tion. The author studies the archaeology of all the geo- Three Conquests of Canaan graphical sites mentioned in the lists of Thutmosis III and A Comparative Study of Two Egyptian Military Campaigns and Shishak and compares them with the cities mentioned in Joshua 10-12 in the Light of Recent Archaeological Evidence the Conquest stories in the Book of Joshua. Altogether 116 sites were studied, and the com- parison between the texts and the archaeological results offered a possibility of establishing whether the cities mentioned, in the sources in question, were inhabited, and, furthermore, might have been destroyed during the time of the Pharaohs and the biblical settlement pe- riod. Despite the nature of the two written sources being so very different it was possible to make a comparative study. This study gives a fresh view on the fierce discus- sion concerning the emergence of the Israelites. It also challenges both Egyptological and biblical studies to use the written texts and the archaeological material togeth- er so that they are not so separated from each other, as is often the case.
    [Show full text]
  • Al-Aqsa Arabic, Literally
    al-Aqsa Arabic, literally “the more remote,” but re- GLOSSARY ferring to the entire Muslim religious complex en- compassing the Dome of the Rock and the Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem Ateret Cohanim Hebrew, literally “the Priestly crown,” the name of a religious nationalist organization whose purpose is to settle Jews in East Jerusalem and the Muslim quarters of the Old City bayan Arabic, “proclamations, reports,” but also meaning “patency, obviousness” al-Buraq Arabic, also al-Buraq al-Sharif, or “noble Bu- raq.” The name of Muhammad’s steed, it is by tra- dition also the name given by Muslims to the site Jews commonly refer to as the Western, or Wailing Wall in Jerusalem. Muslim tradition holds that it is at this site that Muhammad tethered Buraq on his night journey, known as the Isra to the Aqsa. Hakeren Lemorshet Hakotel Hama’aravi Hebrew, for the Western Wall Heritage Foundation al-Haram al-Sharif Arabic, literally “the noble enclosure or compound,” the term refers to the same compound as the Aqsa, i.e., the Muslim Sanctuary contained of the original Herodian walls once bounding the Hebrew Temple in Jerusalem. In its center stands the Dome of the Rock Jamiyyat Hirasat al-Masjid al-Aqsa wal-Amakin al-Islamiyya al-Muqaddasa bil Quds Arabic, for the Society for the Protection of the Aqsa Mosque and the Islamic Holy Places in Jerusalem Lajnat al-Difaan al-Buraq al-Sharif Arabic, for Defense Committee for the Buraq al-Sharif, variously translated by the Shaw Commission as the Defense Com- mittee for the Noble Buraq al-Majlis al-Shari al-Islami
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID Proceedings of the 5Th
    Burying the Dead in Late Neolithic Syria Akkermans, P.M.M.G.; Cordoba, J.M.; Molist, M.; Perez, C.; Rubio, I.; Martinez, S. Citation Akkermans, P. M. M. G. (2006). Burying the Dead in Late Neolithic Syria. Proceedings Of The 5Th International Congress On The Archaeology Of The Ancient Near East, 621-645. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/15850 Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown) License: Leiden University Non-exclusive license Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/15850 Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable). UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID Proceedings of the 5th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Proceedings of the 5th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East Madrid, April 3-8 2006 Edited by Joaquín Mª Córdoba, Miquel Molist, Mª Carmen Pérez, Isabel Rubio, Sergio Martínez (Editores) Madrid, 3 a 8 de abril de 2006 Actas del V Congreso Internacional de Arqueología del Oriente Próximo Antiguo VOL. III Centro Superior de Estudios sobre el Oriente Próximo y Egipto Madrid 2008 Colección Actas © ISBN (OBRA COMPLETA): 978-84-8344-140-4 ISBN (VOL. III): 978-84-8344-147-3 Depósito legal: GU-129/2009 Realiza: Palop Producciones Gráficas. Impreso en España. Diseño de cubierta: M.A. Tejedor. 5th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East V Congreso Internacional de Arqueología del Oriente Próximo Antiguo Scientific Committee Scientific Steering Committee Comité Científico Organizador Comité Científico Permanente Joaquín Mª Córdoba Manfred Bietak Sergio Martínez Barthel Hrouda (honorary member) Miquel Molist Hartmut Kühne Mª Carmen Pérez Jean-Claude Margueron Isabel Rubio Wendy Matthews Paolo Matthiae Diederik Meijer Ingolf Thuesen Irene J.
    [Show full text]
  • Networking in the Neolithic: Obsidian Sourcing at Abu Hureyra (N. Syria)
    Networking in the Neolithic: Obsidian Sourcing at Abu Hureyra (N. Syria) Tristan Carter, Deanna Aubert, Kelly Brown, and Sean Doyle1 1 Department of Anthropology, McMaster University / McMaster Archaeological XRF Laboratory [MAX Lab] (4) Results (6) Discussion and Future Directions Using strontium (Sr), and zirconium (Zr) contents, four Abu Hureyra’s consumption of both eastern and central compositional groups are distinguished (Fig. 4). Anatolian obsidian forms part of a northern Levantine PPN - PN tradition. One group’s chemical signature matches that of Göllü Dağ obidibsidian from central AliAnatolia (n=60). The largest data-set Comparable assemblages are attested at Cheikh Hassan, (n=123), matches Bingöl B in eastern Anatolia (Fig. 1). El Kowm 2, Mureybet, Qdeir 1, and Tell Kosak Shamali inter alia (Chataigner 1998). 73 artefacts have the high Zr values, and green colour of peralkaline obsidian. Elemental ratios discriminate them Next we need to move from discussing the circulation into Bingöl A (n=26), and Nemrut Dağ (n=47). of raw materials per se, and to consider their specific forms of consumption. Five artefacts match the ‘Group 3d’sourceofRenfrewet al (1966); while the location is unknown, its distribution Fig. 1. Abu Hureyra & major Anatolian obsidian sources For example, using eastern Anatolian obsidians to make suggests an origin in eastern Anatolia, or Iran (Fig.5). ‘corner thinned blades’ (Fig 3, a & j), is a distinct N. Fig. 2. Trenches D & E: Study assemblages Fig. 5. Distribution of ‘Group 3d’ products (1) Introduction and Aims Levantine / Upper Mesopotamian practice (Fig. 7). 120 Sub-Period Phase Dates Cultural Phase It is this elucidation of such closely shared practices that Located on the Middle Euphrates in N.
    [Show full text]
  • The Distribution of Obsidian in the Eastern Mediterranean As Indication of Early Seafaring Practices in the Area a Thesis B
    The Distribution Of Obsidian In The Eastern Mediterranean As Indication Of Early Seafaring Practices In The Area A Thesis By Niki Chartzoulaki Maritime Archaeology Programme University of Southern Denmark MASTER OF ARTS November 2013 1 Στον Γιώργο 2 Acknowledgments This paper represents the official completion of a circle, I hope successfully, definitely constructively. The writing of a Master Thesis turned out that there is not an easy task at all. Right from the beginning with the effort to find the appropriate topic for your thesis until the completion stage and the time of delivery, you got to manage with multiple issues regarding the integrated presentation of your topic while all the time and until the last minute you are constantly wondering if you handled correctly and whether you should have done this or not to do it the other. So, I hope this Master this to fulfill the requirements of the topic as best as possible. I am grateful to my Supervisor Professor, Thijs Maarleveld who directed me and advised me during the writing of this Master Thesis. His help, his support and his invaluable insight throughout the entire process were valuable parameters for the completion of this paper. I would like to thank my Professor from the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Nikolaos Efstratiou who help me to find this topic and for his general help. Also the Professor of University of Crete, Katerina Kopaka, who she willingly provide me with all of her publications –and those that were not yet have been published- regarding her research in the island of Gavdos.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ancient Near East
    A History of Knowledge Oldest Knowledge What the Jews knew What the Sumerians knew What the Christians knew What the Babylonians knew Tang & Sung China What the Hittites knew What the Japanese knew What the Persians knew What the Muslims knew What the Egyptians knew The Middle Ages What the Indians knew Ming & Manchu China What the Chinese knew The Renaissance What the Greeks knew The Industrial Age What the Phoenicians knew The Victorian Age What the Romans knew The Modern World What the Barbarians knew 1 What the NearEast knew Piero Scaruffi 2004 2 What the Near-East knew • Bibliography – Henry Hodges: Technology in the Ancient World (1970) – Arthur Cotterell: Penguin Encyclopedia of Ancient Civilizations (1980) – Michael Roaf: Mesopotamia and the Ancient Near East (1990) – Hans Nissen: The Early History of the Ancient Near East (1988) – Annie Caubet: The Ancient Near East (1997) – Alberto Siliotti: The Dwellings of Eternity (2000) – Trevor Bryce: The kingdom of the Hittites (1998) – Bernard Lewis: Race and Slavery in the Middle East3 (1992) Ancient Civilizations • River valleys 4 Ancient Civilizations • River valleys – Water means: • drinks, • fishing/agriculture/livestock (food), • transportation • energy 5 The Ancient Near East 6 http://victorian.fortunecity.com/kensington/207/mideast.html Ancient Near East • The evolution of knowledge – End of the ice age – Climatic changes – Hunters follow game that moves to new areas (e.g., northern Europe) – Others turn to farming and hunting new game (cattle, sheep) – Technology (“what farmers
    [Show full text]