Neuromechanism Study of Insect–Machine Interface: Flight Control by Neural Electrical Stimulation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Neuromechanism Study of Insect–Machine Interface: Flight Control by Neural Electrical Stimulation Huixia Zhao1, Nenggan Zheng2*, Willi A. Ribi3, Huoqing Zheng1, Lei Xue2,4, Fan Gong2,4, Xiaoxiang Zheng2,4,5, Fuliang Hu1* 1 College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 2 Qiushi Academy for Advanced Studies (QAAS), Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 3 The Private University of Liechtenstein, Dorfstrasse 24, Triesen, Liechtenstein, 4 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 5 Key Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China Abstract The insect–machine interface (IMI) is a novel approach developed for man-made air vehicles, which directly controls insect flight by either neuromuscular or neural stimulation. In our previous study of IMI, we induced flight initiation and cessation reproducibly in restrained honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) via electrical stimulation of the bilateral optic lobes. To explore the neuromechanism underlying IMI, we applied electrical stimulation to seven subregions of the honeybee brain with the aid of a new method for localizing brain regions. Results showed that the success rate for initiating honeybee flight decreased in the order: a-lobe (or b-lobe), ellipsoid body, lobula, medulla and antennal lobe. Based on a comparison with other neurobiological studies in honeybees, we propose that there is a cluster of descending neurons in the honeybee brain that transmits neural excitation from stimulated brain areas to the thoracic ganglia, leading to flight behavior. This neural circuit may involve the higher-order integration center, the primary visual processing center and the suboesophageal ganglion, which is also associated with a possible learning and memory pathway. By pharmacologically manipulating the electrically stimulated honeybee brain, we have shown that octopamine, rather than dopamine, serotonin and acetylcholine, plays a part in the circuit underlying electrically elicited honeybee flight. Our study presents a new brain stimulation protocol for the honeybee–machine interface and has solved one of the questions with regard to understanding which functional divisions of the insect brain participate in flight control. It will support further studies to uncover the involved neurons inside specific brain areas and to test the hypothesized involvement of a visual learning and memory pathway in IMI flight control. Citation: Zhao H, Zheng N, Ribi WA, Zheng H, Xue L, et al. (2014) Neuromechanism Study of Insect–Machine Interface: Flight Control by Neural Electrical Stimulation. PLoS ONE 9(11): e113012. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0113012 Editor: Paul Graham, University of Sussex, United Kingdom Received May 11, 2014; Accepted October 22, 2014; Published November 19, 2014 Copyright: ß 2014 Zhao et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Data Availability: The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. Funding: The author FLH received the funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61031002), and the Modern Agroindustry Technology Research System from the Ministry of Agriculture of China (CARS-45). The author XXZ received the funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61003150), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. This work is partially supported by Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LZ14F020002). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. * Email: [email protected] (NZ); [email protected] (FH) Introduction behavior in locusts by a chronic electrical stimulation method on different brain sites [10]. And Blondeau (1981) had stimulated Insects, due to their impressive flight skills, are ranked among neurons in the lobula plate of free-moving and fixed Calliphora the best models for studying mechanisms of flight control, and for erythrocephala to evoke course control [11]. In these studies, use in the development of biomimetic micro air vehicles (MAVs) electrical stimulation was used as one of the tools of neuroethology [1]. As MAVs have become an increasingly hot topic of research, to investigate the relationship between animal behavior and the great advances have been made in the past few decades, but nervous system. Beyond that, electrical stimulation was also used significant challenges still remain with regards to payload mass, to artificially control the locomotion of an autonomous bio-robotic flight range, and speed [2,3]. A novel approach called the insect– system. Holzer and Shimoyama (1997) had induced the escape machine interface (IMI), which directly controls the flight behavior turn of cockroach via electrical stimulation to antennae, and built of insects by either neuromuscular or neural stimulation, has been an electronic backpack to control cockroach walking [12]. developed in recent years and promises to overcome some of the As to the IMI for MAVs and flight control, researchers challenges facing MAVs [4,5]. managed to elicit flight initiation and cessation in beetles (Cotinis The use of electrical stimulation to induce behavior in insects is texana and Mecynorhina ugandensis) by applying electrical not new. Singing behavior of the cricket and grasshopper had been stimulation through two electrodes implanted in the bilateral elicited by electrical stimulation of the brain [6,7] and descending optic lobes [13,14,15,16]. Their experiment was inspired by the fibres [8,9]. Rowell (1963) had produced various activities immediate flight cessation of untethered Mecynorhina ugandensis including antennal movements, locomotion, feeding, and sexual in response to abrupt darkening of the environment, which led the PLOS ONE | www.plosone.org 1 November 2014 | Volume 9 | Issue 11 | e113012 Flight Control in Honeybees researchers to hypothesize that the optic lobes might strongly Millonig’s buffer (pH 7.2) for 2–4 h before postfixation in a modulate flight initiation and cessation [5]. While alternating buffered 2% OsO4 solution for 1 h at room temperature. They positive and negative potential pulses at 100 Hz (20% duty cycle) were then dehydrated in an ethanol series (50%, 70%, 80%, 95%, initiated wing oscillations, a relatively long duration pulse caused 10 minutes each and 26100%, 15 minutes each), cleared twice in wing oscillations to cease [16]. Another study found that propylene oxide (15 and 20 minutes), and placed back into stimulating the antennal lobes with 20 Hz, 3.5 Vpp pulses initiated propylene oxide and Araldite mixture (1:1, 2–3 h) before being flight, while 50 Hz, 3.5 Vpp pulses stopped flight, in Manduca embedded in Araldite. Consecutive 1 mm thick sections were cut sexta [17]. In addition, ‘‘throttling’’ (frequency and stroke on a rotatory microtome using a diamond knife and stained with amplitude of wing oscillation) and turning modulation of insect toluidine blue. flight had been achieved by stimulating the optic lobes and basalar muscles [13,16], neck muscles [17] or ventral nerve cord Fixation and positioning system [18,19,20]. One of our previous studies developed a stimulation To assist with positioning the microelectrodes into specific brain protocol in restrained honeybees (Apis mellifera), using alternating subregions, we set up a fixation and positioning system by positive and negative electrical pulses (4 Vpp-40 Hz-40% duty assembling several pieces of equipment, including a honeybee cycle, t = 5 ms, m = 30) between two microwire electrodes clamping device (manufactured by our team), a digital stereotaxic implanted into the bilateral optic lobes to reproducibly generate apparatus (RWD Life Science Co., China), and a gimbaling flight initiation and cessation [21]. stereomicroscope with cold light illuminator (RWD Life Science It is difficult to elucidate the neuronal mechanisms of IMI from Co., China). The set-up is shown in Fig. 1. previous studies because identification of these mechanisms Honeybees were cold anesthetized before being fixed onto the requires electrophysiological or optical recordings of neuronal clamping device. A stereotyped procedure was applied to ensure activity in insects during stimulation [16]. We made some consistent head position of each fixed honeybee. When the rostral preliminary attempts to record neuronal activity, but unfortunately head was pressed down, the interspace between the retral head encountered problems due to interference from noise generated by and the clamp plates was filled up with beeswax–rosin mixture electrical stimulation of the brain (i.e. stimulus artifact) and robust (2:1). Meanwhile, special attention was paid to adjust the head avoidance behaviors of the insects (such as abdomen twitch and midline in accordance with a reference line on the clamp plates wing oscillations). We therefore posed an alternative question, (Fig. 1). After fixation, the honeybee underwent limb amputation namely how will stimulation of specific brain subregions (with the because legs gripping onto the clamp plates would hinder wing exception of the optic