DOCSLIB.ORG

Boundary Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2144) Draft Biological

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Boundary Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2144) Draft Biological Boundary Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2144) Draft Biological Assessment Seattle City Light March 2010 DRAFT BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background ..................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Project Purpose ................................................................................................ 3 2 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................... 3 2.1. Site Description ............................................................................................... 3 2.2. Action Areas .................................................................................................... 8 2.2.1. Aquatic Action Area .........................................................................................8 2.2.2. Terrestrial Action Area .....................................................................................8 2.3. Aquatic Species ............................................................................................... 9 2.3.1. Reservoir and Delta Habitat Conditions .........................................................17 2.3.2. Habitat Connectivity .......................................................................................27 2.3.3. Water Quality .................................................................................................36 2.3.4. Ecosystem Functions ......................................................................................39 2.4. Terrestrial Species ......................................................................................... 47 2.4.1. Canada Lynx ...................................................................................................49 2.4.2. Woodland Caribou .........................................................................................50 2.4.3. Grizzly Bear ...................................................................................................51 3 Description of Actions......................................................................................................... 52 3.1. Proposed Project Operation ........................................................................... 52 3.2. Conservation Measures Affecting Aquatic Species ...................................... 53 3.2.1. Gravel Augmentation Below Box Canyon Dam ............................................54 3.2.2. Channel Modifications for Mainstem Trapping Pools at Project RM 30.3 ....56 3.2.3. Mainstem Large Woody Debris at Tributary Deltas ......................................57 3.2.4. Boundary Reservoir Fish Community Monitoring and Evaluation of Salmonid Predation at Select Tributary Deltas ..............................................59 3.2.5. Upstream Fish Passage ...................................................................................60 3.2.6. Reduction of Project Related Entrainment Mortality .....................................62 3.2.7. Tributary Non-native Trout Suppression and Eradication .............................63 3.2.8. Riparian Improvement and Stream Channel Enhancement in Sullivan Creek RM 0.00 to RM 0.54 ......................................................................................65 3.2.9. Stream and Riparian Improvements in Sullivan Creek from RM 2.30 to 3.0 and North Fork Sullivan Creek ......................................................................67 3.2.10. LWD Placement and Road Improvements in Sullivan Creek and Selected Tributaries Upstream of the Confluence with Outlet Creek ...........................69 3.2.11. Culvert Replacements and LWD Placement in Tributaries to Boundary Reservoir ........................................................................................................71 3.2.12. Riparian Planting, Culvert Replacement and Channel Reconstruction in Linton Creek RM 0.00 to RM 0.24 ................................................................72 3.2.13. Riparian and Channel Improvements in Sweet Creek RM 0.0 to RM 0.6 .....73 Boundary Hydroelectric Project Seattle City Light FERC No. 2144 i March 2010 DRAFT BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT 3.2.14. Habitat Improvement in Tier-2 Tributaries to Boundary Reservoir ...............76 3.2.15. Closure and Restoration of Sullivan Creek Dispersed Recreation Sites ........77 3.2.16. Mill Pond Dam Site Monitoring and Maintenance ........................................78 3.2.17. Native Salmonid Conservation Program ........................................................79 3.2.18. Recreational Fish Stocking Program ..............................................................80 3.2.19. Total Dissolved Gas .......................................................................................81 3.2.20. Operations ......................................................................................................82 3.3. Conservation Measures Affecting Terrestrial Species .................................. 83 4 Effects of Action .................................................................................................................. 83 4.1. Aquatic Species ............................................................................................. 83 4.1.1. Direct Effects ..................................................................................................83 4.1.2. Environmental Baseline and Cumulative Effects ...........................................86 4.2. Terrestrial Species ......................................................................................... 89 4.2.1. Canada Lynx ...................................................................................................90 4.2.2. Woodland Caribou .........................................................................................91 4.2.3. Grizzly Bear ...................................................................................................91 5 Conclusions .......................................................................................................................... 92 5.1. Aquatic Species ............................................................................................. 92 5.2. Terrestrial Species ......................................................................................... 94 6 References ............................................................................................................................ 95 Boundary Hydroelectric Project Seattle City Light FERC No. 2144 ii March 2010 DRAFT BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT List of Tables Table 1.0-1. Threatened and Endangered species in the Boundary Project Action Area addressed in this BA. ...........................................................................................................1 Table 2.3-1. Threatened fish species that occur in the vicinity of the Boundary Hydroelectric Project. ........................................................................................................10 Table 2.3-2. Descriptive statistics for tributaries to Boundary Reservoir. ....................................12 Table 2.3-3. Observations of bull trout in Boundary Reservoir, Boundary Dam tailrace, and tributaries to Boundary Reservoir, 1980 - 2009. .........................................................13 Table 2.3-4. List of tributaries, their calculated Habitat Suitability Indices, and their relative ranking for generic “salmonid” adult, juvenile, and fry life stages in the tributary delta areas of Boundary Reservoir derived from the Hickman and Raleigh (1982) riverine model. .......................................................................................................24 Table 2.3-5. Boundary Reservoir average monthly temperature values, their associated suitability, and final reservoir Habitat Suitability Index using Hickman and Raleigh’s (1982) lacustrine model. ....................................................................................24 Table 2.3-6. Estimated mortality through Boundary Dam for different pathways and fish size. ....................................................................................................................................29 Table 2.3-7. Summary of large woody debris collected at the Boundary Dam during 2007 and 2008. ............................................................................................................................43 Table 2.4-1. Federally-listed Threatened and Endangered terrestrial species that may occur in the Project vicinity. ........................................................................................................49 Table 3.2-1. Pools proposed for modification in trapping and stranding Region 10 (“Cobble Sisters”). .............................................................................................................57 Table 3.2-2. Relationship between fish size and estimated turbine mortality at Boundary Dam. ...................................................................................................................................63 Table 3.2-3. Boundary watershed waterbodies identified for suppression or eradication activities. ............................................................................................................................64 Table 5.1-1. Summary diagnostics matrix of effects of the proposed conservation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • License Application Boundary Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2144)
    License Application Boundary Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2144) Seattle City Light September 2009 LICENSE APPLICATION TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENTS AND DEFINITIONS List of Tables ............................................................................................................................. ix List of Figures .......................................................................................................................... xiv List of Abbreviations and Acronyms ....................................................................................... xxi INITIAL STATEMENT EXHIBIT A: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 Contents and Purpose of This Exhibit .............................................................................. A-1 2 General Project Description............................................................................................... A-1 3 Project Area and Vicinity ................................................................................................... A-1 4 Project Lands ...................................................................................................................... A-5 5 License Requirements ......................................................................................................... A-5 5.1. License Articles ............................................................................................................. A-5 5.2. Additional FERC Orders ............................................................................................... A-8 5.3. Other Licenses/Permits
    [Show full text]
  • The Skagit-High Ross Controversy: Negotiation and Settlement
    Volume 26 Issue 2 U.S. - Canada Transboundary Resource Issues Spring 1986 The Skagit-High Ross Controversy: Negotiation and Settlement Jackie Krolopp Kirn Marion E. Marts Recommended Citation Jackie K. Kirn & Marion E. Marts, The Skagit-High Ross Controversy: Negotiation and Settlement, 26 Nat. Resources J. 261 (1986). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol26/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Natural Resources Journal by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. JACKIE KROLOPP KIRN* and MARION E. MARTS** The Skagit-High Ross Controversy: Negotiation and Settlement SETTING AND BACKGROUND The Skagit River is a short but powerful stream which rises in the mountains of southwestern British Columbia, cuts through the northern Cascades in a spectacular and once-remote mountain gorge, and empties into Puget Sound approximately sixty miles north of Seattle. The beautiful mountain scenery of the heavily glaciated north Cascades was formally recognized in the United States by the creation of the North Cascades National Park and the Ross Lake National Recreation Area in 1968, and earlier in British Columbia by creation of the E.C. Manning Provincial Park. The Ross Lake Recreation Area covers the narrow valley of the upper Skagit River in Washington and portions of several tributary valleys. It was created as a political and, to environmentalists who wanted national park status for the entire area, controversial, compromise which accom- modated the city of Seattle's Skagit River Project and the then-planned North Cascades Highway.
    [Show full text]
  • 142 FERC ¶ 62,231 UNITED STATES of AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION City of Seattle, Washington Project No. 2144-0
    20130320-3036 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 03/20/2013 142 FERC ¶ 62,231 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION City of Seattle, Washington Project No. 2144-038 ORDER ISSUING NEW LICENSE (March 20, 2013) INTRODUCTION 1. On September 29, 2009, the City of Seattle, Washington (Seattle)1 filed, pursuant to sections 4(e) and 15 of the Federal Power Act (FPA),2 an application for a new license to continue operation and maintenance of its Boundary Hydroelectric Project (Boundary Project or project). The project’s authorized capacity being licensed is 1,003.253 megawatts (MW). The project is located on the Pend Oreille River near the city of Metaline Falls, in Pend Oreille County, Washington.3 The project occupies 609.24 acres of federal land managed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (Forest Service) within the Colville National Forest, and 329.35 acres of federal lands managed by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM).4 2. As discussed below, this order issues a new license for the Boundary Project.5 1 The Boundary Project is operated and maintained by the City of Seattle’s Seattle City Light Department, often referred to as SCL. 2 16 U.S.C. §§ 797(e) and 808 (2006), respectively. 3 The Federal Power Commission (FPC), now the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission), found the Pend Oreille River from Pend Oreille Lake in Idaho downstream to the United States – Canada border to be a navigable waterway of the United States. See Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County, Washington, 11 F.P.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Connectivity at the Boundary Hydroelectric Project
    Early Information Development: Fish Connectivity at the Boundary Hydroelectric Project Boundary Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2144) Prepared for: Seattle City Light Seattle, Washington Prepared by: R2 Resource Consultants, Inc. Redmond, Washington November 2006 EARLY INFORMATION DEVELOPMENT: FISH CONNECTIVITY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1. Project Description............................................................................................. 1-2 2 Potential Habitat Connectivity ........................................................................................... 2-1 2.1. Adfluvial Fish Habitat within Boundary Reservoir............................................ 2-4 2.2. Status of Fish Passage and Adfluvial Fish Habitat at other Pend Oreille River Projects ............................................................................................................... 2-8 2.2.1. Waneta .................................................................................................. 2-8 2.2.2. Seven Mile............................................................................................ 2-8 2.2.3. Box Canyon........................................................................................ 2-10 2.2.4. Albeni Falls......................................................................................... 2-12 2.2.5. Cabinet Gorge and Noxon Rapids .....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Albeni Falls Dam Fish Passage Project, Pend Oreille River, Bonner
    Evan Lewis , Chief, Environmental and Cultural Resources Branch 01EIFW00-2018-F-0259 US Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District Albeni Falls Dam Fish Passage Facility Table of Contents BACKGROUND..................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 4 Consultation History.............................................................................................................. 4 BIOLOGICAL OPINION ........................................................................................................ 5 Description of the Proposed Action ........................................................................................ 5 Action Area ........................................................................................................................ 5 Proposed Action.................................................................................................................. 6 Construction................................................................................................................. 8 Operation and Maintenance of Facility .........................................................................14 Analytical Framework for the Jeopardy and Adverse Modification Determinations ................18 Jeopardy Determination .....................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9 Conclusions and Findings
    Chapter 9 Conclusions and Findings In 1995, the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), and the Bureau of Reclamation jointly led the development of the Columbia River Power System Operation Review Environmental Impact Statement (SOR EIS). The purpose of the SOR EIS was to evaluate different management strategies for the 14 federal dams and reservoirs in the Columbia River Basin that have a major influence on multiple purpose system operations. The SOR environmental analysis was comprehensive, evaluating the potential impacts of the alternatives on the following topics: earth resources, water quality, air quality, anadromous fish, resident fish, wildlife, cultural resources, Native Americans, aesthetics, recreation, flood control, navigation, power, irrigation, municipal and industrial water supply, economics, and social impacts. The Corps and BPA have tiered this Environmental Assessment (EA) to the 1995 SOR EIS. Since the implementation of the SOR preferred alternative in 1995 as modified by the agency Records of Decision (RODs) and subsequent Biological Opinions (BiOps) for addressing endangered species, winter operations at Albeni Falls Dam (AFD) have been largely guided by the interagency coordination on management actions for kokanee spawning, described in Section 3.8 of this EA, and flood risk reduction activities. BPA has proposed to more actively utilize storage behind AFD consistent with existing operational criteria for power generation. The proposal is called Flexible Winter Power Operations (FWPO). This proposal changes the way the dam has operated in recent years, but it is similar to historical winter operations. FWPO includes a new ice best management practice and minimum fluctuation standard operating procedure.
    [Show full text]
  • In Pend Oreille River Below Box Canyon Dam at USGS Primary Gage No
    Compilation of Project Hydrologic Data Preparation of Hydrologic Database and Hydrologic Statistics in Support of Relicensing Studies Boundary Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 2144) Prepared for: Seattle City Light Seattle, Washington Unpublished Work, Copyright 2008 Seattle City Light Prepared by: R2 Resource Consultants, Inc. Redmond, Washington March 2008 Hydrologic Database for Relicensing Studies TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction.......................................................................................................................... 1-1 2 Development of Hourly Hydrologic Database................................................................... 2-1 2.1. Available Data ........................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2. Standardization of Data .......................................................................................... 2-3 2.3. Missing Data........................................................................................................... 2-3 2.4. Anomalies in Data .................................................................................................. 2-4 2.5. Data Synthesis ...................................................................................................... 2-10 2.6. Description of Hourly Hydrologic Database ........................................................ 2-16 3 Basin Hydrology................................................................................................................... 3-1
    [Show full text]
  • Pen D O Reille R Iver EXPLANATION
    451 117°30’117°30’ 117°15’117°15’ 117°117° 116°45’116°45’ 116°30’116°30’ BRITISHBRITISH COLUMBIA COLUMBIA 1239860012398600 CANADACANADA 49°49° WASHINGTONWASHINGTON UNITEDUNITED STATES STATES 1239855012398550 ree CCreek k ee EXPLANATIONEXPLANATION Slatlat S REAL-TIMEREAL-TIME SURFACE-WATER SURFACE-WATER STATION STATION For Fork k NONNON REAL-TIME REAL-TIME SURFACE-WATER SURFACE-WATER STATION STATION thh r rt oo LAKELAKE OR OR RESERVOIR RESERVOIR STATION STATION NN kk 12398000 e e WATER-QUALITYWATER-QUALITY SURFACE-WATER SURFACE-WATER SITE SITE 12398000 Su e e Sulllli r r vaivann CC MetalineMetaline 1239710012397100 C 1239700012397000 Ce de d SullivanSullivan Lake Lake C a C a r e r 12396500 r e r 12396500 e HaH e arrv k k veyey CC WASHINGTON 48°48° r WASHINGTON Pe er Pe e 45'45' e IoneIone e n k n k d d SRSR 3131 SRSR 20 20 h c h c , ann , r a k r k B e B e e t e t r O s r O C e C es r c h r r c h e W e r c e W e n c i aan i Cl rr l e Cl B l l e B l L t e L s t e s a a E E IDAHO STEVENS IDAHO STEVENS PENDPEND OREILLE OREILLE C WASHINGTON l Cr WASHINGTON 48° om il l er 48° oma M il e acac a M ek 30'30' TT CC ek r r e e e R ke R k iv iv e e r r k k e e e r e r C C m m Cusick u Cusick u ok ok o o k k Calispell S Calispell S ll l C C Lake CCaalispepel r Lake lis ere ekk SRSR 48°48° 211 15' 211 15' SRSR 2020 1239550012395500 NewportNewport 005101551015 20 20 MILES MILES 005152551525 10 102020 30 30 KILOMETERS KILOMETERS Figure 48.
    [Show full text]
  • Temporary Restoration of Bull Trout Passage at Albeni Falls Dam
    Temporary restoration of bull trout passage at Albeni Falls Dam by: Mark Paluch, Allan Scholz and Holly McLellan Eastern Washington University Department of Biology Cheney, Washington and Jason Olson Kalispel Tribe of Indians Natural Resources Department Usk, Washington Submitted to: United States Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration Portland, Oregon Date: 21 April 2009 Contract No. 32732 Project No. 2007-246-00 Table of Contents List of Tables ...................................................................................................................... 3 List of Figures..................................................................................................................... 3 Abstract............................................................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgments............................................................................................................... 5 Introduction......................................................................................................................... 6 Methods............................................................................................................................. 10 Study Area .................................................................................................................... 10 Field Collections ........................................................................................................... 12 Bull Trout Tagging and Relocation .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    SECTION 13 – Table of Contents 13 Pend Oreille Subbasin Overview ..................................................................2 13.1 Regional Context for Pend Oreille Subbasin...............................................................2 13.2 Pend Oreille Subbasin Description ..............................................................................2 13.3 Logic Path ..................................................................................................................28 13-1 13 Pend Oreille Subbasin Overview 13.1 Regional Context for Pend Oreille Subbasin The Pend Oreille Subbasin (Figure 13.1) is located in northern Idaho and northeastern Washington and represents the northeastern-most corner of the Intermountain Province (IMP). It is bordered by the Upper Columbia Subbasin to the west, the Coeur d’ Alene and Spokane subbasins to the south, Montana to the east, and Canada to the north. The Pend Oreille River is the largest river in the Subbasin and flows west out of Lake Pend Oreille and north across the Idaho Panhandle and the northeastern corner of Washington before draining into the Columbia River in British Columbia. There are five dams on the Pend Oreille River including two in Canada, the Waneta and Seven Mile, plus Boundary, Box Canyon, and Albeni Falls in the United States. The dams have impacted both aquatic and terrestrial resources. None of the dams have fish passage facilities. Dams in the Pend Oreille tributaries further fragment the connectivity of native salmonid population, including Cedar Creek, Sullivan Lake, Mill Pond, Calispell Pumps, and West Branch LeClerc Creek Log Crib dams. Fish passage is blocked upstream of Lake Pend Oreille in the Clark Fork River at the Cabinet Gorge, Noxon Rapids, and Thompson Falls dams. These Clark Fork River dams are conducting experimental fish passage studies and are evaluating structure designs to pass bull trout and cutthroat trout, but the current numbers of fish passed are limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Parks and Recreation in Pend Oreille County
    PARKS AND RECREATION IN PEND OREILLE COUNTY A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2014 THROUGH 2019 1 | P a g e Pend Oreille County 2 | P a g e Introduction LIST OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS C O U N T Y C OMMISSIONERS STEVE KISS MIKE MANUS, CHAIRMAN KAREN SKOOG P A R K S A N D R E C R E A T I O N B O A R D O F A DVISORS MARK BENDER DON COMINS DAVE GRUVER SAM NICHOLAS, CHAIRMAN JOHN STARK JEANETTA TAYLOR KEN TIMMRECK C ITIZEN ’ S T A S K F ORCE PANDI GRUVER SUSAN HARRIS CAROL MACK WILL SCHEUTZOW CHARLOTTE YERGENS P A R K S A N D R E C R E A T I O N S TAFF MIKE LITHGOW, DIRECTOR, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TERRI ANN HEDTKE, ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 3 | P a g e Introduction P A R K S A N D R E C R E A T I O N C ONSULTANT DIXIE CHICHESTER, UPLAND EDUCATIONAL SERVICES A D D I T I O N A L C ONTRIBUTORS ARMSTRONG, JOHN, RELICENSING PROJECT MANAGER, BOUNDARY DAM, SEATTLE CITY LIGHT ARONOWITZ, MICHAEL, ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DIVISION, SEATTLE CITY LIGHT BARNES, BILL, DIRECTOR, CHEWELAH PEAK LEARNING CENTER BEERGER, NAN, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE BORDON, TERRY, MANAGER, BOUNDARY DAM BROWN, DIANE, TOWN OF METALINE CASADY, GRANT, VERBRUGGE ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER COORDINATOR, WHITWORTH COLLEGE CAUCHY, MARK, PEND OREILLE PUD DAVIS, JESSICA, MAYOR, TOWN OF IONE ENTZ, RAY, KALISPEL TRIBE OF INDIANS FIGG, GREG, WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GRAHAM, JACK, RANGER, CAMP COWLES GREEN, BARBARY, BOUNDARY DAM LICENSE DIVISION MANAGER, SEATTLE CITY LIGHT HARRIS, SUSAN, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, PEND OREILLE RIVER TOURISM ALLIANCE HAWPE, DON, PRINCIPAL, CUSICK SCHOOL DISTRICT HOLTER, CECY, BOUNDARY DAM OFFICE MANAGER HUTCHENSON, SANDY, CLERK, TOWN OF IONE JONES, SEV, PLANNING AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR, KALISPEL TRIBE OF INDIANS KING, RAY, CITY ADMINISTRATOR, CITY OF NEWPORT LEININGER, TERA, TOWN OF METALINE FALLS LOTZE, NANCY, SUPERINTENDENT, SELKIRK SCHOOL DISTRICT MACK, CAROL, PEND OREILLE COUNTY WSU EXTENSION MCCLENNY, FAITH, PEND OREILLE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY MARTIN, KEITH, EASTERN REGION LOCAL PROGRAMS ENGINEER, WA DEPT.
    [Show full text]
  • (Salvelinus Confluentus) in Relation to Fish Passage at Albeni Falls Dam
    Eastern Washington University EWU Digital Commons Biology Faculty Publications Biology 3-2005 Investigations of migratory bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) in relation to fish passage at Albeni allsF Dam Allan T. Scholz Eastern Washington University Holly J. McLellan Eastern Washington University David R. Geist Battelle Pacific Northwest Division Richard S. Brown Battelle Pacific Northwest Division United States Department of the Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.ewu.edu/biol_fac Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Scholz, Allan T.; McLellan, Holly J.; Geist, David R.; Brown, Richard S.; United States Department of the Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District; and Eastern Washington University, "Investigations of migratory bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) in elationr to fish passage at Albeni allsF Dam" (2005). Biology Faculty Publications. 17. https://dc.ewu.edu/biol_fac/17 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Biology at EWU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of EWU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Allan T. Scholz; Holly J. McLellan; David R. Geist; Richard S. Brown; United States Department of the Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District; and Eastern Washington University This book is available at EWU Digital Commons: https://dc.ewu.edu/biol_fac/17 PNWD-3521 Investigations of migratory bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) in relation to fi sh passage at Albeni Falls Dam AUTHORS: Allan T. Scholz 1, Holly J.
    [Show full text]