DOCSLIB.ORG

Eighteenth Century Essays on Shakespeare by D

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eighteenth Century Essays on Shakespeare by D The Project Gutenberg EBook of Eighteenth Century Essays on Shakespeare by D. Nichol Smith This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at http://www.gutenberg.org/license Title: Eighteenth Century Essays on Shakespeare Author: D. Nichol Smith Release Date: October 10, 2009 [Ebook 30227] Language: English ***START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK EIGHTEENTH CENTURY ESSAYS ON SHAKESPEARE*** Eighteenth Century Essays on Shakespeare Edited by D. Nichol Smith, M.A. Glasgow James MacLehose and Sons Publishers to the University 1903 Contents Preface. .2 Introduction. Shakespearian Criticism in the Eighteenth Century. .4 Nicholas Rowe: Some Account of the Life &c. of Mr. William Shakespear. 1709. 59 John Dennis: On the Genius and Writings of Shakespeare. 1711. 83 Alexander Pope: Preface to Edition of Shakespeare. 1725. 106 Lewis Theobald: Preface to Edition of Shakespeare. 1733. 122 Sir Thomas Hanmer: Preface to Edition of Shakespeare. 1744. 150 William Warburton: Preface to Edition of Shakespeare. 1747. 154 Samuel Johnson: Preface to Edition of Shakespeare. 1765. 170 Richard Farmer: An Essay on the Learning of Shakespeare: Addressed to Joseph Cradock, Esq. 1767. 220 Maurice Morgann: An Essay on the Dramatic Character of Sir John Falstaff. 1777. 278 Notes. 365 Nicholas Rowe. 365 John Dennis. 371 Alexander Pope. 374 Lewis Theobald. 378 Sir Thomas Hanmer. 383 William Warburton. 385 Samuel Johnson. 389 Richard Farmer. 396 Maurice Morgann. 426 Index. 429 iv Eighteenth Century Essays on Shakespeare Footnotes . 461 [v] Preface. The purpose of this book is to give an account of Shakespeare's reputation during the eighteenth century, and to suggest that there are grounds for reconsidering the common opinion that the century did not give him his due. The nine Essays or Prefaces here reprinted may claim to represent the chief phases of Shakespearian study from the days of Dryden to those of Coleridge. It is one of the evils following in the train of the romantic revival that the judgments of the older school have been discredited or forgotten. The present volume shows that the eighteenth century knew many things which the nineteenth has rediscovered for itself. It is at least eighty years since most of these essays were reprinted. Rowe's Account of Shakespeare is given in its original and complete form for the first time, it is believed, since 1714; what was printed in the early Variorum editions, and previously in almost every edition since 1725, was Pope's version of Rowe's Account. Dennis's Essay has not appeared since the author republished it in 1721. In all cases the texts have been collated with the originals; and the more important changes in the editions published in the lifetime of the author are indicated in the [vi] Introduction or Notes. The Introduction has been planned to show the main lines in the development of Shakespeare's reputation, and to prove that the new criticism, which is said to begin with Coleridge, takes its rise as early as the third quarter of the eighteenth century. On the question of Theobald's qualifications as an editor, it would appear that we must subscribe to the deliberate verdict of Johnson. We require strong evidence before we may disregard contemporary opinion, and in Theobald's case there is abundant evidence to Preface. 3 confirm Johnson's view. Johnson's own edition, on the other hand, has not received justice during the last century. It is a pleasure to the Editor to record his obligations to Professor Raleigh, Mr. Gregory Smith, and Mr. J. H. Lobban. EDINBURGH, October, 1903. [ix] Introduction. Shakespearian Criticism in the Eighteenth Century. The early nineteenth century was too readily convinced by Coleridge and Hazlitt that they were the first to recognise and to explain the greatness of Shakespeare. If amends have recently been made to the literary ideals of Pope and Johnson, the reaction has not yet extended to Shakespearian criticism. Are we not still inclined to hold the verdicts of Hume and Chesterfield as representative of eighteenth-century opinion, and to find proof of a lack of appreciation in the editorial travesties of the playhouse? To this century, as much as to the nineteenth, Shakespeare was the glory of English letters. So Pope and Johnson had stated in unequivocal language, which should not have been forgotten. “He is not so much an imitator as an instrument of Nature,” said Pope, “and 'tis not so just to say that he speaks from her as that she speaks through him”; and Johnson declared that “the stream of time, which is continually washing the dissoluble fabrics of other poets, passes without injury by the adamant of Shakespeare.” But Pope and Johnson had ventured to point out, in the honesty of their criticism, that Shakespeare was not free from faults; and it was this which the nineteenth century chose to remark. Johnson's Preface in particular was remembered only to be despised. It is [x] not rash to say that at the present time the majority of those who chance to speak of it pronounce it a discreditable performance. This false attitude to the eighteenth century had its nemesis in the belief that we were awakened by foreigners to the greatness of Shakespeare. Even one so eminently sane as Hazlitt lent support to this opinion. “We will confess,” says the Preface to the Characters of Shakespeare's Plays, “that some little jealousy 5 of the character of the national understanding was not without its share in producing the following undertaking, for we were piqued that it should be reserved for a foreign critic to give reasons for the faith which we English have in Shakespeare”; and the whole Preface resolves itself, however reluctantly, into praise of Schlegel and censure of Johnson. When a thorough Englishman writes thus, it is not surprising that Germany should have claimed to be the first to give Shakespeare his true place. The heresy has been exposed; but even the slightest investigation of eighteenth- century opinion, or the mere recollection of what Dryden had said, should have prevented its rise. Though Hazlitt took upon himself the defence of the national intelligence, he incorporated in his Preface a long passage from Schlegel, because, in his opinion, no English critic had shown like enthusiasm or philosophical acuteness. We cannot regret the delusion if we owe to it the Characters of Shakespeare's Plays, but his patriotic task would have been easier, and might even have appeared unnecessary, had he known that many of Schlegel's acute and enthusiastic observations had been anticipated at home. Even those who are willing to give the eighteenth century its due have not recognised how it appreciated Shakespeare. At no time in this century was he not popular. The author of Esmond tells us that Shakespeare was quite out of fashion until Steele brought him back into the mode.1 Theatrical records would alone be sufficient to show that the ascription of this honour to [xi] Steele is an injustice to his contemporaries. In the year that the Tatler was begun, Rowe brought out his edition of the “best of our poets”; and a reissue was called for five years later. It is said by Johnson2 that Pope's edition drew the public attention to Shakespeare's works, which, though often mentioned, had been little read. Henceforward there was certainly an increase in the 1 Esmond, ii. 10. Thackeray was probably recalling a passage in the eighth Tatler. 2 In the Life of Pope. 6 Eighteenth Century Essays on Shakespeare number of critical investigations, but if Shakespeare had been little read, how are we to explain the coffee-house discussions of which we seem to catch echoes in the periodical literature? The allusions in the Spectator, or the essays in the Censor, must have been addressed to a public which knew him. Dennis, who “read him over and over and still remained unsatiated,” tells how he was accused, by blind admirers of the poet, of lack of veneration, because he had ventured to criticise, and how he had appealed from a private discussion to the judgment of the public. “Above all I am pleased,” says the Guardian, “in observing that the Tragedies of Shakespeare, which in my youthful days have so frequently filled my eyes with tears, hold their rank still, and are the great support of our theatre.”3 Theobald could say that “this author is grown so universal a book that there are very few studies or collections of books, though small, amongst which it does not hold a place”; and he could add that “there is scarce a poet that our English tongue boasts of who is more the subject of the Ladies' reading.”4 It would be difficult to explain away these statements. The critical interest in Shakespeare occasioned by Pope's edition may have increased the knowledge of him, but he had been regularly cited, long before Pope's day, as England's [xii] representative genius. To argue that he had ever been out of favour we must rely on later statements, and they are presumably less trustworthy than those which are contemporary. Lyttelton remarked that a veneration for Shakespeare seems to be a part of the national religion, and the only part in which even men of sense are fanatics;5 and Gibbon spoke of the “idolatry for the gigantic genius of Shakespeare, which is inculcated from our infancy as 3 Guardian, No. 37 (23rd April, 1713).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • From the Rhetoric of Longinus to the Poetics of John Dennis the Role of Terror in the Theories of the Sublime in the 18Th Century
    FROM THE RHETORIC OF LONGINUS TO THE POETICS OF JOHN DENNIS THE ROLE OF TERROR IN THE THEORIES OF THE SUBLIME IN THE 18TH CENTURY ZOLTÁN CORA Within the huge literary and artistic tradition of the sublime in Western culture, map- ping, analysing and interpreting the relations of literary and visual sublime is a highly complex issue.1 The affective qualities within the sublime are usually connected to the aesthetic categories of greatness, infinity and terror as well as to philosophical con- cepts of the transcendental. This paper endeavours to interpret the sublime as a possi- ble aesthetic form of an ontological insight that is not gained through conventional syllogisms.2 Additionally, the paper also investigates the role of terror in the rhetorical 1 I will dwell on art theory and art history only where it seems necessary for the coherence of the ar- gumentation, and due to the limits of this study, this restriction will be applied to the theological impli- cations of the sublime as well. 2 Though this statement has been pre-eminently valid since the Kantian discussion of the sublime, still with regard to classical philosophy, it is plausible to argue for a similar meaning already in Greek philosophy, especially Neoplatonism and the tradition of Hermes Trismegistos, and thereby Alexandrian Hermetism. See Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke, The Western Esoteric Traditions: A Historical Introduction Et al. — Critical Theory Online, www.etal.hu 1 Terror(ism) and Aesthetics (2014), eds. György Fogarasi, Zoltán Cora, and Ervin Török Et al. ZOLTÁN CORA 2 and poetical theories of the sublime which are based on aesthetic qualities which are not built upon cognition.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-86240-0 - Macbeth, Second Edition William Shakespeare Frontmatter More information THE NEW CAMBRIDGE SHAKESPEARE general editor: Brian Gibbons, University of M¨unster associate general editor: A. R. Braunmuller, University of California, Los Angeles From the publication of the first volumes in 1984 the General Editor of the New Cambridge Shakespeare was Philip Brockbank and the Associate General Editors were Brian Gibbons and Robin Hood. From 1990 to 1994 the General Editor was Brian Gibbons and the Associate General Editors were A. R. Braunmuller and Robin Hood. MACBETH This is the most extensively annotated edition of Macbeth currently available, offering a thor- ough reconsideration of one of Shakespeare’s most popular plays. A full and accessible updated introduction studies the immediate theatrical and political contexts of Macbeth’s composition, especially the Gunpowder Plot and the contemporary account of an early performance at the Globe. It treats such issues as whether the Witches compel Macbeth to murder; whether Lady Macbeth is herself in some sense a witch; whether Banquo is Macbeth’s accomplice in crime; and what criticism is levelled against Macduff. Several possible new sources are suggested, and the presence of Thomas Middleton’s writing in the play is proposed. An extensive, well-illustrated account of the play in perfomance examines several cinematic versions, such as those by Kurosawa and Roman Polanski, and a brand-new introductory section on recent performances and adap- tations brings the edition completely up to date. © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-86240-0 - Macbeth, Second Edition William Shakespeare Frontmatter More information THE NEW CAMBRIDGE SHAKESPEARE All’s Well That Ends Well, edited by Russell Fraser Antony and Cleopatra, edited by David Bevington As You Like It, edited by Michael Hattaway The Comedy of Errors, edited by T.
    [Show full text]
  • 87 Hemingway, S. B. (Ed.), Henry IV, Part 1 (New Variorum Shake
    87 Texts Hemingway, S. B. (ed.), Henry IV, Part 1 (New Variorum Shake­ speare, Philadelphia and London, 1936). Shaaber, Matthias A. (ed.), Henry IV, Part 2 (New Variorum Shakespeare, Philadelphia and London, 1940). Humphreys, A. R. (ed.), Henry IV, Part 1 (Arden Shakespeare, London, 1960). Humphreys, A. R. (ed.), Henry IV, Part 2 (Arden Shakespeare, London, 1966). Davison, P. H. (ed.), Henry IV, Part 1 (New Penguin Shakespeare, Harmondsworth, 1968). Davison, P. H. (ed.), Henry IV, Part 2 (New Penguin Shakespeare, Harmondsworth, 1977). Mack, Maynard (ed.), Henry IV, Part 1 (Signet Shakespeare, New York, 1965, 1987). Holland, Norman L. (ed.), Henry IV, Part 2 (Signet Shakespeare, New York, 1965). Bevington, David (ed.), Henry IV, Part 1 (Oxford Shakespeare, Oxford, 1987). Melchiori, Giorgio (ed.), Henry IV, Part 2 (Oxford Shakespeare, Oxford, 1989). The New Variorum Shakespeare editions are monumental works of scholarship for reference only. All the remaining editions cater for students' needs with critical introductions, notes, sources and so on. Long established with footnotes that are easily used, the Arden edition has always been very popular. The Signet and Penguin editions have made their mark and are quite economical. The recent Oxford editions have excellent illustrations and are strong on stage history. 88 Bibliographies, Guides and Surveys Bergeron, David M., and De Sousa, Geraldo U., Shakespeare: A Study and Research Guide (Lawrence, Kansas, 1987). Berry, Edward, 'Twentieth-century Shakespeare criticism: the his­ tories' in Stanley Wells (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare Studies (Cambridge, 1986). Burden, Dennis H., 'Shakespeare's History Plays: 1952-1983', Shakespeare Survey 38, 1985, pp. 1-18.
    [Show full text]
  • ROMANTIC CRITICISM of SHAKESPEARIAN DRAMA By
    ROMANTIC CRITICISM OF SHAKESPEARIAN DRAMA By JOHN g,RAWFORD Associate of Arts Texarkana College Texarkana, Texas 1956 Bachelor of Science in Education Ouachita Baptist University Arkadelphia, Arkansas 1959 Master of Science in Education Drake University Des Moines, Iowa 1962 Submitted to the faculty of .the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION May, 1968 OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY OCT 24 1968 ROMANTIC CRITICISM OF SHAKESPEARIAN DRAMA Thesis Approved: Thesis Adviser \ f ,A .. < \ Dean of the Graduate College ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I should like to· thank anumber·of people who helped me in many different ways during· the·preparation· of .this dissertation, notably Dr. David· S. Berkeley,·major adviser, who-lent words of encouragement, guidance, understanding, and patience; but also my committee members, Dr. Darrel Ray·, Pr~ Judson Milburn, and· .Dr~- Loyd Douglas; and. the Oklahoma State University library staff, especially Miss Helen Donart and Mrs • .:fosephine Monk. iii TABLE-OF CONTENTS Chap tel' Page. I. INTRODUCTION •••• 1 II. HAMLET .••• . ' . .. ... 29 III. ANTONY -~ CLEOPATRA • • • • . • • . • • • It • . • • . • .• • a1 ·IV. HENRYV· . ,. ". .• . 122 V. THE· MERCHANT ·QE. VENICE .- . "' . 153 VI. CONCLUSION • • ' . -. ,. 187 BIBLIOGRAPHY • • • • · • . .. 191 iv CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Of all the so-called schools of Shakespearian criticism, the Romantic has been and continues to be one of the most influential. Per- haps this is true merely because of the impor~ance which the Romantic School places upon the genius of the subj~ct, for all schools of criti- cism recognize Shakespeare's ability at creating effective drama. A more accurate answer, however, probably lies in the fact that "romanti- cism" has a broad base and encompasses so very much.
    [Show full text]
  • DISSERTATION-Submission Reformatted
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5tv2w736 Author Harkins, Robert Lee Publication Date 2013 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 By Robert Lee Harkins A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair Professor Jonathan Sheehan Professor David Bates Fall 2013 © Robert Lee Harkins 2013 All Rights Reserved 1 Abstract The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 by Robert Lee Harkins Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair This study examines the problem of religious and political obedience in early modern England. Drawing upon extensive manuscript research, it focuses on the reign of Mary I (1553-1558), when the official return to Roman Catholicism was accompanied by the prosecution of Protestants for heresy, and the reign of Elizabeth I (1558-1603), when the state religion again shifted to Protestantism. I argue that the cognitive dissonance created by these seesaw changes of official doctrine necessitated a society in which religious mutability became standard operating procedure. For most early modern men and women it was impossible to navigate between the competing and contradictory dictates of Tudor religion and politics without conforming, dissimulating, or changing important points of conscience and belief.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 the Seven Deadly Sins</Em>
    Early Theatre 10.1 (2007) ROBERT HORNBACK The Reasons of Misrule Revisited: Evangelical Appropriations of Carnival in Tudor Revels Undoubtedly the most arresting Tudor likeness in the National Portrait Gallery, London, is William Scrots’s anamorphosis (NPG1299). As if mod- eled after a funhouse mirror reflection, this colorful oil on panel painting depicts within a stretched oblong, framed within a thin horizontal rectangle, the profile of a child with red hair and a head far wider than it is tall; measur- ing 63 inches x 16 ¾ inches, the portrait itself is, the Gallery website reports, its ‘squattest’ (‘nearly 4 times wider than it is high’). Its short-lived sitter’s nose juts out, Pinocchio-like, under a low bump of overhanging brow, as the chin recedes cartoonishly under a marked overbite. The subject thus seems to prefigure the whimsical grotesques of Inigo Jones’s antimasques decades later rather than to depict, as it does, the heir apparent of Henry VIII. Such is underrated Flemish master Scrots’s tour de force portrait of a nine-year-old Prince Edward in 1546, a year before his accession. As the NPG website ex- plains, ‘[Edward] is shown in distorted perspective (anamorphosis) …. When viewed from the right,’ however, ie, from a small cut-out in that side of the frame, he can be ‘seen in correct perspective’.1 I want to suggest that this de- lightful anamorphic image, coupled with the Gallery’s dry commentary, pro- vides an ironic but apt metaphor for the critical tradition addressing Edward’s reign and its theatrical spectacle: only when viewed from a one-sided point of view – in hindsight, from the anachronistic vantage point of an Anglo-Amer- ican tradition inflected by subsequent protestantism – can the boy king, his often riotous court spectacle, and mid-Tudor evangelicals in general be made to resemble a ‘correct’ portrait of the protestant sobriety, indeed the dour puritanism, of later generations.
    [Show full text]
  • Church Historical Writing in the English Transatlantic World During the Age of Enlightenment1
    CSCH President’s Address 2012 Church Historical Writing in the English Transatlantic World during the Age of Enlightenment1 DARREN W. SCHMIDT The King’s University College My research stemming from doctoral studies is focused on English- speaking evangelical use, interpretation, and production of church history in the eighteenth century, during which religious revivals on both sides of the North Atlantic signalled new developments on many fronts. Church history was of vital importance for early evangelicals, in ways similar to earlier generations of Protestants beginning with the Reformation itself. In the eighteenth century nerves were still sensitive from the religious and political intrigues, polemic, and outright violence in the seventeenth- century British Isles and American colonies; terms such as “Puritan” and “enthusiast” maintained the baggage of suspicion. Presumed to be guilty by association, evangelical leaders were compelled to demonstrate that the perceived “surprising work of God” in their midst had a pedigree: they accordingly construed their experience as part of a long narrative of religious ebb and flow, declension and revival. Time and time again, eighteenth-century evangelicals turned to the pages of the past to vindicate and to validate their religious identity.2 Browsing through historiographical studies, one is hard-pressed to find discussion of eighteenth-century church historical writing. There is general scholarly agreement that the Protestant Reformation gave rise to a new historical interest. In answer to Catholic charges of novelty, Historical Papers 2012: Canadian Society of Church History 188 Church Historical Writing in the English Transatlantic World Protestants critiqued aspects of medieval Catholicism and sought to show their continuity with early Christianity.
    [Show full text]
  • Dares Phrygius' De Excidio Trojae Historia: Philological Commentary and Translation
    Faculteit Letteren & Wijsbegeerte Dares Phrygius' De Excidio Trojae Historia: Philological Commentary and Translation Jonathan Cornil Scriptie voorgedragen tot het bekomen van de graad van Master in de Taal- en letterkunde (Latijn – Engels) 2011-2012 Promotor: Prof. Dr. W. Verbaal ii Table of Contents Table of Contents iii Foreword v Introduction vii Chapter I. De Excidio Trojae Historia: Philological and Historical Comments 1 A. Dares and His Historia: Shrouded in Mystery 2 1. Who Was ‘Dares the Phrygian’? 2 2. The Role of Cornelius Nepos 6 3. Time of Origin and Literary Environment 9 4. Analysing the Formal Characteristics 11 B. Dares as an Example of ‘Rewriting’ 15 1. Homeric Criticism and the Trojan Legacy in the Middle Ages 15 2. Dares’ Problematic Connection with Dictys Cretensis 20 3. Comments on the ‘Lost Greek Original’ 27 4. Conclusion 31 Chapter II. Translations 33 A. Translating Dares: Frustra Laborat, Qui Omnibus Placere Studet 34 1. Investigating DETH’s Style 34 2. My Own Translations: a Brief Comparison 39 3. A Concise Analysis of R.M. Frazer’s Translation 42 B. Translation I 50 C. Translation II 73 D. Notes 94 Bibliography 95 Appendix: the Latin DETH 99 iii iv Foreword About two years ago, I happened to be researching Cornelius Nepos’ biography of Miltiades as part of an assignment for a class devoted to the study of translating Greek and Latin texts. After heaping together everything I could find about him in the library, I came to the conclusion that I still needed more information. So I decided to embrace my identity as a loyal member of the ‘Internet generation’ and began my virtual journey through the World Wide Web in search of articles on Nepos.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in the Work of Colley Cibber
    BULLETIN OF THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS HUMANISTIC STUDIES Vol. 1 October 1, 1912 No. 1 STUDIES IN THE WORK OF COLLEY CIBBER BY DE WITT C.:'CROISSANT, PH.D. A ssistant Professor of English Language in the University of Kansas LAWRENCE, OCTOBER. 1912 PUBLISHED BY THE UNIVERSITY CONTENTS I Notes on Cibber's Plays II Cibber and the Development of Sentimental Comedy Bibliography PREFACE The following studies are extracts from a longer paper on the life and work of Cibber. No extended investigation concerning the life or the literary activity of Cibber has recently appeared, and certain misconceptions concerning his personal character, as well as his importance in the development of English literature and the literary merit of his plays, have been becoming more and more firmly fixed in the minds of students. Cibber was neither so much of a fool nor so great a knave as is generally supposed. The estimate and the judgment of two of his contemporaries, Pope and Dennis, have been far too widely accepted. The only one of the above topics that this paper deals with, otherwise than incidentally, is his place in the development of a literary mode. While Cibber was the most prominent and influential of the innovators among the writers of comedy of his time, he was not the only one who indicated the change toward sentimental comedy in his work. This subject, too, needs fuller investigation. I hope, at some future time, to continue my studies in this field. This work was suggested as a subject for a doctor's thesis, by Professor John Matthews Manly, while I was a graduate student at the University of Chicago a number of years ago, and was con• tinued later under the direction of Professor Thomas Marc Par- rott at Princeton.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources of Lear
    Meddling with Masterpieces: the On-going Adaptation of King Lear by Lynne Bradley B.A., Queen’s University 1997 M.A., Queen’s University 1998 A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of English © Lynne Bradley, 2008 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This dissertation may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photo-copying or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Meddling with Masterpieces: the On-going Adaptation of King Lear by Lynne Bradley B.A., Queen’s University 1997 M.A., Queen’s University 1998 Supervisory Committee Dr. Sheila M. Rabillard, Supervisor (Department of English) Dr. Janelle Jenstad, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Michael Best, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Annalee Lepp, Outside Member (Department of Women’s Studies) iii Supervisory Committee Dr. Sheila M. Rabillard, Supervisor (Department of English) Dr. Janelle Jenstad, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Michael Best, Departmental Member (Department of English) Dr. Annalee Lepp, Outside Member (Department of Women’s Studies) Abstract The temptation to meddle with Shakespeare has proven irresistible to playwrights since the Restoration and has inspired some of the most reviled and most respected works of theatre. Nahum Tate’s tragic-comic King Lear (1681) was described as an execrable piece of dementation, but played on London stages for one hundred and fifty years. David Garrick was equally tempted to adapt King Lear in the eighteenth century, as were the burlesque playwrights of the nineteenth. In the twentieth century, the meddling continued with works like King Lear’s Wife (1913) by Gordon Bottomley and Dead Letters (1910) by Maurice Baring.
    [Show full text]
  • Matteo Revolti « Remarks Upon That Wonderful Chapter »: the Controversy About Luxury Between Mandeville and Dennis on 9Th Ap
    Matteo Revolti « Remarks upon that wonderful chapter1»: the controversy about luxury between Mandeville and Dennis On 9th April 1724 the Daily Courant published the advertising of a book entitled Vice and luxury publick mischiefs: the author of the book was the sixty-four year John Dennis, English critic, who was engaged in those years in a literary controversy with Alexander Pope. The work came out some months after the early attacks moved by Law and Fiddes against the Fable of the Bees: unlike those authors, the criticism of Dennis concerned particularly the problem of luxury exposed in Mandeville’s text2. That subject, soon become the Leitmotiv of many critics of the Fable, played an essential role within the public debate in Great Britain at the beginning of the Eighteenth century. Dennis’s contribution to the topic is important for two reasons: the topos of luxury is strongly anchored within his literary productions; moreover his book against Fable symbolized the clash between the values of the ancient Constitution and the new economy model promoted by Mandeville. Born in London from a saddler family in 1657, Dennis attended the Caius College of Cambridge and he received his Master of Art in 1683 at the Trinity Hall. After his degree he began to hang around the Will’s Coffee-house where he met the famous dramatist John Dryden who afterwards became his patron. Dennis was soon known in London for his ferocious reviews against some contemporaries authors such as Blackmore, Steele and Gay. The same Mandeville in his Letter to Dion described him as «a noted Critick, who seems to hate all Books that sell, and no other[…]3».
    [Show full text]
  • De Excidio Troiae by Dares Phrygius and Valerius Flaccus
    800 Miscellanea / D. Galli / Mnemosyne 66 (2013) 800-808 De excidio Troiae by Dares Phrygius and Valerius Flaccus De excidio Troiae by Dares Phrygius is a short prose tale concerning the Trojan war,1) written probably between the 5th and the 6th centuries AD.2) In the first three chapters it starts by narrating the journey of the Argonauts to Colchis with the goal of conquering the golden fleece, presented as the remote cause of the Trojan war. In chapter one Dares narrates that Pelias, king of the Peloponnese, had a brother called Aeson and that, since his son Jason is a strong and brave man who could become a peril for his power, Pelias thought up the voyage to Colchis in order to kill him. In the second chapter Dares describes how Jason sailed with his fellows towards Colchis and landed first on the Phrygian coast where he suffered king Laomedon’s threats. Chapter 3 tells Hercules’ revenge on Laomedon with the looting of Troy, the murder of the king and the kidnapping of Hesione, his daughter. Hermann Dunger3) in 1869 was the first to recognize many similarities between these initial chapters of Dares’ tale and Valerius Flaccus’ Argonautica, advancing the thesis that they are the result of Dares’ familiarity with Valerius’ account; Dunger’s thesis has recently been restated by Andrew Zissos in his diachronic survey4) of the literary and artistic reception of Valerius Flaccus’ Argonautica from the Flavian period down to the 20th century. The most important similari- ties between the two poems pointed out by Dunger are the following: 1.
    [Show full text]