Characteristics and Resistance to Antimicrobials of Staphylococcus Aureus and Staphylococcus Pseudintermedius Isolated from Pet Animals and Their Owners

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Characteristics and Resistance to Antimicrobials of Staphylococcus Aureus and Staphylococcus Pseudintermedius Isolated from Pet Animals and Their Owners LITHUANIAN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES VETERINARY ACADEMY Jūratė Stankevičienė CHARACTERISTICS AND RESISTANCE TO ANTIMICROBIALS OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS AND STAPHYLOCOCCUS PSEUDINTERMEDIUS ISOLATED FROM PET ANIMALS AND THEIR OWNERS Doctoral Dissertation Agricultural Sciences, Veterinary (A 002) Kaunas, 2019 Dissertation has been prepared at the Department of Veterinary Patho- biology (former Infectious Diseases) of the Veterinary Academy of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences during the period of 2011–2019. Scientific Supervisor Prof. Dr. Jūratė Šiugždaitė (Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Agricultural Sciences, Veterinary – A 002). Dissertation is defended at the Veterinary Research Council of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences: Chairperson Prof. Dr. Alius Pockevičius (Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Agricultural Sciences, Veterinary – A 002). Members: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Gintaras Daunoras (Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Agricultural Sciences, Veterinary – A 002); Dr. Marius Virgailis (Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Agricul- tural Sciences, Veterinary – A 002); Prof. Dr. Algimantas Paulauskas (Vytautas Magnus University, Natural Sciences, Biology – N 010); Dr. Olga Muter (University of Latvia, Natural Sciences, Biology – N 010). Dissertation will be defended at the open session of the Veterinary Research Council of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Veterinary Academy, 2019 on 30 of August at 10 p.m. in the Dr. S. Jankauskas auditorium. Address: Tilžės 18, LT-47181, Kaunas, Lithuania. LIETUVOS SVEIKATOS MOKSLŲ UNIVERSITETAS VETERINARIJOS AKADEMIJA Jūratė Stankevičienė STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS IR STAPHYLOCOCCUS PSEUDINTERMEDIUS, IŠSKIRTŲ IŠ GYVŪNŲ AUGINTINIŲ IR JŲ SAVININKŲ, CHARAKTERIZAVIMAS IR ATSPARUMAS ANTIMIKROBINĖMS MEDŽIAGOMS Daktaro disertacija Žemės ūkio mokslai, veterinarija (A 002) Kaunas, 2019 Disertacija rengta 2011–2019 metais Lietuvos sveikatos mokslų universi- tete, Veterinarijos akademijoje, Veterinarinės patobiologijos katedroje (bu- vusi Užkrečiamųjų ligų katedra), Mikrobiologijos laboratorijoje. Mokslinė vadovė prof. dr. Jūratė Šiugždaitė (Lietuvos sveikatos mokslų universitetas, že– mės ūkio mokslai, veterinarija – A 002). Disertacija ginama Lietuvos sveikatos mokslų universiteto Veterinarijos mokslo krypties taryboje: Pirmininkas prof. dr. Alius Pockevičius (Lietuvos sveikatos mokslų universitetas, žemės ūkio mokslai, veterinarija – A 002). Nariai: doc. dr. Gintaras Daunoras (Lietuvos sveikatos mokslų universitetas, žemės ūkio mokslai, veterinarija – A 002); dr. Marius Virgailis (Lietuvos sveikatos mokslų universitetas, žemės ūkio mokslai, veterinarija – A 002); prof. dr. Algimantas Paulauskas (Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas, gamtos mokslai, biologija – N 010); dr. Olga Muter (Latvijos universitetas, gamtos mokslai, biologija – N 010). Disertacija ginama viešame Veterinarijos mokslo krypties tarybos posėdyje 2019 m. rugpjūčio 30 d. 10 val. Lietuvos sveikatos mokslų universiteto Veterinarijos akademijos dr. S. Jankausko auditorijoje. Disertacijos gynimo vietos adresas: Tilžės g. 18, LT-47181, Kaunas, Lietuva. CONTENTS ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................... 8 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 9 1. LITERATURE REVIEW ........................................................................ 11 1.1. History .............................................................................................. 11 1.2. Taxonomy......................................................................................... 11 1.3. Colonization of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius ..................................................................................... 12 1.3.1. Staphylococcus aureus in canine and feline ........................... 12 1.3.2. Staphylococcus aureus in human ............................................ 13 1.3.3. Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in dogs and cats ................ 13 1.3.4. Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in human .......................... 14 1.4. Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius as pathogens ............................................................................................ 14 1.4.1. Diseases caused by Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in dogs and cats ......................... 14 1.4.2. Diseases caused by Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in human .................................... 14 1.5. General characteristics and biochemical properties of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius .............. 15 1.6. Virulence factors of staphylococci ................................................... 17 1.7. Identification of staphylococci ......................................................... 20 1.7.1. Phenotypic identification ........................................................ 20 1.7.2. Genotypic identification ......................................................... 22 1.7.3. DNA sequencing ..................................................................... 23 1.8. Resistance to antimicrobials ............................................................. 25 1.8.1. Antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius .............................................................................. 26 1.8.2. Antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus aureus ............... 28 1.8.3. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing ........................................ 29 1.9. Interspecies transmission of staphylococci ...................................... 31 2. MATERIAL AND METHODS .............................................................. 33 2.1. Collection of bacterial samples ........................................................ 33 2.2. Isolation of pure culture of the staphylococci .................................. 35 2.3. Phenotypic identification of staphylococci ...................................... 35 2.3.1. Detection of coagulase-positive staphylococci ....................... 35 2.3.2. Determination of virulence factors for Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius ................................. 35 5 2.3.3. Biochemical characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius .................................................... 36 2.4. Genotypic identification of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius ........................................................... 38 2.5. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius ........................................................... 39 2.5.1. Antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius detection by disc diffusion method .............................................................................................. 39 2.5.2. The minimal inhibitory and minimum bactericidal concentrations of antimicrobials against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius .................................................... 40 2.5.3. Genotypic identification of resistance genes in Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius ... 41 2.6. Statistical analysis ............................................................................ 42 2.7. Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis ............................................. 43 3. RESULTS ................................................................................................ 45 3.1. Description of population ................................................................. 45 3.2. Isolation of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius ..................................................................................... 46 3.2.1. Detection of virulence factors in Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius ............................................. 47 3.2.2. Biochemical identification of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius .................................................... 47 3.2.3. Genotypic identification of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius .................................................... 48 3.3. Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius ..................................................................................... 49 3.3.1. Staphylococcus aureus in canine ............................................ 50 3.3.2. Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in canine ........................... 50 3.3.3. Staphylococcus aureus in feline.............................................. 51 3.3.4. Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in feline ............................ 52 3.3.5. Staphylococcus aureus in humans .......................................... 52 3.3.6. Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in humans ......................... 53 3.4. Phylogenetic analysis of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius ........................................................... 55 3.5. Staphylococci genome comparisons ................................................ 56 3.6. Phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius ........................................ 57 6 3.6.1. Resistance of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius in companion animals....................................................................... 58 3.6.2. Resistance of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius
Recommended publications
  • Download The
    SIDEROPHORE-MEDIATED IRON METABOLISM IN STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS by Marek John Kobylarz B.Sc., The University of Victoria, 2010 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND POSTDOCTORAL STUDIES (Microbiology and Immunology) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) February 2016 © Marek John Kobylarz, 2016 Abstract Staphylococcus aureus requires iron as a nutrient and uses uptake systems to extract iron from the human host. S. aureus produces the iron-chelating siderophore staphyloferrin B (SB) to scavenge for available iron under conditions of low iron stress. Upon iron-siderophore re-entry into the cell, iron is separated from the siderophore complex to initiate assimilation into metabolism. To gain insight into how SB biosynthesis is integrated into S. aureus central metabolism, the three SB precursor biosynthetic proteins, SbnA, SbnB, and SbnG, were biochemically characterized. SbnG is a citrate synthase analogous to the citrate synthase enzyme present in the TCA cycle. The crystal structure of SbnG was solved and superpositions with TCA cycle citrate synthases support a model for convergent evolution in the active site architecture and a conserved catalytic mechanism. Since L-Dap is an essential precursor for SB, the biosynthetic pathway for L-Dap was elucidated. A combination of X-ray crystallography, biochemical assays and biophysical techniques were used to delineate the reaction mechanisms for SbnA and SbnB, demonstrating that SbnA performs a -replacement reaction using O-phospho-L-serine (OPS) and L-glutamate to produce N-(1-amino-1-carboxy-2-ethyl)-glutamic acid (ACEGA). Oxidative hydrolysis of ACEGA catalyzed by SbnB produces -ketoglutarate and L-Dap.
    [Show full text]
  • Occurrence and Quantification of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes In
    BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT published: 22 March 2021 doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.651781 Occurrence and Quantification of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in the Gastrointestinal Microbiome of Two Wild Seabird Species With Contrasting Behaviors Edited by: Alain Hartmann, Ana Carolina Ewbank 1*†, Fernando Esperón 2†, Carlos Sacristán 1, Irene Sacristán 3, Institut National de Recherche pour 2 4 4 4 l’agriculture, l’alimentation et Elena Neves , Samira Costa-Silva , Marzia Antonelli , Janaina Rocha Lorenço , 4 1 l’environnement (INRAE), France Cristiane K. M. Kolesnikovas and José Luiz Catão-Dias Reviewed by: 1 Laboratory of Wildlife Comparative Pathology, Department of Pathology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Hazem Ramadan, Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 2 Group of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, Animal Health Mansoura University, Egypt Research Centre (INIA-CISA), Madrid, Spain, 3 Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile, Getahun E. Agga, 4 Associação R3 Animal, Florianópolis, Brazil United States Department of Agriculture, United States Antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) are environmental pollutants and anthropization *Correspondence: Ana Carolina Ewbank indicators. We evaluated human interference in the marine ecosystem through the [email protected] ocurrence and quantification (real-time PCRs) of 21 plasmid-mediated ARGs in †These authors have contributed enema samples of 25 wild seabirds, upon admission into rehabilitation: kelp gull equally to this work and share first (Larus dominicanus, n = 14) and Magellanic penguin (Spheniscus magellanicus, authorship n = 11). Overall, higher resistance values were observed in kelp gulls (non-migratory Specialty section: coastal synanthropic) in comparison with Magellanic penguins (migratory pelagic This article was submitted to non-synanthropic).
    [Show full text]
  • Antimicrobial Resistance in Companion Animal Pathogens in Australia and Assessment of Pradofloxacin on the Gut Microbiota
    Antimicrobial resistance in companion animal pathogens in Australia and assessment of pradofloxacin on the gut microbiota Sugiyono Saputra A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences The University of Adelaide February 2018 Table of Contents Thesis Declaration ...................................................................................................................... iii Dedication ................................................................................................................................. iv Acknowledgement ...................................................................................................................... v Preamble .................................................................................................................................... vi List of Publications ..................................................................................................................... vii Abstract .......................................................................................................................................ix Chapter 1 General Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 1.1. Antimicrobials and their consequences ............................................................................ 2 1.2. The emergence and monitoring AMR................................................................................ 2
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence of Colonization and Antimicrobial Resistance Among Coagulase Positive Staphylococci in Dogs, and the Relatedness of Canine and Human Staphylococcus Aureus
    PREVALENCE OF COLONIZATION AND ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE AMONG COAGULASE POSITIVE STAPHYLOCOCCI IN DOGS, AND THE RELATEDNESS OF CANINE AND HUMAN STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate Studies and Research In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the Department of Veterinary Microbiology In the College of Graduate Studies and Research University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, Saskatchewan By Joseph Elliot Rubin © Copyright Joseph Elliot Rubin, May 2011. All rights reserved Permission to use Postgraduate Thesis In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirement for a postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the libraries of this university may make it free available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the following: Dr. Manuel Chirino-Trejo, DVM, MSc., PhD Department of Veterinary Microbiology University of Saskatchewan In his absence, permission may be granted from the head of the department of Veterinary Microbiology or the Dean of the Western College of Veterinary Medicine. It is understood that any copying, publication, or use of this thesis or part of it for financial gain shall not be allowed without with author’s written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to the author and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in this thesis. Requests for permission to copy or make other use of materials in this thesis in whole or in part should be addressed to: Head of the Department of Veterinary Microbiology Western College of Veterinary Medicine University of Saskatchewan 52 Campus Drive Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5B4 i Abstract Coagulase positive staphylococci, Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, are important causes of infection in human beings and dogs respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection of Staphylococcus Aureus and Other Coagulase Positive Staphylococci in Bovine Raw Milk in Khartoum State by Ikhtyar Ah
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by KhartoumSpace Detection of Staphylococcus aureus and other Coagulase Positive Staphylococci in Bovine Raw Milk in Khartoum State By Ikhtyar Ahmed Hassan Ali B.C.Sc (2003) Supervisor Prof. Mohammed Taha Shigiddi Department of Microbiology Faculty of Veterinary medicine A dissertation submitted to University of Khartoum in partial fulfillment for the requirement of the Degree of Master of Science in Microbiology Department of Microbiology Faculty of veterinary Medicine University of Khartoum 2010 Dedication to my father, mother, brothers and sisters with love I Table of Contents Subject Page Dedication………………………………………………………. I Table of Contents………………………………………………. II List of Figures…………………………………………………… VII List of Table…………………………………………………….. VIII Acknowledgments………………………………………………. IX Abstract…………………………………………………………. X Abstract (Arabic)……………………………………………… XI Introduction…………………………………………………… 1 Chapter One: Literature Review…………………………….. 3 1.1. Health Hazards of Raw Milk…………………………………… 4 1.2. Pathogenic bacteria in milk........................................................ 5 1.3. Microbial quality of raw milk.................................................... 6 1.4. Staphylococci........................................................................... 7 1.4.1. Coagulase positive staphylococci (CPS)……………………… 8 1.4.2. Coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS)……………………… 10 1.5. Staphylococcus aureus………………………………………… 10 1.5.1. Virulence characteristics of S.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of the Viral and Bacterial Microbiota in Intestinal
    Investigation of the viral and bacterial microbiota in intestinal samples from mink (Neovison vison) with pre-weaning diarrhea syndrome using next generation sequencing Birch, Julie Melsted; Ullman, Karin; Struve, Tina; Agger, Jens Frederik; Hammer, Anne Sofie; Leijon, Mikael; Jensen, Henrik Elvang Published in: PLOS ONE DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205890 Publication date: 2018 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Document license: CC BY Citation for published version (APA): Birch, J. M., Ullman, K., Struve, T., Agger, J. F., Hammer, A. S., Leijon, M., & Jensen, H. E. (2018). Investigation of the viral and bacterial microbiota in intestinal samples from mink (Neovison vison) with pre-weaning diarrhea syndrome using next generation sequencing. PLOS ONE, 13(10), [0205890]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205890 Download date: 09. apr.. 2020 RESEARCH ARTICLE Investigation of the viral and bacterial microbiota in intestinal samples from mink (Neovison vison) with pre-weaning diarrhea syndrome using next generation sequencing 1 2 3 1 Julie Melsted BirchID *, Karin Ullman , Tina Struve , Jens Frederik Agger , Anne Sofie Hammer1, Mikael Leijon2, Henrik Elvang Jensen1 a1111111111 1 Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark, 2 Department of Microbiology, National Veterinary Institute, a1111111111 Uppsala, Sweden, 3 Kopenhagen Fur Diagnostics, Kopenhagen Fur, Glostrup, Denmark a1111111111 a1111111111 * [email protected] a1111111111 Abstract Pre-weaning diarrhea (PWD) in mink kits is a common multifactorial syndrome on commer- OPEN ACCESS cial mink farms. Several potential pathogens such as astroviruses, caliciviruses, Escherichia Citation: Birch JM, Ullman K, Struve T, Agger JF, coli and Staphylococcus delphini have been studied, but the etiology of the syndrome Hammer AS, Leijon M, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • The Genera Staphylococcus and Macrococcus
    Prokaryotes (2006) 4:5–75 DOI: 10.1007/0-387-30744-3_1 CHAPTER 1.2.1 ehT areneG succocolyhpatS dna succocorcMa The Genera Staphylococcus and Macrococcus FRIEDRICH GÖTZ, TAMMY BANNERMAN AND KARL-HEINZ SCHLEIFER Introduction zolidone (Baker, 1984). Comparative immu- nochemical studies of catalases (Schleifer, 1986), The name Staphylococcus (staphyle, bunch of DNA-DNA hybridization studies, DNA-rRNA grapes) was introduced by Ogston (1883) for the hybridization studies (Schleifer et al., 1979; Kilp- group micrococci causing inflammation and per et al., 1980), and comparative oligonucle- suppuration. He was the first to differentiate otide cataloguing of 16S rRNA (Ludwig et al., two kinds of pyogenic cocci: one arranged in 1981) clearly demonstrated the epigenetic and groups or masses was called “Staphylococcus” genetic difference of staphylococci and micro- and another arranged in chains was named cocci. Members of the genus Staphylococcus “Billroth’s Streptococcus.” A formal description form a coherent and well-defined group of of the genus Staphylococcus was provided by related species that is widely divergent from Rosenbach (1884). He divided the genus into the those of the genus Micrococcus. Until the early two species Staphylococcus aureus and S. albus. 1970s, the genus Staphylococcus consisted of Zopf (1885) placed the mass-forming staphylo- three species: the coagulase-positive species S. cocci and tetrad-forming micrococci in the genus aureus and the coagulase-negative species S. epi- Micrococcus. In 1886, the genus Staphylococcus dermidis and S. saprophyticus, but a deeper look was separated from Micrococcus by Flügge into the chemotaxonomic and genotypic proper- (1886). He differentiated the two genera mainly ties of staphylococci led to the description of on the basis of their action on gelatin and on many new staphylococcal species.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Class of Quorum Quenching Molecules from Staphylococcus Species Affects Communication and Growth of Gram-Negative Bacteria
    A New Class of Quorum Quenching Molecules from Staphylococcus Species Affects Communication and Growth of Gram-Negative Bacteria Ya-Yun Chu1, Mulugeta Nega1, Martina Wo¨ lfle2, Laure Plener3, Stephanie Grond2, Kirsten Jung3, Friedrich Go¨ tz1* 1 Interfaculty Institute of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Tu¨bingen (IMIT), Microbial Genetics, University of Tu¨bingen, Tu¨bingen, Germany, 2 Organic Chemistry, University of Tu¨bingen, Tu¨bingen, Germany, 3 Munich Center for Integrated Protein Science (CiPSM) at the Department of Microbiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universita¨t Mu¨nchen, Martinsried, Germany Abstract The knowledge that many pathogens rely on cell-to-cell communication mechanisms known as quorum sensing, opens a new disease control strategy: quorum quenching. Here we report on one of the rare examples where Gram-positive bacteria, the ‘Staphylococcus intermedius group’ of zoonotic pathogens, excrete two compounds in millimolar concentrations that suppress the quorum sensing signaling and inhibit the growth of a broad spectrum of Gram-negative beta- and gamma-proteobacteria. These compounds were isolated from Staphylococcus delphini. They represent a new class of quorum quenchers with the chemical formula N-[2-(1H-indol-3-yl)ethyl]-urea and N-(2-phenethyl)-urea, which we named yayurea A and B, respectively. In vitro studies with the N-acyl homoserine lactone (AHL) responding receptor LuxN of V. harveyi indicated that both compounds caused opposite effects on phosphorylation to those caused by AHL. This explains the quorum quenching activity. Staphylococcal strains producing yayurea A and B clearly benefit from an increased competitiveness in a mixed community. Citation: Chu Y-Y, Nega M, Wo¨lfle M, Plener L, Grond S, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSIDADE NOVA DE LISBOA Instituto De Higiene E Medicina Tropical Caracterização De Plasmídeos De Staphylococcus Epidermid
    UNIVERSIDADE NOVA DE LISBOA Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical Caracterização de plasmídeos de Staphylococcus epidermidis e correlação com a resistência a compostos antimicrobianos mediada por efluxo Frederico Duarte Holtreman DISSERTAÇÃO PARA OBTENÇÃO DO GRAU DE MESTRE EM CIÊNCIAS BIOMÉDICAS ESPECIALIDADE EM BIOLOGIA MOLECULAR EM MEDICINA TROPICAL E INTERNACIONAL ABRIL DE 2018 UNIVERSIDADE NOVA DE LISBOA Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical Caracterização de plasmídeos de Staphylococcus epidermidis e correlação com a resistência a compostos antimicrobianos mediada por efluxo Frederico Duarte Holtreman DISSERTAÇÃO PARA OBTENÇÃO DO GRAU DE MESTRE EM CIÊNCIAS BIOMÉDICAS ESPECIALIDADE EM BIOLOGIA MOLECULAR EM MEDICINA TROPICAL E INTERNACIONAL Orientadora: Professora Doutora Isabel Couto Co-orientadoras: Doutora Sofia Santos Costa Professora Doutora Constança Pomba Laboratório onde o trabalho experimental foi desenvolvido: Unidade de Microbiologia Médica Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical, Universidade Nova de Lisboa ABRIL DE 2018 Comunicações em congressos Os resultados apresentados na presente Dissertação foram objecto de apresentação em co- autoria das seguintes comunicações em congressos, sob a forma de Poster: Holtreman F, Costa SS, Rosa M, Viveiros M, Pomba C, Couto I. Influência do efluxo na resistência a antibióticos e susceptibilidade reduzida aos biocidas em Staphylococcus epidermidis. In Livro de abstracts do 4º Congresso Nacional de Medicina Tropical, IHMT, pp. 96. Lisboa, Portugal, 19-21 de Abril 2017 Holtreman F, Costa SS, Rosa M, Viveiros M, Pomba C, Couto I. Characterization of plasmid encoded efflux determinants from Staphylococcus epidermidis. In Livro de abstracts do Congresso Nacional de Microbiologia e Biotecnologia (Microbiotec17), pp. 353, P-273. Porto, Portugal, 7-9 de Dezembro 2017. Costa SS, Rosa M, Rodrigues AC, Santos CM, Holtreman F, Viveiros M, Pomba C, Couto I.
    [Show full text]
  • Who/Bs/10.2154 English Only Expert Committee On
    WHO/BS/10.2154 ENGLISH ONLY EXPERT COMMITTEE ON BIOLOGICAL STANDARDIZATION Geneva, 18 to 22 October 2010 Report on the International Validation Study on Bacteria Standards (Transfusion-Relevant Bacterial Strain Panel) AND Proposal for a validation study for enlargement of the transfusion-relevant bacterial strain panel" Thomas Montag-Lessing, Melanie Stoermer and Kay-Martin Hanschmann Paul Ehrlich Institute, Paul-Ehrlich-Strasse 51-59, D-63225 Langen, Germany © World Health Organization 2010 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization can be obtained from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected] ). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to WHO Press, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; e- mail: [email protected] ). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Captive Bottlenose Dolphins And
    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Captive bottlenose dolphins and killer whales harbor a species-specific skin microbiota that varies among individuals Chiarello M., Villéger S., Bouvier C., Auguet JC., and Bouvier T. 1 Supplementary Information S1: Description of the two PCR protocols used in this study and comparison of bacterial composition on water samples Skin samples Water samples Kit Phusion High-Fidelity PuRe Taq Ready-To-Go PCR Beads Total vol. (µL) 20 25 DNA vol. (µL) 2 5 Initial denaturation 1 min 98°C 2 min 94°C PCR cycle 1 min 94°C; 40s 57.8°C; 30s 72°C 1 min 94°C; 40s 57.8°C; 30s 72°C Nb. of cycles 35 35 Final extension 10 min 72°C 10 min 72°C S1-Table 1: PCR reagents and conditions used for the two sample types studied. Skin DNA and water DNA were respectively amplified using the Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (Biolabs, Ipswich, USA) and PuRe Taq Ready-To-Go PCR Beads (Amersham Biosciences, Freiburg, Germany) following manufacturer’s instructions. 2 S1-Fig 1: Most abundant classes and families in planktonic communities analyzed using Phusion and Ready-To-Go kits. Both PCR types were performed on the same DNA extracted from animals’ surrounding water. Class-level bacterial composition was very similar between both PCR types. 3 S1-Fig 2: PCoAs based on Weighted Unifrac, showing planktonic communities analyzed using both PCR types. On (A) panel, all samples included in this study plus water replicates that could be amplified using Phusion kit. On (B) panel, only planktonic communities were displayed.
    [Show full text]
  • Gatunki Koagulazododatnie Rodzaju Staphylococcus – Taksonomia, Chorobotwórczość 235
    POST. MIKROBIOL., GATUNKI KOAGULAZODODATNIE 2017, 56, 2, 233–244 http://www.pm.microbiology.pl RODZAJU STAPHYLOCOCCUS – TAKSONOMIA, CHOROBOTWÓRCZOŚĆ Wioletta Kmieciak1*, Eligia Maria Szewczyk1 1 Zakład Mikrobiologii Farmaceutycznej i Diagnostyki Mikrobiologicznej, Uniwersytet Medyczny w Łodzi Wpłynęło w grudniu 2016 r. Zaakceptowano w lutym 2017 r. 1. Wstęp. 2. Koagulaza gronkowcowa. 3. Staphylococcus aureus. 4. Gronkowce grupy SIG. 4.1. Staphylococcus intermedius. 4.2. Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. 4.3. Staphylococcus delphini. 5. Staphylococcus hyicus. 6. Staphylococcus schleiferi subsp. coagulans. 7. Staphylococcus lutrae. 8. Staphylococcus agnetis. 9. Podsumowanie Coagulase-positive species of the genus Staphylococcus – taxonomy, pathogenicity Abstract: Staphylococci constitute an important component of the human microbiome. Most of them are coagulase-negative species, whose importance in the pathogenesis of human infections has been widely recognized and is being documented on a regular basis. Until recently, the only well-known coagulase-positive staphylococcus species recognized as human pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus. Previously, the ability to produce coagulase was used as its basic diagnostic feature, because other coagulase-positive species were associated with animal hosts. Progress in the laboratory medicine, in which automatic or semi-automatic systems identify the staphylococci species, revealed a phenomenon of spreading of the coagulase positive staphylococci to new niches and hosts, as they are being isolated from human clinical materials with increasing frequency. As a result, many reaserchers and laboratories have turned their attention to the phenomenon, which caused an inflow of new data on these species. An increasingly expansive pathogenic potential of coagulase-positive staphylococci against humans has been documented. In the presented study, recent data on both S.
    [Show full text]